logo
year 8, Issue 27 (5-2024)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2024, 8(27): 259-288 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Garavand A, Javanmardzadeh A, Hosseyni Niya M, Malekpur F. (2024). Chronology of Shams Tabrizi Khoy Site based on Pottery Obtained from Archaeological Excavations. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 8(27), 259-288. doi:10.22034/PJAS.8.27.259
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-573-en.html
1- PhD in Archaeology, Head of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts of Khoy and Salmas Cities, Khoy, Iran , garavand.afra@gmail.com
2- Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran
3- Post Doctorate in Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran
4- M. A. in Archeology, Department of Archaeology, General Directorate of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts of West Azerbaijan, Khoy, Iran
Abstract:   (1858 Views)
Abstract
Khoy county, as one of the archeological fields of Iran, has been one of the most important centers for the presence of human societies, and the process of formation of ancient societies from prehistoric to historical and Islamic eras is quite obvious and can be explored. One of the landmarks of this city is Shams Tabrizi, which is located in the northwest of Khoy county between Rabat neighborhood and Imamzadeh neighborhood, and on its southern front, there is a monument called Shams Tabrizi minaret. This area was excavated in 2007, in 2018, with the aim of studying the layers and archaeological deposits and being aware of the existence of cultural periods, by creating 3 boreholes in the northern and eastern parts. This research is the result of studying the pottery data of the mentioned area. Accordingly, the main question of this research is posed as follows; Given the diversity of pottery species and their adaptation to other sites, what cultural periods does the site chronology include? Findings of this study; The pottery of this area is classified into two main groups of glazed pottery (monochrome pottery, multicolor painting on glaze and painting under glaze and Esgrafiato) and unglazed (molded and ordinary pottery) based on the typology of pottery. And their adaptation to other areas should be said; Shams Tabrizi Khoy area is a settlement belonging to the Middle Ages to the late Islamic period. The peak of prosperity of this area was related to the Middle Islamic centuries and it should also be noted that the pottery index species show close similarities with other centers in the northwest and west. It indicates the existence of an extensive communication and cultural network in the region, and historical texts and travelogues reinforce this conclusion.
Keywords: Khoy County, Shams Tabrizi Area, Pottery, Chronology.

Introduction
The city of Khoy has been an important gateway and a crossroads for trade in distant and nearby lands. This area, due to its location in communication centers, connects to the Urmia Lake basin on one side, the southern Caucasus region on the other side, and the eastern Anatolia, making it strategically important for prehistoric societies and significant in studies related to the formation of societies. The region’s archaeological explorations indicate that the oldest settlements in the area date back to the late Neolithic period (sixth millennium BCE). The environmental and biological components of the region have created favorable conditions for permanent and temporary settlements in various cultural periods, playing a very important role throughout history. Despite its great importance in Iranian archaeology, this region has received less attention. However, archaeological findings and historical documents attest to the significance of this region in cultural periods. In the field of archaeology, ceramic findings in the stratigraphy of sites and the study of cultural changes are of great importance. Systematic research on the types of ceramics in the Shams Tabrizi Khoy area is no exception to this rule. Given the lack of attention to this site in Iranian archaeology studies, it is necessary to investigate and study these data, as archaeological findings and historical documents indicate the importance of this region in cultural periods. The study of ceramic typology in this region is essential for understanding the prosperity and decline of the city, as well as cultural and trade relations with neighboring regions. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to study the Islamic period ceramics of this site, their typology, and relative stratigraphy. In the study of ceramics resulting from excavation and considering the type of data, the following questions are raised: 1) Which areas have similarities with the incised ceramics in this site? 2) Which regions have similarities with the turquoise-black ink ceramics of this site? 3) Based on the comparative study of ceramic types, what are the fundamental steps in understanding the prosperity and decline of the city and its cultural and trade relations with neighboring regions?

The Text of the Article
The Shams Tabrizi complex is located in the northwest of the city of Khoy, situated between the Rabat and Imamzadeh neighborhoods. Three trenches were created in the north and east fronts of the complex for identifying layers and accessing cultural deposits. Regarding the typology of ceramics in the Shams Tabrizi complex and their similarities with other complexes, it can be said that similar ceramics have been found in regions such as Rey, Sultaniyeh, Saveh, Sultanabad, Kashan, Hamadan, Bojnourd, Aqkand, Yazkand, Sultaniyeh, Sheikh Tappeh in Urmia, and others. Khoy was part of the Seljuk territories, especially under the Seljuk Rum branch, due to its strategic location on the trade route between the East and West. During the reign of Sultan Sanjar Seljuki, he appointed Khoy as a peer to Rey and considered Khoy and Rey as part of his special territories. The similarity of ceramic types with Rey is evidence of this statement. After flourishing during the Seljuk era and suffering damage during the Mongol invasions, especially in 628 AH, Khoy gradually regained its prosperity during the Ilkhanid period. Ceramics from the Ilkhanid period have been found in this complex, comparable to complexes of that time. In the Safavid era, Khoy gained attention from Shah Ismail I, who chose it as his winter capital. Historical sources indicate that Islamic historians attribute Khoy’s prosperity and fame to the middle centuries, particularly the 5th to 8th centuries AH. Ceramics from this period show undeniable similarities with complexes in eastern, western, and central Iran, likely due to cultural, economic, and trade exchanges between Khoy and those centers. Key ceramic types in this complex include multicolored underglaze, simple turquoise glazed ceramics, red and beige ceramics with black, blue, and purple patterns under and over turquoise and white glazes, orange and reddish ceramics with black patterns under yellow, turquoise, white, and aubergine glazes, orange ceramics with black and crackled (sgraffito) patterns under turquoise glazes, and unglazed ceramics.

Conclusion
Based on the archaeological studies and historical texts such as Ibn Hawqal, Masudi, Hamawi, and Emad al-Din Zakariya, Khoy has been a prosperous city during the Islamic period, especially from the 5th to the 8th centuries AD, due to its location on the East-West trade route. The pottery collection unearthed from the archaeological excavations of the Shams Tabrizi area also indicates that this region had cultural, commercial, and economic interactions with other centers during that time, reaching its peak during the Seljuk and Safavid periods. However, due to political and historical events, especially during the Ilkhanid and Safavid periods, all its cultural achievements were destroyed by invaders such as the Mongols and Ottomans (during the reign of Suleiman, Murad III, and Murad IV). Nevertheless, it has managed to regain its dynamism and greatness.
In this regard, the Shams Tabrizi area in Khoy is one of the prominent Islamic settlements in the region, possessing valuable cultural data, including diverse pottery artifacts. These pottery artifacts, classified based on comparative typology, belong to the Middle to Late Islamic periods and are divided into two main groups: glazed and unglazed pottery. The unglazed pottery consists of molded pottery and ordinary pottery, while the glazed pottery includes single-colored glaze, multi-colored glaze, overglaze painting, underglaze painting, and sgraffito. Due to the diversity of pottery types in terms of form, they mostly consist of various pottery bowls, and in terms of technique and decoration, they include distinctive types such as sgraffito, molded pottery, underglaze painting, and overglaze painting. Therefore, it can be said that pottery known as sgraffito in other regions such as Aqkand, Yazkand, Sultaniyeh, Sheikh Tappeh in Urmia, Hamadan, Kangavar, Taq-e Bostan, and Takht-e Soleiman, has been obtained, and in terms of style and technique, there are similarities between the turquoise pottery of this area and other regions in some cases. Similar turquoise pottery from this area has been obtained in Sultanabad, Kashan, Sultaniyeh, Hamadan, Bojnourd, and other regions, and can be compared to them in this respect. The results of the study of different types of pottery in the Shams Tabrizi area indicate that the pottery of this area mainly belongs to the Middle Islamic periods.
Full-Text [PDF 1631 kb]   (513 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2022/05/17 | Accepted: 2022/08/24 | Published: 2024/05/30

References
1. - ابن‌حوقل، (1345). ایران در صوره‌الارض. ترجمۀ جعفر شعار، تهران: بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
2. - اصطخری، ابواسحاق ابراهیم، (1340). ترجمۀ مسالک و الممالک. به‌کوشش: ایرج افشار، تهران: بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب.
3. - امیرحاجلو، سعید؛ و سقایی، سارا، (1397). «گسترش و تنوع گونه‌های سفال دوران اسلامی در سکونت‌های دشت نرماشیر کرمان». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 19: 226-207. DOI: 10.22084/NBSH.2019.17433.1823
4. - انصاری‌قزوینی، زکریا بن محمد بن محمود، (1366)، آثار البلاد و اخبارالعباد. تصحیح: سبوحی از روی چاپ تهران و هند.
5. - بهرامی، مهدی، (1327). صنایع ایران (ظروف سفالین). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
6. - تهرانی‌مقدم، جلال، (1313). تاریخ قم. چاپ تهران.
7. - توحیدی، فائق، (1379). فن و هنر سفالگری. تهران: سمت.
8. - جابز، گرترود، (1379). سمبل‌ها. کتاب اول، «جانوران». تهران: انتشارات کامیاب.
9. - چوبک، حمیده، (1391). «سفالینه‌های دوران اسلامی-شهر کهن جیرفت». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 4 (1): 112- 83. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2012.35377
10. - حبیبی، منصوره، (1381). «سیلک، نمادها و نشانه‌ها». کتاب ماه هنر، 45 و 50: 122-118.
11. - حیدری، رضا، (1386). «گمانه‌زنی محوطۀ منارۀ شمس تبریزی خوی». ارمیه: مرکز اسناد ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان آذربایجان‌غربی (منتشر‌نشده).
12. - حیدری، رضا؛ و عفیفی، ریحانه، (1381). «بررسی باستان‌شناختی شهرستان خوی جلد اول تا سوم». ارمیه: مرکز اسناد ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان آذربایجان‌غربی (منتشر‌نشده).
13. - حیدری، نرجس؛ عباس‌نژاد‌سرستی، رحمت؛ و فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن، (1397). «برهمکنش‌های فرهنگی عصرمفرغ مازندران برپایه داده‌های سفالی». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 17: 74-57. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2018.220765.142355
14. - خدادوست، جواد؛ موسوی‌حاجی، سید‌رسول؛ تقوی، عابد؛ و پور‌علی‌یاری‌گوکی، شهین، (1396). «بررسی و مطالعه تحلیلی سفالینه‌های محوطۀ مالین، شهرستان باخَرز (خراسان رضوی)». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 7(13): 172-157. DOI: 10.22084/NBSH.2017.6934.1289
15. - رفیعی، لیلا، (1377). سفال ایران از دوران پیش‌از‌تاریخ تا عصر‌حاضر. تهران: یساولی.
16. - ریاحی، محمدامین، (1375). «تربت شمس کجاست؟». مجلۀ کلک، 72: 28-29.
17. - ریاحی، محمد‌امین، (1378). تاریخ خوی. تهران: انتشارات طرح‌نو.
18. - زارعی، محمد‌ابراهیم؛ خاکسار، علی؛ مترجم، عباس؛ امینی، فرهاد؛ و دینی، اعظم، (1393)، «بررسی و مطالعه سفال‌های ایلخانی به‌دست آمده از کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی ارزانفود». مجلۀ مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 6 (2): 90-73. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2015.54174
19. - زریاب‌خوئی، عباس، (1366). «سازمان اداری ایران در زمان ایلخانان (2)». مجلۀ باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، 2 (1): 39-29.
20. - دیماند، س. م.، (1365). راهنمای صنایع اسلامی. ترجمۀ عبدالله فریار، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
21. - دژم‌خوی، مریم، (1386). «نظری اجمالی به سفال قالب زدۀ عصر سلجوقی». باستان پژوهی، 9 (15): 31-27.
22. - سرلو، خوان ادوارد، (1388). فرهنگ نمادها. ترجمۀ مهر‌انگیز اوحدی، تهران: دستان.
23. - شاطری، میترا، (1394). «حوزه‌بندی گونۀ نقش‌کنده در گلابه در ایران (مطالعه موردی حوزۀ شرق و جنوب‌شرق)». دومین همایش ملی باستان‌شناسی ایران: 20-1.
24. - شریف‌کاظمی، خدیجه؛ محمدیان، فخرالدین؛ و موسوی‌حاجی، سیدرسول، (1396). «مطالعۀ نقش‌مایه‌های هندسی سفالینه‌های دوران میانی اسلام». هنرهای زیبا-هنرهای تجسمی، 22 (4): 100-87. DOI: 10.22059/JFAVA.2017.64030
25. - عابدی، اکبر، (1392). «گزارش کاوش باستان‌شناختی محوطۀ دوه‌گُز خوی». مرکز اسناد ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان آذربایجان‌غربی (منتشر‌نشده).
26. - عابدی، اکبر، (1395). «گاهنگاری مطلق (14C) و نسبی محوطه دوه‌گُز خوی با استفاده از روش طیف‌سنج جرمی شتاب‌دهندۀ (AMS)؛ شواهدی از دورۀ مس و سنگ انتقالی، دالما و پیزدلی». پژوهه باستان‌سنجی، 2 (1): 54-39. DOI: 10.29252/jra.2.1.39
27. - قوچانی، عبدالله، (1366). «کوزۀ فقاع». مجلۀ باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، 2 (1): 45-40.
28. - کارگر، بهمن، (1383). «قالایچی: زیرتو مرکز مانا لایۀ IB، 1381-1378». مجموعه مقالات همایش بین‌المللی باستان‌شناسی ایران: حوزۀ شمال‌غرب، به‌کوشش: مسعود آذرنوش، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی وگردشگری (پژوهشگاه)، پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی: 249-225.
29. - کوپر، جی. سی.، (1386). فرهنگ مصور نمادهای سنتی. ترجمۀ ملیحه کرباسیان، تهران: فرشاد.
30. - -کیانی، محمدیوسف، (1379). معماری ایران: دورۀ اسلامی. تهران: سمت
31. - کیانی، محمدیوسف؛ و کریمی، فاطمه، (1364). هنر سفالگری دورۀ اسلامی ایران. تهران: دانشکدۀ علوم توانبخشی، مرکز باستان‌شناسی ایران.
32. - گراوند، افراسیاب، (1400). «گزارش گمانه‌زنی به‌منظور لایه‌نگاری و تعیین عرصه و پیشنهاد حریم تپه‌چای خوی». ارومیه: مرکز اسناد ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان آذربایجان‌غربی (منتشر‌نشده).
33. - گراوند، افراسیاب؛ و ملک‌پور، فاطمه، (1396الف). «گمانه‌زنی محوطۀ دوزداغی خوی؛ محوطه‌ای در شمال‌غرب ایران». جستارهای باستان‌شناسی ایران پیش از اسلام. 4: 48-31. https://iaej.sku.ac.ir/article_10176.html
34. - گراوند، افراسیاب؛ و رضالو، رضا، (1397). «تفسیر شمایل‌نگارانه نقوش جانوری در قره‌کلیسا- چالدران». فصلنامۀ باستان‌شناسی پارسه، 6: 155-139. DOI: ‎ 10.30699/PJAS.2.6.143
35. - گراوند، افراسیاب؛ حاجی‌زاده، کریم؛ ملک‌پور، فاطمه؛ و عابدی، اکبر، (1398). «محوطۀ دوزداغی خوی استقرارگاهی از عصرمفرغ در شمال دریاچۀ ارومیه». فصلنامۀ باستان‌شناسی پارسه، شمارۀ 10: 37-25. DOI: 10.30699/PJAS.3.10.25
36. - لک‌‌پور، سیمین، (1389). کاوش‌ها و پژوهش‌های باستانی دره‌شهر (سیمره). تهران: پازینه.
37. - مخلصی، محمدعلی، (1379). «مناره‌ها». در: معماری ایران دورۀ اسلامی، گردآورنده محمد‌یوسف کیانی، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
38. - مستوفی، حمدالله، (1362). نزهه‌القلوب. به اهتمام: گای لسترنج، تهران: دنیای کتاب.
39. - مطراقچی، نصوحی‌السلاحی، (1379). بیان منازل سفر عراقین. ترجمه و تعلیق: رحیم رئیس‌نیا، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
40. - مقدم، علیرضا، (1390). «نگاهی بر کتاب مزارات خوی». گزارش میراث، 47-48: 90-89.
41. - ملک‌پور، فاطمه؛ و گراوند، افراسیاب، (1395)، «گزارش گمانه‌زنی تعیین عرصه و حریم محوطه دوزداغی خوی». ارومیه: مرکز اسناد ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان آذربایجان‌غربی (منتشر‌نشده).
42. - ملک‌پور، فاطمه؛ و گراوند، افراسیاب، (1397). «گزارش گمانه‌زنی محوطۀ شمس تبریزی خوی». ارومیه: مرکز اسناد ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان آذربایجان‌غربی (منتشر‌نشده).
43. - ملک‌پور، فاطمه، (1389). «مطالعه و تحلیل الگوهای استقراری مس‌وسنگ تا پایان مفرغ قدیم شهرستان‌های خوی و سلماس». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ابهر (منتشرنشده).
44. - ولایتی، رحیم، (1396). گزارش کاوش وگمانه زنی به منظور تعیین عرصه وحریم شهر تاریخی اوجان- آذربایجان شرقی. تبریز: مرکز اسناد ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان آذربایجان‌شرقی (منتشر‌نشده).
45. - یاقوت‌حموی، شهاب‌الدین ابوعبدالله، (1323). معجم البلدان. ترجمۀ منزوی، بیروت: دارالاحیاء التراث العربی.
47. - Abedi, A., (2016). “Absolute (14C AMS) and Relative Chronology of Dava Göz Khoy; New Evidence of Transitional Chalcolithic”. Dalma and Pisdeli Cultures in NW IRAN, 2 (1): 39-54. https://doi:10.29252/jra.2.1.39 (In Persian).
48. - Abedi, A., (2012). “Report of the archeological exploration of the Dohgoz Khoi area”. Document center of the General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of West Azarbaijan province (unpublished), (In Persian).
49. - Amirhajloo, S. & Amirhajloo, S. (2019). “Distribution, Continuity and Diversity of Islamic Ceramics in the Settlements of Narmashir Plain, Kerman”. Pazhoheshha-ye Bastan shenasi Iran, 8(19): 207-226. https://doi: 10.22084/nbsh.2019.17433.1823 [in Persian].
50. - Ansari Qazvini, Z. M., (1366). The works of Al-Bilad and Akhbar al-Abad. Sabuhi's correction from Tehran and India (In Persian).
51. - Atil, E., (1973). Freer gallery of Art Fifth Anniversary Exhibition III, ceramic from the world of Islam. Wasingtin: Smthonian Institutation (In Persian).
52. - Bahrami, M., (1984). Iranian Industries (Ceramic Pottery). Tehran: Tehran University Press.
53. - Choubak, H., (2012). “Islamic pottery of ancient city of Jiroft”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 4(1): 83-112. https://doi:10.22059/jarcs.2012.35377 (In Persian).
54. - Cooper, J., (2007). Illustrated Dictionary of Traditional Symbols. Translated by: Maliha Karbasian, Tehran: Farshad (In Persian).
55. - Demand, S. M., (2016). Guide to Islamic Industries. Translated by: Abdullah Faryar, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural (In Persian).
56. - Dezhmkhoy, M., (2006). “A brief overview of molded pottery of the Seljuk era”. Bastanpajuhi, 9(15): 27-31 (In Persian).
57. - Fehervari, G., (1980). Islamic Metalwork of the eight to the fifteenth century in the Keir collection. Faber & Faber, London (In Persian).
58. - Garavand, A.; Hajizadeh, K.; Malekpuor, F. & Abedi, A., (2020). “The Dozdaqi Area; Establishment of Bronze Age in the North of Urmia Lake”. Parseh J Archaeol Stud., 3(10): 25-37. https://doi:10.30699/PJAS.3.10.25 (In Persian).
59. - Garavand, A. & Rezalou, R., (2019). “Iconographic Interpretation of Animal Designs in the Ghareh Klisa of Chaldoran”. Parseh J Archaeol Stud., 2(6): 143-159. https://doi:10.30699/PJAS.2.6.143 (In Persian).
60. - Garavand, A. & Malekpur, F., (2018). “Speculation on Duzdaqi Khoy area,An area in northwestern Iran”. Journal of Iran's Pre Islamic Archaeological Essays, 2(2): 31-48 (In Persian).
61. - Gravand, A., (2021). “Speculation report in order to stratify and determine the area and proposal of Tepechai Khoi's sanctuary”. Urmia: Document Center of the General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of West Azarbaijan Province (Unpublished), (In Persian).
62. - Gravand, A., (2021). “Speculation report in order to stratify and determine the area and proposal of Tepechai Khoi's sanctuary”. Urmia: Document Center of the General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of West Azarbaijan Province (unpublished), (In Persian).
63. - Grube, E, J., (1991). “Ceramics xiv, the Islamic period 11 the 15th”. in: Encyclopedia Iranica, 5 (3): 311-327 (In Persian). https://iranicaonline.org/articles/ceramics-xiv
64. - Habibi, M., (2001). “Silk, Symbols and Signs”. Book of the Month of Art, 45 and 50: 122-118 (In Persian).
65. - Hall, A. R., (1934). “A new collection of Islamic Pottery". Bulletin of the Museum of Fine Arts, 32: 58-67 (In Persian).
66. - Hamavi, Y., (1944). Mojam al baladan. Vol 8. Translate by: Ali Naghi Manzavi. Tehran: Cultural Heritage [in Persian].
67. - Hamlin, C., (1975). “Dalma Tape”. Iran, 13: 111-127 (In Persian).
68. - Heydari, N.; Abbasnejad, R. & Fazeli, H., (2018). “Cultural Interactions in Mazandaran during Bronze Age”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 10(1): 57-74. https://doi:10.22059/jarcs.2018.220765.142355 (In Persian).
69. - Heydari, R., (2016). “Speculation of the Shams Tabrizi Khoi minaret enclosure”. Ermia: Document Center of the General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of West Azarbaijan Province (unpublished), (In Persian).
70. - Heydari, R. & Afifi, R., (2008). “Archaeological Survey of Khoi County, Volumes I to III”. Ermia: Documents Center of the General Directorate of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of West Azarbaijan Province (unpublished), (In Persian).
71. - Ibn Hawql, M., (1966). Surah Al-Ard. Translate by: Jafar Shear. vol 2. Tehran: Amirkabir. [in Persian].
72. - Ibn Khordadbeh, A., (1992). Masalak al-Malak. Translate by: Saeed Khakrand. Tehran: Miras Melal. [in Persian].
73. - Istakhri, A. I. I .b. M. F., (1964). Masalak al-Mamalak. By: Iraj Afshar. Tehran: scientific and cultural. [in Persian].
74. - Jobs, G., (2000). Symbols -Book One, Janoran. Tehran: Zayedeh Publications (In Persian).
75. - Kargar, B., (2004). “Qalaichi: Zirto Center of Mana Layer IB, 1378-1381”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Archeology of Iran: Northwest Area, Masoud Azarnoosh's effort, Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization (Research), Archaeological Research Institute: 249- 225 (In Persian).
76. - Kayani, M. Y. & Karimi, F., (1985). “Pottery Art of the Islamic Period of Iran”.Tehran: Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran Archeology Center (In Persian).
77. - Khodadoost, J.; Mousavi Haji, S. R.; Taghavi, A. & Pooraliyari, S., (2017). “An Analytical Study of the Pottery at the Malin Site (Bakharz)”. Pazhoheshha-ye Bastan shenasi Iran, 7(13): 157-172. https:// doi: 10.22084/nbsh.2017.6934.1289 (In Persian).
78. - Kiani, M. Y., (1379). Iranian Architecture: Islamic Period. Tehran: Samt.
79. - Kleiss, W., (1967). “Bericht Uber Zwei Erkundungsfahten in Nordwest Iran”. Archaeologische Mitteilungen Aus Iran, 2: 7-119 (In Persian).
80. - Kleiss, W., (1970). “Ausgrabungen in der Urartäischen Festung Bastam (Rusahinili) 1969”. Archäologische Mitteilungen Aus Iran, Neue Folge, 3: 7-65
81. - Kleiss, W., (1971). “Ausgrabungen in Der urarraischen Festung Bastam (Rusahinili) 1970”. Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, 3: 7-68 (In Persian).
82. - Lakpour, S., (2010). Archaeological excavations and researches of Dereshahr Valley (Simreh). Tehran: Pazineh (In Persian).
83. - Malekpour, F., (2009). “Study and analysis of settlement patterns of copper and stone until the end of the Old Bronze Age in Khoy and Selmas cities”. Master's thesis in archeology, Abhar Islamic Azad University (unpublished), (In Persian).
84. - Malekpour, F. & Gravand, A., (2015). “Speculation report on the determination of the area and privacy of Dozdaghi Khoi sit”. Urmia: Document Center of the General Directorate of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of West Azarbaijan Province (unpublished), (In Persian).
85. - Malekpour, F. & Gravand, A., (2017). “Speculation Report of Shams Tabrizi Khoi”. Urmia: Document Center of the General Directorate of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of West Azarbaijan Province (unpublished), (In Persian).
86. - Matrakčija, N. S., (2000). Saying the houses of Iraqi travel. Translated and edited, Rahim Raisnia, Tehran: Iran's Cultural Heritage Organization, (In Persian).
87. - Moghadam, A., (2011). “Looking at the Book of Khoi Tombs”. Heritage Report, 47-48: 90-89 (In Persian).
88. - Mostofi, H., (1983). Nozha al-Qulub. by: Mohammad Dabir Siyaghi. Tehran: Hadis Emrooz. [in Persian].
89. - Mukhsli, M. A., (2000). “Minarets”. in: The architecture of Iran during the Islamic period, Compiled by: Mohammad Youssef Kiani, Tehran: Samit Publications (In Persian).
90. - Quchani, A., (1987). “Bubble Ja”. Journal of Archeology and History, 2(1): 40-45 (In Persian).
91. - Salvini, M. P., (1960). Eiralo Zagros Elurmia. Rome Edizioni dell Aleneo (In Persian).
92. - Schnyder, R., (1968). “Saljuq pottrry in Iran”. The Memorial volume of the Vth International Congress of Iranian Art & Archaeology, Tehran-Isfehan-Shiraz, special pupbication of the Ministry of culture Arts, 102: 189-197 (In Persian).
93. - Serlo, J. E., (2009). The Culture of Symbols. Translated by: Mehrangiz Ohadi, Tehran: Dostan (In Persian).
94. - Sharifkazemi, K.; Mohamadian, F. & Mosavi Haji, S. R., (2017). “The study design style geometric motifs in medieval Islam potteries”. Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 22(4): 87-100. https://doi: 10.22059/jfava.2017.64030 (In Persian).
95. - Shatari, M., (2014). “Regionalization of Naqsh-kandeh type in Gulabeh in Iran (a case study of East and South-East region)”. Second National Conference of Iranian Archeology, 1-20 (In Persian).
96. - Tehrani Moghadam, J., (1934). Tarikh Qom. Tehran Press (In Persian).
97. - Touhidi, F., (2000). Pottery art and art. Tehran: Samt (In Persian).
98. - Velayati, R., (2016). Report of exploration and speculation in order to determine the area and sanctuary of the historical city of Ojan, East Azerbaijan (In Persian).
99. - Werness, H. B., (2004). The Continuum Encylopedia of Animal Symbolism in Art. Continuum, London-New York, Continuum (In Persian).
100. - Zarei, M. E.; Khaksar, A.; Motarjem, A.; Amini, F. & Dini, A., (2015). “Survey and Study of Ilkahanid Pottery from Archaeological Excavations in Arzanfood”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 6(2): 73-90. https://doi: 10.22059/jarcs.2015.54174 (In Persian).
101. - Zariabkhoi, A., (1987). “Administrative organization of Iran during Ilkhanate (2)”. Journal of Archeology and History, 2(1): 29-39 (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.