Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies

Analyses of Cultural Materials from the Neolithic and Chalcolithic Periods at the Qela Zeka Site in Khorram Abad County, Lorestan

Mohammad Bahrami

Abstract
The Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods are the important periods of human life. The why and how of the transition process from the Paleolithic to the Neolithic in different regions is considered an important archaeological issue. Therefore, it is important to understand and study the sites related to this period to explain this process. Ghela Zeka Tape is located in Khorramabad, in the central Zagros region. Valuable information about the Neolithisation process, Neolithic, and Chalcolithic periods has been published from this area. Based on the results of the boundary determination, Ghela Zeka has an area of nearly three hectares. In this research, with the aim of introducing and explaining the data, the author has reviewed, studied, and compared the findings obtained from the Ghela Zeka, including stone tools, pottery sherds, and a sample of an animal figurine from the Neolithic and early Chalcolithic period. As a result of this research, was confirmed the possibility of the existence of layers from the Neolithisation period was raised and the presence of evidence from the pre-pottery and pottery Neolithic periods. These results were obtained from examining and comparing chipped stone materials such as various flake, mixed, pyramidal, and bullet-shaped cores, and tools such as notched, retouched blades/bladelets, and sickle blades, as well as pottery samples of the Roahel type. From the Chalcolithic period, evidence of pottery of the Bagh-e No and Giyan V types indicated a continuation of settlement from the Neolithic to the early Chalcolithic period. Based on radio carbon dating of the Bagh-e No culture and comparison with the Sialk I-III cultures on the Central Plateau, the Bagh-e No and Giyan V pottery cultures have been dated to the late 6th to late 5th millennium BC. As a result of this research, questions about the periods of the site and its role in the studies of this period are answered. The importance of this research is that by analyzing the materials of these important periods in Central Lorestan, it highlights the importance of future excavations to study the transition from Neolithic to Chalcolithic.
Keywords: Lorestan, Khorramabad, Neolithic, Chalcolithic, Qela Zeka.

Introduction
The beginning of agriculture and domestication, the creation of architecture and building houses with simple and primitive materials, and the increase in population are some of the prominent features of the Neolithic period. Referring to these changes and developments, Bar-yosef refers to it as the most vital human revolution after 2.5 million years of cultural growth and evolution (Bar-Yosef, 2001: 117). The first studies on the Neolithic in western Iran were carried out by Robert Braidwood in Kermanshah (Braidwood et al., 1961). After a hiatus of about 30 years, research on this period resumed with the excavation of the Chogha Golan (Zeidi & Conard, 2013), Sheikhi Abad (Matthews et al., 2013), and Eastern Chia Sbez (Darabi et al., 2011), which continues to the present (Darabi et al., 2024). During this period, the formation and expansion of early villages took place, which reflects a multifaceted development in the societies of the region in various economic, social, and ritual fields, which is divided into the following sub-periods: Transitional Neolithic (9700-8000 BC), Pre-Pottery Neolithic (8000-7000 BC), and Pottery Neolithic (7000-6000 BC) (Darabi, 2024: 8). The Central Zagros Chalcolithic period covers a period of two thousand years from 5500 to 3300 (Henrickson, 1991: 278). Until the 1970s, the Central Zagros Chalcolithic period chronology of western Iran was based on the Giyan sequence, which both McCan and Dyson published based on the typology of Giyan V pottery (Henrickson, 1985: 63). This period has been divided by Elizabeth Henrickson into three phases: Lower, Middle, and Upper (Henrickson, 1985:66). This period in Lorestan had its own unique characteristics, so that its Lower period was different from other areas of the Central Zagros and had its own culture with local characteristics, which is known as the “Bagh-e No culture”. After the Bagh-e No, it was replaced by a pottery culture known as the Se-Gabi (SGP) and the Giyan Vc, which was related to the Ubaid culture in Mesopotamia and which Hole called the “Daurai phase” in the Khorram Abad valley (Hole, 2007:72). The Upper Chalcolithic, like the previous period, had its own characteristics, which were more closely related to and more strongly influenced by the growing Uruk culture in Mesopotamia and Susa II in the Suziana Plain, which in the Central Zagros is comparable and recognizable with the Godin VI period (Young, 1969).
Since the Ghela Zeka Tape, with an area of nearly 3 hectares, has reliable and strong evidence of Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods in Khorram Abad, analyzing its cultural findings with the aim of introducing and explaining the importance of this work is an undeniable necessity. The evidence studied in this research shows that Ghela Zeka can have a prominent position as one of the key Neolithic and Chalcolithic sites in the Central Zagros. Given the extensive settlement and diversity of material finds, questions about the periods of settlement of the Tape, cultural interactions with surrounding areas, and its importance in studies of the Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic arise, which are addressed in this study. It seems that Ghela Zeka had settlements from different stages of the Neolithic period, which played an important role in the transition to the Early Chalcolithic and the Bagh-e No in Central Lorestan.

Identified Traces
Ghela Zeka is located in Dehpir district of the Khorram Abad county, 10 km northeast of Khorramabad city. This monument has a geographical location of 48° 46’ 67”, 33° 55’ 15” and 1475 masl (Fig. 1). The most important material findings from the Tape included chipped stones, pottery, and a clay figurine resembling boars.
The stone tools belonging to the Neolithic period were obtained from the excavated layers of the boundary determination pits, which included; various amorphous cores, pyramidal blades and blade lets and bullet cores, various types of simple and retouched blades, blade lets, chisels, scrapers, ridges and sickle blades (Figs. 3,4). The Ghela Zeka community mainly used chart in different colors and sometimes flint and obsidian to make and produce tools. The conglomerate outcrop 7 km west and southwest could have been the main source of this stone, which is distributed up to 3 km from the Tape (Fig. 2). Small fragments of obsidian in the layers of Ghela Zeka are an indication of trans-regional relations of the people of the site. Based on experimental studies in various sites in western Iran, this stone was probably supplied from the sources of Nimrud Dagh in southeastern Anatolia (Renfrew, 1969: 430; Darabi & Glascock, 2013; Pullar, 1990: 12).
A total of 16 source samples were obtained from the exploration of boreholes located in the field, including 5 blade and blade let, 7 amorphous cores, and 5 mixed cores. During the excavation, 32 stone tool samples were obtained. The Neolithic pottery of Lorestan is known as the Roahol phase (Bahrami & Fazeli Nashli, 2016: 32). This pottery was first identified from the Neolithic Roahol site in the Khorramabad valley (Bahrami et al., 2012), which can be compared with the pottery of Mohammad Jafar in the Alikosh of Dehloran (Bahrami & Mohammadian, 2025: 61). Several pottery sherds similar to Roahol pottery were found from the Ghela Zeka, two of which were painted (Figs. 5-6: No: 5,6). Also, a clay figurine resembling a boar was found in the Neolithic layers of borehole number 10, measuring about 5 cm in length and 4 cm in height (Fig. 7).
As mentioned earlier, the Early Chalcolithic in Lorestan is known as the Bagh-e No culture. Most of the pottery from this period was found from the surface survey (Fig. 6), and only 3 samples were obtained from the determine the boundary (Fig. 8). The pottery of this period has straight and elongated edges and due to insufficient and incomplete firing has a gray paste and a mixture of straw. Their outer surface coating is buff or orange, decorated mainly with geometric and rarely human and possibly plant decorations in black and red (Figs. 5,6, Table. 1). Young has classified the pottery of this period into two groups IA and IB. Young’s type IA pottery is a type of pottery with a mixture of straw and buff, which usually has thick walls, which Young has introduced as early pottery with a mixture of straw, and group IB he considers with the same characteristics but of the embossed type (Young, 1966:230). Goff has mentioned these potteries as early pottery (Goff, 1971:134). This type of pottery has also been reported in Chia Siah and Chia Zargaran of Tarhan (Schmidt et al., 1989; Goff, 1971), the upper layers of Abdul Hussein Tepe (Pullar 1990), and many sites in different cities of Lorestan.

Conclusion
Based on what has been said above, Ghela Zeka Tape encompasses a long settlement from the pre-pottery Neolithic period before the 7th millennium BC to the end of the 5th millennium BC. The presence of amorphous, pyramidal and mixed cores in this complex, along with ridges and dentils, indicates the possibility of settlement in the transitional Neolithic period before the 8th millennium BC. The presence and abundance of tools made on blades and blade lets, including sickle blades and bullet cores, reflects the existence of a possible agricultural community at Ghela Zeka in the 8th millennium BC. Ghela Zeka, like many Neolithic sites in western Iran, entered into trans-regional interactions during this period and received and produced obsidian chipped stones Given the area of the site, which is more than 3 hectares, this agricultural community was probably a settlement. No settlement of this period has been identified in Lorestan so far, and Ghela Zeka may be considered one of the most extensive Neolithic sites in western Iran. The discovery of an animal figurine could be a sign of a society with ritual and symbolic dimensions. Another important feature of Ghela Zeka is the presence of the Pre-pottery Neolithic following the Pottery Neolithic, which could help explain the transition between these two periods in the 7th millennium BC in the region and the differences in tool industries and livelihoods of its people. The continuity of settlement from the Neolithic to the Lower Chalcolithic is important, as reliable pottery evidence from the Bagh-e No and possibly Giyan V has been found. Perhaps one of the most important questions in the archaeology of Lorestan and western Iran, namely when, why and how the transition from the Neolithic to the Chalcolithic and its biological aspects, can be answered in scientific excavations. Based on available data, Ghela Zeka was inhabited until the late 5th millennium BC and then abandoned. Ultimately, an accurate understanding of the time and various aspects of life at Ghela Zeka requires scientific exploration and providing an absolute dating of it.

Reframing the Visual Evolution of the Cheetah from Prehistoric Times to the Late Islamic Period: An Iconographic Study of the Hunting Predator through Historical Texts and Archaeological Evidence

Ahad Variji

Abstract
Material remains bearing figurative representations constitute one of the most significant repositories of historical-cultural information within archaeology and art history. Among such remains, artefacts depicting the cheetah are of particular importance. The interpretation of surviving cheetah imagery in ancient artefacts undoubtedly yields a deeper understanding of coexistence and confrontation between human societies and this predatory animal. Archaeological findings and iconographic analyses conducted thus far on the cheetah indicate that variables such as geographical distribution, temporal multiplicity, and the frequency of cultural interactions have played a considerable role in explaining the transformation of cheetah motifs across different historical periods. Accordingly, after examining the history of studies on the cheetah, as well as investigating the developmental trajectory of cheetah images among coeval cultural horizons in Iran—which have predominantly confined the origin of cheetah motifs from prehistoric times to the late Islamic period to two interpretive models, namely the narrative-mythological and the ritual-ideological—the present study seeks to examine visual examples of the cheetah, while emphasizing the role of predatory hunting animals in human societies, and furthermore to highlight the importance of the functionalist-subsistence interpretive model. This model is grounded in historical texts, specifically hunting manuals, as one of the fundamental causes for the representation of cheetah images, in contrast to the two aforementioned models. For this purpose, archaeological evidence together with comparative studies of historical texts, through an analytical-comparative method, have been re-examined to demonstrate that functionalist interpretations concerning the capture and domestication of this predatory animal by cheetah-keepers in the natural world are of equal or even greater importance than prevalent mythological and ideological interpretations, which are exclusively concerned with political authority and ritual legitimation within the cultural sphere.
Keywords: Hunting Cheetah (Cheetah as a Hunting Auxiliary), Archaeological Findings, Historical Texts, Functionalist-Subsistence Interpretive Models, Mythological and Ideological Interpretive Models.

Introduction
Material remains featuring cheetah depictions are vital sources for understanding the coexistence of human societies and this predator. Previous iconographic analyses suggest that geographical distribution, temporal shifts, and cultural interactions have shaped the evolution of cheetah motifs across rock reliefs, seals, and pottery. While researchers typically attribute these stylistic transformations to decorative, mythological, or ritual concepts, this study proposes a “functionalist -economic” interpretive model as a fundamental driver for these representations.
Tracing cheetah imagery from prehistory to the late Islamic period through archaeological evidence and historical texts—such as hunting treatises (šikār-nāmes) and training manuals (bāz-nāmes) like the Bazname-ye Nasavi—this research challenges purely symbolic readings. The central hypothesis is that the domestication and control of the wild cheetah in Iran were primarily pragmatic processes tied to survival. Ancient humans first harnessed the animal’s hunting abilities to secure food and mitigate risks in the open landscapes of the Iranian plateau, only later embodying these functional roles in mythical and ideological discourses.
By employing an analytical-comparative method across field data from various Iranian regions and reliable library sources, the findings indicate that functionalist interpretations (related to capture and taming) hold equal or greater significance than purely ideological motifs of political authority. Ultimately, this research emphasizes that cheetah representations in ancient Iranian artifacts reflect humanity’s core subsistence concerns and evolutionary adaptation. The functionalist model of human-cheetah coexistence is a long-standing reality that should not be overlooked in favor of purely symbolic or mythical interpretations.

Discussion
This article examines the representation of the cheetah in two principal categories of historical written sources: literary texts (hunting poetry and travel narratives) and technical manuals (bāznāmas/šikārnāmas). Findings indicate that in literary sources, the cheetah is predominantly depicted with attributes such as speed, agility, and ceremonial status within the royal court. Poetic examples from Ferdowsi (“one hundred and sixty cheetah handlers”) and Gorgani (“you think we are the deer and he is the cheetah”) suggest that the cheetah served not only as a hunting companion but also as a symbol of royal authority over nature. Travel accounts, such as Chardin’s, provide tangible details regarding the practice of carrying the cheetah on horseback and removing its blindfold at the moment of the hunt.
The analytical turning point, however, lies in the examination of technical manuals, particularly the Bāznāma-ye Nasavi. This monumental work constitutes the most comprehensive historical document concerning the capture, domestication, and training of cheetahs. Nasavi details a seven-stage process: digging pits for live capture, transferring the animal to royal facilities, sleep and food deprivation, training on a “clay donkey,” mounting a horse, entering the hunting ground, and ultimately achieving hunting success.
The principal contribution of this article resides in its systematic correlation of these technical texts with six visual specimens. The Jiroft image (Fig. 12), depicting a human holding a cheetah’s tail, corresponds precisely with the role of the “tail-holder” (domdār) described in the Bāznāma-ye Nasavi. The Sanandaj Museum bowl (Fig. 13), showing a cheetah springing onto the back of a clay bull, directly represents the “clay donkey” training stage. The Samanid-era vessel (Fig. 14), portraying a cheetah seated on a horse, aligns perfectly with descriptions found in hunting manuals.
In conclusion, this article demonstrates that a functionalist-biological reading of cheetah imagery—grounded in written evidence from bāznāmas—possesses equal validity and fundamentality to mythic and ideological interpretations, and may, in certain historical contexts, constitute the very foundational basis for these representations.

