logo
year 3, Issue 7 (5-2019)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2019, 3(7): 57-76 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Razani M, Sedghi Y, Heidari Babakamal Y. (2019). Comparative Study of the Manufacturing Stone Carving Process of the Prehistoric South-East of Iran & Mashhad Harkareh Stone in the Contemporary Period. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 3(7), 57-76. doi:10.30699/PJAS.3.7.57
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-160-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Conservation of Historic-Cultural Properties, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran , m.razani@tabriziau.ac.ir
2- M. A. of Conservation of Historic-Cultural Properties, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Archeology, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (8275 Views)
Abstract
Stones are important and durable material in construction building; objects and make cultural artifact on the prehistory until now. Objects are very important between the entire artifacts that made by stone, Easy stuff catches for artist due to improve making stone object in the different region. One of the most important stone in the prehistoric of Iran that is good material for carving and applies in life was chlorite. A best attribute for decorated due to this metamorphism stone used in all of Iran history so after 5000 years, this time some workshop in Mashhad city is Functioning and must be support these for improve industrials and identity this handicraft in contemporary, Hence in this paper by Analytical and technical approach based on comparative studies to examine the species, extent , methods of making and decorating stone chlorite in ancient times (archeological areas in the South East of Iran) and contemporary (Mashhad  carving stone workshops) will be paid. The result of this research show that we need rehabilitation this industrial decoration by bankroll  of the history background of carving chlorite stone and also try to find a new technology for improve  quantity and quality  making in Kerman province and Mashhad city According to the chlorite stone sources  in contemporary. Meanwhile, Iran’s stone-cutting art with its various uses in buildings and monuments over the thousands of years of flourishing its artists have created remarkable masterpieces of various types of stone. One of the most prominent stones in the pre-history of Iran due to its functional and decorative nature and has been used for thousands of years, is the chlorite which is under the main branches of the Metamorphic rocks. In the ancient world, chlorite stones were used as fillings for necklaces, stamps, religious sculptures, burners, bowls, pots, jars and other kitchen utensils, molds for molding copper and bronze, and in some cases has been used as Pottery fillers. 
Keywords: Comparative Study, Chlorite Stone, Halil Civilization, Technology, Harkareh Mashhad.

Introduction
Generally, the most important reasons that led to the use of these stones from the prehistoric period to the present are as follows: Availability and ease of mining operations, ease of mining, ease of carving (simplicity of decorating, shaping, cutting, engraving, etc.), appropriate heat resistance (phase-shifting properties), porosity and density above is chemically neutral to acids and bases. The purpose of the present study was to identify more and better the pre-historic (Bronze Age) chlorite containers southeast of the Iranian plateau and study the methods of making the above mentioned containers Also, their comparative studies with the works and methods of making chlorite containers of Mashhad in contemporary are. The present study is an effective step in understanding the traditional methods of stone construction in Mashhad which has now fallen out of economic prosperity and production because of advanced machinery and machine mechanization and it will forget and not pass it on to future generations. It is, therefore, hoped that by further knowledge and extensive study of such arts and crafts in the past, it would be prevented from being erased in the mind of the contemporary man. In the present study, it is attempted to address two basic and important questions in the field of techno lithic works of chlorite and its comparison with contemporary lithography in Mashhad. In the first stage, it was attempted to gain a comprehensive understanding of the technology and methods of making prehistoric chlorite works from the southeastern parts of Iran. Therefore, to answer this question, have been referred to reviews of areas such as Yahya, Shahdad, Jiroft and Shahr e sokhteh sites. The second question in the present study was how to construct and methods of stone work in Mashhad. In this regard, it has been attempted to answer this question with comparative field studies existing between the methods of production and the prehistoric works of contemporary times. Considering the importance of lithography and the creation of chlorite art in prehistoric-Iranian to contemporary times and its ability to be revitalized as an art-industry, the present study together with the analysis and description of information and data from archaeological studies followed the various stages of production and decoration of chlorite stones in ancient and contemporary times as well as comparing their subtle and subtle changes in terms of construction technology and their decorative and qualitative differences over time. For this reason, it has been attempted to address the above issues by using library and field studies.

Conclusion
In an overview of today’s state of this art - industry in Iran and especially in Mashhad as the only active producer in the country it can be said that it retains some of the ancient methods that add to its authenticity. But new machinery and marketization, in contrast to its religious and antiquity in antiquity and many other issues, have led to a lack of creators’ sales and cheating in the production of poor quality works. Also, since there has been no attempt by the Cultural Heritage and Crafts Organization to revive traditional designs and not to repeat past poor quality work the industry today has been artificially depleted and its creativity has been lost in most cases, and it is not reproduced at present with the repetition of the past. Therefore, it is recommended that by investing in this industry, it should be positioned among the export basket and dynamic handicrafts of the country. Today, countries such as India, which have had significant stone-making industry in the past, have today advanced the industry by investing and encouraging craftsmen to produce handicrafts from various stones. It has become one of the country’s most important artistic exports. In the contemporary era and state of the art in the country today, the issue of identifying materials and tools used in traditional arts and examining the possibility of producing them while maintaining their authenticity is of great importance. Considering the continuity of the industry - art of lithography of soft rock, and in particular chlorite, for about 5,000 years in the country, Unfortunately, new products have had a remarkable decline in quality given the simplicity of the work and the mechanization of many of the actions. This applied industry is becoming a low-quality decorative industry. In this regard, the stone industry of Mashhad, which is today the only place and the most active center for the production and decoration of chlorite stone objects in Iran, needs serious attention because its products have undergone a severe decline in quality over the past few decades. In addition, with the loss of old masters, efficient young people have not been attracted to it. Therefore, considering the abundant resources of chlorite rock in Khorasan and Kerman province, there is potential for activating and enhancing the quality of its production in these centers by studying its artistic and industrial capabilities as well as trying to The revival of traditional designs and non-repetition of current high-quality work, as well as their up-to-date productivity and new technology can be achieved by artisans and artists.
Full-Text [PDF 1125 kb]   (2089 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2019/07/23 | Accepted: 2019/07/23 | Published: 2019/07/23

References
1. - افروند، قدیر (1385). «سهم خراسان در پیدایش رواج، تولید و تعالی هنر ایرانی اسلامی». کتاب ماه هنر شمارۀ 91 و 92. فروردین و اردیبهشت 1385. صص: 86-74.
2. - آمیه، پیر (1385). «مهرهای آرکائیک شهرسوخته». مجموعه مقالات پیش‌از‌تاریخ سیستان. به‌کوشش موریتسیو توزی. ترجمۀ رضا مهرآفرین، سیستان: پایگاه میراث فرهنگی شهرسوخته. صص: 497-470.
3. - پلندلیت، هرولدجیمز. و. ا. ای. ورنر (1382). حفاظت، نگهداری و مرمت آثار هنری و تاریخی: درمان، مرمت و بازسازی. ترجمۀ رسول وطن‌دوست، تهران: دانشگاه هنر.
4. - حاکمی، علی (1351). راهنمای نمایشگاه دشت لوت خبیص شهداد. [بی جا]: جشن فرهنگ و هنر.
5. - حاکمی، علی (1385). گزارش هشت فصل بررسی و کاوش در شهداد (دشت لوت) 1348- 1354 ش. به‌کوشش: محمود موسوی، تهران: پژوهشگاه سازمان میراث فرهنگی، پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی.
6. - حیدری، محمد (1383). «گزارش نجات بخشیف ساماندهی و مستند سازی اسپیدژ بزمان شهرستان ایرانشهر». آرشیو اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی تاستان سیستان و بلوچستان.
7. - ذکرگو، امیرحسین (1381). «تأملی بنیادین بر مطالعات تطبیقی هنر». فصلنامۀ هنر ویژه هنر و معنا. شمارۀ 54. زمستان 1381. صص: 173-163.
8. - رازانی، مهدی (1388). «بررسی‌های آرکئومتریک سنگ‌های سیاه تمدن جیرفت». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد مرمت اشیاء فرهنگی تاریخی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان (منتشرنشده).
9. - رازانی، مهدی؛ امامی، محمدامین؛ و مجیدزاده، یوسف (1388الف). «نگاهی به نو‌یافته‌های باستان‌شناختی جیرفت». دو‌فصلنامۀ تخصصی دانش مرمت و میراث فرهنگی. پیش‌شمارۀ 4. تابستان و پاییز 1388.صص: 40-29.
10. - رازانی، مهدی؛ امامی، محمدامین؛ و مجیدزاده، یوسف (1388ب). «بررسی مقدماتی روش ساخت و تزئین سنگ‌های کلریتی حوزۀ تمدنی هلیل‌رود». گردهمایی دوم گنجینه‌های فراموش‌شده هنر ایران، فرهنگستان هنر، آذرماه.
11. - رفیع‌فر، جلال‌الدین (1387). «صنایع سنگ تراشیده درکنار صندل جیرفت». گزارش مقدماتی. مجموعه مقالات نخستین همایش بین‌المللی تمدن حوزۀ هلیل، جیرفت (1383)، به‌کوشش: یوسف مجیدزاده، تهران: میراث فرهنگی کرمان.
12. - رفیع‌فر، جلال‌الدین؛ میلکی، ر و و یداله، ماسیمو (1387). «جنبه‌هایی از فناوری مته‌کاری درکنارصندل جنوبی». مجموعه مقالات نخستین همایش بین‌المللی تمدن حوزۀ هلیل، جیرفت (1383)، به‌کوشش: یوسف مجیدزاده، تهران: میراث فرهنگی کرمان.
13. - سید رضی،محمد (1377). فرهنگ خوردگی. تهران: انجمن خوردگی ایران.
14. - سیدسجادی، سیدمنصور (1383). «تپه بمپور (گزارش نخستین فصل گمانه‌زنی و کاوش زمستان 1382)»، تهران: پژوهشکده باستان‌شناسی میراث‌فرهنگی (منتشرنشده).
15. - سیدسجادی، سیدمنصور (1387). «منابع تأمین سنگ لاجورد جیرفت باتوجه به آخرین یافته‌های باستان‌شناسی در شهرسوخته». مجموعه مقالات نخستین همایش بین‌المللی تمدن حوزۀ هلیل‌رود: جیرفت (1383)، به‌کوشش: یوسف مجیدزاده، تهران: میراث فرهنگی کرمان.
16. - سیدی، مهدی (1387). گزیده تاریخ و جغرافیای شهر مشهد (از آغاز تا انقلاب اسلامی). مشهد: آستان قدس رضوی.
17. - شاملو، غلامعلی (1350). «بررسی تمدن‌های دره‌ صوغان کاوش‌های تپه‌یحیی». مجلۀ باستان‌شناسی و هنر ایران. شمارۀ 6. صص: 46-38.
18. - صدقی، یاسین (1396). «بررسی و مطالعه سنگ‌های نیمه‌قیمتی شهرسوخته (35 نمونه)، تهران: طرح تحقیقاتی پژوهشکدۀ حفاظت و مرمت آثار تاریخی (منتشرنشده).
19. - قدیری، فرشته (1383). «تحقیق در شیوه‌های فن‌شناسی آثار تاریخی ساخته شده از مواد معدنی». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد مرمت اشیاء تاریخی و فرهنگی دانشگاه هنر اصفهان.
20. - حاکمی، علی (1381). «گزارش یازدهمین فصل کاوش محوطۀ باستانی شهداد». پژوهشنامه. دفتر چهارم، سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صص: 141-181.
21. - کلاین، کرنلیس و هارلبوت، کرنلیوس. اس (1380). راهنمای کانی‌شناسی. ترجمۀ فرید مر و سروش مدبری، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
22. - گلاک، ج و گلاک، سومی هیراموتو (1355). «سنگتراشی». سیری در صنایع دستی ایران. گلاک، جی و سومی هیراموتو گلاک (سرویراستاران)، جی پنتون، کارل (کمک ویراستار)، ترجمۀ یحیی ذکاء و رضا علوی، تهران: شرکت سهامی عام بانک ملی ایران چاپخانه 25 شهریور.
23. - مجیدزاده، یوسف (1368). آغاز شهرنشینی در ایران: تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
24. - مجیدزاده، یوسف (1382). جیرفت کهن‌ترین تمدن شرق. تهران: سازمان چاپ و انتشارات و میراث فرهنگی.
25. - Benoit, A. (2004). Susa, In Persia’s Ancient Splendour, Mining, Handicraft and Archaeology. Stöllner T.; Slotta R. & Vatandoust A. (eds.), pp: (178-192), Deutsches BergbauMuseum, Bochum.
26. - Caldwell, J. R. (Ed.). (1967). Investigations at Tal-i-Iblis (Vol. 9). Illinois State Museum Society.
27. - De Cardi, B. (1968). “Excavation at Bampur, S. E. Iran: a brief report”. journal of Persian Studies. Vol: VI. British institute, London. pp: 135-150.
28. - Emami, M. A.; Razani M.; Soleimani, N. A. & Madjidzadeh, Y. (2017). “New insights into the characterization and provenance of chlorite objects from the Jiroft civilization in Iran”. J Archaeol Sci Report. No 16. pp: 194–204.
29. - Kohl, P. L. (1974). “Seeds of upheaval: production of chlorite at Tepe Yahya”. Ph.D thesis, Harvard University Kolbus.
30. - Kohl, P. L. (1977). “The world economy of west Asia in the mid third mill. B.C”. South Asian Archaeology. pp: 55-85.
31. - Kohl, P. L. (2001). “Reflections on the Production of Chlorite at Tepe Yahya: 25 Years Later”. Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967-1975–the third Millennium. C. C. L-Karlovsky: General Editor and Project Director. D. T. Potts, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. pp: 209-230.
32. - Kohl, P. L. (2004), “Chlorítgefäbe und andere steinerne Behaltnisse und íhr Austausch ím Gebíet des Iraníshen Zental-Plateaus und íenseíts davon”. In: Hersg T., Stoller & R.Slotta & A. Vatandoust. Persíens Antíke Pracht, Bochum. pp: 282-289.
33. - Kohl. P. L; Harbottle, G. & Sayree. V., (1979), “Physical and chemical analyses of soft stone vessels from southwest Asia”. Archaeometry 21, No.2. pp:31-159.
34. - Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. & Potts, D. T. (2001). Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran, 1967-1975. The third millennium. Harvard university, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
35. - Muscarella, O. W. (2001). Jiroft and "Jiroft-Aratta" A Review Article of Yousef Madjidzadeh, Jiroft: The Earliest Oriental Civilization.‌
36. - Namdar, D.; Stacey J, R. & Simpson, St J. (2009). “First results on thermally induced porosity in chlorite cooking vessels from Merv (Turkmenistan) and implications for the formation and preservation of archaeological lipid residues”. Journal of Archaeological Science, No: 36. pp: 2507-2516.
37. - Stein, A. (1937). Archaeological Reconnaissances in North-western India and south-eastern Iran. London: MacMillan.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.