logo
Volume 41, Issue 3 (Fall 2020)                   Athar 2020, 41(3): 306-324 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gholinejad Pirbazari A, Kiani K. (2020). Spatial Syntax Analysis of Gardens Registered in the World Heritage List - Case Studies: Iran, China and France. Athar. 41(3), 306-324.
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-659-en.html
1- Faculty member of Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute , gholinejadali@gmail.com
2- M.Sc., Landscape Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (3355 Views)

Although different human civilizations have different characteristics that are influenced by geography, cultural, social, climatic and identity differences, but since they belong to the global community, they have points both in terms of commonalities and differences. According to our definition of cultural heritage, one of the types of places are gardens. Gardens are a human experience that encompass the relationship between life, nature and the world of spirits. This study seeks to compare the two Iranian gardens recorded as world heritage with two gardens of the same period from China and France. In fact, the purpose of this study is to compare examples of three gardening styles with each other in order to identify the differences among gardens of these styles. The selected gardens each have very different design structures, which by analytical method and using space syntax software (Depth map) Finn, Eram, Versailles and Yu, gardens were investigated and compared in terms of  components such as connectivity, visual integrity, entropy and spatial depth. Studying the structures of these gardens, their similarities and differences were achieved.

Full-Text [PDF 2215 kb]   (2132 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: History of architecture and urban planning
Received: 2021/02/20 | Accepted: 2021/04/6 | Published: 2021/06/10

References
1. Abbasalizadeh Rezakolai, S., Samadi, D., & Tabatabaian, M. (2015). Analysis of Persian Gardens using Kaplan's landscape preference theory (Case study: Fin garden, Shazdeh Mahan garden, Eram Garden & El Goli garden). Iran University of Science & Technology, 25(1), 6-20.
2. Alai, A. (2009). Diversity of Design in Historical Gardens of Shiraz. Soffeh, 19(2-1). https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100123_133ad69db31c92e02e8c9e88807be54a.pdf
3. Alireza, A. (2015). A general Survey of persian gardens and an investigation of the. Historical gardens of Shiraz. [Persian].
4. Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 6(1), 47-65. [DOI:10.1068/b060047]
5. Chang, H. Y. (2006). The Spatial Structure Form of Traditional Chinese Garden-A Case Study on The Lin Family Garden. Master, National Chenggong University, Taiwan.
6. Farahani, L. M., Motamed, B., & Jamei, E. (2016). Persian gardens: Meanings, symbolism, and design. Landscape online, 46, 1-19. [DOI:10.3097/LO.201646]
7. Hillier, B. (1999). The hidden geometry of deformed grids: or, why space syntax works, when it looks as though it shouldn't. Environment and Planning B: planning and Design, 26(2), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260169 [DOI:10.1068/b4125]
8. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The social logic of space. Cambridge university press.
9. Hunt, J. D. (2014). A world of gardens. Reaktion Books.
10. Heidari, A., and Ghasemian Asl, A., and Kiai, M. (2017). Analysis of spatial structure of traditional Iranian houses using spatial syntax method Case study: Comparison of Yazd, Kashan and Isfahan houses. Islamic Iranian City Studies, 7 (28), 21-33.
11. Impelluso, L. (2007). Jardins, potagers et labyrinthes. Hazan.
12. Keswick, M., Jencks, C., & Hardie, A. (1978). The Chinese Garden: History. Art and Architecture (Academy Editions, London).
13. Khosravi, H. (2014). Geopolitics of tabula rasa: Persian garden and the idea of city. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 38(1), 39-53. [DOI:10.3846/20297955.2014.897017]
14. Li, Z. (2011). Visual perception of traditional garden space in Suzhou, China: A case study with space syntax techniques. 2011 19th International Conference on Geoinformatics, [DOI:10.1109/GeoInformatics.2011.5980789]
15. Li, Z., Cheng, Y., & Xiao, R. (2018). Electroencephalogram experiment based analysis of aesthetic fatigue on Chinese traditional garden. NeuroQuantology, 16(5). [DOI:10.14704/nq.2018.16.5.1296]
16. Lu, S. (2009). From Syntax to Plot: the spatial language of a Chinese garden. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium,
17. Lu, S. (2010). Hidden orders in Chinese gardens: irregular fractal structure and its generative rules. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 37(6), 1076-1094. [DOI:10.1068/b36042]
18. Madahi, S. M., & Memarian, G. H. (2017). A Space Syntax Analysis of Vernacular Dwelling Configuration (Case Study: Boshrooyeh City). Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 35(156), 49-66.. http://jhre.ir/article-1-846-en.html
19. Magni, A. (2018). Principles of the French Garden in the Czech Garden Design. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(5), 1171-1181. [DOI:10.11118/actaun201866051171]
20. Mahdavinejad, M., Rostam, N. G., & Mahdavi, S. (2013). The Role of the Gestalt Theory in Understanding Persian Architectural Masterpieces, Case Study: Fin-Garden of Kashan. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 2(1), 1.
21. Mansouri, S. (2013, June). Recognize of the Form and Spatial Structure of Safavid Historic Gardens. Case Study: Bagh-i Shah of Ashraf al-Belad City (Behshahr's old name), North of Iran. International Conference on Architecture and Urban Design.
22. Minford, J. (1998). The Chinese garden: death of a symbol. Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes, 18(3), 257-268. [DOI:10.1080/14601176.1998.10435550]
23. Moghtader, M. R., & Yavari, M. (1998). The Persian Garden: echoes of paradise. Mage Publishers.
24. Montello, D. R. (2007, June). The contribution of space syntax to a comprehensive theory of environmental psychology. In Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, _Istanbul, iv-1-12. Retrieved from http://www. spacesyntaxistanbul. itu. edu. tr/papers/invitedpapers/daniel_montello. pdf.
25. Mosser, M., & Teyssot, G. (Eds.). (1991). Histoire des jardins: de la Renaissance à nos jours (p. 426). Flammarion.
26. Motedayen, H., & Motedayen, R. (2015). The Need to Create a Persian Garden. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 3(7), 19-26.. http://www.jaco-sj.com/article_13280_8a8dcc6af8e8f06f4cbd0ca992b8b473.pdf
27. Nourtaghani, A. (2017). The relationship between system of activities and configuration Kuhdasht houses with space syntax approach. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 22(1), 65-74. [DOI:10.22059/jfaup.2017.62266]
28. Peng, Y. (1986). Analysis of classical Chinese gardens. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
29. Pour, H. N., Rad, M. M.,.& Pishe, S. M. (2012). Persian gardens are sustainable gardens: Scrutinize the sustainability features in Persian gardens. Archi-Cultural Translations through the Silk Road 2nd International Conference,
30. Prévôt, P. (2006). Histoire des jardins. Sud Ouest.
31. Rosley, M. S. F., Rahman, S. R. A., & Lamit, H. (2014). Biophilia Theory Revisited: Experts and non-experts perception on aesthetic quality of ecological landscape. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 349-362. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.068]
32. Sagers, L. (2002). The French Garden. UtahState University. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2445&context=extension_histall
33. Seyed Rasoul, M., Haji Abed, Taghavi, Soraya, Sharifinejad. (2015). Comparative Studies on Spatial Structure of Persian Gardens in Safavid and Mughal Periods. Journal of Subcontinent Researches, 6(21), 151-167. [DOI:10.22111/jsr.2015.1959]
34. Sui, Y., Xun, W., & Liu, S. (2010). Chinese Gardens. Design Media Pub.
35. Tong, J. (1997). Glimpses of gardens in Eastern China. Architecture and Building Press, Beijing, China.
36. Van Zanten, B. T., Zasada, I., Koetse, M. J., Ungaro, F., Häfner, K., & Verburg, P. H. (2016). A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 17, 87-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.011]
37. Wang, S., & Wang, B. (2013). Configurational diagram of Chinese traditional architecture: path network analysis in space syntax. The Architect, 162(4), 84-90.
38. Wikipedia (n.d.). Access Data, 21 Febuary 2021. https://en.wikipedia.org/
39. Wilber, D. N. (1994). Persian gardens & garden pavilions. Tuttle Publishing.
40. Wineman, J., Peponis, J., & Dalton, R. (2006). Exploring, engaging, understanding in museums.
41. YARI, F., & Hoorshenas, R. A. Z. I. E. H. (2017). Iranian Architecture and Symbolism in Iranian Gardens, Case Study: Eram Garden. Building Engineering & Housing Science, 11(21), 49-55. http://behs.bhrc.ac.ir/article_69693_4ac166bea8c9f048ea9adc3881a1bbf1.pdf
42. Yu, R., Behbahani, P. A., Ostwald, M., & Gu, N. (2015). Wayfinding in traditional Chinese private gardens: a spatial analysis of the Yuyuan garden.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.