Danesh
Hefazat va Maremat
Volume 6, Issue 1 (6-2023)
KCR 2023, 6(1): 38-49 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Razani M, Shojai Maleki Z. A Typological Investigation of Forged Historical and Cultural Ceramics in Iran. KCR 2023; 6 (1) :38-49
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-79-en.html
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-79-en.html
Associate Professor, Faculty of cultural materials conservation, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Iran.
Abstract: (1550 Views)
the issue of forgery is of great importance in studying the authenticity of artistic and historical objects in the field of cultural artifacts. Ceramic, has been one of the most important human achievements that has subjected to various forms of forgery throughout history. Determining the authenticity of ceramic works requires understanding the multi-faceted nature of the material composition, construction methods, and decoration of the objects, as well as recognizing different types of forgery. Evaluating forgery in ceramic objects requires an assessment of the artistic-historical and aesthetic aspects of the crafted object, the authenticity of the manufacturing technology and production component, and the authenticity of subsequent interventions and additions. Therefore, determining authenticity in the face of forgery requires a specialized perspective and approach towards suspicious objects. This article aims to explore the various types of forgery in ceramics and examine the typology and methods of forgery in historical and cultural ceramics of Iran. The results, regardless of the historical context of forgery, indicate the development of forgery in ceramic objects during recent centuries and its presence in the antique market and the conservation of historical artifacts.
Type of Study: Research, Original, Regular |
Subject:
Archaeometry and authenticity assessment of museum objects and historical-cultural properties.
Received: 2024/11/6 | Accepted: 2023/11/1 | Published: 2023/11/1
Received: 2024/11/6 | Accepted: 2023/11/1 | Published: 2023/11/1
References
1. Caple, Chris. (2006). Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. Routledge.
2. Crddoc.P. (2009).“Scientific investigation of copies, fakes Forgevis”. Butterworth Heinemann.
3. Edwards, H. G., & Vandenabeele, P. (Eds.). (2012). Analytical archaeometry: selected topics. Royal Society of Chemistry.
4. Oddy, Andrew (Ed.). (1992). The art of the conservator. London: British Museum Press.
5. Scott, David A. (2016).“Authenticity, Restoration, Forgery”. In The potential of X-radiography. Etairia Kritikon Istorik on Meleton, pp. 367-380.
6. Watson, Oliver. (2004). "Fakes and forgeries in Islamic Pottery." Oriente moderno, 84(2), 517-540.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |