year 9, Issue 31 (5-2025)
Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2025, 9(31): 173-210 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mirzaie S. (2025). Individual End in Zoroastrian Eschatology Four Panels from a Sogdian Tomb in Chang’an. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 9(31), 173-210. doi:10.61882/PJAS.1241
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-1241-en.html
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-1241-en.html
Graduate student, Asia-Africa institute/CSMC, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. , Sonia.mirzaei@gmail.com
Abstract: (1191 Views)
Abstract
In 2003, the discovery of a Sogdian tomb in the historic city of Chang’an opened a new horizon for researchers studying cultural exchanges and Zoroastrian eschatological beliefs. This tomb, belonging to Wirkak, a leader of a trade caravan, and his wife, Wiyusi, contains eleven stone panels, four of which directly depict concepts related to individual end in Zoroastrian eschatology. These panels illustrate the fate of the soul after death, providing a pictorial interpretation of Zoroastrian teachings within a Sino-Sogdian context. Despite previous studies, the details of these panels have not been comprehensively analyzed from a Zoroastrian eschatological perspective, and some existing interpretations require reassessment. Employing a text-image analysis approach, this article examines the eighth to the eleventh panels of Wirkak’s tomb and, by drawing on the Avesta and Middle Persian Zoroastrian texts, seeks to elucidate the visual representations of eschatological concepts in this artwork.
In 2003, the discovery of a Sogdian tomb in the historic city of Chang’an opened a new horizon for researchers studying cultural exchanges and Zoroastrian eschatological beliefs. This tomb, belonging to Wirkak, a leader of a trade caravan, and his wife, Wiyusi, contains eleven stone panels, four of which directly depict concepts related to individual end in Zoroastrian eschatology. These panels illustrate the fate of the soul after death, providing a pictorial interpretation of Zoroastrian teachings within a Sino-Sogdian context. Despite previous studies, the details of these panels have not been comprehensively analyzed from a Zoroastrian eschatological perspective, and some existing interpretations require reassessment. Employing a text-image analysis approach, this article examines the eighth to the eleventh panels of Wirkak’s tomb and, by drawing on the Avesta and Middle Persian Zoroastrian texts, seeks to elucidate the visual representations of eschatological concepts in this artwork.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Interdisciplinary
Received: 2025/01/26 | Accepted: 2025/03/18 | Published: 2025/05/31
Received: 2025/01/26 | Accepted: 2025/03/18 | Published: 2025/05/31
References
1. - Andrés Toledo, M. Á., (2013). “The Dog(s) of the Zoroastrian Afterlife”. In: Le sort des Gâhâs et autres études iraniennes in memoriam Jacques Duchesne-Guillemin. Leuven: Peeters: 13-25.
2. - Azarpay, G., (1981). Sogdian Painting, The Pictorial Epic in Oriental Art. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520333727
3. - Azarpay, G., (2011). “Imagery of the Sogdian Dēn”. In: Maître pour l’éternité: Florilège offert à Philippe Gignoux pour son 80e anniversaries. ed. R. Gyselen and Ch. Jullien (Studia Iranica, Cahier 43: 53-95.
4. - Bahar, M. (tr./ed.), (2011). Bundahišn. Tehran: Tus.
5. - Baumer, Ch.. (2018). History of Central Asia. Vereinigtes Königreich: Bloomsbury Publishing.
6. - Baumer, Ch. & Hare, J., (2008). Traces in the Desert: Journeys of Discovery Across Central Asia. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing.
7. - Beer, R., (2003). Tibetan Buddhist Symbols. Chicago: Serindia Publications.
8. - Berkson, C., (2000). The Life of Form in Indian Sculpture. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications.
9. - Chandra, S., (2001). Encyclopædia of Hindu Gods and Goddesses. New Delhi: Sarup & Sons.
10. - Conze, E. (tr.), (1975). Prajna Paramita Large Sutra on Perfect Wisdom. California: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520341258
11. - Dalvand, H. R. (tr./ed.), (2009). Rivāyat ī Dārāb-Hormazdyār. Tehran: Payam Bahārestān.
12. - De La Vaissière, É., (2005). “Mani en China au Vie siècle”. Journal Asiatique, 293: 375-78. https://doi.org/10.2143/JA.293.1.2002085
13. - De La Vaissière, É., (2015). “Wirkak: Manichaean, Zoroastrian, Khurramî? On Bilingualism and Syncretism in Sogdian Funerary Art”. Studies on the Inner Asian Languages, 30: 95-112.
14. - De La Vaissière, É., (2019). “The Faith of Wirkak the Dēnāwar, or Manichaeism as Seen from a Zoroastrian Point of View”. Bulletin of the Asia Institute, 29: 69-78.
