year 7, Issue 23 (5-2023)
Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2023, 7(23): 325-356 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abbasi J, Bahadori R, Cappa F, Jembrih-Simbuerger D, Schreiner M, Beheshti S I. (2023). Laboratory Studies on Materials and Pigments Used in Inscriptions and Mural Paintings in the Tomb of Ghadmagah in Neishabour. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 7(23), 325-356. doi:10.30699/PJAS.7.23.325
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-507-en.html
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-507-en.html
Javad Abbasi *1 
, Roya Bahadori2 , Federica Cappa3 , Dubravka Jembrih-Simbuerger3 , Manfred Schreiner3 , Seyyed Iraj Beheshti4
, Roya Bahadori2 , Federica Cappa3 , Dubravka Jembrih-Simbuerger3 , Manfred Schreiner3 , Seyyed Iraj Beheshti4
1- PhD Student in Conservation of Cultural-historical Objects, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Tehran University of Art, Tehran, Iran , javad_abbasi1991@yahoo.com
2- Assistant Professor, Faculty Member of Research Center for Conservation of Cultural Relics, Research Institute for Cultural Heritage & Tourism, Tehran, Iran.
3- Professor, Institute of Science and Technology in Art (ISTA), Academy of Fine Arts Vienna, Vienna, Austria
4- Expert of Research Center for Conservation of Cultural Relics, Research Institute for Cultural Heritage & Tourism, Tehran, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Faculty Member of Research Center for Conservation of Cultural Relics, Research Institute for Cultural Heritage & Tourism, Tehran, Iran.
3- Professor, Institute of Science and Technology in Art (ISTA), Academy of Fine Arts Vienna, Vienna, Austria
4- Expert of Research Center for Conservation of Cultural Relics, Research Institute for Cultural Heritage & Tourism, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (2860 Views)
Abstract
In this study, the colors used in the Inscription and mural paintings of tomb of Ghadmagah in Neishabour were analyzed by instrumental analytical methods. Ghadmagah is located in the center of the Zabarkhan section, on the Neyshabur-Mashhad Road. Ghadmagah tomb-garden is located in the village of the same name 24 kilometers east of Neyshabur, Iran, and was built in the early seventeenth century. According to historical sources Ghadmagah was built in the early eleventh century AH (ca. 1600 AD), and the origin of this site dates back to Islam. Some believe that the Ghadmagah monument was designed by Sheikh Baha’i. The architectural decoration of this building is most importantly tiling, plastering and mural paintings. Given that the building was built in different periods and originally dates back to the Safavid period. The present study aimed to study the color bedding and pigments in the Inscription and mural paintings of the building to find out what period the mural paintings in the building belong to. Mural painting is one of the Iran arts that based on the signs of old paint can be pursued to pre-history. One of the most important issues in the study of historical paintings, especially mural paint, is the identification of the nature of paintings used to decorate the walls. Identification of pigments is also important not only from the perspective of archeology but also in terms of the history of art and knowledge of degradation processes and the development of monument conservation strategies is also important. In this study, instrumental methods such as scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), Fourier- transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), polarized light microscopy (PLM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and micro-Raman spectroscopy have been used for elemental and compound microanalysis of the samples.
Keywords: Pigment, Neyshabur Ghadmagah, Inscription, Mural Painting, Analytical Methods.
Introduction
The use of physical and chemical analysis methods to identify the constituents of works of art, before any intervention occurs, plays a key role; because the results of such an analysis are very useful for deciding whether to conserve or regenerate these materials. In addition, each of the different pigments can have a different regeneration process. On the other hand, the analysis of ancient paintings may provide information about the artistic techniques and visual materials used in the past and expand the knowledge of the customs and techniques of ancient societies.
In fact, physical and chemical analysis provides useful information about the range of pigments present in an area and knowledge of dye preparation techniques and applications. In addition, the study of the originality and origin of pigments allows the discovery of connections and trade lines. On the other hand, restorers need detailed information about the chemical composition of the materials used in a work before restoration work.
Identifying the materials and pigments used in this building is one of the most important questions of this research, and then by considering the history of using pigments, we can understand the dating of the paintings in this building. Do these paintings belong to the period of construction of the building, ie the Safavid period, or were they added to the building in later historical periods? Depending on the type of painting pigments, the colors can be restored.
Materials and Methods
In this research, empirical and analytical methods have been used to achieve the goals. Data collection is based on information from library studies and instrumental methods. The complete information of the devices used in this research is fully described in the Materials and Methods section.
In this study, instrumental methods such as scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), Fourier- transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), polarized light microscopy (PLM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and micro-Raman spectroscopy have been used for elemental and compound microanalysis of the samples.
Data
The result of the analysis showed that the blue color was used in inscription was artificial ultramarine (Na6-10Al6Si6O24S2-4) on a gypsum layer (CaSO4.2H2O) also gold color showed presence of copper and zinc alloy in the ratio of 10:1 in gold color. The blue color used in the mural paintings was also artificial ultramarine on a red layer of ochre. The result of micro-Raman showed that green pigment was copper phthalocyanine (phthalocyanine green). The results of identification of the orange-red revealed the presence of a mixture of red lead (minium) and red ochre (iron oxide) in the sample. Also, according to the obtained results, ochre and mixture of iron and manganese oxides were used in red and brown colors.
Discussion
The inscription at the top of the building used two colors, blue and gold, the result of the analysis showed that the blue color was artificial ultramarine (Na6-10Al6Si6O24S2-4) on a gypsum layer (CaSO4.2H2O). The absence of minerals such as pyrite and calcite in the PLM images indicates that the ultramarine is synthetic. The blue color used in the mural paintings was also artificial ultramarine on a red layer of ochre. The result of micro-Raman showed that green pigment was copper phthalocyanine (phthalocyanine green). A synthetic organic material composed of chlorinated copper phthalocyanine (chlorinated Phthalocyanine blue). Phthalocyanine green was introduced as an industrial pigment in 1938. This pigment is unaffected by light, heat, and chemicals the use of this pigment showed that the mural paintings was restored in Contemporary period. The results of identification of the orange-red revealed the presence of a mixture of red lead (minium) and red ochre (iron oxide) in the sample. Also, according to the obtained results, ochre and mixture of iron and manganese oxides were used in red and brown colors. FTIR results showed the presence of organic material only in green, indicating that it was the only reconstituted pigment, but no other organic material was detected in other colors, which may be due to the instability of organic materials during the time.
Green phthalocyanine copper is a new pigment that may have been used to restore painting. This pigment was first used in 1320 AD, but it is not clear on what date this pigment was used to repair or reconstruct this paint. Due to the presence of oil in the FTIR spectrum of this color, it seems that unlike other colors, oil has been used to close this color, and the technique used in this color is different from other colors.
Conclusion
Identification of materials and pigments showed that the paintings are due to the presence of artificial ultramarine, were done in the Qajar period (1789-1925) and presence of phthalocyanine green in green color showed that this mural painting was restored in Contemporary period.
The result of the analysis showed that the blue color was used in inscription was artificial ultramarine (Na6-10Al6Si6O24S2-4) on a gypsum layer (CaSO4.2H2O). The absence of minerals such as pyrite and calcite in the PLM images indicates that the ultramarine is synthetic. The results of identification of gold color showed presence of copper and zinc alloy in the ratio of 10:1 in gold color. The blue color used in the mural paintings was also artificial ultramarine on a red layer of ochre. The result of micro-Raman showed that green pigment was copper phthalocyanine (phthalocyanine green). A synthetic organic material composed of chlorinated copper phthalocyanine (chlorinated Phthalocyanine blue). Phthalocyanine green was introduced as an industrial pigment in 1938. This pigment is unaffected by light, heat, and chemicals the use of this pigment showed that the mural paintings was restored in Contemporary period. The results of identification of the orange-red revealed the presence of a mixture of red lead (minium) and red ochre (iron oxide) in the sample. Also, according to the obtained results, ochre and mixture of iron and manganese oxides were used in red and brown colors. Identification of materials and pigments showed that the paintings are due to the presence of artificial ultramarine, were done in the Qajar period (1789-1925) and presence of phthalocyanine green in green color showed that this mural painting was restored in Contemporary period. FTIR results showed the presence of organic material only in green, indicating that it was the only reconstituted pigment, but no other organic material was detected in other colors, which may be due to the instability of organic materials during the time.
In this study, the colors used in the Inscription and mural paintings of tomb of Ghadmagah in Neishabour were analyzed by instrumental analytical methods. Ghadmagah is located in the center of the Zabarkhan section, on the Neyshabur-Mashhad Road. Ghadmagah tomb-garden is located in the village of the same name 24 kilometers east of Neyshabur, Iran, and was built in the early seventeenth century. According to historical sources Ghadmagah was built in the early eleventh century AH (ca. 1600 AD), and the origin of this site dates back to Islam. Some believe that the Ghadmagah monument was designed by Sheikh Baha’i. The architectural decoration of this building is most importantly tiling, plastering and mural paintings. Given that the building was built in different periods and originally dates back to the Safavid period. The present study aimed to study the color bedding and pigments in the Inscription and mural paintings of the building to find out what period the mural paintings in the building belong to. Mural painting is one of the Iran arts that based on the signs of old paint can be pursued to pre-history. One of the most important issues in the study of historical paintings, especially mural paint, is the identification of the nature of paintings used to decorate the walls. Identification of pigments is also important not only from the perspective of archeology but also in terms of the history of art and knowledge of degradation processes and the development of monument conservation strategies is also important. In this study, instrumental methods such as scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), Fourier- transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), polarized light microscopy (PLM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and micro-Raman spectroscopy have been used for elemental and compound microanalysis of the samples.
Keywords: Pigment, Neyshabur Ghadmagah, Inscription, Mural Painting, Analytical Methods.
Introduction
The use of physical and chemical analysis methods to identify the constituents of works of art, before any intervention occurs, plays a key role; because the results of such an analysis are very useful for deciding whether to conserve or regenerate these materials. In addition, each of the different pigments can have a different regeneration process. On the other hand, the analysis of ancient paintings may provide information about the artistic techniques and visual materials used in the past and expand the knowledge of the customs and techniques of ancient societies.
In fact, physical and chemical analysis provides useful information about the range of pigments present in an area and knowledge of dye preparation techniques and applications. In addition, the study of the originality and origin of pigments allows the discovery of connections and trade lines. On the other hand, restorers need detailed information about the chemical composition of the materials used in a work before restoration work.
Identifying the materials and pigments used in this building is one of the most important questions of this research, and then by considering the history of using pigments, we can understand the dating of the paintings in this building. Do these paintings belong to the period of construction of the building, ie the Safavid period, or were they added to the building in later historical periods? Depending on the type of painting pigments, the colors can be restored.
Materials and Methods
In this research, empirical and analytical methods have been used to achieve the goals. Data collection is based on information from library studies and instrumental methods. The complete information of the devices used in this research is fully described in the Materials and Methods section.
In this study, instrumental methods such as scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), Fourier- transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), polarized light microscopy (PLM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and micro-Raman spectroscopy have been used for elemental and compound microanalysis of the samples.
Data
The result of the analysis showed that the blue color was used in inscription was artificial ultramarine (Na6-10Al6Si6O24S2-4) on a gypsum layer (CaSO4.2H2O) also gold color showed presence of copper and zinc alloy in the ratio of 10:1 in gold color. The blue color used in the mural paintings was also artificial ultramarine on a red layer of ochre. The result of micro-Raman showed that green pigment was copper phthalocyanine (phthalocyanine green). The results of identification of the orange-red revealed the presence of a mixture of red lead (minium) and red ochre (iron oxide) in the sample. Also, according to the obtained results, ochre and mixture of iron and manganese oxides were used in red and brown colors.
Discussion
The inscription at the top of the building used two colors, blue and gold, the result of the analysis showed that the blue color was artificial ultramarine (Na6-10Al6Si6O24S2-4) on a gypsum layer (CaSO4.2H2O). The absence of minerals such as pyrite and calcite in the PLM images indicates that the ultramarine is synthetic. The blue color used in the mural paintings was also artificial ultramarine on a red layer of ochre. The result of micro-Raman showed that green pigment was copper phthalocyanine (phthalocyanine green). A synthetic organic material composed of chlorinated copper phthalocyanine (chlorinated Phthalocyanine blue). Phthalocyanine green was introduced as an industrial pigment in 1938. This pigment is unaffected by light, heat, and chemicals the use of this pigment showed that the mural paintings was restored in Contemporary period. The results of identification of the orange-red revealed the presence of a mixture of red lead (minium) and red ochre (iron oxide) in the sample. Also, according to the obtained results, ochre and mixture of iron and manganese oxides were used in red and brown colors. FTIR results showed the presence of organic material only in green, indicating that it was the only reconstituted pigment, but no other organic material was detected in other colors, which may be due to the instability of organic materials during the time.
Green phthalocyanine copper is a new pigment that may have been used to restore painting. This pigment was first used in 1320 AD, but it is not clear on what date this pigment was used to repair or reconstruct this paint. Due to the presence of oil in the FTIR spectrum of this color, it seems that unlike other colors, oil has been used to close this color, and the technique used in this color is different from other colors.
Conclusion
Identification of materials and pigments showed that the paintings are due to the presence of artificial ultramarine, were done in the Qajar period (1789-1925) and presence of phthalocyanine green in green color showed that this mural painting was restored in Contemporary period.
The result of the analysis showed that the blue color was used in inscription was artificial ultramarine (Na6-10Al6Si6O24S2-4) on a gypsum layer (CaSO4.2H2O). The absence of minerals such as pyrite and calcite in the PLM images indicates that the ultramarine is synthetic. The results of identification of gold color showed presence of copper and zinc alloy in the ratio of 10:1 in gold color. The blue color used in the mural paintings was also artificial ultramarine on a red layer of ochre. The result of micro-Raman showed that green pigment was copper phthalocyanine (phthalocyanine green). A synthetic organic material composed of chlorinated copper phthalocyanine (chlorinated Phthalocyanine blue). Phthalocyanine green was introduced as an industrial pigment in 1938. This pigment is unaffected by light, heat, and chemicals the use of this pigment showed that the mural paintings was restored in Contemporary period. The results of identification of the orange-red revealed the presence of a mixture of red lead (minium) and red ochre (iron oxide) in the sample. Also, according to the obtained results, ochre and mixture of iron and manganese oxides were used in red and brown colors. Identification of materials and pigments showed that the paintings are due to the presence of artificial ultramarine, were done in the Qajar period (1789-1925) and presence of phthalocyanine green in green color showed that this mural painting was restored in Contemporary period. FTIR results showed the presence of organic material only in green, indicating that it was the only reconstituted pigment, but no other organic material was detected in other colors, which may be due to the instability of organic materials during the time.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Interdisciplinary
Received: 2021/01/23 | Accepted: 2021/05/8 | Published: 2023/05/22
Received: 2021/01/23 | Accepted: 2021/05/8 | Published: 2023/05/22
References
1. - احمدی، حسین؛ عابداصفهانی، عباس؛ مرتضوی، محمد؛ و موسوی، سیدمحمدجواد، (1393). «شناخت تزئینات طلایی بدل در نسخ خطی تاریخی بررسی روند تخریب رنگدانههای طلایی و کاغذ تکیهگاه». مرمت و معماری ایران، 4 (7): 88-77.
2. - احمدی، عباسعلی، (1399). «مطالعۀ تطبیقی-تحلیلی بقعۀ عبدالمؤمن حبیبآباد، جلوهگاهی از نقاشی دیواری عهد صفوی و قاجاری». مطالعات باستانشناسی پارسه، 12: 208-189.
3. - امیرخانی، پروین، (1392). «معماری منظر قدمگاه نیشابور». پایاننامۀ کارشناسیارشد معماری منظر، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی (منتشرنشده).
4. - باتر، مسعود، (1389). «بررسی ساختار رنگدانههای نقاشیهای دیواری عصر پارتی در کوه خواجه سیستان». بلورشناسی و کانی شناسی ایران، ۱۸ (3): 334-323.
5. - بهادری، رؤیا؛ و بحرالعلومی، فرانک، (1392). «بررسیهای باستانسنجی رنگدانههای بهکاررفته در آثار رنگ و موزائیک هزارۀ سوم سوم پیشازمیلاد در ایران». اولین همایش ملی باستانشناسی ایران، بیرجند، https://civilica.com/doc/370891.
6. - بهادری، رؤیا؛ و بحرالعلومی، فرانک، (1394). «مطالعات آزمایشگاهی برروی نقاشی روی چوب در خانه بیرجندیها». بهادری، رؤیا، امین شیرازی، شهرزاد (ویراستاری علمی)، مجموعه مقالات نهمین همایش حفاظت ومرمت اشیاء تاریخی، ساری، 23-25 آدر 1388، تهران: پژوهشگاه میراثفرهنگی وگردشگری: 65-60.
7. - بهشتی، سیدمحمد؛ و خیراندیش، محبه، (1395). «مطالعه تطبیقی دو باغ قدمگاه نیشابور و باغ خواجهریبع مشهد». چهارمین کنفرانس ملی توسعه پایدار در علوم جغرافیا و برنامهریزی، معماری و شهرسازی، تهران: https://civilica.com/doc/520442.
8. - بختیاری، محمود، (1381). «راههای باستانی توس به نیشابور و آثار تاریخی مجاور آنها». اثر، ۲۳ (۳۳ و ۳۴): 346-319.
9. - پاکباز، رویین، (1389). نقاشی ایران از دیرباز تا امروز. تهران: نشر زرین.
10. - تهرانچیبلدی، عاطفه؛ نوری، عسگری؛ و رفیعفر، جلالالدین، (1394). «نگاهی تحلیلی به دیوارنگاریهای حمام شاه مشهد از منظر مردمشناسی». همایش ملی فرهنگ گردشگری و هویت شهری.
11. - خانمرادی، مژگان، و نیکنامی،کمالالدین، (1396). «بررسی ساختار رنگدانههای بهکاررفته در گچبریهای بهدستآمده از محوطۀ قلعه یزدگرد». پژوهشهای باستانشناسی ایران، 7 (13): 156-143.
12. - رحمانی، غلامرضا؛ و حسینی، مهدی، (1398). «نیتمندی و ارتباط آن با رنگهای بهکاررفته در دیوارنگارههای درباری قاجار». پژوهه باستانسنجی، 5: 41-31.
13. - رحمانی، غلامرضا؛ و حسینی، مهدی، (1399). «جامعهشناسی تاریخی دیوارنگارههای درباری دورۀ قاجار». مطالعات باستانشناسی پارسه، 11: 217-205.
14. - روشنیزعفرانلو، قدرتالله، (1387). سه سفرنامه (هرات، مرو، مشهد). قم: مؤسسۀ فرهنگی و اطلاعرسانی تبیان .
15. - رضازادهاردبیلی، مجتبی؛ و فاضلزادهتمام، زهره، (1395). «ردپای امام رضا(ع) در باغ قدمگاه نیشابور، کاری از شیخبهایی به دستور شاهعباس اول از طراحی تا مفهوم». هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی، 21 (2): 108-93.
16. - دمیرچی، شهابالدین، (1382). شیخبهایی از جبلعامل تا اصفهان. تهران: نشر خورشید آفرین.
17. - عرفانمنش، جلیل، (1376). جغرافیای تاریخی هجرت امام رضا(ع) از مدینه تا مرو. مشهد: انتشارات آستانقدس رضوی.
18. - عباسی، جواد؛ بهادری، رؤیا؛ بزرگمهر، محمدعلی؛ بهشتی، سیدایرج؛ و بحرالعلومی، فرانک، (1395). «شناسایی مواد و رنگدانههای بهکاررفته در نقاشیهای دیواری مجموعه باغ و عمارت تاریخی رحیمآباد بیرجند». پژوهه باستانسنجی، 2: 77-63.
19. - فرهمندبروجنی، حمید؛ عابداصفهانی، عباس؛ و شیشهبری، طاهره، (1391). «شناخت مواد و فنون دیوارنگاری پنج بنای دورۀ ایلخانی شهر یزد». مرمت و معماری ایران، 2 (4): 97-112.
20. - گرایلی، فریدون، (1374). نیشابور شهر فیروزه. مشهد: انتشارات خاوران.
21. - گلستانی، سعید؛ و شریفزاده، سمیه، (1390). «کنکاشی در ویژگیهای خیابان صفوی». باغ نظر، 17: 68-59.
22. - مدهوشیاننژاد، محمد؛ حدادیان، محمدعلی؛ و رازانی، مهدی، (1396). «مطالعۀ تطبیقی دیوارنگاری در تالارهای شاهنشینِ خانۀ حریری تبریز و خانۀ قوامالدولۀ تهران». هنرهای صناعی اسلامی، 2 (۱): 51-36.
23. - مولوی، عبدالحمید، (1349). آثار باستانی خراسان. تهران: نشر انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی.
24. - نظری، فرهاد؛ و نیکزاد، ذاتالله، (1392). «بازشناسی مسیر هجرت امام رضا(ع) در ایران براساس آثار و اماکن تاریخی». اثر، 62: 107-123.
25. - وثوقیعابدینی، منصور، (1383). مبانی تئوری و عملی کانیشناسی نوری. تهران: آرین زمین.
26. - هرندی، دانیال؛ طاهری، محمدحسین؛ و سرداری، علیرضا، (1394). «شناسایی رنگدانههای دیوارنگارۀ "تل مشکریم" سمیرم، مربوط به دورۀ مسوسنگ ایران». علوم و فناوری رنگ، 9 (3): 197-187.
27. - یونسی، محسن؛ عسکرپور، وحید؛ و بحرالعلومی، فرانک، (1396). «مطالعات باستانسنجی محراب ضلع غربی شبستان شمالی جامع کاشان». کاشانشناسی، ۱۰ (۱): 87-68.
29. - Abbasi, J.; Bahadori, R.; Bozorgmehr, M. A.; Beheshti, S. I. & Bahrololoumi, F., (2017). “Identification of Materials and Pigments Used in Mural Painting of Rahim Abad Historic Garden & Mansion in Birjand”. Journal of Research on Archaeometry, 10 (2): 63-76. [In Persian]
30. - Ahmadi, A. A., (2019). “Comparative-analytical study of Abdolmomen Habibabad tomb, a manifestation of Safavid and Qajar wall painting”. Parse Archaeological Studies, 12: 189-208. [In Persian]
31. - Ahmadi, H.; Abed Isfahani, A.; Mortazavi, M. & Mousavi, S. M. J. (2013). “Knowledge of gold decorations in historical manuscripts, investigation of the process of destruction of gold pigments and backing paper”. Restoration and Architecture of Iran, 4(7): 77-88. [In Persian]
32. - Akyol, A. A. & Houreh, N. D., (2019). “Deterioration Problems and Pigment Analyses of the Qajar Period Wall Paintings from Shah Bath in Isfahan”. Akademik Sanat, 4(7): 210-226.
33. - Aloupi, E.; Karydas, A. G. & Paradellis, T., (2000). “Pigment analysis of wall paintings and ceramics from Greece and Cyprus. The optimum use of x‐ray spectrometry on specific archaeological issues”. X‐Ray Spectrometry: An International Journal, 29(1): 18-24.
34. - Amirkhani, P., (2012). “Landscape architecture of Gadhamgah Neyshabur”. Master's thesis, field of landscape architecture. Shahid Beheshti University (Unpublished). [In Persian]
35. - Bahadori, Roya, Bahrololoomi, Faranak. (2012). "Archaeometric studies of pigments used in paint and mosaic works of the third millennium BC in Iran". The first national archeology conference of Iran, Birjand, https://civilica.com/doc/370891 [In Persian]
36. - Bahadori, R. & Bahrololoomi, F., (2015). “Scientific study of paintings on wood in the house Birjandi”. R. Bahadori, & S. Amin Shirazi (eds.), Ninth Conference on conservation and restoration of historical monuments and architectural decoration, Sari, Tehran: Center for conservation and restoration, 60 -65. [In Persian]
37. - Bakhtiari, M., (2002). “The ancient roads of Tus to Neishabur and their adjacent historical monuments”. Scientific and Technical Art Quarterly, 23 (33 & 34): 346-319. [In Persian]
38. - Bater, M., (2008). “Investigation of the pigment structure of Parthian era wall paintings in Khwaja Mountain, Sistan”. Iranian Journal of Crystallography and Mineralogy, 18 (3): 334-323. [In Persian]
39. - Beheshti, S. M. & Khairandish, M., (2015). “Comparative study of two gardens of Ghadmagah in Neishabour and Khajeh Rabi Garden of Mashhad”. 4th National Conference on Sustainable Development in the Sciences of Geography and Planning, Architecture and Urban Planning, Tehran: https://civilica.com/doc/520442. [In Persian].
40. - Berrie, B. H., (2007). Artists' pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics. Vol. 4. National Gallery of Art.
41. - Bruder, R.; Detalle, V. & Coupry, C., (2007). “An example of the complementarity of laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy and Raman microscopy for wall painting pigments analysis”. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy: An International Journal for Original Work in all Aspects of Raman Spectroscopy, Including Higher Order Processes, and also Brillouin and Rayleigh Scattering, 38(7): 909-915.
42. - Clark, R. J., (2002). “Pigment identification by spectroscopic means: an arts/science interface”. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 5(1): 7-20.
43. - Dal Fovo, A.; Mazzinghi, A.; Omarini, S.; Pampaloni, E.; Ruberto, C.; Striova, J. & Fontana, R., (2020). “Non-invasive mapping methods for pigments analysis of Roman mural paintings”, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 43: 311-318.
44. - Damirchi, Sh. & Soleimani, B., (2009). Sheikh Baha'i from Jebel Agent to Isfahan. Tehran: khorshid afarin. [In Parsian].
45. - Darwish, S. S., (2013). “Scientific Investigation Of The Materials And Techniques Used In A 19 Th Century Egyptian Cemetery Wall Painting (Hawsh Al-Basha)”. International Journal Of Conservation Science, 4(2): 145-152.
46. - Defeyt, C.; Vandenabeele, P.; Gilbert, B.; Van Pevenage, J.; Cloots, R. & Strivay, D., (2012). “Contribution to the identification of α‐, β‐and ε‐copper phthalocyanine blue pigments in modern artists' paints by X‐ray powder diffraction, attenuated total reflectance micro‐fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and micro‐Raman spectroscopy”. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 43(11): 1772-1780.
47. - Derrick, M. R.; Stulik, D. & Landry, J. M., (1999). Infrared Spectroscopy in Conservation Science. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.
48. - Eastaugh, N.; Walsh, V.; Chaplin, T. & Siddall, R., (2007). Pigment compendium: a dictionary of historical pigments. Routledge.
49. - Elias, M.; Chartier, C.; Prévot, G.; Garay, H. & Vignaud, C., (2006). “The colour of ochres explained by their composition”. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 127(1): 70-80.
50. - Erfan Manesh, J., (1997). Historical Geography of Imam Reza (AS) from Medina to Merv. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publications. [In Parsian]
51. - Escorteganha, M. R.; Bayon, J.; Santiago, A. G.; Richter, F. A. & Costa, T. G., (2015). “Interdisciplinary Studies Of the "Vista Do Desterro" Painting: Historical Approach, Analysis of Materials and Preservation/Restoration Techniques”. International Journal of Conservation Science, 6(3): 273-286.
52. - Farahmand Boroujeni, H.; Abed Esfahani, A. & Shishebori, T., (2012). “Understanding the materials and techniques of mural painting of the five Ilkhanid buildings of Yazd city”. Iranian Restoration and Architecture Magazine, 2 (4): 97-112. [In Parsian]
53. - Franquelo, M. L.; Duran, A.; Herrera, L. K., De Haro, M. J., & Perez-Rodriguez, J. L., (2009). “Comparison between micro-Raman and micro-FTIR spectroscopy techniques for the characterization of pigments from Southern Spain Cultural Heritage”. Journal of Molecular structure, 924: 404-412.
54. - Gifford, E. M., (1983). “The aesthetic consequences of painting materials: a study of Dutch tonal landscapes”. In: Abstracts of Papers Delivered in Art History Sessions, 71st Annual Meeting, College Art Association of America: 96-96.
55. - Gil-Torrano, A.; Gómez-Morón, A.; Martín, J. M.; Ortiz, R.; Fuertes Santos, M. & Ortiz, P., (2019). “Characterization of Roman and Arabic mural paintings of the archaeological site of Cercadilla (Cordoba, Spain)”. Scanning: 1-14.
56. - Giustetto, R.; Dario, G. & Diana, E., (2018). Decay of red pigments on a wall painting adorning the church of ‘San Francesco Dei Capuccini’in Racconigi (Italy). Archaeometric survey and restoration intervention.
57. - Golestani, S. & Sharifzadeh, S. (2011). “Exploring Safavid Street Features”. Bag Nazar, 17: 68-59 c. [In Parsian].
58. - Graily, F., (1979). Neyshabur Firoozeh City. Khavaran Press, P. Mashhad. [In Parsian]
59. - Harandi, D.; Taheri, M. H. & Sardari, A., (2015). “Identification of pigments of Tal-e Mash Karim wall painting at the Chalcolithic site of Iran”. Journal of color science and technology, 9 (3): 187-197. [In Parsian]
60. - Helwig, K., (2007). “Iron oxide pigments: natural and synthetic”. Artists’ pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics, 4: 88.
61. - http://cameo.mfa.org/wiki/Phthalocyanine_green
62. - Irazola, M.; Olivares, M.; Castro, K.; Maguregui, M.; Martínez‐Arkarazo, I. & Madariaga, J. M., (2012). “In situ Raman spectroscopy analysis combined with Raman and SEM‐EDS imaging to assess the conservation state of 16th century wall paintings”. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, 43(11): 1676-1684.
63. - Josa, V. G.; Bertolino, S. R.; Laguens, A.; Riveros, J. A. & Castellano, G., (2010). “X-ray and scanning electron microscopy archaeometric studies of pigments from the Aguada culture, Argentina”. Microchemical Journal, 96(2): 259-268.
64. - Khanmoradi, M. & Niknami, K. A., (2015). “Investigating the structure of pigments used in bedding obtained from Yazdgerd Castle area”. Archaeological Research of Iran, 7 (13): 143-156 [In Parsian]
65. - Madhoshiannejad, M.; Haddadian, M. A. & Razani, M., (2018). “Comparative Study Of Masonry In The Imperial Halls of Tabriz Hariri House and Ghavam Al-Dawlah House in Tehran”. Journal of Islamic Crafts, 2(1): 36-51. [In Parsian]
66. - Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P. & Kallithrakas-Kontos, N., (2003). “Pigment and terracotta analyses of Hellenistic figurines in Crete”. Analytica Chimica Acta, 497(1-2): 209-225.
67. - Mazzocchin, G. A.; Agnoli, F.; Mazzocchin, S. & Colpo, I., (2003). “Analysis of pigments from Roman wall paintings found in Vicenza”. Talanta, 61(4): 565-572.
68. - Molavi, A., (1970). Antiquities Khorasan. Publication of the Association of Cultural Works and Works. Tehran [In Parsian]
69. - Nazari, F. & Nikzad, Z. A., (2013). “Recognition Of Imam Reza's Migration Route in Iran Based on Historical Monuments and Places”. Journal of Technical and Artistic Science ASAR, 62: 107-123. [In Parsian]
70. - Pakbaz, R., (2009). Iranian painting from ancient times to today. Tehran: Zarin Publishing. [In Persian]
71. - Pakzad, Z., (2017). “Color Structure in the Persian Painting”. Rev. Eur. Stud., 9: 1.
72. - Pelesters, J., (1997). “Artists’ Pigments”. A Handbook of their History and Characteristics, Ashok Roy (ed.), National Gallery of Art and Oxford University Press: Washington, DC, Oxford University Press, Vol. 2: 37-98
73. - Rahmani, G. & Hosseini, M., (2019). “Intention and its Relation with Colors Used in Royal Qajar Mural Painting”. Journal of Research on Archaeometry, 10 (5: 1): 31-41 [In Parsian]
74. - Rahmani, Gh. & Hosseini, M., (2019). “Historical Sociology of Court Murals of the Qajar Period”. Parse Archaeological Studies, 11: 217-205. [In Parsian]
75. - Rezazadeh Ardebili, M. & Fazel Zadeh Tamam, Z., (2016). “Footprint of Imam Reza (AS) in Qadamgah Garden of Neyshabur A Work by Sheikh Baha'i on the Order of Shah Abbas I from Design to Concept”. Journal of Fine Arts - Architecture & Urban Development, 21 (2): 93-108. [In Parsian]
76. - Rodríguez-Gacitúa, C.; Campos-Vallette, M. & Celis, F., (2016). “Raman identification of pigments in the work of the chilean contemporary visual artist Ignacio Gumucio”. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society, 61(3): 3085-3089.
77. - Roshni Zaafranlou, Q., (2008). Three travelogues (Harat, Merv, Mashhad). Qom: Tebian Cultural and Information Institute: 198. [In Parsian]
78. - Rostami, L. & Arjmandfard, A., (2019). “The Manifestation of Female Musicians in the Paintings of Qajar Era”. Science Arena Publications Specialty Journal of Humanities and Cultural Science, 4 (2): 1-11.
79. - Rúa, C.; Sepúlveda, M.; Gutiérrez, S.; Cárcamo-Vega, J. J.; Surco-Luque, J.; Campos-Vallette, M. & Pereira, M., (2017). “Raman identification of pigments in wall paintings of the Colonial period from Bolivian churches in the Ruta de La Plata”. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage, 17: 117-137.
80. - Smith, E. & Dent, G., (2005). Modern Raman spectroscopy: a practical approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York
81. - Stuart, B. H., (2007). Analytical techniques in materials conservation. John Wiley & Sons.
82. - Tehranchi Baladi, A.; Nouri, A. & Rafifar, J., (2015). “An analytical look at the murals of Shah Mashhad Bath from an anthropological perspective”. National Conference on Tourism Culture and Urban Identity. Vol. 1. [In Parsian]
83. - Vandenabeele, P.; Bodé, S.; Alonso, A. & Moens, L., (2005). “Raman spectroscopic analysis of the Maya wall paintings in Ek’Balam, Mexico”. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 61(10): 2349-2356.
84. - Vandenabeele, P.; Edwards, H. G. & Moens, L., (2007). “A decade of Raman spectroscopy in art and archaeology”. Chemical reviews, 107(3): 675-686.
85. - Vothoughi-Abedini, M., (2013). Theoretical and practical basics of optical mineralogy. Tehran: Arin Zameen. [In Parsian]
86. - Younesi, M.; Askarpour, V. & Bahrololoomi, F., (2017). “Archaeometry of western side Mihrab of northern Shabistan of Kashan’s Jami’ mosque”. Studies on kashsn, 1 (10): 68-87 [In Parsian]
87. - Zeng, Q. G.; Zhang, G. X.; Leung, C. W. & Zuo, J., (2010). “Studies of wall painting fragments from Kaiping Diaolou by SEM/EDX, micro Raman and FT-IR spectroscopy”. Microchemical Journal, 96(2): 330-336.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |