Pigments play a crucial role in identifying the authenticity of historical and cultural artworks and hold a special position in conservation and restoration practices. Among them, recognizing the methods of identifying pigments used in historical manuscripts plays a significant role in determining the identity and authenticity of these artifacts. This study aims to review various methods of identifying pigments employed in historical manuscripts. Investigations in this paper have been conducted using non-destructive analytical techniques such as Scanning Electron
Microscope with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), micro-Raman spectroscopy, and optical imaging for elemental and compositional identification of pigments. Among these methods, SEM-EDX and point analysis
have been more commonly used in identifying historical pigments. Additionally, the combination of multiple techniques can be a suitable solution for identification purposes, but depending on the purpose of identification and the sensitivity of the artifact, factors such as the feasibility of on-site analysis or transferring artifacts to various laboratory facilities, using non-destructive methods, the possibility of sampling, and the significance and value of the artifact should be considered to adopt the best possible method. If necessary, combining tests and instrumental methods can lead to a more accurate understanding of pigments alongside their chemical composition.
This study focuses on the techno-functional analysis, preservation and restoration of a silk textile attributed to the Safavid period, belonging to a private collection in Tabriz. This research aimed to implement appropriate conservation measures and restoration based on the condition of the work for its display and preservation. The findings indicate that, through technical and comparative studies with several similar specimens, the artifact is likely from the Safavid era. The fabric exhibits various forms of degradation, including loss of warp and revealing of weft threads,perforation, tearing, holes, stains, and surface dirt. Conservation procedures applied to the textile included washing with sodium lauryl sulfate, consolidating the fibers, and reattachment of detached fibers using a thin film prepared by Klosel-G and backing support for the fabric. Finally, the textile was placed on a wooden frame for further preservation and display.