logo
year 9, Issue 34 (3-2026)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2026, 9(34): 7-30 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bahrami M. (2026). Analyses of Cultural Materials from the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Periods at the Qela Zeka Site in Khorram Abad County, Lorestan. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 9(34), 7-30. doi:10.61882/PJAS.1352.777.4
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-1352-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran. , Bahrami.moh@lu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (251 Views)
Abstract
The Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods are the important periods of human life. The why and how of the transition process from the Paleolithic to the Neolithic in different regions is considered an important archaeological issue. Therefore, it is important to understand and study the sites related to this period to explain this process. Ghela Zeka Tape is located in Khorramabad, in the central Zagros region. Valuable information about the Neolithisation process, Neolithic, and Chalcolithic periods has been published from this area. Based on the results of the boundary determination, Ghela Zeka has an area of nearly three hectares. In this research, with the aim of introducing and explaining the data, the author has reviewed, studied, and compared the findings obtained from the Ghela Zeka, including stone tools, pottery sherds, and a sample of an animal figurine from the Neolithic and early Chalcolithic period. As a result of this research, was confirmed the possibility of the existence of layers from the Neolithisation period was raised and the presence of evidence from the pre-pottery and pottery Neolithic periods. These results were obtained from examining and comparing chipped stone materials such as various flake, mixed, pyramidal, and bullet-shaped cores, and tools such as notched, retouched blades/bladelets, and sickle blades, as well as pottery samples of the Roahel type. From the Chalcolithic period, evidence of pottery of the Bagh-e No and Giyan V types indicated a continuation of settlement from the Neolithic to the early Chalcolithic period. Based on radio carbon dating of the Bagh-e No culture and comparison with the Sialk I-III cultures on the Central Plateau, the Bagh-e No and Giyan V pottery cultures have been dated to the late 6th to late 5th millennium BC. As a result of this research, questions about the periods of the site and its role in the studies of this period are answered. The importance of this research is that by analyzing the materials of these important periods in Central Lorestan, it highlights the importance of future excavations to study the transition from Neolithic to Chalcolithic.
Keywords: Lorestan, Khorramabad, Neolithic, Chalcolithic, Qela Zeka.

Introduction
The beginning of agriculture and domestication, the creation of architecture and building houses with simple and primitive materials, and the increase in population are some of the prominent features of the Neolithic period. Referring to these changes and developments, Bar-yosef refers to it as the most vital human revolution after 2.5 million years of cultural growth and evolution (Bar-Yosef, 2001: 117). The first studies on the Neolithic in western Iran were carried out by Robert Braidwood in Kermanshah (Braidwood et al., 1961). After a hiatus of about 30 years, research on this period resumed with the excavation of the Chogha Golan (Zeidi & Conard, 2013), Sheikhi Abad (Matthews et al., 2013), and Eastern Chia Sbez (Darabi et al., 2011), which continues to the present (Darabi et al., 2024). During this period, the formation and expansion of early villages took place, which reflects a multifaceted development in the societies of the region in various economic, social, and ritual fields, which is divided into the following sub-periods: Transitional Neolithic (9700-8000 BC), Pre-Pottery Neolithic (8000-7000 BC), and Pottery Neolithic (7000-6000 BC) (Darabi, 2024: 8). The Central Zagros Chalcolithic period covers a period of two thousand years from 5500 to 3300 (Henrickson, 1991: 278). Until the 1970s, the Central Zagros Chalcolithic period chronology of western Iran was based on the Giyan sequence, which both McCan and Dyson published based on the typology of Giyan V pottery (Henrickson, 1985: 63). This period has been divided by Elizabeth Henrickson into three phases: Lower, Middle, and Upper (Henrickson, 1985:66). This period in Lorestan had its own unique characteristics, so that its Lower period was different from other areas of the Central Zagros and had its own culture with local characteristics, which is known as the “Bagh-e No culture”. After the Bagh-e No, it was replaced by a pottery culture known as the Se-Gabi (SGP) and the Giyan Vc, which was related to the Ubaid culture in Mesopotamia and which Hole called the “Daurai phase” in the Khorram Abad valley (Hole, 2007:72). The Upper Chalcolithic, like the previous period, had its own characteristics, which were more closely related to and more strongly influenced by the growing Uruk culture in Mesopotamia and Susa II in the Suziana Plain, which in the Central Zagros is comparable and recognizable with the Godin VI period (Young, 1969). 
Since the Ghela Zeka Tape, with an area of nearly 3 hectares, has reliable and strong evidence of Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods in Khorram Abad, analyzing its cultural findings with the aim of introducing and explaining the importance of this work is an undeniable necessity. The evidence studied in this research shows that Ghela Zeka can have a prominent position as one of the key Neolithic and Chalcolithic sites in the Central Zagros. Given the extensive settlement and diversity of material finds, questions about the periods of settlement of the Tape, cultural interactions with surrounding areas, and its importance in studies of the Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic arise, which are addressed in this study. It seems that Ghela Zeka had settlements from different stages of the Neolithic period, which played an important role in the transition to the Early Chalcolithic and the Bagh-e No in Central Lorestan.


Identified Traces
Ghela Zeka is located in Dehpir district of the Khorram Abad county, 10 km northeast of Khorramabad city. This monument has a geographical location of 48° 46’ 67”, 33° 55’ 15” and 1475 masl (Fig. 1). The most important material findings from the Tape included chipped stones, pottery, and a clay figurine resembling boars. 
The stone tools belonging to the Neolithic period were obtained from the excavated layers of the boundary determination pits, which included; various amorphous cores, pyramidal blades and blade lets and bullet cores, various types of simple and retouched blades, blade lets, chisels, scrapers, ridges and sickle blades (Figs. 3,4). The Ghela Zeka community mainly used chart in different colors and sometimes flint and obsidian to make and produce tools. The conglomerate outcrop 7 km west and southwest could have been the main source of this stone, which is distributed up to 3 km from the Tape (Fig. 2). Small fragments of obsidian in the layers of Ghela Zeka are an indication of trans-regional relations of the people of the site. Based on experimental studies in various sites in western Iran, this stone was probably supplied from the sources of Nimrud Dagh in southeastern Anatolia (Renfrew, 1969: 430; Darabi & Glascock, 2013; Pullar, 1990: 12).
A total of 16 source samples were obtained from the exploration of boreholes located in the field, including 5 blade and blade let, 7 amorphous cores, and 5 mixed cores. During the excavation, 32 stone tool samples were obtained. The Neolithic pottery of Lorestan is known as the Roahol phase (Bahrami & Fazeli Nashli, 2016: 32). This pottery was first identified from the Neolithic Roahol site in the Khorramabad valley (Bahrami et al., 2012), which can be compared with the pottery of Mohammad Jafar in the Alikosh of Dehloran (Bahrami & Mohammadian, 2025: 61). Several pottery sherds similar to Roahol pottery were found from the Ghela Zeka, two of which were painted (Figs. 5-6: No: 5,6). Also, a clay figurine resembling a boar was found in the Neolithic layers of borehole number 10, measuring about 5 cm in length and 4 cm in height (Fig. 7).
As mentioned earlier, the Early Chalcolithic in Lorestan is known as the Bagh-e No culture. Most of the pottery from this period was found from the surface survey (Fig. 6), and only 3 samples were obtained from the determine the boundary (Fig. 8). The pottery of this period has straight and elongated edges and due to insufficient and incomplete firing has a gray paste and a mixture of straw. Their outer surface coating is buff or orange, decorated mainly with geometric and rarely human and possibly plant decorations in black and red (Figs. 5,6, Table. 1). Young has classified the pottery of this period into two groups IA and IB. Young’s type IA pottery is a type of pottery with a mixture of straw and buff, which usually has thick walls, which Young has introduced as early pottery with a mixture of straw, and group IB he considers with the same characteristics but of the embossed type (Young, 1966:230). Goff has mentioned these potteries as early pottery (Goff, 1971:134). This type of pottery has also been reported in Chia Siah and Chia Zargaran of Tarhan (Schmidt et al., 1989; Goff, 1971), the upper layers of Abdul Hussein Tepe (Pullar 1990), and many sites in different cities of Lorestan.

Conclusion
Based on what has been said above, Ghela Zeka Tape encompasses a long settlement from the pre-pottery Neolithic period before the 7th millennium BC to the end of the 5th millennium BC. The presence of amorphous, pyramidal and mixed cores in this complex, along with ridges and dentils, indicates the possibility of settlement in the transitional Neolithic period before the 8th millennium BC. The presence and abundance of tools made on blades and blade lets, including sickle blades and bullet cores, reflects the existence of a possible agricultural community at Ghela Zeka in the 8th millennium BC. Ghela Zeka, like many Neolithic sites in western Iran, entered into trans-regional interactions during this period and received and produced obsidian chipped stones Given the area of the site, which is more than 3 hectares, this agricultural community was probably a settlement. No settlement of this period has been identified in Lorestan so far, and Ghela Zeka may be considered one of the most extensive Neolithic sites in western Iran. The discovery of an animal figurine could be a sign of a society with ritual and symbolic dimensions. Another important feature of Ghela Zeka is the presence of the Pre-pottery Neolithic following the Pottery Neolithic, which could help explain the transition between these two periods in the 7th millennium BC in the region and the differences in tool industries and livelihoods of its people. The continuity of settlement from the Neolithic to the Lower Chalcolithic is important, as reliable pottery evidence from the Bagh-e No and possibly Giyan V has been found. Perhaps one of the most important questions in the archaeology of Lorestan and western Iran, namely when, why and how the transition from the Neolithic to the Chalcolithic and its biological aspects, can be answered in scientific excavations. Based on available data, Ghela Zeka was inhabited until the late 5th millennium BC and then abandoned. Ultimately, an accurate understanding of the time and various aspects of life at Ghela Zeka requires scientific exploration and providing an absolute dating of it.
Full-Text [PDF 1591 kb]   (59 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2025/09/6 | Accepted: 2025/11/6 | Published: 2026/03/20

References
1. - بهرامی، محمد؛ و فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن، (1395). «مروری بر وضعیت باستان‌شناسی درّه خرم‌آباد در دورۀ نوسنگی و مس‌وسنگ». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 6 (10): 46-27. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2016.1545
2. - بهرامی، محمد، (1404). «گزارش دو فصل کاوش گمانه‌زنی به‌منظور تعیین عرصه و پیشنهاد حریم تپه قلازکه شهرستان خرم‌آباد، لرستان». مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی لرستان. (منتشر نشده).
3. - بهرامی، محمد؛ و محمدیان، محمدرضا، (1403). «پیوندهای فرهنگی لرستان و جنوب‌غرب ایران در دورۀ نوسنگی با تکیه‌بر شواهد باستان‌شناسی». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی زاگرس، 1 (2): 71-48.
4. - پرویز، احمد، (1385). «گزارش بررسی دشت سیلاخور شهرستان بروجرد». جلد نخست، دهستان چالان‌چولان. (منتشر نشده)
5. - پرویز، احمد، (1387). «گزارش بررسی و شناسایی دهستان کره‌گاه غربی شهرستان خرم‌آباد». مرکز اسناد میراث‌فرهنگی لرستان. (منتشر نشده).
6. - دارابی، حجت، (1392). «صنایع سنگی محوطه چیاسبز شرقی، سد سیمره؛ تغییرات تکنولوژیکی از دورۀ انتقالی نوسنگی به نوسنگی بی‌سفال در غرب ایران». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، 3 (5): 24-7. https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_712.html
7. - دارابی، حجت، (1403). «تغییرات زیستگاهی دورۀ نوسنگی بی‌سفال در زاگرس‌مرکزی». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی زاگرس، 1 (1): 20-1.
8. - فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن، (1385). باستان‌شناسی دشت قزوین از هزارۀ ششم تا هزارۀ اول قبل از میلاد. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
9. - علی‌محمداسفندیاری، آزرمیدخت، (1378). جایگاه فرهنگ چشمه‌علی در فلات مرکزی ایران. تهران: انتشارات معاونت پژوهشی سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
10. - گیرشمن، رومن، (1379). سیلک کاشان. ترجمۀ اصغر کریمی، جلد اول، تهران: انتشارات سازمان میراݢݢث‌فرهنگی کشور.
11. - مک‌کارتر، سوزان فاستر، (2007). نوسنگی. ترجمه: حجت دارابی و جواد حسین‌زاده (1390). تهران: انتشارات سمیرا.
12. - هول، فرانک، (1381). «باستان‌شناسی دورۀ روستانشینی». در: باستان‌شناسی غرب ایران، به‌کوشش: فرانک هول، ترجمۀ زهرا باستی، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
14. References
15. - Algaze, G., (1993). The Uruk world System: The Dynamics of Expansion of Early Mesopotamia Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
16. - Ali Mohammad Esfandiari, A., (2009). The Place of Cheshme Ali Culture in the Central Plateau of Iran. Research Deputy Publications of the National Cultural Heritage Organization, Tehran (in Persian).
17. - Bahrami, M., (2024). “Cultural Links between Lorestan and Southwest Iran in the Neolithic Period Based on Archaeological Evidence”. Zagros Archaeological Research, 1 (2): 48-71. (in Persian).
18. - Bahrami, M., (2014). “Report of Two Seasons of Speculative Exploration to Determine the Area and Proposed Boundary of Qala Zeke Tape in Khorramabad County, Lorestan”. Lorestan Cultural Heritage Documentation Center. (Unpublished), (in Persian).
19. - Bahrami, M. & Abbasnejad Seresti, R., (2017). “The Role of Environmental Factors in Settling Neolithic Sites in Luristan, Iran”. Intl. J. Humanities, 24 (1): 1-17.
20. - Bahrami, M., Sabzi Doabi, M. & Nikzad, M., (2012). “Note on Three Neolithic Sites in Pish-e Kuh Region, Central Zagros”. NEO-LITHIC 1/12 TheNewsletter of Southwest Asian Neolithic Research, Berlin: 8-14.
21. - Bahrami, M. & Fazeli-Nashli, H, (2016). “A Review of the Archaeological Status of the Khorramabad Valley in the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Periods”. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Iranian Archaeological Research, 6 (10): 27-46. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2016.1545
22. - Bar-Yosef, O., (2001). “From Sedentary Foragers to Village Hierarchies: The Emergence of Social Institutions”. in: G. Runciman (ed.), The Origins of Human Social Institutions, Royal Society and British Academy. London: 1-38.
23. - Braidwood, L. S., Braidwood, R. J., Howe, E., Reed, Ch. A. & Watson, P. J., (1983). Prehistoric Archaeology Along the Zagros Flanks. The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications, Vol. 105.
24. - Braidwood, R., Howe, B. & Reed, C. A., (1961). “The Iranian Prehistoric project”. Science, 133: 2008-2010.
25. - Contenau, G. & Ghirshman, R., (1935). Fouilles du Te̍pe̍-Giyan Pre̍s de Ne̍havand 1931 et 1932. Mussee du Louvre, Department des Antiquites Orientals, Sere Archaeologique 3, Paris: Paul Geuthner.
26. - Darbi, H., (2004). “Habitat Changes in the Neolithic in the Central Zagros”. Zagros Archaeological Research,1 (1): 1-20.
27. - Darabi, H., (2012). “Towards Reassessing the Neolithization Process of Western Iran”. Documenta Praehistoric, 39: 03-110.
28. - Darbi, H., (2013). “Stone Industries of the East Chiasbez Site, Seymareh Dam; Technological Changes from the Transitional Neolithic to the Neolithic in Western Iran”. Journal of Iranian Archaeological Research, 5 (3): 24-7. (in Persian). https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_712.html
29. - Darabi, H., (2015). An Introduction to the Neolithic Revolution of the Central Zagros, Iran. BAR International Series 2746, Oxford.
30. - Darabi, H. & Glascock, M., (2013). “Source of Obsidians Found at East Chia Sabz”. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40: 3804-3809.
31. - Darabi, H., Bahramiyan, S., Ghobadizadeh, H., Sheikhi, J. & Eskandari, M., (2024). “An Interim Report of the New Excavations at the Neolithic Site of Chogha Golan,Ilam Province, Western Iran”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 16(2): 51-67. (in Persian).
32. - Darabi, H., Naseri, R., Young, R. & Fazeli, H., (2011). “Absolute chronology of East Chia Sabz: A Pre-Pottery Neolithic Site in western Iran”. Documenta Praehistorica, 38: 255-265.
33. - Fazeli Nashli, H., (2006). Archaeology of the Qazvin Plain from the 6th to the 1st millennium BC. University of Tehran Press, Tehran. (in Persian).
34. - Garfinkel, Y., (2000). “The Khazineh Painted Style of Western Iran”. Iran, 38: 57-69.
35. - Girshman, R., (2000). Silk Kashan. Translated by: Asghar Karimi, Vol. 1, National Cultural Heritage Organization Press, Tehran. (in Persian).
36. - Goff, C., (1971). “Luristan before the Iron age”. Iran, 9: 131-152.
37. - Henrikson, E. F., (1985). “An Updated Chronology of the Central Zagros Chalcolithic”. Iran, XXIII: 63-123.
38. - Henrikson, E. F., (1991). “The Chalcolithic Period in the Zagros Highlands”. in: Encyclopedia Iranica, vol. 4, Fase 3, Ceramic IV: 278-282.
39. - Hole, F., (2007). “Cycles of Settlement in the Khorramabad Valley in Luristan, Iran”. in: Settlement and Society Essays Dedicated to Robert Mccormick Adams, Edited by: Elizabeth C. Stone, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California. Los Angeles and the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. pp. 63-82.
40. - Hole, F., Flannery, K. V. & Neely, J. A., (1969). Prehistory and Human Ecology of The Deh Luran plain. Memoir No. 1. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.
41. - Kozlowski, S. K., (1994). “Chipped Neolithic industries at eastern wing of the Fertile Crescent (Synthesis Contribution), Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent”. in: Gebel H. G. and Kozlowski S. K.(eds.), Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 1, Berlin, ex Oriente: 143-171.
42. - Kozlowski, S. K., (1996). “From Zawi Chemi to M'lefaat Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent and their Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions”. in: S. K. Kozlowski and H. G. Gebel (eds.), Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 3, Berlin, ex Oriente: 175-82.
43. - Levine, L. & Young, C. J., (1986). “A Summary of the Ceramic Assemblages of the Central Western Zagros from the Middle Neolithic to the Late Third Millenium BC”. Colloques Internationaus CNRS, Prehistoire de la Mesopotamie: 15-53, Editions du CNRS. Paris, 1986.
44. - Matthews, R., Mohammadifar, Y. & Matthews, W., (2013). “From Hunter-Forager to Former-Herder in the Central Zagros: Research Context, Issues, and Methods”. in: R. Matthews, W. Matthews and Y. Mohammadifar (eds.), The Earliest Neolithic of Iran: 2008 Excavations at Sheikh-e Abad and Jani: Central Zagros Archaeological Project, Oxbow Books. Oxford: UK: 1-11.
45. - Mc Donald, M. M. A, (1979). “An Examination of Mid-Holocene Settlement Patterns in the Central Zagros Region of Western Iran”. Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto.
46. - McCarter, S. F., (2007). Neolithic. Translated by: Hojjat Darabi and Javad Hosseinzadeh (2011). Tehran: Samira Press.(in Persian).
47. - Moradi, B., Mashkour, M., Eghbal, H., Azadeh Mohaseb, F., Ghassimi, T., Rahmati, E., Vahdati, A. A., Gratuze, B. & Tengberg, M., (2016). “A Short Account of Kelek Asad Morad: A Pre-Pottery Neolithic Site in Pol e Dokhtar, Luristan”. in: The Neolithic of the Iranian Plateau Recent Research, Edited by: Kourosh Roustaei and marjan Mashkour, Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 18, Berlin, ex or iente.
48. - Olszewski, D. I., (1996). “The Lithic Transition to the Early Neolithic in the Zagros Region: Zarzian and Mlefatian Industries”. Neolithic Chipped Stone Industries of the Fertile Crescent and their Contemporaries in Adjacent Regions, Kozlowski S. K. and Gebel H. G. (eds.), Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 3, Berlin, ex Oriente: 183-92.
49. - Parviz, A., (2006). Report on the Survey of Silakhor Plain in Borujerd County. Vol. 1, Chalancholan Village, (unpublished), (in Persian).
50. - Parviz, A., (2008). “Report on the Survey and Identification of the Western Korehgah Village in Khorramabad County”. Lorestan Cultural Heritage Documentation Center. (unpublished), (in Persian).
51. - Pullar. J., (1990). Tepe Abdul Hossain: A Neolithic Site in Western Iran, Excavations 1978. BAR International Series 563.Oxford.
52. - Renfrew, C. L., (1969). “The Sources and Supply of the Deh Luran Obsidian”. in: Hole, F., Flannery, K. V., Neely, J.A., (eds.), Prehistory and Human Ecology on the Deh Luran Plain, Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, No. 1. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor: 429-434.
53. - Schmidt, E. F., Van Loon, M. N. & Curvers, H. H., (1989). The Holmes Expedition to Luristan. Vol. 2, Oriental Institute Publications 108, Chicago.
54. - Vahdati Nasab, H., Jayez, M., Qorbani, H. R., Darabi H. & Taylor, H., (2013). “Preliminary Techno-Typological Analysis of Chipped Stone Materials from Sheikh-e Abad”. The Earliest Neolithic of Iran: 2008 Excavations at Sheikh-E Abad and Jani, Matthews, R., Matthews, W., Mohammadifar, Y. (eds.), Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK: 117-129.
55. - Young, T. C., (1966). Survey in Western Iran 1961, Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 25A.
56. - Young, T. C., (1969). Excavation at Godin Tepe. first progress report, Royal Ontario Museum.
57. - Zeidi, M. & Conard, N. J., (2013). “Chipped stone artifacts from the aceramic Neolithic site of Chogha Golan, Ilam Province, western Iran, Stone Tools in Transition: From Hunter-Gatherers to Farming Societies in the Near East”. Borrell F., José Ibanez, J. & Molist M. (eds.), Bellaterra (Barcelona): Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions: 315-326.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.