logo
year 7, Issue 26 (2-2024)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2024, 7(26): 33-50 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shokri T. (2024). Iconological Study of a Selection of Seals of Early Elamite Period of Susa. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 7(26), 33-50. doi:10.22034/PJAS.7.26.33
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-600-en.html
Post Doctorate in Archaeology, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , tahereshokri@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (2193 Views)
Abstract
Seals are one of the most important archaeological data, being always considered in archeological and ancient art studies. As one of the most important archeological sites in Iran in different historical-cultural periods, especially the Elamite period, the ancient city of Susa has provided a lot of cultural-artistic data to archaeologists and art history experts, including seals. Findings from this ancient city, including the seals, indicate various artistic styles in the past, various styles of engraved seals, and iconography have a special place among this data that can express information in various fields such as symbols, myths, or narrative stories. In the Elamite period and especially the ancient Elam that is discussed in this article, we are faced with different artistic styles in the engraved seals. Styles that can express both the special Elamite art and in some cases have not been without the influence of the engraving styles of the neighboring land, i.e., Mesopotamia. Here is a selection of seals of the Early Elamite period of Susa (11 pieces) in this regard, which belongs to the National Museum of Iran, which are considered to study their images in terms of a specific cultural-artistic style to respond to the question indicating “whether the engravings of these seals of Early Elamite express a special narrative style!” The study, which is a library-museum method and is accompanied by a comparative analysis of images, can be a narrator of the power of “master of the animals” / or perhaps the best person in the society of that day in protecting the animals under his support against wild animals such as lions, somehow narrating its power with these illustrations.
Keywords: Susa, Seal, Early Elamite, Images, Symbols.

Introduction
The seal or sealing has always had an important meaning for archaeologists and art historians. The researcher can use them in indicating dates, subject analysis, determining customs, and sometimes even in understanding myths, and thus reconstructing a forgotten world in parts. In addition, by studying seals, complex administrative processes, business relationships, and cultural relationships may be somewhat understood (Neuman, 2013: 83). The use of a seal was a guarantee of authenticity, ownership, documentary participation in a legal exchange, or protection of goods against encroachment on individuals (Collon, 1990: 11).
No seals have been found in the 7-12 layers of the metropolitan area dedicated to the Susa IV period, but in any case, Le Breton’s tabulation of seals without exact origin indicates the superiority of the Mesopotamian style of seals during the first half of the third millennium (Carter, 1980: 25; Carter, 1979: 453). The influence of Akkadian art on the seals of Iran / Elam - almost simultaneously with the Awan period - can be seen on a group of cylindrical seals of unknown origin, at least one of which is purchased in the Foroughi collection from Iran (Porada, 1964: 88 -93). 

Discussion 
The form of wide shoulders and narrow waist and proportion of people in these seals is comparable to the examples of the Akkadian period. However, the equal distribution of people in the scenes of Iranian seals distinguishes them from the form of narrative distribution of people in the Akkadian seals, in which there were wide empty spaces in front of people (Porada, 1993: 486). The domination of the rulers of the third dynasty of Ur/ Ur III over Susa (from the last years of Shulgi rule on 2094-2097 BC) is reflected in the influence of the Mesopotamian sealing style on the seals of the rulers of Shimashki dynasty and the first kings of Sukkalmah (Porada, 1993: 486).
Based on the studies by researchers and comparative studies on several selected seals in the repository of the National Museum of Iran, this article will try to answer the question regarding whether the engravings of these seals of Early Elamite could express a special narrative style. The study was conducted by the library-museum method and was accompanied by the comparative analysis of images.
The seals selected from the National Museum of Iran, which are 11, can be divided into the following categories in terms of visual style and iconography:
- Susa style (Susa IV), which includes the seals No.: 592.1 (Susa), 597 (Susa), 599 (Susa), 602 (Susa), and 601 (Susa) of this collection.
In the period of Early Elamite, we   also see different styles, which we will discuss as follows:
- Akkadian Related style, which includes the seals No. 607 (Susa), and 605.1 in this collection.
- Popular Elamite style (Akkadian / Awan Related), which includes the seals No.: 619.1 (Susa), 619.2 (Susa), and 595 (Susa) in this collection.
- Ur III Related / Susa V, which includes the only seal: 606 (Susa) in this style collection.

Conclusion
What can be seen in all the designs and images of the seals is the depiction of things that existed in the life and climate of the people of that period, which were influenced their thoughts and type of look, somewhat being the engraved designs affected by the customs, beliefs, and traditions of those people. Except for the scorpion motifs on the seals, which symbolized the insidious creatures and suffering or even indicated rebirth, they were often found in arid lands and could be related to the climate that had influenced the beliefs of the people of those lands. What most of the pictures in this collection tell us, is about the fight between humans and animals; a powerful human being against strong animals, perhaps to defend a weaker animal. The fight of man and lion, with the presence of animals such as goats and cows; an ideal narrative of superior personal power. These fighting scenes are often seen in the motifs of ancient Iran (and of course Mesopotamia) from the period before Elamite and Elamite to later periods, indicating the power of a superior person in most interpretations - in older periods, perhaps the of “master of the animals” or ruler and referring to the king in more recent periods.
On the one hand, the distinct and prominent presence of animals such as lions (or cats) being the symbol of power in the land of Elam - especially the Susa plain as a habitat of this animal - e and also the goats as a constant companion of humans from The agricultural period onwards, and also in this period. On the other hand, the need to protect the owned animals accompanied by man against hostile animals does not take the creation of such scenes out of the mind. Inspired by the issues and landscapes around him, the engraving artist used to create images, which ultimately led to a particular style. In these special cases, the battle scene is a kind of narrative of a superior person to show his superiority and power. Now, this person should be considered the ruler of animals to be sought in myths, or a powerful king that is present in the historical scenes.
Full-Text [PDF 1379 kb]   (674 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2021/07/4 | Accepted: 2021/09/19 | Published: 2024/02/29

References
1. - آمیه، پی‌یر، ( 1349). تاریخ عیلام. ترجمۀ شیرین بیانی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
2. - آمیه، پی‌یر، (1389). شوش شش هزارساله. تهران: نشر فرزان‌روز.
3. - اسکالونه، انریکو، (1387). «تمدن جیرفت در شوش». در: مجموعه مقالات نخستین همایش بین‌المللی تمدن حوزۀ هلیل: جیرفت. به‌کوشش یوسف مجیدزاده، کرمان: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان کرمان.
4. - پاتس، دنیل، (1385). باستان‌شناسی ایلام. ترجمۀ زهرا باستی، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
5. - جابز، گرترود، (1370). سمبل‌ها، ترجمۀ محمدرضا بقاپور، تهران: انتشارات جهان‌نما.
6. - حاکمی، علی، (1385). گزارش هشت فصل بررسی و کاوش در شهداد (دشت لوت). تهران: پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی.
7. - حصاری، مرتضی، (1378). «فرهنگ آغاز‌ایلامی در ایران». مجلۀ باستان‌پژوهی، 5 و 6: 20-14. http://noo.rs/OvuIS
8. - حصاری، مرتضی، (1396). «بررسی تعدادی از اثر مهرهای حیوانی دورۀ آغازایلامی محوطۀ سفالین پیشوا، استان تهران». مجلۀ مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 9 (2): 28-13. doi: 10.22059/jarcs.2018.204847.142281
9. - کارتر، الزابت، (1376). «شوش شهرشاهی». در: شوش و جنوب‌غربی ایران. ژان پرو و ژنویو دلفوس (ویراستار)، ترجمۀ هایده اقبال، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی .
10. - کولون، دومینیک؛ و پرادا، ادیت، (1394). مهر در خاورنزدیک و ایران‌باستان. ترجمۀ پوریا خدیش، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
11. - مجیدزاده، یوسف، (1382). جیرفت کهن‌ترین تمدن شرق. تهران: سازمان چاپ و انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
12. - مورتگات، آنتون، (1385). هنر بین‌النهرین باستان. ترجمۀ زهرا باستی و محمدرحیم صراف، تهران: سمت.
13. - هال، جیمز، (1380). فرهنگ نگاره‌ای نمادها در هنر شرق و غرب. ترجمۀ رقیه بهزادی، تهران: نشر فرهنگ معاصر.
15. - Álvarez-Mon, J., (2020). The Art of Elam CA. 4200–525 BC. Routledge.
16. - Amiet, P., (1970). Elam. Translate: Shirin Bayani. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (In Persian).
17. - Amiet, P., (2010). Susa. Translate: Ali Musavi. Tehran: Farzan Ruz. (In Persian).
18. - Amiet, P., (1957). “Glyptique Susienne Archaïque”. Revue d'Assyriologie et d'Archéologie orientale, 51/3/ RA 51: 121–129. ISSN: 03736032
19. - Amiet, P., (1959). “Représentations antiques de construction susiennes”. Revue d'Assyriologie et d'Archéologie orientale /RA 53/1: 39– 44. ISSN: 03736032
20. - Amiet, P., (1966). Elam. P. Arche éditeur, France.
21. - Amiet, P., (1971). “La Glyptique de l’Acropole (1969-1971). Tablettes Lenticulaires de Suse”. CDAFI, 1: 217–233.
22. - Amiet, P., (1972). Glyptique Susienne. Volume ½, Memoires de la Delegation Archaeologique (MDP 43). Paris.
23. - Amiet, P., (1973). “Glyptique Elamite-à propos de documents nouveaux”. AA., 26: 2–35.
24. - Ascalone, E., (2008). The Halil Basin civilization, first international conference of archaeological research in Jiroft: 2004, (Y. Madjidzadeh (eds.)), Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts & Turism Organization of Kerman. (In Persian).
25. - Ascalone, E., (2006). Archeologia Dell'Iran Antico: Interazioni. Integrazioni e discontiotà nell'Iran dell III millenio a. C. Messina.
26. - Benoit, A., (2004). “Susa”. Persiens Antike Pracht. Katalog der Ausstellung des Deutscher Bergbau- Museum Bochum in verbindung mit der Iranischen Kulturebe Organisation (ICHO). Vom 28.11.2004 bis 28. O5.2005. Bochum: 178-193.
27. - Carter, E., (1998). “Ville Royal”. In: Suse et le Sud- Ouest de l`Iran l`Histoire et l`Archaeologie. J. Perrot & G. Dollfus. Translate: H. Eqbal, Tehran: University Publication Center. (In Persian).
28. - Carter, E., (1979). “The Susa Sequence- 3000-2000 B. C.: Susa, Ville Royale I”. American Journal of Archaeology, 83(4): 451-454. https://doi.org/10.2307/504144
29. - Carter, E., (1980). “Excavation in Ville Royal I at Susa: the third millennium BC occupation”. DAFI, (11): 11-134.
30. - Collon, D. & Prada, E., (2015). Near Eastern Seals and Cylinder Seals. Translate: Puria Khadish. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. (In Persian).
31. - Collon, D., (1987). First Impressions Cylinder Seals in the Ancient Near East. University of Chicago Press and British Museum Publication, Chicago. (Review 2005).
32. - Collon, D., (1990). Near Eastern Seals. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
33. - Dittmann, R., (1986). “Seals, Sealings and Tablets”. In: Jamdat Nasr: Period or Regional Style?, Edited by Uwe Finkbeiner and Wolfgang Röllig: 332-366. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.
34. - Dittmann, R., (1987). “Bemarkung zum Protoelamischen Horizont”. in: Archaeologische Mitteilung aus Iran Verlag von Dietrich Reimer in Berlin, Band 20: 31-64.
35. - Frankfort, H., (1939). Cylinder Seals. London: The Gregg Press.
36. - Hakemi, A., (2006). Archaeological Report of Eight Seasons of Survey and Excavation at Shahdad (Lüt Plain) 1968-1975. Tehran: ICHHTO. (In Persian).
37. - Hall, J., (2001). Illustrated Dictionary of Symbols in Eastern and Western Art. Translate: Roghayeh Behzadi. Tehran: Contemporary Culture Publishing. (In Persian).
38. - Harper, P.; Aruz. J. & Tallon, F., (1992). The Royal of Susa: ancient near eastern treasures in the Louver. New Yourk: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
39. - Hessari, M., (1999). “Proto- Elamite Culture in Iran”. Persian Journal of Iranian Studies (Archaeology).5-6: 14-20. (In Persian). http://noo.rs/OvuIS
40. - Hessari, M., (2017). “Explaning Some Animal Motifs of Proto-Elamite Seal Impressions from Tepe Sofalin, Pishva”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 9(2), 13-28. doi: 10.22059/jarcs.2018.204847.142281 (In Persian).
41. - Jobes, G., (1990). Dictionary of Mythology Folklore and Symbols. Translate: Mohammad Reza Baqapour. Tehran: Jahan Nama. (In Persian).
42. - Madjidzadeh, Y., (2003). Jiroft the oldest civilization in the East. Tehran: Printing and Publishing Organization of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. (In Persian).
43. - Moortgart, A., (2006). The Art of Ancient Mesopotamia. Translate: Z. Basti & M.R. Sarraf. Tehran: Samt. (In Persian).
44. - Neumann, G., (2013). “Elams Kulturkontakte mit seinen Nachbaren in Spiegel der Glyptik des 2.Jahrtausendes V.Chr”. In: Susa and Elam, Edit by: Katrien De Graef & Jan Tavernier. Leiden. Boston: Brill.
45. - Pittman, H., (1997). “The Administrative Function of Glyptic Art in Poroto-Elamite Iran: a survey of the Evidence”. Sceaux d Orient et leur emploi ROS Orientals, X: 133-161.
46. - Pittman, H., (1990). The Glazed Steatite Style. New York: Columbia University.
47. - Pittman, H., (1994). The Glazed Steatite Glyptic Style. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.
48. - Pittman, H., (2001). “Gliptic Art of Period IV”. in: Potts. D.T(ed). Excavation At Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967-1975, The Third Millennium, General Editor C.C Lamberg Karlovsky. Massachusetts: Harvard University. Camdridge: 231-268.
49. - Pittman, H., (2006). “Poroto-Elamische Kunstperiode (Poroto-Elamite Art)”. in: Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie, Berlin, New York, Band, 11: 26-34. https://dio.org/10.1515/9783110210538
50. - Porada, E., (1948). Corpus of Ancient Near Eastern Seals in North American Collections, The Collection of the Pierpont Morgan Library. Washington: The Bollingen Series14.
51. - Porada, E., (1964). “The Origin of Winnirke’s Cylinder Seal”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies (JNES), 5(4): 257-259. https://doi.org/10.1086/370798
52. - Porada, E., (1965). Ancient Iran: the Art of Pre-Islamic Times. New York: Crown.
53. - Porada, E., (1993). “Cylinder Seals”. in: Encyclopedia Iranica, VI: 479-505. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/cylinder-seals
54. - Potts, D. T., (1999). The Archaeology of Elam. Cambridg: Cambridge University Press.
55. - Roach, K., (2008). The Elamite Cylinder Seal Corpus, C.3500-1000 B.C. The University of Cydney.
56. - Sax, M. & Middleton, A. P, (1989). “The Use of Volcanic Tuff as a Raw Material for the Proto-Elamite Cylinder Seals”. Iran, 27: 121-123. https://dio.org/10.2307/4299824

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.