logo
year 8, Issue 27 (5-2024)                   Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2024, 8(27): 313-335 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Atayinia S, Mortezaee M. (2024). The Interaction of Iranian Art and Shia Ideas in the Tower Tombs of Kojur. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 8(27), 313-335. doi:10.22034/PJAS.8.27.313
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-650-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Archeology of the Islamic Era, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology Islamic Period, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism (RICHT), Tehran, Iran , m_mortezayi2008@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1343 Views)
Abstract
With the arrival of Islam in Iran, art came into the service of Islam and an interaction between Iranian art and Islamic thought was formed, which can be observed in the art of Islamic architecture in Iran. One of the most obvious types of cultural and religious architecture of the past, which has played an essential role in Islamic architecture from various historical, artistic, religious and social aspects, is tower-shaped tombs. These buildings have a long history in the context of Iranian culture and society, and for this reason, they have a relatively high diversity. The tombs and the blessed shrines after the mosques are the most important elements of religious architecture, in which you can see the beauty, elegance, technique and creativeness of architecture. In this research, it is tried to deal with Iranian art and Shia ideas in the architecture of religious-monumental buildings, as well as the connection between politics and religion in terms of architecture and aesthetics. The ancient region of Kojur (Old Royan) contains a considerable number of Islamic era tomb buildings that, in addition to having the general principles of Islamic architecture, also have special regional characteristics which can contribute to better understanding the native architecture and its function; furthermore, the religious and political link demonstrated in the architectural art of this region. The question raised in this research is, what was the function of the religious buildings of the tower-shaped tombs in the Islamic era? And in response, it can be said that, in addition to the funerary function, these religious elements can also have a religious-political function. The research method of this article in the context of studies was based on the purpose of the fundamental research type and based on the nature and method of the descriptive-historical research style. The way to collect information in this research is through documentary (library) method. The results of this research in the analysis and investigation of the architectural developments of the tower-shaped tombs in the Kojur region have shown the combination of Iranian, Islamic art and native architecture.
Keywords: Iranian Art, Shia Ideas, Tower Tombs, Kojur.

Introduction
The Muslim artist, realizing this meaning and value, designs the face and creates his artwork according to the aspects of Islamic (Shia) thought and wisdom. Religious architecture has also indicated and emerged meanings with the same foundations and concepts. Now considering that the greatness and sanctity of the personality of the prophet of Islam together with the orders given in the Quran and Hadith about his “relatives” and “Ahl al-Bayt” (siblings) caused Muslims to value and respect him from the very beginning and give a special place to their associates. This group, which was initially called by names such as “Al”, “Ahl”, “Zariyah”, “Atrat” and “Aqraba”, was later called “Sadat”, which at the same time they were called because of their sovereignty and glory in the sight of Muslims. Iranians, after converting to Islam, paid special attention to the children and grandchildren of the prophet. Signs of this attention can be observed in the presence of a significant number of memorial and burial monuments (tower-shaped tombs and blessed tombs) of the children and grandchildren of Shia imams in Iran, especially in Mazandaran, decorated with Iranian art and Shia thought.
In Iran during the Islamic era, tomb buildings are among the most numerous architectural works after mosques. The construction of these buildings with different names such as “dome”, “Madfan” (burial place) , “tomb”, “Rouzah”, “Meshhad” (place of becoming martyr), “Maqam” (position), “mausoleum”, “Beqaa”, “Astane”, “dome” , also called “Qasr” (palace) and “Imamzadeh” (son of Imam), became popular from the 4th century AH (Hejri Ghamari) and with the emergence of different local dynasties in the east and north of Iran, which coincided with the weakening of the Abbasid caliphate (Grabar, 1375: 16). 
The local rulers in the Mazandaran region, who had Shia and Alavi tendencies since the second century of Hejri, supported Shia ideas and beliefs in the following centuries. This protection in architecture was more visible in the form of tower tombs on the graves of Shia Imams.

Identified Traces 
The background of tower-shaped tombs: A tower is historically referred to as a tall and circular or polygonal building or “A tall and strong building next to a rampart with a castle or between a road for observation and guarding” (Seyd Sadr, 2001: 90). Sometimes the towers are built as a sign on the graves of the prominent and great figures which are actually considered a kind of tomb. In fact, here, in addition to the function of observation, the function of being seen by the tower itself is mentioned; tomb towers with different forms and shapes were able to demonstrate the effects of different goals and functions in their usages (Pirnia, 1383: 170).
Mausoleums (Shrines) in Kojur: Tomb buildings (shrines) in Kojur and their investigation can clarify many cases and answer most of the surrounding questions. The appearance, structure, materials used, the spaces employed, the dome and the inscriptions of the building represent the existence of a close historical-cultural relationship between the people of the region and their contemporary conditions. Tombs such as the tomb of Seyyed Mohammad Kia Sultan (Imamzadeh Debir Salehani), the tomb of two Imamzadeh Tahir and Motahar (Malek Kiyomarth bin Bistun), which are mentioned in detail as an example.
Tahir and Motahar tomb tower (King Kiyomarth bin Bistun): This building is located in the southwest of Hazar Khal village, near the Kojur-Salehan asphalt road. The cemetery of the people of Khachak and Hazar Khal villages surrounds the building due to the sanctity and respect they have for it, and some of the gravestones in the mentioned cemetery are dated between 1290-1309 AH (Hejri Ghamari).
Mausoleum of Seyyed Mohammad Kia Sultan: Geographical location of Seyed Mohammad Kia Sultan (Imamzadeh Debir Salehani) tomb (registration number 3659). The mausoleum of Seyed Mohammad Kia Sultan, known as Imamzadeh Debir Salehani, is located on the east side of Kojur district and Salehan village.

Conclusion 
Regarding the interaction of Iranian art and Shia ideas in Islamic architecture (in general) and religious monuments (tower-shaped tombs) of Islamic mysticism and Sufism, various opinions have been expressed so far and each of which represents a corner of the mellifluous works of Iranian architects; that the speakers of these ideas have accompanied with it from their perspective. Since artistic understanding, like mystical perception, has a taste and personal aspect, according to the author of these lines, it can be concluded that this collection as an architectural work in its form, space and function has characteristics derived from the fundamentals of Islamic mysticism and wisdom. These characteristics and features have been influential both in the formation of the buildings’ figure and decorations and in the formation of internal and external spaces.
Considering the function, it can be said that this collection, which is basically designed for a religious-mystical function, in addition to providing this function considerably has a mystical function and the forms, spaces and architectural decorations in this collection are a kind of reflection of the mystical meanings and they are specific to Shia mysticism; such as asceticism, love, unity and guardianship.  The demonstration of these concepts can be seen most of all in the decorations and the way of spatial communication of this collection.
Taking a look at the decorations used in these monuments indicates the Shia thinking of the Muslim artist in the form of motifs, decorations and inscriptions. Along with the verses and hadiths that reflect the Shia vision. Patterns of trees, birds, and so on are also a reflection of Shia thought and mind. Among the most important manifestations of this, the following can be listed: the use of geometric, plant and animal motifs with mystical symbolic concepts; in the decorations, the use of mystical symbolic colors, respecting the hierarchy of entry into the tomb of this collection in addition to showing the art and mysticism of architects and masters, it also represents the political, social and artistic beliefs of the society. These buildings as a whole, in all their components have symbols indicating the influence of mysticism, especially Shia mysticism.
Full-Text [PDF 1335 kb]   (360 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Interdisciplinary
Received: 2021/10/20 | Accepted: 2021/12/28 | Published: 2024/05/30

References
1. - اعتماد‌السلطنه، (1373). التدوین فی احوال جبال شروین. تصحیح: مصطفی احمدزاده. تهران: انتشارات فکر روز.
2. - آلپائو‌نوولو، آدریانو، و دیگران، (1384). معماری بومی. تهران: فضا.
3. - الکساندر، کریستوفر، (1393). سرشت نظم. جلد دوم، ترجمه: رضا سیروس صبری و علی اکبری. تهران: پرهام نقش.
4. - بهلولی‌نیری، بهزاد، (1391). «مقابر برجی سده‌های میانی ایران». نشریه کتاب ماه هنر، 173: 67-64. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1082626.
5. - بیگدلی، حامد؛ و ترابی، زهره، (1397). «بررسی ماهیت معماری برجهای آرامگاهی شهرستان ایجرود». نشریۀ معماری شناسی، 1(4): 35. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1917601.
6. - پیترسون، آندرو؛ و نصرتی، مسعود، (1377). «گسترۀ معماری اسلامی در ایران». کیهان فرهنگی، 147. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/journal-number/27437
7. - پیرنیا، محمد کریم، (1395). آشنایی با معماری اسلامی ایران. تهران: دانشگاه علم و صنعت.
8. - ستوده، منوچهر، (1374). از آستارا تا استرآباد (آثار و بناهای مازندران غربی). جلد سوم، چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات معاونت فرهنگی وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد و انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی.
9. - سیدصدر، سیدابوالقاسم، (1381). دایره‌المعارف معماری و شهرسازی. تهران: نشر آزاده.
10. - سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری کشور، (1386). معاونت حفظ و احیاء، گروه تعیین حریم سازمان، فهرست بناهای ثبت‌شده استان مازندران.
11. - صالحی‌امیری، سیدرضا، (1395). مفاهیم و نظریه‌های فرهنگی. تهران: ققنوس.
12. - طاهباز، منصوره، (1390). اصول طراحی معماری هم‌ساز با اقلیم در ایران با رویکرد به معماری مسجد. تهران: دانشگاه شهید‌بهشتی.
13. - عسگری، سپیده، (1380). «معماری محلی مازندران (سه امام‌زاده شهر ساری)». نشریه وقف میراث جاویدان، 33 و 34: 120-91. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/280272
14. - کبیری، کامبیز، (1386). «بنای سنگی میدانک، برج‌مقبره‌ای در سرزمین رویان». نشریۀ باستان‌پژوهی، 15: 57-46. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/280272
15. - کیانی، محمدیوسف، (1374). تاریخ هنر معماری ایران در دورۀ اسلامی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
16. - کراوچ، دوراپ؛ و جانسون، (1390). سنت در معماری. ترجمۀ محمدتقی فرامرزی، تهران: نشر آثار هنری متن.
17. - گرابار، الگ، (1375). «اولین بنا‌های یادبودی اسلامی». ترجمه: کلود کرباسی. نشریه اثر، شمارۀ 17: 59-16. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/309552
18. - گودرزی، یوسف؛ و شفیعی‌امرئی، سیدمحمد، (1399). «فرم‌شناسی معماری برج‌مقبره‌ها در استان مازندران دوران حکومت صفویه تا قاجار». چهارمین مجمع توسعه فناوری و کنفرانس بین‌المللی یافته‌های نوین عمران معماری و صنعت ساختمان ایران.
19. - معماریان، غلامحسین، (1384). سیری در مبانی نظری معماری. تهران: سروش دانش.
20. - مرعشی، ظهیرالدین، (1368). تاریخ طبرستان و رویان و مازندران. به اهتمام: برنهارد دادن، ترجمۀ یعقوب آژند، تهران: نشر گستره.
21. - موسوی‌کوهپر، سیدمهدی، و عباس‌نژاد‌سرستی، رحمت، (1386). «معرفی چند مقبره برجی‌شکل رویان کهن». نشریۀ اثر، 42 و 43: 77-65. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/370202
22. - هاشمی‌زرج‌آباد، حسن، (1386). «نقش و جایگاه مقابر برجی مازندران غربی در معماری اسلامی». نشریۀ کتاب ماه هنر، 103 و 104: 70-64. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/484784
23. - هال، ادواردتی، (1390)، زبان خاموش. ترجمه: علی نمازیان، تهران: دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی.
24. - نظری‌ارشد، رضا، (1384). «بناهای آرامگاهی همدان در دورۀ اسلامی». نشریۀ اثر، 38 و 39: 345-324. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/370162
25. - نقره‌کار، عبدالحمید، (1387). درآمدی بر هویت اسلامی در معماری و شهرسازی. تهران: وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی و شرکت طرح و نشر سیما.
27. - Alexander, Ch., (2013) Serasht Nazm. (Volume 2), Translated by: Reza Siros Sabri and Ali Akbari, Tehran: Parham Naqsh. (In Persian).
28. - Alpao Novello, A. et al., (1384). Baemi architecture. Tehran: Space. (In Persian).
29. - Asgari, S., (2010). “Local architecture of Mazandaran (three Imamzadehs of Sari city)”. Journal of Waqf Miras Javidan, 33 & 34: 120-91. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/280272. (In Persian).
30. - Bigdeli, H. & Torabi, Z., (2017). “Investigation of the architectural nature of the tower-shaped tombs of Ijerud city”. Journal of Architecture, 4: 44-35. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1917601. (In Persian).
31. - Bohlouli Niri, B., (2011). “Tower tombs of the middle centuries of Iran”. Kitab Mah Honar, 173: 67-64. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1082626. (In Persian).
32. - Crouch, D. & Johnson, (2016). Tradition in architecture. Translation and publication of text works of art. (In Persian).
33. - Etamad al-Sultaneh, (1373). Al-Tadwin Fi Akhval Jabal Shervin. corrected by: Mostafa Ahmadzadeh, Tehran: Fekre Rooz (Thought of the day) Publications. (In Persian).
34. - Godarzi, Y. & Shafi'i Amrai, S. M., (2019). “Architectural morphology of tomb towers in Mazandaran province during Safavid to Qajar period”. The 4th Technology Development Forum and International Conference on New Findings of Civil Architecture and Construction Industry of Iran. (In Persian).
35. - Grabar, E., (1375). The first Islamic monuments. Translated by: Claude Kiriasi, Scientific, Technical and Artistic Quarterly, Iran's Cultural Heritage Organization, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian).
36. - Grabar, E., (1996). “The First Islamic Monuments”. Translated by: Claude Karbasi. Asar Journal, 17: 16-59. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/309552. (In Persian).
37. - Hall, E., (2010). Silent language. Translated by: Ali Namazian, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. (In Persian).
38. - Hashemi Zarajabad, H., (2016). “The role and position of the tower tombs of western Mazandaran in Islamic architecture”. The Moon of Art book Journal, 103 & 104, March and April: 74-70. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/484784. (In Persian).
39. - Higgins, C. & Beyer, R., (2008). Environmental planning for land development. Translated by: Seyed Hossein Bahraini and Keyvan Karimi. Tehran: University of Tehran. (In Persian).
40. - Kayani, M. Y., (1334). The History of Iranian Architectural Art in the Islamic Period. Tehran: Samt Publications. (In Persian).
41. - Kenney, S. F., (1994). CULTURAL INFLUENCES ON ARCHITECTURE. https://ttuir.tdl.org/ttu-ir.bitstream/handle/2346.
42. - Marashi, Z. al-D., (1368). The history of Tabaristan, Royan and Mazandaran. Translated by: Yaqub Azhand, Tehran: Gosrate Publishing House.
43. - Memarian, Gh. H., (1384). A look in the theoretical foundations of architecture. Tehran: Soroush Danesh. (In Persian).
44. - Mousavi Kohpar, S. M. & Abbasnejad Sarasti, R., (2006). “Introduction of several tower-shaped tombs of ancient Royan”. Eshar Journal, 42 & 43: 65-77. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/370202. (In Persian).
45. - Nazari Arshad, R., (1384). “Hamadan Tomb Buildings in the Islamic Period”. Asar Journal, 38 & 39: 345-324. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/370162 (In Persian).
46. - Noghrekar, A. H., (1387). Introduction to Islamic identity in architecture and urban planning. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development and Sima Design and Publishing Company. (In Persian).
47. - Organization of cultural heritage and tourism of the country, (2006). Deputy of Preservation and Revitalization, Department of Organization Privacy, List of Registered Buildings of Mazandaran Province. (In Persian).
48. - Pirnia, H., (Moshir al-Douleh) (1362). Ancient Iran. Tehran: World Book. (In Persian).
49. - Pirnia, M. K., (1371). Getting to know the Islamic architecture of Iran. Tehran, University of Science and Technology. (In Persian).
50. - Ptreson, A. & Nosrati, M., (1377). “Scope of Islamic rchitecture in Iran”. Kahan Farhangi, 147. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/journal-number/27437. (In Persian).
51. - Salehi Amiri, S. R., (2015). Cultural concepts and theories. Tehran: Ghoghnous publications. (In Persian).
52. - Seyed Sadr, S. A., (1381). Encyclopedia of Architecture and Urban Planning. first edition, Tehran: Azadeh Publishing House. (In Persian).
53. - Tahbaz, M., (2012). The principles of architectural design compatible with the climate in Iran with an approach to mosque architecture. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. (In Persian).
54. - Tiwari, S. & et al., (2016). Cultures in Development Conservation of Vemacular Architecture. www.kailashkut.com/wpcontent/uploads/2016/05/.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.