logo
year 9, Issue 31 (5-2025)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2025, 9(31): 155-172 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hessari M, Sarmadijou A. (2025). New Perspectives on Sogdian Societies in North China. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 9(31), 155-172. doi:10.61882/PJAS.1240
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-1240-en.html
1- Professor, Department of Prehistoric Archeology, Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute (RICHT), Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author). , m.hessari@richt.ir
2- Ph.D. in Ancient Languages, Researcher in Iranology Foundation, Hamadan Branch, Hamadan, Iran.
Abstract:   (1438 Views)
Since the Achaemenid period, Iranians, as rulers of part of the Silk Road, played a critical role in maintaining the security and infrastructure of this trade network. The Sogdians, as representatives of the eastern Iranian cultural sphere, held a particularly influential role in trade and intercultural communications from the mid-third century to the eighth century CE. Beyond their activities as merchants along the Silk Road, the Sogdians developed a form of “Silk Peace Diplomacy,” establishing a sustained presence in Chinese territories. As one of the prominent eastern Iranian groups, Sogdian merchants promoted a diplomacy of coexistence along the Silk Road. In particular, findings from northern China over the past two decades highlight the tangible and diplomatic dimensions of the Sogdian presence, emphasizing their pivotal role in what may be termed the “Silk Peace.” Archaeological excavations in northern China-notably the discovery of Sogdian family tombs-although initially reported through preliminary studies, reveal important aspects of Sogdian inscriptions, artistic expressions, spiritual beliefs, and especially mural paintings. These findings provide invaluable insight into the Sogdians’ integration into Chinese society. The primary objective of this research is to introduce the newly uncovered Sogdian cultural materials in northern China to the broader scholarly community concerned with Iranian cultural history, and to illustrate the significance of the Sogdians’ presence within their new geographical context in China. The research findings demonstrate the evolution of Sogdian communities in northern China from initially closed, self-contained groups to more open societies engaging in dynamic cultural interactions with the Chinese. It appears that the Sogdians initially migrated to China as families of artists, craftsmen, and merchants. Over time, they integrated into Chinese society while maintaining distinct aspects of their Iranian heritage, thus shaping an enduring pattern of cultural exchange between the Sogdian and Chinese civilizations.
Full-Text [PDF 4560 kb]   (279 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Interdisciplinary
Received: 2025/01/13 | Accepted: 2025/03/12 | Published: 2025/05/31

References
1. - Ashurov, B., (2020). “Religions and religious space in Sogdian culture: A view from archaeological and written sources”. Sino-Platonic Papers, (36): 1–41.
2. - Azarpay, G., (1981). Sogdian painting: The pictorial epic in Oriental art (with contributions by: A. M. Belenitskii, B. I. Marshak, & M. J. Dresden). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520333727
3. - Belenizki, A. M., (1980). Mittelasien: Kunst der Sogden. Leipzig.
4. - Chin, T., (2013). “The invention of the Silk Road, 1877”. Critical Inquiry, 40(1): 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1086/673232
5. - Compareti, M.. (2012). “Classical elements in Sogdian art: Aesop’s fables represented in the mural paintings at Penjikent”. Iranica Antiqua, 47: 301–316. https://doi.org/10.2143/IA.47.0.2141966.
6. - MacKenzie, D. N., (2000). Concise Pahlavi dictionary (M. Mirfakh raei, Trans., 2nd ed.). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
7. - De La Vaissiére, É., (2002). Histoire des marchands Sogdiens (pp. 77–85). Paris: Collège de France, Institut des hautes études chinoises.
8. - De La Vaissiére, É., (2005). “Découvertes et mises au point: Mani en Chine au VIe siècle”. Journal Asiatique, 293(1): 357–378. https://doi.org/10.2143/JA.293.1.2002085
9. - Feltham, H., (1986). Lions, silks and silver: The influence of Sasanian Persia. University of Pennsylvania.
10. - Gharib, B., (2007). Soghdian studies. By (M. Shokri fomashi).Tehran. Tahori. (in Persian).
11. - Grenet, F., (2015). “Zarathustra’s time and homeland: Geographical perspectives”. In: M. Stausberg et al. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to Zoroastrianism (pp. 19–29). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785539.ch1
12. - Grenet, F. & Sims-Williams, N., (1987). “The historical context of the Sogdian Ancient Letters”. In: Transition periods in Iranian history: Actes du Symposium de Fribourg-en-Brisgau (22–24 Mai 1985) (pp. 101–122). Leuven: L’Association pour l’avancement des études iraniennes.
13. - Hedin, S., (1938). The Silk Road. London.
14. - Henning, W. B., (1948). “The date of the Sogdian Ancient Letter”. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 12: 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00083178
15. - Hopkirk, P., (1980). Foreign devils on the Silk Road: The search for lost cities and treasures of Chinese Central Asia. University of Massachusetts Press.
16. - Lurje, P., (2017). “Sogdiana i. The name SOGD”. Encyclopædia Iranica, Retrieved from: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/sogdiana-name
17. - Mao, Y., (2023). “The influence of Tang Dynasty’s policies on Sogdian commercial networks”. International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies, 616–621. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/4/20220927
18. - Marshak, B., (2002). Legends, tales, and fables in the art of Sogdiana. Bibliotheca Persica Press.
19. - Müller, S., (2008). “Sogdier in China um 600 n. Chr. Archäologische Zeugnisse eines Lebens zwischen Assimilation und Identitätsbewahrung”. Nachrichten der Gesellschaft für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens (Hamburg), 183–184: 117–148.
20. - Qin, P., (2024). “The Sogdian rise: Revisiting factors that contributed to the success of Sogdian merchants in Gansu around 313 C.E.”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/29/20230623
21. - Richthofen, F. V., (1877). China: Ergebnisse eigener Reisen und darauf gegründeter Studien. Berlin.
22. - Stein, A., (1921). Serindia: Detailed report of explorations in Central Asia and westernmost China (Vols. 1–2). Clarendon Press.
23. - Teufer, M., (2003). “Kulturkontakte zwischen Sogdien und Baktrien am Beginn der Spätbronzezeit: Dargestellt am Grab von Zardča Chalifa”. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, 24: 121–140.
24. - Trümpler, C., (Ed.). (2008). Das grosse Spiel: Archäologie und Politik zur Zeit des Kolonialismus. Köln.
25. - Xinjiang, R., (2001). “New light on Sogdian colonies along the Silk Road: Recent archaeological finds in northern China”. Lecture at the BBAW on 20th September 2001, 147–160.
26. - Xu, J., (2019). “The funerary couch of An Jia and the art of Sogdian immigrants in sixth-century China”. The Burlington Magazine, 161: 820–829.
27. - Yatsenko, S. A., (2012). “Sogdian costume in Chinese and Sogdian art of the 6th–8th centuries”. In: G. Malinowski, A. Paroń, & B. Sz. Szmoniewski (Eds.), Serica – Da Qin: Studies in archaeology, philology and history of Sino-Western relations (pp. 101–114).
28. - Zarshenas, Z., (2001). Essays on Eastern Middle Iranian languages (V. Naddaf, Ed.). Tehran: Forouhar. (in Persian).
29. - Zhao, Y. & Ghazanfari, K., (2024). “The burial and mourning rituals of the Sogdians on the basis of Chinese historiographies”. Historical Sciences Studies, 16(1): 155–180.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.