logo
year 5, Issue 15 (6-2021)                   Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2021, 5(15): 115-134 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Dehpahlavan M, Jahed M. (2021). Some Evidence of Counting Game in Iron Age II and III of Qara Tappeh Cemetery in Sagzabad. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 5(15), 115-134. doi:10.30699/PJAS.5.15.115
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-505-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Ph.D. Student in Archeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. , jahed.mahdi@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (5412 Views)
Abstract
In determining the boundaries of Qara Tappeh Sagzabad and Tappeh Qabristan in July 2016, evidence of a cemetery in the east of Qara Tappeh and southwest of Tappeh Qabristan belonging they revealed to the Iron Age 2 and 3 under sedimentary layers. In the 2018 and 2019 seasons of excavations, we got valuable findings in trenches 13 and 12 on the site. Among these findings are two tablet-like objects, one of these two objects, made of stone with a rectangular shape and light gray with a length and width of 12.5 × 18 cm and a thickness of 2.8 cm with circular blind holes, The holes made in four vertical rows and nine horizontal rows to a depth of 1.4 cm on one side of the object. We found the object in Grave No. 8 of Trench 13. Another example is a broken part of a gray rectangular clay object measuring 5.1 x 5.86 cm long and 2.81 cm thick with six circular blind holes 2.2 cm deep. We excavated this object from Trench 12. The two objects in question are comparable to the specimens found from Kul-Tarikeh, Haftavan Tappeh, and specimens unearthed from the neighbors of the Uzbeki archaeological site and the Sialk cemetery in the first millennium BC. This article examines these objects in terms of morphology and compares them with other similar findings, and it is likely that these findings, based on other examples and examples from older periods, are a kind of tablet for counting games; First by placing the findings in the archaeological context and comparative comparison with contemporaneous sites and then measuring the results with earlier examples of these findings in other archaeological sites, a preliminary proposal to use a counting game or board game for objects provided.
Keywords: Iron Age, Sagzabad, Qara Tappeh, Numerical Tablet, Boardgame.

Introduction
Since the first archaeological excavations in West Asia to the present day, thousands of types of objects have been discovered from archaeological sites, and researchers have proposed various approaches for the functional interpretation of each object. Among these approaches has been a comparative comparison of the findings with other similar findings and an understanding of the functional concept of the object in the archaeological context. Examples of objects found over a long period from the Late Neolithic period to the Achaemenid period and later in various areas from Egypt to Central Asia have been called game boards. In the excavations of the 2018 and 2019 years seasons in the Qara Tappeh of Sagzabad, similar findings were obtained with these samples. Initially, the findings were assumed to be a common type of board game in ancient West Asian cultures. Further study in this field revealed that unfortunately, no correct definition of the board has been provided in the archaeological literature of West Asia and different these forms from the Neolithic period to the first Islamic century (7th century AD) in this region known or registered. Therefore, the samples were compared with objects called board games, and a suggestion was made to use them. Thus, first, the desired findings and the texture of the place of their discovery are described, and then a brief review of the type of cultural materials called game boards done, and finally, the desired materials analyzed and we make comparative conclusions. Based on this, these findings can be near-certainty examples with the use of counting games. The two morphological objects found in the Qara Tappeh excavations can be like the examples from the findings of the West Asian sites, which are known as game boards in the archeological cultures of the region. For this issue, the two fundamental questions of this research will be in the following order.
1- What is the use of the previous samples in terms of morphology that are like the findings of Qara Tappeh Seghzabad?
2- What kind of Function can the two objects found in Qara Tappeh Sagzabad represent?

Identified Traces
Qara Tappeh is one of the key sites of the Iron Age in the center of the Iranian plateau. Two special findings have been obtained, which are like ancient game boards. The relative and absolute chronology show that these two objects belong to the first millennium BC. Game boards are among the archaeological finds found in large geographical and cultural areas of West Asia and North Africa and the Indian subcontinent, simultaneously with the Neolithic, Chalcolithic, Bronze Age, and the Mesopotamian Dynasty, Egypt up to the Achaemenid period, Perhaps the oldest examples of this are, for example, what introduced by Hole (1977: 215) from the Neolithic site of Choghasefid and Kirkbride (1966: 34) of Beidha and Rollefson (1977) of the Ain Al Ghazal. Various other types of game boards with The Game of 20 Square, The Game of 58 Holes, Senet, Mehen, Mankala, Nine men’s morris, Backgammon, and Chess have been introduced from ancient cultures. With certainty, examples of Qara Tappeh can be one game of 58 holes. This game Rule is less well known, but the overall morphology of the game shows that this board Has been a kind of racing game, pieces like pins could be inserted into the holes of the board and move along a certain path according to the number of dice poured, the name of the game is a description of the appearance of the game but always the number of holes on the board Not equal, it thought that this game invented in Egypt during the ninth to twelfth dynasties (2100 BC) and has been widespread in Egypt since the late third millennium BC. Has found. This game was common during the second millennium BC of Mesopotamia and among its close neighbors. Archaeologists have not found examples of this game in various areas of the region after the 6th century BC. (de voogt et al., 2013: 1718-1719). The samples found from Qara Tappeh can be considered as a type of game of 58-hole based on the morphological comparison.

Conclusion
What is found in the trench of 13 Qara Tappeh with 36 blind holes and a passing hole in the highest part of the tablet can be among the types that are known as the game with 58 holes, the closest example in terms of the number of holes on the find, sample Is introduced in the surface survey of the Kul Tarikeh. Another example that is similar in shape to the two aforementioned examples is the example introduced from the Haftavan. This finding, however, unlike the two aforementioned findings, has 3 horizontal rows and 8 vertical rows. If we accept that the tablet found in Trench 13 is a kind of board game, we must say that there are no special rules for the type of use. On the other hand, the presence of an all-round hole in the upper part of the find can indicate that the tablet could hang from somewhere. Finally, according to the relative comparisons, the object found in Trench 12 can be considered as a broken piece of a game 58-holes. But in the case of Trench 13, this must be considered more carefully. Only according to the appearance of the object can be considered as a preliminary use of the game of 58-holes for it.
Full-Text [PDF 2059 kb]   (1307 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2021/01/17 | Accepted: 2021/02/23 | Published: 2021/04/30

References
1. - ده‌پهلوان، مصطفی؛ جاهد، مهدی؛ تازیک، عمار؛ محمد‌خانی، کوروش؛ و فرنام، الهام، (1398). «کارگاه 13، گورستان نویافتۀ عصرآهن 2 و 3 قره‌تپه سگزآباد». مجموعه مقالات همایش بین‌المللی عصرآهن در غرب ایران و مناطق همجوار. ج 1. به‌کوشش: یوسف حسن‌زاده، علی‌اکبر وحدتی و زاهد کریمی، تهران و سنندج: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری ادارۀ کل استان کردستان، موزۀ ملی ایران.
2. - ده‌پهلوان، مصطفی، (1398). «گزارش کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی قره‌تپۀ سگز‌آباد». تهران: مؤسسۀ باستان‌شناسی دانشگاه تهران (منتشر‌نشده).
3. - مجیدزاده، یوسف، (1382). جیرفت کهن‌ترین تمدن شرق. تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و انتشارات اسلامی.
4. - مجیدزاده، یوسف، (1389الف). کاوش‌های محوطۀ باستانی ازبکی. جلد دوم: سفال، تهران: اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری.
5. - مجیدزاده، یوسف، (1389). کاوش‌های محوطۀ باستانی ازبکی. جلد اول: هنر و معماری، تهران: اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری.
6. - مجیدزاده، یوسف، (1399). باستان‌شناسی حوزۀ هلیل‌رود جیرفت. جلد اول: هنر معماری، (کنارصندل جنوبی)، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری.
8. - Albright, W, F., (1938). “The Excavation of Tell Beit Mirsim”. In: Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research 17(2), American Schools of Oriental Research, New Haven.
9. - Alden, J., R., (1982). “Trade and Politics in Proto-Elamite Iran”. Current Anthropology, No. 23, (6). Pp: 613-640.
10. - Amiet, P., (1976). Les Antiquités du Luristan. De Boccard, Paris.
11. - Azarpay, G., (1981). Sogdian Painating, (The Pictorial Epic in Oriental Art). University of California Press.
12. - Banks, E, J., (1912). Bismaya or The Lost City of Adab. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York and London.
13. - Becker, A., (1993). Uruk. Kleinfunde I, Stein, May Philip von Zabern, Mainz Am Rhein.
14. - Bittel, K., (1937). Bogazkoy, die kleinfunde der grabungen, 1906-1912. Wissenschaftliche Veroffentlichung der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft, Heft 60. J. C. Hinrichs, Leipzig.
15. - Burney, Ch., (1975). “Excavations at Haftavan Tepe 1973: Fourth Preliminary Report”. IRAN, No. 13 (1), Pp: 149-164.
16. - Carnarvon, E. & Carter, H., (1912). Five Years’ Explorations at Thebes: a Record of Work Done 1907-1911. London, Frowde.
17. - Carter, H., (1933). The Tomb of Tut-ankh-Amen. vol. III, Cassel and Co., London.
18. - Crist, W. & Vaturi, A., (2014). “Board Games in Antiquity”. In: Selin H. (eds) Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer, Dordrecht, Pp: 1-10.
19. - Croft, W., (2017). “Evolutionary Complexity of Social Cognition, Semasiographic Systems, and Language”. In: Salikoko S. Mufwene, Christophe Coupé, François Pellegrino (eds.), Complexity in Language Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives, London, Cambridge University Press, Pp: 101-105.
20. - Curtis, J. & Finkel, I., (1999). “Game Boards and Other Incised Graffiti at Persepolis”. IRAN, No. 37(1), Pp: 45-48.
21. - Daressy, G., (1902). “Fouilles de la Vallée des Rois”. In: Catalogue général des antiquités égyptiennes du Musée du Caire, Tome III. Institut français d’archéologie orientale, Caire.
22. - Daryaee, T., (2002). “Mind, Body, and Cosmos: Chess and Backgammon in Ancient Persia”. Iranian Studies, No. 35(4), Pp: 281-312.
23. - Delougaz, P. & Kantor, H. J., (1996). Chogha Mish. Vol. 1: The First Five Seasons of Excavations 1961-1971, Chicago: Oriental Institute Publications.
24. - de Mecquenem, R., (1905). “Offrandes de fondation du Temple de Chouchinak”. In: Morgan, J. de (Ed.), MDP, No. 7, Paris, Pp: 61-130.
25. - de Mecquenem, R., (1943). “Fouilles de Suse 1933-1938 (Suse, Tepe Bouhallan, Tepe Husseinabad,Tepe Zohab)”. MDP, No. 29, Paris, Pp: 3-161.
26. - de Voogt, A.; Dunn-Vaturi, A, E. & Eerkens, J, W., (2013). “Cultural transmission in the ancient Near East: twenty squares and fifty-eight holes”. Journal of Archaeological Science, No. 40 (4), Pp: 1715-1730.
27. - Dikaios, P., (1969). Enkomi Excavations 1948-1958. Philipp von Zabern, Mainz Am Rhein, Frankfurt am Main.
28. - Englund, R., (1998). “Texts from the Late Uruk Period”. In: Mesopotamien: Späturuk-Zeit und Frühdynastische Zeit, Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 160/1, edited by Joseph Bauer, Robert Englund and Manfred Krebernik Freiburg, Switzerland: Universitätsverlag Freiburg Schweiz, Pp: 15-233.
29. - Emery, W, B.; Smith, H., S. & Millard, A., (1979). The Fortress of Buhen: the Archaeological Report. Egypt Exploration Society, London.
30. - Fazeli, H.; Coningham, R. A. E.; Young, R. L.; Gillmore, G. K.; Maghsoudi, M. & Raza, H., (2007). “Socio-economic transformations in the Tehran Plain: final season of settlement survey and excavations at Tepe Pardis”. Iran, No. 45(1), Pp: 267-285.‌
31. - Finkel, I. L., (2007). “On the rules for the Royal Game of Ur”. In: Ancient Board Games in Perspective: Proceedings of the Colloquium on Board Games of the Ancient World, ed. I. Finkel, London: British Museum Publications, Pp:16-32.
32. - Finkel, I. L., (2008). “Board-games”. In: Beyond Babylon, Aruz, J., Benzel, K., Evans, J. (Eds.), Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, Pp: 151-155.
33. - Finkel, I. L., (2005), Games. The Trustees of the British Museum, London.
34. - Firth, C, M., (1927). The Archaeological Survey of Nubia Report for 1910-1911. Cairo, Government Press.
35. - Fugmann, E., (1958). Hama. Fouilles et recherches de la Fondation Carlsberg 1931-1938, II. Vol. 1. National-museets Skrifter, Copenhagen.
36. - Gadd, C. J., (1934). “An Egyptian game in Assyria”. IRAQ, No. I, Pp: 45-50.
37. - Gadd, C. J., (1936). The Stones of Assyria: the surviving remains of Assyrian sculpture, their recovery, and their original positions. Chatto and Windus, London.
38. - Ghirshman, R., (1938). Fouilles de Sialk, I. P. Geuthner, Paris.
39. - Ghirshman, R., (1939). Fouilles de Sialk, II. P. Geuthner, Paris.
40. - Goff, C., (1976). “Excavations at Bābā Jān: The Bronze Age Occupation”. IRAN, No. 14, Pp: 19-40.
41. - Grant, E., (1934). Rumeileh III. Biblical and Kindred Studies 5. Haverford.
42. - Harrak, A., (1987). “Another specimen of an Assyrian game”. Archiv für Orientforschung, No. 34, Pp: 56-57.
43. - Hayes, W. C., (1935). “The Tomb of Nefer-khewet and his family”. Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, No. 30 (2), Pp: 17-36.
44. - Hayes, W, C., (1978). The Scepter of Egypt: A Background for the Study of the Egyptian Antiquities in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Vol. 2, The Hyksos Period and the New Kingdom (1675–1080 B.C.). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Newyork.
45. - Heinrich, E., (1931). Fara: Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen der deutschen Orientgesellschaft in Fara un Abu Hatab 1902/03. Berlin.
46. - Hill, H. D.; Jacobsen, T. & Delougaz, P., (1990). Old Babylonian Public Buildings in the Diyala Region. Oriental Institute Publications 98, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
47. - Hole, F., (1977). Studies in the Archeological History of the Deh Luran Plain the Excavation of Chogha Sefid. Michigan, ANN ARBOR.
48. - Hoerth, A, J., (1961). “Gameboards in the Ancient Near East”. MA dissertation, Department of Oriental Languages and Civilizations, University of Chicago.
49. - Jasim, S. A. & Oates, J., (1986). “Early tokens and tablets in Mesopotamia: New information from Tell Abada and Tell Brak”. World Archaeology, No. 17 (3), Pp: 348-362.
50. - Kainlis, A. de., (1942). “Un jeu assyrien du Musée du Louvre”. Revue d’assyriologie, No. 39, Pp: 19-34.
51. - Klengel-Brandt, E., (1980). “Spielbretter und Würfel aus Assur”. Alt-Orientalische Forschungen, No. 7, Pp: 119-126.
52. - Kendall, T., (2007). “Mehen, The Ancient Egyptian Game of the Serpent”. In: Ancient Board Games in Perspective: Proceedings of the Colloquium on Board Games of the Ancient World, ed. I. Finkel, London: British Museum Publications, Pp: 33-45.
53. - Kendall, T., (1991). “Les plus anciens jeux de table”. In: May, R. (Ed.), Jouer dans l’Antiquité, Catalogue d’Exposition, Musée d’Archéologie Méditerranéenne. Ré:union: des Musées Nationaux, Paris.
54. - Kirkbride, D., (1966). “Five Seasons at the Pre-Pottery Neolithic Village of Beidha In Jordan”. Palestine Exploration Quarterly, No. 98 (1), Pp: 8-72.
55. - Kleiss, W., (1979). Bastam I, Ausgrabungen In Den Urartäischen Anlagen 1972-1975. Gebr. Mann Verlag, Berlin.
56. - Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., (1970). Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967-1969. Progress Report I. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Printed By Harvard University Printing Office.
57. - Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., (1988). “The 'Intercultural Style' Carved Vessels”. Iranica Antiqua, No. 23, Pp: 45-95.
58. - Le Brun, A. & Vallat, F., (1978). “L'origine de l'écriture à Suse”. Cahiers de la Délégation Archéologique Française en Iran, No. 8, Pp: 11-52.
59. - Loud, G., (1939). The Megiddo Ivories. Oriental Institute Publications, Vol. 52. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
60. - Macalister, R. A. S., (1912). The Excavation of Gezer. Vols. II-III, J. Murray, London.
61. - Mariette, A., (1889). Monuments divers recueillis en Egypte et en Nubie. F. Vieweg, E. Bouillon, Paris.
62. - Maspero, G., (1883). Guide du visiteur au Musee de Boulaq. Musee d'Antiquities, Boulaq.
63. - May, R., (1991). Jouer dans l’Antiquité, Catalogue d’exposition, Marseille. Musée d’Archéologie Méditerranéenne. Ré:union: des Musées Nationaux, Paris.
64. - McCown, D. E.; Haines, R. C. & Biggs, R., D., (1967). Nippur. Oriental Institute Publications 78. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
65. - Meyer, J, W., (1982). “Lebermodell oder Spielbrett”. In: Hachmann, R. (Ed.), Kamid el-Loz 1971-74, Saarbrücker zur Altertumskunde, 32, Bonn, Pp: 53-79.
66. - Meyer, J, W., (1983). “Spielbretter aus Kamid el-Loz”. In: Hachmann, R. (Ed.), Frühe Phöniker im Libanon. Philipp von Zabern, Mainz am Rhein, Pp: 101-104.
67. - Mond, R., (1904). Report on Work done in the Gebel esh-Sheikh Abd-el-Kurneh at Thebes. ASAE 5.
68. - Moortgat-Correns, U., (1959). “Ein Spielbrett vom Tell Ailun (?)”. In: von Kienle, R., Moortgat, A., Otten, H., von Schuler, E., Zaumseil, W. (Eds.), Festschrift Johannes Friedrich. Carl Winter, Heidelberg, Pp: 339-345.
69. - Munsell, (2000). Munsell Soil Color Charts Book.
70. - Murray, H. J. R., (1952). A History of Board Games Other Than Chess. Oxford Press, Oxford.
71. - Murray, A. S. A.; Smith, H. & Walters, H. B., (1900). Excavations in Cyprus. British Museum, London.
72. - Muscarella, O. W., (1974). “The Iron Age At Dinkha Tepe, Iran”. Metropolitan Museum Journal, Vol. 9, Pp: 35-90.
73. - Negahban, E., (1996). Marlik: The Complete Excavation Report. Upenn Museum of Archaeology.
74. - Nougayrol, J., (1947). “Textes et documents figures”. Revue d’assyriologie, No. 41, Pp: 23-53.
75. - Oates, J., (2005). “Archaeology in Mesopotamia: Digging Deeper at Tell Brak”.Proceedings of the British Academy, No. 131, Pp: 1-39.
76. - Oren, E. D., (1973). The Northern Cemetery of Beth Shan. Brill, Leiden.
77. - Ozgüc, N., (1966). “Excavations at Acemhöyük”. Anatolia, No. 10, Pp: 9-52.
78. - Ozgüc, T., (1986). Kültepe-Kanesh II, New Researches at the Trading Center of the Ancient Near East. Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, Ankara.
79. - Parrot, A., (1958). Le palais. Mission archéologique de Mari, II. P, Geuthner, Paris.
80. - Piccione, P. A., (2007). “The Egyptian Game of Senet and the Migration of the Soul”. In: Ancient Board Games in Perspective: Proceedings of the Colloquium on Board Games of the Ancient World, ed. I. Finkel, London: British Museum Publications, 54-63.
81. - Petrie, F., (1890). Kahun, Gurob, and Hawara. K. Paul, Trench, Trübner, London.
82. - Petrie, F., (1928). Gerar. British School of Archaeology in Egypt, London.
83. - Petrie, F., (1930). Beth Pelet I. British School of Archaeology in Egypt, London.
84. - Petrie, F., (1933). Ancient Gaza III. British School of Archaeology in Egypt, London.
85. - Petrie, F. & Brunton, G., (1924). Sedment. Band 1. London.
86. - Piccione, P. A., (1990). “The Historical Development of the Game of Senet and Its Significance for Egyptian Religion”. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago.
87. - Piperno, M. & Salvatori, S., (1983). “Recent results and new perspectives from the research at the graveyard of Shahr-I Sokhta, Sistan”. IRAN, Annali 43, Pp: 172-191.
88. - Quibell, J. E., (1909). Excavations at Saqqara. (1907-1908). Institut français d’archéologie orientale, Le Caire.
89. - Rezvani, H. & Roustaei, K., (2007). “A Preliminary Report on Two Seasons of Excavations at Kul Tarike Cemetery, Kurdestan, Iran”. Iranica Antiqua, No. 42, Pp: 139-184.
90. - Riis, P. J., (1948). Hama, Fouilles et recherches de la Fondation Carlsberg 1931-1938: 2, 3. National-museets Skrifter, Copenhagen.
91. - Rollefson, G., (1992). “A Neolithic Game Board from ʿAin Ghazal, Jordan”. Bulletin of the ASOR, No. 286, Pp: 27-47.
92. - Rothöhler, B., (1996). “Ägyptische Brettspiele außer Senet”. M.A. Philosophische Fakultät I der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg.
93. - Schmandt-Besserat, D., (1974). “The use of clay before pottery in the Zagros”. Expedition, No. 16 (2), Pp: 11-17.
94. - Schmandt-Besserat, D., (1981). “From Tokens to Tablets: A Re-evaluation of the So-called Numerical Tablets”. Visible Language, No. 15 (4), Pp: 321-344.
95. - Schmandt-Besserat, D., (1992). “The Origin of Visible Language”. In: Wind J., Chiarelli B., Bichakjian B., Nocentini A., Jonker A. (eds) Language Origin: A Multidisciplinary Approach. NATO ASI Series (Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences) 61. Springer, Dordrecht.
96. - Sebbane, M., (2001). “Board Games from Canaan in the Early and Intermediate Bronze Ages and the Origin of the Egyptian Senet Game”. Tel Aviv, No. 28 (2), Pp: 213-230.
97. - Starr, R. F. S., (1937). Nuzi II. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
98. - Swiny, S., (1986). “The Kent State University Expedition to Episkopi Phaneromeni 2”. Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, No. 74 (2), Nicosia.
99. - Van Buren, E. D., (1937). “A gaming-board from Tell Halaf”. IRAQ, No. 4, Pp: 11-15.
100. - Von Oppenheim, M. F., (1962). Tell Halaf IV. Die Kleinfunde aus Historischer Zeit, Berlin.
101. - Watson, P. J., (1979). Archaeological Ethnography in Western Iran. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press.
102. - Wetzel, E. Sh. & Mallwitz, A., (1957). Das Babylon der Spätzeit. Verlag Gebr, Mann, Berlin.
103. - Weiss, H. & Young Jr., T.C., (1975). “The Merchants of Susa. Godin V and Plateau Lowland Relations in the late Fourth Millennium B.C.”. IRAN, No. 13, Pp: 1–17.
104. - Woods, C., (2010). “The Earliest Mesopotamian Writing”. In: C. Woods (ed.), Visible Language, Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond, Chicago, IL, Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Pp: 33–50.
105. - Woolley, C. L., (1933). “Excavations at Ur”. University of Pennsylvania Museum Journal, No. 23 (3), Pp:193-248.
106. - Woolley, C. L., (1934). Ur Excavations. vol. 2, The Royal Cemetery, New York.
107. - Yadin, Y.; Aharoni, Y. R. A.; Trude, D., Immanuel, D. & Jean, P., (1960). Hazor II .Magnes Press, Jerusalem.
108. - https://www.britishmuseum.org/
109. - http://warfare.ga/

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.