logo
year 8, Issue 29 (12-2024)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2024, 8(29): 75-104 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Baghsheikhi M, Esmaeli Jelodar M E, Khosravi L, Khosrowzadeh A. (2024). Classification and Typology of The Sassanian Pottery in Gorieh Site of Ilam Province. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 8(29), 75-104. doi:10.22034/PJAS.8.29.75
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-582-en.html
1- PhD in Archeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , m.baghsheikhi@ut.ac.ir
2- Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author)
3- Associate Professor, Research Institute of Archaeology, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Handicrafts (RICHT), Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1949 Views)
Abstract
Gorieh site located in Zarneh section of Ivan Gharb city is one of the important Sassanid and early Islamic sites in archeological studies of the west of the country which has been excavated in 2015. During a season of excavation in this ancient site, a variety of cultural artifacts were found, including pottery, and due to the importance of pottery and its role in archaeological studies, this cultural material was studied in this article. Therefore, for this study, 127 pieces of pottery from the Sassanid era, from 1500 pieces of pottery obtained from excavation, were selected for study. Initially, these pottery were classified typologically based on their technical characteristics and shape or form. This research has a fundamental nature with a descriptive-analytical approach and the method of this research has two parts: library and field studies (pottery). The main purpose of this article is to study the quantity and quality of Sassanid pottery in Gorieh area, then their typology, classification and relative chronology. Chronology has been done comparatively and cultural relations with adjacent areas have been explained based on comparative studies of pottery. The results showed that among the identified forms among the pottery of Gorieh area, including Ewer, jug, bowl, cup and plate and the most common decorative patterns of pottery are carved patterns. Pottery is often suitable for baking and a sign of oven temperature control for baking pottery, and the quality of their construction is generally average. Also, a comparative comparison showed that in terms of relative chronology, Sassanid Gorieh pottery is relatively similar to the areas of the late period. Therefore, while having some local characteristics, the pottery of this area with areas such as, Qasr-e-Bonsar, Hajiabad, Sassanian sites identified in the survey of the Mahneshan of Zanjan, North Khuzestan, Mianab Shushtar, Bushehr, Ras al-Khaimah and Tal-e mahuz sites, Abu Sharifa in Iraq They are comparable and in addition to the influences of regional style, it is most similar to the cultural sphere of southwestern Iran.
Keywords: Typology, Classification, Sasanian Potteries, Gorieh Site, Ilam.

Introduction
Gorieh area is located in geographical coordinates of 38s x: 605380 and Y: 37522210. This site is located 50 km northwest of Ilam, Zarneh district in Ivan city, about 800 meters south and southwest of lower Sartang village. (Khosravi, 1395: 32) Gorieh region drowned in water after impounding of Kangir dam in year of 1394 AH. (Fig. 2) Part of the Zagros Mountains, which overlooks to Mesopotamia and the plains of Khuzestan, is now called Ilam Province. Pottery is the most abundant cultural material in archaeological excavations and studies. Pottery is mostly used for relative dating and to know the cultural and trade relations of the ancient sites. (Khosrozadeh et al., 1399: 119) Therefore, in the present study, the Authors try to introduce and study the pottery findings as one of the cultural materials discovered from the excavation of Gorieh site, which was excavated by one of the Authors of the article, with other sites at the same contemporary.

Discussion 
Masbezan was one of the Sassanian provinces during the rule of Ardeshir Babakan (ruled 244-241 AD) (Rawlinson, 1362: 44); in historical books, this province has been recorded in two forms: ((Masbezan)) and ((Mah, sebzan)). The word Mah or May in the word ((sabzan)) is the changed form of the word ((Mad)) which means city (Qara Chanlu, 1360: 31-32) and the change of the word Mad to Mah and May, which was done during the Parthian and Sassanian eras, was also a common word in the Islamic period for refer to Iraq and non-Arabic places. (Ibid: 32) During the early centuries of Islam, western Iran in the terms of geographical divisions was considered as Jabal province (mountain) in. (Fig. 1) among the cultural findings of the excavation in the Gorieh site, a number of pottery obtained from different spaces. In the present study, from hundreds of Sassanian pottery pieces obtained by screening method, Index pottery was selected from 127 pieces and then categorization, typology and chronology were proposed. Most pottery was made using the wheel-making technique and most of them are sufficiently baked; the pottery s are made entirely of mineral chamotte (sand). In terms of the quality of the pottery s, the earthenware of Gorieh area can be divided into three groups: 1. medium 2. Average 3. Rough. In the present study, the studied samples are pottery s from ancient textures and spaces which cognitively obtained and representative of all classes and species, these potteries were selected accordingly and then discussed and analyzed. Therefore, from a comparative study conducted in a chapter of archeological excavations in Gorieh area, the number of pieces was selected separately: 96 rim, 1 pipe, 4 handles, 18 body and 8 pottery bottom Sassanian unglazed pottery s in terms of color of the dough are divided in three main groups: pea near to green (79 of 127 pieces), pea (20 of 127 pieces), red (19 of 127 pieces), brown (7 from 127 pieces) and gray (3 out of 127 pieces). In addition to the above, for the classification of pottery s which studied in Gorieh, the shape of their rims has also been considered. Accordingly, the rim founded pieces are classified into separate groups: gutters shape, triple, compact, standing and round, round inward or outward, quadruple, and flat .The highest rim diameter among Ceramics is 400 mm and the lowest is 40 mm, in terms of rim type’s number, the highest type of rim is the rounded rim. The pottery bottoms are divided into three groups: flat (Table6, numbers 1 and 3), legged bottom (Table6, number 4 to 7) and upright bottom (Table6, number 2), and handles are in two circular shapes (Table6, number 9 to 11) button shapes, (Table6 number 8) and a container tube (Table6 number 12) are separable Motifs and decorative elements of Gorieh pottery’s can be divided into four categories: 1. Simple patterns (stump) 2. Composite patterns 3. Added patterns and 4. Compression patterns.
The studied potteries, as mentioned before, is placed in common (simple) type in terms of construction and technical characteristics. In the present study dishes, based on the general shape of the earthenware and the type of edge are divided into different shapes of jug, crock, bowls, plates and cups.

Conclusion 
In each cultural region, the quality and quantity of archaeological data provide the basis for archaeological evaluations. The exploration, typology, and chronology of the potteries of a Guriyeh region were carried out to answer the research questions. The technical characteristics of the pottery show that sand is used in its composition. What is clear is that most of the potteries were fired sufficiently, and some of them were fired insufficiently, which indicates the lack of heat control in the pottery kilns. Most of the potteries studied in the present study were in the medium group, showing the tendency of the residents of Guriyeh to use vessels with medium elegance. The majority of the pottery has been made through wheel throwing, demonstrating the use of the potter’s wheel in making pottery; only a few of them are handmade. Wet hand polishing is also observed on the inner and outer walls of most of the pottery. In addition to the polishing of some earthenware, a thin or thick mud layer was also applied on the inner or outer wall and even both walls. In total, several types of pottery, including jugs, crocks, bowls, cups, and plates, were obtained from the Guriyeh area. The comparison of the kinds of pottery with those of other regions showed that pottery with general use, such as jugs (48.96%), is the primary type used by people living in this region. In terms of decorative diversity, Guriyeh’s pottery includes engraved, embossed, and combined motifs. Among them, the use of fingernail pressure to design the pottery seems to be indigenous to the Western region of Iran, and it has not been observed in other areas. Since there is very little archaeological information about Sassanid pottery in the Western region of Iran, the pottery of the Guriyeh area was compared with other regions. Based on comparisons, it was found that the potteries of the Guriyeh area have relative similarity with those of regions at the end of this period, such as (Abu Nasr Palace in Fars, Abu Sharifah Hill in Iraq, and Bushehr surveys). In general, the Guriyeh area was located on two ancient communication routes from Iran to Mesopotamia, as well as a route to the West and Southwest of Iran. Accordingly, Guriyeh’s pottery is comparable to that of other cultural regions of Iran. It can be concluded that based on the available documents, the area of Guriyeh seems to be culturally influenced by the cultural region of Southwest and South Iran, which can be attributed to its specific regional style.
Full-Text [PDF 2820 kb]   (323 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2021/06/8 | Accepted: 2021/09/5 | Published: 2024/12/21

References
1. - ابن‌جعفر، قدامه، (1370). الخراج. ترجمۀ حسین قره‌چانلو، تهران: البرز.
2. - ابن‌حوقل، ابوالقاسم محمد، (1366). صوره‌الارض. ترجمۀ جعفر شعار، تهران: بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
3. - ابن‌رُسته، احمد ابن عمر، (1891 م). الاعلاق‌النفسیه. تحقیق: م.دخویه، لیدن: بریل.
4. - ابودلف الخزرجی، مسعربن مهلهل، (1342). سفرنامۀ ابودلف در ایران در سال 341 ه‍.ق.، با تعلیقات و تحقیقات ولادیمر مینورسکی. ترجمۀ ابوالفضل طباطبایی، تهران: فرهنگ ایران‌زمین.
5. - اسمعیلی‌جلودار، محمد‌اسماعیل، (1394). پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناختی خلیج‌فارس (بندر باستانی سیراف). تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی وگردشگری.
6. - اصطخری، ابواسحاق ابراهیم، (1345). مسالک و ممالک. تصحیح: ایرج افشار، تهران: موقوفات افشار.
7. - آقاعلی‌گل، داود؛ سودائی، بیتا؛ خسروی، لیلا؛ و کریمی، مینا، (1398). «بررسی و مطالعه مصنوعات شیشه‌ای دورۀ ساسانی؛ نمونۀ مطالعاتی: شیشه‌های محوطۀ گنبد جهانگیر و (تپه) گوریه در استان ایلام با استفاده از روش میکروپیکسی». پژوهه باستان‌سنجی، ۵ (۲): ۴۷-۷۰. https://doi.org/10.29252/jra.5.2.47
8. - امیرحاجلو، سعید؛ و صدیقیان، حسین، (1399). «مطالعۀ باستان‌شناختی سفال‌های دوران اسلامی محوطۀ قلعه‌سنگ؛ شهرقدیم سیرجان». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 10 ( 25): 180-155. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2020.18449.1896
9. - باغ‌شیخی، میلاد؛ اسمعیلی‌جلودار، محمداسماعیل؛ خسروزاده، علیرضا؛ و حاجی‌محمدعلیان، علمدار، (1398). «درآمدی بر شناخت‌شناسی سفال‌های ساسانی و اسلامی محوطۀ شیرکوهِ نایین، فلات‌مرکزی ایران». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، 3 (10): 107-87. https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.3.10.87
10. - پارسه، شهرام؛ ساریخانی، مجید؛ و حیدریان، محمود، (1394). «توصیف، طبقه‌بندی و گونه‌شناسی سفال‌های ساسانی شهرستان سنقر و کلیایی». در: مجموعه مقالات ششمین همایش بین‌المللی باستان‌شناسان جوان، به‌کوشش: رضا ناصری و مرتضی خانی‌پور: 20-2.
11. - پیرانی، بیان، (1380). «گزارش بررسی و شناسایی شهرستان ایوان در استان ایلام». ایلام: مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی استان ایلام (منتشرنشده).
12. - پیرانی، بیان، (1382). «پرونده‌های ثبتی بناهای گوریه و گنبد جهانگیر». ایلام: مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی استان ایلام (منتشر‌نشده).
13. - تاج‌بخش، رؤیا؛ آذرنوش، مسعود، (1392). «گونه‌شناسی سفال‌های دورۀ ساسانی مکشوفه از تپه‌ هگمتانه». در: مجموعه مقالات باستان‌شناسی شهر همدان، به‌کوشش: علی هژبری، همدان: سازمان‌میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری استان همدان: 237-219.
14. - حسن‌پور، عطا، (1391). «فصل دوم کاوش باستان‌شناختی محوطۀ باستانی قلعه‌گوری رماوند». تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی کشور (منتشرنشده).
15. - حسن‌پور، عطا؛ صادقی‌راد، مسعود؛ و جوادی‌نیا، زهرا، (1393). «فصل سوم کاوش‌های باستان‌شناختی محوطۀ قلاگوری رماوند». مقاله‌های کوتاه سیزدهمین گردهمایی سالانه باستان‌شناسی ایران، جلد اول، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری: 97-101.
16. - خان‌مرادی، مژگان، (1396). «معرفی و گونه‌شناسی سفال‌های اشکانی و ساسانی محوطۀ جوب‌خاتون سنقر». مقالات سومین همایش ملی باستان‌شناسی ایران، بیرجند: چهاردرخت.
17. - خسروزاده، علیرضا، (1393). بررسی تحولی زیستگاهای انسانی دشت فارسان از دوران پیش‌ازتاریخ تا دوران اسلامی. شهرکرد: دانشگاه شهرکرد.
18. - خسروزاده، علیرضا؛ و عالی، ابوالفضل، (1383). «توصیف، طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل گونه‌شناختی سفال‌های دوران اشکانی و ساسانی منطقۀ ماه‌نشان (زنجان)». مجموعه مقالات همایش بین‌المللی باستان‌شناسی ایران، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور: 45-70.
19. - خسروزاده، علیرضا؛ نوروزاده‌چگینی، ناصر؛ و نظری، سامر، (1399). «توصیف، طبقه‌بندی و گونه‌شناسی سفال‌های اشکانی به‌دست آمده از دور دوم کاوش‌های قلعه‌ یزدگرد». مطالعات‌باستان‌شناسی، 12 (1): 137-117. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2020.266797.142620
20. - خسروی، شکوه، (1394). «فصل دوم پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی در محوطۀ پلنگ‌گرد اسلام‌آباد غرب، کرمانشاه: گزارش گمانه‌زنی به‌منظور تعیین عرصه و پیشنهاد حریم محوطه». مقاله‌های کوتاه چهاردهمین گردهمایی سالانۀ باستان‌شناسی ایران، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری: 164-161.
21. - خسروی، لیلا، (1395). «گزارش کاوش محوطۀ باستانی گوریه». تهران: مرکز اسناد پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی کشور (منتشرنشده).
22. - خسروی، لیلا، (1399). «نویافته‌های گچی ساسانی از بناهای اعیانی گوریه و جهانگیر برکرانۀ رود کنگیر ایوان در استان ایلام». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 10 (24): 167-141. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2019.19889.1996
23. - خسروی، لیلا، (1400). «بررسی نتایج چهارمین فصل کاوش در بنای ساسانی جهانگیر ایلام». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، 5 (17): 239-219. https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.5.17.219
24. - دارک، کن، (1393). مبانی نظری باستان‌شناسی. ترجمۀ کامیار عبدی، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
25. - راولینسون، هنری، (1362). سفرنامه راولیسنون. ترجمۀ سکندر امان‌اللهی‌بهاروند، تهران: آگاه.
26. - ساریخانی، مجید؛ حیدریان، محمود؛ و پارسه، شهرام، (1395). «بررسی و تحلیل الگوی استقراری محوطه‌های ساسانی در دشت میان‌کوهی سنقر و کلیایی». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، (10): 120-101. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2016.1549
27. - طبری، محمد بن جریر، (1375). تاریخ طبری (تاریخ الرسل و الملوک). جلد 15، ترجمۀ ابوالقاسم پاینده، تهران: اساطیر، چاپ پنجم.
28. - عالی، ابولفضل؛ و خسروزاده، علیرضا، (1385). «سفال‌های دورۀ ساسانی تا اوایل اسلام». بررسی باستان‌شناسی میاناب شوشتر، به‌کوشش: عباس مقدم. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری: 297-249.
29. - علیزاده، کریم، (1386). گزارش مقدماتی کاوش‌های باستان‌شناختی در اولتان‌قالاسی دشت مغان-اردبیل فصل اول و دوم. تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی وگردشگری.
30. - قره‌چانلو، حسین، (1360). «استان کنونی ایلام و عیلام؛ پژوهشی در جغرافیای تاریخی ماسبذان و مهرجانقذق». مقالات و بررسی‌ها، دفتر 35 و 36: 52-31.
31. - فیضی، مهسا؛ فیضی؛ نسیم و حیدری‌باباکمال، یدالله (1391). «بررسی تأثیر جریان‌های فرهنگی حاکم بر شکل‌گیری نقوش سفال‌های صدر اسلام سیمره، نمونۀ موردی: سفال‌های بدون لعاب». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 2 (3): 152-131. https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_449.html
32. - کریمیان، حسن؛ و منتظرظهوری، مجید، (1398). اردشیرخوره نخستین پایتخت ساسانیان (شکل‌گیری، توسعه، فضاهای شهری و بناهای تاریخی). تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی.
33. - لباف‌خانیکی، میثم، (1387). «سفال ساسانی شمال‌شرق ایران (طبقه‌بندی، مقایسه و تحلیل براساس ویژگی‌های شکلی)». دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه تهران، 59 ( 4-186): 177-143. https://www.academia.edu/8616954/
34. - لباف‌خانیکی، میثم، (1391). «برهمکنش‌های سیاسی- اقتصادی شهر نیشابور با زیستگاهای اقماری‌اش در دورۀ ساسانی». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، 4 (1): 202-175. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2012.35381
35. - لسترنج، گای، (1383). جغرافیای تاریخی سرزمین‌های خلافت شرقی. ترجمۀ محمود عرفان، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
36. - لک‌پور، سیمین، (1389). کاوش‌ها و پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی دره‌شهر (سیمره). تهران: پازینه.
37. - مترجم، عباس؛ و بختیاری، ذبیح‌الله، (1394). «اولین فصل کاوش‌های باستان‌شناختی، نجات‌بخشی محوطۀ برزه‌قلا (له-لار) حوضۀ آبگیر سد سیمره». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی حوضۀ آبگیر سد سیمره، به‌کوشش: لیلی نیاکان، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری: 210-200.
38. - محمدی‌فر، یعقوب؛ و طهماسبی، الناز، (1393). «طبقه‌بندی سفال ساسانی درۀ سیمره، مطالعه موردی: قلعه سیرم‌شاه». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 4 (7): 152-133. https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_992.html
39. - مسعودی، ابوالحسن علی بن حسین، (1381). التنبیه و الاشراف. ترجمۀ ابوالقاسم پاینده، تهران: علمی‌فرهنگی.
40. - مظاهری، خداکرم؛ زینی‌وند، حسین؛ و کریمی، بهرام، (1393). «زوال ولایت مهرجانقذق براساس متون تاریخی و داده-های باستان‌شناسی». پژوهش‌های‌ ایران‌شناسی، 4 (2): 102-85. https://doi.org/10.22059/JIS.2015.56682
41. - مهاجری‌نژاد، عبدالرضا؛ سراقی، نعمت‌الله؛ و جاویدخواه، معصومه، (1394). «گزارش مقدماتی کاوش محوطه‌های لاره‌لاره 1 و 2 حوضۀ سد سیمره». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی حوضۀ آبگیر سد سیمره، به‌کوشش: لیلی نیاکان، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری: 303-295.
42. - مقدسی، ابوعبدالله، (1361). احسن التقاسیم فی معرفهالاقالیم. ترجمۀ علینقی منزوی، تهران: شرکت مؤلفان و مترجمان ایران.
43. - نیاکان، لیلی، (1398). «بنای ساسانی «روئه» برکرانه‌های سیمره». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 9 (20): 148-129. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2019.15870.1721
44. - نعمتی، محمدرضا (1390). «بررسی منطقۀ دماوند در دورۀ اشکانی و ساسانی مطالعه موردی: محوطۀ تاریخی ولیران». رسالۀ دکتری، تهران: دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشرنشده).
45. - هورشید، شقایق؛ و موسوی‌حاجی، سیدرسول، (1394). «کاوش باستان‌شناسی در محوطۀ برزقاواله حوضۀ سد سیمره». اثر، 36 (68): 107-92. https://journal.richt.ir/athar/article-1-95-fa.pdf
46. - یزدانی، افشین؛ لشکری، آرش؛ و مولایی‌کردشلوی، حامد، (1399). «کاوش نجات‌بخشی در محوطۀ ساسانی سوغانلوی 3، سد کانی‌سیب پیرانشهر». مقالات کوتاه هجدهمین گردهمایی سالانۀ باستان‌شناسی ایران، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراث-فرهنگی و گردشگری: 910-905.
47. - یعقوبی، احمد ابن ابی‌واضح، (1371). تاریخ یعقوبی. ترجمۀ محمد ابراهیم آیتی، جلد اول، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
48. - یوسف‌وند، یونس؛ و میری، فرشاد، (1398). «کَلِک تَمِرخو؛ چهارتاقی نویافته از دورۀ ساسانی در غرب لرستان (طرحان)». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 9(21): 150-131. https://doi.org/10.22084/NBSH.2019.16396.1749
50. - Aali, A. & KhosroZadeh, A., (2006). “Sasanian to Early Islamic Period Potteries”. in: The Book An Archaeo-logical Study of Mianab-e Shoushtar, by: Abbas Moghadam. Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organiza-tion: 249-297. (In Persian).
51. - Abū Dulaf al-Khazraji, M- i. M., (1963). The Journey of Abū Dulaf in Iran in the Year 341 A.H, with com-ments and research by Vladimir Minorsky. Translated by: Abū al-Faḍl Ṭabāṭabāei, Tehran: Iran Zamin Cul-ture. (In Persian).
52. - Adams, R. Mc., (1970). “Tell Abu sarifa. A sassanian-Islamic ceramic sequence from south central Iraq”. Ars Orientalis, 8: 87-119.
53. - Agha-Aligol, D., Sodaei, B., Khosravi, L. & Karimi, M., (2019). “Investigation and Study of Glass Artifacts of the Sassanid Period; Case Study: Jahangir Dome and Gouriyeh Glasses in Ilam Province using Micro-PIXE Technique”. JRA; 5 (2):47-70 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.29252/jra.5.2.47
54. - Alden, J. R. & Balcer, J. M., (1978). “Excavations at Tal-i Malyan”. IRAN, 16 (1): 79-92.
55. - Alizadeh, K., (2007). Preliminary Report on Archaeological Explorations in the Ultanqalasi Plain, Moghan-Ardabil Region, First and Second Chapters. Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, 1st Edition. (In Persian).
56. - Amirhajlou, S. & Sedighian, H., (2020). “An Archaeological Study of Islamic Pottery in the Qal'eh Sang Area; The Ancient City of Sirjan”. Archaeological Research of Iran, (25): 155-180. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.3.10.87
57. - Azarnoush, M., (1994). The Sasanian Manor House at Haji Abad, Iran, Monografie di Mesopotamia III, Flor-ence: Casa Editrice le Lettere. Institue of Washington.
58. - BaghSheikhi, M., Ismaeili Jelodar, M. I., Khosrozhadeh, A. & Hajji Mohammad Alian, A., (2019). “An Intro-duction to the Typology of Sasanian and Islamic Potteries in the Shirkuh-e Nayin Area, Central Plateau of Iran”. Studies in Parseh Archaeology, 3(10): 87-107. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.3.10.87
59. - Boucharlat, R. & Labrousse, A., (1979). “Le palais d'ArtaxerxèsII sur la rive droite du Chaour à Suse”. Ca-hiers de la Délégation Archéologique Française en Iran, DAFI, 10: 19-136.
60. - Dark, K., (2014). Theoretical Foundations of Archaeology. Translated by: Kamyar Abdi, Tehran: Academic pub-lishing center. (In Persian).
61. - Feizi, M., Feizi, N. & Heydari Babakamal, Y., (2012). “Investigating the Impact of Cultural Currents on the Formation of Patterns of Early Islamic Pottery at Seymareh, A Case Study: Unglazed Pottery”. Archaeolog-ical Research of Iran, 3 (2): 152-131. (In Persian). https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_449.html
62. - Guy Le Strange, (2004). Historical Geography of the Lands of the Eastern Caliphate. Translated by: Mahmoud Erfan, Tehran: Scientific- Cultural. (In Persian).
63. - Hassanpour, A., (2012). “Second Chapter of Archaeological Exploration of the Ancient Area of Qal'eh-ye Guri Ramavand”. Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural Heritage & Tourism, Archaeology Research Institute (Unpublished), (In Persian).
64. - Hassanpour, A., Sadeghi-Rad, M. & Javadi-nia, Z., (2013). “The third chapter of the archaeological excava-tions of Qalagori Ramavand”. Short articles of the 13th Annual Meeting of Iranian Archaeology, Vol. 1, Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism: 101-97. (In Persian).
65. - Hourshid, Sh. & Mousavi-Haji, S. R., (2014). “An Archaeological Exploration in the Barze qhaleh Site of the Seymareh Dam Basin”. Asar, (68): 92-107. (In Persian). https://journal.richt.ir/athar/article-1-95-fa.html
66. - Ibn Ḥawqal, Abu-I. gh. M., (1987). Ṣūrat al-Arz. Translated by: Ja‘far Sha‘ār, Tehran: Iran Cultural Founda-tion. (In Persian).
67. - Ibn Ja‘far, Q., (1991). Al-Kharāj. Translated by: Hossein Qarahchānlu, Tehran: Alborz. (In Persian).
68. - Ibn Roste, A-I. O., (1891). Al-Alag Al-Nafsih. Research by: M. Dekhoye, Leiden: Brill (In Persian).
69. - Ismaeili Jolodar, M. I., (2015). Archaeological Research of the Persian Gulf (Ancient Port of Siraf). Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourist Research Institute. (In Persian).
70. - Istakhri, Abu-I. I., (1966). Masalik & Mamalik. Edited by: Iraj Afshar, Tehran: Afshar Waqf. (In Persian).
71. - Karimian, H. & Montazer Zohouri, M., (2019). Ardeshir-Khooreh the First Capital of the Sassanians (For-mation, Development, Urban Spaces, and Historical Buildings). Tehran: University Jihad. (In Persian).
72. - Keall, E. J. & Keall, M. J., (1981). “The qaleh-I Yazddigird Pottery. A Statistical Ap-proach”. IRAN, (19): 33-80.
73. - Kennet, D., (2002). “Sasanian Pottery in Southern Iran and Eastern Arabia”. IRAN, (40): 153-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/4300621
74. - Khanmoradi, M., (2016). “Introduction and typology of Parthian and Sasanian pottery from Jub-khatun San-gar”. Proceedings of the third national archeological conference of Iran, Birjand: Chahardarkht. (In Persian).
75. - Khosravi, L., (2016). “Report on the Excavation of the Ancient Site of Guriyeh”. Tehran: Archive of the Re-search Institute of Archaeology (Unpublished). (In Persian).
76. - Khosravi, L., (2020). “Sasanian newly found stucco from the Luxurious Buildings of Guriyeh and Jahangir on the bank of Kangir River in Ilam Province”. Archaeological Research of Iran, 24(10): 141-167. (In Persian).
77. - Khosravi L., (2021). “A Review on the Results of the 4th Season of Archaeological Excavations in Jahangir Site Ilam”. Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies, 5 (17): 11 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.5.17.219
78. - Khosravi, Sh., (2015). “The Second Chapter of Archaeological Research in the Polangard area, Islamabad-e Gharb, Kermanshah: A Speculative Report with the Aim of Determining the Area and Proposing the Enclosure of the Site”. in: The Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of Iranian Archaeology, Tehran, Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization: 161-164. (In Persian).
79. - Khosrozadeh, A. & Aali, A., (2004). “Description, Classification, and Typological Analysis of Parthian and Sasanian Pottery in the Mahneshan Region (Zanjan)”. in: Tehran, Publication of the Cultural Heritage Organization of Iran. (In Persian).
80. - Khosrozadeh, A., Nowrouzadeh Chegini, N. & Nazari, S., (2020). “Description, Classification, and Typology of Parthian Pottery Unearthed from the Second Phase of Excavations at Qal'eh-ye Yazdgerd”. Archaeological Studies, 12(1): 117-137. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2020.266797.142620
81. - Khosrozadeh, A., (2014). Investigating the Evolution of Human Habitats in Dasht-e Farsan from Prehistoric to Islamic Periods. Shahrekord: Shahrekord University. (In Persian).
82. - Kleiss, W., (1987). “Cal Tarkhan Sodotlich von Rey”. AMI, (20): 309-318.
83. - Labafkhaniki, M., (2008). “Sasanian Pottery in Northeastern Iran (Classification, Comparison, and Analysis Based on Shape Characteristics)”. Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, 59: 177-143. (In Persian). https://www.academia.edu/8616954/
84. - Labbaf Khaniki, M., (2012). “Eco-political interactions between Nishapour and its hinterlands during Sassanian period”. Archaeological studies, 4 (1): 175-202. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2012.35381
85. - Lakpour, S., (2010). Explorations and Archaeological Studies in Darehshahr (Seymareh) City. Tehran: Pāzīneh. (In Persian).
86. - Lecomte, O., (1987). La Ceramique Sassanide, Fouilles de Tureng Tepe sous la direction Jean Deshayes. I: Les periods sassanides ET islamiques, Paris.
87. - Masudi, Abu-I. A. b. H., (2002). Al-Tanbih wa Al-Ashraf. Translated by: Abulqasem Payandeh. Tehran: Sci-entific-Cultural. (In Persian).
88. - Mazaheri, Kh., Zienivand, H. & Karimi, B., (2014). “The Decline Meherjan qazagh Velayat Festival based on Historical Texts and Archaeological Data”. Iranology Research, 4: 85-102. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/JIS.2015.56682
89. - Mohajerinehad, A., Soraghi, N. & Javidkhah, M., (2015). “Preliminary Report on the Excavations of Lareh Lareh 1 and 2 Sites in the Seymareh Dam Basin”. in: Archaeological Studies of the Seymareh Dam Basin, edited by Leila Niakan, Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute: 303-295. (In Persian).
90. - Mohammadifar, Y. & Tahmasbi, E., (2014). “Classification of Sasanian Pottery in Seymareh, Case Study: Siram Shah Castle”. Archaeological Research of Iran, (7): 133-152. (In Pesian). https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/artcle_992_9fcad02e93ff4f8d2a6fe8bf1fad7ecb.pdf?lang=en
91. - Maghdasi, Abu-I. A., (1982). Ahsan Al-taqasim Fi Maʻrifat Al-aqalim. Translated by: Alinaghi Monzavi, Tehran: Iran Authors and Translators Company. (In Persian).
92. - Motarjem, A. & Bakhtiari, Z., (2014). “The first chapter of archaeological excavations, the rescue of the Barzeh Qala (Lahe-Lar) area of the Simre Dam catchment area”. In: The Archeological research of Simreh Dam catchment area, Lili Niakan effort, Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute: 200-210. (In Persian).
93. - Nemati, M. R., (2011). “Investigation of the Damavand Region in the Parthian and Sasanian Periods: A Case Study of the Valiran Historical Site”. PhD dissertation, Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University (Unpublished). (In Persian).
94. - Niakān, L., (2019). “Sasanian Structure 'Ruha' on the banks of Seymareh”.Archaeological Research of Iran, 20(9): 129-148. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2019.15870.1721
95. - Parseh, Sh., Sarikhani, M. & Heydarian, M., (2014). “Description, classification and typology of Sasanian pottery of Sanghar and Kilai'i cities”. in: The Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Young Archae-ologists, by: Reza Naseri and Morteza Khanipour: 2-20. (In Persian).
96. - Pirani, B., (2001). “eport on the Study and Identification of Eivan County in Ilam Province”. Ilam: Ilam Prov-ince Cultural Heritage Documents Center (Unpublished). (In Persian).
97. - Pirani, B., (2003). “Registration Files of Gurieh and Gonbad Jahangir Buildings”. Ilam: Ilam Province Cultural Heritage Documents Center (Unpublished). (In Persian).
98. - GharehChanloo, H., (1981). “The Current Province of Ilam and Elam; A Study in the Historical Geography of Masabdhan and Mehrjanqazq”. Articles and Reviews, 35-36: 31-52. (In Persian).
99. - Rawlinson, H., (1983). Rawlinson's Travelogue. Translated by: Eskandar Amanollahi Baharvand, Tehran: Agah. (In Persian).
100. - Venco Ricciardi, R., (1970). “Sasanian Pottery from Tell Mahuz (North Mesopotamia)”. Mesopotamia, 5: 427.
101. - Rice, P., (1987). Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
102. - Sarikhani, M., Heidarian, M. & Parseh, Sh., (2016). “Analying the Sassanian Settlement Pattern of Sonqor-o Kolyaie Plain”. Archaeological Research of Iran, 6 (10): 101-120. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2016.1549
103. - Tabari, M. b. J., (1996). Tarikh Tabari (Tarikh al-Rasul va al-Muluk). Volume 15, Translated by: Abul Qasim Payandeh, Tehran: Asatir, fifth edition. (In Persian)
104. - Tajbakhsh, R. & Azarnoush, M., (2013). “Typology of Sasanian era Pottery Unearthed from the Hegmataneh Mound”. in: The Proceedings of Hamadan Archaeology Conference, by: Ali Hojabri, Hamadan: Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts, and Tourism Organization of Hamadan Province: 237-219. (In Persian).
105. - Wenke, R. J., (1975). Imperial Investments And Agricultural Developments In Parthian And Sassanian Khuzestan: 150 Bc To Ad 640. University of Michigan.
106. - Whitcomb, D. S., (1985). Before the roses and nightingales: excavations at Qasr-i Abu Nasr, Old Shiraz. Met-ropolitan Museum of Art.
107. - Whitcomb, D. S., (1987). “Bushire and the Angali Canal”. in: Proceedings of the Symposium Common Ground and Regional Features of the Parthian and Sasanian World (Torino, June 17th-21st, 1985). Mesopotamia, 22: 311-336.
108. - Yaqoubi, A. I. A.W, (1992). Tarikh Yaqoubi. Translated by: Mohammad Ebrahim Ayati, first volume, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural. (In Persian).
109. - Yazdani, A., Lashkari, A. & Moulaei Kourdeshlavi, H., (2020). “Redemptive Excavations in the Sasanian Site of Soghanlu 3, Piranshahr Kanisib Dam”. in: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference on Iranian Ar-chaeology (2019), Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural Heritage & Tourism: 905-910. (In Persian).
110. - Yousefvand, Y. & Miri, F., (2019). “Kallek-e Tamirkhow: Newly Findings of Chahartaqi (square dome) from the Sasanian Period in Western Lorestan (Tarhan)”.Archaeological Research of Iran, 21: 131-150. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2019.16396.1749

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.