logo
year 4, Issue 11 (6-2020)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2020, 4(11): 153-167 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sattarnezhad S, Omrani B, Naseri-Someeh H, Hosseininiya S M. (2020). Study and Classification of Ritual-Religious Rock Architecture in the County of Maragheh. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 4(11), 153-167. doi:10.30699/PJAS.4.11.153
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-235-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. , saeidsattarnejad@yahoo.com
2- Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology Prehistory Period, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran.
3- Ph.D. Student of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Ph.D. Student of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
Abstract:   (5516 Views)
Abstract
One of the main types of rock monuments is hand-carved ritual-religious spaces. These handmade spaces have long been considered, sanctified and respected by religious social groups who were committed to religious practices. From this perspective, it can be stated that Maragheh region has been one of the most important, rich and long-lasting centers of ritual-religious architecture in the history and culture of Iran. In an era, in which ritual manmade spaces have lost their influence in many areas of ritual prosperity and sacred power, some ritual-religious manmade spaces in Maragheh still have an active and prominent presence. Accordingly, the present study, while identifying, introducing and explaining the special features of the ritual-religious hand-carved spaces of this region, has also addressed the formation factor of these ritual spaces; and seeks to answer the following question: to how many types are the ritual-religious hand-carved spaces in Maragheh divided? Therefore, along with the field study method applied for recording and explaining the current situation, library studies were also used to identify the factors influencing the formation of ritual-religious architecture in Maragheh. The results of the studies indicate that 8 religious-religious rock monuments have been identified in the county of Maragheh. Typologically, the above-mentioned rock architecture can be classified into surface and subsurface forms. Also, in terms of typology and classification of the application nature, these works have had different uses, such as: a) mosques, b) monasteries, c) churches, d) Buddhist temples, e) open temples, f) crypts, and h) rock graves. Many of these sites are now ruined, however, some spaces have retained their sacred position and are being used with some modifications.  
Keywords: Maragheh, Rock Architecture, Typology, Ritual-Religious Use.

Introduction
The county of Maragheh is located in the northwestern part of Iran in the province of East Azerbaijan, on the southern slopes of Sahand Mountain. According to national divisions, the county of Maragheh has two districts (central and Sarajo) and six villages. The county of Maragheh consists of two separate parts: the northern areas of the county that are mountainous and the central and southern areas which consist of plains and flatlands (Khamachi, 1991: 459). Sahand mountainous mass is one of the most important topographic features of the county, and the southern slopes of this mountain form the configuration of the main part of the county. The general slope of the land in this county is from north to south and the three rivers of Leylan Chay, Mordagh Chay, and Sufi Chay are the important rivers that supply the water needed by the region (Morvarid, 1981: 12).
In the county of Maragheh, numerous historical monuments are remained from different periods, some of which are used as ritual-religious hand-carved spaces. Ritual-religious hand-carved spaces in Maragheh, in particular and other areas in general, have long been considered, sanctified and respected by social groups, according to the existing evidence; Therefore, in this paper, it has been attempted to explain the formation factor, analyze the use nature of spaces and the period in which they have been applied using the a spatial archeological approach and archeological surveys after introducing the ritual hand-carved spaces. The current research has been conducted in order to answer this fundamental question: to how many types are the ritual-religious hand-carved spaces in Maragheh divided? Moreover, the purpose of this study is to investigate and analyze the typology of the mentioned hand-carved spaces. 
Methods: The present study has been conducted using a descriptive-analytical method and data collection has been performed using library methods and field visits from a large number of hand-carved spaces in different parts of the county of Maragheh.
The Significance and Necessity of Research: The rocky and cave nature of worship places and the study limitations of the ritual-religious hand-carved spaces in Iran have caused any religious hand-carved spaces to be associated with Mithraism; however, little evidence of Mithraism has been identified in these sacred spaces. Accordingly, by conducting studies on the ritual-religious hand-carved architecture in the county of Maragheh, it is possible to provide a comprehensive classification of this type of architecture and determine the general appearance and nature of their spaces in this region. 
