Danesh
Hefazat va Maremat
Volume 8, Issue 1 (6-2025)
KCR 2025, 8(1): 105-108 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mokhtari Taleghani E. A Note on the Book :The Interaction of Restoration and Architectural History in Iran. KCR 2025; 8 (1) :105-108
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-282-en.html
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-282-en.html
Abstract: (3107 Views)
This note reviews the book "The Interaction of Restoration and Architectural History in Iran" by Zaatollah Nikzad. The author highlights that this book, emphasizing the relationship between restoration and architectural history, addresses the necessity of preserving architectural works, especially from the perspective of understanding and transmitting the embedded messages within them. The author argues that restoration should not merely be seen as an executive task but as an interpretive and research process, aiming to understand both the architecture and its history. Restorers must benefit from diverse sciences and, in addition to their artistic skills, should possess a proper understanding of architectural history and the creators of historical works. Mokhtari emphasizes that restorers, along with their scientific and technical skills, should engage with historiography and cultural understanding of architectural works, and this understanding should be incorporated into the restoration process. Architectural history must be documented precisely in interaction with the performed restorations to provide primary data for researchers. Ultimately, Mokhtari introduces the restorer as a custodian of architectural history and science, arguing that they should, with precision and responsibility, preserve historical information and evidence and pass them on to future generations. The book "The Interaction of Restoration and Architectural History in Iran" highlights the significance of this new approach in restoration, which should be regarded as the first step in research on Iranian architectural conservation and history.
Keywords: Conservation, Architecture History, Heritage Preservation, Restoration, Interpretation, Architectural Historiography, Architectural Conservation, Cultural Understanding, Iranian Architecture, Research, Preservation Methodology.
Type of Study: notes, article critiques and opinion |
Subject:
studying pathology and technologies of abjects
Accepted: 2025/06/21 | Published: 2025/06/21
Accepted: 2025/06/21 | Published: 2025/06/21
References
1. Ahmer, C. (2020). Riegl’s ‘Modern Cult of Monuments’ as a theory underpinning practical conservation and restoration work. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 26(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2020.1738727
2. Brandi, C. (2005). Theory of restoration (G. Basile, Ed.; C. Rockwell, Trans.). Nardini Editore & Istituto Centrale per il Restauro.
3. Dilthey, W. (2002). The formation of the historical world in the human sciences (R. A. Makkreel & F. Rodi, Eds.). Princeton University Press.
4. Nikzad, Z. (2025). The interaction of restoration and architectural history in Iran. Institute for the Compilation, Translation, and Publication of Artistic Works, Academy of Arts.
5. Schleiermacher, F. (1998). Hermeneutics and criticism and other writings (A. Bowie, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |