year 7, Issue 25 (12-2023)
Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2023, 7(25): 389-416 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dadpour S, Kharabati S, Rahimi M. (2023). Identifying Architectural Types of Historical Houses and Their Sustainability Assessment Using Analytic Network Process (ANP): A Case Study of Yase Chai Village, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 7(25), 389-416. doi:10.30699/PJAS.7.25.389
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-786-en.html
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-786-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Shahrood, Iran , srdadpour@shahroodut.ac.ir
2- Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Shahrood, Iran
3- Bachelor of Architecture, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Shahrood, Iran.
2- Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Shahrood, Iran
3- Bachelor of Architecture, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Shahrood, Iran.
Abstract: (2802 Views)
Abstract
The risk of deterioration and destruction threatens valuable traditional housing in the historical texture of villages. Identifying the architectural types of historical houses and analyzing their sustainability are necessary to protect traditional architectural values and use them in contemporary housing designs. While there are many studies on the typology of traditional houses and the sustainability of rural housing, the analysis of architectural types of houses has been less considered. Also, the architectural types of the valuable houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village have not been still extracted and analyzed. Therefore, the main research questions are, what are the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai Village? And what is the priority of the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai village regarding sustainability? This study also aims to identify the architectural types of houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village, Chaharmahal, and Bakhtiari Province and to prioritize them based on sustainability. The rural housing sustainability indicators were extracted to achieve the purpose of the research, first by reviewing research and using the qualitative content analysis method. Then, the similarities and differences of the houses in terms of macro-, meso-, and micro-scale characteristics were examined and based on them, six types were identified. In the next step, the identified housing types were compared and ranked based on sustainability using the analytical network process (ANP) method. The dominant architectural type of the village’s historical texture with the highest frequency has the third-highest rank for sustainability. According to the results, the greater frequency of a particular architectural type in a historical context does not necessarily indicate a preference for using that type in the construction of contemporary houses. In addition, the form and manner of establishing the living spaces and their porches on the first floor, and the number and length of the yards were the most important architectural features that distinguished the types from each other. To improve the sustainability of types and use them in contemporary housing designs, suggestions have been presented, such as granting financial facilities to create living spaces in historical houses and checking the compatibility of the rules of the village guidance [Hadi] plan with the architectural types of housing.
Keywords: Architectural Type, Valuable Historical Texture, Sustainability of Rural Housing, Qajar Era, ANP.
Introduction
Although the historical texture of Yase Chai village is registered in the list of national monuments, the architectural types of the houses have not been extracted and analyzed. Meanwhile, the new houses in the village are built without considering the architectural values of its historical texture. Also, the protection and use of sustainable architectural types of historical houses can bring about a tourism boom. This study aims to identify and prioritize architectural housing types in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village based on sustainability.
Research questions: What are the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai Village? And what is the priority of the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai village regarding sustainability?
Research method: The statistical society included all the houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai. Purposeful sampling was used and 10 prominent houses were selected as representatives of the existing valuable houses of historical texture. Identifying the architectural characteristics of each house was done in three dimensions. Then, the partial types of each characteristic were extracted by comparing and examining the similarities and differences between the samples. Six final types were obtained in the next step based on partial types. In the third step, the types were ranked based on the sustainability of rural houses through the analytic network process (ANP).
Rural Housing Sustainability Components
The components of rural housing sustainability and their criteria include physical-environmental (environmental cleanliness, harmony with nature, and climatic comfort), physical-functional (flexibility, safety, and inclusiveness), physical-aesthetic (visual proportion and vernacular identity, and sensory richness), economic (livelihood and economic costs) and socio-cultural (lifestyle and privacy).
Architectural Characteristics of Houses
Living spaces had southwest and southeast lighting. The average ratio of mass to the land area of houses is 0.8. The dominant type of the mass shape is the central courtyard. The average ratio of length to width of the main courtyards is 1.79. The average percentage ratio of open, semi-open, and closed spaces to total spaces is 18, 19, and 63%, respectively. Most of the houses (70%) had direct access from the living room to the kitchen. On the main facades, the ratio of the area of the openings to the total area of the facade on the first floor was more than twice that of the ground floor. The average minimum width of the porches in the houses was 1.8 meters, which shows the flexibility of the porches.
Final Types of Historical Houses
Six final types were extracted. Type 1, with a frequency of 50%, is the dominant type. The first floor is L-shaped and receives southwest and southeast light. In type 2, the first floor receives light from the southwest, southeast, and northeast directions and has a U shape. In type three, the first floor gets southwest and northwest light; in type four, it gets southwest and northeast light. In type 4, the forms of the first floor are two opposite rectangles. In type 5, the form of the first floor is an incomplete U, and its light is from the southwest, southeast, and northwest. Type 6 is physically a combination of types 1 and 4.
Analysis and Ranking of Types
The most sustainable types and their scores are four (0.195), six (0.176), one (0.171), five (0.164), two (0.159), and three (0.134). Therefore, the fourth type is the most appropriate type to use in the contemporary housing designs of Yase Chai. In types four, five, and six, where a part of the first floor is separate from other parts of the first floor, there is a potential to use the separate part of the first floor as a living space for tourists and increase the level of livelihood. The types one and five have fewer facades with openings than other types, increasing climate comfort. The type one is also preferable to others in terms of view control from the entrance to the courtyard. There are two courtyards separated from each other in type six, which helps to provide more privacy.
Conclusion
In this research in the first step, houses of the historical texture of Yase Chai village were investigated in terms of macro (orientation and lighting, characteristics of mass and form, characteristics of courtyards and structures, and materials), meso (system of open, semi-open, and closed spaces, functions, interior spaces, and facades), and micro-architectural characteristics (entrance, porch, and portico, and details of the building) and their partial types were extracted. In the second step, based on the partial types, six final types were obtained. Sun exposure, the form and manner of establishing the living spaces and their porches, and the features of the yards were the most important factors that distinguished the types from each other. In the third step, the types were ranked based on the physical-environmental, physical-functional, physical-aesthetic, economic, and social-cultural components and their subset criteria and indicators using the analytical network process method.
It is suggested to grant financial facilities to strengthen the structure and create living spaces in historical houses. It is also suggested to revise the rules of the village guidance plan and check their compatibility with the architectural types of the historical housing. For example, with the condition of providing proper lighting and ventilation of the interior spaces and coordinating the new designs with sustainable types, the maximum occupancy level should be increased from 60% to 80%. In addition, it is suggested to allocate financial facilities to implement new housing projects with the condition of coordination with the architectural types of the village. The results of the current study demonstrated that the greater frequency of a particular architectural type in a historical context does not necessarily indicate a preference for using that type in the construction of contemporary houses.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to the kind residents who allowed us to visit and document their houses. This research did not receive any specific grant.
Observation Contribution
Sara Dadpour designed the concept and wrote the draft of the article, except for the research background and theoretical foundations. Sajede Kharabati wrote the research background and theoretical foundations and contributed to writing the introduction. Mozhdeh Rahimi conducted field visits and documented the houses. Mozhdeh Rahimi prepared the houses’ plans and 3D visualizations and contributed to the analysis of the architectural features of the houses. The authors’ contributions percentage is Sara Dadpour at 45%, Sajede Kharabati at 25%, and Mozhdeh Rahimi at 30%. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The risk of deterioration and destruction threatens valuable traditional housing in the historical texture of villages. Identifying the architectural types of historical houses and analyzing their sustainability are necessary to protect traditional architectural values and use them in contemporary housing designs. While there are many studies on the typology of traditional houses and the sustainability of rural housing, the analysis of architectural types of houses has been less considered. Also, the architectural types of the valuable houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village have not been still extracted and analyzed. Therefore, the main research questions are, what are the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai Village? And what is the priority of the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai village regarding sustainability? This study also aims to identify the architectural types of houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village, Chaharmahal, and Bakhtiari Province and to prioritize them based on sustainability. The rural housing sustainability indicators were extracted to achieve the purpose of the research, first by reviewing research and using the qualitative content analysis method. Then, the similarities and differences of the houses in terms of macro-, meso-, and micro-scale characteristics were examined and based on them, six types were identified. In the next step, the identified housing types were compared and ranked based on sustainability using the analytical network process (ANP) method. The dominant architectural type of the village’s historical texture with the highest frequency has the third-highest rank for sustainability. According to the results, the greater frequency of a particular architectural type in a historical context does not necessarily indicate a preference for using that type in the construction of contemporary houses. In addition, the form and manner of establishing the living spaces and their porches on the first floor, and the number and length of the yards were the most important architectural features that distinguished the types from each other. To improve the sustainability of types and use them in contemporary housing designs, suggestions have been presented, such as granting financial facilities to create living spaces in historical houses and checking the compatibility of the rules of the village guidance [Hadi] plan with the architectural types of housing.
Keywords: Architectural Type, Valuable Historical Texture, Sustainability of Rural Housing, Qajar Era, ANP.
Introduction
Although the historical texture of Yase Chai village is registered in the list of national monuments, the architectural types of the houses have not been extracted and analyzed. Meanwhile, the new houses in the village are built without considering the architectural values of its historical texture. Also, the protection and use of sustainable architectural types of historical houses can bring about a tourism boom. This study aims to identify and prioritize architectural housing types in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village based on sustainability.
Research questions: What are the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai Village? And what is the priority of the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai village regarding sustainability?
Research method: The statistical society included all the houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai. Purposeful sampling was used and 10 prominent houses were selected as representatives of the existing valuable houses of historical texture. Identifying the architectural characteristics of each house was done in three dimensions. Then, the partial types of each characteristic were extracted by comparing and examining the similarities and differences between the samples. Six final types were obtained in the next step based on partial types. In the third step, the types were ranked based on the sustainability of rural houses through the analytic network process (ANP).
Rural Housing Sustainability Components
The components of rural housing sustainability and their criteria include physical-environmental (environmental cleanliness, harmony with nature, and climatic comfort), physical-functional (flexibility, safety, and inclusiveness), physical-aesthetic (visual proportion and vernacular identity, and sensory richness), economic (livelihood and economic costs) and socio-cultural (lifestyle and privacy).
Architectural Characteristics of Houses
Living spaces had southwest and southeast lighting. The average ratio of mass to the land area of houses is 0.8. The dominant type of the mass shape is the central courtyard. The average ratio of length to width of the main courtyards is 1.79. The average percentage ratio of open, semi-open, and closed spaces to total spaces is 18, 19, and 63%, respectively. Most of the houses (70%) had direct access from the living room to the kitchen. On the main facades, the ratio of the area of the openings to the total area of the facade on the first floor was more than twice that of the ground floor. The average minimum width of the porches in the houses was 1.8 meters, which shows the flexibility of the porches.
Final Types of Historical Houses
Six final types were extracted. Type 1, with a frequency of 50%, is the dominant type. The first floor is L-shaped and receives southwest and southeast light. In type 2, the first floor receives light from the southwest, southeast, and northeast directions and has a U shape. In type three, the first floor gets southwest and northwest light; in type four, it gets southwest and northeast light. In type 4, the forms of the first floor are two opposite rectangles. In type 5, the form of the first floor is an incomplete U, and its light is from the southwest, southeast, and northwest. Type 6 is physically a combination of types 1 and 4.
Analysis and Ranking of Types
The most sustainable types and their scores are four (0.195), six (0.176), one (0.171), five (0.164), two (0.159), and three (0.134). Therefore, the fourth type is the most appropriate type to use in the contemporary housing designs of Yase Chai. In types four, five, and six, where a part of the first floor is separate from other parts of the first floor, there is a potential to use the separate part of the first floor as a living space for tourists and increase the level of livelihood. The types one and five have fewer facades with openings than other types, increasing climate comfort. The type one is also preferable to others in terms of view control from the entrance to the courtyard. There are two courtyards separated from each other in type six, which helps to provide more privacy.
Conclusion
In this research in the first step, houses of the historical texture of Yase Chai village were investigated in terms of macro (orientation and lighting, characteristics of mass and form, characteristics of courtyards and structures, and materials), meso (system of open, semi-open, and closed spaces, functions, interior spaces, and facades), and micro-architectural characteristics (entrance, porch, and portico, and details of the building) and their partial types were extracted. In the second step, based on the partial types, six final types were obtained. Sun exposure, the form and manner of establishing the living spaces and their porches, and the features of the yards were the most important factors that distinguished the types from each other. In the third step, the types were ranked based on the physical-environmental, physical-functional, physical-aesthetic, economic, and social-cultural components and their subset criteria and indicators using the analytical network process method.
It is suggested to grant financial facilities to strengthen the structure and create living spaces in historical houses. It is also suggested to revise the rules of the village guidance plan and check their compatibility with the architectural types of the historical housing. For example, with the condition of providing proper lighting and ventilation of the interior spaces and coordinating the new designs with sustainable types, the maximum occupancy level should be increased from 60% to 80%. In addition, it is suggested to allocate financial facilities to implement new housing projects with the condition of coordination with the architectural types of the village. The results of the current study demonstrated that the greater frequency of a particular architectural type in a historical context does not necessarily indicate a preference for using that type in the construction of contemporary houses.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to the kind residents who allowed us to visit and document their houses. This research did not receive any specific grant.
Observation Contribution
Sara Dadpour designed the concept and wrote the draft of the article, except for the research background and theoretical foundations. Sajede Kharabati wrote the research background and theoretical foundations and contributed to writing the introduction. Mozhdeh Rahimi conducted field visits and documented the houses. Mozhdeh Rahimi prepared the houses’ plans and 3D visualizations and contributed to the analysis of the architectural features of the houses. The authors’ contributions percentage is Sara Dadpour at 45%, Sajede Kharabati at 25%, and Mozhdeh Rahimi at 30%. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: Architectural Type, Valuable Historical Texture, Sustainability of Rural Housing, Qajar Era, ANP.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Interdisciplinary
Received: 2022/07/31 | Accepted: 2022/09/23 | Published: 2023/12/3
Received: 2022/07/31 | Accepted: 2022/09/23 | Published: 2023/12/3
References
1. - ابراهیمی، غلامرضا؛ سلطانزاده، حسین؛ و میرشاهزاده، شروین، (1395). «تأثیر نوگرایی سبک زندگی در معماری خانههای دورۀ پهلوی اول، شهر همدان». مدیریت شهری، 16 (47): 522-505. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-1786-fa.html
2. - ادارۀ کل هواشناسی استان چهارمحالوبختیاری (1401). http://chbmet.ir/c3.asp
3. - اکبری، حسن؛ بابازاده، مهدی؛ و کلویر، حجتالله رشید، (1399). «گونهشناسی ساختار کالبدی-فضایی معماری مسکن روستایی دره شاهرود شهرستان خلخال». علوم و محیطزیست تکنولوژی، 22 (10): 158-149. DOI: 10.22034/JEST.2021.40935.4514
4. - امیری، ابراهیم، (1393). مقدمهای بر شناخت مساکن و سکونتگاههای روستایی در ایران. بجنورد: جهانی.
5. - بذرافشان، جواد؛ شایان، محسن؛ و بازوند، سجاد، (1396). «ارزیابی عوامل تأثیرگذار پایداری مسکن در مناطق روستایی شهرستان زریندشت». جغرافیا و برنامهریزی، 21 (62): 59-41. https://journals.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_7281.html
6. - بسحاق، محمدرضا؛ سالاروند، اسماعیل؛ و تبریزی، جلال، (1393). «تحلیلی بر شاخصهای پایداری مسکن در مناطق روستایی (مطالعۀ موردی: دهستان سیلاخور شرقی-شهرستان ازنا)». جغرافیا و برنامهریزی محیطی، 25 (2): 208-191. https://gep.ui.ac.ir/article_18654.html
7. - بسحاق، محمدرضا؛ تقدیسی، احمد؛ امرایی، علیآقا؛ و دانش، کمال، (1395). «تحلیلی بر نقش عوامل مؤثر بر پایداری مسکن در مناطق روستایی ایران (مطالعۀ موردی: دهستان ملاوی شهرستان پلدختر)». مسکن و محیط روستا. 35 (154): ۱۳۴-۱۲۵. https://jhre.ir/article-1-449-fa.html
8. - بیمکر، فرزانه؛ میرزایی، رضا؛ مداحی، سیدمهدی؛ و حیدری، احمد، (1399). «گونهشناسی الگوهای معاصر مسکن روستایی و ارتباط آن با اقلیم (مطالعۀ موردی: روستای کَنگ مشهد)». مطالعات فرهنگی اجتماعی خراسان، 15 (1): 30-7. https://doi.org/10.22034/fakh.2021.226541.1398
9. - پوردیهیمی، شهرام، (1390). «فرهنگ و مسکن». مسکن و محیط روستا، 30 (134): 18-۳. https://jhre.ir/article-1-2-fa.html&sw=
10. - پورطاهری، مهدی؛ فضلعلی، زینب؛ و رکنالدینافتخاری، عبدالرضا، (1396). «تحلیل فضایی الگوی مسکن پایدار روستایی (مطالعۀ موردی: روستاهای استان مازندران)». برنامهریزی و آمایش فضا. 21 (1): 131-95. http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-10901-fa.html
11. - پیرنیا، محمدکریم، (1387). سبکشناسی معماری ایرانی. تهران: انتشارات سروش دانش.
12. - جمشیدیان، سلیمه؛ و چقاجردی، ایمان، (1393). «شناسایی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر توسعۀ گردشگری روستایی با استفاده از مدل SWOT (مطالعۀ موردی: روستای یاسهچای)». جغرافیایی فضای گردشگری، 3 (12): 56-45. https://www.sid.ir/paper/214244/fa
13. - حسینی، کوثر؛ فروزانی، معصومه؛ و عبدشاهی، عباس، (1400). «بررسی رابطۀ بین پایداری اقتصادی و اجتماعی روستاییان و برخورداری از تنوع معیشتی». علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران. 17 (2): 27-11. https://www.iaeej.ir/article_145047.html
14. - حسینینیا، سیدمهدی؛ حاجیزادهباستانی، کریم؛ شهبازیشیران، حبیب؛ رضالو، رضا؛ و شیداییسولا، شاهرخ، (1399). «گونهشناسی خانههای تاریخی در بافت قدیم شهر اردبیل». پژوهشهای باستانشناسی ایران، 10 (26): 241-189. https://www.sid.ir/paper/386801/fa
15. - خدابندهلو، زهره؛ و خرمشاهی، مریم، (1387). «بازشناسی زیبایی در مسکن روستایی». آبادی، 60: 33-26. https://gep.ui.ac.ir/article_25580.html
16. - خراباتی، ساجده؛ و ابراهیمیان، نسترن، (1400). «بررسی و تحلیل مشخصههای کالبدی-عملکردی در مسکن روستایی (نمونۀ موردی: روستای گرمن شاهرود)». معماری اقلیم گرم و خشک، 9 (4): 241-223. “https://doi.org/10.29252/ahdc.2021.16935.1567” 10.29252/AHDC.2021.16935.1567
17. - خراباتی، ساجده؛ و شیرازی، پروانه، (1400). «دستیابی به الگوی طراحی مسکن روستایی؛ مطالعۀ موردی: روستای طزره دامغان». مسکن و محیط روستا، 40 (175): ۱۸-۳. https://doi.org/10.29252/ahdc.2021.16935.1567”10.29252/AHDC.2021.16935.1567
18. - رستمیزاده، محسن، (1393). «طرح هادی روستای یاسهچای». چهارمحال و بختیاری: مرکز اسناد بنیاد مسکن انقلاب اسلامی استان چهارمحال و بختیاری.
19. - زبردست، اسفندیار، (1389). «کاربرد فرآیند تحلیل شبکهای (ANP) در برنامهریزی شهری و منطقهای». هنرهای زیبا، 22 (41): 90-79. https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_22270_383899d5bdcaec9ef5544e1ec3e3f6bd.pdf
20. - زندیه، مهدی؛ و حصاری، پدرام، (1391). « تداوم معماری مسکن روستایی با انگیزه توسعه پایدار روستایی». مسکن و محیط روستا، 31 (138): ۷۲-۶۳. http://jhre.ir/article-1-166-fa.html
21. - زندیه، مهدی؛ اقبالی، سیدرحمان؛ و حصاری، پدرام، (1390). «روشهای طراحی مسکن انعطافپذیر». نقش جهان-مطالعات نظری و فناوری های نوین معماری و شهرسازی، 1 (1): ۱۰۶-۹۵.
22. - زیاری، سمیه؛ فرهودی، رحمتالله؛ پوراحمد، احمد؛ و حاتمینژاد، حسین، (1397). «بررسی و تحلیل مسکن پایدار در شهر کرج». جغرافیا و توسعه، 16 (52): 156-141. DOI: 10.22111/GDIJ.2018.4119
23. - سرتیپیپور، محسن، (1384). «شاخصهای معماری مسکن روستایی در ایران». هنرهای زیبا، 22 (22): 52-43. https://jhz.ut.ac.ir/article_10737.html
24. - سرتیپیپور، محسن، (1388). «بررسی تحلیلی مسکن روستایی در ایران». صفه، 19 (1): 60-47. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100118.html
25. - سرتیپیپور، محسن، (1389). «ارزیابی و تحلیل مسکن روستایی استان سیستان و بلوچستان و پیشنهاد جهتگیری آتی». انجمن جغرافیای ایران، 8 (27): 135-96. https://mag.iga.ir/article_704422.html
26. - سعیدی، عباس؛ و امینی، فریبا، (1389). «ناپایداری سکونتگاهی و تحول کارکردی مسکن روستایی: مورد روستای خفر ناحیه نطنز-بادرود». انجمن جغرافیای ایران، 8 (27): 43-29. https://mag.iga.ir/article_704418.html
27. - سناییمقدم، سروش؛ و محمدییگانه، بهروز، (1396). «تحلیل عوامل مؤثر در پایداری مسکن روستایی مطالعۀ موردی: سکونتگاههای روستایی بخش چاروسا». شهرستان کهگیلویه، اندیشه جغرافیا، 8 (16): 144-119. https://geonot.znu.ac.ir/article_25846.html
28. - شاهقلیان، فرهاد، (1390). «پروندۀ ثبتی بافت تاریخی روستای یاسهچای». شهرکرد: مرکز اسناد اداره کل میراثفرهنگی صنایعدستی و گردشگری استان چهارمحالوبختیاری (منتشرنشده).
29. - شفایی، مینو؛ و مدنی، رامین، (1390). «تبیین روش تحقیق زمینهیابی در طراحی الگوی مسکن روستایی». معماری و شهرسازی آرمانشهر، 4 (7): 30-17. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_32679.html
30. - صدیقیان، حسین؛ نیکزاد، میثم؛ اشنویینوشآبادی، امیر؛ و قاسمی، الهام، (1399). «تأثیر شرایط اقلیمی بر ساختار و اجزای معماری خانههای سنتی منطقۀ گرم و خشک شهرستان خوسف، خراسان جنوبی». مطالعات باستانشناسی پارسه، 4 (14): 146-125. https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.4.14.125
31. - سادات، سیدهاشرف؛ ضرغامی، اسماعیل؛ و خاکی، علی، (1394). «بررسی تطبیقی معماری پایدار و مطابقت آن با معماری بومی خانههای سنتی در شهر ایرانی-اسلامی». معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 3 (1): 30-15. https://journals.sru.ac.ir/article_697.html
32. - طاهریسرمد، فائزه؛ عینیفر، علیرضا؛ و شاهچراغی، آزاده، (1398). «مقایسه تطبیقی گونهشناسی سازمان فضایی و عناصر کالبدی دورههای قاجار و پهلوی خانههای سنتی شهر کرمانشاه». پژوهشهای باستانشناسی ایران، 9 (23): 168-149. 10.22084/NBSH.2019.18444.1895
33. - علیالحسابی، مهران، (1381). «لزوم نگرش نوین در توسعه و عمران روستایی». مسکن و محیط روستا، 100: 23-14. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100118.html
34. - عنابستانی، علیاکبر؛ بهزادی، صدیقه؛ و انزایی، الهه، (1397). «بررسی تأثیرپذیری الگوی مسکن روستایی از سبک زندگی روستاییان در شهرستان نکا». آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 8 (27): 52-35. https://gps.gu.ac.ir/article_65968.html
35. - عینیفر، علیرضا، (1382). «الگویی برای تحلیل انعطافپذیری در مسکن سنتی ایران». هنرهای زیبا، 13 (13): 77-64. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_10660.html
36. - غفاری، سید رامین؛ مدبر، معصومه؛ و ریاحیزانیانی، زینب، (1387). «مونوگرافی مسکن و معماری روستای یاسهچای». مسکن و محیط روستا، 122: 51-42. https://www.sid.ir/paper/214244/fa
37. - قدیریمعصوم، مجتبی؛ حجیپور، محمد؛ و روستا، محمدامین، (1393). «آسیبشناسی الگوی جدید مساکن روستایی از منظر توسعه پایدار (مورد: دهستان شوسف در شهرستان نهبندان)». برنامهریزی فضایی، 4 (3): 14-1. https://sppl.ui.ac.ir/article_16009.html
38. - قربی، میترا؛ نقوی، مریم؛ و محمدی، حمید، (1398). «تأثیر محیط ساختهشده بر سرمایه اجتماعی و پایداری اجتماعی در بافت تاریخی (نمونۀ موردی: محلات همپیوند با بازار در بافت تاریخی کرمان)». مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 6 (21): 84-59. https://shahr.journals.umz.ac.ir/article_2394.html
39. - قنبری، نوذر، (1389). «تحلیل نگرش روستائیان به مسکن ایدهآل (مطالعۀ موردی: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان کرمانشاه)». جغرافیایی سرزمین، 7 (28): 78-65. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_5380.html
40. - قیومیبیدهندی، مهرداد؛ و عبداللهزاده، محمدمهدی، (1400). «بام و بوم و مردم (بازخوانی و نقد اصول پیشنهادی پیرنیا برای معماری ایرانی)». مطالعات معماری ایران، 1 (1): 23-7. https://jias.kashanu.ac.ir/article_111693.html?lang=fa
41. - کریمی، مهشید، (1396). «مسکن خوانشپذیر تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر خوانشپذیری مسکن در جهت ارتقای پیوند ساکن و مسکن». معماری اقلیم گرم و خشک، 5 (5): 50-33. 10.29252/SMB.5.5.33
42. - گلکار، کورش، (1390). آفرینش مکان پایدار: تأملاتی در باب نظریه طراحی شهری. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی.
43. - ملکیزاده، بهنوش؛ سروش، محمدمهدی؛ مولانایی، صلاحالدین؛ و فروتن، منوچهر، (1400). «مطالعه تطبیقی خانههای سنتی کرمانشاه و سنندج در دورۀ قاجار و پهلوی». نگرشهای نو در جغرافیای انسانی، 13 (3): 966-946. https://geography.garmsar.iau.ir/article_682644.html
44. - محمدییگانه، بهروز؛ سناییمقدم، سروش؛ و چراغی، مهدی؛ (1396). «پایداری مسکن روستایی برمبنای تحلیل اطلاعات متقابل، نمونۀ موردی: دهستان پشتهزیلایی شهرستان پرام». برنامهریزی توسعه کالبدی، 4 (1): 108-91. https://psp.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_3830.html
45. - محمودی، محمدمهدی؛ و نیکقدم، نیلوفر، (1387). «کاهش آلودگیهای محیطی ناشی از توسعه مسکن با راهکارهای طراحی معماری (مطالعۀ موردی بافتهای مسکونی پیرامون تهران)». هنرهای زیبا، 35: 38-27. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_27119.html
46. - مرکز آمار ایران، (1401). سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن/نتایج سرشماری/جمعیت به تفکیک تقسیمات کشوری 1395/ https://amar.org.ir
47. - منصوری، کاوه؛ رحیمیکلهرودی، فرشید؛ و توکلی، سیدفرید، (1399). «گونهشناسی مسکن و تکنیکهای ساخت بومی در روستای تاریخی الگن». معماری اقلیم گرم و خشک، 8 (12): 61-43. 10.29252/AHDC.2021.15725.1468
48. - وثیق، بهزاد؛ و بذرافشان، مجتبی، (1399). «سنجش مفهوم پایداری در معماری مسکونی منطقۀ خراسان (نمونۀ موردی: خانههای سنتی بشرویه)». پژوهشنامه خراسان بزرگ، 10 (39): 32-17. 20.1001.1.22516131.1399.10.39.2.4
49. - هاشمنژاد، هاشم، و مولانایی، صلاحالدین، (1387). «معماری با نگاهی به آسمان: سکونتگاههای روستایی-ساختاری ویژه در معماری روستایی زاگرس (منطقۀ کردستان). هنرهای زیبا، 36 (0): 26-17. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_27345.html
50. - یوسفنیاپاشا، مجید؛ و برزگر، ماریا، (1397). «ارزیابی نقش و کارآیی رفاق (ایوان) از دیدگاه استفادهکنندگان: فضای نیمهباز در خانههای روستایی مازندران». مسکن و محیط روستا، 37 (161): 92-77. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:%2010.22034/37.161.77” DOI: 10.22034/37.161.77
52. - Ainifar, A., (2003). “A model for analysis of flexibility in traditional Iranian housing”. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, 13(13): 64-77. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_10660.html (In Persian)
53. - Akbari, H.; Babazadeh, M. & Kalvir, H., (2021). “Recognition of physical-spatial structure types in rural housing architecture Shahroud Valley, Khalkhal County”. J. Env. Sci. Tech., 22(10): 149-158. DOI: 10.22034/JEST.2021.40935.4514 (In Persian)
54. - Alalhesabi, M., (2002). “The need for a new approach in rural development and construction”. JHRE, 100: 14-23. magiran.com/p1272012 (In Persian)
55. - Amiri, E., (2014). An introduction to the recognition of houses and rural settlements in Iran. Bojnord: Gahani. https://journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_3830.html (In Persian)
56. - Anabestani, A., (2014). “Analysis of social change effects on the pattern of rural housing (Case study: Binalood County). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 3(1): 57-68. DOI: HYPERLINK “https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v3i5.25247” 10.22067/JRRP.V3I5.25247
57. - Anabestani, A.; Behzadi, S. & Anzaee, E., (2018). “Evaluate the effectiveness of rural housing model of rural lifestyle in Neka County”. Geographical Planning of Space, 8(27): 35-52. https://gps.gu.ac.ir/article_65968.html (In Persian)
58. - Bazrafshan, J.; Shayan, M. & Bazvand, S., (2018). “Assess the sustainability of in rural areas housing the township of Zarindasht)”. Geography and Planning, 21(62): 41-59. https://journals.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_7281.html (In Persian)
59. - Bimakr, F.; Mirzaie, R.; Madahi, M. & Heydari, A., (2020). “Typology of contemporary rural housing patterns and its relationship with climate A case study of Kang village”. Scientific Quarterly of Social-Cultural Studies of Khorasan, 15(1): 7-30. (In Persian)
60. - Boshagh, M. R.; Taghdisi, A.; Amraei, A. A. & Danesh, K., (2016). “An Analysis of Effective Factors in Perceived Sustainability of Housing in Rural Fabric (Case Study: Malavi Rural Area, Poldokhtar Township, Iran)”. JHRE, 35 (154): 125-134. https://jhre.ir/article-1-449-fa.html (In Persian)
61. - Boshagh, M.; Salarvand, E. & Tabrizi, J., (2014). “Analytical on housing indicators sustainability in a rural area (case study: Silakhor Sharghi rural district â Azna Township)”. Geography and Environmental Planning, 25(2): 191-208. https://gep.ui.ac.ir/article_18654.html (In Persian)
62. - Broome, J., (2005). “Mass housing cannot be sustained”. In: Peter Blundell Jones, Doina Petrescu, Jeremy Till (Eds.) Architecture and participation, London: Spon Press.