Research Question and Hypotheses: The current research has been conducted in order to answer this fundamental question: to how many types are the ritual-religious hand-carved spaces in the county of Maragheh divided? One of the hypotheses that can be proposed in the present study is that the ritual-religious spaces of Maragheh have been formed in two periods: the first period is related to the pre-Islamic period, which was influenced by the Urartian culture. The second period is related to the Islamic period. In the Islamic period, the greatest influence in shaping these spaces has been the influence of beliefs from eastern cultures, especially Buddhists and Christians.

Conclusion 
Hand-carved architecture is a special type of architecture that has been created by humans in order to adapt themselves to their environment. In the extensive territory of Iran, due to climatic, ritual and cultural diversity, remnants of this type of architecture can be seen in its different regions. One of the important reasons for the tendency of human beings in different schools towards the rock architecture was the ritual and religious structure of the society, which required turning to rocks and mountains. In the meantime, the ritual-religious hand-carved spaces of the county of Maragheh have been a manifestation of the spiritual life and cultural knowledge of the residents of this region. These spaces have a special place in the whole beliefs of the residents of the region; this has made the decorative elements, architecture and special location of these spaces to be different from other rock works. Following what has been discussed in the text of the paper, the results of library and field studies of hand-carved spaces have demonstrated the influence of ritual and religious structures of Maragheh society in the formation of some of these spaces. Due to the special geographical location of Maragheh region throughout history, the region has witnessed different ethnic groups and special religious beliefs. According to this view, the ritual-religious spaces of the region in the pre-Islamic ages have been created in the form of hand-carved burial spaces (crypts); and in the Islamic period, these spaces have been mostly carved into rock contexts in the form of hand-carved worship temples. 
In the mid-Islamic eras, especially during the Ilkhanid period, Maragheh was the center of various beliefs and this factor has formed the basis for the formation of ritual-religious spaces of Buddhist, Christian and Islamic followers. From this perspective, the county of Maragheh, especially on the banks of Sufi-Chay River, is one of the lively, active, and rich centers of tradition and ritual hand-carved heritage. Accordingly, most of the investigated worship spaces are concrete, objective and real manifestations of the cultural-religious continuity and spiritual life of the people of this region from the Ilkhanid period, and even today some of these places have retained their sacred and ritual status.
 
Full-Text [PDF 2341 kb]   (1414 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2019/10/27 | Accepted: 2020/02/23 | Published: 2020/06/20

References
1. - ابراهیمی، نجمه، (1393). «روش‌های تدفین در حوضۀ رود کُر از آغاز دورۀ تاریخی تا ورود اسلام». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد ایران‌شناسی، دانشگاه یزد (منتشر نشده).
2. - ابن‌بزاز، درویش‌توکل بن اسماعیل بن حاجی توکلی اردبیلی، (1377). اساس المواهب السنیه فی‌مناصب الصوفیه یا صفوت الصفا. به‌تصحیح :غ‍لام‍رض‍ا طب‍اطب‍ائ‍ی‌م‍ج‍د، تهران: زریاب.
3. - اشپولر، برتولد، (1368). تاریخ مغول در ایران. ترجمۀ محمود میرآفتاب، تهران: انتشارات علمی فرهنگی.
4. - اشرفی، مهناز، (1390). «پژوهشی در گونه‌شناسی معماری دستکند». نامۀ معماری و شهرسازی، شمارۀ 7، صص: 47-25.
5. - اصغرپورسارویی، سمیرا؛ و حاتم، غلامعلی، (1390). «بررسی تطبیقی گوردخمه‌های ماد و اورارتو». نشریه هنرهای تجسمی نقش‌مایه، سال 4، شمارۀ 8، صص: 72-65.
6. - باصفا، حسن؛ داوری، محمد‌صادق؛ و رضایی، محمد‌حسین، (1396). «بررسی و تحلیل کاربری فضاهای دستکند حاشیۀ آبگرم ورتون استان اصفهان». مجلۀ باغ نظر، سال 14، شمارۀ 52، صص: 48-37.
7. - بیانی، شیرین، (1371). دین و دولت در ایران عهد مغول. تهران: نشر دانشگاهی.
8. - جوادی، مهرداد، (1393). «صومعه گیغارد». مجموعه مقالات نخستین همایش معماری دستکند، کرمان: پژوهشکدۀ میراث‌فرهنگی.
9. - حاتم، غلامعلی، (1381). «گوردخمه‌ها در دوران ماد». فصلنامۀ هنر، شمارۀ 52، صص: 118-106.
10. - خاماچی، بهروز، (1370). جغرافیای استان آذربایجان‌شرقی. تبریز: سروش.
11. - خواندمیر، (1380). تاریخ حبیب‌السیر. جلد 3، تصحیح: محمد دبیر‌سیاقی، تهران: خیام.
12. - رازانی، مهدی؛ و حمزوی، یاسر، (1397). «ساختارشناسی ملاط‌های تاریخی در آرایه‌های معماری و اندود داخلی معبد صخره‌ای مراغه». پژوهۀ باستان‌سنجی، سال 2، شمارۀ 2، صص: 15-1.
13. - رازانی، مهدی؛ امین‌امامی، سید‌محمد؛ و باغبان، علیرضا، (1395). «طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل کاربرد معماری صخره‌ای در دامنۀ کوه آتش‌فشانی سهند در شمال‌غرب ایران». پژوهش‌های ایرانشناسی، سال 6، شمارۀ 2، صص: 60-41.
14. - رشیدالدین‌فضل‌الله، (1373). جامع‌التواریخ. جلد 2، به‌کوشش: بهمن کریمی، تهران: اقبال.
15. - زهبری، زهره؛ علیزاده، فاطمه؛ و علمداری، کوروش، (1393). «معرفی آثار صخره‌ای نویافته با کاربری تدفینی از بویراحمد». مجلۀ جلوه هنر، شمارۀ 11، صص: 65-53.
16. - ستارنژاد، سعید، (1395). «مطالعه و بررسی معماری دستکند مراغه». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه محقق‌اردبیلی (منتشرنشده).
17. - ستارنژاد، سعید؛ و پروین، صمد، (1397). «معرفی، گاه‌نگاری و تعیین عملکرد معماری صَخره‌ای پیرهاشم روستای وَرجُوی مراغه». دوفصلنامۀ علمی تخصصی باستان‌شناخت، شمارۀ 6، دورۀ 4، صص: 25-7.
18. - ستارنژاد، سعید؛ شهبازی‌شیران، حبیب؛ و معروفی‌اقدم، اسماعیل، (1397). «بررسی و تحلیل ماهیت کاربردی معماری صخره‌ای تپه رَصدخانه مراغه». پژوهش‌های ایران‌شناسی، سال 7، شمارۀ 2، صص: 74-57.
19. - ستارنژاد، سعید؛ معروفی‌اقدم اسماعیل؛ و حسنلو، مهدی، (1398). «نیایشگاه صخره‌ای روستای قشلاق مراغه معبدی بودایی-مسیحی یا مسجدی اسلامی». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، شمارۀ 7، سال 3، صص: 191-177.
20. - ستارنژاد، سعید؛ ناصری‌صومعه، حسین؛ و معروفی‌اقدم، اسماعیل، (بی‌تا). «بررسی و تحلیل ماهیت کاربری معماری دستکند اِمام‌زاده مَعصوم شهرستان مراغه». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، (منتشر ‌نشده).
21. - سرفراز، علی‌اکبر، (1355). راهنمای باستانی جزیرۀ خارک. تهران: سازمان ملی حفاظت آثار باستانی ایران.
22. - قزوینی، ذکریا بن محمد، (1373). آثار العباد اخبار البلاد. ترجمۀ میرزا‌جهانگیر قاجار، تهران: امیرکبیر.
23. - کامبخش‌فرد، سیف‌الله، (1373). «بررسی‌های باستان‌شناسی آذرشهر و مراغه، حرفی دیگر دربارۀ ساختمان چند خانقاه و مسجد». مجله میراث‌فرهنگی، شمارۀ 12، صص: 163-140.
24. - کیانی، محسن، (1369). تاریخ خانقاه در ایران. تهران: طهوری.
25. - محمدی‌فر، یعقوب؛ و همتی‌ازندریانی، اسماعیل، (1395). «مطالعه و بررسی معماری دستکند ایران». مسکن و محیط روستا، شمارۀ 156، صص: 110-97.
26. - مرادی‌نوروزی، نورالله، (1392). «تحلیل باستان‌شناختی هنر صخره‌ای الیماییان». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشر نشده).
27. - مروارید، یونس، (1360). افرازه رود. تهران: اوحدی.
28. - ملازاده، کاظم، (1383). «باستان‌شناسی و جغرافیای تاریخی مانا». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشر نشده).
29. - ناصری‌صومعه، حسین؛ پاشایی، علیرضا؛ و سعادتی، محسن، (1393). «معرفی و بررسی باستان‌شناختی گورهای گویجه‌قلعه مراغه». مجله پیام باستان‌شناس، سال 11، شمارۀ 22، صص: 46-33.
30. - ناصری‌صومعه، حسین؛ فیروزمندی‌شیره‌جینی، بهمن؛ و سعادتی، محسن، (1394). «مطالعه و بررسی باستان‌شناختی گویجه قلعه مراغه». مجلۀ مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، دورۀ 7، شمارۀ 1، صص: 165-147.
31. - هوسپیان، شاهین، (1393). «کلیساهای صخره‌ای ارمنستان». نشریۀ پیمان، سال 18، شمارۀ 67، صص: 230-205.
32. - هوشان، چائو، (1373). «بازپژوهشی نیایشگاه‌های مغاره‌ای مانویان در تورفان»، ترجمۀ احمد حب‌علی موجانی، باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، سال 8، شمارۀ 15، صص: 54-48.
33. - هیلن‌براند، رابرت، (1380). معماری اسلامی. ترجمۀ باقر آیت‌الله‌زاده شیرازی، تهران: روزنه.
35. - Ball, W., (1979). “The Imamzadeh Masum at Vardjovi: A Rock-Cut Il-khanid Complex near Maragheh”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran Berlin, NO. 12, Pp: 329-340.
36. - Berndt-Ersöz, S., (2006). Phrygian rock-cut shrines: structure, function, and cult practice. Brill.
37. - Davies, N. & Jokiniemi, E., (2008). Dictionary of architecture and building construction. Routledge.
38. - Emge, A., (1992). “Old Order in New Space: Change in the Troglodytes’ Life”. In: Cappadocia. Traditional dwellings and settlements working paper series. Center for environment design research: University of California.
39. - Higuchi, T. & Barnes, G., (1995). “Bamiyan: Buddhist cave temples in Afghanistan”. World Archaeology, 27(2), Pp: 282-302.
40. - Kleiss, W., (1969). “Bericht über zwei Erkundungsfahrten in Nordwest-Iran”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, No. 2, Pp: 7-119.
41. - Kleiss, W., (1973). “Bericht über Erkundungsfahrten in Iran im Jahre 1971”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, NO. 5, Pp: 132-242.
42. - Konyar, E., (2011). “Urartu Mezar Tipleri ve Gömü Adetleri”. (Tomb Types and Burial Traditions) In: URARTU: Doğuda Değişim-Transformation in the East, İstanbul, Pp: 206-231.
43. - Morgan, D., (2014). Medieval Persia 1040-1797. Routledge.
44. - Öztürk, F. G., (2010). “A Comparative Architectural Investigation of the Middle Byzantine Courtyard Complexes in Açıksaray–Cappadocia: Questions of Monastic and Secular Settlement”. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
45. - Scarcia, G., (1975). “The "Vihār" of Qonqor-olong Preliminary Report”. East and West, 25(1/2), pp: 99-104.
46. - Van Hulsteyn, Y., (1981). Urartian built and rock-cut tombs. Bryn Mawr College.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.