logo
year 9, Issue 33 (12-2025)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2025, 9(33): 29-49 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aliyari A. (2025). Local Innovation and Craftsmanship: Technological Analysis (Petrography, XRD, XRF) of Late Chalcolithic Pottery from Tepe Ghabrestan, Qazvin Plain. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 9(33), 29-49. doi:10.61882/PJAS.883.1189
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-1189-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. , aliyaria@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (501 Views)
From the perspective of pottery production during the Chalcolithic period at Tepe Ghabrestan (ca. 4200–3100 BCE), the Qazvin Plain constitutes one of the most important archaeological sites in the north central Iranian Plateau. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the technology of pottery manufacture and the mineral compositions present in the ceramics. The research is significant for sourcing the provenance of Ghabrestan pottery and assessing the level of craftsmanship among its producers. The central research question concerns the quality of production and whether the pottery was locally made or imported. In this study, twenty pottery sherds from excavations at Tepe Ghabrestan selected from the ceramic repository of the Institute of Archaeology, University of Tehran were analyzed using physical tests (porosity measurement, water absorption, and density), petrography, X ray diffraction (XRD), and X ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF), to perform elemental analysis and investigate the technological processes of pottery manufacture in the Qazvin Plain during the fourth millennium BCE. The results indicate the use of advanced and specialized production technology, reflecting the potters’ skill in controlling the firing process and selecting high quality raw materials. Petrographic examination of thin sections confirmed the presence of minerals characteristic of the region, including quartz, biotite, calcite, and augite. A major finding was evidence of the use of high speed potter’s wheels in producing Ghabrestan pottery, as shown by the uniform wall thickness and smooth surface finishes. Microscopic analysis confirmed the presence of inorganic tempers (mineral additives) incorporated to enhance mechanical properties and reduce cracking during firing. The clay used matches the geological composition of the Qazvin Plain, indicating local production of the pottery.
 
Full-Text [PDF 1745 kb]   (157 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Interdisciplinary
Received: 2025/05/27 | Accepted: 2025/08/25 | Published: 2025/12/22

References
1. - Asadi Ojaei, S. K., Abbasnejad, R., Fazeli Nashli, H. & Valipour, H. R., (2019). “Analysis Socio-Economic Complexitiesof the Societies of the Central Plateau of Iran During 5th Millennium B.C.E. on the Basis of Pottery Technology”. Archaeological Research of Iran, 9(20), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2019.16225.1739
2. - Emami, S. M. A., Volkmar, J. & Trettin, R., (2008). “Quantitative characterisation of damage mechanisms in ancient ceramics by quantitative X-ray powder diffraction, polarisation microscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy and non-contact mode atomic force microscopy”. Surface Engineering, 24(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329408X298157
3. - Fazeli Nashli, H., (2004). “Relative and absolute chronology of Tepe Ghabrestan, Qazvin Plain”. Archaeological Reports, 3: 37–50.
4. - Fazeli Nashli, H., (2006a). “Archaeological investigations in the Qazvin Plain in 2003”. In: Archaeology of the Qazvin Plain (pp. 211–273). Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
5. - Fazeli Nashli, H., (2006b). Political and social changes in the Qazvin Plain: Excavations at Tepe Ghabrestan, season III. Tehran: Archaeological Research Center, Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization.
6. - Fazeli Nashli, H. & Schmidt, A., (2006). “Tepe Ghabrestan: Geophysical survey report”. The International Journal of Humanities, 13(3), 31–50. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25382640.2006.13.3.5.7
7. - Fazeli, H. & Jamali, M., (2002, November 8–9). “Explaining the process of specialized pottery production in the prehistoric village of Zagheh, based on archaeological studies and petrography results”. In: Proceedings of the First Symposium on Archaeometry in Iran: The Role of Basic Sciences in Archaeology (pp. xx–xx). Tehran: Archaeological Research Center, Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization.
8. - Fazeli, H., Wong, E. H. & Potts, D. T., (2005). “The Qazvin Plain revisited: A reappraisal of the chronology of northwestern Central Plateau, Iran, in the 6th to the 4th millennium BC”. Ancient Near Eastern Studies, 42(3): xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.42.0.2004448
9. - Goffer, Z. (2007). Archaeological chemistry. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471915254
10. - Hadian Dehkordi, M., (2007). “Application of laboratory research in the conservation and restoration of historic buildings (materials and structures)”. Tehran: Conservation and Restoration Research Institute, University of Tehran.
11. - Klein, C. & Hurlbut, C. S., Jr., (1993). Manual of mineralogy (21st ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
12. - Majidzadeh, Y., (1976). The early prehistoric cultures of the Central Plateau of Iran: An archaeological history of its development during the fifth and fourth millennia BC (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago.
13. - Majidzadeh, Y., (1977). “Excavations at Tepe Ghabrestan, Sagzabad”. Marlik, 2: 53–71.
14. - Majidzadeh, Y., (1981). “Sialk III and the pottery sequence at Tepe Ghabrestan: The coherence of the cultures of the Central Iranian Plateau”. Iran, 19(1): 141–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/4299711
15. - Majidzadeh, Y., (1991). “Archaeology and pottery”. Archaeology and History, 5(2): 4–14.
16. - Matthews, R. & Fazeli Nashli, H., (2022). The archaeology of Iran from the Palaeolithic to the Achaemenid Empire. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003224129
17. - Nosrati, S., (2011). Study of fourth millennium BCE pottery technology using XRD and XRF laboratory methods in north central Iran (Case study: Sialk III, Arisman I, and Ghabrestan II pottery) (Master’s thesis). University of Isfahan, Faculty of Conservation.
18. - Pollard, A. M., Davoudi, H., Mostafapour, I., Valipour, H. R. & Fazeli Nashli, H., (2012). “A new radiocarbon chronology for the late Neolithic to Iron Age in the Qazvin Plain, Iran”. The International Journal of Humanities, 19(3): 110–151. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25382640.2012.19.3.3.7
19. - Riederer, J., (2004). “Thin section microscopy applied to the study of archaeological ceramics”. Hyperfine Interactions, 154(1–4): 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYPE.0000032029.24557.b1
20. - Schmidt, A. & Fazeli, H., (2007). “Tepe Ghabrestan: A Chalcolithic tell buried in alluvium”. Archaeological Prospection, 14(1): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.291
21. - Talaei, H., (2013). Prehistory of Iran: The Chalcolithic Age. Tehran: SAMT.
22. - Talaei, H., (2014). Eight thousand years of pottery in Iran. Tehran: SAMT.
23. - Talaei, H., Aliyari, A. & Zoghi, Y., (2009). “Study of fifth millennium BCE pottery technology using XRD and XRF laboratory methods in north central Iran”. Archaeological Studies, 1: 65–84. https://jarcs.ut.ac.ir/article_28631.html?lang=en
24. - Yosefi, R., Zeighmi, M. & Baghizadeh, S., (2018). “Classification and Typology of Late Chalcolithic Period’s Pottery Culture of Northern Central of Iran’s Plateau in light of Northern Mound’s Findings of MeymanatAbad Tepe”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 10(1): 227-246. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2018.219039.142346

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.