15. - Dien, A. E., (2009). “The Tomb of the Sogdian Master Shi: Insights into the Life of a Sabao”. The Silk Road, 7: 42-50.
16. - Dowson, J., (1879). A Classical Dictionary of Hindu Mythology and Religion, Geography, History and Literature. London: Trübner & Co.
17. - Gignoux, Ph., (1968). “L’inscription de Kartir à Sar Mašhad”. Journal Asiatique, 387-418.
18. - Gignoux, Ph., (1984). Le livre d’Ardā Virāz. Paris.
19. - Grenet, F., (2007). “Religious Diversity among Sogdian Merchants in Sixth-Century China: Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Manichaeism, and Hinduism”. Comparative Studies of South Asia. Africa and the Middle East, 27: 463-78. https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-2007-017
20. - Grenet, F. et al., (2004). “Zoroastrian scenes on a newly discovered Sogdian tomb in Xi’an, Northern China”. Studia Iranica, 33: 273-284. https://doi.org/10.2143/SI.33.2.519255
21. - Grenet, F., (2013). “More Zoroastrian Scenes on the Wirkak (Shi Jun) Sarcophagus”. Bulletin of the Asia Institute, 27: 1-12.
22. - Griffith, R. T. H. (ed./ tr.), (1897). Rigvedā. Benares: E.J. Lazarus.
23. - Gulácsi, Zs. & BeDuhn, J., (2012[2016]). “The Religion of Wirkak and Wiyusi: The Zoroastrian Iconographic Program on a Sogdian Sarcophagus from Sixth-Century Xi’an”. Bulletin of the Asia Institute, 26: 1-32.
24. - Hintze, A., (2005 [2009]). “The Cow that Came from the Moon: The Avestan Expression māh- gaociθra-”. In: Bulletin of the Asia Institute: Iranian and Zoroastrian Studies in Honor of Prods Oktor Skjærvø, 19: 57-66.
25. - Hintze, A., (2019). “Defeating Death: Eschatology in Zoroastrianism, Judaism and Christianity”. Irano-Judaica, VII: 23-79.
26. - Huang, B., (2021). “Deciphering the Shi Jun Sarcophagus Using Sogdian Religious Beliefs, Tales, and Hymns”. Religions, 12: 8-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12121060
27. - Humbach, H., (1975). “Vayu, Śiva und der Spiritus Vivens im Ostiranischen Synkretismus”. In: Monumentum H.S. Nyberg, vol. 1 (AI 4), Teheran and Liège: 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004670990_031
28. - Humbach, H., (tr./ed.), (1991). The Gāthās of Zarathushtra and the other Old Avestan Texts. in collaboration with Josef Elfenbein and Prods O. Skjærvø, I and II, Heidelberg.
29. - Humbach, H. & Ichaporia, P. (tr./ed.), (1994). Gāthās, the heritage of Zarathushtra: a new translation of his Gāthās, Helmut Humbach and Pallan Ichaporia. Heidelberg.
30. - Humbach, H. & Ichaporia, P. (tr./ed.), (1997). Dādestān ī Dēnīg 1-35. London: University of London press.
31. - Humbach, H. & Ichaporia, P. (tr./ed.), (1998). Zamyād Yasht, Yasht 19 of the younger Avesta. Wiesbaden.
32. - Jaafari-Dehaghi, M., (1998). Dādestān ī Dēnīg 1. Indiana University, Association for the Advancement of Iranian Studies.
33. - Jaehee H. (tr.), (2020). The Sky as a Mahāyāna Symbol of Emptiness and Generous Fullness, A Study and Translation of the Gaganagañjaparipṛcchā. Volume 2: Edition and Translation. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.
34. - Kamakura-shi, (1997). “Silk Road Art and Archaeology”. Journal of the Institute of Silk Road Studies. Japan.
35. - Kellens, J. (tr.), (1974). Les noms-racines de l’Avesta. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.
36. - Lecoq, P. (tr.), (2016). Les Livres de l’Avesta, Les textes sacrés des Zoroastriens ou Mazdéens. Paris.
37. - Lerner, J. A., (2005). “Les Sogdiens en Chine-Nouvelles decouvertes historiques, archeologiques et linguistiques’ and Two Recently Discovered Sogdian Tombs in Xi’an”. BAI, 15: 151-162.
38. - Lerner, J. A., (2011). “Zoroastrian Funerary Beliefs and Practices Known from the Sino-Sogdian Tombs in China”. The Silk Road, 9: 18-25.
