<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies</title>
<title_fa>مطالعات باستان‌شناسی پارسه</title_fa>
<short_title>Parseh J. Archaeol. Stud.</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://journal.richt.ir/mbp</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2645-5048</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2645-5706</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/PJAS</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>1036</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1400</year>
	<month>9</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2021</year>
	<month>12</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>5</volume>
<number>17</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>بررسی یافته‌های فرهنگی (کاشی و سفال) محوطۀ تاریخی کهنه‌گوراب، شهرستان املش و پیشنهادی برای گاه‌نگاری محوطه</title_fa>
	<title>Study of Cultural Findings (Tiles and Pottery) of Kohneh Gorab Historical Site, Amlash District and a Suggestion for the Chronology of the Site</title>
	<subject_fa>تخصصی باستان‌شناسی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Special Archeology</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;محوطه&#8204;های وابسته به سلسله&#8204;های محلی در شمال ایران، ازجمله مهم&#8204;ترین منابع برای درک حاکمیت سیاسی و فرهنگی این منطقه به&#8204;شمار می&#8204;رود. دیرپایی برخی از سلسله&#8204;های محلی موجب شکل&#8204;گیری استقرارهای قابل&#8204;توجهی در بسترهای متفاوت محیطی، ازجمله مناطق کوهستانی تا جنگلی گردیده است. کهنه&#8204;گوراب واقع&#8204;در دهستان املش شمالی یکی از نمونه&#8204;های قابل&#8204;ذکر در این زمینه است. این محوطه، ازجمله مناطق آباد در زمان حکومت آل&#8204;کیا در شرق گیلان بود. به&#8204;دلیل توجه باستان&#8204;شناسان به گورستان&#8204;های دوران تاریخی و عدم توجه به محوطه&#8204;های وابسته به سلسله&#8204;های محلی اسلامی، دانش ما در زمینۀ محوطه&#8204;های اسلامی گیلان بسیار اندک است. شناخت و تحلیل موقعیت مکانی و ارتباطی کهنه&#8204;گوراب به&#8204;عنوان یکی از بسترهای استقراری تحت&#8204;سیطرۀ سیاسی-فرهنگی خاندان آل&#8204;کیا در گیلان انجام پژوهش پیشِ&#8204;رو را ضروری نموده است. پژوهش حاضر در پی پاسخ به این پرسش&#8204;ها برآمده است که، با توجه به یافته&#8204;های فرهنگی (کاشی&#8204;ها و سفال&#8204;ها) محوطۀ کهنه&#8204;گوراب املش از منظر گاه&#8204;نگاری نسبی و در تناظر با متون تاریخی مرتبط، چه بازۀ زمانی برای این محوطه را می&#8204;توان پیشنهاد داد؟ و ارتباط درون و برون&#8204;منطقه&#8204;ای محوطۀ کهنه&#8204;گوراب با محوطه&#8204;های پیرامونی چگونه قابل توضیح است؟ مهم&#8204;ترین هدف پژوهش، تبیین گاه&#8204;نگارانه و هم&#8204;چنین بررسی روابط فرهنگی درون و برون&#8204;منطقه&#8204;ای براساس داده&#8204;های فرهنگی تعریف شده است. روش گردآوری اطلاعات به&#8204;صورت میدانی-اسنادی و روش پژوهش توصیفی-تحلیلی است. نتیجه آن&#8204;که مهم&#8204;ترین یافته&#8204;های فرهنگی محوطۀ کهنه&#8204;گوراب، ازجمله قطعات کاشی با لعاب تک&#8204;رنگ و نقوش گیاهی و هم&#8204;چنین سفالینۀ ساده با نقش&#8204;کنده، گلابه&#8204;ای، سفالینۀ لعاب&#8204;دار با لعاب تک&#8204;رنگ، نقش&#8204;کندۀ زیرلعاب، لعاب پاشیده، اسگرافیتو، نقاشی زیرلعاب مانند فیروزۀ قلم&#8204;مشکی، آبی و سفید حاکی از ارتباط فرهنگی با مناطق همجوار خود مانند تپۀ پنج&#8204;پیران لاهیجان، شهر اسلامی گسکر، قلعه&#8204;لیسار تالش (درون&#8204;منطقه&#8204;ای) است و هم&#8204;چنین نشانگر روابط با محوطه&#8204;های شاخصی چون: آمل، جرجان، نیشابور، ری و ساوه (برون&#8204;منطقه&#8204;ای) است. گاه&#8204;نگاری تطبیقی و مقایسه&#8204;ای این محوطه نشان&#8204;داد استقرار دست&#8204;کم از قرن 3 یا 4 ه&amp;zwj;.ق.، آغاز شده و تا سده&#8204;های 8 تا 10 ه&amp;zwj;.ق.، یعنی هم&#8204;زمان با حکومت خاندان آل&#8204;کیا در شرق گیلان تداوم داشته است. با به قدرت رسیدن شاه&#8204;عباس بزرگ صفوی، کم&#8204;کم این محوطه اعتبار خود را از دست داد و زلزله&#8204;های متوالی هم&#8204;زمان با عصر قاجاریه مزید بر علت گردید و بخش&#8204;های قابل&#8204;توجه این محوطه را تخریب نمود.&lt;/div&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The longevity of some local dynasties has led to the formation of significant settlements in different environmental contexts, including mountainous to forested areas of northern Iran. Kohneh Gorab located in North the Amlash This area was one of the inhabited areas during the reign of Al-e Kia in the east of the Gilan Province is one of the notable examples in this field. Recognition and analysis of the ancient location and communication of Kohneh Gorab as one of the settlements under the political-cultural control of the Al-e Kia family in the Gilan has necessitated the forthcoming research. The present study seeks to answer the following question: According to the cultural findings (tiles and pottery) of the ancient site of the Kohneh Gorab of the Amlash from the perspective of relative chronology and concerning related historical texts, what period can be for this site suggested? And how can the intra- and extra-regional connection of the old the Kohneh Gorab site with the surrounding areas be explained? The most important purpose of the study is a chronological explanation as well as the study of intra- and extra-regional cultural relations based on defined cultural data. The method of data collection is field-documentary and the research method is descriptive-analytical. The result is that the most important cultural finds of the Kohneh Gorab area, including pieces of tiles with monochromatic glazes and plant motifs, as well as plain pottery with carvings, Slip-Painted, glazed pottery with the monochromatic glazes, the underglaze engravers, the sprinkled glazes, the blue-white paints, the Sgraffiato paints, undergrowth paintings, indicates a cultural connection with its neighboring areas such as the Panjpiran Tepe of the Lahijan, Islamic city of the Gaskar, the Lisar Qaleh of the Talesh (intra-regional) and also indicates relations with landmarks such as the Amol, the Jorjan, the Neyshabur, the Rey and the Saveh (extra-regional). A comparative and comparative chronology of this area showed that the settlement began at least from the 3rd or 4th century AH and continued until the 8th to 10th centuries, AH, that is, at the same time as the rule of the Al-e Kia dynasty in eastern the Gilan.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Keywords:&lt;/strong&gt; Kohneh Gorab, Al-e Kia, Islamic Pottery, Tiles.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Archaeological studies in the Gilan Province in recent years have led to the identification of large Islamic sites that previously could only be recovered through historical texts. The Kohneh Gorab is one of these intermediate sites that has served as a link between its north and south. Information from historical texts has attributed the settlement in this area to the Al-e Kia family, while recent archaeological studies while confirming this attribution, have linked the settlement in this area to an older period. The main purpose of this research is the chronological study and analysis of the Kohneh Gorab site based on cultural data to identify its regional and supra-regional relationship. Important natural and historical sites, as well as destruction due to development activities, have been the most important necessities for documenting this area.&lt;br&gt;
The questions are as follows: Cultural findings (tiles and pottery) of the ancient site of the Kohneh Gorab of the Amlash in terms of relative chronology and concerning related historical texts, what period can be proposed for this site? And based on cultural findings and comparative studies of pottery species and tile pieces, how can the internal and external relations of the Kohneh Gorab site with the surrounding sites be explained?&lt;br&gt;
In the present study, pottery and tile pieces were collected from surface surveys in and around the historical site of the Kohneh Gorab and also drilled 15 test trench in predetermined places. For comparative studies, citation sources and descriptive-analytical methods were used in the research. The findings of this documentary method were analyzed to present the relative chronology and cultural relations within and outside the region.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The Tiles Sherds from the Kohneh Gorab&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Tile pieces obtained from the historical site of the Kohneh Gorab are of high quality. to make these tiles, which are geometric shapes such as squares, rhombuses, triangles, star shapes, as well as star and cross shapes, they used the molding method and prefabricated molds. The surface of all these tiles is covered with monochromatic under turquoise glazes, azure, green, yellow, black, and also plant motifs with a combination of green, black or blue, and white.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
From comparative studies of tiles in Islamic areas in the Gilan, we conclude that small tiles in the shape of pentagons, rhombuses, and triangles in historical buildings in the east and west of the Gilan, such as the Panjpiran tepe, the historic city of the Gaskar, the Qala-e-Rudkhan of the Fooman, which is almost contemporary in time. They are used with the ancient historical site of the KOhneh Gorab (Table 1).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The Pottery of the Kohneh Gorab Site&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
All pottery obtained from the Kohneh Gorab site can be divided into two general categories based on simple and glazed. Plain pottery is divided into two categories: unglazed and plain pottery and unglazed and patterned pottery. Glazed pottery is also divided into two categories: plain glazed and painted glazed. Glazed and plain pottery was divided into seven types based on the color of the coating: Unglazed and plain pottery in yellowish red, unglazed and plain pottery in reddish-brown, unglazed and plain pottery in bright red, unglazed and plain pottery in reddish yellow, unglazed and plain pottery in brown, unglazed and plain light brown pottery. According to typological studies, this type of pottery was common in many areas of the Gilan Province from the 4th to the 10th century AH (Jahani, 2011; Mirsalehi, 2019; Ramin, 2006).&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Most of the pottery obtained from the Kohneh Gorab site is wheel-made and a small number of them are hand-made. Some dishes have a flat bottom and some have a long, concave base. According to the available evidence; Most of this pottery was used daily. Unglazed and painted pottery of this site can be divided into two categories based on the type of pattern: unglazed pottery with engraving, pottery with the scarred pattern. The abundance of such pottery pieces informally leads to the idea that these two types are probably of local production; However, we have to wait until laboratory studies and definite assurance in this field.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The main data obtained from the field survey of the Kohneh Gorab site include pieces of tiles and pottery. The tile pieces are small in size and geometric shapes (square, rhombus, pentagonal and triangular), star-shaped, covered with monochromatic glazes of blue, green, and yellow. In some of these tiles, plant motifs including arabesque and leaves have been used. Comparatively comparing these tiles with other areas, there are many similarities between them and the tiles discovered from the Panjpiran tepe in the Lahijan related to the Kiai period. From the surviving cases of these tiles and similar ones, we can mention the examples in the religious buildings of the Lahijan and the Langrud. Other data that were abundantly obtained in this site are pottery pieces belonging to the Middle Ages and late Islam. Plain pottery with carved and without patterns has a higher percentage of all pottery. These species are probably locally produced. The next groups have the most abundance of pottery with underglaze, pottery with sprayed glaze, and Sgraffito pottery after plain pottery, respectively. The Sgraffito pottery discovered from the Kohneh Gorab is technically and artistically similar to the Amol tepe. Some of the samples are of higher quality and it is possible that they came to this place from the Amol region, others were produced locally by imitating the Amol species. The black painted under the turquoise glaze and white blue pottery are another part of the cultural data obtained from this site. The better quality and lower frequency of these parts raised the issue of their import unofficially. The results of the study of these data reveal the cultural connections of this site with sites in the Gilan province such as the Panjpiran tepe of the Lahijan, Islamic city of the Gaskar, the Lisar castle, and outside the Gilan province sites such as the Amol, the Jorjan, the Neyshabur, the Rey and the Saveh. Comparative analysis of the findings indicates the settlement between the 3rd to 4th and 8th to 10th centuries AH, in which the site was relatively stable; however, to provide an accurate chronology as well as to identify the extent of the dispersal of cultural deposits, it is necessary to conduct extensive and purposeful excavations.&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>کهنه‌گوراب, آل‌کیا, سفالینه‌های اسلامی, کاشی</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Kohneh Gorab, Al-e Kia, Islamic Pottery, Tiles.</keyword>
	<start_page>241</start_page>
	<end_page>264</end_page>
	<web_url>http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/browse.php?a_code=A-10-441-1&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Solmaz</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Raof</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>سولماز</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>رئوف</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>solmaz.raof@gmail.com</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid></orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>PhD in Archeology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran,</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>دکتری باستان‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس، تهران، ایران</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Ebrahim</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Raiygani</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>ابراهیم</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>رایگانی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>E.raiygani@neyshabur.ac.ir</email>
	<code></code>
	<orcid></orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Archeology and History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Neishabour University, Neishabour, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>استادیار گروه باستان‌شناسی و تاریخ، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه نیشابور، نیشابور، ایران</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
