logo
year 8, Issue 30 (1-2025)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2025, 8(30): 309-336 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Najafian M, Eghbali P, Hamzavi Y. (2025). A Comparative Study of the Execution Method of the Koshtehbori Stucco Decoration with other Stucco Decorations in Safavid Period Architecture. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 8(30), 309-336. doi:10.61882/PJAS.8.30.309
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-953-en.html
1- Ph.D. Candidate of Art Research, Department of Art Research, Faculty of Arts, Shahid University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Image Communication, Faculty of Arts, Shahid University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author). , eghbali@shahed.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Department of Architectural Ornaments, The Research center of Historical Buildings and Fabrics, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism (RICHT), Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1980 Views)
 Abstract
During the Safavid period, innovations were created in Stucco decorations. the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration is one of the most attractive and unique architectural decorations of the Safavid period, which was implemented with various motifs in some of the buildings of that period and has a special creativity and innovation that is different from the implementation of other types of Stucco decorations. Knowing the methods and implementation steps of Stucco decorations in restoration projects and studying them is considered as one of the essential elements and an inseparable part of the protection of historical Stucco decorations. The purpose of this research is to identify the similarities and differences, the variety of methods and the stages of implementation of Koshtehbori Stucco decoration with other Stucco decorations in the architecture of the Safavid period. The questions of this research are: What are the similarities and differences of Koshtehbori Stucco decoration with other Stucco decorations in Safavid period architecture in terms of the method and stages of construction and execution? What is the appropriate classification for technical types of Stucco decorations in Safavid architecture? The research method is descriptive-analytical and comparative, and the collection of findings is in the form of library studies and field observations. The results of the studies showed that, unlike other Stucco decorations of the Safavid period, in the execution of the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration, Finishing, polishing, Convex or concavity was not done on the surface of the motifs, and only the background of the design or some carving motifs. In terms of the method, stages and sequence of execution, the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration, is the most similar to the Stucco decoration with carved colored layers. These similarities are in terms of the thickness of each layer of one millimeter and the method of cutting at an angle of 90 degrees to the surface of the motifs and polishing and smoothing the carved parts. Is. Also, in terms of the method, steps and sequence of execution, the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration, is the most different from the carved decoration filled with colored gypsum.
Keywords: Koshtehbori, The Technique of Implementing Stucco Decorations, Classification of Stucco Decorations, Safavid Period Architecture.

Introduction
Stucco decorations in Iran’s architecture have been implemented with different techniques and methods, one of which is the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration. The method and technique of execution of the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration in the Safavid period architecture is different from the Stucco decorations before it and required less time and economic cost per unit area than the relief Stucco decorations of the previous periods. This ornament has a special beauty, it has a variety of colors or different motifs. Previous research by experts in Iranian architecture and art history has focused mostly on Stucco decoration motifs and less on stucco types, comparative analysis of construction methods and techniques. A special classification and understanding of the execution method of Safavid period Stucco decorations can draw more attention to documentation and practical aspects in their basic maintenance and restoration. This research aims to identify the similarities and differences, variety of methods and stages, and execution order of the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration in comparison with other Stucco decorations of the Safavid period, as well as classify the Stucco decorations of this period.
The research questions are: What is the appropriate classification for technical implementation types of Stucco decorations of Safavid period architecture? What are the similarities and differences between the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration and other Stucco decorations of the Safavid period in terms of construction methods and stages? Research method: This research used a descriptive-analytical method to investigate some architectural Stucco decorations in Iran through library studies and field observations. The statistical population of this research includes 6 types of common Stucco decorations in Safavid architecture. The common features and differences between the Koshtehbori decoration and other Stucco decorations of the Safavid period were presented in a descriptive-analytical and adaptive-comparative method in terms of execution methods and stages. For this purpose, common Stucco decorations were examined in terms of the order of executive layers, such as support, scratch coat(arriccio) and fine coat (intonaco) layers, type of background, design drawing and stabilization, plastered layer, and finishing steps. The findings of this research were collected through written and documented sources, as well as field investigations by the authors, including pictures of examples of common Stucco decorations of the Safavid period architecture. In addition to proposing a new classification and naming of some decorations, the research analyzed different types of Stucco decorations by comparing samples to identify similarities and differences between Safavid period Stucco decorations.
 
Discussion
- Presenting a suitable classification of Stucco decoration of Safavid period architecture
This research proposes a new classification system for Stucco decorations in Safavid period architecture based on seven specific criteria. These criteria include the method of shaping, the kind of materials used in the background, the appearance of the surfaces on the motifs, the size and amount of relief, finishing works, in terms of the background and shape of the motifs. Each criterion has a different category, which allows for a more precise identification and recognition of different Stucco decorations. This classification system is crucial for the conservation and restoration of these decorations, as it helps to avoid unprincipled interferences in restoration interventions.
 
- A comparative study of the Stucco decoration of Koshtehbori with other Stucco decorations in Safavid period architecture
In this regard, six different Stucco decorations that were commonly used and innovative during the Safavid period were selected and compared with the Stucco decoration of Koshtehbori in terms of execution method and order. These are:
A: Stucco decoration of Koshtehbori: This decoration, with different techniques and motifs, has been implemented in some buildings of the Safavid period. These decoration are often prepared, designed and implemented with various geometrical, Khataei and Slimy motifs on a background of plaster mortar, which is different from other plaster ornament methods.
B: Stucco decoration with carved colored layers: Among other Stucco decorations in the architecture of the Safavid period, this decoration is the most similar to the Stucco decoration of Koshtehbori.
C: Stucco decoration on Simgel: This decoration is different from the Stucco decoration of Koshtehbori in terms of grouting with mud in the background (empty space between the motifs), the curvature around the motifs, the relief of the motifs, and the shape of the motifs.
D: Stucco decoration on a flat mirror: In this Stucco decoration, flat mirrors are used as a Stucco substrate. In terms of the mirror background between the patterns, the curvature around the patterns, the relief of the patterns, and the shape of the patterns, this Stucco is different from the Stucco decoration of Koshtehbori.
E: Stucco decoration on the Koj mirror (Kopbori): This Stucco decoration is made using the combination of Koj mirror and Stucco parts. This decoration, in an additional stage of initial drawing and transfer of the design, adhesive plaster mortar behind the mirror, in terms of the mirror background of Koj between the motifs, the curvature around the motifs, the relief of the motifs and in the shape of the motifs with the Stucco decoration of Koshtehbori is different.
F: The Naghri Stucco decoration filled with colored gypsum mortar: the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration is the most different from the carved Stucco decoration filled with colored gypsum mortar compared to other Stucco decorations in Safavid period architecture
In the end, the six Stucco decorations of the Safavid period are compared with their sub-groups in the seven classifications in the architecture of the Safavid period. Based on this comparison, we can observe their similarities and differences in the subgroups. For example, the shaping technique of the six types is done in situ, and the type of material used in the background of the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration, the Stucco decoration with carved colored layers, and the Naghri decoration filled with colored plaster is gypsum. However, in the other three decorations with different materials, it is Simgel, flat mirror, and koj mirror.

Conclusion
Through the study and research conducted, a more comprehensive classification and suitable division for Stucco decorations in Iranian architecture has been presented. In this research, Safavid period gypsum decorations are classified based on a specific seven criterion, which includes shaping technique, material used in the background, surface appearance of patterns, size and amount of relief, and complementary works, in terms of both background and pattern shape. Each of these criteria has its own subgroups. 
Stucco decorations in Safavid architecture have similarities and differences in terms of their technical aspects and design. In the execution of the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration, unlike other Safavid Stucco decorations, carving, polishing, convex or concaving on the surface of patterns was not performed, and only the background or some parts of the pattern were carved and polished. In terms of the method, stages and sequence of execution, the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration, is the most similar to the Stucco decoration with carved colored layers. These similarities are in terms of the thickness of each layer of one millimeter and the method of cutting at an angle of 90 degrees to the surface of the motifs and polishing and smoothing the carved parts. Is. Also, in terms of the method, steps and sequence of execution, the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration, is the most different from the carved decoration filled with colored gypsum. Stucco decorations on Simgel, on flat mirrors, on Koj mirrors, in terms of the surface of the motifs, which may be Koj or a combination of Koj and Kav, and also, the type and appearance of the motifs, are different from the Koshtehbori Stucco decoration.
Full-Text [PDF 3034 kb]   (286 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2023/11/17 | Accepted: 2024/02/6 | Published: 2025/03/20

References
1. - آقاجانی‌اصفهانی، حسین، (1359). «تعمیرات نقاشی». اثر، 1(1): 71-90.
2. - آقاجانی‌اصفهانی، حسین، (1386). «دیوارنگاره‌های کشته‌بری در بناهای اصفهان عهد صفوی (عالی‌قاپو و چهل‌ستون)». گردهمایی مکتب اصفهان: مجموعه مقالات نگارگری، تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
3. - اتینگهاوزن، ریچارد؛ و گرابار، اولگ، (1383). «هنر و معماری اسلامی». ترجمۀ دکتر یعقوب آژند، تهران: سمت.
4. - اصلانی، حسام، (1391). «فن‌شناسی آرایه‌های گچی در معماری ایران دوران اسلامی». رسالۀ دکتری رشته مرمت، گرایش مرمت آثار تاریخی، دانشکدۀ مرمت، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان (منتشر نشده)
5. - اصلانی، حسام، (1385). «شیوۀ اجرای تزئینات کشته‌بری در کاخ عالی‌قاپو». گلستان هنر، 5: 130-123. https://golestanehonar.ir/browse.php?a_id=74&sid=1&slc_lang=fa
6. - اعظم‌زنگنه، آناهیتا، (1387). «سیر تحول گچ‌بری و تأثیر آن از هنر غرب در عصر قاجار و پهلوی». معماری و فرهنگ، 31(9): 115-108
7. - انصاری، جمال، (1366). «گچبری دوران ساسانی و تأثیر آن در هنرهای اسلامی». هنر، 13: 318-373.
8. - پرادا، ایدت، (2537). هنر ایران باستان. ترجمۀ یوسف مجیدزاده، تهران: نشر دانشگاه تهران.
9. - حمزوی، یاسر؛ کوچکزایی، علیرضا؛ و نگارستانی، علی‌اصغر، (1400). «ساختارشناسی ملات رنگی آرایه‌های گچی بوم‌ساب در مدرسۀ (کاروانسرا) گنجعلی‌خان کرمان». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، 5 (17): 287-302. DOR: 20.1001.1.26455048.1400.5.17.10.2
10. - شکفته، عاطفه، (1398). «مطالعه تطبیقی آرایه‌های گچی در دو بنای شاخص از خراسان بزرگ: رباط شرف و مسجد فریومد (سلجوقی، خوارزمشاهی و ایلخانی)». نگره، 52: 101-121. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2019.3574.1964
11. - شکفته، عاطفه؛ و صالحی‌کاخکی، احمد، (1393). «شیوه‌های اجرایی و سیر تحولات تزئینات گچی معماری ایران در قرون هفتم تا نهم هجری». نگره، 30: 81-63. https://negareh.shahed.ac.ir/article_156.html
12. - صالحی‌کاخکی، احمد؛ و اصلانی، حسام، (1390). «معرفی دوازده گونه از آرایه‌های گچی در تزئینات معماری دوران اسلامی ایران». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 1(3): 106-89. https://jarcs.ut.ac.ir/article_28697.html
13. - صالحی‌کاخکی، احمد؛ امامی، سید محمد امین؛ و اصلانی، حسام، (1389). «فناوری معرق‌های گچی تخمه‌گذاری در تزئینات معماری دورۀ صفویه». پژوهش‌های تاریخی، 46(2): 80- 63. https://jhr.ui.ac.ir/article_16515.html
14. - صالحی‌کاخکی، احمد؛ و تقوی‌نژاد، بهاره، (1395). «پژوهشی بر آرایه‌های هندسی محراب‌های گچبری دورۀ ایلخانی در ایران». پژوهش‌های معماری اسلامی، 10(4): 93-77. https://www.iust.ac.ir/jria/article-1-430-fa.html
15. - فراهانی، ابوالفضل، (1380). کتیبه‌ها: عبدا... قوچانی، مسجد جامع ساوه. تهران: مؤسسه انتشارات تعاون سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور
16. - گرابار، اولگ، (1379). شکل‌گیری هنر اسلامی. ترجمۀ مهرداد وحدتی‌دانشمند، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. چاپ اول
17. - مکی‌نژاد، مهدی، (1396). تاریخ هنر ایران در دوره اسلامی: تزئینات معماری. چاپ سوم، تهران: سمت.
18. - مکی‌نژاد، مهدی، (1389). «ساختار و قابلیت‌های خط کوفی در کتیبه‌نگاری معماری ایرانی (سلجوقی تا صفوی)». رسالۀ دکتری رشته پژوهش هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه شاهد.
20. - Aghajani Esfahani, H., (1980). “Painting repairs”. Asar, 1(1): 71-90. (in Persain).
21. - Aghajani Esfahani, H., (2007). “Mural paintings of Koshtehbori in the buildings of Isfahan during the Safavid period (Ali-Qapu and Chehl-Stun)”. Isfahan school gathering: a collection of painting essays, Tehran: Art Academy. (in Persain).
22. - Ansari, J., (1987). “Stucco of the Sassanid era and its influence on Islamic arts”. Art Quarterly, 13: 318-373. (in Persain).
23. - Aslani, Hessam. (2006). The way of execution of Koshtehbori decorations in Aliqapo Palace. Golestan art. Number 5: 130-123. (in Persain). https://golestanehonar.ir/browse.php?a_id=74&sid=1&slc_lang=fa
24. - Aslani, H., (2012). “The technology of Stucco decorations in the architecture of Iran during the Islamic era”. Doctoral dissertation in the field of restoration, restoration of historical monuments. Faculty of Restoration. (in Persain).
25. - Azam Zanganeh, A., (2008). “The evolution of Stucco decoration and its influence from Western art in the Qajar and Pahlavi eras”. Architecture and Culture, 31(9): 108-115. (in Persain).
26. - Ettinghausen, R. & Grabar, O., (2004). Islamic art and architecture. Translated by Dr. Yaqub Azhend. Tehran: Samt. (in Persain).
27. - Farahani, A., (2001). Inscriptions: Abdola Quchani, Saveh Mosque. Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization Cooperative Publishing Institute. (in Persain).
28. - Grabar, O., (2000). The formation of Islamic art. Translated by Mehrdad Vahdati Daneshmand. Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. First Edition. (in Persain).
29. - Hamzavi, Y., Kochzaei, A. & Nagarestani, A. A., (2021). “Structural analysis of colored mortar of Bom-Sab Stucco decorations in Ganj Ali Khan Kerman School (Caravansera)”. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud., 5 (17): 287-302. (in Persain). DOR: 20.1001.1.26455048.1400.5.17.10.2
30. - Makinjad, M., (2010). “The structure and capabilities of Kufic script in Iranian architectural inscriptions (Seljuq to Safavid)”. Doctoral dissertation in the field of art research, Faculty of Arts, Shahid University. (in Persain).
31. - Makinjad, M., (2017). History of Iranian art in the Islamic period: architectural decorations. Third edition, Tehran: Samt. (in Persain).
32. - Prada, I., (1973). Ancient Iranian art. Translated by: Yusuf Majidzadeh, Tehran: Tehran University Press. (in Persain).
33. - Salehi Kakhki, A. & Taghvinjad, B., (2016). “A research on the geometrical decorations of plaster altars of the Ilkhanid period in Iran”. Islamic Architecture Research Quarterly. 10(4): 93-77. (in Persain). https://www.iust.ac.ir/jria/article-1-430-fa.html
34. - Salehi Kakhki, A. & Aslani, H., (2011). “Introducing twelve types of Stucco decorations in the architectural decorations of the Islamic era of Iran”. Archaeological studies, 1(3): 106-89. (in Persain). https://jarcs.ut.ac.ir/article_28697.html
35. - Salehi Kakhki, A., Emami, S. M. A. & Aslani, H., (2010). “The technology of Tokhmehgozari gypsum Moaragh in the architectural decorations of the Safavid period”. Historical researches, 46(2): 63-80. (in Persain). https://jhr.ui.ac.ir/article_16515.html
36. - Shokfete, A. & Salehi Kakhki, A., (2014). “Implementation methods and evolution of plaster decorations in Iranian architecture in the 7th to 9th centuries of Hijri”. Negrah, 30: 81-63. (in Persain). https://negareh.shahed.ac.ir/article_156.html
37. - Shokfete, A., (2019). “A comparative study of Stucco decorations in two prominent buildings of Great Khorasan: Rabat Sharaf and Faryomed Mosque (Seljuqi, Khwarazmshahi and Ilkhani)”. Negrah, 52: 101-121. (in Persain). https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2019.3574.1964

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.