logo
year 7, Issue 26 (2-2024)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2024, 7(26): 363-382 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Daneshzadeh R, Oladi R, Pourtahmasi K, Rahmani G. (2024). Identification of the Timbers used in Saqanefars of Mazandaran (Case Study: Qaemshahr City). Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 7(26), 363-382. doi:10.22034/PJAS.7.26.363
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-810-en.html
1- Ph.D. student, Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran , oladi@ut.ac.ir
3- Professor, Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
4- Assistant Professor, Research Center for Conservation of Cultural Relics, Research Institute for Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1751 Views)
Abstract
Saqanefars are kinds of wooden ritual monuments with religious functionality, found only in Mazandaran province, north of Iran, and date back to the Qajar era. In these buildings, the mourning of Muharram and other mourning rituals are held every year. Despite the cultural importance of Mazandaran’s Saqanefars, the type of wood used in these buildings has not yet been identified and researches have been focused on their architecture and paintings. In this research, the wood used in different structural members of five Saqanefars in different areas of Qaemshahr including Ghadikola Nokandehka (GN), Seyed Abosaleh (SA), Reykandeka (RK), Ahangarkola Bishesar (AB), and Vostakola (VK) were examined macro- and microscopically. After extracting a list of wood anatomical features from the stained microscopic sections, each specimen was identified. All studied specimens were of ring-porous hardwoods. Except for GN, other wood samples turned the water golden after immersion. The wood species used in the Saqanefars of SA, RK, AB, and VK were identified as Zelkova (Zelkova carpinifolia) while the Saqanefar of GN were made of Persian oak (Quercus macranthera). Both kinds of wood are durable, have little moisture uptake, and do not require much repair and maintenance work. Oaks and other tree species with high-quality constructional timber were as widespread as Zelkova in the forests near studied Saqanefars. Hence, the preference for Zelkova could not solely be related to its availability and technical quality. Considering that from the 16th century onwards, Zelkova wood became one of the most popular types of timber for the construction of historical and religious buildings in the Far East (especially in Korea and Japan), and the similarity of the architecture and painting of wooden Saqanefars to the temples in these countries, choosing this wood could partly be influenced by cultural exchanges.
Keywords: Wooden Structure, Cultural Heritage, Sacred Building, Wood Identification, Iran.

Introduction
A Saqanefar is a kind of ritual monument in Mazandaran province, north of Iran. Some older Saqanefars are completely wooden and were built in the late Safavid and early Qajar periods, and due to cultural exchanges between the local people and Chinese merchants, they are partially influenced by the architecture of Buddhist temples. Despite the cultural importance of Mazandaran Saqanefars, the type and age of the timbers used in them has not been investigated so far, and researches have been limited to their architecture and surface paintings. However, knowing the type of constructional timbers used in ancient wooden structures and objects can provide many unknown facts about the history, culture and trades in a region. Moreover, for the maintenance and renovation of ancient buildings, it is essential to know the type of wood used in them. In this research, the types of used timbers in the historical Saqanefars of Qaemshahr city were identified and discussed. The main hypothesis of the research was that due to the sacredness of Saqanefar s, lumbers from a certain tree species was used in their construction.

Materials and Methods 
Five Saqanefars were identified in different areas of Qaemshahr city, located in the villages of Ghadikola Nokandehka (GN), Seyed Abosaleh (SA), Reykandeka (RK), Ahangarkola Bishesar (AB), and Vostakola (VK). Small wooden samples were extracted from different parts of each monument, using a handsaw or an increment borer. The transverse surface of the samples was sanded and first examined macroscopically. Then, thin sections were cut, stained, and analyzed, microscopically. The anatomical features of the wood of each sample were extracted based on the IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification (Wheeler et al., 1989) and finally, each sample was identified.

Results and Discussion 
With the macroscopic and microscopic examination of the samples, it was found that all samples extracted from different structural members of a Saqanefar are made of the same wood species. The wood used in the four Sqanefars of SA, RK, AB, and VK were all from zelkova trees (Zelkova carpinifolia), while the Sqanefar GN was made of Persian oak (Quercus macranthera). This distinction was evident in the golden color of the water after immersing the wood of the first four Saqanefar and the absence of such a state in the last one. Zelkova is a high-quality wood and is known as one of the best construction timbers. Zelkova wood has a low moisture uptake, and in addition to wooden structures, it was also used to make the door and window frames of mosques in Iran (Browicz, 1982). This wood was widely used for construction of historic timber structures (Hwang et al., 2009) and places of worship in the Far East, and is considered the most important hardwood in building of old temples in South Korea (Kim & Choi, 2016). In Japan, Zelkova wood has been used to build temples since the 16th century. In fact, it was the Chinese carpenters who taught the Japanese how to work with this tough wood and suggested its use in the 15th century (Mertz, 2016). Oak has been one of the most popular type of wood for building timber for centuries due to its high durability and the little need for maintenance and repair. 

Conclusion 
Most of the old, timber-structured Saqanefars in the villages of north Iran were made of zelkova, and only one of the five investigated structures was from oak wood. Considering that these two woods are of good and comparable quality, and almost the similar abundance of these two species in the forests around the location of Saqanfears, the preference for using Zelkova is not only due to technical and economic issues, and could be related to cultural reasons. Zelkova wood is mostly used for the construction of shrines and religious sites in the Far East and especially in Korea, and due to the similarity of the architecture and painting of Saqanefars to the temples in these countries, the choice of Zelkova timber for the construction of these places can be partly influenced by cultural exchanges. 
Full-Text [PDF 2034 kb]   (623 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Interdisciplinary
Received: 2022/12/27 | Accepted: 2023/02/13 | Published: 2024/02/29

References
1. - احمدی، حسین؛ پورطهماسی، کامبیز؛ و محمدی‌آچاچلویی، محسن، ‌(1397)‌‌‌. «شناسایی ‌‌چو‌ب‌‌ها‌ی به‌کاررفته در اجزای سازها‌ی هفت بنای تاریخی مربو‌ط به دو‌ران صفو‌ی و‌ قاجار». نشریۀ علمی مرمت و معماری ایران، 8 (15): 118-107. DOR: 20.1001.1.23453850.1397.8.15.1.6؛ https://mmi.aui.ac.ir/article-1-161-fa.html
2. - اخگری، محمد؛ و امیرکلائی، ابراهیم، (1383). «سقانفار، یادمان مذهبی و سنتی مازندران». فصلنامه فرهنگ و مردم ایران، 5: 108-85.
3. - اولادی، رضا؛ نیارمی، تقی‌شعبان؛ زارع‌حسین‌آبادی، حمید؛ و رستمی، مصطفی، (1401). «ویژگی‌های ممتازِ چوب‌های مورد استفاده در هنر چوتاشی (ظروف چوبی سنتی در شمال ایران)». نشریۀ جنگل و فرآورده‌های چوب، 75 (2): 167-155. 10.22059/JFWP.2021.333179.1193
4. - پیرنیا، ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌محمدکریم؛ و ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌معماریان‌‌‌،‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ غلامحسین،‌‌‌ (1387)‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌. سبک‌‌شناسی معماری‌‌ایرانی. ‌تهران:‌ سرو‌ش دانش.
5. - رحمن‌پور، نسترن؛ و شهبازی، مجید، (1395). «بررسی کاربرد چوب در معماری ایران (قبل و بعد از اسلام)». سومین کنفرانس علمی پژوهشی افق‌های نوین در علوم جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی معماری و شهرسازی ایران، تهران.
6. - رحیم‌زاده، معصومه، (1372). «سقانفارها، نوعی معماری آئینی». نشریۀ وقف میراث جاویدان، 5: 136-132.
7. - رحیم‌زاده، معصومه، (1382). سقاتالارهای مازندران. تهران: انتشارات سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
8. - رحیم‌زاده، معصومه، (1383). سقاتالارهای مازندران، منطقۀ بابل، وجهی از معماری آئینی. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
9. - رفیعی، زهرا، (1390). «روند تحولات نفار در معماری بومی مازندران». باغ نظر، 8 (19): 64-55. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_720.html?lang=fa
10. - زمرشیدی‌‌‌، حسین،‌‌‌ ‌‌(1373)‌‌. ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌معماری ‌‌ایران مصالح‌شناسی سنتی. ‌تهران: ‌زمرد.
11. - شیرازی، زهره، (1397). «مطالعات زغال‌شناسی در غار علی‌تپۀ مازندران: درآمدی بر منابع گیاهی در دوران فراپارینه‌سنگی در البرز شرقی». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 8 (18): 24-7. DOI: 10.22084/NBSH.2018.13417.1586
12. - صفدری، وحیدرضا؛ حمصی، سیدامیرهومن؛ و حسینی‌هاشمی، سیدخلیل، (1386). «کلید شناسایی 10 گونه از مهم‌ترین چوب‌های بخش روزنه‌ای شمال ایران با کمک لنز». علوم کشاورزی، 13 (4): 991-973.
13. - صفدری، وحیدرضا؛ و گلچین‌فر، میثم، (1390). «مقایسۀ آناتومی چوب‌های ملج، اوجا، آزاد و داغداغان به‌منظور شناسایی آن‌ها از یکدیگر». ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ تحقیقات علوم چوب و کاغذ ایران، 26 (3): 578-564. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwpr.2011.117237
14. - عزیزپور‌شوبی، عارف؛ هاشم‌پور، پریسا؛ و نژاد‌ابراهیمی، احد، (1400). «جستاری بر شناخت زمینۀ فرهنگی معماری از نفار تا سقانفار». فصلنامۀ پژوهش‌های معماری اسلامی، 9(2): 60-39. 10.52547/jria.9.2.39
15. - کاظمی، سیدمحمود؛ عنایتی، علی‌اکبر؛ و رحیمیان، حشمت‌الله، (1382). «ارتباط بین مواد استخراجی چوب و پوسیدگی قارچی». تحقیقات علوم چوب و کاغذ ایران، 18 (2): 154-132. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwpr.2003.117542
16. - کریمی، زهره، (1399). «بررسی سیستماتیک تشریح چوب برخی گونه‌های تیرۀ راش با تفسیر اکولوژیک». رستنی‌ها، 21(1): 13-1. DOI: 10.22092/BOTANY.2019.127289.1166
17. - کلانتر، علی‌اصغر، (1399). «کارکردشناسی تحلیلی سقانفارهای مازندران براساس مضامین تزئینات با رویکرد ادبیات تعلیمی». نگره، 56: 78-71. DOI: 10.22070/NEGAREH.2020.3122
18. - محمودی‌، فتانه، (١٣٩0). «بررسی مضامین تصویری هنر دورۀ قاجار در نقوش سقانفارهای مازندران». نشریۀ هنرهای زیبا، 36: 76-67.
19. - معماریان، غلامحسین؛ و پیرزاد، احمد، (۱۳۹۱). «نگاهی به معماری بومی سقانفارها». صفه، 58: 44-29.
20. - ملکی‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌گلندو‌ز‌‌‌،‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ مصطفی؛ ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌و حسینخانی‌‌‌، ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌حسین، (1392). «‌‌‌‌‌‌‌شناسایی و تشخیص چوب‌های منبر تاریخی مشکو‌ل»‌‌‌. نشریۀ الکترونیکی آستان قدس، 5 (19): 1-12. https://shamseh.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_59859.html
21. - وولف، هانس، (1384). صنایع‌دستی کهن ایران. ترجمۀ سیروس ابراهیم‌زاده، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
22. - یوسف‌نیا پاشا‌، وحید‌، (1385). «فضاهای نال و ستون‌دار در معماری مازندران». مجلۀ آبادی، 50: 97-87.
24. - Ahmadi, H.; Poortagmasebi, L. & Mohammadi Achachluei, M., (2018). “Wood Identification of Structural Elements of Seven Historical Buildings Related to Safavid and Qajar Periods”. Maremat & Me’mari-e Iran, 8 (15): 107-118. DOR: 20.1001.1.23453850.1397.8.15.1.6 (In Persian). URL: https://mmi.aui.ac.ir/article-1-161-en.html
25. - Azizpour shoubi, A.; Hashempour, P. & Nezhad ebrahimi, A., (2021). “The Inquiry to Identify the Cultural Contex of Architecture from Nefar to Saqa-Nefar”. JRIA, 9 (2) :39-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jria.9.2.39 (In Persian).
26. - Blair, Sh. S. & Jonathan M, B., (2009). The Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art and Architecture: Mosul to Zirid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. - Browicz, K., (1982). Chorology of Trees and Shrubs in South-West Asia and Adjacent Regions. Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsawa.
28. - Cai, W.; Cheng, Y. K.; Tseng, H. H.; Tai, H. C. & Lo, S. F., (2022). “Identification and Characterization of Wood from Antique Chinese Guqin Zithers”. Journal Of Cultural Heritage, 53: 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.11.005
29. - Čufar, K.; Bizjak, M.; Kuzman, M. K.; Merela, M.; Grabner, M. & Brus, R., (2014). “Castle Pišece, Slovenia–Building History and Wood Economy Revealed by Dendrochronology, Dendroprovenancing and Historical Sources”. Dendrochronologia, 32(4): 357-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2014.08.002.
30. - Davoodi, A. & Davoodi, A., (2013). “Considering the Role of Wood and Timber Roof in Persepolis Architecture”. Advanced Materials Research, 778: 11-18. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.778.11 (In Persian).
31. - Djamali, M.; Chaverdi, A. A.; Balatti, S.; Guibal, F. & Santelli, C., (2017). “On the Chronology and Use of Timber in the Palaces and Palace-Like Structures of the Sasanian Empire in “Persis”(SW Iran)”. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 12: 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.030
32. - Hueto-Escobar, A.; Vegas López-Manzanares, F. & Mileto C., (2023).“Microscopic Identification of 24 Timber Samples Obtained from Half-Timber Walls in Northern Spain—Considerations on the Relationship Between Species and Constructive Needs”. Forests, 14(2): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020352
33. - Hwang, K.; Park, B. S.; Park, J. H. & Chong, S. H., (2009). “Identification of Wood Used for Column Members of Historic Korean Timber Structures”. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 8(2): 525-529. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.8.525
34. - Kalantar, A. A., (2020). “Analytical Study of the Function of Mazandaran Saqanefars Based on Themes of Decorations with an Educational Literature Approach”. Negareh Journal, 15(56): 71-87. doi:10.22070/negareh.2020.3122 (In Persian).
35. - Karimi, Z., (2020). “A Systematic Study of the Wood Anatomy of Some Species of The Fagaceae Family with an Ecological Interpretation”. Rostaniha, 21(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.22092/botany.2019.127289.1166 (In Persian).
36. - Kazemi, S. M.; Enayati, A. & Rahymian, H., (2003). “Relationship Between Wood Extractives and Wood Decay”. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 18(2): 139-154. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwpr.2003.117542 (In Persian).
37. - Kim, S. C. & Choi, J., (2016). “Study on Wood Species Identification for Daeungjeon Hall of Jeonghyesa Temple, Suncheon”. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology, 44(6): 897-902. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.6.897
38. - Kristjansdottir, S.; Lazzeri, S. & Macchioni, N., (2001). “An Icelandic Medieval Stave Church Made of Drift Timber: The Implications of the Wood Identification”. Journal Of Cultural Heritage, 2(2): 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(01)01112-8
39. - Lee, H. M. & Bae, J. S., (2021). “Major Species and Anatomical Characteristics of the Wood Used for National Use Specified in Yeonggeon-Uigwes of the Late Joseon Dynasty Period”. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology, 49(5): 462-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2021.49.5.462
40. - Memarian, G. & Pirzad, A., (2013). “The Architecture of Saqqa-Nefar Structures”. Soffeh, 22(3): 29-44. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100158.html?lang=en (In Persian).
41. - Mertz, M., (2016). Wood and Traditional Woodworking in Japan. Kaiseisha Press.
42. - Mohammadi Achachluei, M. & Vatankhah, G., (2011). “Structural Degradation of Third Millennium B.C.E. Archaeological Wood from Shahr-i Sukhta, Iran”. MRS Online Proceedings Library: 1319.
43. - Oladi, R.; Niarami, T. S.; Zarea Hosseinabadi, H. & Rostami, M., (2022). “Superior Properties of Timbers Used in the Art of Chutashi (Traditional Wooden Kitchen Utensils in the north Of Iran)”. Forest and Wood Products, 75(2): 155-167. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfwp.2021.333179.1193 (In Persian).
44. - Omura, H., (2004). “Trees, Forests and Religion in Japan”. Mountain Research and Development, 24(2): 179-182. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2004)024[0179:TFARIJ]2.0.CO;2
45. - Rafiee, Z., (2012). “Transformation Process of "Nefar" in Vernacular Architecture of Mazandaran”. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 8(19): 55-64. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_720.html?lang=en (In Persian).
46. - Rybníček, M.; Kočár, P.; Muigg, B.; Peška, J.; Sedláček, R.; Tegel, W. & Kolář, T., (2020), “World's Oldest Dendrochronologically Dated Archaeological Wood Construction”. Journal of Archaeological Science, 115: 105082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105082
47. - Safdari, V. R. & Golchinfar, M., (2011). “Comparative Wood Anatomy Oof Wych Elm, English Elm, Caucasian Elm and Hackberry”. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Science Research, 26(3): 564-578. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwpr.2011.117237 (In Persian).
48. - Shirazi, Z., (2018). “Charcoal Studies at Ali Tappeh Cave (Mazandaran): An Introduction to the Herbal Sources in the Epipaleolithic Period in the Eastern Alborz”. Pazhoheshha-ye Bastan Shenasi Iran, 8(18): 7-24. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2018.13417.1586 (In Persian).
49. - Tazuru, S. & Sugiyama, J., (2019). “Wood Identification of Japanese Shinto Deity Statues in Matsunoo-Taisha Shrine in Kyoto by Synchrotron X-Ray Microtomography and Conventional Microscopy Methods”. Journal of Wood Science, 65(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-019-1840-2
50. - Wheeler, E. A.; Baas, P. & Gasson P. E, (1989). “IAWA List of Microscopic Features for Hardwood Identification”. IAWA Journal, 10(3): 219–332. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000496

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.