logo
year 8, Issue 30 (1-2025)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2025, 8(30): 205-230 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nikgoftar A, Taghavi A, Hashemi Zarj Abad H, Moradi A. (2025). A Research on the Chinese Pottery Found in the Archaeological Excavations of the Historical City Belqays. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 8(30), 205-230. doi:10.61882/PJAS.8.30.205
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-972-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student in Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran (Corresponding Author). , abedtaghavi1397@gmail.com
3- Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
4- Alexander von Humboldt Postdoctoral, University of Humboldt (Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung), Bamberg DE, Germany.
Abstract:   (1863 Views)
Abstract
The historical city of Esfarayen is one of the most important and glorious cities of the Islamic period, which was one of the important provinces of Neishapur until the Mongol invasion, and shortly after the Mongol invasion and the destruction of Neishapur, it was revived and flourished more than before when the Ilkhanids came to power. At the beginning of Timur’s rule, this city was severely destroyed, and from the end of Timur’s period to the end of Shah Abbas Safaviy’s rule, it grew relatively slowly with political ups and downs, and it was abandoned due to the attack of Afghans and population changes. One of the most important valuable goods that was exported from China to other regions from the third to the twelfth century A.H. is Celadon pottery and the other is blue-white pottery. According to the 9 seasons of archaeological exploration in Shahr-e Belqays, 5 pieces of celadon and 2 pieces of blue-white pottery have been found, which have not been studied so far, and for this reason, research was necessary. The main questions of this research are, first of all, what period do these celadons and blue-and-white porcelain belong to? Secondly, according to the technical structure and typological comparison, are the pottery produced locally or extra-regionally, and how did it enter the city of Esfarayen? The third question is the reason for the presence of this type of pottery in the historical city of Esfarayen based on the archaeological context and historical documents. The descriptive-analytical research method and data collection method is based on field and library studies. The results showed that the celadons belong to the 2nd to the 8th century A.H. and the blue-and-white pottery are dated to the beginning of the 8th to the 11th century. The celadons and blue-whites studied are completely non-native and entered the city of Esfarayen by sea and land. Due to the quality and rarity, the type of motifs and the type of lines and writing themes are related to the noble and wealthy classes of the city.
Keywords: Shahr-e Belqays, Esfarayen, Islamic Period, Chinese Pottery, Ming Dynasty.

Introduction
Due to the strategic position of the land of Iran, which has always been on the path of important East-West communication routes from the past to the present, with a branch of the Silk Road passing through its soil as an intermediary between the civilizations of the Far East, especially China and Its western neighbors were like Iraq and Syria. Among the goods exported from China are the famous Celadon pottery and blue-and-white pottery. Due to the importance of Celadon and blue-and-white pottery, many countries were competing with each other based on their geographical region at that time to take over the market for the products of this art and industry. China was the main manufacturer of this product and Iran was the main highway for the commercial connection of this product to Europe and Africa. The city of Esfarayen is one of the important cities of the Islamic period, which was located on the commercial route of the Silk Road (Moghdisi, 1982: 566); (Ibn-e Howqal, 1986: 188; Jihani, 1988: 149); (Ibn-e Khurdazbah, 1991: 222). Due to the presence of powerful rulers and politicians such as Abu al-Abbas Esfarayeni in the Samanid and Ghaznavid periods, in the Seljuq and Ilkhanid periods such as Saeed Malik Bahauddin Juvini and in the Safavid period, Abu Muslim Khan enjoyed special growth and development and is one of the most prosperous and prosperous cities. Khorasan was considered that the commercial highways passed through this city (Aubin, 1971:121). In addition to crossing the trade route, the existence of thriving markets (Idrisi, 1409 AH, Vol. 2: 690-693)، (Hamiri, 1984: 56), and the production of important goods such as: cloth, metal containers, pottery, makes merchants and In addition to supplying goods imported from far away to this city, merchants should distribute the goods produced in this city to nearby cities and distant places, especially the Iranian plateau, Shamat, Anatolian Peninsula, North Africa, etc. One of the most important imported goods and popular among the governors and residents of this city is the dishes known as Celadon and Blue White, of which 5 pieces of such dishes have been discovered in archaeological excavations (Nikgoftar, 2014). Considering the discovery of this pottery from the archaeological context and the lack of introduction and study of it, and from the mention of writing marks on their surface, the upcoming article tries to analyze them in the context of history and archeology in addition to introducing and reading the lines.

Discussion and reasoning
 In the archaeological excavations of the city of Esfarayen, a total of 4 pieces of celadon pottery were found, one of which is of the Yue type (3rd-4th century) and the rest is of the Lank Chuan type (6th and 7th century). By examining and comparing these types of pottery, it can be said that in addition to neighboring areas and extra-regional areas, there has been direct or indirect trade with China since the 3rd century, considering the increase in the number of Lankchuan pottery related to the 6th century. And seventhly, from the reference of historical documents about the rule of the Jovini family over this city, their good relations with the Genghis family and the handing over of the government of the western part of Khorasan to this family (Jovini, 2012, vol.2, 222) and the political-economic journey of this family to Mongolia (ibid.: 222) and from the discovery of coins from this period in neighboring regions (Nikgoftar & Behnamfar, 2008) and extra-regional (ТЮНИБЕКЯАН, 2003) it can be said that in this period, Lank Chuan pottery came through the trade route of the Silk Road. That Esfarayen was located in one of these important commercial branches (Maghdisi, 1982: 566); (Ibn-e Howqal, 1986: 188; Jihani, 1988: 149); (Ibn-e Khurdazbah, 1991: 222) entered this city. Among other pottery that can be seen in China and Islamic lands in a significant way after Celadon is blue-and-white pottery, the production of these vessels became common in the states of Jijiang, Jianshui, Yusi and Jiangshan from the Yuan Dynasty, but the best type In the Jindjin states in the city of Chin Khwa (Chin-Hwa), which was related to the imperial furnaces (Bahranipour, 2022: 8). In the archaeological excavations in Shahr-e Belqays, 2 pieces of blue-and-white  pottery were identified, which according to the decorations and technical structure belong to the late Timurid and Safavid periods and the Ming period in China. It has been stated that according to the reference of historical documents and archaeological data mentioned above about the importance, value and use of these vessels and from the motifs and lines used and the examination of the technical structure of the vessels which proves that they are non-native, in general, it can be He said that these dishes were made for the order or use of the rich class and nobles in this city.

Conclusion 
By studying the piece of Chinese pottery in the city of Esfarayen, so far, two prominent pottery types of Celadan and blue-and-white  have been obtained, the first group of Celadan; that by comparative comparison of this species in terms of technical structure such as; The type of paste, glaze and construction form with examples of ceramics obtained from the sites of the Islamic period such as; Siraf, Mehruban, Kish, Neishapur, and Bandar Najiram, it can be said that this type of celadan is imported and non-native, and in terms of chronology, it is similar to the Yue and Lank Chuan types at the same time as the Samanian period until the end of the Ilkhanate period. The increase in the number of Lankchuan type of celadan along with other archaeological evidence and historical documents prove the prosperity and prosperity of this city in the Ilkhanid period and a transregional and global trade connection. Among the other types of pottery that were mentioned are blue-and-white  pottery, according to the comparative studies and examination of their technical structure, this type is also imported, according to the references in the historical documents about the destruction of this city in the attack of Timur and its lack of prosperity. It can be said that the presence of this type of pottery in this city dates back to the late Timurid period and the early Safavid period, during which time this city prospered again. According to the taxonomic examination and comparison of the pottery, which is completely similar to the pottery discovered in Hormuz, Taiwan, and the samples obtained from North Africa, it can be said that probably these pottery were indirectly and transregionally and globally from China to the port of Hormuz. And through the south-north highway and through the Jerjan-Tos commercial road, which was restored and reconstructed by Amir Ali Shir Navai in this period, he entered the city of Safrayan. Due to the rarity, quality of construction, themes and motifs, and on the one hand, historical documents indicate that these dishes were used in royal banquets or royal tombs, and from the discovery of these pieces from the citadel and noble houses, it can be said that these dishes are unique to The privileged and prosperous classes belonged to the historical city of Esfarayen. In general, the Chinese writings in the blue-and-white earthenware of Esfarayen city are as follows: the text of container number 9, the writing on the bottom of the container is incomplete and illegible, and the text on the bottom of the container contains the Chinese word called (peace, comfort), (longevity), (happiness) and (health). The text of container number 13 is written with the comparison and typology of the Chinese word du-ming-nlen-zuo, meaning the construction of the Ming period.
Full-Text [PDF 1413 kb]   (274 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2023/12/20 | Accepted: 2024/02/8 | Published: 2025/03/20

References
1. - ابن‌بطوطه، (1361). سفرنامۀ ابن‌بطوطه. ترجمۀ محمدعلی موحد، چاپ سوم، انتشارات علمی فرهنگی.
2. - ابن‌خرداذبه، ابوالقاسم عبدالله بن عبدالله، (1370). المسالک و الممالک. ترجمۀ حسین قراچانلو، تهران.
3. - ابن‌حوقل، یاقوت، (1345). صورهالارض. ترجمۀ دکتر جعفر شعار، تهران: انتشارات بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
4. - افضلی، زینب؛ خان‌مرادی، مژگان؛ و کریمیان، حسن، (1400). «گونه‌شناسی و گاهنگاری سالدن‌های به‌دست آمده از بررسی باستانشناختی دشت سیرجان: بندر تاریخی نجیرم». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، (11) 28: 196-173. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2020.21820.2152
5. - اصطخری، ابوالحسن ابراهیم، (1340). مسالک و ممالک. به‌کوشش: ایرج افشار، تهران، بنگاه ترجمه و نشرکتاب.
6. - امامی، امین؛ خنجری، رضا؛ و نقوی، سوگند، (1398). «ساختار شناسی و مینرالسفال سلادن به‌دست آمده از بندر تاریخی حریره در جزیره کیش». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 11 (1): 17-1. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2019.71075
7. - بی‌نا، (1384). فرهنگ جغرافیایی آبادی‌های کشور، استان خراسان شمالی: شهرستان اسفراین. تهران: انتشارات سازمان جغرافیایی و وزارت دفاع و پشتیبانی نیروهای مسلح.
8. - بحرانی‌پور، علی؛ یوکائیچی، یاسوهیرو؛ و تاتسویا موری، تاتسویا، (1393). پیمایش، بررسی و تحقیق میدانی تنگه هرمز. اداره میراث فرهنگی هرمزگان.
9. - بحرانی‌پور، علی (1401). «کاسۀ فغفوری در بارگاه ایلخان وشاه». تاریخنامۀ ایران بعد از اسلام، 13 (32): 33-1. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiiph.2022.41627.2111
10. - توفیقیان، حسن، (1400). «پژوهشی در تاریخ تجارت دریایی ایران و چین نمونۀ مطالعاتی: بندر تاریخی نجیرم». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 11(31): 215-191. https://doi.org/10.22084/nb.2021.21925.2156
11. - دانشپورپرور، فخری، (1376). یادنامه گردهمایی باستان‌شناسی شوش. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی.
12. - زارعی، محمدابراهیم؛ عامریان، حمید؛ و نیک‌گفتار، احمد، (1395). «طبقه‌بندی گونۀ سفالینه‌های لعاب‌دار قرن 2 تا 4 ه‍.ق. کشف ‌شده از شهر تاریخی بلقیس (اسفراین کهن)». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 8 (1: شماره پیاپی 13): 57-76. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2016.59495
13. - جیهانی، ابوالقاسم، (1369). ترجمه علی عبدالسلام کاتب، با تعلیقات: فیروز منصوری، آستان قدس رضوی.
14. - حافظ ابرو، عبدالله بن لطف الله، (1380). زبدهالتواریخ. تصحیح و تعلیق: سیدکمال حاج سید جوادی، تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد.
15. - حمیری، محمدبن عبدالمنعم، (1984 م.)، الروض المعطار. تحقیق: دکتر احسان عباس، الطبعۀ الثانیه، بیروت: مکتبۀ البنان.
16. - جوینی، عطا ملک بن محمد، (1385). تاریخ جهانگشای. تصحیح و تنظیم: محمد بن عبد الوهابقزوینی، دنیای کتاب‌.
17. - سهرابی،غلامرضا، (1310ه‍.ش.). «تاریخ و افسانه شهر اسپرایین - معروف به شهر بلقیس». روزنامۀ نوبهار، 33: 523.
18. - سیوری، راجر، (1363). ایران عصر صفوی. ترجمۀ کامبیز عزیزی، تهران: مرکز.
19. - شاطری میترا، (1394). «حوزه‌بندی گونۀ نقش کنده در گلابه در ایران (مطالعۀ موردی:حوزه شرق و جنوب‌شرق)». دومین همایش ملی باستان‌شناسی ایران، دورۀ دوم، دانشگاه بیرجند.
20. - شکری، یدالله، (1350). عالم آرای صفویه. تهران: بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
21. - عباس‌آبادی‌عربی، محبوبه؛ صدقی، یاسین؛ بهشتی، سید ایرج؛ و عابدی، اکبر، (1397). «بررسی پتروگرافی سفال‌های اسلامی شهر بلقیس اسفراین، خراسان شمالی». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی ایران، 10 (1 شمارۀ پیاپی 17): 155-167. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2018.215741.142330
22. - فرجامی، محمد؛ و نیک‌گفتار، احمد، (1390). «گزارش فصل چهارم شهر تاریخی بلقیس اسفراین». آرشیو پایگاه شهر بلقیس، اسفراین (منتشر نشده).
23. - کاشانی، ابوالقاسم عبدالله، (1386). عرایس الجواهر و نفایس الاطایب. به‌کوشش: ایرج افشار، تهران: انتشارات المعی.
24. - کاوتس، رالف؛ و پتاک، رودریش، (1383). هرمز در منابع دورۀ یوان و مینگ. ترجمۀ مهرداد وحدتی، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
25. - کامبخش‌فرد، سیف‌الله، (1386). سفال و سفالگری در ایران (از ابتدای نوسنگی تا دوران معاصر. تهران: نشر ققنوس.
26. - کمال‌هاشمی، رضا، (1392). «مطالعه سفال‌های دوران اسلامی مکشوفه از شهربلقیس». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه سیستان‌وبلوجستان (منتشر نشده).
27. - کریمی، فاطمه؛ و کیانی، محمد یوسف، (1364). «هنر سفالگری دوره اسلامی ایران». چاپ اول، تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و آموزش‌عالی، مرکز باستان‌شناسی ایران.
28. - مقدسی، (1361). احسن التقاسیم فی معرفهالاقالیم. ترجمۀ علینقی وزیری، چاپ اول، تهران: نشر کاویان.
29. - مشیرپور، محمد، (1346). «گزارش گمانه‌زنی خرابه‌های شهر بلقیس(اسفراین)». وزارت فرهنگ و هنر، اداره کل فرهنگ و هنر خراسان (منتشر نشده).
30. - منشی، اسکندربیگ، (1377). عالم آرای عباسی. ج 1 و 2، تصحیح: دکتر محمداسماعیل رضوانی، چاپ اول، تهران: دنیای کتاب.
31. - نوروزی، جمشید؛ و خزائلی، نرگس، (1401). «سنجه گونه‌های روابط ایران و چین در دورۀ صفویه». تاریخ ایران، 15 (2): 63-43. https://doi.org/10.52547/irhj.15.2.43
32. - نیک‌گفتار، احمد، (1391). «گزارش فصل پنجم شهر تاریخی بلقیس اسفراین». آرشیو پایگاه شهر بلقیس، اسفراین (منتشر نشده).
33. - نیک‌گفتار، احمد، (1394). «گزارش فصل ششم شهر تاریخی بلقیس اسفراین». آرشیو پایگاه شهر بلقیس، اسفراین، (منتشر نشده).
34. - نیک‌گفتار، احمد، (1400). «سفال لعاب پاشیده در شهر بلقیس». خراسان ‌نامک: مقالات باستان‌شناسی، تاریخ و معماری خراسان در نکوداشت مقام علمی استاد رجبعلی لباف‌خانیکی، پدیدآوران: مسعود طاهرزاده، میثم لباف‌خانیکی، محمدمهدی امینی‌قمی، مینا گلستانی تهران، چاپ اول، ناشر: خانۀ اندیشمندان علوم انسانی: 432-418.
35. - نیک‌گفتار، احمد؛ و بهنام‌فر، محمد حسن، (1387). معرفی و شناسایی سکه‌های ضرب اسفراین. مشهد: انتشارات راهیان سبز.
36. - وحدتی، علی‌اکبر، (1386). «گزارش گمانه‌زنی برای تعیین حریم شهر بلقیس، اسفراین». تهران: بایگانی مرکز اسناد سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
37. - وحدتی، علی‌اکبر، (1389). پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناختی در شهر بلقیس. چاپ اول، بجنورد: انتشارات اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی خراسان شمالی.
39. - Abbas Abadi Arabi, M., Sedki, Y., Beheshti, S. & Abedi, A., (2017). “Petrographic investigation of Islamic pottery from city Belqays Isfarayen, North Khorasan”. Journal of Iranian Archeology Studies, 10 (1: 17): 155-167. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2018.215741.142330 [In Persian]
40. - Afzali, Z., Khanmoradi, M. & Karimian, H., (2021). “Typology and Chronology of Celadons Obtained During Archeological Survey in Sirjan Plain: the historical port of Najiram”. Iranian Scientific and Archaeological Research Quarterly, 11 (28): 173-196. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2020.21820.2152 [In Persian]
41. - Aubin, J., (1971). “Réseau pastoral et réseau caravanier. Les grand’routes du Khurassan à l’époque mongole”. Le monde iranien et l’Islam, 1: 105-130.
42. - Bahranipour, A., Yukaichi, Y. & Mori, T. (2013). “Azer and Aban”. Survey, investigation and field research of Strait of Hormuz. [In Persian]
43. - Bahranipour, A. H., (2022). “Faghfuri bowl in the court of Ilkhan and Shah”. Scientific Quarterly of History of Iran after Islam, 13 (32): 1-33. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiiph.2022.41627.2111 [In Persian]
44. - Chen, K., (2000). Chinese porcelain: art, elegance and appreciation. San Francisco, Long River Press.
45. - Daneshpour Paror, F., (1997). “Finds of porcelain vessels in Hormuz Island and the role of this island in Iran-China trade”. Memoir of Susa Archeology Meeting, Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization: 158-127. [In Persian]
46. - Deng, Y., (2011). Ancient Chinese invention. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
47. - Dewar, R., (2002). Stoneware. Pennsylvania, University Pennsylvania Press.
48. - Emami, M., Khanjar, R. & Naghavi, S., (2019). “Material Characteristics and Mineralogy of Celadons from the Ancient Port of Harireh, Kish Island; Trace of Maritime Trade from China to Persian Gulf”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 11 (1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2019.71075 [In Persian]
49. - Faizi, M. & Mahjour, F., (2015). “The First Yue Celadon in Iran and its Distribution Pattern in the Early Islamic Period”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 6 (2): 131-148. [In Persian]
50. - Farjami, M. & Nikgoftar, A., (2011). “Report of the fourth Season of the historical city Belqays Isfarayen”. Archive of the city of Belqays, Isfarayen (Unpublished). [In Persian]
51. - Hafiz-i, A., (2001). Zobadeh al-Tawarikh. Corrected by: Seyyed Kamal Haj Seyyed Javadi, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Guidance. [In Persian]
52. - Ḥimyarī, M., (1984). “al-Rawd al-Mi’tar Fi Khabar al-Aqtar”. Dr. Editor by: Ehsan Abbas Published by Bayrūt: Maktabat Lubnān, 1975.
53. - Ibn-e Batutta, R., (1983). The Travels. Translate by: Mohammad Ali Mohad, third edition, Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian]
54. - Ibn-e Howqal., (1966). Surat al-Arz. Translated by: Jafar shoar, Tehran: Published by: Bunyad-i Farhang-i Iran. [In Persian]
55. - Ibn-e Khurdazbah, A., (1991). Masalek va al-mamalek. Translate by: Hossein Karachanlou, Tehran. [In Persian]
56. - Iṣṭakhrī, I.-ibn M., (1961). Masalek va al-mamalek. edited by: Iraj Afshar and published, Tehran: Translation and publishing company. [In Persian]
57. - Jeihani, A., (1990). Ashkal al-Alam. Translated by: Ali Abdulsalam Katab, with comments by: Feroz Mansouri, Published by: Astan Quds Razavi. [In Persian]
58. - Joyni, A., (2006). History of Jahangisha Jovini. edited by: Shahrokh Mousavian based on correction, Allameh Mohammad Qazvini, Tehran: Dastan. [In Persian]
59. - Kamal Hashemi, R., (2012). “Study of Islamic potteries from Shahr-e Belqays”. MA, dissertation, University of Sistan & Balochistn (Unpublished). [In Persian]
60. - Kambakhsfard, S., (2007). The pottery in Iran from the beggening of eolithic to contemporary. Tehran: Ghoghnoos. [In Persian]
61. - Karimi, F. & Kiani, M. Y., (1985). The Iranian art of pottery in Islamic era. Tehran: first edition, Tehran: Center of Archaeology of Iran. [In Persian]
62. - Kashani, A., (2007). Arais al-Jawahar and Nafais al-Ataib. By: Iraj Afshar, Tehran: Al-Ma’i Publications.
63. - Kavets, R. & Petak, R., (2013). Hormuz in Yuan and Ming period sources. Translated by: Mehrdad Vahdati, Tehran: University Publishing Center.
64. - Lee, E., (1956). “The Celadon tradition”. The Bulletin of the Cleveland Museum of Art, 43 (3): 46-52.
65. - Maqdisi, (1982). Ahsan al-Taqasim fi Marafah al-Aqalim. Translated by: Alineghi Vaziri, first edition, Tehran: Kavian Publishing House. [In Persian]
66. - Medley, M., (1974). “Yuan Porcelain and Stoneware”. Faber and Faber: 63-102.
67. - Moshirpour, M., (1967). “Speculation report of the ruins of Belqays (Isfarayen)”. Ministry of Culture and Arts, General Department of Culture and Arts of Khorasan (Unpublished). [In Persian]
68. - Nikgoftar, A. & Behnamfar, M., (2008). Identification and Introduction of Coins Minted in Esfarayen. Mashhad: Rahian Sabz Publications. [In Persian]
69. - Nikgoftar, A., (2011). “Report of the fifth Season of the historic city of Belqays Isfarayen”. Archive of the city of Belqays, Isfarayen (Unpublished), [In Persian]
70. - Nikgoftar, A., (2014). “Report of the sixth Season of the historical city of Belqays Isfarayen”. Archive of the city of Belqis, Isfarayen. (Unpublished), [In Persian]
71. - Nikgoftar, A., (2021). “Glazed pottery in Shahr-e Belqays”. Khorasan Namek: Archeological articles, history and architecture of Khorasan in the criticism of the scientific position of Professor Rajab Ali Labafkhaniki, Authors: Masoud Taherzadeh, Maisham Labafkhaniki, Mohammad Mahdi Aminiqomi, Mina Golestani, Tehran, first edition, publisher: House of Humanities Thinkers: 418-432. [In Persian]
72. - Nowrozi, J. & Khazaeli, N., (2022). “Measuring the types of relations between Iran and China in the Safavid period”. Iranian History, 15 (2): 43-63. https://doi.org/10.52547/irhj.15.2.43 [In Persian]
73. - Pope, J. A., (1956). Chinese Porcelain from the Ardbil Shrine. Freer Gallery of Art. Washington. https://doi.org/10.5479/sil.182488.39088015143605
74. - Priestman, S. M. N., (2005). “Settlement & Ceramics in Southern Iran: An Analysis of the Sasanian &Islamic Periods in the Williamson Collection”. M. A. Thesis: Durham University (Unpublished).
75. - Priestman, S. M. N., (2013). “A Quantitative Archaeological Analysis of Ceramic Exchange in the Persian Gulf and Western Indian Ocean, AD c.400 – 1275”. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton (Unpublished).
76. - Secretary, S., (1998). Alam Arai Abbasi. vol. 1 and 2, edited by: Dr. Mohammad Ismail Rizvani, first edition, Tehran: World Book.
77. - Shatari, M., (2014). “Zoning of the type of carvings in Gulabeh in Iran (Case study: East and South-East region)”. Second National Archeology Conference of Iran, Second Session, Birjand University. [In Persian]
78. - Shokri, Y., (1971). Safaviyeh Scholars. Tehran: Iranian Culture Foundation.
79. - Siori, R., (1984). Safavid Iran. Translated by: Kambizaazizi, Tehran: Center.
80. - Sohrabi, G., (1931). “The article “History and legend of the city of Sprain - known as the city of Belqis”. Nobahar newspaper, 33: 523. [In Persian]
81. - Tampeo, M., (1989). Maritime Trade between China and West: An Archeological Study of the Ceramics from Siraf (Persian Gulf): to 12th Century A.D. David Brown Book Company.
82. - Tofighian, H., (2021). “The Research in the Iran-China Maritime Trade Case Study: The Najirom Historical Port”. Iran’s Scientific Quarterly and Archaeological Research, 11 (31): 191-215. https://doi.org/10.22084/nb.2021.21925.2156 [In Persian]
83. - Tregear, M., (1987). Chinese ceramics in the Ashmolean Museum: an illustrated handbook to the collections. Oxford, Ashmolean Museum.
84. - Untitled, (2005). Geographical culture of the settlements of the country, North Khorasan province: Isfarayen city. Tehran: Publications of the Geographical Organization and the Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Support. [In Persian]
85. - Vahdati, A., (2007). Speculative report for determining the boundaries of Belqis city,Isfarayen. Tehran: Archives of the National Cultural Heritage Organization Document Center. [In Persian]
86. - Vahdati, A., (2010). Archaeological Investigations in Shahr-e Belqays. First edition, Bojnord: Publications of the General Department of Cultural Heritage of North Khorasan. [In Persian]
87. - Valenstein, S. G., (1989). A Handbook of Chinese Ceramics. Rev. and enl. Ed. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art: Distributed by: H. N. Abrams.
88. - Watson, O., (2004). “Chinese-Iranian relations: mutual influence of Chinese and Persian ceramics”. Encyclopaedia Iranica, V (5): 455-457.
89. - Whitehouse, D., (1968). “Excavations at Siraf: first interim report, Iran”. Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies, 6: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/4299597
90. - Whitehouse, D., (1971). “Excavation at Siraf: frouth interim report, Iran”. Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies, 9: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/4300434
91. - Whitehouse, D., (1976). “Kish, Iran”. Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies, 14: 146-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/4300551
92. - Whitfield, R. & Chan, T., (2009). National Museum of Korea. Seoul: National Museum of Korea.
93. - Wilkinson, Ch. K., (1973). Nishabur: pottery of the early Islamic period. New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art.
94. - Williamson, A., (1987). “Regional Distribution of Medieval Persian Pottery in the light of Recent Investigations”. In: J. Allan and C. Roberts (eds.), Syria and Iran: Three Studies in Medieval Ceramics, Oxford University Press: 10-22.
95. - Won-Bok, L., (2009). Royal ceramics of Goryeo Dynasty. Seoul: National Museum of Korea.
96. - Yun, Y., (2005). The Gompertz and other collection in the Fitzwilliam Museum. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
97. - Zarei, M., Amrian, H. & Nikgoftar, A., (2015). “Classification of the type of glazed pottery from the 2 th to 4th century AH. A. discovered from the historical city of Belqis (Old Isfarayn)”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 8 (1: 13): 57-76. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2016.59495 [In Persian]
98. - Zhang, R., (2018). “Chinese Ceramic Trade Withdrawal from the Indian Ocean: Archaeological Evidence from South Iran”. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology, 6: 73-92.
99. - Zhao, B,, (2015). “Chinese-style ceramics in East Africa from the 9th to 16th century: A case of changing value and symbols in the multi-partner global trade”. Afriques, https://doi.org/10.4000/afriques.1836
100. - ТЮНИБЕКЯН, В., (2003). ДРЕВНИЕ И СРЕДНЕВЕКОВЫЕ МОНЕТЫ ТУРКМЕНИСТАНА: Обзор истории денежного обращения в Центральной Азии на примере монетных кладов, найденных на территории Туркменистана, Киев.
101. - https://pongrasscollections.com
102. - https://www.ceramicsartorscience.co.uk

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.