logo
year 7, Issue 23 (5-2023)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2023, 7(23): 131-159 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pashazadeh P, Rezalou R, Alizadeh H. (2023). The Iron Age Sites on the Western Hillsides of Savalan Mountain Bases on the Study of the Migration Routes of the Shahsevan Tribes. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 7(23), 131-159. doi:10.30699/PJAS.7.23.131
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-498-en.html
1- PhD in Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Miyaneh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Miyaneh, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran , r_rezaloo@uma.ac.ir
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, Miyaneh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Miyaneh, Iran
Abstract:   (2603 Views)
Abstract
From the end of the Late Bronze Age and the beginning of the Iron Age, the eastern regions of northwestern Iran were involved in a series of large-scale ethnic migrations, the scope of which had previously extended to the Caucasus. Crossings in the Caucasus Mountains led these migrations to the Meshginshahr and Ardabil plains and the high and green areas of Savalan Mountain. Undoubtedly, nomadic immigrants, during several centuries of migration along the routes, had found a series of low-risk and easy-to-reach routes in which they traveled constantly. The constant traffic along this route has left countless cemeteries along with it. Today, the Shahsevan tribes of Ardabil province inherit some of these ancient routes and use them regularly. The adaptation of the routes of the Shahsevan tribes to the linear distribution of the Iron age sites on them, proves such a hypothesis. In the present study, which has been carried out by field studies with an ethnographic approach in the western parts of Meshginshahr plain and the western and northwestern slopes of Savalan Mountain, why and how to conformity of the ancient routes of the nomadic tribes of the Iron Age with the Shasevan tribe routes have been discussed. Extent of Iron Age sites located in the route of Shahsevan tribes, how the sites are distributed in the summer places of the western slopes of Savalan and determining the most important and main ancient migration routes based on the distribution of the sites and their extent is another issue that has been addressed in this research. The results of reviewing and analyzing the available data show the complete compliance of the Iron Age sites with the longitudinal line of the migration routes of Shahsevan nomadic tribes. Most of the identified sites along the routes are of the cemetery type, which are much larger in summer areas than other places.
Keywords: The Western Basin of Meshginshahr, Iron Age, Ethniarchaeology, Iron Age Migration Routes, Shahvevan Tribes.

Introduction
According to the studies in the northeastern half of northwestern Iran, ethnic migration to the plains of Meshginshahr and Ardabil intensified from about the beginning to the second half of the second millennium B.C, shortly before the beginning of the Iron Age; The existence of large central castles and small satellites, as well as the numerous cemeteries that exist in this area, most of which are unrelated to the settlements, is a reason for this. It is not clear what the reasons for these sudden and mass migrations and the human factors or geographical conditions involved were, but what is clear from archaeological evidence is the existence of a north-south migration line from the Caucasus towards the southern parts of Moghan plain, Meshginshahr plain and the northern parts of Ardabil plain. In the Meshginshahr plain, the areas around the foothills of Savalan have received so much attention that many of these nomadic tribes migrated to these areas and many others for whom sufficient resources were not available went to the Sarab, Mehraban areas. And the eastern regions of East Azerbaijan province, as well as the northern regions, have moved rapidly. In addition to archaeological studies, one of the best methods for identifying and studying the routes used by the Iron Age migratory tribes in the Meshginshahr plain is study the routes that use present or in a few centuries. In this plain of Shahsevan tribes, a clear example today is the same immigrant tribes that passed through this area several thousand years ago; Some of them have chosen temporary accommodation and others have been forced to migrate to better places. The Shahsevan are one of the most important nomadic tribes in Iran who have preserved many of their ancient traditions. These nomadic tribes are a living example of a dead tissue, tribes that in today’s machine world, like their ancestors, have maintained their nomadic way of life; In the cold season, they descend from the green slopes of Savalan and live in local winters or in their villages, and again in the summer season, they start moving towards the summer. The adaptation of the modern routes of these tribes to the distribution of Iron Age sites is an important point; That is, the Shahsevan use the same ancient tribes in most cases. Of course, there may be small changes in the path, which may be due to inevitable geographical and human factors.

Discussion 
So far, there has been no research on the origin of the ancient roads of Savalan Mountain or their distribution. The present study was carried out by conducting an extensive field study in the western basin of Meshginshahr plain, northwestern, western and northward slopes of Savalan Mountain. The area in which the field survey was conducted covers an area of 980 square kilometers. According to the studies conducted in the present study and field visits to all modern settlements that have been studied in the area, there were 5 main roads for the migration of Shahsevan nomads in this area. Although these routes are no longer used and transportation is done by vehicles, the traces of all these routes and even their old titles have been preserved. According to indigenous peoples, herds of cows, goats, and sheep passed through and around the villages, along with camels carrying the necessities of life. The first route starts from the border area between Meshginshahr and Ahar and the confluence of Qarasu with Ahar Chay, and the other routes located differently in the eastern regions, respectively. Among these routes, the longest route is way No. 4. It should be noted that in all these roads, the nomads, after entering the wide bed of Qarasu river, migrated there and after resting and watering the cattle, they moved to the foothills of Savalan; These routes are selected in such a way that they cross several important rivers and in some of them they rested temporarily, such as Qarasu, Khiavchai, Meshginchai, Habashichay and Aharchay. The nomads crossed at least two or three of these rivers in each of these five routes. In general, 207 ancient sites were recorded along these 5 main roads that lead the Shahsevan nomads to the slopes of Savalan, which indicates that these routes were also used by the nomadic tribes of the Iron Age. The number of 181 sites (87%) are the cemetery types, which, are unrelated to the settlement sites and clearly belong to the Iron Age nomadic tribes. Almost half of the cemeteries are located in the slopes of Savalan, in the present summer tents of the Shahsevan tribes. Other registered sites are the central and satellite castles and settlement sites, all of which without exception were in the plains and along the route, and no traces of this type of sites were seen on the slopes. About 31% of the sites have an extent between 1 and 2 hectares. 25% of them have an extent in about 0.5 to 1 hectare and about 21% of the sites have an extent in about 2 to 4 hectares. 

Conclusion
Undoubtedly, the establishment of a route as an easy access route for migration has taken place over several centuries and millennia. The routes that were constantly traveled and based on experience, their quality have been tested for a long time and the most appropriate ones have been selected in terms of life and financial security. Looking at the general map of all the routes and the distribution of the Iron Age sites, the location of these sites on the route of these roads is quite evident. As you advance from the paths to the sides, the number of the sites decreases. This way of distribution of the sites shows that the sites are in a longitudinal line, and this longitudinal line is the route of modern and ancient roads. Examining the roads of this field contains other points. In all the routes, as much as possible, moving inside the valleys and next to the cliffs and slopes has been avoided. Only in the cases where they had to enter the river bed to rest and water the cattle, longitudinal movement along the path and inside the river bed was avoided, and entering the river bed only vertically have taken place to pass through. In all the routes, until reaching the low and steep slopes of Savalan, continuous movement has been made on the level of the plain and areas that have a full view of the surrounding environment. It seems that this was done to ward off possible natural, animal and human dangers. In general, the following can be obtained from the present study: Today’s routes are in line with the distribution of Iron Age sites; Most of the Iron Age sites located in the path and summer places of Savalan slopes are of the cemetery type; The located in the summer area and between them are more extensive; Many routes are interconnected and it was possible to change the route in all of them easily; Towards higher slopes, the number of ancient sites has been significantly reduced; Both along the route and in the summer places, the density of areas near and where water sources are much higher; In summer places, concentrated cemeteries or the accumulation of large graves in a small area, is rarely seen and many cemeteries, despite their large area, have low grave densities. The graves are scattered at a distance from the summers and their distance.
Full-Text [PDF 1941 kb]   (755 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2021/01/5 | Accepted: 2021/06/11 | Published: 2023/05/22

References
1. - آیرملو، یحیی، (1397). «تجزیه و تحلیل فضایی-آماری الگوهای استقراری محوطه‌های پیش‌ازتاریخی حوضۀ رود مشگین‌چای براساس بررسی باستان‌شناختی». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی (منتشرنشده).
2. - امان‌اللهی‌بهاروند، سکندر، (1378). کوچ‌نشینی در ایران، پژوهش درباره ایلات و عشایر. تهران: نشر آگاه.
3. - ابتهاج، ویدا، (1383). «بررسی ساختار معماری قبور مگالیتیک عصرآهن ایران: مطالعه موردی محوطۀ شهریری اردبیل». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشرنشده).
4. - پورفرج، اکبر، (1386). «بازنگری عصرآهن شمال‌غرب ایران: مطالعه موردی محوطه شهریری اردبیل و قلاع اقماری». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی پیش‌ازتاریخ، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشرنشده).
5. - حاجی‌زاده، کریم، (1393). «گزارش نهایی اولین فصل کاوش در گورستان قیزیل‌قیه مشگین‌شهر». تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ‌ باستان‌شناسی (منتشرنشده).
6. - حصاری، مرتضی؛ و علی‌یاری، احمد، (1391). «مطالعه و گونه‌شناسی قبور کلان‌سنگی و تپه‌ای (کورگان) اردبیل». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 3 (1): 130-113.
7. - خلعتبری، محمدرضا، (1383). «کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی در محوطه‌های باستان تالش و سکه و میانرود». رشت: مرکز اسناد اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی استان گیلان (منتشرنشده).
8. - رضالو، رضا، (1391). «گزارش نهایی اولین فصل کاوش گورستان خرم‌آباد مشگین‌شهر». تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ‌ باستان‌شناسی (منتشرنشده).
9. - رضالو، رضا، (1386الف). «گزارش مقدماتی اولین فصل کاوش در گورستان خانقاه گیلوان». تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی (منتشرنشده).
10. - رضالو، رضا، (1386ب). «ظهور جوامع با ساختارهای پیچیده اجتماعی و سیاسی در عصرمفرغ جدید». رسالۀ دکترای باستان‌شناسی دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشرنشده).
11. - رضالو، رضا؛ و آیرملو، یحیی، (1393). «فرهنگ عصرمفرغ جدید و آهن I دشت اردبیل: مطالعۀ موردی قلعه خسرو و قلاع اقماری». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 4 (6): 84-65.
12. - رضالو، رضا؛ و آیرملو، یحیی، (1396). «گورهای گورستان عصرآهن I گورستان گیلوان خلخال». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، 1 (2): 58-37.
13. - صباحی، طاهر، (1397). شاهسون (مروری بر دستبافته‌های عشایر شاهسون). تهران: ویژه نشر.
14. - طلایی، حسن؛ نوراللهی، علی؛ و فیروزمندی‌شیره‌جین، بهمن، (1393). «قوم‌باستان‌شناسی کوچ‌نشینی و ایل‌راه‌های غرب زاگرس مرکزی». جامعه‌شناسی تاریخی، 6 (2): 194-163.
15. - عسکرپور، وحید؛ تیرانداز‌لاله‌زاری، آرش؛ و آجرلو، بهرام، (1395). «درآمدی بر قوم‌باستان‌شناسی کوچ‌روان قره‌داغ مرکزی آذربایجان». پژوهش‌های انسان‌شناسی ایران، 6 (1): 118-101.
16. - علیزاده، عباس، (1387). شکل‌گیری حکومت عشایری و کوهستانی عیلام باستان. شهرکرد: اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی استان چهارمحال‌وبختیاری.
17. - نیکنامی، کمال‌الدین؛ و کاظم‌پور، مهدی، (1390). گزارش بررسی و کاوش محوطۀ زردخانۀ اهر. تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ‌ باستان‌شناسی (منتشرنشده).
18. - ورجاوند، پرویز، (1344). روش بررسی و شناخت کلی ایلات و عشایر. تهران: مؤسسۀ مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران.
19. - هژبری‌نوبری، علیرضا، (1383). «گزارش مقدماتی سومین فصل کاوش محوطۀ شهریری».تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی (منتشرنشده).
21. - Abdi, K., et al., (2003). “Tuwe Khoshkeh: Amiddle Chalcolithic Mobaile Pasturalist Camp-Site in the Islamabad Plain, West Central Zagros Mountains”. IRAN, XL: 43-74.
22. - Adams, R. Mc., (1974). “The Mesopotamian Social Landscape: A Viewfrom the Frontier”. in: C. Morre (Ed.). Reconstruction Complex Societies Supplement to the Bulletin of Amrican Schools of Oriental Research, 20: 1-11.
23. - Alizadeh, A., (2008). Formation of nomadic and mountainous government of ancient Elam. Chaharmahal Bakhtiari: Cultural Heritage of Chaharmahal Bakhtiari province. (In Persian).
24. - Amanolahi-Baharvand, S., (1975). “The Baharvand, former pastoralists of Iran”.Doctoral dissertation, Rice University.
25. - Amanollahi Baharond, S., (1999). Nomadism in Iran, Research on tribes and Nomads. Tehran: Aghah. (In Persian).
26. - Askarpour, V.; Tirandaz Lalehzari, A. & Ajorlou, B., (2015). “Introduction to the nomadic ethno-archaeology of Qaradagh Central Azerbaijan”. Iranian Anthropological Research, 6 (1): 101-118. (In Persian).
27. - Ayremlou, Y., (2017). “Spatial-statistical analysis of the settlement patterns of the prehistoric sites of the Meshgin-chai river basin based on archaeological survey”. Doctoral dissertation in archaeology, Ardabil: Mohaghegh Ardabili University. (Unpublished) (In Persian)
28. - Barth, F., (1961). Nomads of south Persia. Universitetets Etnografiske Museum Bulletin, No. 8. Oslo.
29. - Bates, D. G. & Lees, S. H., (1977). “The Role of Exchange in Productive Speccialization”. American Antheropologist, 79: 824- 841.
30. - Beck, L., (1978). Women among Qashqai nomadic pastoralists in Iran. Harvard University Press.
31. - Black‐Michaud, J., (1974). “An Ethnographic and ecological survey of Luristan, Western Persia: modernization in a nomadic pastoral society”. Middle Eastern Studies, 10(2): 210-228.
32. - Burney, C. A., (1979). “Meshkin Shar Survey”. IRAN, 8 (2): 1-71.
33. - Digard, J. P., (1973). “Histoire et anthropologie des sociétés nomades: le cas d'une tribu d'Iran”. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 28 (6): 121-140.
34. - Ebteahaj, V., (2013). “Investigating the architectural structure of Iranian Iron Age megalithic tombs: A case study of Shahr Yri site in Ardabil”. M.A. thesis in archaeology, Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. (Unpublished). (In Persian).
35. - Feilberg, C. G., (1952). Les papis, Nationalmuseets skrifter, etnografisk raekke. vol. IV. Nordisk Forlag.
36. - Hajizadeh, K., (2013). “Final report of the first season of excavation in Qizilqaye cemetery, Meshginshahr”. Tehran: Archeological Research Institute Document Center. (Unpublished). (In Persian).
37. - Hejabri Nobari, A., (2004). “Preliminary report of the third season of excavation in Qizilqiye cemetery, Meshginshahr”. Tehran: Archeological Research Institute Document Center. (Unpublished). (In Persian).
38. - Hessari, M. & Ali Yari, A., (2013). “Study and typology of megalithic and mound graves (Kurgan) of Ardabil”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 3 (1): 113-130. (In Persian).
39. - Hole, F., (1978). “Pastoral Nomadism in Western Iran”. in: Richard A. Gould (Ed.). Explorations in Ethno Archaeology: 127- 167, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
40. - Khalatbari, M., (2004). “Archaeological excavations in the ancient sites of Talesh, Veske and Mianrud”. Rasht: Cultural Heritage Organization of Gilan Province. (Unpublished). (In Persian).
41. - Kramer, C., (1982). Village ethnoarchaeology; rural Iran in archaeological perspective. Academic Press.
42. - Marucheck, J. T., (1976). “A Survey of Seasonal Occupation Sites in North-Eastern Baluchistan”. Proceedings of the IV the Annual Symposium on Archaeological Research in Iran, Tehran.
43. - Mortensen, I. D., (1993). Nomads of Luristan, History, Material Culture, and Pastoralism in Western Iran. London: Thames and Hudson.
44. - Porfaraj, A., (2007). “Reviewing the Iron Age of Northwest Iran: A case study of Shahr Yri site and satellite castles, Doctoral Dissertation in Prehistoric Archeology”.Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. (Unpublished) (In Persian)
45. - Pullar, J., (1990). Tepe Abdul Hosein a Neolithic Site in Western Iran. BAR International, Series 563.
46. - Rezalou, R. & Ayremlou, Y., (2013). “Late Bronze Age and Iron I Culture of Ardabil Plain: A Case Study of Qale Khosrow and satellite castles”. Archaeological Researches of Iran, 4 (6): 65-84. (In Persian).
47. - Rezalou, R., (2007a). “Preliminary report of the first season of excavation in Khangha Gilavan cemetery”. Tehran: Archeological Research Institute Document Center. (Unpublished). (In Persian).
48. - Rezalou, R., (2007b). “The Emergence of Societies with Complex Social and Political Structures in the late Bronze Age, Doctoral Dissertation in Archeology”. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. (Unpublished). (In Persian).
49. - Rezalou, R., (2011). “Final report of the first season of excavation in Qizilqiye cemetery, Meshginshahr”. Tehran: Archeological Research Institute Document Center. (Unpublished). (In Persian).
50. - Sabahi, T., (2017). “Shahsevan (A review of Shahsevan's nomadic handlooms)”.Tehran: Special Publication. (In Persian).
51. - Talai, H.; Noorollahi, A. & Firouzmandi Shirejin, B., (2013). “Ethnoarchaeology of nomadism and the tribes of western Zagros”. Historical Sociology, 6 (2): 163-194. (In Persian).
52. - Tapper, R., (1966). “Black Sheep, White Sheep and Red-Heads: A Historical Sketch of the Shāhsavan of Āzarbāijān”. IRAN, 25: 61-84.
53. - Tapper, R., (1974). “Shāhsevan in afavid Persia”. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 37(02): 321-354.
54. - Tapper, R., (1979). Pasture and Politics: Economics, Conflict, and Ritual Among Shahsevan Nomads of Northwestern Iran. University of Michigan: Academic Press.
55. - Tapper, R., (1988). “History and identity among the Shahsevan”. Iranian Studies, 21(3-4): 84-108.
56. - Tapper, R., (1997). Frontier Nomads of Iran: A Political and Social History of the Shahsevan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. - Verjavand, P., (1965). Method of sdudy and general recognition of tribes and nomads. Tehran: Institute of Social Studies and Research of University of Tehran. (In Persian)
58. - Watson, P. J., (1979). Archaeological ethnography in western Iran. Tucson: University of Arizona press.
59. - Zagarell, A., (1975). “Nomad and setteled in the Bakhtiari mountains”. Sociologus, 25: 127-38.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.