63. - Cameron, J. W., (2004). Measuring and reporting on sustainability: Beyond the triple bottom line. Published by the Victorian auditor general office.
64. - Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Meteorological Administration (2011). http://chbmet.ir/en/c3.asp
65. - Ebrahimi, G.; Soltanzadeh, H. & Mirshahzadeh, S., (2017). “The Impact of Modern Lifestyle on the Architecture of the Houses Built in Hamedan in the First Pahlavi Regime”. Urban Management, 16(47): 505-522. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-1786-fa.html (In Persian)
66. - Ghadiri-masoum, M.; Hajipour, M. & Rousta, M., (2014). “The Pathology of a new model of rural housing in terms of sustainable development (Case: Shusf district in Nehbandan County)”. Spatial Planning, 4(3): 1-14. https://sppl.ui.ac.ir/article_16009.html (In Persian)
67. - Ghafari, S. R.; Modaber, M. & Riahi, Z., (2008). “Housing and architecture monograph of Yaseh Chai village”. JHRE, 122: 42-51. https://www.sid.ir/paper/214244/fa (In Persian)
68. - Ghanbari, N., (2010). “The analysis of suitable housing in Villagers’ opinion Case study: Central District Villages of Kermanshah Township”. Territory, 7(28): 65-78. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_5380.html (In Persian)
69. - Ghorbi, M.; Naghavi, M. & Mohammadi, H., (2020). “The Effect of the Built Environment on Social Capital and Social Sustainability in Historical Context (Case Study: Linked Neighborhood to Bazar in Kerman Historical Fabric)”. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 6(21): 59-84. https://shahr.journals.umzac.ir/article_2394.html (In Persian)
70. - Golkar, K., (2011). Creating a sustainable place: Reflections on urban design theory. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. (In Persian)
71. - Hashemnejad, H. & Molanaii, S., (2008). “Architecture with a view towards the sky Rural Settlements – Especial patterns in Rural Architecture of Zagros (Province of Kurdistan)”. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, 36(0): 17-26. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_27345.html (In Persian)
72. - Hosseini, K.; Forouzani, M. & Abdeshahi, A., (2022). “Investigating the Relationship between Economic and Social Sustainability and Livelihood Diversity”. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 17(2): 11-27. https://www.iaeej.ir/article_145047.html (In Persian)
73. - Hosseyninia, S.; Hajizadeh Bastani, K;, Shahbazi Shiran, H.; Rezaloo, R. & Sheidaei Sola, S., (2020). “Typology of Historical Houses in the Old Part of Ardabil”. Pazhoheshha-ye Bastan Shenasi Iran, 10(26): 189-214. https://www.sid.ir/paper/386801/fa (In Persian)
74. - Jamshidian, S. & Choghajerdi, I., (2014). “Identifying factors affecting the development of rural tourism using the SWOT model (case study: Yase Chai village)”. Geographical Quarterly Journal of Tourism Space, 3(12): 45-56. https://www.sid.ir/paper/214244/fa (In Persian)
75. - Karimi, M., (2017). “Interpretable House Analysis of Factors Affecting the Housing Interpretability To Approach to Bond the Dweller and the Dwelling”. Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 5(5): 33-50. 10.29252/SMB.5.5.33 (In Persian)
76. - Kharabati S. & Shirazi P., (2021). “Achieving the Rural Housing Design Model; Case study: Tazareh Village in Damghan”. JHRE, 40 (175): 3-18. https://doi.org/ 10.29252/AHDC.2021.16935.1567 (In Persian)
77. - Kharabati, S. & Ebrahimiyan, N., (2022). “Investigation and analysis of physical-functional characteristics in rural housing (Case study: Garman village of Shahrood)”. Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 9(14): 223-241. https://doi.org/10.29252/AHDC.2021.16935.1567 (In Persian)
78. - Khodabandelu, Z. & Khorramshahi, M., (2009). “Recognizing beauty in rural housing”. Abadi, 60: 33-26. https://gep.ui.ac.ir/article_25580.html (In Persian)
79. - Mahmudi, M. & Nikghadam, N., (2008). “The Use of Architectural Design Methods for Decreasing Environmental Pollutions Caused by Housing Development”. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, 35(0): 27-38. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_27119.html (In Persian)
80. - Malekizadeh, B.; Soroush, M.; Molanaei, S. & Frouten, M., (2021). “Comparative study of traditional houses of Kermanshah and Sanandaj in Qajar and Pahlavi period”. The Quarterly of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 13(3): 946-966. https://geography.garmsar.iau.ir/article_682644.html (In Persian)
81. - Mansoori, K.; Rahimi Kalahroudi, F. & Tavkkoli, S., (2021). “Typology of indigenous housing patterns and their construction techniques in the historic village of Algen”. Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 8(12): 43-61. AHDC.2021.15725.1468/10.29252 (In Persian)
82. - Mohamadi Yaganeh, B.; Sanaei Moghadam, S. & Cheraghi, M., (2017). “Rural housing stability based on mutual information analysis Case Study: Rural stack Zylayy Township Charam”. Physical Social Planning, 4(1): 91-108. https://psp.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_3830.html (In Persian)
83. - Mohammadbigi, M.; Yagane, B. & Cheraghi, M., (2019). “Investigating the Role of Sustainable Rural Housing on the Components of Rural Households' Security Feasibility Study: Western Kharghan Village, Avaj County”. Geography and Human Relationships, 2(1): 233-248. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1398.2.1.15.3 (In Persian)
84. - Pirnia, M. K., (2008). Iranian architectural stylistics. Tehran: Soroush Danesh Publications.
