logo
year 9, Issue 34 (3-2026)                   Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud. 2026, 9(34): 65-93 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tahmasebifar H, Fazeli Nesheli H, Safari M, Thomalsky J, Nokandeh J, Eskandari N. (2026). The Structure of Burial Practices in the Iron Age of Mazandaran: The Case Study of Shahneh Poshte Cemetery, Babol. Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.. 9(34), 65-93. doi:10.61882/PJAS.1188.302.1
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-1188-en.html
1- Phd in Archeology, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Professor, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author). , hfazelin@ut.ac.ir
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
4- PhD in Archaeology, Director of the German Archaeological Center in Iran, Berlin, Germany.
5- Assistant Professor, Iranian Center for Archaeology (ICAR), Research Insitute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran (RICHT) & Assisant Professor, Iranian Center for Archaeology (ICAR), Research Insitute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran (RICHT), Tehran, Iran.
6- Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. & Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (197 Views)
Abstract
A series of field activities including two seasons of survey and excavation at the Shahneh Poshte cemetery of Babol on the northern slopes of the Alborz Mountains in central Mazandaran in 2018 and 2019 resulted in the discovery of a collection of human graves and burials scattered throughout this 11-hectare site. Due to the mass of destruction caused by unauthorized excavations in the cemetery, several disturbed graves were observed without any classifiable information. In contrast, by conducting scientific excavations in the 16 trenches, a total of 39 identifiable and Readable human burials were found and then the collection of information and archaeological findings related to each burial was recorded and classified. In this study, we attempt to answer questions about the existence of possible burial methods and patterns and the meaningful characteristics of these variables by studying a set of different aspects including burial practices such as the position and orientation of the body, position of face of hands, architectural structure of the graves, gender and age of skeletons, individual and group burials, and burials with and without objects. The results of absolute dating and comparative studies indicate that this cemetery belongs to a long time span from the 11th and 12th centuries BC (Iron I) to the 4th and 3rd centuries BC, i.e. the Achaemenid to the early Parthian period (Iron IV), and therefore cultural materials of this cemetery are comparable to intra-regional ancient sites in Mazandaran as well as trans-regional sites in the Gorgan Plain, the Central Plateau, and especially the Gilan region. Our research also shows that the Shahneh Poshte graves follow a specific pattern in some burial aspects including the supine position and the direction of the face to the south and therefore have long-term burial traditions. 
Keywords: Shahneh Poshte Cemetery, Burial Practices, Iron Age, Mazandaran, Cultural Communications.

Introduction
The Shahneh Pashte cemetery is located adjacent to village of Kamikola and southwest of the Khoshrudpey city and 21 kilometers south of the Babol (Fig. 1) (Saedian, 2014: 321). This cemetery was excavated over two seasons in 2018 and 2019 by Hassan Fazeli Nashli. The result of these excavations was the identification of 39 human burials in situ (28 graves) (Fig. 2) which provide a set of valuable archaeological data such as absolute and relative dating, burial methods including the position and orientation of the bodies and faces, the position of the hands and the structure of graves. Based on the whole of archaeological data, the site can be dated to the late 2nd millennium B.C (late Iron I) to the mid-1st millennium B.C (Iron IV, 3rd - 4th centuries B.C / Achaemenid to early Parthian). More precisely, the absolute dating on 5 skeletons uphold this period. Based on archaeological studies between 39 burials, 29 burials belong to the late Iron I (late 2nd millennium BC) to Iron III (burials 1-11 and 22-39) are called “Iron age I - III Group” and the other 10 burials (burials 12-21) can be dated to the 4th and 3rd centuries B.C (late Achaemenid to early Parthian) that are called “Iron age IV Group”, considering the absolute dates of the two burials and their spatial relationship.

Discussion
The study of the Shahneh Poshte burials shows that a set of methods were used to place the deceased in grave which are divided into two general categories: lying on the sides and supine. These two general modes include a total of 11 sub-modes. In general, in the entire Iron Age in this site (I-IV), the lying on the sides includes 13 burials (33.3%) including 4 burials on the right and 9 burials on the left, supine 15 burials (38.5%) and also 11 burials (28.2%) lack any recognizable signs. In more detail, during the Iron I-III period, there were 8 contracted burials (28% of total) of which 4 were on the right and 4 on the left. In addition, 12 burials (41% of total) were buried in supine. Also, 9 burials (31% of total) were of unknown status. In the Iron IV, there were 5 contracted burials (50% of total) all of which were on the left and no right-sided burials were found. Moreover, 3 burials (30% of total) were buried in supine. Finally, 2 burials (20% of period) were classified as undetermined burials due to extensive damages (Fig. 3-5). Regarding the position of the hands of the skeletons, during the Iron I-IV, a total of 16 positions were observed which can be classified into three general groups: lying on the sides, supine and unknown. In addition, the first group includes 6 subgroups (25% of all), the second group is divided into 9 subgroups (54% of all) and the third group is divided into 9 cases (21% of all) as unknown (Fig. 6-7). In Shahneh Poshte, three types of grave architecture have been identified. The first is a simple pit, second is a simple pit with a clay cover and the third is a pithos. Of the 28 graves in site, 26 graves (93% of all) are simple oval pits, of which 20 graves belong to the Iron I-III (71.6%) and 6 graves (21.4%) belong to the Iron IV. The second method, a simple pit covered with big clay fragments includes only 1 is from Iron Age I-III (3.5% of total). Also the pithos burial consists of only 1 grave (3.5% of total) from Iron Age IV (Fig. 8-10). In terms of gender and age of the deceased in this cemetery, total of 9 burials (23% of all) were identified as male, including 8 burials (27.6%) in Iron I-III and 1 burial (10%) in Iron IV. In addition, there were 14 burials (36% of total) as female including 12 burials (27.6%) in Iron I-III and 2 burials (20%) in Iron IV. Also, of the total burials, 16 burials (41% of total) were disturbed (Fig. 11-17). In addition, 7 different positions of the bodies were identified in relation to geographical directions including: south-north 5% of all, east-west 2.5%, west-east 23%, northeast-southwest 10.5% of all, southwest-northeast 10.5%, southeast-northwest 10.5%, northwest-southeast 15% and also an unknown direction 23% of all burials (Fig. 18-19). It is worth noting that for the orientation of face, during all periods, the dominant method was the south direction with a total of 23% of all burials, and especially 20.5% of all in Iron I-III, it was certainly the most common burial method. It seems that this method was not a priority in the Iron IV and was used less often. After that, the north direction was the most common method with 15.3% including 10.2% in Iron IV and 5.1% in Iron I-III (Fig. 20-21). Regarding other study characteristics, 67.8% of the total graves are individual and 32.2% are group graves. Among the first group, 53.5% of the total is related to Iron I-III and 14.6% are related to Iron IV. In addition, group graves comprise 32.2% of the total graves of which 621.5% are related to Iron I-III and 310.5% are related to Iron IV (Fig. 22-25). Finally, about the possession of objects, in total, 70% of all burials were buried with burial objects and 30% did not contain any goods (Fig. 26-27). Finally, regarding the amount of possession of objects, in total, 27 burials (70% of all) were buried with burial objects, and only 12 burials (30% of total) did not contain any burial objects or grave goods.

Discussion 
Human skeletons in Shahneh Poshte cemetery are mostly buried in individual and group graves, including 28 graves which mostly include simple pits, one case of a simple pit with a clay cover and one pithos. In fact, the architectural of the graves was mostly in form of simple pits. A simple pit grave with a clay cover is quite unique in this site and a similar the grave has apparently been found only in one grave in the Lefork cemetery of Savadkuh which has been dated to Iron Age III (Abedini, 2017: 154). Third group of tombs is pithos type that has many similar older and contemporary examples in Mazandaran county. Among the numerous similar examples in the Iron Age of Mazandaran, can mention the children’s tombs in Gohar Tepe (Piller and Mahfroozi, 2009: 19) and cemetery Amirkola in Savadkuh (Abedini, 2017: 154), as well as Qaleh Kuti I cemetery (Fukai and Ikeda, 1971: Pl. XIX, Fig. 2) and Kaluraz in Gilan (Fahimi, 2002: 106-107), Tepe Gyan (Contenau and Girshman, 1935: 12), Maral Tepe of Uzbeki (Majidzadeh, 2008: 135-136) and Dinkhah Tepe (Muscaerella, 1974: 75). In addition, this method reached its peak of use during the Parthian period such as Taq bustan in Kermanshah (Kambakh Fard, 1998: 45), Liarsang-Ben cemetery in Gilan (Jahani et al., 2023: 38; Jahani et al., 2018: 114), and especially in the central Zagros basin (Mohammadi Far and Hojabari Nobari, 2004) such as Sanandaj (Khosravi et al., 2018: 317), Marivan (Mohammadi Far and Sarraf, 2006; Masoumian and Rahimi-Galugahi, 2012: 428) and several points in the city of Hamadan and its surrounding areas (Azarnoush, 1975: 56, vol. 7; Dailer et al., 2013). The graves of Shahneh Poshte are scattered in different parts of the cemetery and it does not seem that a specific space of the cemetery was dedicated to a specific group or class of people in this society. The group graves are in the form of two-burial and three-burial graves with a slight difference in depth and space compared to each other, although the attribution of some of these group burials to each other has been ambiguous. However, the spatial proximity of the skeletons and their burial objects and the difficulty in distinguishing them from each other led to the attribution of some of them to a single grave and it seems that even despite a slight difference in depth, there was a clear awareness in creating a single grave for multiple skeletons. Usually, the deceased were placed in the grave in various positions, either contracted (lying on their sides) or supine with different positions inclined to the right or left. The positions of the hands are usually in front of the chest and face and sometimes in line with the body and the legs are also bent in three different degrees: less than a 90-degree angle (high, inclined inward towards the abdomen and spine: grade 1), 90-degree angle (medium, perpendicular angle to the spine: grade 2), and more than 90-degree angle (low, open angle to the spine: grade 3). A few are also supine and extended in line with the body.

Conclusion
The study of the burials of the Shahneh Poshte cemetery shows that there were a group of methods and rituals related to the burial of the dead, some of which were used more than others and, in other words, became a burial tradition. Regarding the position of the dead during the Iron Age and during the use of this cemetery, all the conventional methods of placing the deceased in the grave were used in the Shahneh Poshte area and despite the slightly higher number of supine method, it does not have a significant advantage over the lying on sides method and both methods can be seen as burial methods and traditions in great abundance. Also, the supine method was the most common burial method among women with 71% and men did not have any dominant method. In the discussion of the architectural structure of the tomb, the common tradition and method, the usual method is a simple oval pit but there are two unique methods, one is a simple pit grave covered with pottery fragments and the other is a pithos burial, each of which was used in the form of a grave only as a specific method, not a burial tradition. Finally, based on the set of burial characteristics of the Shahneh Poshte cemetery, it can be seen that this site is comparable in many aspects to sites within the region in Mazandaran and adjacent the region especially Gilan and the Central Plateau. It can also be considered that the set of burial methods and traditions of the Shahneh Poshte cemetery is homogeneous and identical to other contemporary sites in Mazandaran and to some extent a continuation of some pre-Iron Age burial methods in this region.
Full-Text [PDF 1686 kb]   (64 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2025/05/17 | Accepted: 2025/07/20 | Published: 2026/03/20

References
1. - آذرنوش، مسعود، (1354). «کاوش‌های گورستان محوطه سنگ شیر». گزارش‌های سومین مجمع سالانه کاوش‌ها و پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی در ایران، زیرنظر: فیروز باقرزاده، مرکز باستان‌شناسی ایران تهران: 51-70.
2. - امیرکلایی، ابراهیم، (1387). «گزارش گمانه‌زنی به‌منظور تعیین عرصه و حریم محوطۀ قلعه‌کش دابودشت شهرستان آمل، مازندران». اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان مازندران، (منتشرنشده).
3. - امیرکلایی، ابراهیم، (1388). «گزارش دومین فصل کاوش محوطۀ قلعه‌کش دابودشت شهرستان آمل، مازندران». اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان مازندران، (منتشرنشده).
4. - امیرکلایی، ابراهیم، (1389). «گزارش گمانه زنی به منظور تعیین عرصه و حریم محوطه لامیزده شهرستان محمود آباد، مازندران». اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان مازندران، (منتشرنشده).
5. - امیرکلایی، ابراهیم، (1391). «گزارش فصل سوم کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی محوطۀ قلعه کِش شهرستان آمل، مازندران». سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، (منتشر نشده).
6. - جهانی، ولی؛ چرمچیان، مجتبی؛ محبوبی، سارا؛ روحانی رانکوهی، مانا؛ و برقعی، سارا، (1397). «سومین فصل از پژوهش‌های میدانی در لیارسنگبن املش؛ یک گورستان دورۀ اشکانی در کرانه‌های شمالی البرز مرکزی». گزارش‌های شانزدھمین گردھمایی سالانه باستان‌شناسی ایران (مجموعه مقالات سال 1396)، به‌کوشش: روح‌الله شیرازی، انتشارات پژوھشگاه میراث‌فرھنگی و گردشگری، تهران، صص. 114-122.
7. - خسروی، شکوه؛ مصطفی‌پور، سامان؛ و علی‌بیگی، سجاد، (1401). «فصل دوم گمانه‌زنی در محوطه‌های محدوده سد بلبر (ساختگاه نی آباد) استان کردستان». مجموعه مقالات کوتاه نوزدهمین گردهمایی سالانه باستان‌شناسی ایران 1400، گردآوری: فرشید مصدقی امینی و محمد مرتضایی، انتشارات پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری، تهران: 315-323.
8. - دایلر، علیرضا؛ محمدی‌فر، یعقوب؛ و حسنلو، سمیه، (1392). «تدفین‌های دورۀ اشکانی شهر همدان». مجموعه مقالات باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ شهر همدان به مناسبت یکصدمین سالگرد کاوش در همدان، گردآورنده: علی هژبری، انتشارات پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری، تهران، چاپ نخست: 189-198.
9. - درویش‌روحانی، موسی، (1356). «گزارش بررسی شمال ایران». سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
10. - دهستانی‌کلاگر، محمد، (1391). «گاهنگاری نسبی استقرارهای باستانی شهرستان بابل از دورۀ نوسنگی تا عصر آهن». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، (منتشر نشده).
11. - سعیدیان، سعدی؛ دهستانی‌کلاگر، محمد؛ و قلی‌زاده، فاطمه، (1393). «لزوم به کارگیری روش‌های متفاوت در بررسی‌های باستان‌شناختی مناطق شمالی کشور؛ بررسی باستان‌شناسی پیش‌ازتاریخ شهرستان بابل». مجموعه مقالات چهارمین همایش بین‌المللی باستان‌شناسان جوان، تهران، چاپ نخست: 311-324.
12. - عابدینی‌عراقی، مهدی، (1396). «بررسی استقرارهای عصر آهن III در منطقه مرکزی مازندران». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، (منتشر نشده).
13. - فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن، (1397). «گزارش فصل اول کاوش محوطه‌های بزرودپی (قلعه بن) و شهنه‌پشته شهر خشرودپی شهرستان بابل». پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی، پژوھشگاه میراث‌فرھنگی و گردشگری، (منتشر نشده).
14. - فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن، (1399). «گزارش کاوش در محوطۀ شهنه‌پشته شهرستان بابل». پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی، پژوھشگاه میراث‌فرھنگی و گردشگری، (منتشر نشده).
15. - فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن، (1400). «گزارش مقدماتی تعیین عرصه و پیشنهاد حریم محوطۀ ورهوتو بهشهر». پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی، پژوھشگاه میراث‌فرھنگی و گردشگری، (منتشر نشده).
16. - فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن؛ صفری، مجتبی؛ طهماسبی‌فر، حامد؛ و تومالسکی، یودیت، (1404). «گاهنگاری مطلق و مقایسه‌ای عصر آهن و دورۀ تاریخی مازندران با تأکید بر داده‌های باستان‌شناختی محوطۀ شهنه پشته بابل». مطالعات باستان شناسی، 8 (1): 107-164. https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2025.324252.143379
17. - فهیمی، حمید، (1381). فرهنگ عصر آهن در کرانه‌های جنوب‌غربی دریای خزر از دیدگاه باستان‌شناسی. تهران: انتشارات سمیرا، چاپ نخست.
18. - ماهفروزی، علی، (1382). «گزارش 3 فصل بررسی باستان‌شناسی شرق مازندران، 1379 تا 1382، مازندران». سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور (منتشرنشده).
19. - ماهفروزی، علی، (1389). «گزارش توصیفی کاوش‌های باستان‌شناسی گوهرتپه: رستمکلا، مازندران». سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، (منتشر نشده).
20. - مدودسکایا، یانا، (1383). ایران در عصر آهن 1. ترجمۀ علی‌اکبر وحدتی، چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی.
21. - کامبخش‌فرد، سیف‌الله، (1377). گورخمره‌های اشکانی، باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ. پیوست شمارۀ 1، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی، چاپ نخست.
22. - مجیدزاده، یوسف، (1389). کاوش‌های محوطۀ باستانی ازبکی. جلد اول: هنر و معماری، اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان .
23. - محمدی‌فر، یعقوب؛ و هژبری‌نوبری، علیرضا، (1383). «نگرشی بر آیین تدفین گورخمره ای دوران اشکانی در حاشیه غربی زاگرس‌مرکزی (مریوان)». پیام باستان‌شناس، 2: 29-42. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/peb/Article/935531
24. - معصومیان، محمد؛ و رحیمی‌گلوگاهی، مرضیه، (1391). «باستان‌شناسی استان کردستان». مجموعه مقالات 80 سال باستان‌شناسی ایران، به‌کوشش: یوسف حسن‌زاده و سیما میری، نشر پازینه، تهران، چاپ نخست: 421-433.
25. - نورانی، یزدان، (1372). «بررسی و شناسایی آثار موجود در منطقه میانی شهرستان‌های ساری - بابل و بابلسر». تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی، (منتشر نشده).
26. - نورانی، یزدان، (1375). «گزارش بررسی حدفاصل رود تجن و نکارود». سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، (منتشر نشده).
27. - نیکخواه، محمدجعفر، (1376). «بررسی شناسایی آثار موجود در حد فاصل رودخانه هراز شهرستان آمل و رودخانۀ لاویج شهرستان نور، مازندران». سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور، (منتشر نشده).
28. - واندنبــرگ، لوئــی، (1348). باستانشناســی ایــران باســتان.گنجینــه باستان شناســی ایــران شــمارۀ 2. ترجمــۀ عیسـی بهنـام، تهـران: دانشـگاه تهـران
30. References
31. - Abedini Araghi, M., (2017). “A Study of Iron Age III Settlements in the Central Region of Mazandaran”. M.A. Thesis in Archaeology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, (unpublished). (In Persian).
32. - Amirkolaei, E., (2008). “Report on the sounding to determine the area and boundaries of the Qale Kash Dabudasht site in Amol County”. Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts Organization of Mazandaran province (unpublished), (in Persian).
33. - Amirkolaei, E., (2009). “Report on the second season of excavation of the Qaleh Kash Dabudasht site in Amol, Mazandaran”. Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts Organization of Mazandaran province (unpublished), (in Persian)
34. - Amirkolaei, E., (2010). “Report on the sounding to determine the area and boundaries of the Lamizdeh site in Mahmood’Abad County, Mazandaran”. Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts Organization of Mazandaran province(unpublished), (in Persian).
35. - Amirkolaei, E., (2012). “Report on the third season of excavation of the Qaleh Kash Dabudasht site in Amol”. Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts Organization of Mazandaran province (unpublished), (in Persian).
36. - Azarnoush, M. & Helwing, B., (2005). “Recent archaeological research in Iran–prehistory to Iron Age”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan. 37: 189-246.
37. - Azarnoosh, M., (1975). “Excavations of the Sangshir Cemetery”. Reports of the Third Annual Conference on Archaeological Explorations and Research in Iran, under the supervision of Firouz Bagherzadeh, Iranian Archaeological Center, Tehran: 51-70. (In Persian).
38. - Contenau, G. & Ghirshman, R., (1933). “Rapport préliminaire sur les fouilles de Tépé-Giyan, près Néhavend (Perse)”. Syria, 14 (1): 1-11.
39. - Contenau, G. & Ghirshman, R., (1935). Fouilles de Tépé Giyan, près du Néhavend, 1931 et 1932. Musée du Louvre - Département des Antiquités Orientales. Série Archéologique III, Paris.
40. - Coon, C. S., (1951). Cave Explorations In Iran 1949. Museum Monographs, The University Museum, University of Pensylvania Press, Philadelphia. https://doi:10.1017/S0079497X00013955
41. - Coon, C. S., (1952). “Excavations in Hotu Cave, Iran, A Preliminary Report”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 96 (3): 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1954.56.5.02a00480
42. - Dailer, A., Mohammadifar, Y. & Hassanloo, S., (2013). “Parthian Burials in Hamadan City”. A Collection of Archaeological and Historical Articles on Hamedan Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the First Season of Excavations in Hamedan, edited by: Ali Hojabari, Research Center of Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, Tehran, First Edition: 189-198. (In Persian).
43. - Danti, M. D., (2013). Hasanlu V The Late Bronze Age and Iron Age I Periods, Hasanlu Excavation Reports III. University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia.
44. - Darvish Rouhani, M., (1977). “Report on the Survey of Northern Iran”. Cultural Heritage Organization. (In Persian).
45. - Dehestani Kolagar, M., (2012). “Relative Chronology of Ancient Settlements in Babol County from the Neolithic to the Iron Age”. M.A. Thesis in Archaeology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, (unpublished), (In Persian).
46. - Dyson, R. H. J., (1965). “Problems of Protohistoric Iran as Seen from Hasanlu”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 24 (3): 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/371815
47. - Fahimi, H., (2002). Iron Age culture on the southwestern shores of the Caspian Sea from an archaeological perspective. Tehran: Samira Publications, first edition. (In Persian).
48. - Fazeli Nashli, H., (2018). “Report on the first season of the excavation of the sites of Bazrudpi (Qala'e Ben) and Shahne Poshte, Kheshrudpi, Babol County”, ICHTO, (unpublished), (In Persian).
49. - Fazeli Nashli, H., (2019). “Report on the excavation of Shahne Poshte, Babol County”. ICHTO, (unpublished), (In Persian).
50. - Fazeli Nashli, H., (2020). “Preliminary report on the determination of the area and the proposed boundary of the Verhotu in Behshahr”. ICHTO, (unpublished), (In Persian).
51. - Fazeli Nashli, H., Safari, M., Tahmasebi Far. H. & Thomalsky, J., (2025). “Absolute and Comparative Chronology of the Iron Age and historical period of Mazandaran with Emphasis on archaeological data from the Shahneh Poshte cemetery of Babol”. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 18 (1): 107-164, (In Perian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jarcs.2025.324252.143379
52. - Fukai, S. & Ikeda, J., (1971). Dailaman IV: The Excavations at Ghalekuti II & I, 1964. Volume 12 of Tokyo University Iraq-Iran Archaeological Expedition, Reports 12, University of Tokyo, Institute of Oriental Culture, Tokyo.
53. - Girshman, R., (1939). Fouilles de Sialk près de Kashan, 1933, 1934, 1937. Vol. II, Musée du Louvre, Département des Antiquités Orientales, Série archéologique, Tome V.
54. - Jahani, V., Charmchian, M., Mahboubi, S., Rohani Rankohi, M. & Borqei S., (2018). “The third season of field research at Liar Sangban Amlash; A Parthian Period Cemetery on the Northern Banks of the Central Alborz Mountains”. Reports of the 16th Annual Conference on Iranian Archaeology (Collection of Papers for 2017), edited by: Ruhollah Shirazi, ICHTO, Tehran: 114-122. (In Persian).
55. - Jahani, V., Raof, S., Chrmchian, M., Mahboubi, S. & Rouhani, M., (2023). “Classification, Typology, and Relative Chronology of Personal Ornaments from the Ancient Cemetery of Liār-Sang-Bon, Amlash, Iran”. The International Journal of Ancient Iranian Studies, 3 (5): 37-49.
56. - Kambakhshfard, S., (1998). Parthian tombs, archaeology and history. Appendix No. 1, University Publishing Center, Tehran, first edition. (In Persian).
57. - Khosravi, Sh., Mostafapour, I. & Alibeigi, S., (2023). “Second season of sounding in the Areas of the Belbar Dam (Ney Abad Structure) in Kurdistan Province”. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Iranian Archaeological Conference, 2022, edited d by: Farshid Mossadeghi Amini and Mohammad Mortezaei, ICHTO, Tehran: 315-323. (In Persian).
58. - Mahforuzi, A., (2003). “Report of the 3rd Season of the Archaeological Survey of East Mazandaran, 2000 to 2004, Mazandaran”. National Cultural Heritage Organization, (unpublished), (In Persian).
59. - Mahforuzi, A., (2010). “Descriptive report of archaeological excavations in Gohar Tepe: Rostamkola, Mazandaran”. Archives of the National Cultural Heritage Organization, (unpublished), (In Persian).
60. - Majidzadeh, Y., (2010). Excavations of the ancient site of Ozbeki, Volume One: Art and Architecture, General Department of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of Tehran Province, Tehran, first edition. (In Persian).
61. - Muscarella, O. W., (1973). “Excavations at Agrab Tepe, Iran”. Metropolitan Museum of Art Journal, 8: 47-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-024-09183-z
62. - Muscarella, O. W., (1974). “The Iron Age at Dinkha Tepe, Iran”. Metropolitan Museum Journal, 9: 35-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.2022.2037102
63. - Masoumian, M. & Rahimi-Glougahi, M., (2012). “Archaeology of Kurdistan Province”. Collection of Articles on 80 Years of Iranian Archaeology, edited by: Yousef Hassanzadeh and Sima Miri, Pazineh Publishment, Tehran, First Edition: 421-433. (In Persian).
64. - McBurney, C. B. M., (1968). “The Cave of Ali Teppeh and the Epipalaeolithic in N.E Iran”. Proceedings of the Prehisoric Society, 12: 385-413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00013955
65. - Mohammadifar, Y. & Hojbari Nobari, A., (2004). “A perspective on the burial ritual of the Parthian tombs on the western edge of the Central Zagros (Marivan)”. Payam Bastan-shenas, 2: 29-42. (In Persian).
66. - Mohammadifar, Y. & Sarraf, M. R., (2006). “A Glance at Burial Rites in Pithos of Arsacids era Located in Western Region of Central Zagros (Marivan)”. The International Journal of Humanities, 13 (3): 51-62. http://eijh.modares.ac.ir/article-27-786-en.html
67. - Nikkhah, M. J., (1997). “Investigation of the identification of existing artifacts between the Haraz River in Amol County and the Lavij River in Noor County, Mazandaran”. Cultural Heritage Organization, (unpublished), (In Persian).
68. - Noorani, Y., (1993). “Investigation and Identification of the Existing Artifacts in the Middle Area of Sari-Babol and Babolsar Counties”. Cultural Heritage Organization, (unpublished), (In Persian).
69. - Noorani, Y., (1996). “Report on the investigation of the boundary between the Tajan and Nekarud rivers”. Cultural Heritage Organization, (unpublished), (In Persian).
70. - Overlaet, B., (2005). “The chronology of the Iron Age in the Pusht-i Kuh, Luristan”. Iranica Antiqua, 40: 1-33. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-303899
71. - Pigott, V. C., (1981). “The Adoption of Iron in Western Iran in The Early First Millennium B.C.: An Archaeometallurgical Study”. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pensylvanya (Unpublished).
72. - Piller, C. K. & Mahfroozi, A., (2009). “First preliminary report on the joint Iranian-German excavations at Gohar Tappe, Mazandaran, Iran”. Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan, 41: 177-209.
73. - Saeedian, S., Dehestani Kolagar, M. & Gholizadeh, F., (2014). “The Need for Using Different Methods in Archaeological Surveys of the Northern Regions of the Country; A Study of Prehistoric Archaeology in Babol County”. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Young Archaeologists, Tehran, First Edition: 311-324. (In Persian).
74. - Young, T., C., (1965). “A comparative ceramic chronology for western Iran, 1500-500 B.C.”. Iran, 3: 53-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.1965.11834401
75. - Young, T. C., (1967). “The Iranian Migration into the Zagros”. Iran, 5: 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.1967.11834760

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.