logo
year 8, Issue 28 (8-2024)                   Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2024, 8(28): 61-94 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rjabiuon Z, Abbasnejad Seresti R. (2024). Some Aspects of the Social and Livelihood of Eastern Mazandaran from the 4th to the 2nd Millennium BC based on the usage of Yaqut Tepeh Pottery. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 8(28), 61-94. doi:10.22034/PJAS.8.28.61
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-1093-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student in Archaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran (Corresponding Author). , r.abbasnejad@umz.ac.ir
Abstract:   (3180 Views)
Abstract
Analyzing why and how food collecting and production has been occurred in past societies has always been one of the main archaeological and anthropological research question. This work is done using archaeological finds, especially pottery. In this research, we tried through study of Yaqut Tepeh pottery usage to understand the socio-livelihood situation of East Mazandaran from the 4th to the 2nd millennium BC. In terms of use, potteries were divided into three categories: kitchen wares, food storage containers, and daily uses containers. Various variables such as clay, construction stages, decoration and form have been considered. Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze the relationship between the mentioned variables and the relationship between the use of pottery and each of the locus consequently. The socio-economic situation is the specific question of eastern Mazandaran communities from 4th to 2nd millennium BC. Probably this event took place in the east of Mazandaran, which is the intersection point of different cultures and the gateway to the Gorgan Plain and Central Asia on the one hand, and the southern slopes of Central Alborz and the Shahrood, Damghan, and Semnan plains through the mountainous plains, has happened. There is a significant relationship between kitchen pottery and food storage containers with some locus; but this relationship is very weak on daily uses containers. In the middle of the settlement and lifetime in this site, more and more diverse pottery was produced and a certain standard and legality was observed in the production of pottery. The variety of uses of containers as a sign of increasing the diversity of the diet can be one of the reasons for the social and subsistence life of Yaqut Tepeh community to become more complicated from the third millennium BC onwards.
Keywords: Social Life and Livelihood, East of Mazandaran, Yaqut Tapepeh, 4th to 2nd Millennium BC, Pottery Usage.

Introduction
Since pottery is the most abundant and perdurable archaeological data, it is necessary and useful to study it in various dimensions and aspects. Recording, description, classification, typology, seriation, and analysis of pottery are very important. In fact, the detailed study of pottery, as well as posing questions and hypotheses, creates a strong analytical foundation for explaining cultural changes, and archaeological interpretations and explanations. If at this stage, archaeologist doesn’t succeed obtaining a relative scientific understanding of the pottery collection, the subsequent studies, including the technical and laboratory investigation methods, will not produce reliable scientific results. Therefore, understandings the function of pottery for social, economic and religious-ritual (cognitive) reconstructions are based on this stage, and basically, the laboratory study of pottery, which itself leads to the material culture knowledge, produce quantitative and technical data for confirmation and support of the mentioned reconstructions. The high abundance of pottery in ancient contexts provide the opportunity to learn about why and how this material became important and even the sanctity of this material among generations and the study of lifestyle changes, regional and extra-regional communications, the socio-economic status, beliefs, customs, rituals, symbols, and familiarity with the perceptions of the ancients the archaeologist (Shepard, 1974; Orton et al., 1993; Costin, 2007; Roux, 2019; Criado-Boado et al., 2023; Shortland & Degryse, 2019). 
From the 4th millennium BC, fundamental changes took place in the West Asia; large settlements using the irrigation-based agricultural system emerged; the level of knowledge and specialties had reached its maximum growth; innovations such as rapid pottery wheel and the production of more diverse stone tools and implements emerged; early governments tried to expand their political and economic influence in wider geographical areas; and communities in different regions were trying to participate in these social and economic developments.
The Gorgan plain and eastern Mazandaran plains played their role in the cycle of social and economic activities of the 4th millennium BC (Cleuziou, 1986; Deshayes, 1968). Pottery and its related technologies are important data that are useful to explain the aforementioned developments in this region.
The present article main aim is the studying the usage of pottery on reconstruction of the social and livelihood situation in eastern Mazandaran plains from the 4th millennium to the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC based on the unearthed pottery from Yaqut Tepeh excavation.

Discussion
In order to study the socio-livelihood situation of Yaqut Tepeh, it is necessary to determine the usage of pottery, and therefore, the technology of pottery making must be studied first. The study of pottery clay (texture and amount of temper), the stages of making pottery (external and internal surface of pottery), decoration and its relationship with the form of pottery can determine the usage of wares. In this article, the relationship between these variables has been measured using the Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Based on the results of this tests, there is a significant relationship between them. Therefore, Yaqut Tepeh pottery is divided into three categories in terms of usage, which include: kitchen wares, food storage containers, and daily uses containers. Kitchen wares have temper and has a rough texture. These potteries are resistant and shockable due to temperature change and sudden impact. Another feature of these containers is the faster heat transfer. The form of these potteries is cauldron, drainage and cauldron cap (?). Cauldrons are of several types; two colors, single color and big cauldrons. Daily uses containers are in many different forms and have more decorations.
Food storage containers are in the form of bulgy jars and open mouth jars, each of which is divided into different categories. Each of these pots had a different use. Some were used for short-term food storage and others for long-term food storage. The relative chronology of the pottery, which was done by comparing them with the pottery of the neighboring areas, shows that the oldest settlement in Yaqut Tepeh appeared in the Middle Chalcolithic; Locus 15 of trench 9 potteries are comparable to Hesar II pottery in terms of manufacturing technique, design, and form. Settlement in this site continued until the Iron Age. Yaqut Tepeh have had trans-regional connections since the beginning. The red and gray pottery of the Gorgan plain has also been seen in this site.

Conclusion
Based on the relative chronology resulting from potteries and the arrangement of locus, the settlement in Yaqut Tepeh started almost from the Middle Chalcolithic and continued until the Iron Age. Due to its location in eastern Mazandaran, it has the possibility of more communication with the Gorgan plain and the central plateau of Iran. We said before that recognition the usage of potteries plays an important role of understanding the aspects of social life and livelihood of the ancient communities. This issue has been addressed by using the technical studies and Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. 
The potteries were divided into three categories including kitchen wares, food storage containers, and daily uses containers. Pottery paste (texture and temper), manufacturing techniques, decorations and forms were the basis of this classification. All potteries with a rough and sandy texture because of their resistant to temperature changes and sudden shocks has been used for cooking. Therefore, in addition to the cauldron, there have been other wares among the kitchen wares, including drainage, open-mouthed jars, and cauldron cap. Due to the large size of food storage pots, a little temper is used in them; because temper prevents the pottery from cracking during drying. These potteries are undecorated. Pottery with daily use is very diverse and often delicate and decorated. 
The relationship between these wares and locus was measured in order to study social and livelihood developments; a relatively strong relationship has been identified between the form of kitchen wares, food storage containers and locus. But there is not much connection with food storage pots. The aforementioned tests and pottery technology have shown that certain rules and standards have been common for production of pottery in Yaqut Tepeh. The variety of pottery from the Middle Bronze Age shows the dynamism of this community. The hypothesis of the site inhabitants diet diversity also shows their social and livelihood complexities. 
The current research is an initial step recognizing and defining the concept of society from Middle Chalcolithic to Iron Age in eastern Mazandaran, where there isn’t much knowledge in this field. Naturally, a foundation has been created for future research.
Full-Text [PDF 1990 kb]   (4347 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2024/02/18 | Accepted: 2024/05/20 | Published: 2024/08/31

References
1. - امیرکلایــی، ابراهیــم، (1388). «گــزارش دومیــن فصــل کاوش محوطــۀ قلعه کــش دابودشــت شهرســتان آمــل». ســاری: ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشــگری اســتان مازنــدران (منتشرنشــده).
2. - امیرکلایی، ابراهیم، (1391). «گزارش سـومین فصل کاوش محوطۀ قلعه کش دابودشــت شهرسـتان آمل». سـاری: ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشـگری اسـتان مازندران (منتشرنشـده).
3. - برنی، چارلز؛ و لانگ، د. مارشال، (1386). تاریخ اقوام کوه‌نشین شمال‌غربی ایران. ترجمۀ هوشنگ صادقی، تهران: انتشارات نگاه.
4. - توحیدی، فائق، (1397). فن و هنر سفالگری. ناشر: سمت.
5. - چیذر، سویم، (1400). تراسیگیلاتا: تاریخ، تکنیک و کارکردهای پوشش‌های گلی. ترجمۀ فهیمه حیدری، نشر پیکره، چاپ اول.
6. - حیدری، نرجس، (1395). «بررسی الگوهای استقراری محوطه‌های پیش‌ازتاریخی استان مازندران از دورۀ پارینه‌سنگی تا عصر آهن». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی در گرایش پیش‌ازتاریخ دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر (منتشرنشــده).
7. - رجبیون، زهرا، (1393). «مطالعه الگوی استقراری فرهنگ یانیق در شرق کردستان». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد باستان‌شناسی در گرایش پیش‌ازتاریخ دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان (منتشرنشــده).
8. رجبیون، زهرا؛ بهنیا، علی؛ و ساعدموچشی، امیر، (1394). «بازسازی الگوهای استقراری فرهنگ کورا-ارس در شرق کردستان». پیام باستان‌شناس، 12 (24): 69-55. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084285.1394.12.24.4.2
9. - صفری، مجتبی، (1400). «گاهنگاری و مطالعۀ برهمکنش‌های منطقه‌ای و برون‌منطقه‌ای در جبهۀ شمالی البرز مرکزی در عصر مفرغ براساس کاوش تپه بزرود پی (قلعه‌بن) بابل در مازندران». رسالۀ دکترای باستان‌شناسی در گرایش پیش‌ازتاریخ دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر (منتشرنشــده).
10. - صفری، مجتبی؛ عباس‌نژادسرستی، رحمت؛ فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن؛ تورنتون، کریستوفر؛ و تومالسکی، یودیت، (1400). «گاه‌نگاری نسبی عصر مفرغ جبهۀ شمالی البرز مرکزی برپایۀ گونه‌شناسی سفال‌های محوطه قلعه‌بن بابل، مازندران». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، 5 (17): 57-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.5.17.27
11. - طلایی، حسن، (1387). باستان‌شناسی و هنر ایران در هزارۀ اول پ.م. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
12. - عالی، ابوالفضل، (1385). «گزارش توصیفی بررسی و شناسایی باستان‌شناختی حوضۀ آبریز ابهررود». پیام باستان‌شناس، 3 (6): 42-17. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084285.1385.3.6.2.1
13. - عباس‌نژادسرســتی، رحمــت، (1388). «گــزارش کاوش‌هــای باستان‌شناســی و گمانه‌زنی‌هــای تپه عباســی خانســر شهرســتان نــکا اســتان مازنــدران». ســاری: ادارۀ کل میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشــگری استان مازندران (منتشر نشده).
14. - عباس‌نژادسرستی، رحمت، (1399). «گزارش کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی و گمانه‌زنی‌های توق تپه شهرستان نکا استان مازندران». اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع‌دستی استان مازندران (منتشرنشده).
15. - عباسی، قربانعلی، (1390). گزارش پایانی کاوش‌های باستان‌شناختی نرگس تپه دشت گرگان. تهران: گنجینه نقش جهان.
16. - فاضلی‌نشــلی، حســن، (1397). «فصــل اول کاوش محوطــۀ قلعه بــن و شهنه پشــته شهرســتان بابــل». تهــران: مرکــز اســناد ســازمان میراث‌فرهنگی (منتشرنشــده).
17. - قاســمی‌گرجی، ســراله، (1396). «آغــاز عصر آهــن در دشــت‌های شــرقی مازنــدران (مطالعــۀ مــوردی: گوهرتپــه رســتم‌کلا)». پایان‌نامــۀ کارشناسی ارشــد باستان‌شناســی در گرایش پیش‌ازتاریخ دانشــگاه مازندران، بابلسر (منتشرنشــده).
18. - کریمی، رامین، (1394). راهنمای آسان تحلیل آماری با SPSS. تهران: نشر هنگام.
19. - ماهفروزی، علی، (۱۳۷۸). «گزارش بررسی‌های باستان‌شناسی شرق مازندران». سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان مازندران (منتشــرنشــده).
20. - ماهفروزی، علی، (1383). «سومین فصل کاوش و مطالعات باستان‌شناسی گوهرتپه رستم‌کلا». اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان مازندران (منتشرنشده).
21. - ماهفروزی، علی، (1384). «چهارمین فصل کاوش و مطالعات باستان‌شناسی گوهرتپه رستم‌کلا». اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان مازندران (منتشرنشده).
22. - ماهفروزی، علی، (1385). «پنجمین فصل کاوش و مطالعات باستان‌شناسی گوهرتپه رستم‌کلا». اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان مازندران (منتشرنشده).
23. - ماهفــروزی، علــی، (1386). «گــزارش فصــل اول گمانه‌زنــی یاقوت‌تپه رســتم‌کلا بهشــهر، مازنــدران». تهـران: مرکـز اســناد سـازمان میراث‌فرهنگی (منتشرنشـده).
24. - ماهفروزی، علی، ( 1388). «گزارش تعیین حریم تپه قلعه‌پی». مرکز اسناد سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری (منتشر نشده).
25. - ماهفــروزی، علــی، (1389). «گــزارش تعییــن حریــم تپه تــرکام». تهــران: مرکــز اســناد ســازمان میراث‌فرهنگی (منتشــرنشــده).
26. - مترجم، عباس، (1387). «بررسی و تحلیل الگوی استقراری عصر مفرغ قدیم در دشت‌های پیرامون کوهستان الوند-همدان». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی در گرایش پیش‌ازتاریخ دانشگاه تهران (منتشرنشــده).
27. - ملک‌شهمیرزادی، صادق؛ و نوکنده، جبرئیل، (1379). آق‌تپه. انتشارات سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان گلستان.
28. - موسوی‌کوهپر، سید مهدی، (1386). گزارش توصیفی بررسی‌های باستان‌شناختی به منظور تهیه نقشه اطلس باستان‌شناسی کشور. آرشیو سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع‌دستی مازندران.
29. - موســوی‌کوهپر، ســیدمهدی؛ و عباس‌نژادسرســتی، رحمــت، (1386). «گــزارش کاوش‌هــای باستان‌شــناختی در تپــه کلار کلاردشــت، فصــل اول، 1385». تهــران: مرکــز اســناد ســازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشــگری، پژوهشــکدۀ باستان‌شناســی (منتشــرنشــده).
30. نقشینه، امیرصادق، (1390). «گزارش مقدماتی فصل اول کاوش در تپه علی یورد، صائین قلعه-استان زنجان». پیام باستان‌شناس، 8 (15): 112-93. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084285.1390.8.15.6.8
32. - Aali A., (2007). “Descriptive Report of the Archaeological Survey and Identification of the Abharrud Basin”. Payam Bastanshenas, 6 (3): 17-26. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084285.1385.3.6.2.1 (In Persian).
33. - Abbasnejad Seresti, R., (2009). “Report of Archaeological Excavations of Tappeh Abbasi Khansar, Naka, Mazandaran Province”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
34. - Abbasnejad Seresti, R., (2020). “Report of Archaeological Excavations of Touq Tappeh, Naka, Mazandaran Province”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
35. - Abbasi Gh., (2011). Final Report of the Archaeological Excavation at Narges Tappeh Iran, Gorgan Plain. Tehran: Ganjineh-ye Naqsh Jahan.
36. - Amirkolaei, E., (2009). “The report of the second season excavation of Qaleh Kash Daboudasht, Amol”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
37. - Amirkolaei, E., (2012). “The report of the second season excavation of Qaleh Kash Daboudasht, Amol”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
38. - Arne T. J., (1945). “Excavations at Shah Tepe”. Iran, Publication 27, Stockholm.
39. - Burney C. A., (1961a). “Excavation at Yanik Tepe North-west Iran”. Iraq, 23 (2): 138-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4199703
40. - Burney C. A., (1961b). “Circlular buildings found at Yanik Tepe, in North-west Iran”. Antiqity, 35: 237-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/4199703
41. - Burney C. A., (1962). “Excavation at Yanik Tepe Azarbaidjan 1961”. Iraq, 24 (2): 134-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4199724
42. - Burney C. A., (1964). “Excavations at Yanik Tepe, Azerbaijan, 1962: Second Preliminary Report”. Iraq, 26 (1): 54-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4199761
43. - Burney C. A., (1972). “Excavation at Haftvan Tepe 1969, Second Preliminary Report”. Iran, 10: 127-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4300469
44. - Burney C. A., (1973). “Excavation at Haftvan Tepe 1971, Third preliminary report”. Iran, 11: 153-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4300492
45. - Burney C. A., (1974). “Report on the 1973 season of excavation at Haftvan Tepe”. in Firouz Bagherzadeh (ed.), Proceedings of the I Annual Symposium on Archaeological Reserch in Iran, 1973: 102-11. Tehran: Iraniancener for Archaeological research.
46. - Burney C. A., (1975). “Excavation at Haftvan Tepe 1973, Fourth Preliminary Report”. Iran, 13: 149-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4300531
47. - Burney C. A., (1976). “Haftvan Tappeh”. Iran, 14: 157-58.
48. - Burney C. A. & Lang M., (2007). The people of the hills: ancient Ararat and Caucasus. Translated by H. Sadeghi, Tehran: Neghah Publication, (In Persian).
49. - Çizer, I. S., (2020). Terra Sigillata: A Sintered Slip in Use since Antiquity. Translated by F. Heydari, Peykareh Publication, (In Persian).
50. - Cleuziou S., (1986). “Tureng Tepe and the Burnished Grey Ware: A Question of Frontier?”. Oriens Antiquus, 25/3 4: 221 256.
51. - Costin C. L., (2007). “Craft Production Systems”. In: Archaeology at the Millennium: a sourcebook, G. M. Feinman & T. D. Price (eds.), 273-314, Springer Science +Business Media, LLC, ISBN: 978-0-387-72610-6.
52. - Criado-Boado, F., Martínez L. M., Blanco M. J., Alonso-Pablos D., Porto Y. & del Barrio-Alvarez E., (2023). “Gazed Pottery: An Archaeometric-Cognitive Approach to Material Culture Visuality”. Journal of Archaeological Science, 154: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2023.105770
53. - Deshayes, J., (1966). “Rapport pré‌liminaire sur les troisième et quatrième campagnes de fouilles à Tureng Tepe”. Iranica Antiqua, 6: 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ethio.1965.1135
54. - Deshayes, J., (1967). “Céramiques peintes de Tureng Tepe”. Iran, 5: 123-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4299592
55. - Deshayes, J., (1968). “Tureng Tepe and the Plain of Gorgan in the Bronze Age”. Archaeologia Viva, 1: 35‐40.
56. - Deshayes, J., (1969). “New Evidence for the Indo-Europeans from Tureng Tepe, Iran”. Archae-ology, 22: 10-17.
57. - Dyson, R. H. & Remsen, W. C. S., (1989). “Observations on Architecture and Stra‌tigraphy at Tappeh Hesar”. In: R. H. Dyson and S. M. Howard (eds.), Tappeh Hesar. Reports of the Restudy Project, 1976, Florence: 69-111.
58. - Fazeli Nashli, H., (2018). The first Season Excavation Report of the Qaleh Ben and Shahne Poshte in Babol. Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization Document Center, (In Persian).
59. - Helwing, B., (2007). “The rise and fall of Bronze Age centers around the Central Iranian Desert – a comparison of Tappe Hesār II and Arismān”. AMIT, 27: 35-48.
60. - Heydari, N., (2016). “A Survey of Prehistoric Sites Settlement Pattern in Mazandaran Province from Paleolithic to the end of Iron Age”. Ph.D. Thesis in Archaeology, University of Mazandaran, (In Persian).
61. - Karimi, R., (2015). The Easy Manual of Statistical Analysis with SPSS. Tehran: Hengam Publications, (In Persian).
62. - Mason, R. & Copper L., (1999). “Grog Petrography and Early Trans-Caucasian at Godin Tepe”. Iran, 37: 25-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4299991
63. - Olson, K. G., (2020). “Models of Trade and Polity Formation in Bronze Age Northeastern Iran, CA. 3200-1600 BCE. Dissertation, in Anthropology”. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania.
64. - Orton, C., Tyers, P. & Vince A., (1993). Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 9780521445979
65. - Qasemi Gorji, S., (2017). “The begining of Iron Age in Eastern Plains of Mazandaran (Case Study: Gohar Tape, RostamKola)”. M.A. Thesis in Archaeology, University of Mazandaran, (In Persian).
66. - Mahfroozi, A., (1999). “Archaeological Survey Reports of Eastern Mazandaran”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
67. - Mahfroozi, A., (2004). “Third Season Excavation and Archaeological Studies Reports of Gohar Tappeh Rostam Kola”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
68. - Mahfroozi, A., (2005). “Fourth Season Excavation and Archaeological Studies Reports of Gohar Tappeh Rostam Kola”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
69. - Mahfroozi, A., (2006). “Fourth Season Excavation and Archaeological Studies Reports of Gohar Tappeh Rostam Kola”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
70. - Mahfroozi, A., (2007). “First Season Excavation Report of Yaghoot Tappeh Rostam Kola, Behshahr, Mazandaran”. General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Crafts and Tourism of Mazandaran Province (In Persian).
71. - Mahfroozi, A., (2009). “Proposing Frontage Excavation Report of Qaleh Pey Tappeh”. Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization Document Center, (In Persian).
72. - Mahfroozi, A., (2010).” Proposing Frontage Report of Terkam Tappeh”. Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization Document Center, (In Persian).
73. - Malek Shahmirzadi, S. & Noukandeh, J., (2000). “Aq Tappeh”. Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization of Golestan Province, (In Persian).
74. - Motarjem, A., (2008). “Archaeological Survey and Patterns of Settlement Analysis of Early Bronze Age Sites in Alvand Basin, Hamadan”. PhD. Dissertation, Department of Archaeology, University of Tehran.
75. - Mousavi Koohpar, S. M., (2007). “Descriptive Report of Archaeological Surveys in order to Prepare an Archaeological atlas map of the country”. Archives of Mazandaran Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts Organization, (In Persian).
76. - Mousavi Koohpar, S. M. & Abbasnejad Seresti, R., (2007). “First Season Report Excavation at Tappeh Kelar, Kalardasht, 2006”. Archives of Mazandaran Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts Organization, (In Persian).
77. - Naghshineh, A. S., (2011). “Preliminary Report on First Season Excavation on Ali Yourd Tepe, Sa'in Qal'eh, Zanjan”. Payam Bastanshenas, 8 (15): 91-110, (In Persian). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084285.1390.8.15.6.8
78. - Piller, C. K. & Mahfroozi, A., (2009). “First preliminary report on the joint Iranian-German excavations at Gohar Teppe, Mazandaran, Iran”. AMIT: V 2/007/22ai007.3d 1-34.
79. - Rajabioun, Z., (2014). “Studying the settlement pattern of the Yaniq culture in eastern Kurdistan”. M.A. Thesis in Archaeology, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, (In Persian).
80. - Rajabioun, Z., Behnia, A. & Saed Moucheshi, A., (2015). “An Analysis of Settlement Patterns of Kura-Araxes Culture in Eastern Kurdistan”. Payam Bastanshenas, 12 (24): 55-29, (In Persian). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084285.1394.12.24.4.2
81. - Rajabioun, Z. & Shirazi, R., (2015). “Settlement Pattern of Yanik Culture in Eastern Kurdistan (Bijar, Qorveh and Dehgolan Townships)”. International Journal of Archaeology, 3 (1): 8-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20150301.12.
82. - Roux, V., (2019). Ceramics and Society: A Technological Approach to Archaeological Assemblages. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, XXXI, 329 P., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03973-8.
83. - Safari, M., (2021). “Chronology and Study of Regional and Inter-Regional Interactions in Northern Slops of Central Alborz during Bronze Age Based on Bozrood Pey (Ghale- Ben) Excavation in Babol, Mazandaran”. Ph.D. Thesis in Archaeology, University of Mazandaran, (In Persian).
84. - Safari, M., Abbasnejad Seresti, R., Fazli Nashli, H., Thornton, C. & Thomalsky, J., (2021). “The Relative Chronology of the Bronze Age on the Northern Side of the Central Alborz Based on Typology of Pottery Discovered at Ghale-Ben in Babol, Mazandaran”. Parseh J. Archaeol Stud., 5 (17): 27-57, (In Persian). doi: https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.5.17.27.
85. - Shepard, A. O., (1974). Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D. C., ISBN: 9780872796201.
86. - Shortland, A. J. & Degryse, P., (2019). “Ceramics”. In: Archaeological Science: An Introduction, M. P. Richards & K. Britton, Cambridge University Press, Part V: 335-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139013826
87. - Stronach D., (1972). “Yarim Tepe”. in: Excavations in Iran, The British Contribution, Oxford: 21-23.
88. - Thornton, C. P., Gürsan-Salzmann, A. & Dyson, R. H. Jr., (2013). “Tepe Hissar and the fourth millennium of Northeastern Iran”. In: Ancient Iran and its Neighbors, C. Petrie (ed.)”, London: Oxbow Books: 131-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/paleorient.451
89. - Talai, H., (2008). Iranian Art and Archaeology in The First Millennium BC. Tehran: Samt, (In Persian).
90. - Towhidi, F., (2018). The art of pottery. Tehran: Samt, (In Persian).
91. - Young, T. C. Jr., (1969). “Excavations at Godin Tepe”. First progress Report. Royal Ontario Museum, Art and Archaeology Occasional Papers, No. 27, Toronto.
92. - Young, T. C. Jr. & Levine, L. D., (1974). “The Godin Project”. Second Progress Report. Royal Ontario Museum, Art and Archaeology Occasional Papers, No. 17, Toronto.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.