logo
year 5, Issue 15 (6-2021)                   Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2021, 5(15): 95-114 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sharifi M. (2021). Evidence of Late Bronze age in Zab Basin, Based on Archaeological Excavation of Akhoran. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 5(15), 95-114. doi:10.30699/PJAS.5.15.95
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-388-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Prehistoric Archeology, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism (RICHT), Tehran, Iran. , mhsharifi588@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5341 Views)
Abstract
The Zab River basin contains the cities of Piranshahr and Sardasht in West Azerbaijan and parts of the city of Baneh in Kurdistan. The Zab River rises from the Northwest highlands of Piranshahr and after joining many branches passes through the highlands of Alan in Iran and enters Iraq. The extension of this basin is a relatively vertical strip along the Iran-Iraq border and the Little Zab River. Its orientation is Northwest to southeast and from west to east. The Zab Basin is located in an area with a cold and temperate mountainous climate, a Mediterranean rainfall regime, with average annual temperatures between 11.7°C and 13. 3°C and, 700 ml annual rainfall (Hojabri et al 95). This article tries to answer the question of how the cultural relations between this point and other areas of the presence of the late bronze culture have been established by studying the cultural materials belonging to the late bronze cultural tradition in Akhoran tepe. Also, what was the chronology of the stables? The results of archaeological excavations led to the identification of a late Bronze Age camp. The study of Akhoran cultural materials also indicates the presence of a late bronze pottery tradition. Studies and relative chronology of pottery showed that most of the cultural interactions and influences were with Hasanlu regions and outside the borders of Iran with Anatolia and Iraqi Kurdistan. The present study is based on archaeological excavations and then library studies and with a descriptive-analytical approach tries to introduce new pottery of the late Bronze Age.
Keywords: Northwest of Iran, Late Bronze Age, Zab Basin, Akhoran Tepe, Archaeological Excavation, East of Anatoli.

Introduction
The Bronze Age is considered to be the beginning of major social changes in the early third millennium BC. The Hasanlu VI period or the Middle Bronze Age covers from 2100 to 1700 BC (Danti 2013:332 .Table 17.1). During this period, multi-colored and painted wares were commonly used in large parts of Azerbaijan (Dyson 1969). Hasanlu VI ceramic designs were in crossed, checkered, and triangle forms (Dyson 1965). The simple painted pottery, which is the characteristic of the Middle of the 2nd millennium BC, is the same as synchronously identified dishes of Khabur from Northern Mesopotamia and South West Turkey (Dyson 1969: 43-44). Our information on late bronze age in northwest Iran is quite limited. Hasanlu V, is of great importance in this region, but the period has been given relatively little attention. We therefore selected Akhoran Tepe for excavation with the goal of closing this chronological gap in our understanding of Iranian prehistory.
As a local center, the Zab basin generally witnessed the alternation of contacts and conflicts, as is evidenced by the varying patterns in the distribution of recorded sites. Unlike what is characteristic of Mesopotamia and southern Iran in the fourth millennium BC, it has not yet produced any traces of extended settlements and social complexities. 
Previous studies have illustrated that northwest Iran maintained contacts with regions south of Caucasia and the valleys hemmed in by the Aras and Kura rivers to the north, the Central Zagros to the south, and eastern Anatolia and north Mesopotamia to the west via mountain passes. 
Recent archaeological data from the adjacent neighboring regions has corroborated this observation. Therefore, serious investigation in the region has the potential to shed light on broad cultural interactions and evolutions in the middle and northern Middle East. 
The data from Akhoran is thus of considerable importance in this respect, and can improve our understanding of regional and inter-regional interactions. A foremost purpose of this paper is to look into the ties and connections between Akhoran and northwest Iran as a whole, and to explore intra- and inter-regional interactions.
One of our fundamental problems in North West Iran was the lack of excavations, with little information about the Archaeology of the region. The current paper focuses on Akhoran Tepe since we have had a little knowledge about the late Bronze Age in the Little Zab River. 

Archaeological Background
North West Iran has a particular Archeological importance since it accumulates different prehistoric periods. The area is also important from the point of view of Archeological literature since it is at a crossroad facilitating the passing of nations and trading. With regard to the history, the basin is among those that attracted the attention of domestic and foreign scholars at the dawn of professional Archaeology in Iran (Motarjem Sharifi 2014: 50).
A long-lasting Hasanlu Project started by the Museum of the University of Pennsylvania in 1956 under the guidance of Robert H. Dyson, is the most significant work carried out in this basin (Dyson, 1968; 1969). On the other hand, the work at Yanik Tepe, the Northeastern basin of the lake began in 1960 by Charles Burney that furnished important details, among them the identification of the Trans-Caucasian culture’s infiltration into Northwestern Iran (Burney 1961; 1962; 1964). Indeed, earlier excavations conducted by Burton-Brown at Geoy Tepe, in the same basin, had uncovered evidence of the Trans-Caucasian culture at Level K (Burton Brown 1951). Later excavations by Burney at Haftvan Tepe brought to light further aspects of the Bronze and Iron Age cultures.
This region experienced the Middle Bronze culture known as Urmia ware with monochrome and polychrome pottery. Danti divides the Middle Bronze Age into three periods (Danti 2013: 332).
We also know about the Urmia ware in Haftavan VIB. Investigation and recognition of the Urmia ware was carried out by Edwards (Edwards 1983).

Conclusion
Akhoran can well supplement the limited dataset at hand for Hasanlu V. An important point about this site is the absence of the middle bronze material culture. Tepe Akhoran is one of the sites with deposits of the Late bronze age within the prospective reservoir of the kani sib  Dam. The main objective of this excavations is to establish the cultural sequence of the site. Other aims include dating the most important settlement attested at the site, and pinpointing the subsistence system of the late bronze age community that occupied it. The nature of the settlement and material culture of the Hasanlu VI period in Dinkhah Tepe and the limitation of the Khabur pottery to the southern areas of Lake Urmia strongly suggest that during this period, people from Mesopotamia migrated to the Ušnu- Solduz valley (Danti et al 2004.584).  In the Piranshahr area, excavations at Akhoran Hill provided evidence of a new bronze tradition in the Zab Basin.
The most important cultural material of the Akhorn  in  late  bronze age is  potteries, which is produced in a simple and painted sherds. The pottery from Tepe Akhoran is comparable to the material coming from the, Azerbaijan and the Anatoly. 
The pottery is decorated with geometric patterns. The shape of the dishes is more inclined to closed-mouth dishes. Also, what the data of Akhoran excavations show indicates the cultural relations of this region with other parts of the Urmia Lake basin, including Hasanlu, and outside the borders of Iran, the areas of Anatolia and Iraqi Kurdistan. This area may be geographically more inclined to Anatolia. 
Full-Text [PDF 2364 kb]   (938 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2020/07/20 | Accepted: 2020/12/12 | Published: 2021/04/30

References
1. -دانتی، مایکل، (1396). آذربایجان در گذر از عصرمفرغ به عصر آهن. ترجمۀ صمد علیون، ناشر پروژۀ حسنلو.
2. -سلیمی، صلاح؛ حیدری، رضا؛ و فلاحیان، یوسف، (1399). «معرفی، توصیف و طبقه‌بندی سفال‌های اشکانی فصل اول کاوش تپه‌بالان سردشت». مجلۀ مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، شمارۀ 22، صص: 106-83.
3. -شریفی،مهناز، (1398). «گزارش کاوش باستان شناسی تپه آخوران». پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی (منتشر نشده).
4. -روبینسون، کارن، (1388). «دینخواه تپه و ظروف ارومیه». مجموعه مقلات دینخواه تپه، انتشارات گنجینۀ هنر.
5. مترجم، عباس؛ و نیکنامی، کمال‌الدین، (1390). «عصرمفرغ قدیم در شرق زاگرس‌مرکزی-ایران». مجلۀ مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، شمارۀ 2، صص: 54-35.
6. ولایتی، رحیم؛ میرزایی، سعید؛ و خانعلی، حمید، (1396). «تبیین جایگاه فرهنگ‌های دورۀ مفرغ میانی و جدید در شما‌ل‌غرب ایران مطالعۀ موردی سفا‌‌‌ل‌های سبک ارومیه و سفال خابور». مجلۀ پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، دورۀ 7، شمارۀ 13، صص: 44-25.
8. - Arbuckle, B. S. & Hammer, E. L., (2018). “The Rise of Pastoralism in the Ancient Near East”. Journal of Archaeological Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-018-9124-8.
9. - Abdi, K., (2002). “Strategies of Herding pastoralism in the Middle Chalcolithic period of the west Central mountains”. Ph.D dissertation In University of Michigan. Ann Arbour.
10. - Abdi, K., (2003).“The Early Development of Pastoralism in the Central Zagros Mountains”. Journal of World Prehistory, Vol. 17, No. 4. Pp: 395-448.
11. - Abedi, A.; Khatib Shahidi, H.; Chataigner, C, H.; Niknami, K.; Eskandari, N.; Kazempour, M.; Pirmohammadi, A.; Hoseinzadeh, J. & Ebrahimi, G. H., (2014). “Excavation at Kul Tepe of (Hadishahr), North-Western Iran, 2010: First Preliminary Report”. Ancient Near Eastern Studies. No. 51, Pp: 33-65.
12. - Balatti , S., (2017). Mountain Peoples in the Ancient Near East, The Case of the Zagros in the First Millennium BCE. Harrassowitz Verlag.Wiesbaden. Germany.
13. - Burney, C. A., (1961).“Excavation at Yanik tepe north-west Iran”. IRAQ. Vol, XXIII, Pp: 134-152
14. - Burney, C. A., (1962). “Excavation at Yanik tepe Azarbaidjan 1961”. IRAQ. Vol, XXIV, Pp: 54-61
15. - Burney, C. A., (1964). “The Excavations at Yanik Tepe,Azerbaijan,1962: Second preliminary Report”. IRAQ, Vol 26. No. 1, Pp: 54-61.
16. - Burney, C. & Lang, D., (1971). The Peoples of the Hills. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
17. - Burton Brown, T., (1951). Excavation in Azerbaijan, 1949. London. Butler, Tanner LTD.
18. - Danti, M. D.; Voigt, M. M. & Dyson, R. H., (2004). “The Search for the Late Chalcolithic/Early Bronze Age Transition in the Ushnu-Solduz Valley, Iran”. In A. Sagona (ed.), A View from the Highlands: Archaeological Studies in Honour of Charles Burney. Ancient Near Eastern Studies, Suppl. 12, Pp: 583-616, Louvain: Peeters.
19. - Dyson, R. H. Jr., (1969).“A Decade in Iran”. Expedition, No. 11(2), Pp: 32-47.
20. - Dyson, R. H. Jr., (1965). “Problems of Protohistoric Iran as Seen from Hasanlu”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, No. 24(3), Pp: 193-217.
21. - Edwards , M. R., (1983). Excavation in Azerbaijan (north-western Iran). Oxford (BAR international series 182).
22. - Edward, M., (1986 ). “Urmia Ware and its Distribution in North – Western Iran in the second Milllenium B.C; a review of the results of Excavation and Surveys”. IRAN, No. XXIV, Pp: 57-70.
23. - Hamlin, C., (1974). “The Early Second Millennium Ceramic Assemblage of Dinkha Tepe”. IRAN, No. 12, Pp: 125-153.
24. Hejebri Nobari, A. & Binnandeh, A., (2012). “Excavation at Lavin Tepe in northwest Iran”. Ancient Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 49, Pp: 95-117.
25. - Isikil, M., (2015).“The Kura-Araxes Culture in The Erzurum Region: The Process of Its Development”. TÜBA-AR, No. 18, Pp: 51-69.
26. - Khalilov, T.; Mirzaei, M.; Hamrahi, H. & Alizadeh, N., (2017). “An Environmental Study of Azerbaijan in the Late Bronze-Early Iron Age Based on Archaeological Data”. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, No. J8.244, Pp: 1-8.
27. - Kiguradze, T. & Sagona, A., (2003). On the origins of the Kura–Araxes Cultural complex, Archaeology in the Borderlands. Investigations in Caucasia and Beyound, Los Angeles .
28. - Kroll, S., (2004).“Aurel Stein in Hasan Ali. Bemalte frühbronzezeitliche Keramik im Gebiet des Urmia-Sees: ‘Hasan Ali Ware”. In A. Sagona (ed.), A View from the Highlands: Archaeological Studies in Honour of Charles Burney. Louvain: Peeters.
29. - Kroll, S., (2005). “The Southern Urmia Basin in the Early Iron Age”. Iranica Antiqua, No. 40, Pp: 65-85.
30. - Kroll , S., (1994). “Habur-Ware im Osten - oder: Der TAVO auf Irrwegen im Iranischen Hochland”. Beiträge zur Altorientalischen Archäologie und Altertumskunde, Festschrift für Barthel Hrouda zum, No. 65, Geburtstag, Pp: 159-166.
31. - Kushnareva, K, KH., (1997). The southern Caucasus in prehistory stages of cultural and Socioeconomic Development from the eight to the second Millennium B.C. Translated by H., Michael .University of Pennsylvania.
32. - Less, S. H. & Bates, D., G., (1974). “The Origions of specialized Nomadic Pastoralism , A systematic Model”. American model, 39, No: 2, Pp: 187-193.
33. - Mallowan, M., (1936). “The Excavation at Tell Chagar Bazar”. IRAQ, No. III, Pp: 1-86.
34. - Özfırat, A., (2011). “Erzurum Müzesi’nden İnsan Figürlü Bir Çömlek”. Karadeniz’den Fırat’a Bilgi Üretimleri: Önder Bilgi’ye Armağan Yazıları, Eds. A. Öztan, Ş. Dönmez, Pp: 311-318, Ankara 2011: Bilgin Yayınları.
35. - Oguchi, H., (1998). “A Reassessment of the Distribution of Khabur Ware An approach from an aspect of its main phase”. Journal of western Asiatic Studies AL-RAFIDAN. Vol. XVIII, Pp: 195-224.
36. - Oguchi, H., (2001). “The origins of Khabur ware ,A Tentativenote”. Journal of western Asiatic Studies AL-RAFIDAN, Vol. XXII, Pp: 71-87.
37. - Ozfirat, A., (2001). Dogu Anadolu yayla kulturleri Arkeologi vesanat yayinlari. Istanbul.
38. - Palumbi ,G., (2017).“Push or Pull Factors? The Kura-Araxes ‘Expansion’ from a Different Perspective”. The Upper Euphrates Valley, In: E. Rova, M. Tonussi (ed.), At the Northern Frontier of Near Eastern Archaeology, No. XXXVIII Pp: 113-132.
39. - Palmisano, A., (2012). “Diachronic and Spatial Distribution of Khabur Ware in the Early Second Millennium BC”. Journal of Open Archaeology Data. No. 1, Pp: 8:1-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/4f8d6ed49bd54.
40. - Piller, C. K., (2012). “Neue Erkenntnisse zur Verbreitung der Kura-Araxes-Kultur in Nord- und Zentraliran”. In: H. Baker, K. Kaniuth, A. Otto, Stories of long ago. Festschrift für Michael Roaf, Pp: 441-457.
41. - Rova, E., (2014). “The Kura-Araxes Culture in the Shida Kartli region of Georgia: An overview”. Paléorient, No. 40(2), Pp: 47-69.
42. - Rubinson, K. S., (2004). “Dinkha Tepe, Iran, and So-Called Urmia Ware, Ancient Near Eastern Studies, In, A View:/From The Highlands Archaeological Studies Judies”. In: Honour of Charles Burney. Edited, by , Antonio Sagona.
43. - Sagona. A. (2004 ). “A viwe from the High land”. In: Archaeological studies in Honor of Charles Burney. edited by: sagona, A.
44. - Sharifi, M., (2020). “Excavations at Barveh Tepe: New Insights into the Early Bronze Age in Northwest Iran”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 79, No. 2, Pp: 287–303.
45. - Stein, S. A., (1940). Old Routes in Western Iran. London: MacMillan and Co Ltd.
46. - Van Ziest ,W., (1967). “Late quaternary vegetating History of western Iran”. review of paleobotany and palynology, No. 2, Pp: 301-311.
47. - Voigt , M. M. & Dyson, R. H. Jr., (1992). “The Chronology of Iran. 8000 – 2000 B.C”. Chronology in world Archaeology, third Edition Vols. Robert W. Ehrich (ed). University of Chicago press. Chicago, Pp: 122–178.
48. - Wright, H. T., (1983). “Climatic change in the zagros Mountains Revisited”.In: Prehistoric Archaeology along the Zagros Flanks, Edited by Braidwood, Linda, Braidwood, Robert. Charles, Reed. Patty Watson, 105, Chicago.
49. - Zingarello, M., (2018). Bronze Age Ceramics From Logardan, Report on The Fourth Season of Excavations at Girdi Qala and Logardan. Regis Vallet University of Paris.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.