85. - Poortaheri, M. & Fazlali Z., (2017). “Spatial Analysis of Sustainable Rural Housing Case Study: Villages in Mazandaran Province”. MJSP, 21 (1): 95-131. http://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-10901-fa.html (In Persian)
86. - Pourdehimi, S., (2011). “Culture and Housing”. JHRE, 30 (134): 3-18. https://jhre.ir/article-1-2-fa.html&sw (In Persian)
87. - Qayyoomi Bidhendi, M. & Abdollahzadeh, M., (2022). “Architecture, Land, and Man, Rereading and Criticizing Pirniaâ s Suggested Principles for Iranian Architecture”. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 1(1): 7-23. https://jias.kashanu.ac.ir/article_111693.html?lang=fa (In Persian)
88. - Rostamizadeh M., (2014). Yasechay village guide plan. Housing Foundation Islamic Revolution of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. (In Persian)
89. - Saidi, A. & Amini, F., (2011). “Residential instability and functional transformation of rural housing: the case of Khafar village, Natanz-Badroud district”. Geography, 8(27): 29-43. https://mag.iga.ir/article_704418.html (In Persian)
90. - Sanaei Moghadam, S. & Mohammadi Yeghaneh, B., (2017). “Analyzing the factors affecting sustainability of rural housing, Case study: rural settlements of Charosa district, Kohkilouyeh Province”. Geographic Thought, 8(16): 119-144. https://geonot.znu.ac.ir/article_25846.html (In Persian)
91. - Sartipipour, M., (2005). “Architectural indicators of rural housing in Iran”. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, 22(22): 43-52. https://jhz.ut.ac.ir/article_10737.html (In Persian)
92. - Sartippipour, M., (2009). “Sn Analytical Review of Rural Housing in Iran”. Soffeh, 19(1): 47-60. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100118.html
93. - Sartippipour, M., (2011). “Evaluation and analysis of rural housing in Sistan and Baluchistan province and suggestion for future direction”. Geography, 8(27): 96-135. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100118.html (In Persian)
94. - Sedighian, H.; Nikzad, M.; Oshnoei Noshabadi, A. & Ghasemi, E., (2021). “The Effect of Climatic Conditions on the Structure and Architectural Components of Native/Traditional Houses in Hot and Dry Areas of Khosf County, South Khorasan”. Parseh J. Archaeol Stud., 4 (14): 125-146. https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.4.14.125 (In Persian)
95. - Shafaei, M. & Madani, R., (2012). “Applying Survey Research Method in Rural Residential Design Pattern”. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 4(7): 17-30. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_32679.html (In Persian)
96. - Shahgholian, F., (2011). Registration file of the historical context of YaseChay village. General Department of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. (In Persian)
97. - Soini, K.; Vaarala, H. & Pouta, E., (2012). “Residents’ Sense of Place and Landscape Perceptions at the Rural-Urban Interface”. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 104: 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002
98. - Statistical Center of Iran, (2022). https://amar.org.ir/ Population and Housing Censuses/Census Results/Population by country divisions 2016. (In Persian)
99. - Taheri, F.; Aeinifar, A. & Shahcheraghi, A., (2020). “A Comparative Comparison of Typology of the Space Organization and Physical Elements of the Qajar-Pahlavi Period with Traditional Houses in Kermanshah”. Pazhoheshha-ye Bastan shenasi Iran, 9(23): 149-168. DOI: 10.22084 / NBSH.2019.18444.1895 (In Persian)
100. - Vasiq, B. & Bazrafshan, M., (2020). “Climate morphology of residential architecture in Khorasan (Case study: the traditional houses of Boshroyeh)”. Journal of Greater Khorasan, 10(39): 17-32. DOI: 20.1001.1.22516131.1399.10.39.2.4 (In Persian)
101. - Yousefniapash, M. & Barzegar M., (2018). “Assessing the Efficiency and Role of Eivan Based on Users’ Perception: A Semi-open Space in Rural Vernacular Houses of Mazandaran”. JHRE, 37 (161): 77-92. DOI: 10.22034/37.161.77 (In Persian)
102. - Zandieh, M. & Hessari, P., (2012). “Continuing Rural Housing Architecture, with the goal of Rural Sustainable Development”. JHRE, 31 (138): 63-72. http://jhre.ir/article-1-166-fa.html (In Persian)
103. - Zandieh, M.; Eghbali, S. R. & Hessari, P., (2011). “The Approaches towards Designing Flexible Housing”. Naqshejahan, 1 (1): 95-106. http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-5339-fa.html (In Persian)
104. - Zarghami, E.; Khaki, A. & Sadat, A., (2016). “A comparative study of sustainable architecture and compliance with the vernacular architecture of traditional houses in Iranian-Islamic”. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 3(1): 15-30. https://journals.sru.ac.ir/article_697.html (In Persian)
105. - Zebardast, E., (2010). “Application of network analysis in urban and regional planning”. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, 22(41): 79-90. https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_22270_383899d5bdcaec9ef5544e1ec3e3f6bd.pdf (In Persian)
106. - Zyari, S.; Farhudi, R.; Porahmad, A. & Htaminegad, H., (2018). “Analysis of sustainable housing in Karaj City”. Geography and Development, 16(52): 141-156. DOI: 10.22111GDIJ.2018.4119 (In Persian)
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |