logo
year 8, Issue 30 (1-2025)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2025, 8(30): 337-363 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nayeri P, Vatandoost A, Samanian K. (2025). Explaining the Theoretical Foundations of Readability Importance in Traditional Conservation and Preservation Approaches in Chehel Sotoun Palace Wall Paintings in Isfahan. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 8(30), 337-363. doi:10.61882/PJAS.8.30.337
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-945-en.html
1- PhD student in Conservation and Restoration of Historical and Cultural Objects, Department of Restoration of Cultural and Historical Objects, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Institute of Conservation and Restoration, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism (RICHT), Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Associate Professor, Department of Restoration of Cultural and Historical Objects, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran. , Samanian_k@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1727 Views)
Abstract
Wall paintings drawn in the past depict valuable aspects of history and culture of the time of their creation. The goal of this paper is to explore the concept and readability in the wall paintings of Chehel Sotoun Palace in Isfahan. To what extent the approaches of traditional artists and conservators have been based upon Iranian cultural and artistic heritage. how can the meaning behind Chehel Sotoun’s paintings’ readability be evaluated? The research method used in this paper is descriptive-analytical. The goal is to examine the thoughts and theories of conservation and preservation scholars in regards to the influence of Iranian-Islamic cultural background on traditional conservation and preservation approaches in these works. It also explores the perception and significance of the main readability element during the mentioned conservation period. The analyses conducted indicate that approaches of traditional conservators and artists were based on attention to the history and art of the Iranian culture and artistic styles of their own time. Relying on emulation and reinterpretation of paintings and emphasizing on passing on the content and inner meaning of the work through the preservation of the narrative form of mural paintings in Chehel Sotoun, they have provided greater readability of these works for the audience.
Keywords: Protection, Conservation, Readability, Mural, Chehel Sotoun.

Introduction
Establishing a proper connection between the audience and artworks will not be possible unless we understand and grasp the inner meaning. The principle of readability is always based on the relationship between the creator, the art, and the audience. Mural painting have been a symbol of human enthusiasm for creating artworks. Starting from simple forms that symbolize celebration and hunting, Mural Paintings have transformed into concepts that represent the culture and national symbols of a nation or a group of people. The passage of time leads to physical damages to an artwork. When it comes to wall paintings, the conservator must make sure to adhere to scientific principles and important conservation considerations such as aesthetics, authenticity, integrity, and readability. To respect the integrity of an artwork is an essential part of artistic authenticity and will contribute to the readability of the artwork (Great, 2006, p. 6, Pollsson).
In Iran, we still observe that the restoration of historical artefacts are done based on personal views. Salvador Muñoz Viñas argues that classical conservation seeks the objective truth of an artwork and the purpose of conservation is to reinforce its structural and cognitive integrity in order to preserve its true nature. Artworks contain a wealth of information, messages, and meanings. The role of the conservator should be performed properly to enhance the readability of the artwork.
Readability has a hierarchical structure that ensures the preservation of the authenticity and cultural values of an artistic work. Understanding the various dimensions of communication between the creator of the work and the contemporary and future observer and audience has received considerable attention from conservation scholars. The audience, depending on different political, social, and cultural and personal views, can have different perceptions of the work. Conservation and preservation operations also have a significant impact on the readability of artistic works in order to understand and interpret the inner truth of the work.
Objective: 1- This study aims to explore the approaches and methods of traditional preservation and conservation in the wall paintings of Chehel Sotoun Palace in Isfahan, Iran. It aims to analyse the cultural and artistic history of Iran reflected in these paintings and to elucidate the concept and significance of readability in these artworks during the conservation process.
Question: The question is to what extent Iranian cultural and artistic history has been considered by the traditional artists and conservators. With regard to the wall paintings, the question asks how the concept of readability could be evaluated.
Hypothesis: Readability, as a principle in the preservation and conservation of historical-cultural artifacts, especially wall paintings, can depend on the theoretical and practical conservation approaches of its historical period.
Method: Following research is conducted using a descriptive-analytical method with a qualitative and interpretive approach. Data is collected through document studies, library research, observations, and fieldwork to analyze the relevant topics regarding the significance of readability in the approaches of preservation and conservation of the said wall paintings.

Discussion
This research examines the significance of readability in the preservation and restoration of the wall paintings in the Chehel Sotoun Palace in Isfahan, Iran. The findings reveal that the techniques employed by past artists and restorers are deeply intertwined with Iran’s cultural and artistic heritage, prompting critical questions about how these methods affect the artworks’ overall readability.
The study indicates that aesthetic considerations often take precedence over traditional restoration practices, resulting in a neglect of the intrinsic value and historical context that enhance a work’s readability. This emphasis on aesthetics can lead to misunderstandings regarding the artists’ intentions and the cultural narratives embedded in the wall paintings. While restorers aim to preserve the quality and visual appeal of the artworks, their methods may inadvertently result in a loss of originality and meaning, thereby undermining the effectiveness of the narratives intended for modern audiences.
Moreover, the paper identifies a significant gap in existing research concerning the evaluation of readability after restoration. Although many studies focus on the technical aspects of restoration, few address how these interventions impact the viewer’s ability to understand, interpret, and engage with the artworks. This gap highlights the necessity for a paradigm shift in restoration practices, prioritizing readability rather than treating it as an afterthought. It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study; the findings are specific to the wall paintings examined and may not generalize to all restoration practices. The cultural nuances and historical significance of artworks vary greatly across different regions and periods. Additionally, the subjective nature of readability complicates the creation of a standardized framework for assessing the effectiveness of restoration methods.
Based on these findings, future research should focus on developing a comprehensive methodology for evaluating readability in restored artworks. This could involve interdisciplinary collaborations among restorers, conservators, art historians, and audience researchers to better understand the impact of restoration practices on viewer experiences. Incorporating audience feedback into the restoration process could enhance readability and engagement, preserving both the aesthetic and narrative dimensions of the artworks for future audiences.
Ultimately, this research emphasizes the importance of integrating cultural heritage, artistic intent, and audience engagement in restoration methods. By doing so, it fosters a deeper appreciation of the historical narratives within artworks and the artists’ visions, ensuring their continued relevance and readability for contemporary and future audiences. This approach honors the original creators while illuminating the cultural roots of our shared heritage.

Conclusion
Previous artists and conservators made interventions in their preservation and conservation approaches to the wall paintings of Chehel Sotoun Palace in Isfahan, taking the Iranian cultural and artistic history as well as methods and techniques of their predecessors into account. These interventions are considered significant due to their consideration of the historical period, cultural-artistic perspective, style, and techniques of that era. This phenomenon also existed in European countries, where skilled painters would perform conservation work on their own or on the works of others, thereby leaving their artistic presence on the intended artwork. They aimed to keep the inner content of the work alive as well as reinterpret and transfer that content to their own era, providing a platform for the audience to receive the narrative and inner content of the work. The longevity of the narrative in the mind and memory of the audience leads to the readability of the work. This kind of understanding is what makes the art readable.
If the traditional approaches to the protection and conservation of wall paintings in their own era and time are evaluated, not only the perspective and method that is considered as part of their valuable traditional heritage and historical-cultural values will not be condemned, but it will be contemplated and protected more than ever. Looking at traditional conservation will not only face criticism but will also have the potential and value to envision a better future for the preservation and conservation of historical-cultural works in Iran. 
Full-Text [PDF 1490 kb]   (350 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Interdisciplinary
Received: 2023/11/9 | Accepted: 2024/01/3 | Published: 2025/03/20

References
1. - اخگر، مجید، (1385). «زیبایی‌شناسی و هرمنوتیک». کتاب ماه هنر، 98 و 97: 1-7.
2. - اسدپور، رضا، (1389). «نماد شناخت ایران باستان در رسائل فارسی سهروردی». پژوهشنامۀ ادیان، 7: 1-29
3. - افسر، کرامت‌الله؛ و موسوی، سید احمد، (1355). پاسداری از آثار باستان در عصر پهلوی. تهران: انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و هنر، ادارۀ کل حفاظت آثار باستانی و بناهای تاریخی ایران.
4. - اکبری، رضا، (1392). «بازسازی دیدگاه ملاصدرا دربارۀ زیبایی و هنرآفرینی». فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، 2: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitp.2013.35745
5. - الفاخوری، حنا، (1367). تاریخ فلسفه در جهان اسلامی. تهران: سازمان انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی.
6. - بوکهارت، تیتوس، (1392). هنر مقدس. ترجمۀ جلال ستاری، تهران: انتشارات سروش، چاپ ششم.
7. - بهشتی، محمد؛ نجارنجفی، الناز؛ و ابوترابیان، بهنام، (1396). شیخ بهایی و توپ مروارید. تهران: انتشارات روزنه، چاپ اول.
8. - پازوکی، شهرام، (1392). حکمت هنر و زیبایی در اسلام. تهران: مؤسسه تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری، متن، چاپ سوم.
9. - پاکباز، رویین، (1378). دائره‌المعارف هنر. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر، چاپ اول.
10. - پالمر، ریچارد، (1387). علم هرمنوتیک. ترجمۀ سعید حنایی کاشانی، تهران: نشر هرمس، چاپ چهارم.
11. - تولستوی، لئون، (1383). هنر چیست؟ ترجمۀ کاوه دهگان، تهران: نشر امیرکبیر، چاپ یازدهم.
12. - حبیبی، سید محسن؛ و صمدی‌کافی، نگین، (1399). «پالیمپسست «لایه‌نگاری»؛ ابزاری برای تبیین کیستی شهر تاریخی». صفه، 30 (89): 71-90. https://doi.org/10.29252/soffeh.30.2.71
13. - حقایق، آذین؛ و فهیمی، اصغر، (1397). «خوانش انتقادی بازنمایی تصویری نبرد چالدران در کاخ چهل‌ستون اصفهان». جستارهای تاریخی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 9 (1): 65-85. https://doi.org/10.30465/hcs.2018.3257
14. - حلّی، حسن ابن یوسف، (1381). الجوهر النّضید. قم: انتشارات بیدارفر.
15. - دمندان، پریسا، (1382). هزار جلوۀ زندگی، تصویرهای ارنست هولتسر از عهد ناصری. تهران: مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی، سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی.
16. - رامین، علی، (1390). فلسفۀ تحلیلی هنر. تهران: مؤسسۀ تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری متن، چاپ سوم.
17. - ربیعی، هادی؛ و غفاری، میترا، (1397). «محاکات در نقاشی از دیدگاه ابن‌سینا». حکمت معاصر، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 9 (1): 63-78. https://doi.org/10.30465/cw.2018.3273.
18. - رید، هربرت، (1381). معنی هنر. ترجمۀ نجف دریابندری، تهران: سازمان انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی، چاپ هشتم.
19. - زاندر، جوزپه، (1396). گزارش مرمت بناهای تاریخی ایران، گزارش‌ها و رساله‌های ایزمئو. ترجمۀ اصغر کریمی، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری، چاپ اول.
20. -زمانی، نرجس؛ و احمدی، حسین، (1400). «مطالعۀ سنت تعمیرات پیشین و مبانی رویکردهای جدید حفاظت و مرمت در دیوارنگاره‌هایی از کاخ چهلستون». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، 5 (18): 237-263. DOR: 20.1001.1.26455048.1400.5.18.7.1
21. - شیخی، علیرضا؛ و دشتبانی‌ملک‌آباد، مینا، (1397). «خوانشی بر نقاشی‌های دیواری حمام مهدی قلی بیگ مشهد». هنرهای تجسمی (هنرهای زیبا)، 23: 52-39. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2017.223856.665571
22. - صادقی، حبیب‌اله؛ و اله‌یاری‌چرمهینی، شهریار، (1396). «آسیب‌شناسی نقاشی دیواری در فرآیند مرمت از حیث اصالت و هویت در کاخ چهل‌ستون و عالی‌قاپوی اصفهان». نگره، 41: 137-126. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2017.515
23. - صفایی‌جلیسه، سمانه، (1400). «مطالعۀ تطبیقی نظریۀ تقلید در باب هنر از دیدگاه فلاسفۀ غرب و فلاسفۀ ایرانی-اسلامی». پژوهش در هنر اسلامی: 6 (6). https://civilica.com/doc/1496306/
24. - فارابی، ابونصر، (1991). آرا اهل مدینه الفاضله. بیروت: انتشارات دارالمشرق، چاپ هفتم.
25. - فروغی، محمدعلی، (1344). سیر حکمت در اروپا. تهران: نشر زوار.
26. - گروتر، یورک کورت، (1390). زیباشناسی در معماری. ترجمۀ جهانشاه پاکزاد و عبدالرضا همایون، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، چاپ هفتم.
27. - لاکست، ژان (1400). فلسفۀ هنر. ترجمۀ محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی، تهران: انتشارات ماهی، چاپ پنجم.
28. - وفامهر، مهدی (1390). زندگی و آثار هنری حاج میرزا آقا امامی. اصفهان: انتشارات طراحان هنر، چاپ اول.
29. - وطن‌دوست، رسول، (1395). جستارهای تاریخی و فلسفی در حفاظت از میراث‌فرهنگی. ترجمه، تدوین و مقدمه: رسول وطن‌دوست، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری، چاپ اول.
31. - Afsar, K. & Mousavi, S. A., (1976). Preserving historical monuments in the Pahlavi era. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Art Publications, General Department of Protection of Historical Monuments and Sites of Iran. (In Persian).
32. - Akbari, R., (2013). “Reconstructing Mulla Sadra’s view on beauty and artistic creation”. Philosophy and Islamic Theology, 2: 20-1. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitp.2013.35745 (In Persian).
33. - Akhgar, M., (2006). “Aesthetics and hermeneutics”. Monthly Art Book, 98: 97-7. (In Persian).
34. - Alcast, J., (2021). Philosophy of art. M. R. Abolghasemi, Trans., Tehran: Mahi Publications. (5th ed.). (In Persian).
35. - AlFakhouri, H., (1988). History of philosophy in the Islamic world. Tehran: Organization for Publications and Education of the Islamic Revolution. (In Persian).
36. - Avrami, E., (2000). “Values and heritage conservation”. Conservation: The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter, 15(2): 18-21.
37. - Beheshti, M., Najarnajafi, N. & Abutorabian, B., (2017). Sheikh Baha’i and the pearl ball. Tehran: Roozaneh Publications. (In Persian).
38. - Brajer, I., (2008). “Values and opinions of the general public on wall paintings and their restoration: A preliminary study”. Studies in Conservation, 53: 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2008.53.supplement-1.33
39. - Brajer, I., (2009). Authenticity and restoration of wall paintings: Issues of truth and beauty. na.
40. - Brajer, I., (2015). To retouch or not to retouch? Reflections on the aesthetic completion of wall paintings. CeROArt. Conservation, exposition, Restauration d’Objets d’Art (No. HS). Association CeROArt asbl. https://doi.org/10.4000/ceroart.4619
41. - Burckhardt, T., (2013). Sacred art. J. Satari, Trans., Tehran: Soroush Publications. (6th ed.). (In Persian).
42. - Dmandan, P., (2003). A thousand aspects of life: Images of Ernst Holzner from the Naseri era. Tehran: Cultural Heritage Document Center, Cultural Heritage Organization. (In Persian).
43. - Farabi, A. N., (1991). Views of the people of the virtuous city. Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq Publications. (7th ed.). (In Persian).
44. - Froughi, M. A., (1965). The evolution of wisdom in Europe. Tehran: Zavar Publications. (In Persian).
45. - Groter, Y. K., (2011). Aesthetics in architecture. J. S. Pakzad & A. Homayoun, Trans., Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Publications. (7th ed.). (In Persian).
46. - Habibi, S. M. & Samadi Kafi, N., (2020). “Palimpsest “layering”; A tool for explaining the identity of historical cities”. Architecture and Urban Planning, 30(89): 71-90. https://doi.org/10.29252/soffeh.30.2.71 (In Persian).
47. - Haghayegh, A. & Fahimifar, A., (2018). “A Critical Reading of Visual Representation of the “Chaldiran Battle” on the Isfahan’s Chihilsutun Palace”. Historical Studies, 9(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.30465/hcs.2018.3257
48. - Hedi, (2011). Life and artistic works of Haj Mirza Agha Imami. Isfahan: Art Designers Publications. (1st ed.). (In Persian).
49. - Helli, H. Y., (2002). Al-Jawhar al-Nadid. Qom: Bidarfar Publications. (In Persian).
50. - Jarman, N., (1998). “Painting landscapes: The place of murals in the symbolic construction of urban space”. In: A. Buckley (Ed.), Symbols in Northern Ireland: 81–98. https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/bibdbs/murals/jarman.htm
51. - Khodadadi, M. & Haji Ghadimi, A., (2020). “Exploring the role of art in promoting Islamic identity”. Journal of Art Research and Studies, 6(2): 21-35. (In Persian).
52. - Lynch, K., (1984). “Reconsidering The Image of the City”. In: Rodwin, L., Hollister, R.M. (eds) Cities of the Mind. Environment, Development, and Public Policy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9697-1_9
53. - Matero, F. G., (2007). Matero, Frank G., “Loss, Compensation, and Authenticity: The Contribution of Cesare Brandi to Architectural Conservation in America” (2007). Departmental Papers (Historic Preservation). 11. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_papers/11
54. - Palmer, L., (2019). Promoting artworks’ legible history through conservation and restoration treatments. ARH4931: A Cultural History of the Color Pink, November 9, 2019. https://arts.ufl.edu/site/assets/files/191249/reading_color_leah_palmer.pdf
55. - Palmer, R., (2008). The science of hermeneutics. S. H. Kashani, Trans., Tehran: Hermes Publishing. (4th ed.). (In Persian).
56. - Pazuki, S., (2013). The wisdom of art and beauty in Islam. Tehran: Institute for Authorship, Translation, and Publication of Artistic Works. (In Persian).
57. - Philippot, P., (1972). Historic preservation: Philosophy, criteria, guidelines. In Historical and philosophical issues in the conservation of cultural heritage. Getty Conservation Institute.
58. - Pollsson, T. G., (2008). Retouching of art on paper. Archetype.
59. - Rabiee, H. & Ghafari, M., (2018). “Mimesis in painting from Ibn Sina’s perspective”. Contemporary Wisdom, 9(1): 63-78. https://doi.org/10.30465/cw.2018.3273. (In Persian).
60. - Reed, H., (2002). The meaning of art. N. Daryabandi, Trans., Tehran: Organization for Publications and Education of the Islamic Revolution. (In Persian).
61. - Sadeghi, H. & Alahyari Chermehini, S., (2017). “Damage assessment of wall paintings in the restoration process in terms of authenticity and identity in the Chehel Sotoun and Ali Qapu Palaces of Isfahan”. Negareh, 41: 137-126. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2017.515 (In Persian).
62. - Safaei Jaliseh, S., (2021). Comparative study of the theory of imitation in art from the perspectives of Western philosophy and Iranian-Islamic philosophy. Research in Islamic Art. https://civilica.com/doc/1496306/ (In Persian).
63. - Schleiermacher, F., (1998). Hermeneutics and criticism: And other writings, A. Bowie, Ed., Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814945
64. - Sheikhi, A. & Dashtibani Malekabad, M., (2018). “A reading of the wall paintings of the bath of Mehdi Quli Beg in Mashhad”. Visual Arts (Fine Arts), 23: 39-52. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2017.223856.665571 (In Persian).
65. - Tolstoy, L., (2004). What is art? K. Dehghan, Trans., Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing. (In Persian).
66. - Vatandoust, R., (2016). Historical and philosophical essays on the protection of cultural heritage, R. Vatandoust, Trans., Comp., & Intro., Tehran: Publications of the Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute. (In Persian).
67. - Zander, G., (2017). Report on the restoration of historical monuments in Iran, reports and dissertations of Izmau. A. Karimi, Trans., Tehran: Publications of the Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute. (1st ed.). (In Persian)
68. - Zamani, N., & Ahmadi, H., (2022). “The Tradition of Previous Repairs and the Foundations of New Approaches to Conservation and Restoration in Murals of Chehelstoun Palace”. Parseh J Archaeol Stud., 5(18), 237-263. DOR: 20.1001.1.26455048.1400.5.18.7.1 (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.