logo
year 8, Issue 29 (12-2024)                   Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2024, 8(29): 213-234 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rezasoltani Z, Shateri M. (2024). Dating of Tiles with Human Figures of the Safavid Period with the Help of Concurrent Paintings. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 8(29), 213-234. doi:10.22034/PJAS.8.29.213
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-968-en.html
1- M.A. in Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanity Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanity Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran (Corresponding Author) , mshateri@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1196 Views)
Abstract
With the election of Isfahan in 1597 A.D. As the capital of the Safavid dynasty, many buildings were built in the city, most of their interior and exterior surfaces were decorated with tiles. The miniaturists of this era came to the help of tile artists and created beautiful and eye-catching works by drawing various motifs. In the Safavid period, and with the flourishing of the Isfahan school, the restriction of human figures, disappeared. According to this study, with the aim of relative dating of tiles by comparing their human motifs with the dated miniatures motifs of this period, has tried to answer these questions:  What effects did the painting of the Safavid period have on the human motifs of the tiles of this period, and these effects How can it be used in the dating of tile paintings? The method of gathering the findings of this research; Findings were made through library and field studies and by identifying more than 80 tile frames with human figures from non-religious buildings and works in different museums, and the research method is descriptive, analytical, and comparative. The results of the research indicate that the human motifs on the tiles from the Isfahan school of the Safavid period have been deeply influenced, and according to the themes of the motifs, the characteristics of the drawing of clothes (Turbans, hats, shawls wrapped around the waist, long and flowery dresses), facial expressions, eyebrows, even The type of designed dishes and their matching with the motifs of figures, it is possible to consider the time period between the end of the first half to the beginning and the end of the second half of the 11th century AH for the frame of the tiles.
Keywords: Safavid Period, Dating, Human Figure, Tile, Painting.

Introduction
Tiling is one of the practical methods in architectural decoration. Since the invention of tile, this art and craft has been used in a wide way to enhance and cover the surfaces of interior and exterior of Iranian buildings. With the emergence of the Safavid dynasty, art and craft found a new life and the Safavid rulers, who were art lovers, made their court as the center of artistic and industrial gathering. Although the art of tiling is not considered an innovative art of the Safavid period, but in this time, it was not limited to the mere adaptation and imitation of the art of the predecessors, and the expansion and manifestation of this art was given special attention. The motifs drawn on the tiles of this period were more diverse than in the past, and included all types of plant motifs, geometrical, inscriptional, human, animal and even mythological motifs, while in the Timurid period, mostly plant motifs, geometrical, and inscriptional were drawn and the use of human and animal motifs was not acceptable. Such a trend had an influence on painting and, as a result, the motifs drawn on the tiles of the early Safavid period, as the tiles of the first Safavid period mostly had geometrical, Islimi and inscription motifs, but gradually with the flourishing of the Isfahan school of painting and the tendency abundant with human images, the use of single faces in terracotta works and tiles also spread.
Since the drawing of motifs on the tiles and pottery of each period was done by contemporary painters and in line with the common painting school, based on this, the following article has tried to study the human motifs of the tiles left over from the Safavid period (on buildings or separated from them).
Research questions: The current research has been carried out in the direction of the relative dating of the tiles with human motifs that have remained from the Safavid period, so the main questions of this research are What effects did the painting of the Safavid period have on the human motifs of the tiles of this period, and these effects How can it be used in the dating of tile paintings?
Research method: In this research, the information is collected through collecting library documents and texts, and field investigations in works, buildings (such as baths and churches) and museums and indoor collections (such as national museum) and  museums of outside Iran (such as the Louvre or Metropolitan) have been collected. In this regard, 80 tile frames with human motifs, all were made in underglaze technology, were identified, 13 frames are still in the buildings, in their own place, and all of them are in the city of Isfahan and the rest, are separated from their main places and scattered in museums and collections inside and outside of Iran. It should be mentioned that for comparison, 50 paintings of Isfahan style, which have human motifs and have the most similarity in terms of subject and theme, style and execution method with the human motifs of the tiles, were selected. Based on the research goal and questions; the research method are descriptive, analytical and comparative.

Research background
Based on the investigations carried out, it can be said that the researches that have been carried out on the motifs of the Safavid period tiles have mostly focused on plant motifs, geometrical, and inscription motifs, and have only pointed to human motifs. Their relative dating also has not been researched. The most important references made in this area among the sources of the first category belong to travelers such as “Pietro Della Valle” (2005), who in his travelogue briefly discussed the general patterns of the tiles of this period. Among the second-hand sources, researchers such as “Sourani”(2017) have investigated the effects of painting on human and animal motifs of Safavid period fabrics. “Bakui” (2014) has also paid attention to the investigation and comparative study of the human motifs of the metals of this period. “Reisi” (1990) briefly mentioned only the introduction of a few human motifs in some of the buildings left from this period. “Mansouri Jazabadi” (2013) investigated different motifs of Safavid to Qajar bathroom tiles in the city of Isfahan and among the introduction of different motifs, she also discussed some human motifs. Despite these studies, no independent and focused research has been done on the human motifs of the tiles and their relative dating with other works, which is what the present study aims to achieve.

Discussion 
The spread of Isfahan’s painting style had an impact on all arts such as tile work, metal work, pottery, or cloth weaving. This was more evident in the art of tiling, because the selection of Isfahan as the capital led to an increase in the process of urban development and the construction of various private and public works and buildings, and the need to cover their internal and external surfaces with tiles quickly. This was made possible with the help of seven-color (Haft Rang) tile technology. Among the motifs drawn on the tiles, human motifs found a revival after centuries, but these motifs were mostly used in the decoration of palaces, baths and churches. Since it was not customary to mention the date of making the tiles with human motifs, nowadays it is enough to attribute them to the Safavid period. Whereas, by classifying the themes and matching and comparing the elements in the tiles’ patterns with figures, a relatively more accurate history can be obtained.

Conclusion 
By checking and studying the themes of the collected tiles and also examining the way of drawing motifs, we can be witnessing the influence of the Isfahan school by carefully observing the details of the patterns on the tiles. What is often seen in the paintings of the Isfahan school are motifs of flower-watching and recreation scenes by men and women in gardens, motifs of everyday life scenes, single faces, hunting or escape, which can also be seen in the surviving examples of tiles from this period. Investigations indicated that there are many similar features in the patterns of the tiles with Isfahan style paintings. The most important commonalities can be classified into four general sections. Drawing facial and body expressions; Clothing and its types; Objects in the scenes such as containers or patterned backs; and natural elements such as trees, flowers and bushes. So following the painting style of the Isfahan school with careful attention to the details of the motifs, the enlargement of motifs in the middle of the frame and the dominance of motifs over the frame and the placing of single faces in the center can be clearly seen in the collected examples.
In general, according to the matching of the mentioned cases on the frames with the paintings, it seems that the tiles with human motifs with hunting themes and themes of young people studying in the time frame of the first half of the 11th century A.H.(16th A.D) and human motifs with the themes of flower procession and fun and single faces are placed in the second half of the 11th century A.H.(17th AD) according to the European clothes, aprons and hats.
Full-Text [PDF 2350 kb]   (218 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Interdisciplinary
Received: 2023/12/17 | Accepted: 2024/02/22 | Published: 2024/12/21

References
1. _ اولئاریوس، آدام، (1385). سفرنامه آدام اولئاریوس. تهران: ابتکارنو.
2. _ اقاجانی‌اصفهانی، حسین؛ و جوانی، اصغر، (1386). دیوار‌نگاری عصر صفویه در اصفهان. تهران: شادرنگ.
3. _ باکوئی، فائزه، (1394). مطالعۀ تطبیقی نقوش انسانی در فلز‌کاری و نگار‌گری عصر صفویه. دانشگاه شاهد.
4. _ پوپ، آرتور؛ و اکرمن، فیلیس، (1387). سیری در هنر ایران از دوران پیش از تالریخ تا امروز. جلد 10، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
5. _ پاکباز، روئین، (1385). نقاشی ایرانی از آغاز تا امروز. تهران: زرین و سیمین.
6. _ پرایس، کریستین، (1347). تاریخ هنر ایران. ترجمۀ مسعود رجب‌نیا، تهران: امیر کبیر.
7. _ جلالی، رکسانا، (1396). «بررسی آثار فیگوراتیو کاشی هفت‌رنگ دورۀ صفویه». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس (منتشر نشده).
8. _ حسینی، مهدی؛ و علی‌پور، مرضیه، (1393).«تأثیر نگار‌گری دورۀ صفویه بر سفالیه‌های همان دوره». پژوهش هنر، (7): 99-87. https://ph.aui.ac.ir/page/116/
9. _ خواجه‌احمدعطاری، علیرضا؛ آیت‌اللهی، حبیب‌الله؛ شیرازی، علی‌اصغر؛ مرائی، محسن؛ و قاضی‌زاده، خشایار، (1391). «بررسی انسان‌نگاری در نقاشی مکتب اصفهان سدۀ دهم و یازدهم هجری‌قمری». مطالعات تطبیقی هنر، 2: 81-92. https://mth.aui.ac.ir/page/115
10. _ دلاواله، پیترو، (1384). سفرنامۀ پیترو دلاواله. ترجمۀ شعاع‌الدین، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
11. _ رئیسی، مژگان، (1369). «بررسی نقوش انسان و حیوان در کاشی‌کاری‌های به‌جای مانده از بنا‌های تاریخی شهر اصفهان (دورۀ صفوی و قاجار)». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشگاه هنراصفهان (منتشر نشده).
12. _ رحیمی‌پردنجانی، حنیف، (1399). جایگاه انسان در نقاشی عصر صفوی. یادبود پرفسور سایس نظرلی، دانشگاه علوم انسانی مسکو.
13. _ رهنورد، زهرا، (1393). نگارگری تاریخ هنر ایران در دورۀ اسلامی. تهران: سمت.
14. _ سورانی، غلامرضا، (1397). «بررسی و مطالعه تأثیران هنر نگارگری دورۀ صفوی بر نقوش انسانی و جانوری پارچه های این دوره». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهرکرد (منتشر نشده).
15. - شاطری، میترا؛ و رضاسلطانی، زهرا، (1402). «گونه شناسی مضامین نقوش انسانی کاشی‌های دورۀ صفویه». نگارینۀ هنر اسلامی، (25): 138-155. https://doi.org/10.22077/nia.2023.5446.1623
16. _ علیزاده، سیامک، (1384). «نقش هنر کاشی‌کاری در تجلی معماری دورۀ صفویه». نگره، 1: 15 تا 24.
17. _ کونل، ارنست، (1372). هنر اسلامی. ترجمۀ هوشنگ طاهری، تهران: مشعل آزادی.
18. _ منصوری‌جز‌آبادی، جمیله، (1393). «بررسی و مطالعه تکنیک ساهت و تزئین کاشی‌کاری در حمام‌های تاریخی شهر اصفهان از آغاز عصر صفوی تا اواخر دورۀ قاجار». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان (منتشر نشده).
19. _ منصوری‌جز‌آبادی، جمیله؛ و سید‌هاشم، حسینی، (1395). «سیر تحول نقوش انسانی در کاشی‌کاری حمام‌های تاریخی شهر اصفهان از دورۀ صفوی تا پایان دورۀ قاجار». پژوهش هنر، 12: 117-103. DOR: 20.1001.1.23453834.1395.6.12.7.2
20. _ ماهر‌النقش، رویا، (1397). «بررسی تطبیقی نقوش جانوری در تزئینات کاشی‌کاری دورۀ صفویه با دورۀ قاجار در بنا‌های تاریخی اصفهان». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان (منتشر نشده).
21. _ ماهر‌النقش، محمود، (1361). طرح و اجرای نقش در کاشیکاری ایران. جلد 1، تهران: موزه رضا عباسی.
22. _ معمار‌زاده، محمد، (1388). «نقاشی عصر صفوی مکتب تبریز و اصفهان». جلوه هنر، 29: 39-46.
23. _ مکی‌نژاد، مهدی، (1388). تاریخ هنر ایران در دورۀ اسلامی. تهران: سمت.
24. _ یزدان‌پناه، مجتبی، (1381). «بررسی تزئینات در معماری با نگاهی به کاشی‌های هفت‌رنگ شکلی در کرمان». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشکدۀ هنر دانشگاه شاهد، (منتشر نشده).
26. - Aghajani Isfahani, H. & Jawani, A., (2007). Safavid Mural Painting in Isfahan. Tehran: Shadrang. (In Persian)
27. - Alizadeh, S., (2005). “The Role of Tiling Art in the Manifestation of Safavid Period Architecture”. Negareh, 1: 15-24. (In Persian)
28. - Bakouyi, F., (2015). “Comparative Study of Human Motifs in Safavid Metalwork and Miniature”. Thesis in MA. Shahed University (Unpublished). (In Persian)
29. - Connell, E., (1993). Islamic art. Translated by: Hoshang Taheri, Tehran: Meshaal Azadi.
30. - Della Valle, P., (2005). The Travels in Persia. Tehran: Elmi and Farhangui. (In Persian)
31. - Houseyni, M. & Alipour, M., (2014). “The influence of Safavid Period Painting on the Pottery of the Same Period”. Pazhuhesh-e Honar, 7: 87-99. https://ph.aui.ac.ir/page/116/ (In Persian)
32. - Jalali, R., (2017). “Investigating the figurative works of seven-color tiles of the Safavid period”. Thesis in MA. In: Tarbiat Modares University. (Unpublished) (In Persian).
33. - Khaje Ahmad Atari, A., et al., (2012). “Investigation of Anthropology in the Painting of Isfahan School in the 10th and 11th AH”. Motaleat e Tatbighi Honar, 2: 81-92. https://mth.aui.ac.ir/page/115 (In Persian).
34. - Maher al-Naqsh, M., (1982). Design and implementation of role in Iranian tiling. Vol. 1, Tehran: Reza Abbasi Museum. (In Persian)
35. - Maher al-Naqsh, R., (2017). “Comparative study of animal motifs in the tiling decorations of the Safavid period and the Qajar period in the historical monuments of Isfahan”. Master’s thesis, Isfahan Art University (Unpublished). (In Persian)
36. - Makinejad, M., (2009). History of Iranian art in the Islamic period. Tehran: Side.
37. - Mansouri Jezabadi, J., (2013). “Investigating and studying the technique of carving and decorating tiles in the historical baths of Isfahan city from the beginning of the Safavid era to the end of the Qajar period”. Master’s thesis. Isfahan Art University (Unpublished). (In Persian)
38. - Mansouri Jezabadi, J. & Hosseini, S. H., (2015). “The evolution of human motifs in the tiling of historical baths in Isfahan from the Safavid period to the end of the Qajar period”. Art Research, 12: 103-117. (In Persian) DOR: 20.1001.1.23453834.1395.6.12.7.2
39. - Memarzadeh, M., (2009). “Painting of the Safavid era of the school of Tabriz and Isfahan”. The effect of Art, 29: 39-46. (In Persian)
40. - Olearius, A., (2006). The Voyages & Travels of the Ambassadors. Tehran: Ebtekar Nou.
41. - Pakbaz, R., (2006). Persian Painting from the beginning to now. Tehran: Zarin and Simin. (In Persian).
42. - Pope, A. U., (2008). Survey of Persian Art. Vol. 10, Tehran: Elmi and Farhanigui. (In Persian).
43. - Price, Ch., (1968). History of Islamic Art. Tehran: Amir Kabir. (In Persian)
44. - Rahimi Pordanjani, H., (2020). The Place of Human in Safavid Era painting, Memorial of Professor Sais Nazarli. Human University of Moscow. (In Persian).
45. - Rahnaward, Z., (2014). The history of Iranian Painting Art in the Islamic Period. Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)
46. - Reyisi, M., (1990). “Investigating Human and Animal Motifs in the Tiling Left by the Historical Buildings of Isfahan City (Safavid and Qajar periods)”. Thesis in MA. In Isfahan Art University. (Unpublished). (In Persian)
47. - Shateri, M. & Reza Soltani, Z., (2023). “Thematic Typology of Human Motifs of Safavid Tiles”. Negarineh Honar Islami, (25): 138-155. https://doi.org/10.22077/nia.2023.5446.1623 (In Persian)
48. - Sourani, G., (2018). “Investigating and Studying the Effects of Safavid Period Painting on the Human and Animal Motifs of the Fabrics of This Period”. Thesis in MA. In Shahrekord University. (Unpublished). (In Persian)
49. - Yazdan Panah, M., (2002). “Examining Decorations in Architecture with a Look at Seven-Color Tiles in Kerman”. Thesis in MA. In Shahed University. (Unpublished). (In Persian)
50. - URL1: www.vam.ac.uk. Accesed in 26/6/2021
51. - URL2: www.britishmuseum.org. Accesed in 20/2/2021
52. - URL3: www.metmuseum.org. Accesed in 12/3/2021
53. - URL4: www.sothebys.com. Accesed in 25/6/2021
54. - URL5: www.flickr.com. Accesed in 13/10/2021
55. - URL6: www.christies.com. Accesed in 13/10/2021
56. - URL7: www.dic.academic.ru. Accesed in 28/8/2021
57. - URL8: www.louvre.fr. Accesed in 9/3/2021
58. - URL9: www.zellij.net. Accesed in 24/6/2021
59. - URL10: www.asianart.org. Accesed in 20/8/2021
60. - URL11: www.bonhams.com. Accesed in 5/3/2021
61. - URL12: www.ssachsen.museum-digital.de. Accesed in 6/6/2021
62. - URL13: www.rom.on.ca. Accesed in 22/6/2021

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.