logo
Volume 42, Issue 1 (Spring 2021)                   Athar 2021, 42(1): 18-39 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alavian Sadr M, Izadi M S, Shahabian P, Talebian M H. (2021). Integrated Conservation and Development Planning of Urban Spaces Based on Components of Historic Urban Landscape. Athar. 42(1), 18-39.
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-740-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Hamadan University, Hamadan, Iran , ms.izadi@basu.ac.ir
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, University of Tehran, Fine Arts Campus, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (2959 Views)
The recent approach defines conservation as "thoughtful management of change" and recommends a vision-based approach to cultural heritage management. The UNESCO Recommendation (2011) provides a guidance on the international landscape-based approach to the historic urban landscape (HUL). This document is currently partially implemented by national and local governments. The current study aims to develop an evaluation framework to explain the differences and similarities between existing local policies and management practices and recommended by the historical urban landscape method, defined for four variables: attributes (what), values (why), Stakeholders (who) and strategies (how). The framework presented in this paper in the form of a methodological model based on the conservation and integrated development of the historic city reveals how cultural heritage is defined in the policy framework, both in terms of tangible and intangible heritage and in their combination. It is expected to explain the degree of deviation from various aspects, such as the level of implementation of the HUL approach and the like. This process was suggested in order to protect and control the developments of the historical urban landscape in the form of six measures, including conducting comprehensive surveys and mapping of urban resources, reaching consensus with stakeholders, assessing the vulnerability of urban resources, integrating urban heritage values, their vulnerability in the context of large-scale urban development, prioritizing conservation and development measures, and creating favorable cooperation within local management frameworks. This framework, using case study methods, can be tested on a larger scale as a monitoring tool to study changes at the program level for conservation management and urban development.
Full-Text [PDF 1744 kb]   (1873 Downloads)    

✅ The current study aims to develop an evaluation framework to explain the differences and similarities between existing local policies and management practices and recommended by the historical urban landscape method, defined for four variables: attributes (what), values (why), Stakeholders (who) and strategies (how).

 


Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: History of architecture and urban planning
Received: 2021/04/19 | Accepted: 2021/05/31 | Published: 2021/07/14

References
1. Bandarin, F., & Van Oers, R. (2012). The historic urban landscape: managing heritage in an urban century. John Wiley & Sons. [DOI:10.1002/9781119968115]
2. Bloemers, T. J. (2010). 1. The Cultural Landscape and Heritage Paradox. Protection and Development of the Dutch Archaeological-Historical Landscape and its European Dimension. In The Cultural Landscape and Heritage Paradox (pp. 3-16). Amsterdam University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9789048510962-002]
3. COUNCIL, O. E. (2000). European Landscape Convention. CETS, 176.
4. Eshrati, P. (2018). Historical Urban landscape and observance of cultural landscape in development plans. Deputy Minister of Architecture and Urban Planning. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development.
5. Fairclough, G., Harrison, R., & Jnr, J. H. Jameson, and John Schofield (editors) (2008) The heritage reader. London, New York: Routledge.
6. Cities, H., & Initiative, U. S. (2010). Historic Urban Environment Conservation Challenges and Priorities for Action. Experts Meeting (March 12-14, 2009). Los Angeles.
7. Guzmán-Torres, Z. (2009). Historic buildings and contemporary additions: the elements of a cohesive design relationship. Directed by: Dr. Linebaugh, D. School of Architecture Planning and Preservation. University of Maryland. College Park.
8. Ghadiri, B (2006). New structures in historical Context (first Edition). Tehran.Cultural Research Office.
9. Habibi, S., & Maliheh, M. (2007). Urban Restoration: Definitions, Theories, Experiences, Universal Charters and Resolutions, Methods (Third Edition). University of Tehran Press(UTP).
10. ICOMOS, U. (2011). The Valetta Principles for the Safeguarding and Management of Historic Cities, Towns and Urban Areas. Principles, as adopted by the 17th ICOMOS General Assembly.
11. Jokilehto, J. (1998). International trends in historic preservation: from ancient monuments to living cultures. APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology, 29(3/4), 17-19. [DOI:10.2307/1504606]
12. Jokilehto, J. (1999, 2008). A History of Architectural Conservation. translated by Mohammad Hassan Talebian and Khashayar Bahadori. Tehran: Rozaneh. [DOI:10.4324/9780080523118] [PMID]
13. Landorf, C. (2009). A framework for sustainable heritage management: A study of UK industrial heritage sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 15(6), 494-510. doi:10.1080/13527250903210795 [DOI:10.1080/13527250903210795]
14. Leopold, L. B. (1971). A procedure for evaluating environmental impact (Vol. 645). US Department of the Interior. Geological Survey Circular. [DOI:10.3133/cir645]
15. Mason, R. (2008). Be interested and beware: Joining economic valuation and heritage conservation. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14(4), 303-318. [DOI:10.1080/13527250802155810]
16. Mohammadpoor, A. (2010). Meta-method: Philosophical and practical foundations of the combined research method in social and behavioral sciences (Third Edition). Tehran: Sociologists Publications.
17. Motahari Rad, M. (2016). Perception and visual contact in historic urban landscapes. Haft Shar, 4(55-56), 53-62.
18. Pereira Roders, A. R. (2007). Re-architecture: lifespan rehabilitation of built heritage. Book I Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
19. Thompson, M. A. (1990). Determining impact significance in EIA: a review of 24 methodologies. Journal of environmental management, 30(3), 235-250. [DOI:10.1016/0301-4797(90)90004-G]
20. UNESCO. (2009). 181 EX/29 preliminary study on the technical and legal aspects relating to the desirability of a standard-setting instrument on the conservation of the historic urban landscape. Paris. Available at. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001811/181132e.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2013).
21. UNESCO. (2011). 36 C/23 Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape, Paris. Available at. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002110/211094e.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2013)
22. Van Oers, R. (2010). Managing cities and the historic urban landscape initiative-an introduction. Managing historic cities, 7-17. (Paris, France:UNESCO World Heritage Centre) available at http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-47-1.pdf (accessed 13 March 2013).
23. Veldpaus, L., Pereira Roders, A. R., & Colenbrander, B. J. (2013). Urban heritage: putting the past into the future. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 4(1), 3-18. [DOI:10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000022]
24. The web page of UNESCO. Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. available at. http://whc.unesco.org/en/activities/638

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.