logo
year 7, Issue 24 (8-2023)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2023, 7(24): 63-78 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nable R. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Ancient Persian Copper Alloy Weapons from a Private Collection in the USA. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 7(24), 63-78. doi:10.30699/PJAS.7.24.63
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-895-en.html
M.A. in Administration, expert for ancient bronze weaponry. Ellijay, Georgia, USA. , info@pricelesspast.com
Abstract:   (2588 Views)
This paper will compare the characteristics of four ancient Iranian, copper alloy weapons. These weapons are from private collections in the USA at the time of examination. The first two weapons fall into the category of dirks (or daggers). This characterization is based on the overall length of the weapons in question. For comparative purposes, a dagger reaches 30 cm, a dirk is a classification for weapons with overall lengths of 30-50 cm, while a sword would have an overall length of over 50 cm. Because precise archaeological data is absent for these pieces, we examined short-term provenance and microscopic analysis, together with stylistic components to verify the authenticity and general cultural origin of each specimen. The hilt of each weapon is bordered by a ridge, or flange, on both sides that would have allowed for an organic or stone inlay to make the grip more comfortable and functional, as well as adding to the aesthetics of the piece.  The pommels of these weapons all have a similar, crescent shape. Weapon 2, has not only a crescent-shaped pommel but also a more pronounced, crescent-shaped guard. Both of the dirks (weapons 1 and 2) have roughly triangular blades. However, the blade of weapon 1 becomes narrower near the guard while the blade of weapon 2 does the opposite and flares out near the guard. Microscopic examination of the patinas confirms the ancient origin of each piece, however, subtle differences in the patinas suggest that the alloys and/or the burial conditions of each were potentially different. This would be an area where further study would be warranted. 
Full-Text [PDF 1318 kb]   (671 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2023/01/3 | Accepted: 2023/05/5 | Published: 2023/08/21

References
1. - Mahboubian, H., (1997). Art of Ancient Iran: Copper and Bronze. London: Philip Wilson Publishers.
2. - Moorey, P. R. S., (1971). Catalogue of the Ancient Persian Bronzes in the Ashmolean Museum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. - Moshtagh Khorasani, M., (2006). Arms and Armor from Iran: The Bronze Age to the End of the Qajar Period. Tübingen: Legat-Verlag.
4. - Muscarella, O. W., (1988). Bronze and Iron—Ancient Near Eastern artifacts in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York. The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
5. - Negahban, E. O., (1995). Weapons from Marlik. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
6. - Stutzinger, D., (2002). Mit Hieb und Stich: Bronzewaffen aus dem alten Iran. Die Sammlung von Grawert. Frankfurt: Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte – Archäologisches Museum.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.