logo
Volume 46, Issue 109 (8-2025)                   Athar 2025, 46(109): 183-204 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Esmaeelbeigi F, Nekoolaal Tak M, Seyed Bagheri F. (2025). Analysis of the Historical and Content Developments of Asar Journal. Athar. 46(109), 183-204. doi:10.22034/Athar.1915
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-1915-en.html
1- Ph.D. Student in Tourism, Department of Tourism, Faculty of Tourism, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Ph.D. Student in Tourism, Department of Tourism, Faculty of Tourism, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , seyedbagheri.fa@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2180 Views)
Abstract
This study investigates the historical trends, thematic developments, and scholarly collaboration patterns in articles published by the Asar Scientific Journal from 2014 to 2024 (1393–1403 in the Iranian calendar). By analyzing 303 published articles, the research seeks to determine the degree to which the journal’s content aligns with contemporary priorities in heritage conservation and restoration. Using a combined approach of scientometrics and content analysis, data were collected on authorship, institutional affiliations, keywords, methodologies, and collaboration structures, and analyzed using ATLAS.ti software. The findings indicate a relative stability in publication frequency, with a peak in 2022 (42 articles) and a low point in 2016 (22 articles). Thematic analysis shows a predominance of social, historical, and architectural studies, while technological and economic aspects remain underexplored. For context, only one article in the entire decade focused on economics, while technology-related papers rarely engaged with modern digital applications. Geographically, most contributions originate from Iran, particularly Isfahan, Tehran, and East Azerbaijan, although limited international comparisons with Turkey, China, and Russia were also observed. Collaboration networks reveal the central role of the Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute, supported by universities such as Islamic Azad University and Isfahan University of Art. However, engagement with industry and governmental bodies remains limited, highlighting a gap between research and policy. Overall, while Asar demonstrates strong academic visibility, future growth depends on expanding its thematic scope to include economic dimensions, technological innovation, and pressing national challenges such as water scarcity and climate change. Strengthening international collaborations and diversifying methodological approaches could further enhance the journal’s contribution to sustainable heritage conservation and increase its real-world impact.
Keywords: Scientometrics, Asar Journal, Historical Heritage Conservation and Restoration, Scientific Collaboration Networks, Emerging Research Trends, Scholarly Genealogy, PESTEL Model.

Introduction
The Asar Journal, published by the Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism in Iran, represents one of the most influential academic platforms for the dissemination of knowledge in heritage conservation, restoration, architecture, and related cultural studies. As the first specialized journal in this field established after the Islamic Revolution, and holding a “B” rating from the Ministry of Science alongside an ISC classification, its academic standing is well-established. Since its establishment, the journal has played a critical role in shaping scholarly debates within the national context, while also contributing to broader regional dialogues. Yet, despite its longstanding reputation, there has been limited systematic investigation into how effectively the journal reflects the evolving needs of both academia and society. This is particularly crucial in the face of pressing national and global challenges such as climate change, water scarcity, urban transformation, and the integration of digital technologies into heritage management. This study addresses this research gap by examining the journal’s alignment with these contemporary priorities.
In the last decade, the academic publishing landscape in Iran has undergone significant transformation, mirroring global trends. Growing internationalization, the digitalization of research outputs, and the increasing importance of scientometric and genealogical analyses have compelled journals to adapt their editorial policies and thematic orientations. In this regard, evaluating the thematic evolution of 
Asar is essential for understanding its responsiveness to emerging scientific, cultural, and social priorities. A genealogical approach, inspired by Foucault, allows for a deeper analysis of the historical processes and intellectual shifts that have shaped the knowledge produced within its pages. The journal’s potential role extends beyond academic discourse; it can serve as a vital bridge between researchers, policymakers, and practitioners in heritage conservation, thereby contributing to sustainable cultural development. The effectiveness of this role, however, depends on its ability to foster diverse collaborations and address practical, real-world problems.
The present study, therefore, aims to conduct a comprehensive scientometric and genealogical analysis of 
Asar over a ten-year period (2014–2024) to address three main objectives. First, it analyzes the historical trends and content changes to evaluate the journal’s role in knowledge dissemination. Second, it assesses the alignment of published articles with the current needs and priorities of the heritage sector. Third, it examines the degree of theoretical coherence or diversity within the journal’s publications. By applying analytical frameworks, including a PESTEL analysis, the research seeks to identify strengths and weaknesses in the journal’s thematic coverage across political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal dimensions. In doing so, the study provides evidence-based insights and strategic recommendations that may guide future editorial strategies and enhance the journal’s impact in both national and international contexts.

Discussion
This analysis of 303 articles from the Asar journal confirms its established position in Iranian academia while simultaneously revealing critical areas for strategic development. The findings illustrate a significant thematic imbalance, which, when viewed through the PESTEL framework, shows a clear concentration on social, historical, and environmental dimensions. While this focus reflects traditional strengths in humanities research, the pronounced underrepresentation of economic and modern technological topics points to a potential disconnects with key contemporary challenges in heritage management. The scarcity of research on topics like project budgeting or the economic impacts of conservation, alongside the limited engagement with crucial technologies such as digitalization and 3D scanning, suggests that the journal may not be fully equipping its readership to address the practical and financial realities of sustainable heritage development.
Methodologically, the predominance of qualitative and case-study approaches is consistent with the nature of heritage studies but also presents a limitation. This homogeneity may restrict the generalizability of findings and inhibit broader comparative analysis. To enhance the robustness of its published research, the journal could benefit from actively encouraging a greater diversity of research designs, particularly the integration of analytical or mixed-methods approaches that can provide more generalizable insights.
The analysis of collaboration networks highlights another crucial gap: the disconnect between academic research and its practical application. While the Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute serves as a strong central hub for academic collaboration, the limited engagement with governmental and industrial sectors is a significant weakness. This finding suggests that the valuable knowledge produced within the journal’s pages may not be effectively translated into actionable policies or industry practices. Fostering stronger, formalized partnerships between researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals is therefore essential for bridging this gap and maximizing the real-world impact of the research.
Finally, the study reveals that academic output is not produced in a vacuum; publication trends appear to be influenced by the broader socio-political context within Iran. This interconnectedness underscores the journal’s potential to serve as a chronicler of national priorities and challenges. By strategically diversifying its thematic scope, promoting methodological innovation, and fostering cross-sectoral collaborations, the Asar journal can evolve from a respected academic repository into a more dynamic and influential force in shaping the future of sustainable heritage conservation.

Conclusion
This study concludes that while the “Asar” Scientific Journal has an established position within the field of heritage conservation and restoration in Iran, it possesses significant untapped potential for academic growth and broader impact. The research found that the journal has maintained a relative stability in its publication output over the past decade, with a peak of 42 articles in 2022 and a low of 22 in 2016, and a strong thematic focus on social, historical, and architectural topics. However, there is a clear opportunity to expand its scope by addressing emerging research needs and contemporary national priorities, such as environmental crises and the need for economic sustainability.
Specifically, the findings highlight those topics related to modern technologies, such as digitization and computer modeling, along with the economic dimensions of cultural heritage, have received comparatively limited attention. To better address the real needs of the conservation field and contribute meaningfully to sustainable development, future research published in the journal should prioritize these underrepresented areas. Furthermore, the analysis of the scientific collaboration network revealed that while the Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute plays a central role with 17 key collaborations, interaction with industrial entities and governmental organizations remains limited, indicating a gap between academic research and practical application. The research also pointed to a methodological homogeneity, with a majority of studies employing qualitative approaches, suggesting a need for greater diversity through the inclusion of mixed-methods research.
To enhance the journal’s scholarly impact and its competitiveness on both national and international fronts, it is essential to foster stronger partnerships with non-academic stakeholders. By strategically creating special issues focused on technological innovation and the economics of cultural heritage, promoting methodological diversity, and bridging the gap between researchers and policymakers, the journal can better serve the academic and professional communities. Such efforts will allow “Asar” to contribute more effectively to the sustainable and resilient conservation of Iran’s invaluable cultural heritage in the face of contemporary challenges.
Full-Text [PDF 1230 kb]   (698 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Researches related to cultural heritage
Received: 2025/03/26 | Accepted: 2025/06/11 | Published: 2025/08/23

References
1. - اکرمی، موسی؛ و اژدریان‌شاد، و زلیخا، (1391). «تبارشناسی از نیچه تا فوکو». روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی، 18(70): 32-7. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_201.html
2. - بزرگی، اشرف‌السادات؛ غفوری، محبوبه؛ و میرحیدری، مریم‌السادات، (2014). تعیین منابع اثرگذار در پایان‌نامه‌های کارشناسی‌ارشد موجود در پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات طی سال‌های 1379-1388». مجلۀ دانش‌شناسی، 7 (26).https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/qje/Article/1040870 ‎
3. - پژوهشگاه میراث‌فرهنگی و گردشگری. نشریه‌ اثر. بازیابی‌شده از https://journal.richt.ir/index.php?sid=2
4. تقی‌زادفانید، ابوالقاسم؛ قدسی، پیمان؛ تیموری، ایرج؛ و معرفت، مریم، (1403). «تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی شهرهای پایدار (مطالعۀ الگوها و روندهای علمی 1970-2024)». توسعه محلی (روستائی-شهری)، 16(1): 229-263. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2024.374461.668849
5. - خاشعی ورنامخواستی، وحید؛ طیبی‌ابوالحسنی، سیدامیرحسین؛ و اسدی، خانقاه، (2018). «تبارشناسی مجلات مدیریت راهبردی در ایران و جهان». سیاست نامه علم و فناوری، 8(3): 33-49.‎
6. - رضایی، هانیه؛ و خنیفر، حسین، (1402). «مروری بر سرمایۀ اجتماعی، نوآوری و شبکۀ نوآوری: تحلیل کتاب سنجی از ادبیات». مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی، https://doi.org/10.22059/jscm.2024.369931.2476
7. - کرݣݣیمی‌خیاوی، ارسلان؛ پناهی، سیامک؛ و کریمی‌نیا، شهاب، (۱۴۰۳). «بررسی ریشه‌های شهرسازی فولدینگ بر اساس تبارشناسی میشل فوکو». تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، ۲۴ (۷۴): ۴۴۹-۴۳۰.https://doi.org/10.61186/jgs.24.74.18
9. - Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L. & Wouters, P., (2019). “Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories”. Sage Open, 9(1): 2158244019829575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
10. - Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, V. & Garolera, J. (2001). “Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constucts”. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(3): 492. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.492
11. - Akrami, M. & Azhdarian-Shad, Z., (2012). “Genealogy from Nietzsche to Foucault”. Methodology of Human Sciences, 18(70): 32–37. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_201.html (in Persian).
12. - Bordons, M. & Zulueta, M. A., (1999). “Evaluation of the scientific activity through bibliometric indices”. Revista espanola de cardiologia, 52(10): 790-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-8932(99)75008-6
13. - Bozorgi, A.-S., Ghafouri, M. & Mirheydari, M.-S., (2014). “Identifying influential sources in master’s theses at the Research Institute for Culture, Art and Communication during 2000–2009”. Journal of Knowledge Studies, 7(26). https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/qje/Article/1040870 (in Persian).
14. - Danvila-del-Valle, I., Estévez-Mendoza, C. & Lara, F. J., (2019). “Human resources training: A bibliometric analysis”. Journal of Business Research, 101: 627-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.026
15. - Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute. Asar Journal. Retrieved from: https://journal.richt.ir/index.php?sid=2
16. - Elnaggar, A., (2024). “Nine principles of green heritage science: life cycle assessment as a tool enabling green transformation”. Heritage Science, 12: 7. https://www.nature.com/articles/s40494-023-01114-z
17. - European Commission. (2022). Horizon Europe. Cultural Heritage Innovations.
18. - Fei, S. & Luther, K., (2024). Reexamining Technological Support for Genealogy Research, Collaboration, and Education.
19. - Foucault, M., (1972). The archaeology of knowledge Pantheon Books. New York.
20. - Friese, S., (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti. SAGE Publications.
21. - Gattiglia, G., (2025). “Managing Artificial Intelligence in Archeology. An overview”. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 71: 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2024.11.020
22. - Gingras, Y., (2016). Bibliometrics and research evaluation: Uses and abuses. Mit Press.
23. - Goh, K. C., Kurniawan, T. A., Goh, H. H., Zhang, D., Jiang, M., Dai, W., ... & Meidiana, C., (2024). “Strengthening infrastructure resilience for climate change mitigation: Case studies from the Southeast Asia region with a focus on wastewater treatment plants in addressing flooding challenges”. ACS ES&T Water, 4(9): 3725-3740. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00591
24. - Ha, J. H. & Boynton, L., (2014). “Has crisis communication been studied using an interdisciplinary approach? A 20-year content analysis of communication journals”. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 8(1): 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.850694
25. - Hammarfelt, B. & De Rijcke, S., (2015). “Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University”. Research Evaluation, 24(1): 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu029
26. - Harcourt, B. E., (2022). “A GENEALOGY OF ARCHAEOLOGY”. In: Young Foucault: The Lille Manuscripts on Psychopathology, Phenomenology, and Anthropology, 1952–1955 (pp. ix-xviii). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/bass20584-001
27. - Hipp, A. L., Larkin, D. J., Barak, R. S., Bowles, M. L., Cadotte, M. W., Jacobi, S. K., ... & Weiher, E., (2015). “Phylogeny in the service of ecological restoration”. Botany, 102 (5), https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500119
28. - ICOMOS. (2023). Guidelines for Heritage Impact Assessments.
29. - Karimi Khiavi, A., Panahi, S., & Karimnia, Sh., (2024). “Exploring the roots of folding urbanism based on Michel Foucault’s genealogy”. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 24(74): 430–449. https://doi.org/10.61186/jgs.24.74.18 (in Persian).
30. - Khashaei Varnamkhasti, V., Tayebi-Abolhasani, S. A. H., & Asadi, K., (2018). “A genealogy of strategic management journals in Iran and the world”. Science and Technology Policy Letter, 8(3), 33–49. (in Persian).
31. - Kovacs, A., Van Looy, B. & Cassiman, B., (2015). “Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research”. Scientometrics, 104: 951-983. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-015-1628-0
32. - Li, W., Xie, Q., Ao, J., Lin, H., Ji, S., Yang, M. & Sun, J., (2025). “Systematic review: a scientometric analysis of the status, trends and challenges in the application of digital technology to cultural heritage conservation (2019–2024)”. npj Heritage Science, 13(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01636-8
33. - Lian, Y. & Xie, J., (2024). “The evolution of digital cultural heritage research: Identifying key trends, hotspots, and challenges through bibliometric analysis”. Sustainability, 16(16): 7125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167125
34. - Liu, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Y. & Pan, C., (2019). “Hot topics and emerging trends in tourism forecasting research: A scientometric review”. Tourism Economics, 25(3): 448-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618810564
35. - Moed, H. F., (2017). Applied evaluative informetrics (p. 312). Berlin: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60522-7
36. - Mohamed, B. & Marzouk, M., (2023). “Bibliometric analysis and visualisation of heritage buildings preservation”. Heritage Science, 11(1): 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00947-y
37. - Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D. C., Poloczanska, E. S., Mintenbeck, K., Tignor, M., Alegría, A., ... & Okem, A. (2022). Summary for policymakers.
38. - Reher, D. S., (2024). Family history at the crossroads: reflections on past, present, and future challenges. Genus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-024-00235-y
39. - Rezaei, H., & Khenifar, H., (2023). “A review of social capital, innovation, and innovation networks: A bibliometric analysis of the literature”. Journal of Social Capital Management. https://doi.org/10.22059/jscm.2024.369931.2476 (in Persian).
40. - Sugimoto, C. R. & Larivière, V., (2018). Measuring research: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780190640118.001.0001
41. - Tang, Y., Liu, L., Pan, T. & Wu, Z., (2024). “A bibliometric analysis of cultural heritage visualisation based on Web of Science from 1998 to 2023: a literature overview”. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03567-4
42. - Taghizadeh-Fanid, A., Ghodsi, P., Teymouri, I., & Marefat, M., (2024). “A bibliometric analysis of sustainable cities: A study of scientific patterns and trends (1970–2024)”. Local Development (Rural–Urban), 16(1): 229–263. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrd.2024.374461.668849 (in Persian).
43. - UNESCO. (2021). Sustainable Development and Cultural Heritage.
44. - Vieira, R. Q., Neves, V. R. & Balsanelli, A. P., (2022). “Temáticas editoriais da Revista Acta Paulista de Enfermagem: um estudo bibliométrico (1988-2017)”. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 35: eAPE00872. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2022AO0313345
45. - Waltman, L., (2016). “A review of the literature on citation impact indicators”. Journal of informetrics, 10(2): 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
46. - Yu, Y., Raed, A. A., Peng, Y., Pottgiesser, U., Verbree, E. & van Oosterom, P., (2025). “How digital technologies have been applied for architectural heritage risk management: a systemic literature review from 2014 to 2024”. npj Heritage Science, 13(1): 45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01558-5

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.