Volume 8, Issue 4 (3-2026)                   KCR 2026, 8(4): 79-91 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rahmani G, Nezafati N, Hessari M. Archaeometric and Conservation Study of Early Elamite Mudbricks from the Sofalin Mound, Pishva. KCR 2026; 8 (4) :79-91
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-390-en.html
Research Center for Restoration and Conservation, Richt, Tehran Iran.
Abstract:   (1844 Views)
The Sofalin Mound is located north of the city of Pishva, on natural hills formed by early Holocene deposits (alluvial sediments older than 4,000 years). Systematic and continuous excavations at the Sofalin Mound have been carried out over the past several years in seven seasons as part of broader archaeological investigations in the VaraminPishva Plain. Cultural materials recovered from the Sofalin Mound in the north-central Iranian Plateau have significantly enhanced our understanding of the proto-literate period, dated between 3500 and 2800 BCE, within the cultural sphere of the north-central plateau of Iran. During the sixth and seventh excavation seasons at the Sofalin site, architectural spaces were uncovered in Trench 20. These spaces were documented as featuring cobblestone floors, mudbrick platforms, and rectilinear architectural layouts. Based on ceramic assemblages (plain and painted), clay sealings, and fragmented clay tablets, occupation during different phases of the Early Elamite cultural period was identified. This research focuses on the technical and laboratory investigation of Early Elamite mudbrick architectural remains from the Sofalin Mound using X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, complemented by chemical studies aimed at proposing appropriate conservation strategies. The primary objective of this study is to achieve a semi-quantitative structural characterization of mudbricks from this period in order to enhance our understanding of their mineralogical composition. Such knowledge contributes to the development of effective conservation approaches for the Sofalin Mound as well as other contemporaneous mudbrick archaeological sites.
Full-Text [PDF 721 kb]   (337 Downloads)    

References
1. Aurenche, O. (1981). Répartition chronologique et spatiale de quelques traits architecturaux du Proche Orient ancien. In Préhistoire du Levant (pp. 503–). Éditions du CNRS.
2. Bernbeck, R., Hessari, M., Pollock, S., Rol, N., & Akbari, H. (2020). Soundings at three Chalcolithic sites in the Varamin Plain, 2018. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan, 49, 51–77.
3. Cronin, J. S., Neall, V. E., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Investigation of an aggrading paleosol developed into andesitic ring-plain deposits, Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. Geoderma, 69(1–3), 119–135.
4. Dahl, J., Hessari, M., & Yousefi, R. (2013). The proto-Elamite tablets from Tepe Sofalin. Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies, 2(1), 57–73.
5. Drees, L. R., Wilding, L. P., Smeck, N. E., & Senkayi, A. L. (1989). Silica in soils: Quartz and disordered silica polymorphs. In J. B. Dixon & S. W. Buol (Eds.), Minerals in soil environments (2nd ed., pp. 913–974). Soil Science Society of America.
6. Gualtieri, A., & Bertolani, M. (1992). Mullite and cristobalite formation in fired products starting from halloysitic clay. Applied Clay Science, 7(4), 251–262.
7. Gutiérrez-Castorena, M. del C., & Effland, W. R. (2021). Pedogenic and biogenic siliceous features. In Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths (2nd ed., Chapter 21). Elsevier.
8. Haghi-Pour, A. (1986). The 1:250,000 geologic map of Tehran. Geological Survey of Iran.
9. Hessari, M., Bernbeck, R., & Pollock, S. (2021). A brief report on new radiocarbon dates from Tappeh Sofalin, Pishva, Iran. Journal of Archaeological Studies, 12(4), 49–60.
10. Huff, D. (2012). Gypsum. In Encyclopaedia Iranica (Vol. XI, Fasc. 4, pp. 411–412). https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/gypsum
11. Kenyon, K. (1957). Digging up Jericho. Ernest Benn.
12. Kingery, W. D., Vandiver, P. B., & Prickett, M. (1988). The beginnings of pyrotechnology, Part II: Production and use of lime and gypsum plaster in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic Near East. Journal of Field Archaeology, 15(2), 219–244.
13. Maggetti, M. (1982). Phase analysis and its significance for technology and origin. In J. S. Olin & A. D. Franklin (Eds.), Archaeological ceramics (pp. 121–133). Smithsonian Institution Press.
14. Pavía, S. (2006). The determination of brick provenance and technology using analytical techniques from the physical sciences. Archaeometry, 48(2), 201–218.
15. Peters, T., & Iberg, R. (1978). Mineralogical changes during firing of calcium-rich brick clays. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 57(5), 503–509.
16. Rehhoff, L., Akkermans, P., Leonardsen, E., & Thuesen, I. (1990). Plasters: Gypsum or calcite? A preliminary case study of Syrian plasters. Paléorient, 16(2), 79–.
17. Rollefson, G. (1989). The uses of plaster at Neolithic ʿAin Ghazal, Jordan. Archeomaterials, 3(1), 33–.
18. Schmidt, J. (1972). 26. und 27. vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka 1968-1969. Gebr. Mann.
19. Sommer, M., Kaczorek, D., Kuzyakov, Y., & Breuer, J. (2006). Silicon pools and fluxes in soils and landscapes A review. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 169(3), 310–329.
20. Zahedi, M., Hessari, M., Amiri, M., & Derakhshi, H. (2024). Recognizing the Sassanid era of Varamin, archaeological evidence. Journal of Archaeological Studies, (8), 1–17.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.