39. - Madan, Dh. M. (ed.), (1911). The Complete Text of the Pahlavi Dinkard (P. I, B. III-V). Bombay.
40. - Malalasekera, G. P., (2007). Dictionary of Pāli Proper Names: A-Dh. India: Motilal Banarsidass Pub.
41. - Mazdapour, K., (1999). Dāstān-i Garshāsb, Tahmūras va Jamshīd, Gulshāh va matnhā-yi dīgar: bar’rasī-i dastnivīs-i M.Ū. 2. Tehran: Agah.
42. - Mirfakhraei, M., (1985). “Dādestān ī Dēnīg, Pursishn I-XL”. Chista, 24: 245-8.
43. - Mirfakhraei, M., (1990). “The purpose of creation according to the sixth question of the Middle Persian text Dādestān ī Dēnīg”. Culture: 63-7.
44. - Mirfakhraei, M., (tr./ed.), (1992). A study Hādōxt nask. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
45. - Mirfakhraei, M., (2011). Rivāyat ī Pahlavī. ehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
46. - Morris, R., (1885). “Folk-Tales of India”. The Folk-lore Journal, 3: 242-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442524.1885.10602783
47. - Müller, Sh., (2009). “Sogdier in China um 600 n. Chr. Archäologische Zeugnisse eines Lebens zwischen Assimilation und Identitätsbewahrung”. In: Zeitschrift für Kultur und Geschichte Ost- und Südostasiens, 183/184: 177-148.
48. - Narten, J. & Gignoux, Ph., (1988). “Bahman”. In: Encyclopædia Iranica, III, Fasc. 4: 487-8.
49. - Rashed Mohasel, M. T. (tr./ed.), (1987). Wizīdagīhā ī Zādsparam. Tehran: The Institute of Cultural and Social Studies.
50. - Rashed Moḥaṣṣel, M. T. (tr./ed), (1991). Zand ī Wahman Yasn. Tehran: The Institute of Cultural and Social Studies.
51. - Rashed Moḥaṣṣel, M. T., (tr./ed.), (2010). Dēnkard (BookVII). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
52. - Rouse, W. H. D. (tr.), (1895). The Jātaka. vol. II, Cambridge University Press.
53. - Shaked, Sh., (1998). “Eschatology i. In Zoroastrianism and Zoroastrian Influence”. in: Encyclopædia Iranica, VIII, Fasc. 6: 565-9.
54. - Shaked, Sh. (tr.), (1979). The Wisdom of the Sasanian Sages (Dēnkard VI). Boulder, Colorado.
55. - Shaki, M., (1994). “Dēn”. In: Encyclopædia Iranica, VII, Fasc. 3: 279-281.
56. - Shenkar, M., (2014). Intangible Spirits and Graven Images: The Iconography of Deities in the Pre-Islamic Iranian World. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004281493
57. - Shenkar, M., (2015). “Images of Daēnā and Mithra on two Seals from the Indo-Irianian Borderlands”. Studia Iranica, 44: 99-177.
58. - Sims-Williams, N., (2021). “The Sogdian epitaph of Shi Jun and his wife”. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 84: 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X21000732
59. - Skjærvø, P. O., (2011). “Afterlife in Zoroastrianism”. Jenseitsvorstellungen im Orient. Kongreßakten der 2. Tagung der RVO, 3/4: 311-349.
60. - Sun, F., (2005). “Investigations on the Chinese version of the Sino-Sogdian bilingual inscription of the tomb Lors Shi”. Les Sogdiens en Chine: 47-56. - Tafażżolī, A., (1975). Mēnōg ī xrad. Tehran: Bonyad i Farhang i Iran.
61. - Tafażżolī, A., (1991). “Činwad Puhl”. In: Encyclopædia Iranica, V, Fasc. 6: 594-5.
62. - Tafażżolī, A. & Amouzgar, J., (tr./ed.), (2007). Dēnkard (Book V). Tehran: Moin.
63. - Wertmann, P., (2015). Sogdians in China: Archaeological and art historical analyses of tombs and texts from the 3rd to the 10th century AD. Archaeology in China and east Asia, vol. 5, Darmstadt: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.
64. - Yoshida, Y., (2005). “The Sogdian Version of the New Xi’an Inscription”. In: Les Sogdiens en Chine, Études Thématiques, 17, Sous la direction de Étienne De La Vaissière et Éric Trombert, École française d’Extême-Orient Paris: 57-72.
65. - Shi Jun’s Sarcophagus: https://sogdians.si.edu/shi-juns-sarcophagus/
66. - Shi Jun’s tomb: http://www.silkroads.org.cn/portal.php?mod=view&aid=10149
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |