year 9, Issue 32 (8-2025)
Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2025, 9(32): 219-240 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hashimi S A A, Karimain H, Sedaghati B. (2025). Recovery of the Spatial Structure of the City of Ghazni, Afghanistan Based on Archaeological Studies. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 9(32), 219-240. doi:10.61882/PJAS.967
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-967-en.html
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-967-en.html
Recovery of the Spatial Structure of the City of Ghazni, Afghanistan Based on Archaeological Studies
1- PhD Student in Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
2- Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
Abstract: (1075 Views)
Abstract
The ancient city of Ghazni was one of the important cities of the Islamic period and served as the capital of the Ghaznavid dynasty. It is located six kilometers north of the modern city of Ghazni. The strategic significance of this city in the historical and civilizational developments of the Islamic era attracted the attention of archaeologists after World War II, leading to periodic excavations at its ancient sites. Most studies conducted on Ghazni during the Ghaznavid period have been based on historical sources, while archaeological investigations have primarily focused on the elite sections of the city and findings from the palaces of the Ghaznavid dynasty. In this context, the recent excavations by the Afghan team in the area between the two minarets—which form the basis of the present article—are particularly significant because they examine the commoner neighborhoods of the city. The main aim of this study is to illuminate aspects of everyday urban life in this part of the city during the Ghaznavid era, as the authors believe that understanding this area is crucial for a comprehensive knowledge of the city in that period. Despite the relative preservation of Ghazni’s historical fabric and architectural monuments, no comprehensive study has yet determined the city’s spatial structure. Therefore, a thorough research project was undertaken to answer the question of how Ghazni’s spatial development evolved and to reconstruct the form of the city’s spaces during its peak. To achieve this, investigations were carried out within the historical context of the city, and the results of field studies were compared with written sources. The study revealed that the underlying layers of the neighborhood around the Masʿud III Minaret date back to pre-Islamic periods.
Keywords: Ghazni City, Capital of Ghaznavids, Masoud III Palace, Bahram Shah Minaret, Lashkari Bazar.
Introduction
Today, the city of Ghazni is located approximately 135 kilometers southwest of Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, along the Kabul–Kandahar highway. The ancient city of Ghazni, or Ghaznin, situated six kilometers north of the modern city of Ghazni (Fig. 1), lies at an elevation of 2,183 meters above sea level in an intermontane plain, with its water resources primarily supplied by the Gul Koh Mountain range to the north of the plain (Farahmand, 2020). According to the results of the joint Indo-Afghan archaeological mission in 1967, evidence indicates that humans inhabited this region as far back as the Paleolithic period (Alshin & Hammond, 2021: 88). The Avesta, the oldest sacred text of Zoroastrianism, is the earliest source to mention the Ghazni region, referring to it as “Kakhra.” In Ptolemy’s Geography of the 2nd century CE, Ghazni is referred to as “Gazos” (Yamin, 2001: 170). Archaeological evidence uncovered from excavations at the Tepe Sardar sanctuary suggests that the city dates back at least to the 2nd century CE, during the Kushan Empire (Tedi, 1983). Nevertheless, until the Ghaznavid period, Ghazni remained a small town governed by local rulers (Faizi, 2002).
In the 3rd century AH, the Saffarids, the first Muslim Iranian dynasty, launched campaigns into this region, and the local rulers (the Lawik dynasty) became their tributaries, turning Ghazni into a military base for their operations (Mojahed, 2003: 102–107). After the Saffarids’ defeat, the Lawik family became vassals of the Samanids until 351 AH, when Alp-Tegin, a Turkic slave of the Samanids who had risen to the rank of military commander, succeeded in defeating the last ruler of the Lawik dynasty (Habibi, 2011: 40–41). Following this, the city became the capital of the Ghaznavid state. Ghazni reached its peak prosperity during the Ghaznavid period but gradually declined due to internal conflicts and the Ghurid invasions in the 6th century AH. The city was ultimately destroyed by the Mongol invasions and never regained its former prominence (Mousavi-Haji et al., 2019).
Most studies conducted on the city of Ghazni during the Ghaznavid period have relied primarily on historical sources, while archaeological research has largely focused on the elite sections of the city and the findings from the palaces of the Ghaznavid dynasty. In this context, the recent excavations by the Afghan team in the area between the two minarets—which form the basis of the present article—are particularly significant because they examine the commoner neighborhoods of the city. The primary aim of this study is to shed light on aspects of everyday urban life in this part of Ghazni during the Ghaznavid period, as the authors believe that understanding this section is crucial for a comprehensive knowledge of the city in that era.
Research Questions: The present study seeks to answer fundamental questions regarding the urban fabric, especially the densely built central area of the city during the Ghaznavid period. Specifically, it addresses two major questions about the urban space and its development during this period: First, can the transition from the pre-Islamic to the Islamic era be identified in Ghazni based on archaeological evidence and in a stratified sequence? Second, when was the central part of Ghazni formed, and what types of urban transformations did this section undergo during the Ghaznavid period?
Research Methodology: The research presented in this article is fundamental in nature, aimed at addressing the above questions. It was conducted based on field studies, archaeological excavation reports, and documentary (library-based) research.
Spatial Structure of the City of Ghazni in the Ghaznavid Era
Archaeological evidence indicates that the main pre-Islamic part of the city was limited to the citadel (Fig. 2) and the sanctuary known as Tepe Sardar and its surrounding area (Sherato, 1959). Alp-Tegin, a Turkic emir in the Samanid army, was defeated in an internal succession struggle in Bukhara but managed in 351 AH to defeat the army sent by the new Samanid ruler near Balkh. He then captured the city of Ghazni, which was under the rule of Abubakr Lawik, a local vassal of the Samanids (Kargar, 2004: 5–6). Upon Alp-Tegin’s death in 352 AH, his son and successor, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim, could not withstand the army of Abubakr Lawik’s son and successor, Abu Ali Lawik, and fled to Bukhara. Only a year later, with the support of the forces of Amir Mansur Samanid, he reclaimed Ghazni, and he passed away shortly afterward in 355 AH (Heidari, 2011: 55–57). From this date onward, Ghazni became part of the Islamic territories.
After a decade of rule by Bilgatgin (355–365 AH), Ghazni witnessed further conflicts among Sebuktigin, Yirigtigin, and Abu Ali Lawik and his ally Hindushah of Kabul. As a result, Sebuktigin (365–387 AH) rose to power, marking the beginning of the city’s first major constructions in the Islamic period. It is reported that he built a palace called Sahlabad, which remained unfinished and whose location is now unknown. The only surviving monument from this period is the tomb of Sebuktigin, located in the Afghan Chāl neighborhood of Ghazni (Jalali, 1972: 1–7).
Conclusion
Field studies in the city of Ghazni have revealed that the core of the city was centered around the “Shiyar Qara-Bagh neighborhood” in the southern part of the city, near the Hind and Gardiz gates. Since the archaeological site known as “Tepe Sardar” dates back to the Kushan period, it can be confidently argued that the origins of Ghazni extend to the Kushan Empire (30–350 CE). Archaeological evidence indicates that during the Ghaznavid period, the city expanded toward the west and north, extending toward the Sefid Koh highlands.
Archaeological findings also show that significant transformations occurred in the neighborhood today known as “Afghan Chāl,” which likely existed even before the Ghaznavid period. This area became a royal and administrative district, as evidenced by key structures such as the Masʿud III Palace, the tomb of Sebuktigin, and the Bahram Shah and Masʿud III Minarets. Based on archaeological evidence, in the 5th century AH this part of the city, particularly the central area between the two minarets, experienced significant prosperity and likely hosted the jeweler’s market. With the establishment of the market in this neighborhood, residents of the city appear to have settled in surrounding districts such as Shuleh, contributing to the city’s westward expansion.
However, with the decline of Ghaznavid power, the city suffered extensive damage during the conflicts between the Ghaznavids and the Ghurids and was ultimately destroyed by the Mongol invasions. Nevertheless, the city was not entirely lost and, over the centuries, managed to sustain its existence.
The ancient city of Ghazni was one of the important cities of the Islamic period and served as the capital of the Ghaznavid dynasty. It is located six kilometers north of the modern city of Ghazni. The strategic significance of this city in the historical and civilizational developments of the Islamic era attracted the attention of archaeologists after World War II, leading to periodic excavations at its ancient sites. Most studies conducted on Ghazni during the Ghaznavid period have been based on historical sources, while archaeological investigations have primarily focused on the elite sections of the city and findings from the palaces of the Ghaznavid dynasty. In this context, the recent excavations by the Afghan team in the area between the two minarets—which form the basis of the present article—are particularly significant because they examine the commoner neighborhoods of the city. The main aim of this study is to illuminate aspects of everyday urban life in this part of the city during the Ghaznavid era, as the authors believe that understanding this area is crucial for a comprehensive knowledge of the city in that period. Despite the relative preservation of Ghazni’s historical fabric and architectural monuments, no comprehensive study has yet determined the city’s spatial structure. Therefore, a thorough research project was undertaken to answer the question of how Ghazni’s spatial development evolved and to reconstruct the form of the city’s spaces during its peak. To achieve this, investigations were carried out within the historical context of the city, and the results of field studies were compared with written sources. The study revealed that the underlying layers of the neighborhood around the Masʿud III Minaret date back to pre-Islamic periods.
Keywords: Ghazni City, Capital of Ghaznavids, Masoud III Palace, Bahram Shah Minaret, Lashkari Bazar.
Introduction
Today, the city of Ghazni is located approximately 135 kilometers southwest of Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, along the Kabul–Kandahar highway. The ancient city of Ghazni, or Ghaznin, situated six kilometers north of the modern city of Ghazni (Fig. 1), lies at an elevation of 2,183 meters above sea level in an intermontane plain, with its water resources primarily supplied by the Gul Koh Mountain range to the north of the plain (Farahmand, 2020). According to the results of the joint Indo-Afghan archaeological mission in 1967, evidence indicates that humans inhabited this region as far back as the Paleolithic period (Alshin & Hammond, 2021: 88). The Avesta, the oldest sacred text of Zoroastrianism, is the earliest source to mention the Ghazni region, referring to it as “Kakhra.” In Ptolemy’s Geography of the 2nd century CE, Ghazni is referred to as “Gazos” (Yamin, 2001: 170). Archaeological evidence uncovered from excavations at the Tepe Sardar sanctuary suggests that the city dates back at least to the 2nd century CE, during the Kushan Empire (Tedi, 1983). Nevertheless, until the Ghaznavid period, Ghazni remained a small town governed by local rulers (Faizi, 2002).
In the 3rd century AH, the Saffarids, the first Muslim Iranian dynasty, launched campaigns into this region, and the local rulers (the Lawik dynasty) became their tributaries, turning Ghazni into a military base for their operations (Mojahed, 2003: 102–107). After the Saffarids’ defeat, the Lawik family became vassals of the Samanids until 351 AH, when Alp-Tegin, a Turkic slave of the Samanids who had risen to the rank of military commander, succeeded in defeating the last ruler of the Lawik dynasty (Habibi, 2011: 40–41). Following this, the city became the capital of the Ghaznavid state. Ghazni reached its peak prosperity during the Ghaznavid period but gradually declined due to internal conflicts and the Ghurid invasions in the 6th century AH. The city was ultimately destroyed by the Mongol invasions and never regained its former prominence (Mousavi-Haji et al., 2019).
Most studies conducted on the city of Ghazni during the Ghaznavid period have relied primarily on historical sources, while archaeological research has largely focused on the elite sections of the city and the findings from the palaces of the Ghaznavid dynasty. In this context, the recent excavations by the Afghan team in the area between the two minarets—which form the basis of the present article—are particularly significant because they examine the commoner neighborhoods of the city. The primary aim of this study is to shed light on aspects of everyday urban life in this part of Ghazni during the Ghaznavid period, as the authors believe that understanding this section is crucial for a comprehensive knowledge of the city in that era.
Research Questions: The present study seeks to answer fundamental questions regarding the urban fabric, especially the densely built central area of the city during the Ghaznavid period. Specifically, it addresses two major questions about the urban space and its development during this period: First, can the transition from the pre-Islamic to the Islamic era be identified in Ghazni based on archaeological evidence and in a stratified sequence? Second, when was the central part of Ghazni formed, and what types of urban transformations did this section undergo during the Ghaznavid period?
Research Methodology: The research presented in this article is fundamental in nature, aimed at addressing the above questions. It was conducted based on field studies, archaeological excavation reports, and documentary (library-based) research.
Spatial Structure of the City of Ghazni in the Ghaznavid Era
Archaeological evidence indicates that the main pre-Islamic part of the city was limited to the citadel (Fig. 2) and the sanctuary known as Tepe Sardar and its surrounding area (Sherato, 1959). Alp-Tegin, a Turkic emir in the Samanid army, was defeated in an internal succession struggle in Bukhara but managed in 351 AH to defeat the army sent by the new Samanid ruler near Balkh. He then captured the city of Ghazni, which was under the rule of Abubakr Lawik, a local vassal of the Samanids (Kargar, 2004: 5–6). Upon Alp-Tegin’s death in 352 AH, his son and successor, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim, could not withstand the army of Abubakr Lawik’s son and successor, Abu Ali Lawik, and fled to Bukhara. Only a year later, with the support of the forces of Amir Mansur Samanid, he reclaimed Ghazni, and he passed away shortly afterward in 355 AH (Heidari, 2011: 55–57). From this date onward, Ghazni became part of the Islamic territories.
After a decade of rule by Bilgatgin (355–365 AH), Ghazni witnessed further conflicts among Sebuktigin, Yirigtigin, and Abu Ali Lawik and his ally Hindushah of Kabul. As a result, Sebuktigin (365–387 AH) rose to power, marking the beginning of the city’s first major constructions in the Islamic period. It is reported that he built a palace called Sahlabad, which remained unfinished and whose location is now unknown. The only surviving monument from this period is the tomb of Sebuktigin, located in the Afghan Chāl neighborhood of Ghazni (Jalali, 1972: 1–7).
Conclusion
Field studies in the city of Ghazni have revealed that the core of the city was centered around the “Shiyar Qara-Bagh neighborhood” in the southern part of the city, near the Hind and Gardiz gates. Since the archaeological site known as “Tepe Sardar” dates back to the Kushan period, it can be confidently argued that the origins of Ghazni extend to the Kushan Empire (30–350 CE). Archaeological evidence indicates that during the Ghaznavid period, the city expanded toward the west and north, extending toward the Sefid Koh highlands.
Archaeological findings also show that significant transformations occurred in the neighborhood today known as “Afghan Chāl,” which likely existed even before the Ghaznavid period. This area became a royal and administrative district, as evidenced by key structures such as the Masʿud III Palace, the tomb of Sebuktigin, and the Bahram Shah and Masʿud III Minarets. Based on archaeological evidence, in the 5th century AH this part of the city, particularly the central area between the two minarets, experienced significant prosperity and likely hosted the jeweler’s market. With the establishment of the market in this neighborhood, residents of the city appear to have settled in surrounding districts such as Shuleh, contributing to the city’s westward expansion.
However, with the decline of Ghaznavid power, the city suffered extensive damage during the conflicts between the Ghaznavids and the Ghurids and was ultimately destroyed by the Mongol invasions. Nevertheless, the city was not entirely lost and, over the centuries, managed to sustain its existence.
Keywords: Ghazni City, Capital of Ghaznavids, Masoud III Palace, Bahram Shah Minaret, Lashkari Bazar.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special Archeology
Received: 2023/12/14 | Accepted: 2024/04/6 | Published: 2025/08/23
Received: 2023/12/14 | Accepted: 2024/04/6 | Published: 2025/08/23
References
1. - الشین، ف.ر؛ و هاموند، و. ن.، (1400). باستانشناسی افغانستان. ترجمۀ صدیق رهپو طرزی، کابل: انتشارات مقصودی.
2. - پاینده، محدثه؛ غفرانی، علی؛ و عبدالرحیم، قنوات، (1393). «اهمیت تاریخی و ساختار اقتصادی شهر غزنه در پرتو حیات سیاسی عصر غزنویان». تاریخ فرهنگ و تمدن اسلامی، 5 (16): 156-131.
3. - امینیقمی، محمدمهدی؛ محمدیعراقی، محمدمهدی؛ مقدسیان، الناز؛ و امینی، محمدمتین، (1400). «بازخوانی، تحلیل وبررسی کتیبههای سنگ مزار امیر سبکتگین در غزنه افغانستان». در: عبدنامه: یادنامۀ عبدالله قوچانی، بهکوشش: علیرضا انیسی، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه میراثفرهنگی.
4. - بمپاچی، آلیسیو، (1338). «خلاصه گزارش مختصر هیئت باستانشناسی ایتالیایی در افغانستان: مقدمهای بر باستانشناسی در غزنی». ترجمۀ علی رضوی غزنوی، آریانا، 202: 54-33.
5. - بنونیست، امیل، (1323). «نام شهر غزنه». ترجمۀ علی احمد نعیمی، آریانا، 2 (24): 13-11.
6. - بیهقی، ابولفضل محمد بن حسین، (1376). تاریخ بیهقی. بهکوشش: علیاکبر فیاض و قاسم غنی، تهران: نشر هیرمند.
7. - تدی، موریزیو، (1362). «گزارش تپه سردار». ترجمۀ عبدالواسع فیروزی، باستانشناسی افغانستان، 5 (1): 53-6.
8. - تقوینژاد، بهاره؛ و صالحیکاخکی، احمد، (1396). «پژوهشی بر تزئینات معماری دورۀ غزنوی». پژوهشهای تاریخی، 9 (4): 118-91. https://doi.org/10.22108/jhr.2017.22088
9. - جیلانی جلالی، غلام، (1343). «آثار و متروکات آل ناصر غزنه». آریانا، 22 (5): 45-40.
10. - جیلانیجلالی، غلام، (1351). غزنه و غزنویان. کابل: انتشارات انجمن تاریخ.
11. - حبیب، حبیب الرحمن، (1361). «مهندسی غزنویان در افغانستان». فصلنامۀ هنر، 2(3): 111-104.
12. - حبیبی، عبدالحی، (1347). «بیهقی و افغان شال». یغما، 21 (5): 236-231.
13. - حیدری، قدرتالله، (1390). فرهنگ و تمدن اسلامی غزنین در عهد غزنویان. کابل: انتشارات بیهقی.
14. - خیرزاده، خیرمحمد، (1392). «کاوشهای باستانشناسی در یک دهه اخیر در غزنی». مجموعه مقالات سمینار علمی تحقیقی دستاوردهای باستانشناسی یک دهۀ اخیر در افغانستان، بهکوشش: محمد انور فائز و خولیو بندیزو سرمینتو، کابل: انتشارات آکادمی علوم افغانستان.
15. - خیرزاده، خیرمحمد، (1392). «گزارش دورۀ اول کاوشهای علمی جدید اطراف منارهای غزنی». باستانشناسی افغانستان، 3 (12): 125-115.
16. - خیرزاده، خیرمحمد؛ و خواجهعمری، محمدشریف، (1394). «گزارش تحقیقی از اطراف مینارهای غزنی». باستانشناسی افغانستان، 3 (14): 171-152.
17. - رجبی، غلامنقشبند، (1397). سرگذشت و کارکردها و دست آوردهای غلام نقشبند رجبی. باستانشناس هنر اسلامی، هرات: نشر احراری.
18. - رضایی، مصطفی؛ و محمدی، مریم، (1400). «مطالعه و تحلیل شهرسازی در دورۀ غزنویان براساس منابع تاریخی و مطالعات باستانشناسی». مطالعات فرهنگی- اجتماعی خراسان، 15 (3): 82-45.
19. - شراتو، امبرتو، (1338). «قسمت اول گزارش مختصر هیئت باستانشناسی ایتالوی(ایتالیایی) در افغانستان 1958-1957: کنجکاویهای نخستین در غزنی». ترجمۀ علی رضوی غزنوی، آریانا، 203: 56-46.
20. - عظیمی، محمدعظیم، (۱۳۹۱). جغرافیایی توریستی افغانستان. کابل: انتشارات خراسان.
21. - عظیمی، محمدعظیم، (1392). جغرافیای ولایت غزنی (طبیعی، انسانی، اقتصادی). تهران: انتشارات بینالمللی الهدی.
22. - فائز، محمدانور، (1398). «غزنه و میراثهای تاریخی و باستانی آن». باستانشناسی افغانستان، 3 (37): 67-38.
23. - فرهمند، محمدانور؛ و امامی، محمدامین، (1399). «گزارش نهایی پروژه حفریات باستانشناسی ولایت غزنی». کابل: وزارت اطلاعات و فرهنگ افغانستان (منتشر نشده).
24. - فیضی، کتابخان، (1381). «گزارش سروی ساحات غزنی». کابل: اکادمی علوم افغانستان (منتشر نشده).
25. - فیضی، کتابخان، (1392). «ساحات باستانی و کاوشهای باستانشناسی در غزنی». گاهنامۀ غزنی، 4: 51-32.
26. - فیضی، کتابخان، (1393). «سروی و تحقیقات جدید در ولایت غزنی». باستانشناسی افغانستان، 12 (13): 26-16.
27. - کارگر، عبدالله، (1383). شهر سلاطین غزنه در پویه تاریخ. پیشاور، مؤسسه انتشاراتی الازهر.
28. - مجاهد، سیدامین، (1382). افغانستان در عصر صفاریان. پیشاور: ختیخ بیار غونی اداره.
29. - مقدسی، ابوعبدالله محمد بن احمد، (1361). احسن التقاسیم فی معرفه الاقالیم، ترجمۀ علینقی منزوی، جلد 2، تهران: شرکت مؤلفان و مترجمان ایران.
30. - مقصودلو، آروین؛ موسویحاجی، سیدرسول؛ و شهبازی، اشکان، (1395). «بررسی نقوش تزئینی کاخهای لشکری بازار و مسعود سوم غزنوی در افغانستان». مطالعات شبهقاره، 8 (28): 128-107. https://doi.org/10.22111/jsr.2016.2889
31. - موسویحاجی، سید رسول؛ عبدالهی، سحر؛ و جودکیعزیزی، اسدالله، (1398). «پژوهی در ساختار معماری کاخ مسعود سوم در غزنه». مطالعات شبهقاره، 11 (37): 212-191. https://doi.org/10.22111/jsr.2019.4871
32. - یمین، محمدحسین، (1380). افغانستان تاریخی: فلسفه نامگذاری شهرها، شهرکها و کوهها و دریاهای افغانستان. کابل انتشارات سعید.
34. - Allegeranzi, V., (2021). “The Medieval Urbanism of Ghazni (Afghanistan, 10–12th Centuries). A Cross-Reading of Textual and Material Evidence”. Afghanistan, 4 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3366/afg.2021.0061
35. - Alshin, F. R. & Hammond, W. N. (2021). Archaeology of Afghanistan. Translated by: Sadiq Rahpo Tarzi. Kabul: Maqsudi Publications. (In Persian).
36. - Amini-Qomi, M. M., Mohammadi-Iraqi, M. M., Maghadsian, E. & Amini, M. M. (2021). “Re-examination, analysis, and study of the tombstone inscriptions of Amir Sebuktigin in Ghazni, Afghanistan”. In: Abdnameh: Memorial of Abdullah Qouchani (Edited by Alireza Anisi). Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural Heritage. (in Persian).
37. - Azimi, M. A., (2012). Touristic Geography of Afghanistan. Kabul: Khorasan Publications. (in Afghanistan).
38. - Azimi, M. A. (2013). Geography of Ghazni Province (Physical, Human, Economic). Tehran: Elhoda International Publications. (in Persian).
39. - Benveniste, E. (1944). “The name of the city Ghazni”. Translated by: Ali Ahmad Naeimi. Ariana, 2(24): 11–13. (in Persian).
40. - Beyhaqi, A. M. b. H., (1997). Tarikh-i Beyhaqi. Edited by Ali-Akbar Fayyaz & Qasem Ghani. Tehran: Hirmand Publishing. (in Persian).
41. - Bombaci, A., (1959). “Introduction to the Excavations at Ghazni. Summary Report on the Italian Archaeological Mission in Afghanistan”. East and West, 10 (1-2): 3-22.
42. - Bompacchi, A. (1959). “Summary report of the Italian archaeological mission in Afghanistan: An introduction to archaeology in Ghazni”. Translated by: Ali Razavi Ghaznavi. Ariana, 202: 33–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29754076. (in Persian).
43. - Faiz, M. A. (2019). “Ghazni and its historical and archaeological heritage”. Archaeology of Afghanistan, 3(37): 38–67. (in Afghanistan).
44. - Faizi, K. (2002). “Survey report of Ghazni areas”. Kabul: Academy of Sciences of Afghanistan (Unpublished). (in Afghanistan).
45. - Faizi, K. (2013). “Ancient sites and archaeological excavations in Ghazni”. Gahnameh Ghazni, 4, 32–51. (in Afghanistan).
46. - Faizi, K. (2014). “New surveys and research in Ghazni province”. Archaeology of Afghanistan, 12(13): 16–26. (in Afghanistan).
47. - Farahmand, M. A. & Emami, M. A. (2020). “Final report of the archaeological excavation project in Ghazni province”. Kabul: Ministry of Information and Culture of Afghanistan (Unpublished). (in Afghanistan).
48. - Gilani-Jalali, G. (1964). “Monuments and Ruins of the Al-Nasir of Ghazni”. Ariana, 22(5): 40–45. (in Persian).
49. - Gilani-Jalali, G., (1972). Ghazni and the Ghaznavids. Kabul: History Association Publications.
50. - Giunta, R., (2005). “Islamic Ghazni an IsIAO Archaeological Project in Afghanistan: A Preliminary Report (July 2004-June 2005)”. East and West, 55 (1/4): 473-484.
51. - Giunta, R., (2009). “Islamic Ghazni: Excavations, Surveys and New Research Objectives”. In: Anna Filigenzi and Roberta Giunta (Eds), the IsIAO Italian Archaeological Mission in Afghanistan 1057-2007. Fifty Years of Research in the Heart of Eurasia (Proceedings of the symposium held in the Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente, Rome, January 8th 2008), Roma: 89-104.
52. - Habib, H. R. (1982). “Ghaznavid engineering in Afghanistan”. Art Quarterly, 2(3), 104–111. (in Persian).
53. - Habibi, A. H. (1968). “Beyhaqi and Afghan Shal”. Yaghma, 21(5), 231–236. (in Persian).
54. - Heidari, Q., (2011). Culture and Islamic Civilization of Ghazni in the Ghaznavid Era. Kabul: Bihaqi Publications. (in Afghanistan).
55. - Kargar, A., (2004). The City of the Ghaznavid Sultans in Historical Perspective. Peshawar: Al-Azhar Publishing Institute. (in Afghanistan).
56. - Kheirzadeh, K. M., (2013). “Archaeological excavations in the past decade in Ghazni”. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Seminar on Archaeological Achievements of the Past Decade in Afghanistan (Edited by M. A. Faiz & Julio Bendizo Sarmiento). Kabul: Academy of Sciences of Afghanistan. (in Afghanistan).
57. - Kheirzadeh, K. M., (2013). “Report on the first phase of new scientific excavations around the Ghazni minarets”. Archaeology of Afghanistan, 3(12): 115–125. (in Afghanistan).
58. - Kheirzadeh, K. M. & Khwaja-Omari, M. S. (2015). “Research report on the surroundings of the Ghazni minarets”. Archaeology of Afghanistan, 3(14): 152–171. (in Afghanistan).
59. - Maqdisi, A. A. M. B. A., (1982). Ahsan al-Taqasim fi Maʿrifat al-Aqalim. Translated by: Ali Naqi Monzavi, Vol. 2. Tehran: Company of Iranian Authors and Translators. (in Persian).
60. - Maqsudlu, A., Mousavi-Haji, S. R. & Shahbazi, A. (2016). “A study of decorative motifs in the Lashkari Bazaar and Masʿud III palaces in Afghanistan”. Subcontinent Studies, 8(28), 107–128. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22111/jsr.2016.2889
61. - Mojahed, S. A., (2003). Afghanistan in the Era of the Saffarids. Peshawar: Khatikh Biyar Ghoni Administration. (in Afghanistan).
62. - Mousavi-Haji, S. R., Abdollahi, S. & Joudaki-Azizi, A. (2019). “Research on the architectural structure of Masʿud III Palace in Ghazni”. Subcontinent Studies, 11(37), 191–212. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22111/jsr.2019.4871
63. - Payandeh, M., Ghaffrani, A. & Abdul Rahim, Q., (2014). “Historical significance and economic structure of the city of Ghazni in light of the political life of the Ghaznavid era”. History of Islamic Culture and Civilization, 5(16), 131–156. (in Persian).
64. - Rajabi, G. N., (2018). Life, Activities, and Achievements of Ghulam Naqshband Rajabi (Islamic Art Archaeologist). Herat: Ahrari Publications. (in Afghanistan).
65. - Rezaei, M. & Mohammadi, M. (2021). “Study and analysis of urban planning in the Ghaznavid period based on historical sources and archaeological studies”. Khorasan Cultural–Social Studies, 15(3): 45–82. (in Persian).
66. - Rugiadi, M., (2009) “Documenting marbles of the Islamic period from the area of Ghazni. The Italian contribution (1957-2007)”. In: Anna Filigenzi and Roberta Giunta (Eds), The IsIAO Italian Archaeological Mission in Afghanistan 1957-2007. Fifty years of research in the Heart of Eurasia (Proceedings of the symposium held in the Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente, Rome, January 8th 2008), Rome: 105-115.
67. - Scerrato, U., (1959). “Summary report on the Italian Archaeological Mission in Afghanistan. The first two excavation Campaigns at Ghazni, 1957-1959”. East and West, 10 (1/2): 23-55.
68. - Sherato, U. (1959). “Part One of the brief report of the Italian archaeological mission in Afghanistan 1957–1958: Initial investigations in Ghazni”. Translated by: Ali Razavi Ghaznavi. Ariana, 203, 46–56. (in Persian).
69. - Taghavi-Nejad, B. & Salehi-Kakhki, A. (2017). “A study on the architectural decorations of the Ghaznavid period”. Historical Research, 9(4), 91–118. (in Persian).https://doi.org/10.22108/jhr.2017.22088
70. - Tedi, M. (1983). “Report on Tepe Sardar”. Translated by: Abdul Wase Firozi. Archaeology of Afghanistan, 5(1), 53–56. (in Afghanistan).
71. - Yamin, M. H. (2001). Historical Afghanistan (Philosophy of Naming Cities, Towns, Mountains, and Rivers of Afghanistan). Kabul: Saeed Publications. (in Afghanistan).
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |