Mendeley  

Zotero  

Sadeghimehri S, Masoudiamin Z. (2023). A New Perspective on Tehran School Painting: Khayyam and His Influence on the Formation of Works. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 7(23), 357-375. doi:10.30699/PJAS.7.23.357
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-671-en.html

Abstract
This research, by examining some paintings of the Tehran school in the contemporary period on the one hand, and reading the thoughts and philosophical views of the poet and mathematician Khayam Neishabouri of the 5th and 6th centuries A.H. on the other hand, aims to understand why and how To examine and research the placement of this poet’s poems and quatrains for the first time by painters of the Tehran school in the contemporary period. The hypothesis of the research in this article is that the artists of the Tehran school adhered to the traditional values and painting of Iran’s past during the modernism era in order to preserve their Iranian and Aryan roots as much as possible by linking to the past. The researched works include 9 paintings by contemporary painters, which belong to the Cultural Institute of Mustazafan Foundation Museums. Based on this, the method of collecting documentary and field information was done and the analysis of the data was also done based on the research, and finally, the conclusion was reached that the artists of the Tehran school, by reviving the traditional style and Iranian painting, returned to the past artistic methods. They stressed against the art of modernism, and by addressing Khayyam’s works and poems, for the first time, they sought to return to their Aryan roots and their past before the era of modernity and modernism. 
Keywords: Painting, Tehran School, Khayyam’s Poems, Contemporary Period, Modernism.

Introduction
During the Pahlavi era, which coincided with the rise of modernism and the spread of modernist ideas in Iran, we witness the impact of art and especially contemporary painting on modernism. This period coincides with the emergence of artists who, relying on their individuality, were able to interfere in the tradition, and in such cases, diversity and changes can be identified, especially in the thought, design or topics that were previously known and established. Another effective factor in artistic trends is the identification and application of visual rules of old art, which were not used during a period due to limitations caused by style, and were recognized and used again by the new generation of artists. On the other hand, the influence of art patrons is of particular importance, it can be said that at the beginning of the 20th century, we witnessed the emergence of two groups of art patrons who played a vital role in the development of Iranian art and the dissemination of information about this art. played the first role of the great private collectors, some of whom specialized in painting, and the second category includes the great art dealers, the best of whom were collectors at the same time, and a balance between transactions business and love of art established that in the upcoming research, these two groups played an important role in the tendency of painters to deal with works based on ancient literature and Khayyam’s poems. In the intellectual and political atmosphere of the years leading up to the constitutional revolution, the presence of such supporters and patrons on the one hand, and the rise and intensity of modern ideas on the other hand, and the formation of two poles of modernity and tradition in the thinking of the thinkers of this land, led to the marginalization of the conservative and inferior layers of society or thought became a tradition. Therefore, it can be acknowledged that along with the political and cultural developments of Iran in the field of modernism, art gradually experienced a similar process. With all these interpretations, in that period, in addition to the formation of modern art in Iran, we witness the creation of works that artists, in the traditional way and based on the paintings of the past, but with their own unique look and style, created works with subjects they depict the new both from a literary and a social point of view.

Discussion
On the one hand, the interest of patrons and patrons of works with these oriental themes was noticed in this era, this attention caused a return to the literature of the past and dealing with Khayyam’s poems in the contemporary era. On the other hand, the artists of the Tehran school, by reviving the traditional style and Iranian painting to return to their past artistic methods, emphasized against the art of modernism, and dealing with such issues is an attempt to return to the Aryan roots and the past before the era of modernism and modernism. It was in Iran.

Conclusion
In such a modernist atmosphere and thought, how can one connect the dual thought of modernism or contemporaneity and traditional cultural heritage. Therefore, in this research, an attempt will be made to examine and research the orientalist view of the patrons and commissions of these paintings by examining Khayyam’s thought and philosophy and 9 paintings based on Khayyam’s quatrains. The research method of this research is descriptive-analytical and using the resources available in the library and field study. Finally, it can be pointed out that Khayyam’s archaism and Aryan view and the interest of patrons and commissions of works with these oriental themes, caused a return to the literature of the past and dealing with Khayyam’s poems for the first time during Iranian painting from the beginning to it was today. In the space and modernist thought formed in the contemporary era and despite the dual thought of modernism and traditional cultural heritage and in line with the political and cultural developments in the field of modernism, the art of painting for the first time in the history of Iranian painting, new issues such as attention to He paid attention to Khayyam’s poems, which are of special importance both from a literary and social point of view. In the upcoming research, after introducing the contemporary painting of Iran briefly, especially the Tehran school and the artists who especially paid attention to these issues for the first time, and examining Khayyam’s thoughts and philosophical views, he introduced 9 paintings. And after the research about these poems and the oriental view of the patrons and those who commissioned these paintings, it was finally concluded that Khayyam’s archaic and Aryan perspective and his view of life and death were very important in the creation of these works; As it was said before, there are two negative and positive views in Khayyam’s view of the phenomena around him, which in the negative view is to destroy all illusions in the direction of disillusionment, and in this view, the world is considered like a big furnace, from the soil of the past, new forms are created. It is made in it and these molds are constantly reproduced. The visual signs of this view are such as the world, the KohnehRobat, the desert of nothingness, the urn, the urn, the rotting and scattered human corpses, and the flowerpot, which in the review of these 9 works, the details of the names were presented in 3 Table. In addition, the second point of view, the positive point of view, is trying to find the moment of your presence and show that all phenomena are transitory. In this strange point of view, the end that awaits all human beings is predictable and the pure act of consciousness through drunkenness of wine or a sharp look. Which arises from phenomena, which, of course, was explained that this type of view arose from the literature of the pub and the interpretive view that arose from it. The visual signs of this view include cups, bowls, wine, bartenders, drunk people, young women, candles, flowers, and butterflies, examples of which were presented in table number three. Also, the interest of patrons and patrons of works with these oriental themes, which were of great interest to many patrons and enthusiasts at that time, is also of great importance, and this attention causes a return to the literature of the past and dealing with Khayyam’s poems. Became in contemporary times. On the other hand, the artists of the Tehran school, by reviving the traditional style and Iranian painting, emphasized to return to their past artistic methods against the art of modernism, and dealing with such issues is an attempt to return to their Aryan roots and their past before the era. It was modernity and modernism.