logo
year 8, Issue 29 (12-2024)                   Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2024, 8(29): 129-152 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tahmasebi F, Rezaloo R, Maroufi Aghdam E, Sarhadi L. (2024). “Clay processing Building” in Yelsuie Germi Castle, an Unknown Structure from the Middle Ages of Islam. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 8(29), 129-152. doi:10.22034/PJAS.8.29.129
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-630-en.html
1- PhD student in Archeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran (Corresponding Author) , Reza_rezaloo@yahoo.com
3- PhD in Archaeology, General Directorate of Education, Bukan County, West Azerbaijan, Iran.
Abstract:   (1019 Views)
Abstract
Archaeological excavations in Yelsuie Germi Castle, very rich findings and valuable documents such as pottery, architecture and other handicrafts were identified and excavated from under a mound of soil that can play an important role in the detailed analysis of this area. One of these landmarks is an unknown structure with complex architecture and building elements located on the hills of the castle near the Sambur Chay River. This building has sections and spaces of four corners that the presence of water conduction paths into the building on the walls and water outlet channels in the floor, has increased the importance of the building and has made it more difficult to identify and evaluate the main function of the building. In this regard, the present research is descriptive-analytical and based on field studies and review of library documents, while identifying and introducing the mentioned building, seeks to find a logical answer to the following questions: What is the usage of the unknown building of Yelsuie Castle and how did it work? What era does the unknown building of Yelsuie Castle belong to? Studies were carried out show that the unknown building is due to the presence of ponds and inlets and outlets water conduction paths was in association with water usage, which is probably used for the preparation and processing of clay, and accordingly by the authors, The name of the building is called “clay processing building”. On the other hand, the study of pottery obtained from different spaces of this building and its comparison with other areas, confirms that this building belongs to the Islamic Middle Ages and the Seljuk period.
Keywords: Germi, Yelsuie Castle, Clay Processing Building, Pottery, Medieval Islam.

Introduction
The current research method is based on a descriptive-analytical and historical approach and its data collection is in the form of library and field studies and archaeological excavations in the area. According to this, at first, the whole building and its various spaces have been drawn, designed and three-dimensional with the help of various software; Also, in order to achieve the most accurate information and general analysis of the building, the obtained pottery from inside the brick building has been compared and matched with the pottery works of other areas of the Islamic era. The ancient place of Yelsuie Castle in the Ingot section of Germi city consists of a small castle on top of a high natural hill and a residential area located in its southwestern part. Yelsuie Castle is located in the watercourse of Sambur Chay River. Easy access to river water resources as well as the precipice situation in the southern and eastern part of the hill on which the castle was built, is one of the most important strategic features that has been influential in choosing this place to form such an area. In general, this area can be considered as one of the most key Islamic area in northwestern Iran. The brick building is located on the eastern side of the castle and on the watercourse of the Sambur Chay River. In this regard, in order to identify this brick building, a workshop called Workshop No. 4 was created in this part of the area by the excavation team. While continuing the excavation process, a brick building with special architecture and unknown usage was discovered. The mentioned building has an almost rectangular plan that includes several spaces inside. The main materials used in the structure of this building are bricks with gypsum and lime mortar, and in some parts, especially in the outer parts of the building, river rubble has been used. The walls of the brick building are completely smooth and flat and are made with an average width of 50 cm and the height of all of them is the same and is about 70 cm.

Discussion
In general, according to the general structure of the brick building, the most reasonable usage for this architecture is being a pottery workshop and processing and preparing clay in it. One of the most important steps before making pottery is to find the right clay or grinding clay, without clods and other materials. Therefore, for this purpose, it is necessary for the pottery clay to be well shaped, sifted, cleaned and prepared. It seems that small ponds that are embedded lengthwise in different parts of the brick building; Along with water inlet and outlet channels, they are made for just such a use.  In fact, in this building, water is directed into these ponds and collected in them through small canals that are embedded on the walls. After filling them, in the next stage, the clay, which was suitable for pottery, was mixed with water inside these basins and became a slurry. While mixing the clay with water, the water flow is redirected into these ponds again, and during this operation, the excess material inside of the soil as well as other additional materials are poured out of the ponds along with the excess water into large side spaces. And was led out  of the building by floor channels. Also, the grains of sand that may have been inside the clay, due to the weight of the bottom of the ponds and the parts that are embedded in the bottom of the floor, were deposited. After doing this, the water flow was cut off and the produced clay was deposited in the ponds for a few days and remained there until it was soft and smooth and so-called settled. After a few days, the prepared clay was collected and transferred to pottery workshops and then to pottery kilns. 

Conclusion
In fact, it should be added that the existence of various pottery in various forms, styles and techniques in Yelsuie Castle indicates the possible presence of pottery kilns in this site, which also confirms the fact that the brick building is a workshop for producing high quality clay. On the surface of Yelsuie Castle, there are limited traces of pottery balls that indicate the presence of pottery kilns in the area, so that with the help of these balls, the temperature of the kilns was regulated. In this article, 3 maps and 13 images including the castle itself, its geographical location, as well as the brick building and its various parts are given. Also, in two tables, the types of obtained pottery from the brick building are displayed, and in another table, similar samples of obtained pottery from other sites of the Islamic period in other parts of Iran have been compared and matched. According to potteries and other artifacts, the date and time of construction of this building should be belong to the Middle Ages of Islam and the Seljuk era.
Full-Text [PDF 2886 kb]   (167 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2022/09/7 | Accepted: 2022/12/4 | Published: 2024/12/21

References
1. - امیرحاجلو، سعید؛ و سقایی، سارا، (1397). «گسترش و تنوع گونه‌های سفال دوران اسلامی در سکونت‌گاه‌های دشت نرماشیر کرمان». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 19 (8): 207 - 226. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2019.17433.1823
2. - امیرحاجلو، سعید؛ و صدیقیان، حسین، (1399). «مطالعۀ باستان‌شناختی سفال‌های دوران اسلامی محوطۀ قلعه‌سنگ، شهر قدیم سیرجان». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 25 (10): 155- 180. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2020.18449.1896
3. - بلمکی، بهزاد؛ و مترجم، عباس، (1388). «بررسی باستان‌شناختی شهرستان بهار». آرشیو اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی استان همدان، (منتشر نشده).
4. - چوبک، حمیده، (1391)، «سفالینه‌های دورۀ اسلامی شهر کهن جیرفت». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 4 (1): 83-112. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2012.35377
5. - حسینی، سیدهاشم؛ رضالو، رضا؛ و آیرملو، یحیی، (1394). «مطالعۀ تطبیقی-تحلیلی نقوش سفالینه‌های آقکند با نقوش منسوجات قرن‌های چهارم تا ششم هجری‌قمری». مطالعات تطبیقی هنر، 6 (11): 115-129. DOR: 20.1001.1.23453842.1395.6.11.6.9
6. - خدادوست، جواد؛ موسوی‌حاجی، رسول؛ تقوی، عابد؛ و پورعلی‌یاری، شهین، (1396). «بررسی و مطالعۀ تحلیلی سفالینه‌های محوطۀ مالین، شهرستان باخرز (خراسان رضوی)». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 13 (7): 157 -172 . https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2017.6934.1289
7. - دژم‌خوی، مریم، (1386)، «نظری اجمالی به سفال قالب‌زده عصر سلجوقی». باستان‌پژوهی، 9 (15): 27 - 31.
8. - رضانژاد، حسین، (1380). «شناخت و معرفی سفال‌های ارگ تابران توس». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه تهران، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، تهران، (منتشر نشده).
9. - رنجبران، محمدرحیم، (1391). «گزارش نهایی فصل اول و دوم، دور چهارم کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی تپه هگمتانه». اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌‌دستی و گردشگری استان همدان، (منتشر نشده).
10. - رهبر، مهدی، (1391). «گزارش سومین فصل گمانه‌زنی در نهاوند به‌منظور شناسایی معبد لائودیسه». آرشیو اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی استان همدان، (منتشر نشده).
11. - زنداقطاعی، نادیا؛ و رازانی، مهدی، (1393). «ساختارشناسی و فن‌شناسی سفالینه‌های بدون لعاب قالبی از شهر دقیانوس متعلق به دورۀ سلجوقی». مجموعه مقالات همایش حفاظت و مرمت اشیای تاریخی - فرهنگی و تزئینات وابسته به معماری، پژوهشکدۀ حفاظت و مرمت، اسفند: 1- 12.
12. - شراهی، اسماعیل؛ و صدیقیان، حسین، (1398). «مطالعه باستان‌شناسی سفال‌های قرون میانی اسلامی دست‌کند زیرزمینی تهیق خمین». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، 8 (3): 141- 158. https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.3.8.141
13. - کریمی، فاطمه؛ و کیانی، محمدیوسف، (1364). هنر سفالگری دورۀ اسلامی. چاپ اول، تهران: وزارت ارشاد اسلامی،
14. - محمدی، مریم؛ و شعبانی، محمد، (1395). «معرفی و تحلیل سفالینه‌های دوران اسلامی محوطۀ زینوآباد-بهار همدان». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی، 11 (6): 135-150. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2016.1744
15. - مهجور، فیروز؛ و صدیقیان، حسین، (1388). «بررسی سفال‌های اسلامی محوطۀ مشکین‌ تپه پرندک در استان مرکزی». مجله پیام باستان‌شناس، 3 (12): 105- 120.
16. - نیک‌گفتار، احمد، (1391). «گزارش فصل پنجم شهر تاریخی بلقیس اسفراین». آرشیو پایگاه شهر بلقیس، اسفراین، (منتشر نشده).
17. - همتی‌ازندریانی، اسماعیل؛ خاکسار، علی؛ و شعبانی، محمد، (1394). «بررسی و تحلیل سفال‌های دورۀ اسلامی مجموعه معماری دست‌کند زیرزمینی سامن ملایر». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 13 (7): 189-206. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2017.6622.1275
18. - ولایتی، رحیم، (1396)، «گزارش کاوش و گمانه‌زنی به‌منظور تعیین عرصه و حریم شهر تاریخی اوجان». آذربایجان شرقی، (منتشر نشده).
20. - Amir Hajloo, S. & Saghaei, S., (2018). “Development and diversity of pottery species of the Islamic era in the settlements of Narmashir plain in Kerman”. Archaeological Research, 19 (8): 207 – 226. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2019.17433.1823 (In Persian)
21. - Amir Hajloo, S. & Sidighiyan, H., (2020). “Archaeological study of pottery of the Islamic period in Qala-e-Sang area. Old city of Sirjan”. Archaeological Research, 25 (10): 155- 180. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2020.18449.1896 (In Persian)
22. - Belmaki, B. & Motarjem, A., (2009). “Archaeological study of Bahar city”. Archive of the General Directorate of Cultural Heritage of Hamadan Province. (Unpublished), (In Persian)
23. - Chubak, H., (2012). “Islamic pottery of ancient city of Jiroft”. Archaeological studies, 4 (1): 83 – 112. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2012.35377 (In Persian)
24. - Dezhmkhuie, M., (2007). “A brief look at the molded pottery of the Seljuk era”. Bastan‌ Pazhohi, 19 (15): 27 – 31(In Persian)
25. - Hemmati Azandariani, E., Khaksar, A. & Shabani, M., (2015). “Studying and Analyzing the Islamic Potteries from Underground Troglodytic Architecture Complex at Samen, Malayer”. Archaeological Research, 13 (7): 189-206 (In Persian)
26. - Hosseini, S. H., Rezaloo, R. & Ayramlu, Y., (2016). “A Comparative- Analytical Study of Pottery Patterns of Aghkand with the Textile Patterns of 4th-6th Centuries AH”. Motaleate-e Tatbighi-e Honar, 6 (11): 115 -129. DOR: 20.1001.1.23453842.1395.6.11.6.9 (In Persian)
27. - Karimi, F. & Kiani, M. Y., (1985). The Art of Pottery of the Islamic Period. First Edition, Tehran: Ministry of Islamic Guidance Printing House. (In Persian)
28. - Khodadoost, J., Mousavi Haji, R., Taghavi. A. & Pourali Yari, S., (2015). “An Analytical Study of the Pottery at the Malin Site (Bakharz)”. Archaeological Research of Iran, 13 (7): 157 – 172. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2017.6934.1289 (In Persian)
29. - Mahjoor, F. & Siddiqian, H., (2009). “Study of Islamic pottery in Meshkintapeh area of Parandak in Markazi province”. Payam – Bastanshenas, 12: 105 – 120. (In Persian)
30. - Mohammadi, M. & Shabani, M., (2016). “Introduction and analysis of pottery of the Islamic era in Zinoabad – Bahar erea of Hamadan”. Archaeological research, 11(6): 135 – 150. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2016.1744 (In Persian)
31. - Nick Goftar, A., (2012). “Report of the fifth chapter of the historical city of Belqis Esfarayen”. Archive of Belqis city base, Esfarayen, (Unpublished). (In Persian)
32. - Rahbar, M., (2012). “Report of the third chapter of speculation in Nahavand in order to identify the Laodicean temple”. Archive of the General Directorate of Cultural Heritage of Hamadan Province, (Unpublished). (In Persian)
33. - Ranjbaran, M. R., (2012). “The final report of the first and second chapters, the fourth round of archaeological excavations in Hegmataneh Hill. General Directorate of Cultural Heritage”. Handicrafts and Tourism of Hamadan Province, (Unpublished). (In Persian)
34. - Rezanejad, H., (2001). “Recognition and introduction of Tabaran Toos citadel pottery”. Master Thesis, University of Tehran. Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Tehran, (Unpublished). (In Persian)
35. - Schnyder, R., (1991). “Mediaveal incised and carved wares from north west iran”. in the Art of Iran and Anatolia: 85 – 94
36. - Sharahi, E. & Sedighiyan, H., (2019). “Archaeological study of medieval Islamic pottery in the underground part of Tahiq Khomeini”. Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies, 8 (3): 151-14. https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.3.8.141 (In Persian)
37. - Soustiel, J., (1985). La Ceremique Islamique. Fribourg, Office du livre.
38. - Treptow, T., (2007). Daily life ornamented the mediaeval Persian city of Reyy. Chicago, The oriental institute museum of the University of Chicag.
39. - Velayati, R., (2017). “Exploration and speculation report to determine the area and privacy of the historic city of Ojan”. East Azerbaijan, (Unpublished). (In Persian)
40. - Wilkinson, C. K., (1973). Nishapur: Pottery of the early Islamic period. New York, The Metropolitan Museum of art.
41. - Zandagtaei, N. & Razani, M., (2014). “Structure and technology of unglazed pottery from the city of Decianus belonging to the Seljuk period”. Proceedings of the Conference on the Preservation and Restoration of Historical-Cultural Objects and Decorations Related to Architecture Restoration: 1- 12 (In Persian)

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.