Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies

fa شناسایی الگوهای معماری خانه‌های تاریخی و ارزیابی پایداری آن‌ها با استفاده از فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای: نمونۀ موردی روستای یاسه‌چای چهارمحال‌وبختیاری Identifying Architectural Types of Historical Houses and Their Sustainability Assessment Using Analytic Network Process (ANP): A Case Study of Yase Chai Village, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province میان‌رشته‌ای Interdisciplinary پژوهشي Research <div style="text-align: justify;">خطر فرسودگی و تخریب مسکن ارزشمند سنتی در بافت‌های تاریخی روستاها را تهدید می‌نماید. شناسایی الگوهای معماری خانه‌های تاریخی و تحلیل پایداری آن‌ها برای حفاظت از ارزش‌های معماری سنتی و بهره‌گیری از آن‌ها در طرح‌های مسکن معاصر ضرورت دارد. این درحالی است که با وجود مطالعات متعدد در زمینۀ گونه‌شناسی خانه‌های سنتی و پایداری مسکن روستایی، تحلیل الگوهای معماری خانه‌ها کمتر دیده ‌شده ‌است. هم‌چنین تاکنون الگوهای معماری خانه‌های ارزشمند بافت تاریخی روستای یاسه‌چای استخراج و تحلیل نگردیده‌اند؛ لذا پرسش‌های اصلی پژوهش این است‌ که، الگوهای معماری خانه‌های تاریخی روستای یاسه‌چای کدام‌اند؟ و اولویت الگوهای معماری به‌دست‌آمده ازلحاظ پایداری به چه صورت است؟ هدف این مطالعه نیز، شناسایی الگوهای معماری مسکن در بافت تاریخی روستای یاسه‌چای چهارمحال‌وبختیاری و اولویت‌بندی آن‌ها برمبنای پایداری است. برای نیل به هدف پژوهش، ابتدا با مرور تحقیقات و با روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی، مؤلفه‌ها، معیارها و شاخص‌های پایداری مسکن روستایی استخراج گردید؛ سپس، مشابهت‌ها و تفاوت‌های خانه‌های بافت تاریخی روستای یاسه‌چای از جنبۀ خصوصیات معماری کلان، میانی و خُرد بررسی شد و برمبنای آن‌ها شش الگو برای خانه‌ها شناسایی شد. در مرحلۀ بعد، الگوهای شناسایی‌شده برمبنای پایداری با روش فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای (ANP) مقایسه و رتبه‌بندی گردیدند. الگوی معماری غالب بافت تاریخی روستا با بیشترین فراوانی، رتبۀ سوم پایداری را کسب نمود. با توجه به نتایج پژوهش، فراوانی بیشتر یک الگوی معماری به‌معنای ارجحیت آن الگو برای کاربرد در طراحی خانه‌های معاصر نیست؛ هم‌چنین آفتاب‌گیری، فرم و نحوۀ استقرار فضاهای زیستی و ایوان‌هایشان در طبقۀ اول و تعداد و کشیدگی حیاط مهم‌ترین خصوصیات معماری بودند که موجب تمایز الگوها از یک‌دیگر می‌شدند. برای بهبود پایداری الگوها و به‌کارگیری آن‌ها در طرح‌های مسکن معاصر پیشنهادهایی مانند اعطای تسهیلات مالی برای ایجاد فضاهای اقامتی در خانه‌های تاریخی و بررسی سازگاری ضوابط طرح هادی روستا با الگوهای معماری مسکن ارائه شده‌است. </div> <div style="text-align: justify;">Abstract The risk of deterioration and destruction threatens valuable traditional housing in the historical texture of villages. Identifying the architectural types of historical houses and analyzing their sustainability are necessary to protect traditional architectural values and use them in contemporary housing designs. While there are many studies on the typology of traditional houses and the sustainability of rural housing, the analysis of architectural types of houses has been less considered. Also, the architectural types of the valuable houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village have not been still extracted and analyzed. Therefore, the main research questions are, what are the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai Village? And what is the priority of the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai village regarding sustainability? This study also aims to identify the architectural types of houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village, Chaharmahal, and Bakhtiari Province and to prioritize them based on sustainability. The rural housing sustainability indicators were extracted to achieve the purpose of the research, first by reviewing research and using the qualitative content analysis method. Then, the similarities and differences of the houses in terms of macro-, meso-, and micro-scale characteristics were examined and based on them, six types were identified. In the next step, the identified housing types were compared and ranked based on sustainability using the analytical network process (ANP) method. The dominant architectural type of the village’s historical texture with the highest frequency has the third-highest rank for sustainability. According to the results, the greater frequency of a particular architectural type in a historical context does not necessarily indicate a preference for using that type in the construction of contemporary houses. In addition, the form and manner of establishing the living spaces and their porches on the first floor, and the number and length of the yards were the most important architectural features that distinguished the types from each other. To improve the sustainability of types and use them in contemporary housing designs, suggestions have been presented, such as granting financial facilities to create living spaces in historical houses and checking the compatibility of the rules of the village guidance [Hadi] plan with the architectural types of housing. Keywords: Architectural Type, Valuable Historical Texture, Sustainability of Rural Housing, Qajar Era, ANP. Introduction Although the historical texture of Yase Chai village is registered in the list of national monuments, the architectural types of the houses have not been extracted and analyzed. Meanwhile, the new houses in the village are built without considering the architectural values of its historical texture. Also, the protection and use of sustainable architectural types of historical houses can bring about a tourism boom. This study aims to identify and prioritize architectural housing types in the historical texture of Yase Chai Village based on sustainability.  