logo
year 5, Issue 17 (12-2021)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2021, 5(17): 167-189 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nami H, Mousavinia S M. (2021). Description, Classification and Typology of the Parthian Potteries of ShahrTappeh, Dargaz. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 5(17), : 9 doi:10.30699/PJAS.5.17.167
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-537-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Archeology and History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Neishabour University, Neishabour, Iran. , hasan_nami20@yahoo.com
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Archeology and History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Neishabour University, Neishabour, Iran
Abstract:   (6581 Views)
Abstract
The northeast Iran has been the context of some of the most important events of the Parthian Period, in a way that one can restrict the geography of the Parthians to Pathawa and Hyrcania until before gradual expansion of the territory during Mehrdad the First (138-171 BC).One of the least-known aspects of the Parthian in the northeast region is the potteries assemblages. Pottery is the most abundant of the archaeological finds and is the most important one to understand the cultural specifics of the historical periods. The Parthian pottery is not the same throughout the whole empire and it can be grouped into several categories based on geographic regions. The pottery assemblage under study in this paper, collected from two seasons of excavations at ShahrTappeh in Dargaz, represents part of the Parthian pottery corpus of the northeast region. In current research, the pottery aasemblage of ShahrTappeh has been studied from the typological perspective and it has been tried to put forward specifics of the pottery of Parthian period of the northeast region by comparative studies of the similar assemblages.The most frequent forms amongst the pottery assemblage of ShahrTappeh are jar, pithos, handled jar, pot, caldron, trough, bowl and cup. These forms, which are seen from the early to late phase of the Parthian period, are comparable with specimens from Marv, Nisa, Qumes, Chasada, Shamshir Ghar, Ai Khanom, HasaniMahale, Tol Espid, Tappeh Yahya, Bardsir cemetery, Gowri Kohneh, Nadali, south of Baluchestan, Khorheh, Sang-e Shir cemetery, QalehEzhdahak and Bisotun. In addition, finding of some kiln waste in the second season of excavation at ShahrTappeh suggest that this site was a center for pottery production in the northeast during the Parthian period. Lack of glazed ware, rarity of the painted ware and the prevalence of the plain ware are the most characteristics of the ShahrTappeh pottery assemblage. The latter was used as common ordinary ware during the Parthian period and based on comparative studies they were parts of the pottery tradition of the Parthians. 
Keywords: The Northeast Region of Iran, Dargaz, ShahrTappeh, Pottery, Parthian Period.

Introduction
The site of ShahrTappeh is located near the town of Chapeshlow in the northeast Iran. From several aspects this site has important in archaeology of the Parthian Period: with more than 70 ha, the site of ShahrTappeh is one of the largest sites of this period in the northeast Iran; 2. The site is just 100 km, as crow flies, from the first capital of the Parthians; 3. Archaeological data, including fortifications, acropolis, sharestan (lower town), industrial quarter and cultural materials recovered from the excavations comparable with those from Nisa, suggest that the site was a city in the Parthian period; 4. Based on materials recovered from the surface and excavations, ShahrTappeh was a single-period site of the Parthian period in the northeast region. These items suggest that ShahrTappeh was one of the most important Parthian centers of the northeast region. Regarding the importance of the site of ShahrTappeh in the northeast region we try in this paper to discuss the main pottery characteristics of the site to some extent. In this line, first we have studied the pottery forms of the site and then we have chosen 89 sherd fragments and whole vessels for in-depth studies. We have tried to choose the pottery sample so that it is the representative of the whole assemblage. In the following the pottery assemblage has been divided into two classes: open forms and closed forms, and then each class has been discussed. Finally, we tried to discuss, in a separate part, the common features of the Parthian pottery of the region from this study and at the end we propose a pattern for identification and characterization of the Parthian pottery in the northeast region. 

Typology and General Characteristics of the Study Sample
From the pottery collection recovered from two seasons of excavations at ShahrTappeh, 89 pottery fragments and whole vessels were chosen for study here. At the first stage, these potteries are divided into two classes: open forms and closed forms. The closed forms of the ShahrTappeh assemblage include necked jars and simple jars, pithoi, stoups, caldrons, troughs, a vessel type known as Misagh and base fragments of the vessels. The open forms include bowls and cups. Without considering the various types of forms, the ware has some general characteristics. The pottery collection under study is all plain. No glazed ware is found in ShahrTappeh yet. Some of the sherds have incised, applique or burnished decorations. The sherds usually have mean thickness, but both thick and thin variants are also seen. The color paste covers a spectrum: buff, light orange, orange, red and gray. The color of slip ranges from buff, light buff, dark buff, greenish buff, orange buff, reddish buff, buff orange, light orange, dark orange, reddish orange, red, greenish red, buff brown, gray to greenish gray. All samples are wheel made and the temper agent used is mineral, including sand, silt and white particles. The kiln temperature was enough and all sherds were exposed to proper heat. 

Conclusion
With more than 70 ha in area, ShahrTappeh is one the largest Parthian sites of the northeast region. The important point about this site is that it is a single-period site and discussing about its finds can be pursued from this perspective. One of the most important finds of ShahrTappeh is pottery. Except typological and technical grounds, the Parthian potteries of ShahrTappeh can be assessed from the viewpoints of chronology, comparable specimens, imported potteries and local production. The potteries assemblage of ShahrTappeh is datable to the early to late Parthian period. This conclusion is based on comparative grounds. On this basis, the ShahrTappeh specimens are comparable with those of eastern Parthian Empire. The early Parthian potteries of the site are comparable with those of Nisa, Marv and Qumes. Some of the specimens are comparable with pottery from Charseda, Shamshir Ghar and Ai Khanomwhich are categorized in the Seleucid-Parthian context. Although the site established in the early Parthian period, it lasted to the end of the era. Among the potteries assemblage of ShahrTappeh there are specimens that are comparable with those from Tol Spid, Tappeh Yahya, Bardsir cemetery, Gowri Kohneh, Nadali, south of Baluchestan, Khorheh, Sang-e Shir cemetery, QalehEzhdahak and Bisotun. The pottery types of ShahrTappeh can be assessed from the import and local production viewpoints. Amongst the potteries of ShahrTappeh a burnished vessel dated to the 1st to 3rd centuries AD has been found. Existence of this specimen indicates the importation of such vessels from the southeast region to the northeast region including ShahrTappeh. On the other hand, discovery of large amounts of kiln waste suggest that the site was a manufacturing center for pottery vessels. It should be noted that as no deformed specimens were found, we cannot make comments about the local variants. In general, potteries of ShahrTappeh which are comparable with assemblages from the eastern Iran can be dated from the early to the late Parthian period. These pottery types that in which imported specimens and local production can be seen, are representatives of some of the Parthian pottery types of the northeast region. 
Article number: 9
Full-Text [PDF 1362 kb]   (610 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2021/03/4 | Accepted: 2021/05/31 | Published: 2021/12/21

References
1. - استروناخ، دیوید، (1378). گزارشی از کاوش‌های انجام‌شده توسط مؤسسۀ مطالعات ایرانی بریتانیا از سال 1961 تا 1963. ترجمۀ حمید خطیب‌شهیدی، تهران: پژوهشگاه سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، معاونت حفظ و احیاء.
2. - افشاری، لیلا؛ و نقشینه، امیرصادق، (۱۳۹۳). «توصیف، طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل گونه‌شناختی سفال‌های دورۀ اشکانی گورستان سنگ‌شیر همدان». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، شمارۀ ۷، دورۀ چهارم، پاییز و زمستان، صص: 132-113.
3. - بختیاری‌شهری، محمود، (1375). «گزارش مقدماتی بررسی و شناسایی آثار باستانی شهرستان درگز، مرحلۀ اول». تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری (منتشرنشده).
4. - خسروزاده، علیرضا، (1386). «گزارش بررسی باستان‌شناسی شهرستان بردسیر». تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی (منتشرنشده).
5. - داوری، محمدصادق؛ موسیوند، فاطمه؛ و باصفا، حسن، (۱۳۹۷). «تبیین شاخصه‌های سفالی اوایل دورۀ پارتی در حوضۀ کشف‌رود: براساس گونه‌شناسی سفال‌های تپۀ اسماعیل‌آباد مشهد». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، دورۀ ۱۰، شمارۀ ۱، صص: ۷۵-۹۴.
6. - رهبر، مهدی، (1382). سومین فصل کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی خورهه. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
7. - روستایی، محمدصادق، (1391). «مطالعۀ نمونه‌های سفالین دورۀ اشکانی در سیستان ایران». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشدباستان‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم‌انسانی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان (منتشرنشده).
8. - علی‌بیگی، سجاد، (1389). «از سرگیری پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناختی در محوطۀ پارتی بیستون». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی مدرس، سال 2، شمارۀ 3، بهار و تابستان، صص: 69-40.
9. - فلاح‌مهنه، مهدی، (۱۳۹۴). «مطالعه و تحلیل باستان‌شناسی استقرارهای دورۀ اشکانی دشت درگز». رسالۀ دکتری باستا‌‌ن‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، دانشگاه بوعلی‌سینا (منتشرنشده).
10. - قندگر، جواد؛ اسماعیلی، حسین؛ و رحمت‌پور، محمد، (1383). «کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی شمال‌غرب ایران». به‌کوشش: مسعود آذرنوش، تهران، سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری، پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی (منتشرنشده)
11. - کوثری، یحیی؛ و سرفراز، علی‌اکبر، (1345). «بررسی شمال‌شرق». تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری (منتشرنشده).
12. - لباف‌خانیکی، رجبعلی، (1387). «به یاد نگهبان، سهم دکتر نگهبان در باستان‌شناسی خراسان». باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، شمارۀ 45، صص: 103-99.
13. - مهرآفرین، رضا، (۱۳۸۶). «حفاری و گمانه‌زنی تپه‌گوری سیستان». زاهدان: مرکز اسناد اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری سیستان و بلوچستان (منتشرنشده).
14. - مهرآفرین، رضا؛ علیزاده، فاطمه؛ و شیرازی، روح‌الله، (۱۳۹۱). «سفال مکران در دورۀ اشکانی و همگونی‌های آن با مناطق همجوار». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، شمارۀ ۳، دورۀ 2، پاییز و زمستان. صص: 24-7.
15. - مهرآفرین، رضا؛ روستایی، محمدصادق؛ و علایی‌مقدم، جواد، (۱۳۹۳). «سفال داغ‌دار، سفال شاخص دورۀ اشکانی در سیستان ایران». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران. شمارۀ ۶، دورۀ 4، بهار و تابستان. صص: ۱۰۵-۱۲۰.
16. - نامی، حسن، (۱۳۹۵). «گمانه‌زنی به‌منظور تعیین عرصه و پیشنهاد حریم شهرتپۀ چاپشلو». مشهد: مرکز اسناد اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان خراسان رضوی (منتشرنشده).
17. - نامی، حسن؛ فیروزمندی، بهمن؛ و اسمعیلی‌جلودار، محمداسماعیل، (۱۳۹۶). «تحلیل و گاه‌نگاری پیشنهادی شهرتپۀ چاپشلو در شهرستان درگز، شمال‌شرق ایران». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، شمارۀ ۱۳، دورۀ 7، تابستان، صص: ۱۲۳-۱۴۲.
19. - Afshari, L. & Naghshineh. A., (2014). “Description, Classification and Analysis of Typology of the Parthian PeriodPottery of Hamedan Sang-e Shir Cemetery”. Pazhohesh-Ha-Ye Bastanshenasi Iran, No. 7 (4), Autumn and Winter, Pp: 113-132, (In Persian).‬
20. - Alibaigi, S., (2010). “Resumption of archaeological excavations at the Parthian site of Behistun”. Modares Archeological Researches, Second year, No. 3, Spring and Summer, Pp: 40-69, (In Persian).
21. - Bakhtiari Shahri, M., (1996). “Preliminary Report of the Survey and Identification of Antiquities in Dargaz County, the First Stage”. Center for Archaeological Archives of the Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, (In Persian).
22. - Bernard, P., (1967). “Ai Khanum On The Oxus: A Hellenistic City in Central Asia”. Proceeding of the British Academy, Vol LIII, Pp: 71-95.
23. - Dales, F., (1977). New Excavations at Nad-Ali (SorkhDagh). Afghanestan, Research Monogragh Series, Center for south and South-East Asia Studies, University of California.
24. - Davari, M. S. & Mousivand, F. & Basafa, H., (2018). “Explanation of Early Pottery Features in Kashafrud River Basin: Based on the typology of Potteries ofEsmail-Abad site in Mashhad”. Jounal of Archeolgical Studies, No. 10 (1), Pp: 75-94, (In Persian).
25. - Dupree, L., (1958). “Shamshir Ghar: Historic Cave site in Kandahar province Afigahanestan”. Anthropological papers of the Amirican Museum of Natural History, Vol. 46, Part 1.
26. - FallahMehne, M., (2015). “Archaeological study and analysis of Parthian settlements in DargazPlain”. PhD Diss., Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, (In Persian).
27. - Frankfort. H., (1927). Studies in Early Pottery of the Near East. II. Asia, Europe and the Agean, and their Earliest Interrelations. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Occasional Papers, London.
28. - Ghandgar, J. & Esmaeili, H. & Rahmatpour, M., (2004). “Archaeological excavations in Northwestern Iran”. Edited by: Masoud Azarnoosh, Tehran: Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Center for Archaeological Research, (In Persian).
29. - Haerinck, E., (1983). “La céramiqueen Iran pendant la périodeparthe (ca. 250 av. J. C. à ca. 225 après J. C.). Typologie, chronologie et distribution”. Iranica Antiqua Supplé‌ment 2, Ghent.
30. - Hansman, J. & Stronach, D., (1974). “Excavation at Shahri Qumis 1971”. The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, No. 106, Pp: 8-22.
31. - Herrmann, G.; Kurbansakhatov, K. & Simpson, S. J., (2001). “The International Merv Project Preliminary Report on the ninth Year (2000)”. IRAN, Vol. 39, Pp: 9-52.
32. - Invernizzi, A. & Lippolis, C., (2006). NISA PARTICA, Ricerhe Nel Complesso Monumentale Arsacide 1990- 2006. Le lettere, Firenze.
33. - Kaim, B., (2008). “The Parthian Settlement in the SerakhsOvasis”. Parthica, No. 10, Pp: 129- 134.
34. - Khosrowzadeh, A., (2007). “Archaeological Survey of Bardsir County: A Report”, Tehran: Center for Archaeological Archives, (In Persian).
35. - Kleiss, W., (1970). “Zur Topographic Des PartherHanges in Bistun”. AMI, n, f, 3. Pp: 133-168.
36. - Kohl, Ph. & Heskel, D. L., (1980). “Archaeological Reconnaissanceinthe Darreh Gaz Plain: A Short Report”. IRAN, Vol. 18, Pp: 160-172.
37. - Kosari, Y. & Sarfaraz, A., (1966). “Survey of North East”. Tehran: The Archives of the Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, (In Persian).
38. - Labaf Khaniki, R., (2008). “In memory of Neghaban, Dr. Neghaban’s contribution to the archeology of Khorasan”. Iranian Journal of Archaeology and History, No. 45. Pp: 99-103, (In Persian).
39. - Lamberg-Karlovski, C. C. L., (1970). Excavations at Tepeyahya, Iran. Bulletin of American School of prehistoric Research 27, Cambridge, M A: Peabody museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.
40. - MehrAfarin, R., (2007). “Excavation and test-pitting in Goori Tepe, Sistan”. Zahedan: The Archives of the Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism of Sistan and Balochistan Province, (In Persian).
41. - Mehrafarin, R.; Musavi Haji, S. R. & Alifeyz, S., (2011). “A Study of the seramics of East Iran During the Later Parthian Era with Special Reference to Tapa Gowri”. Central Asiatic Journal International Periodical for the Languages, Literature, History and Archaeology of Central Asia, No. 55 (2), Pp: 240–258.
42. - MehrAfarin, R. & Alizadeh, F. and Shirazi, R., (2012). “Parthian Pottery of Mokran and its Similarity with Neighboring Regions”. Pazhohesh-Ha-Ye Bastanshenasi Iran, No. 3 (2), Autumn & Winter, Pp: 7-24, (In Persian).
43. - MehrAfarin, R. and Roustaei M.S. and AlayeMoghadam, J., (2014). “Burnished War, the Diagnostic Pottery of the Parthian Period of Sistan, Iran”. Pazhohesh-Ha-Ye Bastanshenasi Iran, No. 6 (4), Spring and Summer, Pp: 105-120, (In Persian).
44. - Nami, H., (2016). “Test-pitting in order to determine the core area and suggest the buffer zone of Shahr-Tepe inChapeshlu”. Mashhad: The Archives of the Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism of Razavi Khorasan Province, (In Persian).‬‬.
45. - Nami, H.; Firouzmandi, B. & Esmaeili Jelodar, M., (2017). “Analyzing and Dating in North-East Iran: Proposed Parthian City of Shahr-Tappeh, Chapeshlou Township inDargaz”. Pazhohesh-Ha-Ye Bastanshenasi Iran, No. 13 (7), Summer, Pp: 123-142, (In Persian).‬‬‬
46. - Napier, G. & Kazi, C. S. A., (1876). “Extracts from a Diary of a Tour in Khorassan, and Notes on the Eastern Alburz Tract;with Notes on the Yomut Tribe”. Journal of the Royal GeographicalSociety of London, No. 46, Pp: 62-171.
47. - Potts, D. T. & Roustaei, K., (2006). The Mamasani Archaeological Project Stage One: a report on the first two seasons of the ICAR-University of Sydney expedition to the Mamasani District, Fars Province, Iran. Tehran: Iranian Center for Archaeological Research.
48. - Rahbar, M., (2003). “Archaeological excavations at Khorhe: The third season”.Tehran: Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, (In Persian).
49. - Rawlinson, S. H., (1879). The Road to Merv. Royal Geographical Society, London.
50. - Roustaei, ‬ M. S., (2012). “Study of the Parthian Period Pottery Samples in Iranian Sistan”. MA thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of SistanandBaluchestan, (In Persian).
51. - Sono, T. & Fukai, S., (1968). Dailaman, III, The excavations at HassaniMahale and Hjalekuti, 1964. Insitute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
52. - Stronach, D., (1999). Pasargadae: A report on the excavations conducted by the British Institute of Persian Studies from 1961 to 1963. Translated by: Hamid KhatibShahidi, Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Central Research Laboratory for the Conservation and Restoration, (In Persian).
53. - Trinkaus, K. M., (1981). The Partho – Sassanian Northeast Frontier: Settlement in the Damghan Plan, Iran. a Dissertation in Anthropology of the University of Pennsylvania.
54. - Usmanova. Z. I., (1992). “New Material on Ancient Merv, Iran”. Jornal of the British Institute of Persian Stadies, No. 30 (1), Pp: 55–63.
55. - Wheeler, S. M., (1962). Charsada. Oxford University Press, London.
56. - Усманова, З. И., (1963). “Эрк-кала (поматериалам ЮТАКЭ 1955-1959 гг)”.ТЮТАКЭ, No. XI, Pp: 20-94.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.