Conclusion
The history of studies and interpretations of the visual evolution of the cheetah indicates that cheetah motifs from the fourth millennium BCE to the Islamic period developed gradually, moving from a “decorative singular depiction” toward “mythological-ritual narrations” and finally to “political-ideological symbols.” As demonstrated, most of these studies have predominantly considered the mythological-ritual and political-ideological approaches as the main foundations of the cheetah motif’s evolution, and within their interpretive framework, they have frequently referred to the cheetah as a symbol of power, mastery over nature, and political authority. The present study, through an examination of case studies and their correspondence with historical written documents, has shown that the factors underlying the visual representation of the cheetah, in addition to the above interpretive models, are primarily based on functionalist-biological interpretations, in which the predatory animal was utilized by ancient humans for the purpose of fulfilling their subsistence and biological needs, aiding and facilitating the hunting process, and thus constitutes one of the most important factors in the visual representation of the cheetah.
Accordingly, since the simultaneous re-examination of archaeological evidence and technical-historical texts such as the Bazname-ye Nasavi demonstrates that the stages of capture, domestication, and training of the cheetah for hunting are rooted more in subsistence necessities and human survival than in mythological or ideological representational models, the functionalist-subsistence interpretive model is not only equivalent to the two narrative-mythological and ritual-ideological models, but also temporally and causally precedes them. In other words, before humans embodied the cheetah as a manifestation of supernatural power or political legitimacy, they had mastered it as a “hunting assistant” and employed it in their encounter with the natural world. This very mastery and essential coexistence between humans and cheetahs provided the necessary material and behavioral foundation for the formation of subsequent symbolic layers. Therefore, reducing the evolution of cheetah imagery to two interpretive models—mythological and ideological—without considering its biological-subsistence context is a limited and highly reductive reading.

The Structure of Burial Practices in the Iron Age of Mazandaran: The Case Study of Shahneh Poshte Cemetery, Babol

Hassan Fazeli Nesheli

Abstract
A series of field activities including two seasons of survey and excavation at the Shahneh Poshte cemetery of Babol on the northern slopes of the Alborz Mountains in central Mazandaran in 2018 and 2019 resulted in the discovery of a collection of human graves and burials scattered throughout this 11-hectare site. Due to the mass of destruction caused by unauthorized excavations in the cemetery, several disturbed graves were observed without any classifiable information. In contrast, by conducting scientific excavations in the 16 trenches, a total of 39 identifiable and Readable human burials were found and then the collection of information and archaeological findings related to each burial was recorded and classified. In this study, we attempt to answer questions about the existence of possible burial methods and patterns and the meaningful characteristics of these variables by studying a set of different aspects including burial practices such as the position and orientation of the body, position of face of hands, architectural structure of the graves, gender and age of skeletons, individual and group burials, and burials with and without objects. The results of absolute dating and comparative studies indicate that this cemetery belongs to a long time span from the 11th and 12th centuries BC (Iron I) to the 4th and 3rd centuries BC, i.e. the Achaemenid to the early Parthian period (Iron IV), and therefore cultural materials of this cemetery are comparable to intra-regional ancient sites in Mazandaran as well as trans-regional sites in the Gorgan Plain, the Central Plateau, and especially the Gilan region. Our research also shows that the Shahneh Poshte graves follow a specific pattern in some burial aspects including the supine position and the direction of the face to the south and therefore have long-term burial traditions.
Keywords: Shahneh Poshte Cemetery, Burial Practices, Iron Age, Mazandaran, Cultural Communications.

Introduction
The Shahneh Pashte cemetery is located adjacent to village of Kamikola and southwest of the Khoshrudpey city and 21 kilometers south of the Babol (Fig. 1) (Saedian, 2014: 321). This cemetery was excavated over two seasons in 2018 and 2019 by Hassan Fazeli Nashli. The result of these excavations was the identification of 39 human burials in situ (28 graves) (Fig. 2) which provide a set of valuable archaeological data such as absolute and relative dating, burial methods including the position and orientation of the bodies and faces, the position of the hands and the structure of graves. Based on the whole of archaeological data, the site can be dated to the late 2nd millennium B.C (late Iron I) to the mid-1st millennium B.C (Iron IV, 3rd - 4th centuries B.C / Achaemenid to early Parthian). More precisely, the absolute dating on 5 skeletons uphold this period. Based on archaeological studies between 39 burials, 29 burials belong to the late Iron I (late 2nd millennium BC) to Iron III (burials 1-11 and 22-39) are called “Iron age I - III Group” and the other 10 burials (burials 12-21) can be dated to the 4th and 3rd centuries B.C (late Achaemenid to early Parthian) that are called “Iron age IV Group”, considering the absolute dates of the two burials and their spatial relationship.

Discussion
The study of the Shahneh Poshte burials shows that a set of methods were used to place the deceased in grave which are divided into two general categories: lying on the sides and supine. These two general modes include a total of 11 sub-modes. In general, in the entire Iron Age in this site (I-IV), the lying on the sides includes 13 burials (33.3%) including 4 burials on the right and 9 burials on the left, supine 15 burials (38.5%) and also 11 burials (28.2%) lack any recognizable signs. In more detail, during the Iron I-III period, there were 8 contracted burials (28% of total) of which 4 were on the right and 4 on the left. In addition, 12 burials (41% of total) were buried in supine. Also, 9 burials (31% of total) were of unknown status. In the Iron IV, there were 5 contracted burials (50% of total) all of which were on the left and no right-sided burials were found. Moreover, 3 burials (30% of total) were buried in supine. Finally, 2 burials (20% of period) were classified as undetermined burials due to extensive damages (Fig. 3-5). Regarding the position of the hands of the skeletons, during the Iron I-IV, a total of 16 positions were observed which can be classified into three general groups: lying on the sides, supine and unknown. In addition, the first group includes 6 subgroups (25% of all), the second group is divided into 9 subgroups (54% of all) and the third group is divided into 9 cases (21% of all) as unknown (Fig. 6-7). In Shahneh Poshte, three types of grave architecture have been identified. The first is a simple pit, second is a simple pit with a clay cover and the third is a pithos. Of the 28 graves in site, 26 graves (93% of all) are simple oval pits, of which 20 graves belong to the Iron I-III (71.6%) and 6 graves (21.4%) belong to the Iron IV. The second method, a simple pit covered with big clay fragments includes only 1 is from Iron Age I-III (3.5% of total). Also the pithos burial consists of only 1 grave (3.5% of total) from Iron Age IV (Fig. 8-10). In terms of gender and age of the deceased in this cemetery, total of 9 burials (23% of all) were identified as male, including 8 burials (27.6%) in Iron I-III and 1 burial (10%) in Iron IV. In addition, there were 14 burials (36% of total) as female including 12 burials (27.6%) in Iron I-III and 2 burials (20%) in Iron IV. Also, of the total burials, 16 burials (41% of total) were disturbed (Fig. 11-17). In addition, 7 different positions of the bodies were identified in relation to geographical directions including: south-north 5% of all, east-west 2.5%, west-east 23%, northeast-southwest 10.5% of all, southwest-northeast 10.5%, southeast-northwest 10.5%, northwest-southeast 15% and also an unknown direction 23% of all burials (Fig. 18-19). It is worth noting that for the orientation of face, during all periods, the dominant method was the south direction with a total of 23% of all burials, and especially 20.5% of all in Iron I-III, it was certainly the most common burial method. It seems that this method was not a priority in the Iron IV and was used less often. After that, the north direction was the most common method with 15.3% including 10.2% in Iron IV and 5.1% in Iron I-III (Fig. 20-21). Regarding other study characteristics, 67.8% of the total graves are individual and 32.2% are group graves. Among the first group, 53.5% of the total is related to Iron I-III and 14.6% are related to Iron IV. In addition, group graves comprise 32.2% of the total graves of which 621.5% are related to Iron I-III and 310.5% are related to Iron IV (Fig. 22-25). Finally, about the possession of objects, in total, 70% of all burials were buried with burial objects and 30% did not contain any goods (Fig. 26-27). Finally, regarding the amount of possession of objects, in total, 27 burials (70% of all) were buried with burial objects, and only 12 burials (30% of total) did not contain any burial objects or grave goods.

Discussion
Human skeletons in Shahneh Poshte cemetery are mostly buried in individual and group graves, including 28 graves which mostly include simple pits, one case of a simple pit with a clay cover and one pithos. In fact, the architectural of the graves was mostly in form of simple pits. A simple pit grave with a clay cover is quite unique in this site and a similar the grave has apparently been found only in one grave in the Lefork cemetery of Savadkuh which has been dated to Iron Age III (Abedini, 2017: 154). Third group of tombs is pithos type that has many similar older and contemporary examples in Mazandaran county. Among the numerous similar examples in the Iron Age of Mazandaran, can mention the children’s tombs in Gohar Tepe (Piller and Mahfroozi, 2009: 19) and cemetery Amirkola in Savadkuh (Abedini, 2017: 154), as well as Qaleh Kuti I cemetery (Fukai and Ikeda, 1971: Pl. XIX, Fig. 2) and Kaluraz in Gilan (Fahimi, 2002: 106-107), Tepe Gyan (Contenau and Girshman, 1935: 12), Maral Tepe of Uzbeki (Majidzadeh, 2008: 135-136) and Dinkhah Tepe (Muscaerella, 1974: 75). In addition, this method reached its peak of use during the Parthian period such as Taq bustan in Kermanshah (Kambakh Fard, 1998: 45), Liarsang-Ben cemetery in Gilan (Jahani et al., 2023: 38; Jahani et al., 2018: 114), and especially in the central Zagros basin (Mohammadi Far and Hojabari Nobari, 2004) such as Sanandaj (Khosravi et al., 2018: 317), Marivan (Mohammadi Far and Sarraf, 2006; Masoumian and Rahimi-Galugahi, 2012: 428) and several points in the city of Hamadan and its surrounding areas (Azarnoush, 1975: 56, vol. 7; Dailer et al., 2013). The graves of Shahneh Poshte are scattered in different parts of the cemetery and it does not seem that a specific space of the cemetery was dedicated to a specific group or class of people in this society. The group graves are in the form of two-burial and three-burial graves with a slight difference in depth and space compared to each other, although the attribution of some of these group burials to each other has been ambiguous. However, the spatial proximity of the skeletons and their burial objects and the difficulty in distinguishing them from each other led to the attribution of some of them to a single grave and it seems that even despite a slight difference in depth, there was a clear awareness in creating a single grave for multiple skeletons. Usually, the deceased were placed in the grave in various positions, either contracted (lying on their sides) or supine with different positions inclined to the right or left. The positions of the hands are usually in front of the chest and face and sometimes in line with the body and the legs are also bent in three different degrees: less than a 90-degree angle (high, inclined inward towards the abdomen and spine: grade 1), 90-degree angle (medium, perpendicular angle to the spine: grade 2), and more than 90-degree angle (low, open angle to the spine: grade 3). A few are also supine and extended in line with the body.

Conclusion
The study of the burials of the Shahneh Poshte cemetery shows that there were a group of methods and rituals related to the burial of the dead, some of which were used more than others and, in other words, became a burial tradition. Regarding the position of the dead during the Iron Age and during the use of this cemetery, all the conventional methods of placing the deceased in the grave were used in the Shahneh Poshte area and despite the slightly higher number of supine method, it does not have a significant advantage over the lying on sides method and both methods can be seen as burial methods and traditions in great abundance. Also, the supine method was the most common burial method among women with 71% and men did not have any dominant method. In the discussion of the architectural structure of the tomb, the common tradition and method, the usual method is a simple oval pit but there are two unique methods, one is a simple pit grave covered with pottery fragments and the other is a pithos burial, each of which was used in the form of a grave only as a specific method, not a burial tradition. Finally, based on the set of burial characteristics of the Shahneh Poshte cemetery, it can be seen that this site is comparable in many aspects to sites within the region in Mazandaran and adjacent the region especially Gilan and the Central Plateau. It can also be considered that the set of burial methods and traditions of the Shahneh Poshte cemetery is homogeneous and identical to other contemporary sites in Mazandaran and to some extent a continuation of some pre-Iron Age burial methods in this region.

Predictive Modelling of Iron Age Sites: A Case Study of the Eastern Kurdistan Region, Iran

Ardashir Javanmardzadeh

Abstract
Predictive models are a component of GIS-based statistical approaches, which hold an important place in archaeological research due to advances in relevant theories and tools. Predictive models, developed through the statistical processing and analysis of environmental variables that influence site location, aid in understanding the cultural and natural landscape of the study area and contribute to the development of plans for improved cultural heritage management. This article, employing a statistical-analytical approach and data from archaeological surveys, aims to present a predictive model for a part of the eastern Kurdistan region where archaeological surveys have not yet been conducted. Prediction modelling was performed using the MaxEnt machine learning method, with eleven factors as natural variables and presence data (areas) required for modelling. The model area was divided into two experimental sections (Bijar and Dehgolan) and a prediction area (Qorveh), as the prediction model for Qorveh city was based on the natural variables and presence data from Bijar and Dehgolan cities. Finally, the prediction map was divided into four classes: very high, high, medium, and low suitability areas. The very high suitability area, which comprises 10% of the total model area, contains 59% of the Iron Age sites in eastern Kurdistan. It was found that vegetation cover, land use, and distance from rivers were among the most influential factors in the model. Also, the initial data in Qorveh indicate that 62% of the sites are located in an area comprising 8% with very high desirability, supporting the accuracy of the prediction. The AUC statistic is 0.836, and the finding value for the model has been calculated as 0.82, which indicates a prediction model with an approach value close to 1.
Keywords: Archaeological Prediction Model, GIS, MaxEnt, Eastern Kurdistan, Iron Age.

Introduction
The use of GIS and statistical modelling to map possible locations of archaeological sites has increased over the past decades. (Stefan & Sîrbu, 2010; Niknami et al., 2007; Alirezaei et al., 2019). Currently, archaeological prediction models are a powerful tool for preventing natural and human damage to historical and cultural resources (Danese et al., 2014), and for increasing the efficiency of archaeological field activities and cultural heritage management (Howard et al., 2016; Balla et al., 2014). Statistical modelling, as a perspective for identifying suitable areas for selecting prehistoric settlements, has been widely used by geographers and archaeologists (Sharafi et al., 2016; Verhagen & Dragut, 2012; Kaimaris, 2018). This method can be effectively considered a form of archaeological exploration. This paper aims to develop a concept for creating a prediction model using the MaxEnt method in the Eastern part of Kurdistan, to evaluate similar studies in archaeology, and to determine settings and suggest ways to optimise such approaches. Simultaneously, using a statistical approach based on GIS, the prediction model, and archaeological survey data from the eastern part of Kurdistan, it identifies the most favourable locations for the formation of Iron Age settlements. Accordingly, using environmental and archaeological data from Bijar and Dehgolan counties, a prediction model for Qorveh county has been developed using the MaxEnt method. Due to the lack of access to archaeological data for Qorveh County, the study area has been divided into two sections: experimental and prediction. This approach allows for predictions in the Qorveh region based on data from the experimental area (Bijar and Dehgolan counties), despite the absence of the required data. This method can thus be proposed as a study approach, with related recommendations, for another similar research.
Research Method: This research employed field and library (descriptive-analytical) methods, utilising the Geographic Information System (GIS) for the preparation and interpretation of GIS maps to analyse the settlement habitats of 96 Iron Age sites in eastern Kurdistan (Bijar, Qorveh, Dehgolan). The MaxEnt model was used to predict the distribution of Iron Age sites in eastern Kurdistan.

Data
The present study used a digital elevation model with a spatial resolution of 28 metres. Any change in these data will result in changes in climate, livelihoods, and other factors (Khosrowzadeh & Habibi, 2015: 109). The digital elevation model is used to extract new information such as slope, slope direction, and land curvature. This information is relatively common and significant, and is generally used in predictive models in archaeology. Land curvature data have also been used, which are defined as the rate of slope change (Whitworth, 2011: 469). The prediction model in this paper will be implemented using the principle of maximum entropy (MaxEnt). Such predictive modelling in archaeology requires two types of input data: environmental data (environmental variables that have a direct or indirect effect on the location of historical sites based on archaeological studies) and data related to archaeological sites, also known as presence data. The study area covers the political geography of Bijar, Qorveh, and Dehgolan counties. This study aims to make the most accurate prediction of Iron Age archaeological sites in Qorveh county using presence data (sites) from surrounding areas such as Bijar and Dehgolan counties. Given the similar climate and landscape in the eastern part of Iranian Kurdistan, the prediction of site formation locations in Qorveh County will be presented based on the MaxEnt prediction model.

Discussion
The final result of the prediction model for the eastern part of Kurdistan was based on the frequency ratio (FR) of the land cover and land use variables, which were among the most influential factors in the model. Their impact coefficients were estimated to be 24.3 and 32.6, respectively. Based on the classification of the forecast map, the low-desirability region covers the largest area within the forecast range, comprising 72% of the total. In contrast, better results can be observed due to the reduction in the area of regions in the high-desirability group. These regions, categorised as very high and high-desirability groups, comprise 10.5 percent and 7.5 percent of the total area, respectively. In contrast, it includes the largest number of areas, accounting for 89 percent of the total. These areas comprise 57 and 29 areas, respectively. While the areas with the highest potential are highlighted, they significantly reduce the area available for archaeological investigation.

Conclusion
MaxEnt modelling requires the use of presence data (areas). For this purpose, the prediction model is defined to include two categories of areas. First, the experimental area contains presence data (areas) as well as environmental factors and variables to configure the prediction model. Second: Prediction area; this section and perspective include the city of Qorveh in the eastern part of Kurdistan. The experimental area for this modelling contains 96 presence data points (areas) with an Iron Age chronology. Of these, 25% were used as test data and 75% as training data. Modelling with the MaxEnt method identifies the most influential variables by examining each one. Factors such as vegetation cover, land use, distance from the village, and distance from water sources are among the most influential variables on the model results. In this case, MaxEnt statistical analysis of other variables is also presented. Examination of the altitude variable shows that it has the greatest impact on sites within the altitude range of 1378–1400. The greatest impact of rivers on the sites occurred at a distance of 1000 metres. From 1000 to 3000 metres, the impact was least, but from 3000 to 5000 metres, the influence on site location became significant again. It has been found that at a distance of 2000 metres from villages, the likelihood of site formation is greater than at greater distances. The prediction map is divided into four groups based on the specified threshold value mentioned earlier: very high, high, medium, and low suitability areas. According to this division, the very high suitability area covers 10.5% of the total model area, and 59% of the sites (occurrence data) are located within this area. The high, medium, and low suitability areas include 30%, 6.5%, and 4.5% of the sites within these areas, respectively. Given that the very high and low suitability prediction areas are small but contain the largest percentage of sites, the model can be considered predictive.

Causal Marriages; Racial Mixing and Cultural Mixing in the Median and Achaemenid Eras

Hamid Kavyani Pooya

Abstract
Throughout history, interactions between societies have led to the evolution of cultures, with political systems and ruling powers playing a significant and effective role in this process of cultural amalgamation. A key focus of this research is to examine the dominant culture of the Median and Achaemenid societies and the mutual influences between Iranian culture and the non-Iranian cultures present within these states’ territories. In other words, this study aims to explore the causes and factors behind cultural collisions from the seventh to the fourth centuries BCE, the policies pursued by governments regarding the cultures and nations under their control or neighboring them, and the outcomes of the interactions between various cultures and Iranian civilization for both Iranians and non-Iranian communities. Based on these ambiguities and through an examination of available sources and evidence, along with references to historical texts, the results indicate that, in addition to Iran’s geographic position, which welcomed various tribes with diverse cultures, the coexistence of these groups inevitably influenced Iranian society. What accelerated and enhanced the amalgamation and integration of cultures within Iranian society was the presence of a common enemy, particularly threatening powers in the region, which united these tribes. The capabilities and potential of the Median and Achaemenid political systems, which had trans-regional objectives, played a crucial role in the connection and amalgamation of the existing cultures within Achaemenid territory. The Achaemenids aimed to attract non-Iranian forces and establish political dependency through political marriages and social ties, facilitating the cultural integration of subordinate tribes. This policy aimed to prevent separation and regional turmoil while expanding the cultural domain of the Achaemenids by absorbing and assimilating effective elements from various cultures into Iranian culture.
Keywords: Cultural Fusion, Ancient Iran, Media, Achaemenid, Political Marriage.

Introduction
In the evolutionary course of societies, and amidst the presence of significant trans regional powers with rich cultural heritage, one of the principal issues is to determine the nature of the cultural condition of Iranian society during the Median and, particularly, the Achaemenid eras. In this period, diverse cultures—from those along the Syr Darya (Sihun) to western Asia Minor and the shores of the Aegean Sea—were integrated into a unified political culture. The key question is whether this diversity and cultural plurality gave rise to a heterogeneous and unbalanced society in which no dominant role can be ascribed to Iranian culture, or whether we are confronted with a balanced synthesis of existing cultural elements, wherein a equilibrium was established—through cultural intermingling and fusion—between the distinctions and commonalities of Iranian and non-Iranian cultural facets.
Furthermore, an examination of the consequences of marital alliances that occurred between various ethnic groups and power holders both within and beyond the borders of Iran—as reflected in historical reports—and, more importantly, the occurrence of political marriages between Iranian governments and non-Iranian states, constitutes a highly significant topic. In this research, these issues will be discussed and analyzed in order to ascertain, independently of their varied political, economic, and security implications, the share and impact that such unions had on the culture of ancient Iranian society during the Median and Achaemenid periods. Additionally, the study will assess the extent to which the aforementioned governments succeeded in advancing their political objectives through recourse to this policy and what changes and transformations they effected in the cultural fabric of the region.
The research methodology employed in this article is based on a descriptive-analytical approach. The author has collected data through a critical examination of available sources and evidence, including primary historical texts (such as ancient historical accounts) and significant recent scholarship. This method relies on citation from library-based and primary sources, proceeding with a precise description of the data followed by their analysis to address the raised ambiguities. Specifically, the research focuses on investigating the causes and factors of cultural encounters, the policies of the Median and Achaemenid governments toward various ethnic groups and nations, and the outcomes of cultural interactions. This qualitative approach utilizes historical and cultural tools to analyze causal connections and cultural fusion, without reliance on quantitative or empirical methods.
This study holds considerable importance as it examines the role of cultural and political interactions in the evolution of ancient Iranian societies, particularly during the Median and Achaemenid eras (seventh to fourth centuries BCE). Its necessity arises from existing ambiguities in understanding the prevailing culture in Iranian society, where the cultural diversity of various ethnic groups (both Iranian and non-Iranian) within the vast Achaemenid realm may have produced a heterogeneous society. However, the research demonstrates that policies such as political marriages contributed to the creation of balance and cultural integration. The significance of this study lies in its exploration of the consequences of these connections on culture, politics, economy, and security, which not only aids in comprehending Iranian identity but also illustrates the role of ruling powers in synthesizing cultures to prevent unrest and extend cultural dominance. In the contemporary world, this research is essential as it offers models of cultural coexistence and diversity management that can serve as inspiration for modern societies, particularly in regions with high ethnic and cultural diversity. Moreover, given the geographical position of the Iranian Plateau as a crossroads of cultures, this study helps fill historical gaps concerning the influence of common adversaries and transregional objectives on cultural fusion.

Discussion
As ancient documents and evidence attest, in antiquity and on the Iranian Plateau, in most cases foreign inhabitants lived alongside the indigenous population. They established commercial relations with one another; marriages occurred between men and women of different nationalities; and at times individuals converted from one religion to another. There were even periods in which people worshipped both their own gods and those of foreigners simultaneously. It also happened that an individual would change his or her name and adopt one from another land, or, in addition to a personal name, take on the name of the people among whom he or she resided (Dandamayev, 1366 [1987]: 60). Through these developments—and particularly through the gradual penetration of the Iranian element into the western regions of Iran—it appears that a relatively new culture became prevalent in this area: a culture that was not purely Iranian, but rather a composite culture formed through the amalgamation of migrant and local elements.
In addition to inheriting the cultural legacy and achievements of the Medes, the Persians engaged in substantial borrowing from the indigenous cultures of the region, especially that of the Elamites, who possessed a state tradition spanning several millennia. More than the Medes, the Persians served as transmitters of the culture established in the southwestern Iranian Plateau—and even of Mesopotamian culture—into the heart of the plateau and the Achaemenid Empire. On the basis of personal names, prevailing religious beliefs, and even existing religious sites in various regions, one can trace the extent of Iranian culture in non-Iranian areas and among non-Iranian peoples. At the outset, however, it must be noted that on the Iranian Plateau, despite the formation of an empire, the custom of political marriages among families and tribes remained firmly in place; as observed, in certain regions—particularly in Fars and Elam—relations and exchanges date back to the period prior to Cyrus’s conquests. For example, in Babylon, from the first quarter of the sixth century BCE, Babylonians bore Iranian names.
The influence and predominance of Iranian culture—along with cultural syncretism resulting from relations between Iranian and non-Iranian peoples—led, during the Achaemenid period, to the adoption of Iranian names by non-Iranians, in addition to those who possessed such names due to mixed ancestry. With the expansion of Median influence, and subsequently that of the Achaemenids, into Asia Minor, these powers encountered an important and advanced civilization such as Lydia, which dominated the Ionian city-states and whose culture had profoundly influenced many Greek polities. Cultural confrontation between Iranians and Greeks, and the cultural impact of the Achaemenid state on the Ionian city-states, was evident from the very beginning of Persian presence in Asia Minor. This cultural intermixture intensified further with the Achaemenid domination of Asia Minor and the conquest of the Ionian islands and city-states. Indeed, one of the reasons for cultural—and even ethnic—convergence between Iranians and Greeks in certain regions was their coexistence. Among the primary causes of this coexistence were the relocation of Ionian populations to parts of Asia Minor and the settlement of Iranian populations in various areas of the same region.
By forging alliances and political marriages between Persians and other peoples and powers, the Achaemenids sought to “Achaemenidize” their domains through the integration of Iranian and non-Iranian cultures and the internalization of Persian culture among non-Iranians. They devoted considerable effort to aligning the interests of allies and affiliates with those of the Achaemenid state. Throughout the Achaemenid period, the expansion of imperial influence, the settlement of Iranians in non-Iranian regions (diaspora), and their presence in subject territories accelerated the process of acculturation.

Conclusion
One of the methods employed to integrate and bring together diverse peoples under a comprehensive culture was the creation of bonds and marital alliances among the people’s subject to the Median and Achaemenid states. Political marriage, as a socio-political phenomenon, was practiced throughout Iranian history with predetermined objectives aimed at consolidating social, political, military, economic, cultural, and religious relations among governments and groups. Rulers and governments consistently resorted to various strategies to ensure the continuation of their political existence, and one of the most effective means of achieving political—and even cultural—cohesion and unity was the establishment of bonds among different members of society through intra- and inter-dynastic marriages.
Accordingly, the Achaemenids’ objective in creating such ties and consenting to political marriages was to attract non-Iranian forces, draw them closer to the seat of power, bind them to the political system of the state, and, in other words, achieve the cultural integration of subject peoples and nations. Through cultural amalgamation and convergence—realized in religious beliefs and through marital alliances among peoples and individuals—the Achaemenids sought to ensure that non-Iranian groups would not regard them as outsiders. In addition to preventing separatism and regional unrest, the establishment of a dominant culture allowed the Achaemenid cultural sphere to extend far beyond its political borders, thereby facilitating the acceptance of imperial authority.
Drawing upon the inherent potential of Iranian culture, one of the Achaemenids’ notable initiatives was the selective adoption of significant, effective, and appealing elements from the cultures of subject peoples, their absorption and assimilation into Iranian culture, and their reticulation within a new cultural framework in which Iranian identity and elements held clear predominance.

Technical Analysis and Stability Measures in Vaulted Structures of Khuzestan from Elamite to Late Sasanian Periods

Shahriar Nasekhian

Abstract
Khuzestan, a primary center of mudbrick and fired-brick architecture in ancient Iran, witnessed the evolution of vaulted construction from the Elamite to the Late Sasanian periods. Among these, arched vaults served not only as structural elements but also as a demonstration of systematic engineering practices tailored to the region’s warm and semi-humid climate. Despite the abundance of surviving monuments, no comprehensive study has analyzed their technical and structural features to uncover the underlying stability principles. This study aims to examine the structural performance and recurring patterns of stability in arched vaults of Khuzestan. Field surveys, documentation of accessible structures, analysis of 111 identified vaulted buildings, and detailed examination of 21 selected representative examples were conducted. The study focused on the interaction of materials, geometric proportions, construction technology, and human craftsmanship in achieving long-term stability. Results indicate that vault stability depended on: 1) the type and geometry of bricks, consistent mortar thickness, and interlocking strategies; 2) diverse construction techniques, including corbeling, radial arrangements, and combination methods; 3) geometric proportions such as span, rise, and vault thickness; 4) adaptation to climatic conditions; and 5) the skill and experience of the builders. This research highlights the presence of a systematic engineering logic in pre-Islamic vault construction and provides a framework for restoration, conservation, and potential adaptation in contemporary architectural practice. The findings demonstrate that these vaults were not merely empirical or accidental in design but reflect deliberate, replicable, and coherent structural strategies.
Keywords: Structural Stability, Vaulted Architecture, Arched Vaults, Pre-Islamic Iran, Khuzestan.

Introduction
Khuzestan has historically played a pivotal role in the development of vaulted architecture within ancient Iranian civilizations. Vaults represent one of the most sophisticated elements of traditional construction, combining technical mastery, material understanding, and adaptation to environmental conditions. From the Elamite through Late Sasanian periods, vaulted buildings in Khuzestan reveal an evolution in construction techniques, reflecting the accumulation of knowledge and local innovation. Arched vaults, in particular, served as primary structural and functional components in ritual, funerary, administrative, and sometimes military architecture.
The study of these vaults provides insight into the strategies employed by ancient builders to achieve stability over centuries. Stability in traditional architecture encompasses not only physical durability but also cultural, climatic, and technical resilience. Builders utilized local materials, precise geometric proportions, and structured load distribution to respond to environmental and functional challenges. Despite extensive archaeological documentation, there has been limited focus on the technical principles underpinning vault stability, particularly in arched vaults.
This research addresses this gap by systematically analyzing recurring structural features, material properties, construction technology, and geometric patterns that contributed to vault durability. The study examines both historical continuity and the adaptation of techniques over time, demonstrating that pre-Islamic vaulting practices in Khuzestan were informed by deliberate engineering logic rather than trial-and-error. Understanding these principles is critical for bridging knowledge gaps in architectural conservation, informing restoration efforts, and inspiring contemporary applications of traditional construction methods.

Discussion
Analysis of arched vaults in Khuzestan indicates that their long-term stability resulted from a combination of material selection, construction technology, geometric design, and human skill. Key aspects include:
Materials and Mortar: Builders employed trapezoidal, square, and rectangular bricks, wider and thicker at structural bases to distribute loads effectively. Mortars, including clay, gypsum, and bitumen, were chosen according to moisture conditions, ensuring cohesion and stability.
Construction Techniques: Techniques included inclined corbeling, radial arrangements, and hybrid approaches. Temporary wooden or reed supports facilitated precise execution, while multi-layer vaults with controlled thickness enhanced overall strength. Adjacent vaults were often coordinated to reduce lateral stresses.
Geometric Proportions: Ratios between span, rise, and thickness were carefully maintained across periods. Numerical proportional systems guided vault dimensions, while precise interlocking of bricks ensured efficient load transfer.
Human Skill: Mastery in aligning bricks, controlling mortar thickness, integrating vaults with walls, and designing stress-relief features such as recesses and buttresses reflected high craftsmanship.
The historical evolution from Elamite to Sasanian periods shows gradual refinement. Early Elamite vaults utilized simple rectangular cross-sections and limited brick types, while Late Sasanian vaults displayed sophisticated high-rise arches, modular brick use, and multi-layer arrangements. These developments indicate a cumulative knowledge system that informed construction practices and responded to functional and climatic challenges.
The study highlights that stability was never accidental; rather, it emerged from repeated, rationalized engineering practices. Such findings provide an empirical basis for restoration and reconstruction, enabling the preservation of architectural integrity and informing contemporary design strategies that draw upon historical methods.

Conclusion
This research demonstrates that arched vaults in Khuzestan were underpinned by systematic engineering principles rather than empirical trial-and-error. Stability resulted from the integrated interaction of materials, construction technology, geometric design, environmental adaptation, and craftsmanship. The study identifies:
- Strategic use of brick types and mortar selection to optimize structural cohesion.
- Refined construction techniques, including corbeling, radial arrangements, multi-layer vaulting, and controlled thickness.
- Geometric proportionality ensuring balanced distribution of forces.
- Adaptation to climate and environmental constraints.
- High-level craftsmanship in aligning elements and controlling structural behavior.
Historical analysis reveals a continuous technological development, culminating in Late Sasanian vaults that exemplify peak structural refinement. Documenting these features provides a foundation for preservation, restoration, and potential adaptation in modern architectural practice. Future studies may compare these vaults with contemporary structures in neighboring regions or explore the influence on early Islamic architecture in southwestern Iran.
The study confirms that pre-Islamic vault construction in Khuzestan represents a coherent, replicable, and sophisticated engineering tradition, offering valuable lessons for both conservation and contemporary design.

Relations between Persia and Egypt during the Reign of Darius I: Interactions and Cultural Policies

Sahmeddin Khazaei

Abstract

This research examines the cultural relations between Iran and Egypt during the reign of Darius the Great (521-486 BC). Cambyses’ conquest of Egypt before Darius’s reign transformed the land into a significant satrapy of the Achaemenid Empire; however, internal unrest early in Darius’s rule presented challenges to the region’s stability. The central research question is to identify and analyze the nature of cultural interactions and policies in the relations between Iran and Egypt during this historical period. The research aims to provide a more detailed description of these relations, focusing on artistic, commercial, and religious exchanges, as well as to examine the impact of Achaemenid cultural policies on Egyptian culture. This study seeks to offer a more comprehensive picture of the civilizational interactions between the two great civilizations of that time and a better understanding of the Achaemenid Empire’s influence and power. The main question is: What were the cultural policies of Darius I and his interactions with Egypt? The research hypothesis is that Darius’s cultural policies led to dynamic interactions and significant cultural exchanges with Iran. This research employs a descriptive-analytical method using historical sources and available documents. The results indicate that, in addition to political and economic exchanges, there were significant cultural interactions between Iran and Egypt. Darius, with a clever and respectful approach, sought to maintain authority while also gaining the satisfaction of the Egyptian people. These policies included respecting Egyptian sacred sites, developing local laws in collaboration with elites, and reviving the medical school of Sais.

Keywords: Achaemenid Empire, Darius I, Egypt, Cultural Relations, Religious Policies.

Introduction
Cultural relations among great civilizations throughout history have always been a rich source for understanding social, political, and economic developments. The Achaemenid period, marked by the expansion of its vast empire, witnessed extensive interactions among various peoples and civilizations. Egypt, with its ancient civilization and abundant treasures, held significant importance for the Achaemenid, both strategically and economically. Egypt was conquered during the reign of Cambyses, son of Cyrus the Great, and became one of the essential satrapies of this empire. The era of Darius the Great, with systematic measures and a commitment to preserving and expanding the empire, initiated a new chapter in the relations between Persia and Egypt. During this time, various cultural, political, and economic interactions took shape between the two civilizations, the evidence of which is evident in historical sources and archaeological findings. Investigating these relations provides a valuable opportunity for a deeper understanding of the influence and reach of the Achaemenid Empire, as well as a better comprehension of the complexities of cultural interactions during that era. This research focuses on the period of Darius I, examining the cultural relations between Persia and Egypt and seeking to explore the nature of the interactions and cultural policies governing these relations.
The main objective of this research is to analyze and investigate the cultural relations between Persia and Egypt during the reign of Darius I. This research is conducted with the aim of identifying and describing more accurately the interactions and cultural policies in this historical period. A better understanding of the extent of influence and power of the Achaemenid Empire, as well as providing a more comprehensive picture of the cultural interactions between the two great civilizations of that era, are considered necessities of this research. Furthermore, examining these cultural relations can contribute to a deeper understanding of how the Achaemenid Empire was formed and sustained, and its impact on neighboring civilizations. The findings of this research can provide new directions for future studies in the history of relations between Persia and Egypt, as well as the history of the Achaemenid Empire.
Research Questions and Hypothesis: The fundamental question of this research is: in the realm of cultural relations between Persia and Egypt, what were the interactions and cultural policies of Darius I in Egypt like? The hypothesis is that Darius I’s cultural policies in Egypt led to the formation of dynamic interactions and significant cultural exchanges with Persia.
Research Methodology: To answer these questions, a descriptive-analytical method has been employed, relying on written sources such as inscriptions, historical documents, and texts, as well as archaeological findings like architectural works, pottery, and art objects, which will be examined in this study.
Research Background
The existing literature indicates that cultural relations between Persia and Egypt during the Achaemenid period, particularly under Darius the Great, have attracted scholarly attention examining various dimensions of these interactions, but their treatment remained brief and generalized. Therefore, this study builds upon existing sources and archaeological evidence to develop a deeper understanding of cultural interactions between these civilizations. Focusing on cultural aspects and mutual influences, it aims to provide a more precise analysis of Persian-Egyptian cultural relations during Darius I’s reign, including the Achaemenid central government’s role in managing these cross-cultural engagements.

Discussion
Darius I’s rule over Egypt was characterized by a combination of military control and diplomatic cultural policies. After crushing the Egyptian revolt led by Petoubastis III, Darius aimed to stabilize the region through a variety of strategies. One notable policy was the reverence towards Egyptian religious traditions, exemplified by his ongoing support for the worship of Apis, which helped quell unrest and foster local loyalty. This respect for religious customs was part of a broader diplomatic effort to integrate Egypt’s cultural identity into the empire’s framework.
Archaeological findings indicate Darius’s infrastructural initiatives, including the restoration of the Suez Canal, originally developed during earlier dynasties. This project signified an emphasis on trade and communication, fostering economic and cultural exchanges between Persia and Egypt. The canal’s reopening played a crucial role in facilitating the movement of goods, artisans, and ideas, ultimately enriching both civilizations.
In addition to infrastructure, Darius’s policies reportedly included local legal regulations tuned to Egyptian norms, as well as the revival of Egyptian educational and medical institutions, notably the School of Sais. These measures not only maintained stability but also encouraged cultural exchanges, leading to a flourishing of art, religious syncretism, and administrative collaborations. Such initiatives exemplify how Darius employed a strategic blend of respect and control to manage diverse cultural identities within the empire.
The preservation and promotion of Egyptian traditions under Darius contributed to a relatively peaceful coexistence, which laid the groundwork for a shared cultural identity rooted in mutual recognition rather than suppression. Cultural exchanges during this period were further encouraged through diplomatic marriages, artistic patronage, and religious accommodations, highlighting a nuanced imperial approach that balanced authority with local tradition.

Conclusion
This research demonstrates that the interactions between Persia and Egypt during the reign of Darius the Great were not confined to simply political and economic relations. Instead, a deep cultural exchange occurred. Recognizing the significance of Egyptian civilization and its unique position in the region, Darius implemented a policy that balanced the interests of the Achaemenid Empire with the preservation and revitalization of Egyptian cultural heritage. A cornerstone of this policy was respect for Egyptian religious beliefs. Darius, through acceptance and support of Egyptian rituals, particularly the veneration of the sacred bull Apis, sought to gain the favor and loyalty of the local population. This respect for religious traditions manifested in practical actions, such as the reconstruction of temples and the revival of cultural institutions. Instead of imposing absolute power, Darius demonstrated respect for Egyptian traditions and values by involving Egyptian elites in the formulation of local laws. Darius the Great further showcased his respect for Egyptian culture and its intellectual pursuits by reviving the medical school of Sais. The reconstruction and completion of the Suez Canal played a crucial role in boosting trade and communication between Persia and Egypt, fostering economic advancement in both nations. These actions demonstrate Darius’s understanding and appreciation of Egypt’s cultural and historical significance, as well as the interconnectedness of the two realms. This approach to governance, while serving the interests of the Achaemenid, fostered stability and peace in Egypt. These cultural interactions left a lasting impact on the relationship between the two civilizations, reflecting a profound understanding of the value of cultural diversity and the necessity of respecting established traditions. These policies, transcending a purely political strategy, contributed to the continuity and flourishing of Egyptian culture and regional stability. In short, the research suggests that Darius, with a profound understanding of cultural complexities, adopted a reciprocal and respectful approach towards Egyptian traditions.

The Evolution of Horse Covers (Jul) in Mesopotamia and Iran: An Analysis of Structure, Design, and Motifs from the Assyrian Period to the End of the Achaemenid Era

Davood Shadlou

Abstract
The horse held a prominent role in the culture of Iran and Mesopotamia, both from mythological and practical perspectives. The aesthetic treatment of horse equipment, beyond its functional aspect, was an expression of reverence for both the horse and its rider. This study aims to identify and analyze the structure, design, and motifs of horse covers (Jul) in Iran and Mesopotamia during the period from 1906 to 330 BCE. The main research question investigates the distinctive structural and decorative characteristics of horse covers in this era. The necessity of this research arises from the fact that, despite the significance of the horse and its equipment in ancient civilizations, the aesthetic and structural aspects of ancient horse covers have rarely been examined in previous studies. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the study is based on qualitative analysis of documentary data and archaeological evidence. The data were collected through systematic note-taking, and the statistical population includes all available examples- textile fragments, visual representations, and archaeological findings- through which the structure and design of the horse covers of this period can be identified and analyzed. The findings indicate that horse covers in Mesopotamia and Iran evolved from simple, utilitarian forms in the Assyrian period to more complex and decorative types during the Elamite, Median, and Achaemenid periods. Throughout this evolution, their structure developed in terms of size and composition, progressing from small, undecorated examples to large-scale pieces featuring organized and symmetrical animal and vegetal motifs. Beyond their decorative role, these motifs reflected the aesthetic sensibility and cultural values of their weavers. Technically, the use of both flat-weaving and knotted-pile techniques demonstrates a synthesis of functional traditions and advanced weaving skills of the time. Overall, the stylistic and structural evolution of horse covers (Jul) represents a gradual progression in technical mastery, structural precision, and aesthetic awareness, forming the foundation for the later development of carpet weaving.
Keywords: Horse Cover (Jul), Mesopotamia, Ancient Iran, Carpet Weaving, Design and Motif.

Introduction
The domestication of the second generation of horses (DOM2) between 4500 and 3000 BCE in the Pontic–Caspian Steppe marked a turning point in human civilization. These horses, which replaced the earlier and wilder DOM1 type, played a fundamental role in transportation, warfare, and the broader social, economic, and cultural transformations of ancient societies. Their introduction to Mesopotamia, likely during the Akkadian period and more certainly under the Third Dynasty of Ur (2112–2004 BCE), led to significant advances in equestrian technologies. From the Assyrian period (1906–609 BCE) onward, the full use of horse equipment—including harnesses, chariots, saddlecloths (jul), and bridles—became widespread, granting societies with improved horse breeds military and economic superiority and fostering extensive cultural diffusion across Eurasia.
In both Iran and Mesopotamia, the horse held an important place in mythology as well as in practical life—agriculture, warfare, hunting, and transport. The aesthetic treatment and adornment of the horse, including the weaving of the Jul (saddlecloth), reflected the reverence accorded to the animal and its rider. The Jul was a functional textile placed under the saddle to absorb sweat and protect the horse’s back while also ensuring the rider’s comfort and balance. These cloths, made from materials such as wool, cotton, leather, or silk, were produced in various techniques—knotted-pile, flat-woven, jajim, or felt—and were common among nomadic groups.
Archaeological and historical evidence from 1906 to 330 BCE (corresponding to the Assyrian, Elamite, Median, and Achaemenid periods) indicates that the use of horse saddlecloths was prevalent in Iran and Mesopotamia, though little is known about their structure, design, and motifs. This study adopts a descriptive–analytical approach based on documentary research, including textual, visual, and archaeological evidence. All available samples were examined using census sampling, and the data were analyzed qualitatively. The theoretical framework combines Gordon Child’s evolutionary–historical approach with Leroi-Gourhan’s perspective, enabling analysis of both the technical development and the symbolic and cultural dimensions of horse covers (Jul) in Mesopotamia and Iran.

Discussion
Analysis of Assyrian reliefs indicates that horse saddlecloths (Juls) of this period exhibited limited structural and decorative variation, and equestrian equipment was still in the early stages of development. None of the depictions show saddles, stirrups, or securing straps, suggesting that riders sat directly on the jul with their legs hanging freely. However, the finely carved details of the horse’s headgear, including bridles and bits, demonstrate notable technical refinement in this area. Two main types of Juls can be identified: the first, simpler type—likely made of leather or felt—features two flaps and three girth straps; the second, more elaborate type, structurally resembles modern examples and was probably used for ceremonial or ritual purposes. The designs and borders of this latter group are simple yet harmonious, with recurring motifs such as the four-pealed flower, which also appears on the king’s garments, suggesting symbolic correspondence. Technically, the precise weaving method remains uncertain, though evidence points to techniques derived from traditional floor-weaving practices such as pile or flat weaving. Overall, Assyrian juls reflect a transitional stage from purely functional horse gear toward a more aesthetic and symbolic approach in equestrian equipment.
The analysis of Elamite, Median, and Achaemenid Juls (horse saddlecloths) reveals significant stylistic and structural diversity compared to Assyrian examples, owing to a broader corpus that includes rhyta, reliefs, and two surviving woven pieces. Iranian Juls display a transition from purely functional coverings to highly aesthetic and symbolic works. The Rhyta from Maku and Susa (8th–7th centuries BCE) show large, body-covering Juls adorned with animal and floral motifs—dynamic scenes of leopards, ibexes, boars, birds, and trees—arranged symmetrically or diagonally, reflecting a free, pictorial compositional system distinct from the geometric order of Assyrian designs. In the Achaemenid silver Rhyton from Erebuni (5th century BCE) and a similar woven piece identified by Franses (2019), repeated ibex motifs, symmetry, and minimalism emphasize symbolic harmony rather than narrative complexity. This visual tradition continues in the Pazyryk carpet (5th–4th centuries BCE), where 23 visible Juls share a unified geometric structure: rectangular forms with serrated or tasseled edges, linear borders, and symmetrical, abstract designs suggesting both aesthetic refinement and technical mastery. Comparable Juls appear in the Apadana reliefs at Persepolis and the Greco-Persian sarcophagus from Çan, confirming the consistency of form—rectangular bodies with serrated tassels extending to the horse’s hindquarters—across centuries and regions. Collectively, these findings indicate that Iranian Juls evolved from simple utilitarian gear into intricate, symbolically charged textiles, bridging technical innovation with a distinct artistic vocabulary rooted in ancient weaving and decorative traditions.

Conclusion
This study analyzes the structure, design, and production techniques of horse covers (Jul) from the Assyrian period to the end of the Achaemenid era (1906–330 BCE), demonstrating that in ancient Iran and Mesopotamia these textiles functioned as more than purely utilitarian objects. Over time, horse covers evolved into multilayered media for aesthetic expression, cultural identity, power relations, and technological advancement in textile production. The findings indicate that, beyond responding to technical and climatic needs, horse covers provided a platform for the manifestation of symbolic systems and visual imagination, serving as an intermediary between functional textiles and ritual carpets.
Comparative analysis of Assyrian and Iranian examples reveals that structural differences—particularly in size and extent of coverage—stem from the interaction of climate, function, and culture. Assyrian horse covers, limited mainly to the horse’s back, reflect a functional and minimalist approach, whereas the expanded coverage of Iranian examples enabled greater visual complexity and decorative development. In terms of design and motifs, the gradual transition from Assyrian geometric simplicity to the richness of Iranian animal and vegetal motifs marks the emergence of a coherent symbolic visual language, culminating in the motifs of the Pazyryk carpet.
The diversity of manufacturing techniques, including felting, leatherworking, flat weaving, and pile weaving, reflects both technical sophistication and a functional hierarchy in which pile-woven textiles held ceremonial and symbolic roles. Archaeological and visual evidence further indicates the social and political significance of horse covers, particularly during the Achaemenid period, when they became symbols of power and courtly display.
Within the theoretical framework, the findings align with Gordon Child’s evolutionary–historical approach and Leroi-Gourhan’s theory of the relationship between technique, body, and symbolic expression, positioning the horse cover as a liminal object between function, technology, and meaning. The study thus highlights the enduring role of horse covers in shaping ancient textile traditions and the visual culture of Iran.

The Study of Islamic-Era Settlements in Abbar and Darram, Tarrom Olya County based on Archaeological Evidence and Historical Texts

Farzad Mafi

Abstract
The county of Tarrom Olya is located in the northern part of Zanjan province, for reasons such as having a diverse climate, and its special location, in the middle of the provinces of Zanjan, Gialen, Ardabil and Qazvin is potentially important from the point of view of archeology. However, the field and library research’s done in relation to this area has not been as satisfactory in comparison with its size and importance. In this article, for the first time, the settlements of the Islamic era in Abbar and Darram of Tarrom Olya county have been examined and studied based on archaeological documents and historical texts. For this purpose, the 1400 years of the Islamic era have been divided into three periods, including the first centuries, the middle centuries and the late centuries of the Islamic period, and have been studied and examined both in terms of historical texts and archaeological materials. As a result, 25 sites, historical hills, cemeteries and buildings related to the Islamic period, which were identified in the field survey of Abbar and Drram regions, have been categorized into one of the three mentioned sections based on pottery level and analyzed. The purpose of this research is to answer some questions about the quantity and quality of Islamic settlements in the region, tracing Islamic settlements or buildings of the region in historical texts and identifying the key Islamic sites in the study area. The result of this study indicates that a significant number of the Islamic sites identified in the studied area were dynamic settlements in the first and middle centuries of the Islamic era. Based on the data obtained from the survey, including the size of the sites, it seems that some Islamic settlements in the region, including the site known as Drram Castle, were an important central settlement in the Tarrom Olya county during the Islamic era. The result of this research shows that despite the importance of communication in the region, the ancient sites of the Islamic era in the studied area, in general, have a small size and remain almost as rural settlements.
Keywords: Tarrom Olya, Abbar, Darram, Islamic Era, The Northern basin of Qezel-Uzan.

Introduction
Despite the location of the Tarrom region between the well-known cities of Zanjan, Ardabil, Qazvin, and Rasht, it has received less attention in historical texts compared to the aforementioned regions. The aim of this study, based on a field survey, is to investigate the identification, quality, and quantity of Islamic-era settlements in the study area and to analyze some relevant information from historical texts. The main questions addressed in this study are as follows: 1. What was the quality and quantity of Islamic-era settlements in the villages of Abbar and Darram? 2. What insights can be gained from comparing historical texts and archaeological evidence regarding the study area during the Islamic period? 3. Based on the survey data, which site or sites in the study area can be identified as the main centers in the basin of the Abbar and Darram villages during the Islamic period?
It is assumed that the study area housed various settlements during the Islamic period.

Research Method
This research was carried out in two parts: field and library studies. In the field section, the ancient sites of the study area were examined, and cultural materials, mainly including pottery fragments, were collected. In the library section, the Islamic pottery of the sites in the study area was typified, and the distribution of the sites in the region was examined and evaluated using common methods such as GIS. Additionally, special attention was paid to historical and geographical texts of the Islamic period in the library studies section.

Research Background
So far, very few archaeological studies have been conducted in the study area at Tarrom Olya County, the most important of which was the first season of the survey of Tarrom County under the supervision of A. Najafi in 2007, as a result of which 96 ancient sites related to different periods were identified (Najafi, 2007). The present study was conducted based on the results of this survey.

Discussion
- Historical and archaeological evidence of the study area in the early Islamic era
Historical sources indicate that during the Musafirid rule in the fourth century AH, the Tarrom region, particularly the fortress of Samiran, experienced a period of development and prosperity as mentioned in Naser Khosrow Qobadiani’s travelogue. Subsequently, the Tarrom region became a battleground between the Ismailis and Seljuks and a target for conquest by Mongol, Ilkhanid, and Timurid rulers seeking to control Gilan. Notably, Tughrol Beig visited Tarrom Castle in 454 AH and demanded a substantial sum from its ruler (Ibn Athir, 1991: vol. 22: 375). Various castles and locations in Tarrom, such as Andjan, Rustamkuyeh, Sheruz, Kufal, Harkam, Samiran, and Qalat, are mentioned in historical sources from this period (Hamawi, 1995; al-Baghdadi, 1412). Archaeological findings from eight sites in the Abbar and Darram districts, including Tape Las, Sharfan Darreh, Ghaybullah, Torobar, Tape Chenar, Mine Bala, Sibisun, and Dam, contain pottery dating back to the early Islamic period (Figs. 7 & 8, Table 2).

- Historical and archaeological evidence of the study area in the middle Islamic era
Tarrom also reappears in historical texts of the Mongol era due to its strategic location on the route to northern regions, particularly Gilan, and its proximity to key centers like Soltaniyeh (cf. Ibn Khaldun, 1984: vol. 4, 204; Hafez Abro, 2001, vol. 2: 572, 717, 766). The most accurate description of the Tarrom region at this time is provided by Hamdullah Mostofi Qazvini (d. 750 AH), who wrote:
“Tarromain is a warm province to the north of Soltaniyeh, a day’s journey away, and the harvest is very good in its highlands, and most of the fruits of Soltaniyeh come from there. At first, there was a city center called Firuzabad in the land of Lower Tarrom, but now it is completely ruined, and the town of Andar in Tarrom Olya has become the city there... The people of that province are Sunni Shafi’i, and that province has five parts: First, Upper Tarrom (Olya) was a vassal of Qala Taj, it includes about a hundred villages, and Jezla, Shawarzad, Darram, Jiya, Qalat, Zarand, and Shind are among its most important villages... (Mustofi, 1957: 71). Mustofi’s reference to Darram is the oldest reference to this place in historical texts.
At least seven sites in the study area in the villages of Abbar and Darram, including Abbar Cemetery, Torobar, Mine-Bala, Sibison, Dam, Kelavlagh, and Imamzadeh Vazneh-Sar, have had medieval Islamic pottery, especially Seljuk-Ilkhani pottery. These potteries are mostly glazed, sufficiently fired, and have various types of decoration, especially incised patterns, incised patterns under the glaze (Sgraffito), and underglaze painting (Table 3, Figs. 9 & 10).

- Historical and archaeological evidence of the study area in the later Islamic era
Historical records indicate that the Tarrom region remained of interest to Safavid rulers due to its proximity to important Safavid centers like Ardabil and Qazvin. For example, in 911 AH, Shah Ismail spent winter in Tarrom (Badlisi, 1998: Vol. 2, 137), and in 969 AH, Shah Tahmasb went to Tarrom for hunting (Ibid: 217). Pietro Della Valle, who traveled to the Tarrom region via Ardabil in 1619, during the reign of Shah Abbas I, reached Darram village through a narrow and difficult valley (Della Valle, 2005: 331-332). Della Valle’s description contains important information about the geographical features and communication routes of the region during the Safavid period.
From an archaeological point of view, some pottery sherds from the site of Burhan al-Saltaneh date back to the Timurid-Safavid period (Table 4 & Fig. 11). Notably, glazed pottery, including azure-glazed pieces likely from the Seljuk era, and monochromatic pottery with green, blue, and turquoise glaze possibly from the middle or late Islamic period, have been discovered at the study sites.
During the Qajar period, Tarrom continued to serve as a route for royal campaigns and recreational activities, with notable figures like Agha Mohammad Khan, Fath Ali Shah, and Naser al-Din Shah visiting the region (Fasai, 2003: Vol. 1, 645, & 720; Etemad al-Saltanah, 1988: Vol. 3, 1605). During this period, Rawlinson, while traveling to the region, mentioned Abbar and Darram as the two main places in the region of Posht kouh (Rawlinson 1840: 62-63). According to Rawlinson’s description, it is likely that part of the facility known today as Darram Castle is remains of the palace of Abdullah Mirza (d. 1263 AH), the son of Fath Ali Shah who was the ruler of Zanjan during the Qajar period. Based on our survey, Darram Castle is a large site dating back to the pre-Islamic and Islamic period, covering an area of about 20 hectares.
Additionally, based on the architectural style and type of materials, a number of buildings in the study area, including mosques or Imamzadeh, probably belong to the late Islamic period (mostly Qajar), of which we can mention Siahroud Bath, Imamzadeh Ebrahim, Imamzadeh Khatun Khadijeh, Burhan-ol-Saltaneh Mansion, Khasareh Bath, Khasareh Mosque, Molanour, and Imamzadeh Vazneh-Sar.

Conclusion
The analysis of historical texts and archaeological evidence provides valuable information about the settlements in the Tarrom region during the Islamic period, including the size of the settlements and communication routes in this region. Based on the data in Table 5, which was calculated based on our field survey, eight sites (44 percent) are less than one hectare in size. Eight sites are between one and five hectares (44%), and only three sites of Gerdeh Tepe, Tepe Qabristan, and Qala’e Darram are larger than five hectares, all three of which are located along the Qezel Uzan valley, along the main roads of the region. However, compared to the cities of the Islamic era, even these three sites are not considered large settlements. The map in Fig. 12 shows the distribution of Islamic sites in the study area regarding their sizes. Overall, these statistics indicate that most of the settlements in the Islamic period in the study area were, in fact, small, rural settlements, which is in exact accordance with the medieval geographers’ descriptions of the Tarrom as a region with numerous villages but no major city (see: Hamawi 1995: Vol. 2, p. 6; al-Baghdadi, 1412: 249).
It seems that Darram Castle can be considered a central settlement in the Islamic period in the Tarrom region due to its vast size of more than 20 hectares and its special location in the middle of the Qezel Uzan River valley, and the availability of important environmental components such as access to water resources and communication routes. Considering the description of Della Valle and the location of the Islamic sites in the study area, mainly in the Qezel Uzan River valley, it seems that the old roads in the study area were in accordance with the topographic conditions of the region and to a large extent coincided with or were close to the modern road.

Kalantar 5, A Middle Islamic Settlement in Upper Gotvand Dam Basin, Khuzestan

Hamid Reza Valipour

Abstract
The Upper Gotvand Dam, with a 90-kilometer-long lake, is one of the largest dams in the country, and its impoundment caused the flooding of a large number of ancient sites, ancient and modern migration routes, villages, and nomadic settlements in the northeastern region of Khuzestan. Before the dam was completed, a team of archaeologists surveyed its basin in 2007. After that, in 2008, a team of archaeologists from ICHTO of Khuzestan Province excavated the Kalantar site and the Kalantar cemetery, and then in April and May 2010, salvage excavations were carried out at Kalantar 4 & 5 sites to obtain as much information as possible, which yielded significant results. Following the excavation of the Kalantar 5 site, traces of residential stone architecture, plain buff and red pottery, and turquoise blue and green glazed pottery, as well as some ground stones such as grinding stones, mortars, and pounding stones, were found. According to typological comparisons on the potteries, it was determined that they belonged to the Middle Islamic period (fifth and sixth centuries AH), and the site was inhabited during the Seljuk period. In addition, it was determined that there is a great similarity between the stone architecture of the Kalantar 4 (a Neo-Elamite site), and the Kalantar 5, and with the local architecture of the region in the present time, both in villages and in nomadic settlements. In other words, the continuity of cultural traditions over several millennia is observed in this area.
Keywords: Kalantar 5, Gotvand Dam Basin, Middle Islamic Period, Stone Architecture, Islamic Glazed Pottery.

Introduction
The Upper Gotvand Dam was built on the Karun River near the small town of Gotvand to generate electricity and irrigate downstream agricultural lands, and a wide range of intermountain valleys, numerous ancient sites, ancient and modern migration routes, villages, and nomadic settlements were submerged in the 90-kilometer-long lake behind the dam. Before the dam was impounded, two teams led by Shahram Zare and Hossein Azizi Kharanghi, respectively, surveyed the area (Azizi Kharanghi et al., 2007). Salvage excavations were conducted by Hamidreza Valipour on two sites, Kalantar 4 and 5, which were found during the surveys in the spring of 2010 (Valipour, 2010a & b). The preliminary results of the excavation of Kalantar 5 will be presented here.
The first goal of the excavation, like all salvage excavations, was to access as much information as possible. Due to the proximity of Kalantar 5 to Kalantar 4 and the similarity of its surface architectural structure with the architecture of Kalantar 4, the excavation team was faced with some questions, the most important of which were: 1- Is Kalantar 5 an extension of the Kalantar 4 settlement and can we consider them as one site? 2- Was the settlement in Kalantar 5 established after the abandonment of Kalantar 4 and as a result of the displacement of its residents? 3- Does Kalantar 5 belong to a different time than Kalantar 4? Of course, given the presence of Islamic pottery on the surface of Kalantar 5, it was assumed that this area, in addition to the Elamite period, would also contain evidence of settlement from this period. 4- Function and type of settlement in Kalantar5.

Kalantar 5
Kalantar 5 is located on a natural hill south of Kalantar village (Ab Zālu Arab) in Lali County, at N: 32˚ 13΄ 42/6˝ latitude and E: 049˚ 04΄ 55/4˝ longitude, 160 meters north of Kalantar 4 and 13 kilometers east of the Gotvand Dam. The highest point of the site is 278 meters above sea level. The Karun River, the closest major water source to the site, flows 4.5 kilometers northeast of the site; a water stream also passes through the valley to the northwest.
During the excavation, one trench was opened at the highest part of the site, measuring 10×10 meters, where the regular stone pieces and traces of walls indicated the existence of architectural spaces in this part of the site. Given the depth of the natural bedrock, it was clear before the excavation began that not much height of the walls remained.

Architecture
A total of six architectural spaces were revealed during the excavation in Trench I. Stone and mud mortar were used in all the architectural structures. The stones used in the construction of the different parts of the complex are soft limestone in small to large sizes. All the stones lack cutting polish but have an almost regular shape. Many of the stones used in the architectural structures are cubed. The walls are rectangular. The walls lack any covering, and even during the excavation in the rubble layers, no samples of mud, plaster, or lime were found. The six aforementioned spaces seem to belong to the same building because they all share walls. It is possible that the natural bedrock of the hill was used as a floor for the spaces. Stone supports were used in addition to all the main and internal load-bearing walls. The entrances were mainly created by not connecting two walls or by cutting off part of the length of a wall. Next to some walls, there are smaller annexed spaces as storage places, which were probably used to store daily necessities or food or fuel, and they lacked any entrance and were accessed from above. A pyrotechnical structure was found inside one of the spaces, about one-fifth of which remains. Since a very small part of it remains, it is difficult to distinguish its function as an oven or else. No evidence of a roof or debris was found during the excavation. Given the relatively small width of the spaces and the absence of columns, the roofs of the spaces were most likely created using parallel wooden poles and covered with mats or tree branches and mud. This reconstruction was carried out in comparison with the current situation in the village adjacent to the site. The reason for this comparison is the great similarity of the architecture obtained from the settlement spaces of the site with the architecture of the adjacent village.

Pottery
The 319 potsherds recovered from the excavation are divided into two major groups: plain and glazed. 265 sherds (83%) of the total are unglazed. Unglazed pottery can be divided into two groups: buff and red. The technology of pottery production is completely similar in terms of form, manufacturing technique, inclusion, firing, and decoration. Most of the sherds are wheel-made (96%). The inner and outer surfaces of the pottery are unpolished, and both sides of the vessels are smoothed by the wet hand method. Rarely, red wash was used to cover a handful of buff wares. The texture of buff ware is much more cohesive than that of red ware. Mineral materials such as fine to coarse sand were used as an inclusion in unglazed pottery; in one of the red potteries, the inclusion is a combination of organic and mineral materials. In general, the quality of buff-colored pottery is better than that of reds, and the number of buff sherds is much greater than that of reds. 236 sherds (74% of all pottery and 89% of unglazed pottery) are buff, and 29 sherds (9% of all pottery and 11% of unglazed pottery) are red. There are 10 sherds of pottery with incised decoration in the unglazed buff group.
54 pieces (17%) of the pottery are glazed. Except for two pieces with green glaze, the rest are turquoise blue. The pottery of this group is in the category of pottery with monochromatic glaze. Five pieces are also of the sgraffiato type with turquoise blue glaze. In terms of form, manufacturing technique, inclusion, firing, and color, these sherds are completely similar to the unglazed buff wares. The inclusion of all samples is mineral.
The reconstructed forms are the jar (44.5%), bowl (37%), and bowl (18.5%), respectively. The sherds date back to the 5th and 6th centuries AH and are dated to the Seljuk period (Karimi & Kiani, 1985; Towhidi, 2000; Kambakhshfard, 2001; Grube, 1994; Treptow, 2007).

Other Cultural Materials
In addition to pottery, other cultural materials recovered included animal remains, pounding stones, stone mortars, pivots, iron nails, iron knife, the bottom, rim, and body of transparent or opaque glass vessels in blue, yellow, and milky colors, as well as a few broken shells.

Conclusion
Kalantar 5 is a rural settlement site from the Middle Islamic period because considering the landscape of the region, the location of the site, the extent of the architectural remains, and the dispersion of cultural materials, it is unlikely that the settlement was urban. There is no connection between the sites of Kalantar 4 and 5 from a cultural and temporal perspective. An interesting point to note is the similarity of the architectural structures of this site with the architecture of Kalantar 4 and the modern village of Ab Zālū Arab and other nomadic villages and settlements in the region. With an ethnoarchaeological approach, this similarity can be considered a kind of cultural continuity in architecture. Perhaps the same environmental and subsistence conditions can be considered the reason for the construction of similar architecture over a long period.
The buildings were constructed using completely local materials, such as stone and mud. All the stones are limestone, ranging in size from small to large, and are uncut and unpolished but have a fairly regular shape, and many of the stones have been broken using chisels and hammers. It seems that the six identified spaces had both roofed and open sections. The three spaces 1, 3, and 4 were associated with activities that required separation from the residential areas; the three spaces 2, 5, and 6, which are part of the main residential complex, were probably places for resting and performing other daily activities. These three spaces are connected by some entrances.
All finds, from functional examples such as pottery, glass vessels, pounding stones, and mortars to decorative shells, indicate a normal settlement, and all of them are related to daily life activities.
The pottery of the Kalantar 5 bears no resemblance to the Kalantar 4 site. Many of them are Islamic glazed pottery, including monochrome green and turquoise blue glazes and some with incised patterns under the turquoise blue glaze. The pottery is not very diverse in terms of color, glaze, type, and theme of the patterns. These potteries date back to the fifth and sixth centuries AH and are dated to the Seljuk period. During this period, the glass industry in Iran was very prosperous (Shishehgar, 2003: 24), and glass fragments recovered from a rural settlement site confirm this.

Analysis of the Inscriptions and Decorative Elements of the Qotub Minaret

Mozhgan Esmaili

Abstract
India, with its very cultural and religious diversity, underwent changes and transformations with the domination of the Mamluk government. The minaret as one of the elements of Islamic architecture, apart from playing the role of the minaret, was a symbol of Islamic rule. The minaret is a lasting symbol of the rich history of India, architectural skills and cultural exchange. The purpose of this research is the analysis of decorative elements and re-reading the inscriptions of “Minaret Qutub”, by answering these questions, what effect did the decorative elements of Islamic architecture have on this building? And what are the themes of the inscriptions? The research method of this research is based on library studies, study of first-hand sources, field studies and objective observations of the author and has been done by describing, analyzing and using historical sources. The results of this study show that the minaret is decorated under the influence of aesthetics and elements of Islamic architecture, and the decorative elements of the Qutub minaret are a combination of Islamic and Indian elements. Although the minaret follows the general form of Islamic minarets, it contains elements of Indian architecture such as precise and complex carvings, the use of sand, red stone and marble, the use of lotus flowers and bell-shaped decorations, various inscriptions, geometric and plant motifs that It reflects the combined nature of Indian and Islamic architecture, and the title “Indo-Islamic” architecture can be used for the art of the Mamluk period.
Keywords: Decorative Elements, Inscriptions, Islamic Architecture, Indian Architecture, Mamluk, Qutub Minaret.

Introduction
The Qutub in Delhi is a notable example of Islamic architecture, but it also incorporates elements of Indian design. The use of intricate stone carving techniques, geometric patterns, and calligraphic inscriptions is prominent in this period. This assimilation of diverse influences and the development of a unique artistic style continued to flourish in the following centuries.
In 588 AH, Mu’izzuddin Muhammad Ghori succeeded in capturing the city of Delhi and, while there was no heir to Muhammad Ghori, appointed Qutbuddin Aybak as the successor to the Ghorid government there. He established the Mamluk rule in Delhi and established the first Islamic state called the “Delhi Sultanate”. The Mamluk sultans, who were originally from Central Asia and Iran, brought with them a rich architectural tradition that combined elements of Iranian, Islamic and Indian styles. This fusion led to the development of unique architectural features such as the use of arches, domes, minarets and intricate decorative motifs.
The Qutub Minaret in Delhi is a notable example of Islamic architecture but also incorporates elements of Indian design. The use of intricate stone carving techniques, geometric patterns and calligraphic inscriptions were prominent during this period.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the decorative elements and reinterpret the inscriptions of the “Minaret of Qutub”, in order to answer the questions, what effects did the decorative elements of Islamic architectural art have on this building? And what topics do the themes of the inscriptions express?
This research seeks to understand the themes of the inscriptions by rereading the inscriptions, the inscriptions of this building have been objectively observed and rewritten, while explaining the concepts of symbols and decorative elements, it aims to clarify the effects of Islamic art on the aforementioned building.

Discussion
The Qutub Minar is the tallest brick building in the world with a height of 72.5 meters and a diameter of about 14 at the base and about 3 meters at the highest balcony. The Qutub Minar has five floors and a spiral staircase with 379 steps. The entrance to the minaret is through a door facing north. Between each floor, a circular porch surrounds the building. This porch plays an effective role in maintaining and supporting the weight of the upper floors. Materials such as red and light brown sandstone and gray quartzite were used in the construction of this building, and its two rows are made of white marble.. Indo-Islamic structures often incorporate elements inspired by Hindu and Jain temple architecture. This approach results in a unique combination of forms, motifs and techniques.
Geometric shapes in Islamic architecture often represent the concept of unity, harmony, and precise mathematical proportions and symmetrical arrangements of patterns, the idea of balance and order in the universe, and reflect the belief in the harmonious interaction of various elements in creation.The repetition of geometric shapes with no discernible beginning or end was seen as indicative of the infinite and eternal nature of God.
The Qutub Minaret features intricate carvings, geometric patterns, and ornamental designs that are indicative of the art of its time. Its five floors are separated by carved balconies and fluted columns with Muqarnas decorations. The decorative elements used in Mamluk architecture reflect the sophisticated artistry, aesthetic appeal, and symbolic meanings associated with Islamic art and architecture. They represent a combination of mathematical precision, decorative beauty, and spiritual symbolism. The repetition of geometric shapes without a discernible beginning or end indicated the boundless and eternal nature of God.
Geometric shapes in Islamic architecture often represent the concept of unity, harmony, and precise mathematical proportions and symmetrical arrangements of patterns, the idea of balance and order in the universe, and reflect the belief in the harmonious interaction of various elements in creation.
The inscriptions on the minaret provide valuable historical information about its construction. On each floor, there are two relief inscriptions containing the names of rulers and sultans. The inscriptions on the Qutub Minaret include verses from the Holy Quran, the names and titles of rulers associated with the building, and historical information about its construction.
These inscriptions are skillfully and beautifully executed in calligraphy.
Various styles of Arabic calligraphy such as Kufic, Naskh and Thuluth can be seen on the minaret.

Conclusion
The influence of Islamic culture and civilization in the 6th century AH with the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate had a profound impact on the Indian subcontinent. This state, which was the beginning of Muslim rule in India, served as a political and cultural center for the spread of Islamic civilization. The influence of Islamic culture and civilization in India can be seen in various fields, and Islamic architecture in India in particular flourished from the period of the Delhi Sultanates.The architectural elements, decorations, symbols and signs common to Islamic architecture were incorporated into almost all the buildings of the Delhi Sultanate period and later became a common practice in Indian architecture. Several architectural innovations were introduced during the Delhi Sultanate period. These innovations included the construction of minarets, the use of complex stone carving techniques, geometric designs and calligraphic inscriptions, which were prominent during this period.The inscriptions on the building, which are mainly in Arabic, contain verses from the Holy Quran as well as information about the construction of the building. The oldest inscription at the base of the Qutub Minar is attributed to Qutubuddin Aibak, the founder of the Delhi Sultanate. As you ascend the minaret, the text of the inscriptions reflects later additions and renovations made by the rulers of subsequent periods.The inscriptions also display linguistic diversity, with the diversity of Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Hindi languages reflecting the multicultural nature of the Delhi Sultanate. This building is also noteworthy in terms of calligraphy styles and technical techniques of carving and decorative elements and layout, while the symbols and motifs of each one convey a specific meaning to the viewer.Another prominent feature of Indian and Islamic architecture is the use of red sandstone and marble. The use of red sandstone along with decorative elements made of marble creates a significant contrast and adds to the attractiveness of the structures.
The creation and attractiveness of the structures has added to the charm.Indian decorative motifs are often inspired by nature and the local environment. By incorporating these motifs, Indo-Islamic architecture was able to adapt itself to the local context. During the period of the Delhi Sultans, the fusion of Islamic and Indian culture led to Indo-Islamic art, which was characterized by the fusion of Persian, Turkish and Arabic elements with indigenous Indian traditions, resulting in a unique architectural style. The intricate carvings on the minaret, including lotus flower motifs and bell-shaped motifs, indicate a cultural fusion that occurred during the Delhi Sultans and highlighted the inclusive nature of Islamic art.

A Comparative Study of the Image of “Esfandiyar Slays Arjasp” in the Baysunghur Sahnameh and the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb; Emphasizing the Formalist Approach

Ali Salmani

Abstract
The Baysunghur Sahnameh and the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb have rightly been considered as two unique artistic masterpieces in the history of Iranian painting. To find out the pure aesthetic values of these two versions, the best method that can be used is the method of formalistic analysis. In the formalist approach, what is important is the analysis of formal visual elements that painters have used to convey an aesthetic feeling or emotion. Therefore, with a formalistic approach, this research examines two versions of the same story, that is, “Esfandiyar Slays Arjasp” in these two Shahnameh. Obviously, in this research, elements such as line, shape, color and in general the design and composition of these paintings have been subjected to formal analysis. Based on this, the current research has clearly sought to answer this question: in terms of the formalist approach, what are the similarities and differences between these two common images of Baysunghur and Shah Tehamasb Shahnameh? Obviously, in order to answer this question, what are the main features of the painting “Esfandiyar Slays Arjasp” in the two versions of Baysunghur and Shah Tahmasb based on the formalist approach? By comparing the mentioned paintings, it was found that The Baysunghur Sahnameh is richer than Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb in terms of the use of lines appropriate to the nature of the story, the clear depiction of the story, and the symbolic treatment of the story. Of course, it is worth mentioning that, on the other hand, Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb presents a kind of decorative representation of the story, and therefore, it tried to make the story appear dramatic. The method of the present research is descriptive-analytical based on comparing the illustrations of two versions of Shahnameh, and the data collection method was library.
Keywords: Form, Formalism, Formalist Analysis, The Baysunghur Sahnameh, The Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb.

Introduction
In Iran’s long tradition of book design, perhaps no work has been illustrated as much as Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh. Meanwhile, in the Timurid and Safavid periods, due to the rise of art-loving and tasteful rulers and the favorable social conditions, we witness the creation of the most valuable illustrated Shahnamehs. Undoubtedly, the most prominent illustrated Shahnameh of the Timurid period is the “the Baysunghur Sahnameh” and the masterpiece of the Safavid period is the “the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb”. These two irreplaceable masterpieces have been a suitable vehicle for the emergence of Iranian-Islamic aesthetics. It seems that no approach like the formalist approach can explain the characteristics of these two masterpieces purely in terms of art and aesthetics.
Accordingly, formalism is an approach to art that emphasizes the importance of form and its priority over content as the source of the subjective attraction of the work. Therefore, any formalist analysis of works of art essentially considers the aesthetic effects created by the design components. These components, which are called formal elements, form the basis of the artist’s visual language. These components can be categorized as follows: line, overall shape, space, color, and light and dark. These components themselves can also be considered to include elements such as balance, order and proportion, and pattern and rhythm which, together with the first components, create specific reactions in the audience. The artist brings all these components and elements together in an arrangement that is called composition. Having said that, our formalist analysis of the common selected image in the two Shahnamehs of Baysunghur and Shah Tahmasb in this research will proceed based on the above components and elements, and in the conclusion section, the necessary results will be obtained from the comparison of these components in the two mentioned versions.

Discussion
In general, the predominant use of dry, diagonal and angled lines in Baysanghari’s Shahnameh has caused the atmosphere of confrontation and battle to be shown well. While the soft and gentle lines of the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb are not very similar to the displayed subject. The asymmetric composition chosen by painters of the Baysunghur Sahnameh to show this story is completely in harmony with the real atmosphere of the battle. A battle which, according to the text of the Shahnameh, is not an ordinary battle of the type of wars fought between two armies; This battle is mostly a secret operation and it goes step by step according to a predetermined plan and therefore it is very complicated and calculated. Breaking the space through the masterly display of the fortress walls with sharp diagonal lines, speaks of the creative courage of the painters of this version and shows well the difficulty of entering the fortress and the difficulty of mastering it during the battle. It is precisely for this reason that Esfandiyar is forced to enter the fortress as a merchant delegation. In addition, the fortress described in the story was very strong (it was built only with stones) and it was located in a mountainous area. The painter has succeeded in creating the feeling of encountering a complex and unattainable building in the audience with an extremely masterful display of an uneven castle with a complex plan and steps. On the other hand, the composition of Tehamasbi’s painting is almost symmetrical and balanced; It is as if the battle depicted is a normal battle where the people who are at war are concerned about being in a specific place that the painter has determined for them to maintain the balance of the scene; If a war is depicted in this scene, this war is not so real, but it is completely staged and decorated.

Conclusion
The findings of this research with regard to the main question, i.e. the question that “in terms of the formalist approach, what are the similarities and differences between these two common images of The Baysunghur Sahnameh and the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb?” It is supposed to:
- In terms of the adaptation of the illustrated story with the verses of the Shahnameh, it can be claimed that the image belonging to the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb is more bound to the verses of the Shahnameh. The display of time and clothes of merchants for Esfandiyar’ soldiers in Shah Tehamasb’s images confirms this claim. But none of these things are shown in the image belonging to The Baysunghur Sahnameh. Of course, in the show of the strong and tangled fortress, Baysunghur’s image is more bound to the verses of the Shahnameh.
- In the painting belonging to the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb, the story of Arjasab’s murder is depicted by showing his throat being cut by Esfandiyar, while in Baysunghur’s painting, the mentioned theme is shown by pulling Arjasab down from the throne to the ground. Therefore, it is possible to refer to the symbolic and metaphorical treatment of The Baysunghur’s image, in contrast to the explicit and direct expression of Shah Tehamasbi’s image.
- The composition of Baysunghur’s image is completely in harmony with the subject of the story, while the composition of Shah Tehamasb’s image is completely balanced and symmetrical and does not match the depiction of a real war.
- The Baysunghur Sahnameh painter has deliberately and at the same time boldly broken up the space to show the complex architecture, mountainous location, tangled and impassable nature of Arjasab fortress. On the other hand, the space shown in shah Tehamasb version is almost uniform, and apparently only a small part of the complex space of Baysanghari’s image was chosen for it. For this reason, The Baysunghur Sahnameh painter has acted more boldly and creatively.
- The main concern of the painter of The Baysunghur Sahnameh painting is the clear and clear depiction of the story, and for this reason, the image is divided into three parts from the bottom to the top, which clearly shows the story step by step, both with uniform colors and close to each other. Almost the same clothes (two types of military uniforms) have been used, and it has been avoided to show any extra or dramatic elements. On the other hand, painting of the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasb has more emotional and dramatic content and apparently has a great desire to dramatize the story and show it decoratively.

Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Analysis on “Lion and Sun” Motif Studies

Samad Samanian

Abstract
The motif of “Lion and Sun”, which has become an important visual-culture discourse in recent years, has always been questioned and was the subject of scholarly inquiry regarding its origin and meaning, and different analyzes of the motif have been offered. However, it appears that the literature on the subject has not been able to resolve the prevailing disputes and there are still a great deal of divergent viewpoints and disagreements over motif. In order to resolve the equation of these conflicts, one must first know the quality of previous studies and the degree to which it can be relied upon as a source for new studies. The aim of this research is to evaluate the quality level of studies and find their advantages and disadvantages. Every study that has directly addressed the motif “Lion and Sun” as well as other studies in which there are texts concerning the motif, printed or gray sources, has been subjected to a systematically review and meta-analyze. A total of 150 studies were examined using specific search techniques in Persian and English search databases like Google, Web of Science, Noormags, Irandoc, etc. (without a time limit). Following a screening process using predefined criteria, 27 studies were chosen for qualitative meta-analysis. The results of the qualitative meta-analysis are expressed using tables and distribution and frequency charts. The findings of this meta-analysis demonstrate that a significant portion of all studies have referenced earlier works and quoted earlier speeches in their publications, without conducting the essential study and investigations. Additionally, it was found that research on motif has stagnated for 20 years, which needs investigation and pathology in its place.
Keywords: Lion and Sun, Qualitative Meta-Analysis, Screening Studies, Searching Strategy.

Introduction
The number of depictions of “Lion and Sun” on the national flag of Iran or coins and other works of art from the Qajar to the Pahlavi period has made it become an important visual-cultural discourse. This discourse, with its continued presence in Iranian art and culture and role-playing as a national-patriotic symbol and finding a way to political and social issues, has caused the history of the presence and the meaning of it in Iranian art to be questioned and researched, and different analysis has been made on it. Be provided. It seems that the texts written about it have not had reliable results and there are various opinions about it. In the meantime, the connection of socio-political powers with cultural symbols and signs creates serious conflicts in people’s lifestyles, so that the simplest cultural actions may be involved with the most complex layers of political, economic, and social structures. This research, by rereading the studies done on the motif, tries to contribute, however little, in clarifying this cultural issue to achieving a new way of understanding the issue. The main goal of this research is to analyses the qualitative level of the studies conducted on motif, which is done to answer the question of to what extent and how can these studies be cited. Firstly, it is necessary to know what research has been done so far regarding the motif, what research elements and components they have, and what strengths and weaknesses should be considered in them. Finally, the expected results of this research are reaching a conclusion from the qualitative evaluation of the studies conducted and showing the gaps and research needs in this field.
The present research is practical in terms of purpose. Data collection is done in a documentary way from library sources and the data analysis method is a systematic review and then a qualitative meta-analysis. For this purpose, studies focusing on the research question are identified and reviewed in Prisma’s instruction, and the results are combined, statistically analyzed, and qualitatively evaluated. The statistical population of this research is all studies related to the motif, including articles, books, theses, and gray texts. After a systematic review of 150 studies, 27 studies were selected for qualitative meta-analysis. SPSS was used to draw graphs.

Discussion
Of the 27 meta-analyzed studies, 9 studies are books (33%), 11 studies are articles (41%), 3 theses (11%), and 4 sources contain gray texts (15%).
The period of conducting studies in 6 studies related to the 1960s (22%), 4 studies before that (15%), 1 study related to the 90s (4%), 9 studies in the 2000s (33%), 7 studies were done in the 2010s (26%). It seems that in the 1970s and 1980s, no research was done on the motif.
Because most of the studies are related to the period before the 70s, the method of conducting research in them is often not stated correctly. But with the evaluation, the method was diagnosed in 15 studies as descriptive-historical (71%), and 6 studies as descriptive-historical-comparative (29%). In newspapers, data has been collected through quotations and interviews.
18 studies (67%) have a direct connection with the motif in the title, and 9 studies (33%) have mentioned it only in a part of their research.
Out of 27 studies, 6 studies (22%) were conducted abroad of Iran, 21 studies (78%) were conducted inside, 25 studies (93%) were conducted by Iranians and 2 studies (7%) were conducted by non-Iranians.
Almost from the 2000s onwards, citing previous studies instead of citing primary sources and works of art and objects increased. Before 2004, historical texts in 11 studies (26%), literary texts in 6 studies (14%), motif on coins in 10 studies (24%), motif on the flag in 9 studies (22%), and other works of art in 6 studies (14%) have been cited. These studies can be classified as primary studies and the research after that can be called follow-up studies using secondary sources.
In at least 18 studies out of all the studies, sources from the 60s and earlier have been cited. Minavi in 5 studies (12%), Kasravi in 11 studies (26%), Nafisi in 10 studies (24%), Nayernuri in 10 studies (24%), Zoka in 6 studies (14%) the most have been cited. This means that the data from these 5 studies (primary studies) has been replicated in follow-up studies. In 8 out of 27 studies, sources other than those mentioned in this research and other references are cited sporadically.
In all the meta-analyzed studies, words and terms related to the concept of “Lion and Sun” have been repeated, which are classified as follows:
Kingdom: power, king, Georgian princess
Astrology: Leo sign, Sun, Star
Religion: Shiite, Imam Ali, Prophet Muhammad, Lion of God, Shamsa
Mythology: Ahuramazda, Mehr, Mithra, Anahita, the guardian Lion of the temple
Mythological concepts were inferred in 10 studies (20%), religious concepts in 11 studies (21%), astrological concepts in 10 studies (20%), and kingdom concepts in 20 studies (29%).
The composition of the time of analyzed-studies and the concepts inferred by their authors is shown in the following table:

Conclusion
After reviewing the findings and after quantitative and qualitative analysis of the statistics, it was found that 37% of the studies were conducted before the Islamic Revolution in Iran. In the 1970s and 1980s, there was a stagnation in conducting studies, and since the 1990s, 63% of studies have been conducted. Among the 27 meta-analysed studies, only 67% of them have directly addressed motif, and the remaining 33% have devoted a part of their research to it. This result shows that there are still a few specialized studies, unlike the importance of motif in Iranian culture and art. In the studies before the Islamic revolution, historical texts were cited in 26%, literary texts in 14%, motif on coins in 24%, motif on flags in 22%, and other motif on works of art in 14%. Kasravi’s book is cited in 26% of all studies. After that, the books of Nafisi and Nayernuri have been cited in 24% of the studies. This means that the data from 5 studies before the Islamic revolution (primary studies) has been repeated in the studies after that (follow-up studies). In general, it can be said that 40% of all studies completely relied on sources before the Islamic Revolution which have been cited frequently. By respecting the efforts of previous researchers, regarding research pathology, it seems that the weak points of previous research have been repeated in subsequent studies and subsequent studies have not been free from the domination of previous and repetitive data. The concepts of motif mentioned in 27 studies were divided into 4 mythological, kingdom, religious, and astrological groups based on the keywords used in the study. Among all studies, 39% considered motif to be related to kingdom concepts, 21% considered religious concepts to be valid, and mythological and astrological concepts were considered in 20% of them. Mythological and religious concepts have been considered more from the 2000s onwards, and the concepts of kingdom and astrology have been almost important in all periods. The research method was identified as descriptive-historical in 71% of studies. Since the research method in historical studies is about a new subject, and in the past, the authors have not adhered to the use of scientific methods to write historical research, it can be safely said that none of the previous studies have been a scientific study in line with modern research methods in the present era and, despite the number of studies, the aforementioned works have serious weaknesses in terms of quality and methodology. On the other hand, the results of this research show that the socio-political conditions have marked stagnation in the study and research. As a result, the studies that have been done so far are rarely referable.