Research questions: What are the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai Village? And what is the priority of the architectural types of historical houses in Yase Chai village regarding sustainability? Research method: The statistical society included all the houses in the historical texture of Yase Chai. Purposeful sampling was used and 10 prominent houses were selected as representatives of the existing valuable houses of historical texture. Identifying the architectural characteristics of each house was done in three dimensions. Then, the partial types of each characteristic were extracted by comparing and examining the similarities and differences between the samples. Six final types were obtained in the next step based on partial types. In the third step, the types were ranked based on the sustainability of rural houses through the analytic network process (ANP). Rural Housing Sustainability Components The components of rural housing sustainability and their criteria include physical-environmental (environmental cleanliness, harmony with nature, and climatic comfort), physical-functional (flexibility, safety, and inclusiveness), physical-aesthetic (visual proportion and vernacular identity, and sensory richness), economic (livelihood and economic costs) and socio-cultural (lifestyle and privacy). Architectural Characteristics of Houses Living spaces had southwest and southeast lighting. The average ratio of mass to the land area of houses is 0.8. The dominant type of the mass shape is the central courtyard. The average ratio of length to width of the main courtyards is 1.79. The average percentage ratio of open, semi-open, and closed spaces to total spaces is 18, 19, and 63%, respectively. Most of the houses (70%) had direct access from the living room to the kitchen. On the main facades, the ratio of the area of the openings to the total area of the facade on the first floor was more than twice that of the ground floor. The average minimum width of the porches in the houses was 1.8 meters, which shows the flexibility of the porches. Final Types of Historical Houses Six final types were extracted. Type 1, with a frequency of 50%, is the dominant type. The first floor is L-shaped and receives southwest and southeast light. In type 2, the first floor receives light from the southwest, southeast, and northeast directions and has a U shape. In type three, the first floor gets southwest and northwest light; in type four, it gets southwest and northeast light. In type 4, the forms of the first floor are two opposite rectangles. In type 5, the form of the first floor is an incomplete U, and its light is from the southwest, southeast, and northwest. Type 6 is physically a combination of types 1 and 4. Analysis and Ranking of Types The most sustainable types and their scores are four (0.195), six (0.176), one (0.171), five (0.164), two (0.159), and three (0.134). Therefore, the fourth type is the most appropriate type to use in the contemporary housing designs of Yase Chai. In types four, five, and six, where a part of the first floor is separate from other parts of the first floor, there is a potential to use the separate part of the first floor as a living space for tourists and increase the level of livelihood. The types one and five have fewer facades with openings than other types, increasing climate comfort. The type one is also preferable to others in terms of view control from the entrance to the courtyard. There are two courtyards separated from each other in type six, which helps to provide more privacy. Conclusion In this research in the first step, houses of the historical texture of Yase Chai village were investigated in terms of macro (orientation and lighting, characteristics of mass and form, characteristics of courtyards and structures, and materials), meso (system of open, semi-open, and closed spaces, functions, interior spaces, and facades), and micro-architectural characteristics (entrance, porch, and portico, and details of the building) and their partial types were extracted. In the second step, based on the partial types, six final types were obtained. Sun exposure, the form and manner of establishing the living spaces and their porches, and the features of the yards were the most important factors that distinguished the types from each other. In the third step, the types were ranked based on the physical-environmental, physical-functional, physical-aesthetic, economic, and social-cultural components and their subset criteria and indicators using the analytical network process method. It is suggested to grant financial facilities to strengthen the structure and create living spaces in historical houses. It is also suggested to revise the rules of the village guidance plan and check their compatibility with the architectural types of the historical housing. For example, with the condition of providing proper lighting and ventilation of the interior spaces and coordinating the new designs with sustainable types, the maximum occupancy level should be increased from 60% to 80%. In addition, it is suggested to allocate financial facilities to implement new housing projects with the condition of coordination with the architectural types of the village. The results of the current study demonstrated that the greater frequency of a particular architectural type in a historical context does not necessarily indicate a preference for using that type in the construction of contemporary houses. Acknowledgment We are grateful to the kind residents who allowed us to visit and document their houses. This research did not receive any specific grant. Observation Contribution Sara Dadpour designed the concept and wrote the draft of the article, except for the research background and theoretical foundations. Sajede Kharabati wrote the research background and theoretical foundations and contributed to writing the introduction. Mozhdeh Rahimi conducted field visits and documented the houses. Mozhdeh Rahimi prepared the houses’ plans and 3D visualizations and contributed to the analysis of the architectural features of the houses. The authors’ contributions percentage is Sara Dadpour at 45%, Sajede Kharabati at 25%, and Mozhdeh Rahimi at 30%. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.</div> الگوی معماری, بافت باارزش تاریخی, پایداری مسکن روستایی, دورۀ قاجار, فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای. Architectural Type, Valuable Historical Texture, Sustainability of Rural Housing, Qajar Era, ANP. 389 416 http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/browse.php?a_code=A-10-646-1&slc_lang=fa&sid=1 Sara Dadpour سارا دادپور srdadpour@shahroodut.ac.ir 0000-0002-9628-9202 Yes Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Shahrood, Iran استادیار گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران Sajede Kharabati ساجده خراباتی s.kharabati@shahroodut.ac.ir 0000-0001-5224-0709 No Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Shahrood, Iran مربی گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران Mozhdeh Rahimi مژده رحیمی mozhdehrahimi.m@gmail.com No Bachelor of Architecture, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Shahrood, Iran. کارشناسی مهندسی معماری، گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران