Danesh
Hefazat va Maremat
Volume 9, Issue 1 (6-2026)
KCR 2026, 9(1): 1-15 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Altaha Bonab S, GHAREHBAGLOU M, MIJANI M. Application of the Metaverse in relation to cultural heritage requirements based on international documents and conventions. KCR 2026; 9 (1) :1-15
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-242-en.html
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-242-en.html
Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran
Abstract: (684 Views)
Historic urban fabrics and architectural heritage are subject to a wide range of international charters and conventions that establish guiding principles for conservation, restoration, documentation, reconstruction, and cultural tourism. Foundational documents such as the Venice Charter, the Nara Document on Authenticity, UNESCO conventions, and the Burra Charter emphasize concepts including authenticity, integrity, accurate documentation, and the responsible use of heritage resources. In practice, however, the implementation of these principles has become increasingly complex due to factors such as physical deterioration, natural hazards, restricted accessibility, and the growing pressures of mass tourism.
In recent years, advances in immersive digital technologies have introduced alternative approaches to addressing these challenges. Among them, the Metaverse understood as a three-dimensional digital environment integrating Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) has gained attention as a platform for experiencing, documenting, and interpreting cultural heritage. Unlike conventional visualization or presentation tools, Metaverse-based environments allow users to engage with heritage spaces interactively and remotely, often through digital avatars, thereby expanding possibilities for access and interpretation beyond physical constraints.
Although immersive technologies have been increasingly employed in heritage-related projects, their relationship with the normative frameworks defined by international heritage documents has not been sufficiently examined. Existing studies tend to focus on technical capabilities or user experience, while questions of compatibility with established conservation principles remain underexplored. This study seeks to address this gap by examining how Metaverse-related capabilities correspond to the requirements articulated in international charters and conventions concerning historic environments.
In recent years, advances in immersive digital technologies have introduced alternative approaches to addressing these challenges. Among them, the Metaverse understood as a three-dimensional digital environment integrating Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) has gained attention as a platform for experiencing, documenting, and interpreting cultural heritage. Unlike conventional visualization or presentation tools, Metaverse-based environments allow users to engage with heritage spaces interactively and remotely, often through digital avatars, thereby expanding possibilities for access and interpretation beyond physical constraints.
Although immersive technologies have been increasingly employed in heritage-related projects, their relationship with the normative frameworks defined by international heritage documents has not been sufficiently examined. Existing studies tend to focus on technical capabilities or user experience, while questions of compatibility with established conservation principles remain underexplored. This study seeks to address this gap by examining how Metaverse-related capabilities correspond to the requirements articulated in international charters and conventions concerning historic environments.
Keywords: Metaverse, historical context, Metaverse capabilities, application of metaverse in historical context, charters and statements
Type of Study: Research, Original, Regular |
Subject:
Application of modern sciences, technologies, equipment, materials and methods
Received: 2025/05/5 | Accepted: 2026/06/9 | Published: 2026/06/9
Received: 2025/05/5 | Accepted: 2026/06/9 | Published: 2026/06/9
References
1. (2012)Vienna Note on "World Heritage and Contemporary Architecture-Historic Urban Landscape Management". Manzar, Manzar Scientific Journal, (18) 4, 23-20 (In Persian).
2. Al-Tabeeb A K, Al-Desouqi A A. (2023). Metaverse in Architecture: An Approach to Documenting and Exploring the Egyptian Heritage Through Metaverse. Green Building & Construction Economics. 276-295. https://doi.org/10.37256/gbce.4220232300
3. Allam Z, Sharifi A, Bibri S E, Jones D S, Krogstie J. (2022). The metaverse as a virtual form of smart cities: Opportunities and challenges for environmental, economic, and social sustainability in urban futures. Smart Cities, 5(3), 771-801.http://mdpi.com/26246511/5/3/40
4. Baker J, Nam K, Dutt C S. (2023). A user experience perspective on heritage tourism in the metaverse: Empirical evidence and design dilemmas for VR. Information Technology & Tourism, 25(3), 265-306. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/S40558-023-00256-X
5. Bamanian M R, Ansari M Almasifar N. (2010). Revitalizing the “Cultural Landscape” of Takht-e-Soleman with Emphasis on the Approaches to Recreating and Protecting ICOMOS World Heritage (Florence Charter, P. H. Childhead, Canadian Parks Agency Policy, United States National Park Service). Urban Management, 8(26), 7-26. https://sid.ir/paper/92179/fa (In Persian)
6. Basiri S, Vatandoost R, Emami S M A, Ahmadi H.(2015). Explanation the concept of Integrity in the field of museum works, in terms of determining the affecting factors on it.4(8):111-131http://mmi.aui.ac.ir/article-1-126-fa.html (In Persian)
7. Buhalis D, Karatay N. 2022. Mixed reality (MR) for generation Z in cultural heritage tourism towards metaverse. In ENTER22 e-Tourism Conference (pp. 16-27). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
8. Campi M, Di Luggo A, Scandurra S. (2017). 3D modeling for the knowledge of architectural heritage and virtual reconstruction of its historical memory. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 133-139. https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLII-2-W3/133/2017/
9. Canciani M, Conigliaro E, Del Grasso M, Papalini P, Saccone M. (2016). 3D survey and augmented reality for cultural heritage. The case study of Aurelian wall at Castra Praetoria in Rome. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 931-937. https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLI-B5/931/2016/
10. Chehab A, Nakhal B. (2023). EXPLORING VIRTUAL REALITY AS AN APPROACH TO RESURRECT DESTROYED HISTORICAL BUILDINGS - AN APPROACH TO REVIVE THE DESTROYED “EGG BUILDING” THROUGH VR," Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ): Vol. 28: Iss. 3, Article 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8547.1212
11. Cheraghchi S.(2004). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Athar Scientific Quarterly. 25 (36 and 37):245-258. http://journal.richt.ir/athar/article-1-291-fa.html (In Persian)
12. Comes R, Neamțu C, Buna Z L, Bodi Ș, Popescu D, Tompa V, Mateescu-Suciu L. (2020). Enhancing accessibility to cultural heritage through digital content and virtual reality: A case study of the Sarmizegetusa Regia UNESCO site. Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology, 7(3). https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=911818
13. Condorelli F, Rinaudo F. (2018). Cultural heritage reconstruction from historical photographs and videos. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 259-265. http://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLII-2/259/2018/isprs-archives-XLII-2-259-2018.html
14. Corrales M, Rodríguez F, Merchán M J, Merchán P, Pérez E. (2024). Comparative Analysis between Virtual Visits and Pedagogical Outings to Heritage Sites: An Application in the Teaching of History. Heritage, 7(1), 366-379. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/7/1/18
15. Dayoub B, Yang P, Omran S, Zhang Q, Dayoub A. (2024). Digital Silk Roads: Leveraging the Metaverse for Cultural Tourism within the Belt and Road Initiative Framework. Electronics, 13(12), 2306. http://mdpi.com/2079-9292/13/12/2306
16. Dewi E P, Budilaksono S, Suwartane I G A, Nurina N, Trikariastoto, T, Nurjaman H N, Wijaya A. (2024, March). Metaverse of Heritage Buildings in Jakarta’s Old Town as a Media for Preservation and Historical Education Tourism. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research for Sustainable Innovation (Vol.1,No.1,pp.549-559). https://proceeding.researchsynergypress.com/index.php/icmrsi/article/view/845
17. Dzwierzynska J, Prokop A. (2022). Reconstruction of Historic Monuments—A Dual Approach. Sustainability, 14(21), 14651. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14651
18. Fadainejad S, Hanachi P. (2014). Study and explanation of the evolution of policies and programs for the protection of cultural heritage, period from 1978 to 2012. Iranian Architectural Studies, 3(5), 21-37. https://sid.ir/paper/503512/fa (In Persian)
19. Fan Z, Chen C, Huang H. (2022). Immersive cultural heritage digital documentation and information service for historical figure metaverse: a case of Zhu Xi, Song Dynasty, China. Heritage Science, 10(1), 148. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40494-022-00749-8
20. Fanani A Z, Hastuti K, Syarif A M, Harsanto P W. (2021). Challenges in developing virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed-reality applications: Case Studies on a 3D-based tangible cultural heritage conservation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(11). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Challenges-in-Developing-Virtual-Reality%2C-Augmented-Fanani-Hastuti/b58d70fba0ec86ec834ec24acec79eecef2ef92f?p2df
21. Fanani A Z, Syarif A M (2023). Historical Building 3D Reconstruction for a Virtual Reality-based Documentation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(9). https://www.proquest.com/openview/2b773d51151376af6bdc742348868e72/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=5444811
22. Gaafar A A. (2021). Metaverse in architectural heritage documentation & education. Advances in Ecological and Environmental Research, 6(10),66-86 .https://www.ss-pub.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/AEER2021101401.pdf
23. Haddad N A, Fakhoury L A, Sakr Y M (2021). A critical anthology of international charters, conventions & principles on documentation of cultural heritage for conservation, monitoring & management. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 21(1),291-291. https://www.maajournal.com/index.php/maa/article/view/504
24. Han J, Vande Moere A, Simeone A L. (2024, May). Meaning Follows Purpose: Unravelling the Architectural Design Conventions in the Contemporary Metaverse. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-22). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3613904.3642519
25. Hanachi P, Fadaei Nezhad S. (2011). A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Conservation and Regeneration in Historic Urban Areas. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 3(46), 15-26 (In Persian)
26. Hatefi Shogae S, Zarei M E. (2017). Documenting and Evaluating the Restoration of Historic Gardens of Hamadan on the Basis of Florence Charter (Case Study: Nazari Garden and Home Gardens of Americans). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 14(46), 31-40 (In Persian) https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_44357.html]
27. Hemmati M. (2022). The Metaverse: An Urban Revolution Effect of the Metaverse on the Perceptions of Urban Audience. Tourism of Culture, 2(7), 49-56. doi:10.22034/toc.2022.323276.1067 (In Persian) https://www.toc-sj.com/article_143468.html]
28. International Charters for the Protection and Restoration of Historic Buildings and Sites (1931-2003) (Translated under the supervision of Ayatollah Shirazi). ICOMOS Cultural Institute of Iran(In Persian)
29. Jun G. (2020). Virtual reality church as a new mission frontier in the metaverse: Exploring theological controversies and missional potential of virtual reality church. Transformation, 37(4), 297-305. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265378820963155
30. Kari G, Karimi Azeri A R, Ettehad S. (2015). Designing Principles in Historical Buildings of Iran. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 3(4 (s)), pp-378. https://european-science.com/eojnss_proc/article/view/4178
31. Kashiripoor М М. (2023). Metaverse city: definition and direction development for urban planning and architecture. Вестник Брестского государственного технического университета, (3 (132)), 2-10. https://journal.bstu.by/index.php/bstu_herald/article/view/864
32. Kersten T P, Büyüksalih G, Tschirschwitz F, Kan T, Deggim S, Kaya Y, Baskaraca A P. (2017). The Selimiye Mosque of Edirne, Turkey–an immersive and interactive virtual reality experience using HTC Vive. The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 42, 403-409. https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLII-5-W1/403/2017/
33. Mahardika M S, Junaidy D W, Gary A A P, Mauludi E, Husni D S, Agirachman F A, Wibisono A. (2023). Preserving History in The Metaverse: A Platform to Digitize the Campus Cultural Heritage in Indonesia.
34. Mahmoudi Ghozhdi M R, Talebian M H, Vatan Doost R. (1401). Explaining the shaping components of the Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972) in the context of time. Iranian Architectural Studies, 11(22), 215-236. https://sid.ir/paper/1053095/fa (In Persian) https://sid.ir/paper/1053095/fa]
35. Merchán M J, Merchán P, Pérez E. (2021). Good practices in the use of augmented reality for the dissemination of architectural heritage of rural areas. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2055. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/5/2055
36. Mirashrafi A H. (1401). Scientific study and analysis of the metaverse world and its future prospects. New Approaches in Islamic Studies, (4)12,404-387. https://civilica.com/doc/1880162/ (In Persian)
37. Mohammadi H, Behboodi Sadabad M. (2021). Foresight Application in conservation planning for urban Historical Context - The Case of world heritage core zone Yazd city. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(2), 417-437. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.313532.1403(In Persian)
38. Münster S, Apollonio F I, Bluemel I, Fallavollita F, Foschi R, Grellert M, Schelbert G. (2024). Handbook of Digital 3D Reconstruction of Historical Architecture (p. 204). Springer Nature. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/90414
39. Pourmoghaddam A r. (2004). Nara Statement. Journal of Restoration and Cultural Heritage Knowledge. (In Persian)
40. Sajjadian M, Firouzi M A, Pourahmad A. (1400). Metaverse and “metaverse” and “crypto” cities; A study on conscious use in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Geography and Urban Planning Zagros Landscape, (49)13, 7-40. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/zagros/Article/937789 (In Persian)
41. Setiadi A H, Syah A A M. Utilizing Metaverse Technology for the Preservation of Indigenous Houses in Southeast Sulawesi: A Study of Bajo, Tolaki, Muna, and Buton Cultural Heritage. JACEE (Journal of Advanced Civil and Environmental Engineering), 7(1), 98-108. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/JACEE/article/view/37024
42. Shojaei S, Alemi B, Jeyhani H R. (1400). Protection of urban values of historical passages based on pathology of upper neighborhood passage in Naraq city. Economics and Urban Planning, 2(3), 134-146. doi: 10.22034/UE.2021.2.03.02 (In Persian)
43. Sim J K, Xu K W, Jin Y, Lee Z Y, Teo Y J, Mohan P, Cai Y. (2024). Designing an Educational Metaverse: A Case Study of NTUniverse. Applied Sciences, 14(6), 2559. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/6/2559
44. Sipahioglu N, KOC M K. THE VIRTUAL WAYS OF SETTLING DOWN: REINTERPRETING THE TRANSFORMATION OF SPACE IN METAVERSE. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nur-Sipahioglu-2/publication/377577342_THE_VIRTUAL_WAYS_OF_SETTLING_DOWN_REINTERPRETING_THE_TRANSFORMATION_OF_SPACE_IN_METAVERSE/links/65ae4fcf6c7ad06ab417ac3f/THE-VIRTUAL-WAYS-OF-SETTLING-DOWN-REINTERPRETING-THE-TRANSFORMATION-OF-SPACE-IN-METAVERSE.pdf
45. Slocombe M. (2015). La Sociedad para la Protección de Edificios Antiguos (SPAB). Loggia, Arquitectura & Restauración, (28), 46-51. https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/loggia/article/view/3995
46. Sohrabi-Moghaddam-Chafjiri I, Nejad-Demochali A. (1401). Investigating the role of artificial intelligence in the reconstruction of historical monuments in Iran. Journal of Islamic Culture and Art, 3(1), 106-92. https://www.jiac.ir/files/cd_papers/r_1_221229014612.pdf (In Persian)
47. Tang S K, Hou J H. (2022). Designing a framework for metaverse architecture. In Proceedings of the 27th CAADRIA Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 445-454). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/June-Hao Hou/publication/362171315_Designing_a_Framework_for_Metaverse_Architecture/links/63513f3e6e0d367d91aedc6c/Designing-a-Framework-for-Metaverse-Architecture.pdf
48. Torkzaban S, Mohammad Moradi A. (2012). Architectural Design Criteria In Historical Fabrics. Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 1(1), 53-66. (In Persian)
49. Treccarichi Scavuzzo S. (2022). Immersive experience of ancient architectural heritage and related historical events–Reconstruction and visualization of the fire incident at the tomb of first Dynasty Egyptian Queen Meret-Neith in Abydos (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Wien). https://repositum.tuwien.at/handle/20.500.12708/136286
50. Zhang X, Yang D, Yow C H, Huang L, Wu X, Huang X, Cai Y. (2022). Metaverse for cultural heritages. Electronics, 11(22), 3730. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/22/3730
51. Zhang X, Zhi Y, Xu J, Han L. (2022). Digital protection and utilization of architectural heritage using knowledge visualization. Buildings, 12(10), 1604. https://www.mdpi.com/2075 5309/12/10/1604
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |