logo
year 4, Issue 11 (6-2020)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2020, 4(11): 91-113 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rajabioun Z, Behnia A, Saed Muchashi A. (2020). The Analysis of Settlement Patterns of Parthian Period Sites in the City Qorveh. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 4(11), 91-113. doi:10.30699/PJAS.4.11.91
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-237-en.html
1- M.A. in Archeology, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Sistan and Baluchestan University, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran. , rajabiun.z@gmail.com
2- Master of Archeology, General Directorate of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of Kurdistan Province, Kurdistan, Iran.
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Art and Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Payame-Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (5878 Views)
Abstract
The city of Ghorveh is located in the south east of Kurdistan province and in the east of central Zagros. This city is a part of the Qezal Owzan River Basin. This region has an archaic history from prehistoric periods to the Islamic ones due to favorable geographical conditions. According to the surveys, in the Ghorveh City, 35 sites dating to the Parthian period have been identified. This paper studies the Settlement Pattern of Parthian sites and their relationship to the geographical environment. The settlement pattern initially divided into four clusters based on the area of the premises and then five factors were considered based on the maps drawn from the GIS. These factors include: Altitude from sea level, The distance from the river, The slope, steep direction and Land use. In addition, taking advantage of Spss software, the settlement clusters have been statistically studied and their correlation and relevance using factors were discussed. Based on the results, there is a significant relationship between clusters and some factors. In general, most of the sites are located in clusters one and two that are less than two hectares. In terms of settlement pattern, some of these sites were temporary settlements that were grazing and a number of others are not known exactly, but probably there were fixed settlements that were small villages of agriculture and livestock. But clusters three and four were all permanent settlements that were engaged in agriculture, horticulture, and animal husbandry. In general, two types of temporary and permanent settlement patterns observed in the Parthian period in the city Qorveh.     
Keywords: Ghorveh, Parthian, Settlement Patterns, GIS Software, SPSS.

Introduction
The Parthian dynasty is one of the most important Iranian historical kingdom who entered the arena in extremely difficult political and social conditions and revived some of the ancient Iranian features (Mohammadi, 2010: 4). This dynasty ruled Iran for nearly five centuries from 248 BC to 224 AD (Mohammadi, 1391: 13) they were able to establish cities and government centers (Kiani, 1374: 240). And their territory expands from the eastern parts of Iran to the Tigris and Euphrates. During this period, in addition to Sedentary and urban settlements, there are nomadic settlements. Examples of this type of nomadic settlement during this period can be found in the Central Zagros (Niknami & Mohammadi, 1394; Mohamadifar & Niknami, 2013; Niknami et al., 2013).
In Qorveh city 35 sites have been identified related to Parthian period (Behnia, 2008). Most sites of this city are small settlements (Mafi et al., 2009. 85). Parthian pottery is simple, glazed, imprinted, and clinched in Qorveh. But the most prominent Parthian pottery is in western Iran as well as in the Qorveh city of Klineik pottery. The pottery has been scattered from Kermanshah to the northern parts of Zanjan in terms of its geographical extension. Also from Chamchamal plain (Mohammadifar, 2007). Kangavar Plain (Young, 1975) and in historic sites of Bistoon, Jogar Malayer Tape, Noshijan, Ray, Shush, West Islamabad and Boroujerd have also been reported (Hernik, 1997: 117). 
In this area, there have been Sedentary and nomadic settlements since the pre-historic time. It is necessary to study the continuity of these settlements in historical periods. It is necessary to study the continuity of these settlements and types of Sedentary and nomadic settlements in historical periods. This research is based on data obtained from the field survey. In this research is used a descriptive-analytical method, and for accurate analysis of Parthian period settlement pattern in Qorveh city has been used the Gis software and Spss statistical software. Based on the available data, 6 factors are considered. Including: 1. Altitude above sea level 2. Distance from river 3. Distance from road 4. Slope 5. Slope direction 6. Land use. To analyze the settlement patterns, it is divided into four clusters based on size of the sites. Then, to analyze these clusters using factors and according to data type and purpose of research were used one-dimensional, regression and R-pearson tests of Spss software.

Identified Traces
In order to analyze the settlement patterns, the sites are divided into four clusters based on by size. According to the type of data which are nominal and scaled and the purpose of the research were used One-Dimensional, Regression and Rpirson tests of the Spss software. This analysis consists of two descriptive and inferential stages.  
The cluster one is the largest in the series. sites of this cluster are less than 1 hectare. According to the data, %57/1 of the sites belongs into this cluster. Cluster two consists of sites between 1 and 2 hectares. The third cluster is sites ranging from 2 to 3 hectares and the fourth cluster consist of sites of more than 5 hectares.
The size of the sites was considered as an independent variable and the six factors mentioned as dependent variable. According to the results of multivariate regression test, there is a significant relationship between the size of the sites factor with other factors. This relationship was strongly inverse between The size of the sites and the distance from the river was Relatively Severe Reverse.  Briefly, Larger sites are closer to the river and as the sites are smaller, they appear farther from the river. But there is no relationship between the size of the sites with the factors of altitude and slope. In addition, to understand the test results, the Cluster diagrams need to be studied. By studying the cluster diagram it can be seen that clusters one and two are in all factor categories. For this reason, there is no correlation between all factors. 

Conclusion
Based on the results of the analysis on four clusters. Cluster One is the largest cluster, There are two types of settlements. The first type of settlements is far from the river so they are located at higher altitudes. The second type located on the lower elevations and slopes near to the river. In the second cluster, the settlements are closer to the river. these sites are located at higher altitudes and different slopes. In the third cluster, the sites are closer to the river. These sites are located at low slope and low altitude. The fourth cluster settlements approach the water source. But in terms of slope and altitude are at different altitudes. In clusters one and two, there is Sedentary and nomadic settlement, But clusters three and four are Sedentary settlement that constituted a small percentage.
In general, the settlements of Qorveh city in Parthian period are in two forms: Sedentary and nomadic. Sedentary settlements have agricultural and Husbandry economies due to their geographical Charactristics, But seasonal settlements used to grazing. In fact, most of the sites include seasonal settlements. This type of settlement in this region have been prehistoric times of chalcolithic and Bronze Ages (Kura-Araxes) and in this period we also see the continuation of this type of settlements.

Full-Text [PDF 1816 kb]   (1347 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2019/11/4 | Accepted: 2020/02/22 | Published: 2020/06/20

References
1. - بهنیا، علی (1387). «بررسی باستان‌شناختی شهرستان قروه (بخش سریش‌آباد). سنندج: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی استان کردستان (منتشرنشده).
2. - خسروزاده، علیرضا؛ و عالی، ابوالفضل (1383). «توصیف، طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل گونه‌شناختی سفال دورۀ اشکانی و ساسانی در منطقۀ ماهنشان زنجان». مجموعه مقالات همایش بین‌المللی باستان‌شناسی حوزۀ شمال‌غرب. تهران: پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی، صص: 70-45.
3. - رجبیون، زهرا؛ بهنیا، علی؛ و ساعدموچشی، امیر (1394). «بازسازی الگوهای استقراری فرهنگ کورا-ارس در شرق کردستان». مجلۀ پیام باستان‌شناسی، سال دوازدهم، شمارۀ 24، پاییز و زمستان، صص: 69-55.
4. - رهبر، مهدی (1377). «گزارش حفریات باستان‌شناسی آرامگاه‌های الیمایی منطقۀ شوشتر». مقالات اولین همایش باستان‌شناسی شوش، تهران: انتشارات سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی.
5. - رهبر، مهدی (1382). کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی خورهه. تهران: مؤسسۀ انتشاراتی پازینه.
6. - ساعدموچشی، امیر (1390). «بررسی الگوهای استقراری محوطه‌های دوران مس‌وسنگ شرق کردستان (حوزۀ آبگیر رودخانۀ قزل‌اوزن)». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی دانشگاه تهران (منتشرنشده).
7. - ساعدموچشی، امیر؛ نیکنامی، کمال‌الدین؛ کریمی، زاهد؛ عزیزی، اقبال؛ و بهنیا، علی (1390). «الگوی استقراری محوطه‌های مس‌وسنگ میانه حاشیۀ رودخانه‌های تلوار (شهرستان‌های دهگلان و قروه)». مجلۀ پیام باستان‌شناسی، سال 8، شمارۀ 16، پاییز و زمستان، صص: 34-17.
8. - سبزی، موسی؛ هژبری‌نوبری، علیرضا؛ و همتی‌ازندریانی، اسماعیل (1397). «محوطه‌ها و استقرارهای پارتی شمال و شمال‌غربی استان لرستان». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، دورۀ هشتم، شمارۀ 18، پاییز، صص: 102-83.
9. - صالحی، محسن (1393). بلوک اسفندآباد. جلد اول: انتشارات مؤلف.
10. - عزیزی، اقبال (1379). «گزارش بررسی و شناسایی آثار باستانی بخش چهاردولی شرقی و غربی قروه کردستان». سنندج: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی استان کردستان (منتشرنشده).
11. - علایی‌طالقانی، محمود (1383). ژئومورفولوژی ایران. تهران: نشر قومس.
12. - علی‌بیگی، سجاد (1389). «از سرگیری پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی در محوطۀ پارتی بیستون». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی مدرس، سال 2، شماره 3، بهار و تابستان، صص: 69-39.
13. - کامبخش‌فرد، سیف‌الله (۱۳۷۷). گورخمره‌های اشکانی. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
14. - کریمی، زاهد (1385). «گمانه‌زنی محوطۀ یالغوز‌آغاج در شهرستان قروه». سنندج: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی استان کردستان (منتشرنشده).
15. - کیانی، محمدیوسف (1374). پایتخت‌های ایران. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
16. - مافی، فرزاد (1385). «تحلیل باستان‌شناختی آثار و استقرارگاه‌های اشکانی در حوزۀ آبریز ابهررود». مجلۀ پیام باستان‌شناسی، سال 3، شمارۀ 6، صص: 102-75.
17. - مافی، فرزاد؛ بهنیا، علی؛ و بهرامزاده، بهرام (1388). «توصیف، طبقه‌بندی و گونه‌شناسی سفال دورۀ اشکانی شهرستان قروه (کردستان)». مجلۀ پیام باستان‌شناس، سال 6، شمارۀ 12، پاییز و زمستان، صص: 104-85.
18. - محمدی‌فر، یعقوب (1384). «بررسی و مطالعۀ استقرارگاه‌های اشکانی در زاگرس‌مرکزی». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشرنشده).
19. - محمدی‌فر، یعقوب (1386). «نگاهی به دستاوردهای طرح پژوهشی بررسی و شناسایی باستان‌شناسی شهرستان صحنه». مجلۀ مطالعات ایرانی، سال 6، شمارۀ 11، بهار ، صص: 194-173.
20. - محمدی‌فر، یعقوب (1389). باستان‌شناسی و هنر اشکانی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
21. - محمدی‌فر، یعقوب (1391). «مروری بر تاریخچه بررسی‌های باستان‌شناختی مربوط به ایران دوران اشکانی». مجموعه مقالات هشتاد سال باستان‌شناسی ایران (جلداول). به‌کوشش: یوسف حسن‌زاده و سیما میری، تهران: نشر پازینه، صص: 31-13.
22. - محمودی، فرج‌الله (1367). «تحول ناهمواری‌های ایران در کواترنر». مجلۀ پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی، شمارۀ 23، سال 20، شهریور، صص: 43-5.
23. - نجفی، سیدیدالله (1369). جغرافیای عمومی استان کردستان. تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.
24. - نیساری، سیروس (1350). جغرافیای ایران. تهران: چاپ پاد.
25. - نیکنامی، کمال‌الدین (1389). «شرحی بر آنالیز مقیاس‌سازی چندبُعدی (MDS)». مجلۀ دانشکده ادبیات و علوم‌انسانی. ضمیمۀ 4، بهار و تابستان، صص: 58-1.
26. - نیکنامی، کمال‌الدین؛ محمدی‌فر، یعقوب؛ و صراف، محمدرحیم (1385). «تحلیل باستان‌شناختی استقرارهای اشکانی در زاگرس‌مرکزی». مجلۀ دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم‌انسانی دانشگاه تهران. دورۀ 5، شمارۀ 57، صص: 110-93.
27. - هرینک، ارنی (1376). سفال ایران در دورۀ اشکانی. ترجمۀ حمیده چوبک، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی (پژوهشگاه).
28. - Boucharlat, R., (1987). “Less NiveaupostAchemenids a Susa”. DAFI, No. 15, Pp: 145-311.
29. -Delougaz, P., & Kantor, H. J., (1971). Chogha mish: the first five seasons of excavations. Vol.1, The oriental institute of the University of Chicago.
30. - Djamili, M.; De Beaulieu, J. L.; Niller, N.; Punel, V. A. & Fazeli, H., (2009). “Vegetation History of the SE Section of Zagros Mountains During the Last Five Millennia: a Pollen Record from the Maharlou Lake. Fars Province. Iran”. Veget Hist Archaeobot, NO. 18, Pp: 123-136.
31. - Keall, E. j. & Keall, M. J., (1981). “The Qaleh-iYazdgird Pottery: A Statistical Approach”. IRAN, NO. XIX, Pp: 33-80.
32. - Kleiss, W., (1970). “Zur topographie des (Partherhanges) in Bisutun”. AMI, No. 3 (N.F), Pp: 133-168.
33. - Kleiss, W., (1973). “Qaleh Zahak in Azarbaijan”. AMI, No. 6 (N.F), Pp: 163-196.
34. - Kleiss, W., (1985). “Der Saulenbau von Khurha”. AMI, No. 18, Pp: 173-180.
35. - Kleiss, W. & Calmeyer, P., (1996). Bisutun, Ausgrabungen in den Jahren 1963-1967. Berlin: GebrmannVerlag.
36. - Lecomte, O., (1987). “La ceramiqueSassanide”. Fouilles de Tureng Tepe, sous la direction de Jean Deshayes par Remy Boucharlatet et Oliver Lecomte. Paris, Pp: 93-113.
37. - Mohammadifar, Y. & Niknami, K., (2013). “Parthian settlement patterns in the Central Zagros region of western Iran”. International Journal of Archaeology. No .1(1), Pp: 6-12, doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20130101.12:
38. - Niknami. K.; Irandoust, H. & Tahmasebi, A., (2013). “Environmental and Cultural Factors Influencing Parthian Archaeological Site Distribution in the Sarfirouzabad Plain of Kermanshah, Northwest of Iran”. International Journal of Geosciences, Published Online January, NO. 4, Pp: 69-77, doi:10.4236/ijg .
39. - Rajabioun, Z. & Shirazi, R., (2015). “Settlement Pattern of Yanik Culture in Eastern Kurdistan, Iran”. International Journal of Archaeology, NO. 3(1), Pp: 8-16, Published online April 8, doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20150301.12
40. - Stevens, L. R., Ito, E.; Schwalb, A. & Wright, H. E., (2006). “Timing of Atmospheric Precipitation in the Zagros Mountains Inferred from a Multi-Proxy Record from Lake Mirabad, Iran”. Quaternary Research, NO. 66, Pp: 494–500.
41. - Trinkaus, C. M., (1986).” Pottery from the Damghan Plain, Iran: Chronolgy and Variability from the Parthian to the Islamic period”. Studia Iranica 15/1.
42. - Van Zeist, W. & Wright, H. E., (1963). “Preliminary pollen studies at Lake Zeribar, Zagros Mountains, Southwestern Iran”. Science, NO. 140 (3562), Pp: 65-67.
43. - Young, T. C., (1975). “Kangavar Valley Survey”. IRAN, NO. 13, Pp:191-193.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.