logo
Volume 45, Issue 107 (2-2025)                   Athar 2025, 45(107): 5-40 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fadaei H, Kamali A, Karami H. (2025). Resilience of the Parse-Pasargadae World Heritage Sites Against Environmental Crises Using Achaemenid Creativity and Traditional Knowledge. Athar. 45(107), 5-40. doi:10.22034/45.107.1
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-1711-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Research Center for the Conservation and Restoration of Cultural and Historical Objects, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran , hfadaii@yahoo.com
2- Assistant Professor, Research Center for the Conservation and Restoration of Cultural and Historical Objects, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran
3- PhD in Archaeology, Pasargadae World Heritage Site, Shiraz, Iran.
Abstract:   (968 Views)
Abstract
Drought and excessive water extraction resulting from the agricultural policies of past decades in the plains of Marvdasht and Pasargadae have led to cracks, sinkholes, and a spongy soil texture, ultimately causing a general subsidence of the plains' surface. These phenomena pose a significant threat to the historic region and valuable world heritage sites. Today, revisiting the creativity employed to manage or overcome the destructive impacts of the natural environment can serve as a model for overcoming regional crises. The main objective of this research is to understand the creativity and traditional knowledge during the Achaemenid period in order to overcome environmental crises. The essential question is: what role did the traditional engineering and knowledge of this period play in managing crises such as floods and earthquakes? In general, ensuring sustainable water resources in the Parse-Pasargadae region, as a crucial part of the Achaemenid Empire, was of great importance. The development of agriculture in these areas was dependent on the enhancement of irrigation systems to supply water for cultivated lands. Thus, Achaemenid designers and engineers, to manage droughts a constant crisis in the semi-arid regions of Iran and to overcome seasonal flash floods, designed and implemented an extensive system of water control, storage, and transfer across the plains of Pasargadae and Marvdasht. Understanding these integrated water systems today can reveal the roots of heritage resilience over time, offering valuable lessons. Additionally, considering the region's seismic activity, employing appropriate engineering in the selection, transport, and implementation of materials including the use of large stone blocks in architecture, multi-layered stone foundations and floors, and enhancing the load-bearing capacity of building bases was among the creative methods used to increase the stability of structures. This study was conducted based on field investigations and the review of relevant historical documents and records. Through necessary analyses, efforts were made to elucidate the role of engineering in the Achaemenid period in overcoming environmental challenges. The results of the research indicate that understanding and reapplying past technical knowledge can not only restore and sustain human coexistence with the natural environment and its hazards but also provide suitable solutions for protecting the content of heritage resources, ensuring their authenticity.
Keywords: Traditional Knowledge, Creativity, Resilience, Crisis Management, Parse-Pasargadae World Heritage Sites.

Introduction
With the establishment of the largest empire of the ancient world during the Achaemenid period, two major capitals, Pasargadae and Persepolis, were founded in Fars by Cyrus the Great and later by Darius (Shobairi, 2017: 58). The fertile lands, abundant water resources, and the temperate, favorable climate of the Pasargadae plain were among the natural blessings that led to the selection of this location and the foundation of some of the most significant monuments of the Achaemenid civilization. The Polvar River also provided a natural route between Pasargadae and Persepolis. The abundant water of the Polvar River indicated the existence of numerous gardens and settlements in the region (Sami, 1996: 10). The site of Persepolis was constructed at the western end of the sacred Mount Mehr (or Rahmat) and overlooks the Marv Dasht plain (ancient Parse), which shows evidence of settlement as early as the fifth millennium BCE (Karami, 2017: 16; Zeidi, 2017: 34). According to historical documents, the ancient plain of Parse was fertile and enjoyed a pleasant climate. Furthermore, it was rich in forests, orchards, abundant water, and pastures for horses. The Persepolis clay tablets also confirm these characteristics (Sumner, 1968: 18). Remnants of irrigation systems have been observed in the surrounding areas of Persepolis as well (Afkhkami & Khosravi, 2018: 28).
Unfortunately, repeated droughts and excessive groundwater extraction in the Parse–Pasargadae region have led to land subsidence and the formation of deep fissures around sites such as Persepolis and Naqsh-e Rostam, posing serious threats to these invaluable historical complexes (Raeisi-Ardekani, 2010). The main cause of land subsidence in sedimentary basins of arid and semi-arid regions is the overexploitation of groundwater resources (Pacheco et al., 2006). In addition to this, occasional flash floods caused by climate change threaten the very foundations of many cultural heritage sites. The Achaemenid innovations in overcoming environmental adversities are crucial topics that, if properly understood today, can guide not only the physical conservation of these unique heritages but also offer important lessons for living in harmony with nature and enhancing resilience to modern environmental challenges. Therefore, a principal aim of the present study is to revisit the ancient innovations employed during the Achaemenid period in the Parse–Pasargadae region to control or overcome major regional crises such as floods and earthquakes. By studying previous research, historical sources, and conducting field surveys and documentation, this research introduces, analyzes, and evaluates some aspects of traditional Achaemenid engineering in the geographical context of Parse–Pasargadae as a model for sustainable heritage conservation.

Discussion
The most important surface water resources of the region are the Kor and Sivand (Polvar) Rivers, which irrigate many plains along their course (Fig. 1). Thus, agriculture—the fundamental basis of the economy of ancient civilizations—developed in fertile plains such as Parse and Pasargadae. However, agriculture during the Achaemenid period would have been highly challenging and economically unjustifiable without systematic irrigation (Shobairi, 2017: 62). Consequently, Achaemenid designers and engineers developed and implemented an extensive system of water control, storage, and transfer across the Pasargadae plain and its surroundings. The construction of this system, including a series of dams, barriers, and a wide network of water canals, faced numerous complexities and difficulties, yet was executed successfully through wise planning and management. This approach fostered resilience in settlement and agricultural activities against environmental hazards. Part of the architectural science and structural engineering in Iranian architecture, including during the Achaemenid period, focused on resilience against the constant threat of earthquakes. Therefore, during the Achaemenid era, it was essential to devise and apply measures to mitigate earthquake impacts. The use of durable materials along with architectural techniques was among the strategies employed by Achaemenid architects to withstand natural adversities like earthquakes and to ensure the resilience and longevity of architectural monuments.
The craftsmanship and precision of the stonecutters in joining stone blocks were so refined that the joints were sometimes imperceptible, creating an integrated appearance between structural and decorative elements. The use of clamps between stone blocks not only prevented additional movements but also enhanced the structural integrity, thereby improving resistance against tensile forces and unforeseen shear stresses (Wright, 2005: 254). In the foundation construction of Achaemenid buildings, the load-bearing capacity of the soil was reinforced to prevent settlement, rupture, and creep within the affected zones. The use of massive and monolithic stone blocks in Achaemenid palaces, despite the challenges in transportation and assembly, significantly contributed to the unified behavior of structures during seismic events. Early examples of seismic isolation systems and effective connections between load-bearing elements to increase the stiffness of the platforms upon which palaces were built were among the methods employed during the Achaemenid period to cope with climatic adversities (Motamedmanesh, 2018: 24). Additionally, the insertion of lead sheets between stone blocks not only assisted in leveling large stone units but also played a role in reducing the slippage of stones over each other.

Conclusion
The Achaemenids' understanding of resource arrangement strategies in the Parse–Pasargadae region, combined with sound decision-making and coherent, environmentally adaptive actions, led to the creation of essential infrastructure for water resource management and mitigation of environmental crises caused by floods in the plains. Particularly in Pasargadae, the control of upstream water resources, their utilization for agricultural development, and the design and creation of the royal garden, along with the organization of garden irrigation through uniquely designed water features, all reflect precise engineering and intelligent exploitation of environmental and climatic capacities. The management behind the creation of these achievements, whose evidence endures to this day, stands as an exceptional testament to the Achaemenid art and engineering of resilience against environmental adversities, especially seasonal floods that once threatened the foundations of life and economy in the region’s fertile plains.
Seismic activity in the Parse–Pasargadae region posed another significant threat to architectural structures, particularly to the monumental buildings of Pasargadae and Persepolis. One aspect of the Achaemenid engineering response to this threat was the use of large stone blocks in construction, aimed at preventing settlement and structural failure through precise calculations and reinforcement of the load-bearing capacity of building foundations. At the same time, the coherence and flexibility of structures demonstrate a construction system well adapted to climatic conditions, with special attention given to enhancing the bearing capacity of the ground. Indeed, the durability of many of these monuments owes much to the careful consideration of climate, innovative material selection, transportation methods, and construction techniques.
The creation and enduring survival of the grand Achaemenid monuments to this day are the result of their traditional knowledge and creativity in adapting to and coexisting with nature, understanding its laws, and wisely utilizing its capacities to overcome environmental adversities. Awareness of traditional knowledge regarding the management of environmental crises offers valuable models for how humans can interact sustainably with the natural world. This reciprocal relationship between the past and the present not only strengthens cultural identity but also contributes to enhancing the resilience of cultural heritage sites in the face of contemporary environmental challenges.
Full-Text [PDF 1884 kb]   (335 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Researches related to cultural heritage
Received: 2024/06/21 | Accepted: 2024/09/6 | Published: 2025/02/28

References
1. - استروناخ، دیوید. (1379). پاسارگاد گزارشی از کاوش‌های انجام شده توسط موسسه مطالعات ایرانی بریتانیا. ترجمه حمید خطیب شهیدی. انتشارات سازمان میراث فرهنگی کشور.
2. - اسدی، احمدعلی، و منصوری، مجید. (1402). «کاوش آب‌راه آجری حیاط 17 خزانه تخت‌جمشید». در: کارنامگ پارسه، گردآوری و تدوین: حمید فدایی، سهیل دلشاد، مهرناز بردبار و محمد جواد اولادحسین. انتشارات پرثوا. 29-1.
3. - افخمی، بهروز، و خسروی، زینب. (1397). «معنا و کارکرد باغ ایرانی (با تأکید بر دوره هخامنشی)». پژوهش‌های ایرانشناسی، 8(2): 21-37. DOI: 10.22059/jis.2019.71431
4. - اکبری، امیر؛ و فتاحی معصوم، آمنه سادات. (1395). «بررسی میزان تاثیرگذاری معماری اورارتو بر معماری هخامنشی، نمونه موردی کاخ آپادانا شوش». پژوهشنامه تاریخ، 11 (44): 48-15. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/history/Article/942824/FullText
5. - امان‌اللهی، حمید. (1389). «بررسی‌های اخیر معادن سنگ هخامنشی حوزه مرودشت». باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، 48: 48-37.
6. - امیرشاه کرمی، سیدعبدالعظیم. (1385). «بازخوانی مهندسی پل خواجو». گلستان هنر، 2(6): 81-94.
7. - امیرشاه‌کرمی، عبدالعظیم. (1383). «گزارش زمین‌شناسی و تکتونیک و تحلیل عددی دیوار تخت جمشید». آرشیو و مرکز اسناد پایگاه پارسه ـ پاسارگاد.
8. - انصاری لاری، احمد؛ و انصاری، مریم. (1395). «برآورد میزان فرسایش خاک در دشت مرودشت (استان فارس) با استفاده از مدل تجربی RUSLE». پژوهش های ژئومورفولوژی کمی، 4(4 ): 134-149. DOR: 20.1001.1.22519424.1395.4.4.9.2
9. - پریسای، علی. (1392). «تحلیل مهندسی کاخ آپادانا تخت‌جمشید با استفاده از روش‌های عددی ( اجزاء محدود)». پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته عمران با گرایش سازه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات فارس، راهنما: دکترسید عبدالعظیم امیر شاه کرمی، استاد مشاور: دکترسید امیرالدین صدرنژاد.
10. - حکمت‌زاده، علی‌اکبر؛ محبوبی نیازمندی، میثم؛ و بینش، سید محمد. (1396). بررسی لرزه‌ای سازه شرقی دروازه ملل به روش اجزاء گسسته. دانشگاه صنعتی شیراز، کتابخانه و مرکز اسناد پایگاه میراث جهانی تخت‌جمشید.
11. - خبرآنلاین. (1396آبان25). بناهای هخامنشی مقاوم در برابر زلزله. بازیابی شده از: https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/728037/
12. - دانجلیس، گوگلیلمو. (1366). «جانمایه معماری هخامنشی در قرن‌های ششم و پنجم ق.م». ترجمۀ اصغر کریمی. اثر، 22 و 23: 24-13.
13. - راست‌بود، اصغر؛ و وثوقی، بهزاد. (1389). «بررسی تغییر شکل بین لرزه ای در ناحیه برخورد صفحه‌های زمین‌ساختی عربستان و اوراسیا در منطقه خاورمیانه با استفاده از یک مدل تحلیلی». مجله ژئوفیزیک ایران، 4(2): 89-102. DOR: 20.1001.1.20080336.1389.4.2.6.1
14. - رُف، مایکل. (1381). نقش برجسته‌ها و حجاران تخت‌جمشید. برگردان: هوشنگ غیاثی نژاد. انتشارات گنجینه هنر.
15. - رئیسی‌اردکانی، عزت اله. (1389). طرح بررسی حریم هیدروژئولوژیکی محوطه میراث جهانی تخت‌جمشید. گزارش نهایی بخش علوم زمین دانشگاه شیراز. مرکز اسناد پایگاه میراث جهانی تخت‌جمشید.
16. - زارعی‌کردشولی، فرهاد؛ و کرمی، حمیدرضا، (1395). بررسی باستانشناسی شهرستان پاسارگاد. آرشیو پایگاه میراث جهانی پاسارگاد، منتشر نشده.
17. - زیدی، محسن‌. (1396). «محوطه‌های نویافته از هزارهپنجم پیش از میلاد در دره بلاغی و دشت پاسارگاد». در: پاسارگاد 2، مجموعه مقاله‌های حفاظت و مرمت، باستان‌شناسی، معماری، زمین‌شناسی، مردم‌شناسی و گردشگری. تهیه و تدوین: محمد حسن طالبیان، حمید فدایی. انتشارات کتاب بهار: 40-30.
18. - سامی، علی، (1375). پاسارگاد پایتخت و آرامگاه کوروش هخامنشی. به کوشش و بازنگری دکتر غلامرضا وطن‌دوست. انتشارات بنیاد فارس شناسی.
19. - سامی، علی، (1338). گزارش‌های باستان‌شناختی. جلد چهارم، انتشارات برنا، شیراز.
20. - سعیدی، زهرا. (1384). گزارش زمین‌شناسی مجموعه میراث جهانی پاسارگاد. مرکز اسناد پایگاه میراث جهانی پاسارگاد.
21. - سهیل، مهرآذر، (1399). مفهوم یادمان در معماری هخامنشی. ترجمه دکتر محمدحسن طالبیان. تهران، نشر سفیران.
22. - شاپورشهبازی، علیرضا، (1379). راهنمای جامع پاسارگاد. بنیاد فارس شناسی، چاپ اول.
23. - شــاپورشــهبازی، علیرضا، (1384). راهنمای مســتند تخت‌جمشید. بنیاد پژوهشی پارسه-پاسارگاد.
24. - شاهچراغی، آزاده، (1389). پارادایم‌های پردیس، درآمدی بر بازشناسی و بازآفرینی باغ ایرانی. تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی.
25. - شبیری، اباذر، (1396). «درآمدی بر آبیاری و کشاورزی در پارس باستان: دشت‌های پارسه ـ پاسارگاد در دوره هخامنشی». در: پاسارگاد 2، مجموعه مقاله‌های حفاظت و مرمت، باستان‌شناسی، معماری، زمین‌شناسی، مردم‌شناسی و گردشگری. تهیه و تدوین: محمد حسن طالبیان و حمید فدایی. انتشارات کتاب بهار: 77-58.
26. - کرمی، محمد، (1396). «پاسارگاد در هزاره پنجم پیش از میلاد». در: پاسارگاد 1، مجموعه مقاله‌های حفاظت و مرمت، باستان‌شناسی، معماری، زمین‌شناسی، مردم‌شناسی و گردشگری، به کوشش: محمد حسن طالبیان و حمید فدایی. انتشارات کتاب بهار: 18-5.
27. - کرمی، حمیدرضا، (1401). گزارش دو فصل کاوش باستان شناسی سد هخامنشی دیدگان. آرشیو پایگاه میراث جهانی پاسارگاد.
28. - کرمی، حمیدرضا، (1402). «سازه‌های آبی و مدیریت آب دوران هخامنشی در حوضه آبریز رود پلوار». پایان نامه دکترا، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان.
29. - کرمی، حمیدرضا؛ و طالبیان، محمدحسن، (1392). «مدیریت آب منطقه پاسارگاد در دوره هخامنشی». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی مدرس، 5 (11-10)، 242-216.
30. - مبینی، مهتاب؛ و دادور، ابوالقاسم، (1390). «ستون، نماد قدرت درمعماری هخامنشی». نگره، 19: 95-81.
31. - محمدی‌فر، یعقوب؛ و کرمی، حمیدرضا کرمی، (1401). «سازه‌های آبی هخامنشی حوضه آبریز رودخانه پلوار، ناحیه پاسارگاد». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه، ۶)۲۲(، 159-113. https://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-848-fa.html
32. - فتحی‌سوگلی‌تپه، افشین؛ مرتضوی، مهدی؛ و موسی‌پورنگاری، فریبا، (1400). «نقش منابع آبی در مکان گزینی محوطه‌های دوره هخامنشی دشت سیستان». تحقیقات منابع آب ایران، 17(3 ): 268-281. DOR: 20.1001.1.17352347.1400.17.3.15.0
33. - معتمدمنش، مهدی، (1397). «معماریِ سلطنتیِ هخامنشی: نمادی از فناوری و خِرد انسانی در عهد باستان». مطالعات معماری ایران، 7(13): 5-32. DOI: 10.22052/1.13.5
34. - نیکول، ماری‌بی؛ برگنر، کارل؛ تیلیا، اَن بریت؛ و سامنر، ویلیام ام.، (1393). بندهای باستانی دره درودزن. ترجمه محمدجعفر ملک‌زاده. نوید شیراز.
35. - ولایتی، رحیم، (1389). «تاثیر هنر ملل تابعه امپراتوری هخامنشیان بر هنر و معماری آنها». باغ نظر، 7(14): 87-94. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_21.html
37. - Afkhami, B. & Khosravi, Z., (2019). “The Meaning and Function of the Persian Garden (With an Emphasis on the Achaemenid Period)”. Iranian Studies, 8(2): 21-37. DOI: 10.22059/jis.2019.71431 (In Persian).
38. - Akbari, A. & Fattahi Masoum, A. S., (2016). “Investigating the influence of Urartian architecture on Achaemenid architecture: A case study of the Apadana Palace in Susa”. Journal of History Research, 11(44): 15–48. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/history/Article/942824. (In Persian).
39. - Alley, R. B., Marotzke, J., Nordhaus, W. D., Overpeck, J. T., Peteet, D. M., Pielke, R. A. & Wallace, J. M., (2003). “Abrupt climate change”. Science, 299(5615): 2005-2010. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1081056
40. - Amanollahi, H., (2010). “Recent investigations on the Achaemenid stone quarries in the Marvdasht area”. Archaeology and History, 48: 37–48. (In Persian).
41. - Amirshahkermi, A., (2004). Geological report and tectonic analysis of the Persepolis wall. Archives and Documentation Center of the Persepolis-Parseh Site. (In Persian).
42. - Amirshahkermi, S. A., (2006). “A re-examination of the engineering of Khaju Bridge”. Golestan-e Honar, 6: 81–94. (In Persian).
43. - Ansari Lari, A, & Ansari, M., (2016). “Estimate the Amount of Soil Erosion in Marvdasht Plain (Iran, Fars) by Rusle Model”. Quantitative Geomorphological Researches, 4(4): 134-149. (In Persian).
44. - Asadi, A. & Mansouri, M., (2023). “Excavation of the brick watercourse in the courtyard 17 of the Treasury at Persepolis”. In H. Fadaei, S. Delshad, M. Badrbar, & M. J. Oladhossin (Eds.), Kar-namagi Parsa (pp. 1–29). Parthava Publications. (In Persian).
45. - Bergner, C., (1937). “Bericht Uber Unbekannte Achaemenidische Ruinen in der Ebene von Persepolis”. Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, 8: 1-4.
46. - Boucharlat, R. & Benesh, C., (2004). Geophysics Report in Pasargaddes 2003. Rapport Préliminaire de la Mission conjointe France – Iran.
47. - Boucharlat, R., De Schacht, T. & Gondet, S., (2012). “Surface reconnaissance in the Persepolis Plain (2005-2008). New data on the city organisation and landscape management”. in: Dariosh Studies II. Persepolis and Its Settlements: Territorial System and Ideology in the Achaemenid State, edited by: G. P. Baselo and A. V. Rossi. Napoli: 123–166.
48. - Brimblecombe, P., (2014). Environmental impacts on heritage sites: Long-term research and monitoring. In Smith, C., Burke, H., & de Leiuen, C. (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology (pp. 2543-2548). Springer.
49. - Cigna, F., Tapete, D. & Lee, K., (2018). “Geological hazards in the UNESCO world heritage sites of the UK: From the global to the local scale perspective”. Earth-Sci, 176: 166–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.016
50. - Claussen, M., (2008). Holocene rapid land cover change–evidence and theory. Natural Climate Colette, Climate change and world heritage. Report on predicting and man-aging the impacts of climate change on World Heritage and Strategy to assistStates Parties to implement appropriate management responses. UNESCOWorld Heritage Centre, Paris, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444300932.ch9
51. - D'Angelis, G., (1987). “The essence of Achaemenid architecture in the 6th and 5th centuries BCE”. Asar, 22(23): 13–24. (A. Karimi, Trans.). (In Persian).
52. - DeMenocal, P. B., (2011). “Climate and human evolution”. Science, 331(6017): 540-542. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190683
53. - Emami, M., Eslami, M., Fadaei, H., Karami, H. R. & Ahmadi, K., (2018). “Mineralogical– Geochemical Characterization and Provenance of the Stones Used at the Pasargadae Complex in Iran: A New Perspective”. Archaeometry Journal. Doi: 10.1111/arcm.12395.
54. - Folke, C., (2006). “Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses”. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
55. - Gómez-Baggethun, E., Corbera, E. & Reyes-García, V., (2013). “Traditional ecological knowledge and global environmental change: Research findings and policy implications”. Ecology and Society, 18(4): 72. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06288-180472
56. - Gondet, S., (2015). “Strategies for the Operation of Stone in Persepolis. Ghent: Ghent University”. Iranica Antiqua, 279-327.
57. - Gondet, S., Mohammadkhani, K., Farjamirad, M., Ibnoeirida, N., Zare Kordshouli, F., Karami, H. R. & Laisney, D.. (2018). “Field Report on the 2015 Current Archaeological Works of the Joint Iran-French Project on Pasargadae and its Territory”. Iranian Heritage Studies, University of Shahid Beheshti, 1 (1): 60-87.
58. - Guidi, Giolj F., Rahbar, Sh., Rahmati, S., Sheikholeslami, R., Soleimani, M., Trojsi, G. & Zare, A., (2017). “Preliminary Diagnostic Study of the Stone on the Persepolis Terrace”. In: From Palace to Town, vol. 1, Topography, Diagnostic and Conservation. Ed: Askari Chaverdi, A., & Callieri, P. Rome.
59. - Hekmatzadeh, A. K., Mahboubi Niazmandi, M. & Binish, S. M., (2017). Seismic investigation of the eastern structure of the Gate of All Nations using the discrete element method. Shiraz Industrial University, Library and Documentation Center of the Persepolis World Heritage Site. (In Persian).
60. - Howard, A. J., (2013). “Managing global heritage in the face of future climate change: The importance of understanding geological and geomorphological processes and hazards”. Int. J. Herit, 19: 632–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.681680
61. - ICOMOS Climate Change and Cultural Heritage Working Group. )2019(. The Future of Our Pasts: Engaging Cultural Heritage in Climate Action. International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS).
62. - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -IPCC. (2022). Climate change. 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
63. - Karami, H. R., (2022). Two seasons of archaeological excavation at the Achaemenid Didegan Dam. Persepolis World Heritage Site Archive. (In Persian).
64. - Karami, H. R., (2023). “Achaemenid water structures and water management in the Polvar river basin”. Doctoral dissertation, Bu-Ali Sina University of Hamedan. (In Persian).
65. - Karami, H. & Talibian, M. H., (2012). “Water management of Pasargad region
66. in Achaemenid period”. Modares Archaeological Researches, 5 & 6 (10 & 11):
67. 216-242. (In Persian).
68. - Karami, M., (2017). “Pasargadae in the 5th millennium BCE”. In: M. H. Talebian & H. Fadaei (Eds.), Pasargadae 1: Collection of Articles on Conservation, Archaeology, Architecture, Geology, Anthropology, and Tourism (pp. 5–18). Book-e Bahar Publications. (In Persian).
69. - Khabar Online. (2017, November 16). Achaemenid buildings resistant to earthquakes. Retrieved from: https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/728037/. (In Persian).
70. - Kiani, T., Ramesht, M. H., Maleki, A. & Safakish, F., (2017). “Analyzing the Impacts of Climate Change on Water Level Fluctuations of Tashk and Bakhtegan Lakes and Its Role in Environmental Sustainability”. Open Journal of Ecology, 7: 158-178. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2017.72012
71. - Kleiss W., (1982). “Safavidische Staudämme bei Saveh und Qom”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran,15: 361-374
72. - Kleiss W., (1987). “Staudämme bei Qaderabad (Fars) und südwestlich von Kashan. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran 20, 89-106
73. - Kleiss, W., (1991). “Wasserschutzdamme und kanalbauten in umgebung von, Pasargadae”. Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, 24: 23-30.
74. - Mobini, M. & Dadvar, A., (2011). “Columns, a symbol of power in Achaemenid architecture”. Negareh, 19: 81–95. (In Persian).
75. - Mohammadifar, Y. & Karami, H. R., (2022). “Achaemenid Water Structures in the Catchment Area of Pelvar River - Pasargad District”. Parseh Archaeological Studies, 6(22): 113–159. https://dx.doi.org/10.30699/PJAS.6.22.113. (In Persian).
76. - Fathi Sogolitapeh, Sh., Mortazavi, M. & Mosapour Negari, F., (2021). “Water Resources Role in Location of Achaemenid Settlements in the Sistan Plain”. Iran-Water Resources Research, 17(3): 268-281. (In Persian).
77. - Motamedmanesh, M., (2018). “Achaemenid Imperial Architecture: a Symbol of Technology and Wisdom in Antiquity”. Journal of Architecture Studies, 7(13): 5-32. DOI: 10.22052/1.13.5 (In Persian).
78. - Nakashima, D. J., McLean, K. G., Thulstrup, H. D., Castillo, A. R. & Rubis, J. T., (2012). Weathering uncertainty: Traditional knowledge for climate change assessment and adaptation. UNESCO and UNU.
79. - Nicol, M. B., Bergner, C., Tilia, A. B. & Sumner, W. M., (2014). Ancient Bridges of the Doroodzan Valley. (M. J. Malekzadeh, Trans.). Navid Shiraz Publications. (In Persian).
80. - Nicol, M. B., (1970). “Rescue Excavation near Dorudzan”. East and West, 20 (3): 245-284.
81. - Nylander, C., (1970). Ionians in Pasargadae. Studies in Old Persian Architecture, Uppsala.
82. - Pacheco, J. J., Arzate, E., Rojas, M., Arroyo, V. Y. & Ochoa, O., (2006). “Delimitation of ground failure zones due to land subsidence using gravity data”. Engineering Geology, 84(40636): 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.12.003
83. - Pirisai, A., (2013). “Engineering analysis of the Apadana Palace at Persepolis using numerical methods (finite elements)”. Master's thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University, Fars Branch, Supervisor: Dr. S. A. Amir Shahkermi, Advisor: Dr. S. A. Sadrnejad. (In Persian).
84. - Raeisi-Ardakani, E., (2010). Hydrological and geological studies of the Persepolis World Heritage Site's buffer zone. Final Report, Earth Sciences Department, Shiraz University. Persepolis World Heritage Site Documentation Center. (In Persian).
85. - Rastbood, A. & Voosoghi, B., (2010). “Interseismic Deformation Study on the Collision Zone of Arabian and Eurasian Tectonic Plates in the Iddle-East Region Using an Analytical Model”. Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 4(2): 89-102. DOR: 20.1001.1.20080336.1389.4.2.6.1 (In Persian).
86. - Roaf, M., (1983). “Dovetail clamps and the Achaemenid Empire”. Iran, 21: 151-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/4299731
87. - Ruf, M., (2002). Reliefs and Carvings of Persepolis (H. Ghiyasi-Nejad, Trans.). Ganjineh-Honar Publications. (In Persian).
88. - Sabbioni, C., Brimblecombe, P. & Cassar, M., (2012). The atlas of climate change impact on European cultural heritage: Scientific analysis and management strategies. Anthem Press.
89. - Saeidi, Z., (2005). Geological report of the Persepolis World Heritage Site. Persepolis World Heritage Site Documentation Center. (In Persian).
90. - Sami, A., (1959). Archaeological Reports. Volume 4. Barna Publications, Shiraz. (In Persian).
91. - Sami, A., (1996). Pasargadae: The Capital and Tomb of Cyrus the Great. Revised by Dr. G. Vatandoust. Fars Studies Foundation Publications. (In Persian).
92. - Schmidt, E. F., (1957). Persepolis II: Contents of the Treasury and Other Discoveries. The University of Chicago Press.
93. - Sesana, E., Gagnon, A.S., Bertolin, C. & Hughes, J., (2018). “Adapting Cultural Heritage to Climate Change Risks: Perspectives of Cultural Heritage Experts in Europe”. Geosciences, 8(305): 1-23. doi:10.3390/geosciences8080305.
94. - Shahbazi, A. S., (2000). A Comprehensive Guide to Pasargadae. Fars Studies Foundation, First Edition. (In Persian).
95. - Shahbazi, A. S., (2005). A Documentary Guide to Persepolis. Parseh-Pasargadae Research Foundation. (In Persian).
96. - Shahcheraghi, A., (2010). Paradigms of the Garden: An Introduction to the Recognition and Revival of the Persian Garden. Tehran, Jihad University. (In Persian).
97. - Shobairi, A., (2017). “An introduction to irrigation and agriculture in ancient Pars: The Parseh-Pasargadae plains during the Achaemenid period”. In: M. H. Talebian & H. Fadaei (Eds.), Pasargadae 2: Collection of Articles on Conservation, Archaeology, Architecture, Geology, Anthropology, and Tourism (pp. 58–77). Book-e Bahar Publications. (In Persian).
98. - Soheil, M. A., (2020). The concept of monumentality in Achaemenid architecture. Translated by Dr. M. H. Talebian. Sefiran Publications. (In Persian).
99. - Stronach, D., (2000). Pasargadae: A Report on Excavations by the British Institute of Iranian Studies (H. Khatib-Shahidi, Trans.). Cultural Heritage Organization Publications. (In Persian).
100. - Sumner, W., (1986). “Achaemenid settlements in the Persepolis plain”. AJA, 90: 3–31 https://doi.org/10.2307/505980
101. - Sumner, W. M., (1986). “Achaemenid Settlement in the Persepolis Plain”. American Journal of Archaeology, 90(1): 3-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/505980
102. - Tilia, A. B., (1972). “Studies and Restorations at Persepolis and Other Sites of Fars. I (Reports and Memoirs)”. Director of the Series: Giuseppe Tucci. IsMEO, Rome, Vol. 16: 416 p.
103. - Tillia, A. B., (1968). “A study on the Methods of Working and Restoring Stone and on the Parts Left Unfinished in Achaemenian Architecture and Sculpture”. East and west. Ed: Tucci G. IsMEO, Rome, 18: 67-95.
104. - Tuplin, C., (1996). Achaemenid Studies, Historia Einzelschriften 99. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
105. - UNESCO World Heritage Centre, (1994). Nara Document on Authenticity. Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. World Heritage Committee, Eighteenth Session. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/nara94.htm.
106. - UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO.
107. - Velayati, R., (2010). “Influence Affiliated Nations Art on the Achaemenid Art and Architecture”. Bagh-e Nazar, 7(14): 87-94. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_21.html (In Persian).
108. - Wright, G. R., (2005). Ancient Building Technology. vol. 2, Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004531543
109. - Zarei Kordeshouli, F. & Karami, H. R., (2016). “Archaeological study of the Pasargadae district”. Persepolis World Heritage Site Archive (unpublished). (In Persian).
110. - Zeidi, M., (2017). “Newly discovered sites from the 5th millennium BCE in the Belagh River Valley and the Pasargadae plain”. In: M. H. Talebian & H. Fadaei (Eds.), Pasargadae 2: Collection of Articles on Conservation, Archaeology, Architecture, Geology, Anthropology, and Tourism (pp. 30–40). Book-e Bahar Publications. (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.