Abstract
Medicine is a science by which one can gain knowledge about the qualities of the human body. The exact equivalent of the word Medicine is physic, but in order to be understood at the global level, the equivalent of Medicine is used for it. Three groups of therapists are mentioned in the Avesta Zoroastrian Bible, surgeon, herbalist and psychotherapist. In the Avesta, θarita of the Sam family is the first physician, and Ahura Mazda gives him a jeweled knife to perform surgery. There is information about the medical condition during the Achaemenid and Parthian eras through the writings of Greeks historians, and these is good information left from Sassanid era medicine. In the research, an important part of contribution of ancient Iranians in the expansion and improvement of medical knowledge and treatment methods in ancient Iran is discussed. The questions of this essay are, where did the origin of medicine in Iran come from? Has medicine in ancient Iran been affected by religious teachings? And what was the relationship between culture and medicine in ancient Iran? The hypotheses of the article are as follows: medicine in ancient Iran was influenced by ancient civilizations such as Greece. Medicine in this period was influenced by Zoroastrian religion and in later periods by Islam. This research was done with descriptive and analytical method. Until the new discoveries of archaeologists in Mesopotamia and Nile and Indus valleys and the Iranian plateau, they were mostly of the opinion that scientific ideas originated from Greek scholars and philosophers, but historical evidence shows that with the emergence of Zoroaster, Iranians started a new era of scientific creativity and the most obvious sample of that is the establishment of the Hegmatane school or Ekbatan.
Keywords: Medicine, Ancient Iran, Treatment, Hygiene, Greece.

Introduction
The word “medicine “comes from Middle Persian. (Bizišk Nyberg, 1997), The assumed form of this word was in ancient Iran, which later became a physic. As for when Iranian medicine began, historians and orientalists believe that in ancient Iranian stories, the beginning and introduction of medicine was attributed to Jamshid, a mythical king, and He was the first person who taught people how to use medicine. Jamshid wanted to create a land for the people where no one would be hungry, thirsty, old or sick and to avoid death.  After the Aryan tribes entered the land of Iran, they inherited the advanced medicine of Egypt and Babylon, which had entered Iran through the Assyrians, and with this experience, they became the owners of a special school called “Moghan”.  In the Avesta, the Zoroastrian Bible, three types of doctors are recognized; the one who heals with a knife (surgeon), the other one who treats with healing herbs (the herbalist) and the third one who heals with the divine word (Mobad).  The most obvious aspect of the Avesta tradition in medicine is in the field of environmental health and disease prevention.  Most of these customs and teachings included the principles that are the basis of today’s disinfection and prevention methods.  Body, clothes, house and environment, water, wind, fire and soil and what is available to should be away from any pollution.

Iranian medicine in different historical periods
The medical history of Iran is limited to three periods due to the lack of written sources.
- The first period: from the Avesta and pre-Avesta era to the golden age of the Medes and Achaemenids and until the rise of the Sassanids.  Unfortunately, apart from short references in the Avesta and its continuation in some Pahlavi books and limited references in Greek sources, there are no other references from this long period; The most important scientific events of this era are the establishment of universities during the Median and Achaemenid kingdoms, which unfortunately, apart from scattered writings, there is no documented scientific evidence of scientific specializations and how to teach in these universities.
 The second period: It is the Sassanid era, fortunately, the works left from this period are not complete, but they sufficiently represent the medical knowledge of Iranians.  The establishment of Jundishapur Hospital is one of the important events in the medical history of Iran, and especially the “Anoushirvan” period, which historian’s call this period “Scientific and Literary Revolution of Ancient Iran”, many authors and researchers have praised in their books show the genius of Iranians in this period.
Jundishapur played an important role in the history of Iranian medicine; It is said that the initial establishment of this city dates back to the time before the arrival of the Aryans and was later rebuilt by Shapur.  His primary goal of this renovation was to create a place to settle Roman and Greek captives and use their expertise. 
The third period: It is the Islamic period when many scientists emerged from Iran, and without a doubt, the Iran of the Islamic period cannot be compared to any other period.  In this period, with the disappearance of class differences and the possibility of education for different strata of society, as well as the developments that appeared in calligraphy, Iranians surpassed the whole world in various scientific fields.  During this period, great Iranian scientists such as Ibn Sina and Razi created a great revolution in medical knowledge with their genius, which has aroused the wonder and admiration of the world to this day, and the human society has been influenced and borrowed from Iranian knowledge.

Hegmatane Medical School / Ekbatan
The first cultural institution that was established in the Mede era in the Hegmetane throne was Maghan Madhe Seminary, or as it is called today, the Iranian Academy of Sciences in ancient times. It was one of the great Maghans of ancient Iran in the Mede era, “Sina” was one of the most prominent Zoroasters.  ;  ``Sina’’, the son of Ahom Setut, came from Khwarazm or Sogd along with a number of Zoroastrian converts in the direction of Hegmatana in the early 6th century BC during the time of Ho and Kashtra to spread the religion to the kings of the Medes.  Sinai is considered one of the ancient Iranian spiritual magnates and the head of Iran’s medical lineage. The Greek school of Hippocratic medicine has greatly benefited from the Sinai School of medicine in Iran.  The members of Hamadan Sinai Academy were hundreds of Sinai graduates who were always engaged in studying and researching there.  The Greeks called it the school of the Ekbatan century.  “Plutarch mentioned Akbatan as the spiritual center of ancient Iran and the residence of Mughan.  He entered the school and personally observed It has been said that fields such as wisdom, astronomy, medicine and geography were taught there.

Conclusion
Until the dark curtains of ancient history were removed and the new discoveries of archaeologists in the ancient Mesopotamian plain, the Nile-Sand valleys and the Iranian plateau, most of them believed that scientific ideas originated from Greek sages and philosophers.  Historical evidence shows that with the emergence of Zoroaster, Iranians displayed a new round of their scientific creativity, and in this regard, the most specific example is the establishment of the Hegmatane school or Akbatan; The university that housed a collection of scientists of that time is called Hegmatan, which means the center of scientists, and there was an association with the membership of 100 scientists.  The indisputable value of a university with that size at the end of the 8th century BC is a clear sign of scientific progress and the influence of Iranians on the knowledge of mankind. In the Avesta, as the root of all diseases is from the devil, Ahura Mazda is introduced as a god who is the source of all It is knowledge and it transmits its knowledge to the faithful and chosen people with grace. There is no doubt that the prophets played an essential role in the development of human societies with their divine knowledge.  Medical knowledge is one of the characteristics of most prophets, Zoroaster is also one of these prophets.  Zoroastrian teachings, unlike the ancient religions that consider the heart as the organ of thinking, recognizes the mind as the organ of thinking, the poems of the Gathas above all reveal the wisdom of Zoroaster in guiding the society to knowledge and truth and achieving spiritual perfection in the Gathas to acquire knowledge.  And knowledge and its dissemination are emphasized and in general, man is called to rationalism.
The above material shows that the ancient Iranians were the source and origin of the greatest service to human sciences and knowledge with their belief in human ethics and virtues and with good thinking, uprightness of speech and uprightness of action.  Although the occurrence of wars and the invasion of foreign nations to this land, including the extinction of the Achaemenid dynasty by Alexander the Great and then the Seleucid dynasty by the Greeks in Iran, destroyed the cultural prosperity of Iran compared to the past era, and educational places were destroyed and books and scientific documents were destroyed.  It was lost and destroyed and created many shortcomings, but in the end it has not been able to prevent the message of genius and knowledge of ancient Iranians from reaching the future generations.  Also, the inseparable connection between medicine and religious teachings during the Sassanid era caused the commitment of doctors of that period to ethics and spirituality, and made them a worthy model for other sections of the society, as the religion of men.  The progress of Sasanian medical science was such that patients from other nations were brought to Sasanian medical centers and were treated; so the hypothesis of the relationship between religion and medicine in ancient Iran is confirmed.

The vast territorial expanse and unique geographical position of Sasanian Iran necessitated that major inter-civilizational trade and communication routes between East and West either traverse the Sasanian heartland or skirt its peripheries. This strategic geography played a pivotal role in advancing the Sasanian policy of expansionism and economic monopolization, as well as in facilitating commercial, cultural, and political interactions with regional and trans-regional polities. Within this context, examining the political-cultural relations between the Sasanians and ancient Yemen is of particular significance, given both territories’ possession of maritime fronts and their associated trade networks. Consequently, this research aims to investigate the nature and depth of the political and cultural relations between the Sasanians and Yemen, to identify the factors influencing the formation and evolution of these relations, and to assess the reciprocal impact of these relations on the historical developments of both lands. Furthermore, the role of archaeology in elucidating various dimensions of these relations will be considered. Through an analysis of historical and archaeological evidence, this study seeks to answer the following question: What factors led to the formation and perpetuation of political and cultural relations between the Sasanians and Yemen from the 4th to the 7th centuries CE? The findings indicate that hegemony over maritime trade routes played a central role in the interactions between Iran and Yemen during the Sasanian period. Moreover, the results of an examination of the artistic characteristics of specific archaeological finds from Yemen—namely, the Knight relief (from Dhofar), a female figure relief (from Dhofar), a fragment of a decorated textile depicting a Sasanian battle scene with Ethiopians (from Antinoë), and a carved four-faced capital (from the Qalʿa of Ḥasan al-ʿUr in Yemen)—reveal shared features with Sasanian art and corroborate the cultural-artistic influence of the Sasanians in the land of Yemen.

Abstract
Throughout history, interactions between societies have led to the evolution of cultures, with political systems and ruling powers playing a significant and effective role in this process of cultural amalgamation. A key focus of this research is to examine the dominant culture of the Median and Achaemenid societies and the mutual influences between Iranian culture and the non-Iranian cultures present within these states’ territories. In other words, this study aims to explore the causes and factors behind cultural collisions from the seventh to the fourth centuries BCE, the policies pursued by governments regarding the cultures and nations under their control or neighboring them, and the outcomes of the interactions between various cultures and Iranian civilization for both Iranians and non-Iranian communities. Based on these ambiguities and through an examination of available sources and evidence, along with references to historical texts, the results indicate that, in addition to Iran’s geographic position, which welcomed various tribes with diverse cultures, the coexistence of these groups inevitably influenced Iranian society. What accelerated and enhanced the amalgamation and integration of cultures within Iranian society was the presence of a common enemy, particularly threatening powers in the region, which united these tribes. The capabilities and potential of the Median and Achaemenid political systems, which had trans-regional objectives, played a crucial role in the connection and amalgamation of the existing cultures within Achaemenid territory. The Achaemenids aimed to attract non-Iranian forces and establish political dependency through political marriages and social ties, facilitating the cultural integration of subordinate tribes. This policy aimed to prevent separation and regional turmoil while expanding the cultural domain of the Achaemenids by absorbing and assimilating effective elements from various cultures into Iranian culture.
Keywords: Cultural Fusion, Ancient Iran, Media, Achaemenid, Political Marriage.

Introduction
In the evolutionary course of societies, and amidst the presence of significant trans regional powers with rich cultural heritage, one of the principal issues is to determine the nature of the cultural condition of Iranian society during the Median and, particularly, the Achaemenid eras. In this period, diverse cultures—from those along the Syr Darya (Sihun) to western Asia Minor and the shores of the Aegean Sea—were integrated into a unified political culture. The key question is whether this diversity and cultural plurality gave rise to a heterogeneous and unbalanced society in which no dominant role can be ascribed to Iranian culture, or whether we are confronted with a balanced synthesis of existing cultural elements, wherein a equilibrium was established—through cultural intermingling and fusion—between the distinctions and commonalities of Iranian and non-Iranian cultural facets.
Furthermore, an examination of the consequences of marital alliances that occurred between various ethnic groups and power holders both within and beyond the borders of Iran—as reflected in historical reports—and, more importantly, the occurrence of political marriages between Iranian governments and non-Iranian states, constitutes a highly significant topic. In this research, these issues will be discussed and analyzed in order to ascertain, independently of their varied political, economic, and security implications, the share and impact that such unions had on the culture of ancient Iranian society during the Median and Achaemenid periods. Additionally, the study will assess the extent to which the aforementioned governments succeeded in advancing their political objectives through recourse to this policy and what changes and transformations they effected in the cultural fabric of the region.
The research methodology employed in this article is based on a descriptive-analytical approach. The author has collected data through a critical examination of available sources and evidence, including primary historical texts (such as ancient historical accounts) and significant recent scholarship. This method relies on citation from library-based and primary sources, proceeding with a precise description of the data followed by their analysis to address the raised ambiguities. Specifically, the research focuses on investigating the causes and factors of cultural encounters, the policies of the Median and Achaemenid governments toward various ethnic groups and nations, and the outcomes of cultural interactions. This qualitative approach utilizes historical and cultural tools to analyze causal connections and cultural fusion, without reliance on quantitative or empirical methods.
This study holds considerable importance as it examines the role of cultural and political interactions in the evolution of ancient Iranian societies, particularly during the Median and Achaemenid eras (seventh to fourth centuries BCE). Its necessity arises from existing ambiguities in understanding the prevailing culture in Iranian society, where the cultural diversity of various ethnic groups (both Iranian and non-Iranian) within the vast Achaemenid realm may have produced a heterogeneous society. However, the research demonstrates that policies such as political marriages contributed to the creation of balance and cultural integration. The significance of this study lies in its exploration of the consequences of these connections on culture, politics, economy, and security, which not only aids in comprehending Iranian identity but also illustrates the role of ruling powers in synthesizing cultures to prevent unrest and extend cultural dominance. In the contemporary world, this research is essential as it offers models of cultural coexistence and diversity management that can serve as inspiration for modern societies, particularly in regions with high ethnic and cultural diversity. Moreover, given the geographical position of the Iranian Plateau as a crossroads of cultures, this study helps fill historical gaps concerning the influence of common adversaries and transregional objectives on cultural fusion.

Discussion
As ancient documents and evidence attest, in antiquity and on the Iranian Plateau, in most cases foreign inhabitants lived alongside the indigenous population. They established commercial relations with one another; marriages occurred between men and women of different nationalities; and at times individuals converted from one religion to another. There were even periods in which people worshipped both their own gods and those of foreigners simultaneously. It also happened that an individual would change his or her name and adopt one from another land, or, in addition to a personal name, take on the name of the people among whom he or she resided (Dandamayev, 1366 [1987]: 60). Through these developments—and particularly through the gradual penetration of the Iranian element into the western regions of Iran—it appears that a relatively new culture became prevalent in this area: a culture that was not purely Iranian, but rather a composite culture formed through the amalgamation of migrant and local elements.
In addition to inheriting the cultural legacy and achievements of the Medes, the Persians engaged in substantial borrowing from the indigenous cultures of the region, especially that of the Elamites, who possessed a state tradition spanning several millennia. More than the Medes, the Persians served as transmitters of the culture established in the southwestern Iranian Plateau—and even of Mesopotamian culture—into the heart of the plateau and the Achaemenid Empire. On the basis of personal names, prevailing religious beliefs, and even existing religious sites in various regions, one can trace the extent of Iranian culture in non-Iranian areas and among non-Iranian peoples. At the outset, however, it must be noted that on the Iranian Plateau, despite the formation of an empire, the custom of political marriages among families and tribes remained firmly in place; as observed, in certain regions—particularly in Fars and Elam—relations and exchanges date back to the period prior to Cyrus’s conquests. For example, in Babylon, from the first quarter of the sixth century BCE, Babylonians bore Iranian names.
The influence and predominance of Iranian culture—along with cultural syncretism resulting from relations between Iranian and non-Iranian peoples—led, during the Achaemenid period, to the adoption of Iranian names by non-Iranians, in addition to those who possessed such names due to mixed ancestry. With the expansion of Median influence, and subsequently that of the Achaemenids, into Asia Minor, these powers encountered an important and advanced civilization such as Lydia, which dominated the Ionian city-states and whose culture had profoundly influenced many Greek polities. Cultural confrontation between Iranians and Greeks, and the cultural impact of the Achaemenid state on the Ionian city-states, was evident from the very beginning of Persian presence in Asia Minor. This cultural intermixture intensified further with the Achaemenid domination of Asia Minor and the conquest of the Ionian islands and city-states. Indeed, one of the reasons for cultural—and even ethnic—convergence between Iranians and Greeks in certain regions was their coexistence. Among the primary causes of this coexistence were the relocation of Ionian populations to parts of Asia Minor and the settlement of Iranian populations in various areas of the same region.
By forging alliances and political marriages between Persians and other peoples and powers, the Achaemenids sought to “Achaemenidize” their domains through the integration of Iranian and non-Iranian cultures and the internalization of Persian culture among non-Iranians. They devoted considerable effort to aligning the interests of allies and affiliates with those of the Achaemenid state. Throughout the Achaemenid period, the expansion of imperial influence, the settlement of Iranians in non-Iranian regions (diaspora), and their presence in subject territories accelerated the process of acculturation.

Conclusion
One of the methods employed to integrate and bring together diverse peoples under a comprehensive culture was the creation of bonds and marital alliances among the people’s subject to the Median and Achaemenid states. Political marriage, as a socio-political phenomenon, was practiced throughout Iranian history with predetermined objectives aimed at consolidating social, political, military, economic, cultural, and religious relations among governments and groups. Rulers and governments consistently resorted to various strategies to ensure the continuation of their political existence, and one of the most effective means of achieving political—and even cultural—cohesion and unity was the establishment of bonds among different members of society through intra- and inter-dynastic marriages.
Accordingly, the Achaemenids’ objective in creating such ties and consenting to political marriages was to attract non-Iranian forces, draw them closer to the seat of power, bind them to the political system of the state, and, in other words, achieve the cultural integration of subject peoples and nations. Through cultural amalgamation and convergence—realized in religious beliefs and through marital alliances among peoples and individuals—the Achaemenids sought to ensure that non-Iranian groups would not regard them as outsiders. In addition to preventing separatism and regional unrest, the establishment of a dominant culture allowed the Achaemenid cultural sphere to extend far beyond its political borders, thereby facilitating the acceptance of imperial authority.
Drawing upon the inherent potential of Iranian culture, one of the Achaemenids’ notable initiatives was the selective adoption of significant, effective, and appealing elements from the cultures of subject peoples, their absorption and assimilation into Iranian culture, and their reticulation within a new cultural framework in which Iranian identity and elements held clear predominance.

Abstract
The horse held a prominent role in the culture of Iran and Mesopotamia, both from mythological and practical perspectives. The aesthetic treatment of horse equipment, beyond its functional aspect, was an expression of reverence for both the horse and its rider. This study aims to identify and analyze the structure, design, and motifs of horse covers (Jul) in Iran and Mesopotamia during the period from 1906 to 330 BCE. The main research question investigates the distinctive structural and decorative characteristics of horse covers in this era. The necessity of this research arises from the fact that, despite the significance of the horse and its equipment in ancient civilizations, the aesthetic and structural aspects of ancient horse covers have rarely been examined in previous studies. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the study is based on qualitative analysis of documentary data and archaeological evidence. The data were collected through systematic note-taking, and the statistical population includes all available examples- textile fragments, visual representations, and archaeological findings- through which the structure and design of the horse covers of this period can be identified and analyzed. The findings indicate that horse covers in Mesopotamia and Iran evolved from simple, utilitarian forms in the Assyrian period to more complex and decorative types during the Elamite, Median, and Achaemenid periods. Throughout this evolution, their structure developed in terms of size and composition, progressing from small, undecorated examples to large-scale pieces featuring organized and symmetrical animal and vegetal motifs. Beyond their decorative role, these motifs reflected the aesthetic sensibility and cultural values of their weavers. Technically, the use of both flat-weaving and knotted-pile techniques demonstrates a synthesis of functional traditions and advanced weaving skills of the time. Overall, the stylistic and structural evolution of horse covers (Jul) represents a gradual progression in technical mastery, structural precision, and aesthetic awareness, forming the foundation for the later development of carpet weaving.
Keywords: Horse Cover (Jul), Mesopotamia, Ancient Iran, Carpet Weaving, Design and Motif.

Introduction
The domestication of the second generation of horses (DOM2) between 4500 and 3000 BCE in the Pontic–Caspian Steppe marked a turning point in human civilization. These horses, which replaced the earlier and wilder DOM1 type, played a fundamental role in transportation, warfare, and the broader social, economic, and cultural transformations of ancient societies. Their introduction to Mesopotamia, likely during the Akkadian period and more certainly under the Third Dynasty of Ur (2112–2004 BCE), led to significant advances in equestrian technologies. From the Assyrian period (1906–609 BCE) onward, the full use of horse equipment—including harnesses, chariots, saddlecloths (jul), and bridles—became widespread, granting societies with improved horse breeds military and economic superiority and fostering extensive cultural diffusion across Eurasia.
In both Iran and Mesopotamia, the horse held an important place in mythology as well as in practical life—agriculture, warfare, hunting, and transport. The aesthetic treatment and adornment of the horse, including the weaving of the Jul (saddlecloth), reflected the reverence accorded to the animal and its rider. The Jul was a functional textile placed under the saddle to absorb sweat and protect the horse’s back while also ensuring the rider’s comfort and balance. These cloths, made from materials such as wool, cotton, leather, or silk, were produced in various techniques—knotted-pile, flat-woven, jajim, or felt—and were common among nomadic groups.
Archaeological and historical evidence from 1906 to 330 BCE (corresponding to the Assyrian, Elamite, Median, and Achaemenid periods) indicates that the use of horse saddlecloths was prevalent in Iran and Mesopotamia, though little is known about their structure, design, and motifs. This study adopts a descriptive–analytical approach based on documentary research, including textual, visual, and archaeological evidence. All available samples were examined using census sampling, and the data were analyzed qualitatively. The theoretical framework combines Gordon Child’s evolutionary–historical approach with Leroi-Gourhan’s perspective, enabling analysis of both the technical development and the symbolic and cultural dimensions of horse covers (Jul) in Mesopotamia and Iran.

Discussion
Analysis of Assyrian reliefs indicates that horse saddlecloths (Juls) of this period exhibited limited structural and decorative variation, and equestrian equipment was still in the early stages of development. None of the depictions show saddles, stirrups, or securing straps, suggesting that riders sat directly on the jul with their legs hanging freely. However, the finely carved details of the horse’s headgear, including bridles and bits, demonstrate notable technical refinement in this area. Two main types of Juls can be identified: the first, simpler type—likely made of leather or felt—features two flaps and three girth straps; the second, more elaborate type, structurally resembles modern examples and was probably used for ceremonial or ritual purposes. The designs and borders of this latter group are simple yet harmonious, with recurring motifs such as the four-pealed flower, which also appears on the king’s garments, suggesting symbolic correspondence. Technically, the precise weaving method remains uncertain, though evidence points to techniques derived from traditional floor-weaving practices such as pile or flat weaving. Overall, Assyrian juls reflect a transitional stage from purely functional horse gear toward a more aesthetic and symbolic approach in equestrian equipment.
The analysis of Elamite, Median, and Achaemenid Juls (horse saddlecloths) reveals significant stylistic and structural diversity compared to Assyrian examples, owing to a broader corpus that includes rhyta, reliefs, and two surviving woven pieces. Iranian Juls display a transition from purely functional coverings to highly aesthetic and symbolic works. The Rhyta from Maku and Susa (8th–7th centuries BCE) show large, body-covering Juls adorned with animal and floral motifs—dynamic scenes of leopards, ibexes, boars, birds, and trees—arranged symmetrically or diagonally, reflecting a free, pictorial compositional system distinct from the geometric order of Assyrian designs. In the Achaemenid silver Rhyton from Erebuni (5th century BCE) and a similar woven piece identified by Franses (2019), repeated ibex motifs, symmetry, and minimalism emphasize symbolic harmony rather than narrative complexity. This visual tradition continues in the Pazyryk carpet (5th–4th centuries BCE), where 23 visible Juls share a unified geometric structure: rectangular forms with serrated or tasseled edges, linear borders, and symmetrical, abstract designs suggesting both aesthetic refinement and technical mastery. Comparable Juls appear in the Apadana reliefs at Persepolis and the Greco-Persian sarcophagus from Çan, confirming the consistency of form—rectangular bodies with serrated tassels extending to the horse’s hindquarters—across centuries and regions. Collectively, these findings indicate that Iranian Juls evolved from simple utilitarian gear into intricate, symbolically charged textiles, bridging technical innovation with a distinct artistic vocabulary rooted in ancient weaving and decorative traditions.

Conclusion 
This study analyzes the structure, design, and production techniques of horse covers (Jul) from the Assyrian period to the end of the Achaemenid era (1906–330 BCE), demonstrating that in ancient Iran and Mesopotamia these textiles functioned as more than purely utilitarian objects. Over time, horse covers evolved into multilayered media for aesthetic expression, cultural identity, power relations, and technological advancement in textile production. The findings indicate that, beyond responding to technical and climatic needs, horse covers provided a platform for the manifestation of symbolic systems and visual imagination, serving as an intermediary between functional textiles and ritual carpets.
Comparative analysis of Assyrian and Iranian examples reveals that structural differences—particularly in size and extent of coverage—stem from the interaction of climate, function, and culture. Assyrian horse covers, limited mainly to the horse’s back, reflect a functional and minimalist approach, whereas the expanded coverage of Iranian examples enabled greater visual complexity and decorative development. In terms of design and motifs, the gradual transition from Assyrian geometric simplicity to the richness of Iranian animal and vegetal motifs marks the emergence of a coherent symbolic visual language, culminating in the motifs of the Pazyryk carpet.
The diversity of manufacturing techniques, including felting, leatherworking, flat weaving, and pile weaving, reflects both technical sophistication and a functional hierarchy in which pile-woven textiles held ceremonial and symbolic roles. Archaeological and visual evidence further indicates the social and political significance of horse covers, particularly during the Achaemenid period, when they became symbols of power and courtly display.
Within the theoretical framework, the findings align with Gordon Child’s evolutionary–historical approach and Leroi-Gourhan’s theory of the relationship between technique, body, and symbolic expression, positioning the horse cover as a liminal object between function, technology, and meaning. The study thus highlights the enduring role of horse covers in shaping ancient textile traditions and the visual culture of Iran.