logo
year 8, Issue 27 (5-2024)                   Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2024, 8(27): 7-36 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Akbari Zarrin Qabaei A, Azizi Kharanaghi M H. (2024). The Description, Classification and Typology of Late Neolithic And Transitional Chalcolithic Periods (Cheshmeh Ali) Pottery at Tepe Pahlavan, Northeastern of The Iranian Plateau. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 8(27), 7-36. doi:10.22034/PJAS.8.27.7
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-621-en.html
1- M.A. Graduate in Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , afshinakbari18@gmail.com
2- Assistant Professor, Iranian Center for Archaeological Research (ICAR), Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism (RICHT), Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (2396 Views)
Abstract
The northeastern region of Iran, characterized by a diverse and expansive landscape, has been a significant area for cultural and commercial exchanges throughout history. The geographical features, including parallel mountain ranges, natural valleys, and basins, have facilitated interactions between the peripheral desert plains, the eastern Alborz Mountain, and the Iranian Plateau with Central Asian regions. The Tepe Pahlavan, located in the northern-southern valley of Jajarm in North Khorasan Province, serves as a valuable example for studying inter-regional cultural trends during the Late Neolithic and Transitional Chalcolithic periods. The present research used a descriptive-analytical methodology to investigate the pottery assemblage retrieved from Tepe Pahlavan in Northeastern Iran during the Neolithic and Transitional Chalcolithic periods. The study aims to classify and analyze the pottery within both the local and regional contexts to comprehend the pottery traditions prevalent during the aforementioned periods. The pottery assemblage of the site indicates its association with the Eastern Sange Chakhmaq and other Neolithic sites from the Shahrud Plain. Furthermore, the presence of the cultural tradition of Cheshmeh-Ali in the settlement sequence of sites during the Transitional Chalcolithic period demonstrates regional and inter-regional cultural interactions. The pottery of this period at Tepe Pahlavan shares common technical features with the pottery assemblages of the Central Iranian Plateau and exhibits less diversity in form and decoration. In summary, the Pahlavan site reflects regional cultural interactions during the Neolithic period and inter-regional interactions during the early phase of the Transitional Chalcolithic period in northeastern Iran with the Central Plateau and the northern regions of the Kopet Dag.
Keywords: Northeast Iran, Tepe Pahlavan, Chakhmaq/Jeytun Culture, Cheshmeh-Ali Culture, Typology, Pottery Classification.

Introduction
The northeastern region of Iran boasts a diverse range of ecosystems, from desert and semi-desert mountains to foothill plains and the Caspian Sea coastline. The Jajarm Plain is a strategically located natural corridor, serving as a vital passageway between the Aladagh Mountains, the Atrek Valley, and the northern edge of the Dasht-e Kavir. Geographically, it is divided into two distinct regions - mountainous and desert - and experiences semi-arid conditions with a dry climate. Tepe Pahlavan is a multi-period archaeological site with deposits from the Neolithic, Transitional Chalcolithic, and Islamic Middle Ages. Although previous surveys and documentation by Spooner, Masuda, and Vahdati had been conducted, our 2017 excavation marked the first excavation of the site. Pottery, as a human-made artifact, offers valuable insights into cultural interactions, socio-economic changes, and cultural changes in ancient human societies. Taking a descriptive-analytical approach, our goal is to classify, typologize, and compare the pottery assemblage from Tepe Pahlavan. This study will provide us with a better understanding of the typological and stylistic characteristics of the pottery assemblage, as well as its cultural significance in the Neolithic and Transitional Chalcolithic periods in northeastern Iran.
Refined Research Questions and Hypotheses: 1. What cultural influences have shaped the pottery tradition of Tepe Pahlavan? 2. How does the pottery collection of this site fit into the regional archaeological framework? 3. In what ways has the pottery tradition of Tepe Pahlavan changed over time in response to regional and supra-regional trends?
After examining the ceramic evidence from Tepe Pahlavan during the Neolithic period, it appears that the pottery tradition might have been influenced by the pottery traditions of the Jeitun-chakhmaq and silk I cultures. Additionally, pottery fragments discovered at sites like Cheshmeh Ali, Silk II, Ghaf Khāneh, and Anu similar characteristics to those found at Tepe Pahlavan, suggesting that they could belong to the Transitional Chalcolithic period.

Discussion
During the Tepe Pahlavan excavation, over 2000 pottery sherds were unearthed and meticulously recorded. These fragments can be broadly classified into two distinct chronological groups: late Neolithic and Transitional Chalcolithic, comprising roughly 45% and 55% of the entire assemblage, respectively. These pottery sherds exhibit a range of sizes and unique features.
The archaeological analysis of the pottery discovered at Tepe Pahlavan during the late Neolithic period has revealed significant technical and visual similarities with the late Neolithic pottery of the Shahrud region. These similarities are observed in the forms, paste color, clay quality, surface coating, baking, and motifs. However, there are some minor differences in some of these aspects. One of the notable differences is the tempering agents used in the two regions. The Tepe Pahlavan group mostly used very small pieces of sand and plant inclusions as temper, while in the Shahrud plain, finely crushed plant materials were primarily used. This difference in tempering agents may have been associated with differences in the availability of raw materials or the preferences of the potters. This characteristic makes the pottery of Tepe Pahlavan more similar to the late Jeitun pottery. The surfaces of the pottery at Tepe Pahlavan have been well-executed, but unlike the pottery of the eastern Tepe Chakhmaq and Deh-Kheir, they do not exhibit glossy or burnished surfaces.
The pottery of the Cheshmeh-Ali culture in the central plateau and the northeast region corresponds with the pottery of the Kopet-Dagh region in terms of forms and motifs. The multiplicity and intricacy of motifs in the pottery of the Cheshmeh-Ali horizons in the central plateau are more significant than those in the northeast region. In the northeast region, such as Tepe Pahlavan, Qaleh-Khan, and Aq-Tepe, unlike the central plateau of Iran, examples of pedestal vessels, basket-shaped vessels, and very large jars are absent. Although the motifs in this type mostly consist of geometric, floral, animal, and a few human motifs like central plateau pottery, these are much simpler and less numerous than those found in the central plateau pottery. The motifs in the early Transitional Chalcolithic horizons of Kopet-Dagh are limited to a few geometric designs, such as oblique ladder-like rows, wide bands below the rim, ray-like bands to the vessel base, vertical frames of zigzag bands, and hatched shapes.
The discovery of diverse pottery at Tepe Pahlavan provides valuable information about pottery making in this region during the late Neolithic and Transitional Chalcolithic periods. The observed similarities and differences in the pottery of Tepe Pahlavan with other regions contribute to a better understanding of the cultural relationships and developments during this period.

Conclusion
The pottery assemblage at Tepe Pahlavan is characterized by two distinct chronological periods. Specifically, the assemblage comprises artifacts from the Late Neolithic period, encompassing Eastern Sang-e Chakhmaq, as well as the Cheshmeh Ali culture which represents the Transitional Chalcolithic period. The findings from this excavation provide invaluable insights into the cultural evolution of the region during these periods. The pottery discovered from the Late Neolithic era within this area exhibits a resemblance to the pottery tradition of the Jeitun/Chakhmaq culture, as well as settlements from the latter part of this culture in the Shahroud and Bastam regions. In addition to the similarities, there are minor differences in certain aspects of pottery-making, such as temper and surface treatment, which indicate local characteristics in the pottery-making tradition of the Late Neolithic at Tepe Pahlavan. These local and regional similarities and distinctions continue into the Transitional Chalcolithic period. Despite the strong resemblance between the pottery of this period and the pottery-making tradition of the Cheshmeh Ali culture in the Central Plateau, there are noticeable local characteristics, such as a reduction in the diversity of patterns and vessel forms.
The available dating samples from Tepe Pahlavan provide evidence of multiple settlements within the time frame of 5800-4800 BCE in the surrounding area. The cultural materials and settlement sequence of this area correspond with the Late Neolithic in northeastern Iran, specifically in Strata 3 to 1 of Eastern Sang-e Chakhmaq within the time frame of 5800-5300 BCE, and the early phase of the Transitional Chalcolithic within the time range of 5200-4800 BCE. This serves as strong evidence of regional similarities between the pottery of Tepe Pahlavan and the surrounding areas and sites of the Central Plateau. There is strong evidence of a correlation between the pottery tradition of this site and the Shahrud region. The cultural materials found at Tepe Pahlavan, along with absolute dating, reveal the emergence and replacement of the Cheshmeh Ali horizon following the Jeitun/Chakhmaq horizon. While Tepe Pahlavan samples have been primarily dated to the 6th and early 5th millennium BCE, there remains uncertainty regarding the replacement of the Cheshmeh Ali culture by the cultural practices of the Transitional Chalcolithic period at a local and regional level. This is largely due to the scarcity of well-preserved layers from the Late Neolithic and early Transitional Chalcolithic periods in the cultural stratigraphy of the area.
Full-Text [PDF 1681 kb]   (430 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2021/08/11 | Accepted: 2021/10/18 | Published: 2024/05/30

References
1. - روستایی، کوروش، (1393). «فرآیند نوسنگی گرایی در شمال‌شرق فلات ایران». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشرنشده).
2. - عباس‌نژاد سرستی، رحمت؛ و فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن، (1394). «جوامع درحال گذار یا سلسله‌مراتبی: پیچیدگی‌های اقتصادی، اجتماعی و برهم‌کنش‌های فرهنگی در پیش‌ازتاریخ دشت قزوین». در: مرتضی حصاری (گردآورنده)، مفاخر میراث‌فرهنگی ایران؛ جشن‌نامۀ دکتر صادق ملک‌شهمیرزادی، 45-52.
3. - عباسی، قربانعلی، (1390). گزارش پایانی کاوش‌های باستان‌شناختی نرگس‌تپه دشت گرگان. تهران: گنجینه نقش‌جهان.
4. - عزیزی‌خرانقی، محمدحسین؛ اکبری زرین‌قبائی، افشین؛ مشکور، مرجان؛ و جمشیدی‌یگانه، سپیده، (1401). «تپه‌پهلوان؛ استقراری از دوران نوسنگی جدید و مس‌وسنگ انتقالی در شمال‌شرق ایران». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 12(32)، 7-30. doi: 10.22084/NB.2021.21466.2122.
5. - اسفندیاری، آزرمیدخت، (1378). جایگاه فرهنگ چشمه علی در فلات‌مرکزی. تهران: معاونت پژوهشی پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی.
6. - فخرقائمی، حمیده، (1390). «فرآیند گذر از دورۀ نوسنگی به مس‌وسنگ در دشت سملقان با تأکید بر کاوش باستان‌شناختی قلعه‌خان». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه سیستان‌وبلوچستان، زاهدان (منتشرنشده).
7. - گریشمن، رومن، (1379). سیلک کاشان (جلد اول). ترجمۀ اصغر کریمی، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
8. - مجید‌زاده، یوسف، (1389). کاوش‌های محوطۀ باستانی ازبکی، جلد دوم: سفال. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری.
9. - ملک‌شهمیرزادی، صادق؛ و نوکنده، جبرئیل، (1379). آق‌تپه. تهران: معاونت پژوهشی سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
10. - ولی‌پور، حمیدرضا؛ فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن؛ و عزیزی‌خرانقی، محمدحسین، (1388). «گونه‌شناسی سفال‌های دورۀ نوسنگی جدید و مس‌وسنگ دشت تهران (مطالعه موردی تپه‌پردیس ورامین)». پیام باستان‌شناس، 12: 13-35. https://www.sid.ir/paper/128805/fa.
12. - Azizi-Kharanaghi, M.; Akbari, A.; Mashkour, M. & Jamshidi Yeganeh, S., (2022). “Tappeh Pahlavan, a Late Neolithic and Transitional Chalcolithic Site in North East of Iran”. Pazhoheshha-ye Bastan shenasi Iran, 12(32): 7-30. doi: 10.22084/nb.2021.21466.2122. (In Persian).
13. - Abbasi, G. A., (2011). The final report of excavations at Narges Tappeh, Gorgan Plain. Ganjineh Naghsh-e Jahan. (In Persian).
14. - Abbasnejad Seresti, R. & Fazeli Nashli, H., (2015). “Transitional or hierarchical societies: Economic complexities, social interactions, and cultural interplays in the prehistory of the Qazvin Plain”. In: M. Hassari (Ed.), Celebration volume for Dr. Sadegh Malek Shahmirzadi (pp: 45-52). Iran Cultural Heritage. (In Persian).
15. - Coon, C. S., (1951). Cave explorations in Iran: 1949. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.
16. - Coon, C. S., (1952). “Excavations in Hotu Cave, Iran, 1951, A preliminary report”. American Philosophical Society, 96: 231–269. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Proceedings_American_Philosophical_Socie/sifpE9_pgi4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA258&printsec=frontcover
17. - Coon, C. S., (1957). The seven caves: Archaeological explorations in the Middle East. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
18. - Crawford, V. E., (1963). “Beside the Kara Su”. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, 21(8): 263–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/3257948.
19. - Deshayes, J., (1967). “Céramiques Peintes de Tureng”. IRAN, 5(1): 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.1967.11834767.
20. - Deshayes, J., (1973). “Rapport preliminaire sur la neuvieme campagne de fouille a Tureng Tepe (1971)”. IRAN, 11(1): 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.1973.11834174
21. - Dyson, R. H. & Howard, M., (1976). Tappeh hesar; Reports of the Restudy Project, 1976. Casa Editrice le lettere. Firenze: Case Editrice le Lettere.
22. - Dyson, R. H. & Thornton, C. R., (2009). “Shir-i Shian and the Fifth-Millennium Sequence of Northern Iran”. IRAN, 47(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.2009.11864756
23. - Esfandiari, A., (1999). The status of Cheshmeali culture in the central plateau. Institute of Archaeology. (In Persian).
24. - Fakharghaemi, H., (2011). “The Transition Process from the Neolithic to the Copper-Stone Age in the Samalqan Plain with Emphasis on the Archaeological Excavation of Ghaleh-Khan” (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan. (In Persian).
25. - Garazhian, O., (2012). “Recent Excavations at Tapeh Baluch (Baluch Mound): A Neolithic Site in Neyshabur Plain, NE Iran”. Neo-Lithics, 2(12): 20–31. https://www.exoriente.org/repository/NEO-LITHICS/NEO-LITHICS_2012_2.pdf
26. - Garazhian, O.; Yazdi, L. P. & Ghaemi, H. F. E., (2014). “Qaleh Khan a Site in Northern Khorassan and the Neolithic of North Eastern Iranian Plateau”. Archaologische Mitteilungen Aus Iran Und Turan, 46: 21–50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316522600_Qaleh_Khan_a_site_in_northern_khorassan_and_the_Neolithic_of_north_eastern_Iranian_plateau
27. - Ghirshman, R., (2000). Sialk I (Vol. 1). (A. Karimi, Trans.). Iran National Heritage Organization. (In Persian).
28. - Hiebert, F. T. & Kurbansakhatov, K., (2003). A central Asian village at The dawn of civilization: Excavations at Anau, Turkmenistan. (Vol. University). Philadelphia: UPenn Museum of Archaeology.
29. - Kohl, P. L., (1984). Central Asia: Paleolithic Beginnings to the Iron Age (Vol. 14). Éditions Recherche sur les civilisations.
30. - Majidzadeh, Y., (2010). Excavations at the archaeological site of Ozbaki, Volume II: Pottery. Iran Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization. (In Persian).
31. - Malek Shahmirzadi, S. & Nokandeh, J., (2000). Aq Tappeh. Tehran: Iranian Center for Archaeological Research. (In Persian).
32. - Masson, V. M. & Sarianidi, V., (1972). Central Asia: Turkmenia before the Achaemenids. London: Thames and Hudson.
33. - Masuda, S., (1973). “Excavations at Tappe Sang-e Cagmaq”. In: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Symposium of Archaeological Research in Iran, 1972: 1–6.
34. - Masuda, S., (1974). “Excavations at Tappeh Sang-e Çagmaq”. In: F. Bagherzadeh (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Symposium of Archaeological Research in Iran, 1973: 23–33.
35. - Masuda, S., (1976). “Report of the Archaeological Investigations at Šahrud, 1975”. In: F. Bagherzadeh (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Archaeological Research in Iran: 63–70.
36. - Masuda, S.; Goto, T.; Iwasaki, T.; Kamuro, H.; Ferusato, S.; Ikeda, J.; … Tsuneki, A., (2013). “Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq: Investigations of a Neolithic site in Northeastern Iran”. In: R. J. Matthews & F. H. Nashli (Eds.), The Neolithisation of Iran. The formation of new societies: 201–240. Oxford: Oxbow Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dp0q
37. - Nakamura, T., (2014). “Radiocarbon dating of charcoal remains excavated from Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq”. In: A. Tsuneki (Ed.), The first farming village in northeast Iran and Turan: Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq and beyond: 9–12. University of Tsukuba. https://rcwasia.hass.tsukuba.ac.jp/kaken/contents/content%20images/booklets/Chakhmaq%20abstract.pdf
38. - Pollard, A. M.; Nashli, H. F.; Davoudi, H.; Sarlak, S.; Helwing, B. & Saeidi, F., (2013). “A New Radiocarbon chronology for the North Central Plateau of Iran from the Late Neolithic to the Iron Age”. Archäologische Mitteilungen Aus Iran Und Turan, 45: 27–50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325541866_A_new_radiocarbon_chronology_for_the_North_Central_Plateau_of_Iran_from_the_late_Neolithic_to_the_Iron_Age
39. - Pumpelly, R., (1908). Explorations in Turkestan, Expedition of 1904: Prehistoric Civilizations of Anau, Origins, Growth, and Influence of Environment (Vol. 73). Carnegie institution of Washington.
40. - Rezvani, H. & Roustaei, K., (2016). “Preliminary Report on Two Seasons of Excavations at Tappeh Deh Kheir, Bastam Plain, Northeast Iran”. In: M. Mashkour & K. Roustaei (Eds.), The Neolithic of the Iranian Plateau: Recent Research: 15–52.
41. - Roustaei, K., (2012). “Archaeological survey of the Šahrud area, Northeast Iran: A landscape approach”. Archaologische Mitteilungen Aus Iran Und Turan, 44: 191–219.
42. - Roustaei, K. (2014). “The Neolithisation of Northeastern Iranian Plateau”. (Doctoral dissertation). Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. (In Persian).
43. - Roustaei, K., (2016a). “An emerging picture of the neolithic of northeast Iran”. Iranica Antiqua, 51: 21–55. DOI: 10.2143/IA.51.0.3117827.
44. - Roustaei, K., (2016b). “Kalāteh Khān: A Sixth Millennium BC Site in the Shahroud Plain, Northeast Iran”. In: Kourosh Roustaei & M. Mashkour (Eds.), The Neolithic of the Iranian Plateau: Recent Research: 53–84. Ex Oriente SV - 18.
45. - Roustaei, K., (2018). “Beyond the Mounds: Insights into a late sixth millennium BCE sherd scatter site in the Shahroud plain, northeast Iran”. Ancient Near Eastern Studies, 55: 143–182. DOI: 10.2143/ANES.55.0.3284689 .
46. - Roustaei, K.; Mashkour, M. & Tengberg, M., (2015). “Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq and the Beginning of the Neolithic in North-East Iran”. Antiquity, 89(345): 573–595. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2015.26
47. - Roustaei, K. & Nokandeh, J., (2017). “Neolithic developments in the Gorgan Plain, south-east of the Caspian Sea”. Antiquity, 91(358). https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.124
48. - Schmidt, E. F., (1935). “Excavation at Ray”. Bulletin of the University Museum, 5(4): 25–27.
49. - Schmidt, E. F., (1937). Excavation at Tepe Hissar, Damghan, 1931-1933. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press for the University Museum.
50. - Schönicke, J., (2019). “The Pottery from Monjukli Depe and its Visual Affordance”. In: S. Pollock, R. Bernbeck, & B. Ögüt (Eds.), Looking Closely: Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010-2014, Volume 1: 289–352. Leiden: Sidestone Press.
51. - Spooner, B., (1965). “Arghiyān. The Area of Jājarm in Western Khurāsān”. IRAN, 3(1): 97. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.1965.11834403
52. - Stronach, D., (1972). “Yarim tepe”. In: International Congress of Iranian Art and Archaeology: 21–23.
53. - Thornton, C. P., (2013). “Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq: A New Look”. In: R. Matthews & H. Fazeli Nashli (Eds.), The Neolithisation of Iran. The formation of new societies: 241–257. Oxbow Books.
54. - Tsuneki, A., (2014). “Pottery and Other Objects from Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq”. In: A. Tsuneki (Ed.), The first farming village in northeast Iran and Turan: Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq and beyond: 13–18. University of Tsukuba.
55. - Tsuneki, A., (2017). “The Emergence of Pottery in Northeast Iran: The Case Study of Tappeh Sang-e Chakhmaq”. In: A. Tsuneki, O. Nieuwenhuyse, & S. Campbell (Eds.), The Emergence of Pottery in West Asia: 119–132. Oxbow Books.
56. - Valipour, H.; Fazeli Nashli, H. & Azizi Kharanaghi, M. H., (2009). “Typology of the Pottery from the Late Neolithic and Chalcolithic Periods in the Tehran Plain (Case study: Tepe Pardis, Varamin)”. Payam-e Bastanshenās, 12, 13-35. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/128805/fa
57. - Voigt, M. M. & Dyson, R. H., (1986). “Chronology of Iran Ca. 8000-2000 BC”. In R. W. Ehrich (Ed.), Chronologies in old world Archaeology (Vol. I & II: 125–153). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
58. - Wong, E. H.; Petrie, C. A. & Fazeli, H., (2010). “Cheshmeh Ali Ware: A Petrographic and Geochemical Study of a Transitional Chalcolithic Period Ceramic Industry on the Northern Central Plateau of Iran”. IRAN, 48(1): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.2010.11864770
59. - Yousefi Zoshk, R. & Zeighami, M., (2013). “Northeastern Iran in the Neolithic: The Site of Pookerdvall”. In: R. Matthews & H. Fazeli Nashli (Eds.), The Neolithisation of Iran. The Formation of New Societies: 256–271. Oxford: Oxbow Books.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.