Explaining the Principles of Conservation of Historical-Archaeological Sites (Case Study: Arjan Historical-Archaeological Site)

Ali ZamaniFard

Abstract
Historical-archaeological sites are the most important sources to answer the missing links of a nation’s history and civilization. These areas always have diverse values, which identification and understanding of these values provides the basis for recognizing their protectable aspects. Today, most of these sites in Iran are in vulnerable conditions and their values are being forgotten. The historical-archaeological site of Arjan is located in the Khuzestan plain, which existed from the Elamite era to the Mongol era. Today, this area is in unfavorable conservation conditions. Considering the values and historical importance of the old city of Arjan in the historical periods of Iran, it is very important to protect this area and create a suitable platform to benefit from its values. Among the questions that are answered in this research;1. What are the values of Arjan historical site? 2. What are the challenges of protecting Arjan’s site? 3. How can we achieve conservation principles for the protection and valuation of the historical archaeological site of Arjan in accordance with its values? Accordingly, the objectives of the research؛ 1. Understanding the Arjan site and its conservation challenges; 2. Achieving conservation principles through the analysis of international charters, declarations, conventions and documents and generalizing them to a study sample in order to explain the principles of conservation and value it. The general research method of this research is descriptive-analytical, based on the data collected through library resources and field observations. Then, after analyzing and reviewing international documents and recognizing the historical site of Arjan and its conservation challenges in four fields of cognitive, managerial, legal, physical, and introduction and valuation of the site, principles such as providing information to the public, developing a comprehensive interaction plan, developing public management plans, reversibility of actions, preserving originality and respect for historical and aesthetic values and the physical integrity of the sites are presented.
Keywords: Arjan, Historical-Archaeological Site, Conservation, Historical Values, Introduction of Values.

Introduction
Historical-archaeological sites are the most important sources to answer the missing links of a nation’s history and civilization. These sites will answer many general and partial questions that can be varied and variable over time, so the conservation of the sites is essential for transfer to future generations. Historical archaeological sites have a variety of values and in order to benefit from these values, they are always protected. After archaeological excavations in Iran, these sites are often in vulnerable conditions and are exposed to forgetting their values.
The archaeological site of Arjan is located in the plain of Khuzestan. Arjan is a city with various urban organs in the historical periods of Iran. This site has values, features and elements that are unique in its kind. In 1362, a tomb belonging to Kidin Hotran, one of the Elamite kings, was discovered. Afterwards, Esmaeil Yaghmaei carried out archaeological excavations and studies in the Arjan area and in the area of Maroon Dam and Arjan Grand Mosque and Dr. Abbas Moghaddam conducted archaeological excavations in the area of the oil well during two seasons. With the cessation of excavations in this site, the old city of Arjan, like most historical sites in Iran, was placed in undesirable conditions of conservation.
Research Necessity: The city of Arjan has been standing from the Elamite era to the Mongol era. (Today, this area, despite its historical and archaeological importance and values, is in unfavorable conservation conditions) Considering these values and the historical importance of the ancient city of Arjan in the historical periods of Iran, as well as the necessity of continuing archaeological studies and the availability of its original data among researchers and enthusiasts, it is very important to protect this site and create a suitable platform for benefiting from its values.
Research objectives: 1. Understanding the Arjan site and its conservation challenges; 2. Achieving conservation principles through the analysis of charters, statements, conventions and international documents and generalizing them to a study sample in order to explain the principles of conservation and valuation of the archaeological site of Arjan.
Research Questions: 1. What are the values of Arjan historical site? 2. What are the challenges of protecting Arjan’s site? 3. How can we achieve conservation principles for the protection and valuation of the historical archaeological site of Arjan in accordance with its values?
Research Methodology: The general research method is descriptive-analytical approach. In this research, library studies and field studies have been utilized to gather information.

Discussion
“Archaeological heritage” is a material heritage that includes all traces of human life and includes places that show human activities, abandoned structures, and remnants, along with all the movable cultural objects discovered related to it (ICOMOS, 1990). These sites have a variety of values and in order to benefit from these values, they are always conserved. By reviewing the international documents related to the sites in Table 3, the set of conservation principles in four areas, cognitive, legal and managerial, physical, and the introduction and valuation of the site, has been displayed.
The archaeological site of Arjan with an area of 500 hectares is located on the slopes of Khoiz Mountain and in a wide plain next to the Maroon River, which includes the Mosque Jammeh, the Arjan Dam Bath and Bridge, the Qadamgah of Imam Reza (AS), the Rosh Mehr Building, the Arjan Qanats and the ancient hills. By examining the site and the buildings in it, the values are divided into two categories, cultural values and contemporary economic and social values (Diagram 5). At present, the buildings in the Arjan site are in an undesirable state of conservation and their values are in danger of being forgotten. Through field surveys, the damages and challenges of the Arjan site were identified in four areas, cognitive, legal and managerial, physical and tourism, and were divided into two groups, internal and external factors. Internal factors include cognitive domain, exhaustion (functional physical) and weakness in the infrastructure of the Arjan site, and external factors include lack of alignment of organizations and weakness in the managerial and legal structure. According to the mentioned damages and challenges, by identifying their roots and categorizing them in the form of internal and external factors, we have achieved five conservation challenges related to the historical archaeological site of Arjan (Diagram 4). By adapting the principles of conservation of historical sites to conservation challenges, the principles of conservation of the Arjan site are stated in Table 4.

Conclusion
Historical archaeological sites can be considered as the most important sources for answering the missing links of a nation’s history and civilization. These sites always have a variety of values, and identifying and understanding these values can provide the ground for recognizing their protectable aspects. In the twentieth century (in 1914 and 1916), the main law for the protection of historical sites was adopted, and at that time, terms for the protection of historical sites were created in international charters. In the first part of this research, international charters, documents and conventions were examined in terms of keywords related to historical archaeological sites and the conservation principles related to the sites were identified in 4 areas. In the second part, in relation to the study area, with the knowledge of the old city of Arjan and with an analytical view of field studies, through the analysis, investigation and categorization of the challenges of conserving the historical archaeological site of Arjan and the comparison of the challenges with the principles extracted from international charters, documents and conventions, led to the explanation of the principles of the conservation of the historical archaeological site of Arjan.
The principles of conservation of the Arjan site were presented in four areas: cognitive, managerial, legal, physical, and introduction and valuation of the site. One of the most important principles in the field of cognition was to provide information to the people and to develop a comprehensive interaction plan. Formulation of public management programs, coordination and cooperation between institutions and people, and formulation of intervention laws are among the most important principles in the field of management and law. In the physical field, the reversibility of actions, preservation of originality, continuity of vernacular architecture and native materials, and documentation of changes were mentioned. Respecting the historical and aesthetic values and the physical integrity of historical buildings and sites is one of the most important principles in the field of introducing and valuing the site. It should be noted that these cases, along with other conservation principles proposed in the research, lead to the improvement of the condition of the archaeological site of Arjan.

Contexts of Extracting Criteria in Traditional Arts Based on Holistic Viewpoint

Apena Esfandiari

Abstract
In the problem statement, necessity of the research, it should be mentioned that the metrics: standards, norms, principles, and specific criteria are created from within traditional Islamic art that have not been borrowed like Western art, which has been less comprehensively addressed. Hypothesis: There are two aspects and, realms in the rules and concepts of metrics that exist integrally. Some of these principles relate to the etiquette, foundational teachings of jurisprudence and Islamic texts, the observance of spiritual manners, ethics, and human virtues, while another part pertains to the formal aspects of the works involved. paying attention to both the outward and inward dimensions simultaneously. General objective: extracting the above aspects from a holistic perspective, top-down and deductive, from the whole to the part. Identifying all the platforms from which metrics can be extracted from their essence and core. The formal and external aspects are quantitative, formal, and tangible, while the non-formal and internal aspects are philosophical, qualitative, content-based, intangible. The form or external aspect aligns with the content and meaning inferred from the inner form associated with it. It also defines and describes the multidimensional nature of traditional arts that leads to categorization. The mentioned items in response to this question are how the contexts and backgrounds from which the metrics can be extracted are identified? The importance of research: understanding the necessity or lack of traditional art history writing in the realm of traditional and extracting intangible heritage from within oral culture and transforming it into written form. The tools for data collection: library resources and interviews with expert professors in Tehran. The research method is descriptive-analytical. The findings and results of the study: reaching contexts with two different classifications within the core of society and culture along with their subsets. By being dependent on various factors, metrics are extracted from within them by identifying them, leading to a relatively comprehensive classification of the metrics.
Keywords: Criteria, Horizons, Introspective, Holistic Approach.

Introduction
Extracting metrics from layers of history, culture, and art depends on many diverse factors that researchers rarely discuss or analyze. The need to identify the contexts that allow experts to extract metrics in traditional arts counts as a fundamental issue and invites a unified and deep top down view and at times a reverse view. These contexts include tangible and intangible aspects and the analysis and interpretation of texts grounded in the logic of these works, which often draw on revelatory, hadith based, and narrative sources and other principles that guided traditional Muslim life from transmission to reason. The results draw on historical sources and treatises left by artisans and craftsmen and finally shape the rules, principles, and metrics of Islamic traditional art. The Muslim view of crafts, trades, and arts shaped a process of production that did not generate the experience of the Western Enlightenment. This process treated art as one of many efforts and actions that guide the human being toward ultimate perfection, which held great importance. One question in this study asks which tangible and intangible aspects shape the extraction of these metrics and how researchers classify them. The main hypothesis states that two realms in the rules and concepts of metrics function in an integrated way. One part relates to etiquette, principled thought, and Islamic texts, the practice of spiritual etiquette, moral conduct, and human virtues, and the other part relates to the formal aspects of works. This means a combined focus on the outward world and the inner world. The secondary hypothesis asks which contexts allow experts to extract these metrics. The study aims to identify these contexts and grounds and finds that the metrics draw on principled thought to evaluate artworks, on their cultural setting, the spirit of the time, historical periods, style, tools, literature, poetry and mysticism, chivalric manuals and treatises, oral culture, and many similar sources that help build a relatively coherent classification in the history of traditional arts. They often include technical skill and tools, aesthetic qualities, style, shape, form, color, structure, historical periods, or social and popular connections. A metric means a form of measurement that researchers use when they examine and evaluate a specific feature or a set of features.

Discussion
Indicators are utilized across various disciplines such as mathematics, statistics, and the social sciences, as well as more broadly in data analysis and performance evaluation. Fundamentally, indicators enable us to examine and measure characteristics in quantitative—and in some cases qualitative—terms, and to make informed decisions based on these assessments. In this study, the indicators are predominantly qualitative. Traditional art encompasses a set of indicators, some of which are dispersed throughout different historical and scholarly sources, while others remain undocumented and contain conceptual gaps. Due to the oral nature of transmission and other contributing factors, these indicators must be identified, extracted, and developed from within the tradition itself. In order to construct cultural identity, heritage must first be shaped; thus, the heritage and identity that emerge require safeguarding to prevent them from falling into obscurity. The identification of indicators of Islamic traditional art is grounded in historical texts, travel accounts, critical analyses of artworks, and meticulous documentation of artistic objects. Such documentation plays a vital role in preserving and transmitting knowledge regarding Islamic traditional arts. Futuwwa treatises and similar manuscripts serve as valuable resources, offering interpretations and analyses of Iranian traditional art and its cultural, popular, historical, and aesthetic values. These sources significantly enhance the understanding and interpretation of artistic works. Given the significance of Futuwwat-nameh treatises and related texts, scholars and specialists in Iranian traditional arts continuously examine and investigate these materials, employing them to refine, expand, and enrich the corpus of indicators associated with Iranian traditional art.

Conclusion
According to the available documentation, indicators represent specific standards which, within Islamic traditional art, derive their norms, principles, and criteria intrinsically from the tradition itself. This study has been conducted through a holistic approach and by employing a descriptive–analytical methodology. In this manner, by describing the underlying structures and addressing all relevant details, the indicators of traditional art were extracted and analyzed from within the sources and concepts under examination—sources that have sometimes addressed these indicators only indirectly—while fully considering their contextual frameworks. This process involves identifying the rules and principles that Muslim thinkers have articulated through their reflections on crafts and artistic practices. The intrinsic and esoteric dimensions of traditional art indicators—those pertaining to inner realities, metaphysical aspects, wisdom-oriented foundations, qualitative, conceptual, intangible, and virtue-based values—include: Futuwwa treatises, ethical principles, adherence to manners and propriety, manuscripts, biographical texts, legal and judicial documents (such as marriage contracts), gravestones, literature, poetry, mysticism, symbolism, and spiritual archetypes of Islamic culture; as well as oral traditions such as myths and legends, proverbs, narratives, statements of transmitters, the conduct of spiritual masters, mentors, elders of communities and indigenous groups, teachers and apprentices, and even ordinary people; along with guilds and professions, socio-historical context, the spirit of the times, eras, geographical settings, dynasties and rulers, and social hierarchies—all of which were thoroughly examined. Likewise, the external, quantitative, formal, and tangible dimensions of traditional art indicators were also analyzed. These include the visual and physical aspects of artworks: formal qualities, the outward and corporeal realms, aesthetic properties, form, shape, color, structure, method, school and style, technical skill, technique, tools and materials, qualitative geometry, and recurring design patterns (such as calligraphic letterforms, vegetal motifs, arabesques, and khata’i patterns). Nevertheless, even formal aspects must convey symbolic reflections of higher metaphysical realms, such that the artwork serves as a sign or manifestation of those spiritual dimensions. Collectively, these indicators are employed within traditional art for the evaluation and interpretation of artistic works. The distinctive perspective of Muslims regarding crafts, trades, and artistic practices has generated a trajectory of artistic production that does not stem from the experiences of the Enlightenment in the West. Rather, in this trajectory, the focus is placed on the perfection of the human being and the pursuit of ultimate existential completion. Therefore, art—similar to other endeavors and actions of the Muslim individual—is regarded as a path leading toward the attainment of human perfection. For future research, it is recommended that such discussions be addressed in a more comprehensive and structured manner, in order to overcome the fragmented treatment of standards and criteria across various sources. Whereas in the West there exists a cohesive system of classification regarding Western art, a similarly comprehensive framework for the traditional arts of Iran has not yet been fully established.