Danesh
Hefazat va Maremat
Volume 7, Issue 3 (11-2024)
KCR 2024, 7(3): 1-15 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kalantari S, Baghbanan A. Research Paper
Using Micro-Drilling as A Minimally Invasive Method in Examining the Condition of Historical Buildings. KCR 2024; 7 (3) :1-15
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-220-en.html
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/kcr/article-1-220-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Mining Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Branch of Maragheh. Iran.
Abstract: (1957 Views)
To estimate the strength parameters of materials such as concrete and rock, the micro-drilling technique can be used to quantitatively and qualitatively check the comparative strength of historical monuments and to qualitatively evaluate various building materials in depth and in situ. This technique can be used as a relatively minimally invasive, non-destructive, fast and reliable method in the field of restoration and treatment of historical monuments. In this method, by drilling in millimeter dimensions of the building surface and simultaneously measuring various drilling parameters such as thrust force, torque, penetration rate and bit rotation speed, it is possible to assess the deep condition of historical monuments in terms of the amount of erosion and weathering caused by various climatic and environmental factors. There is also an examination of the quality of treatment before and after treatment. However, various studies as drilling resistance in other countries, it has not been used in our country yet. Now that the construction of this type of equipment has become more capable in the country, we can also benefit from this system in the field of restoration and treatment of historical monuments. Simultaneous measurement of several drilling parameters and use of its data can provide additional relative advantages, including controlling the effect of bit wear in this technique. Therefore, we have provided this possibility by constructing and developing a device with this capability. Using this technique to measure drilling resistance is affected by bit wear. In this paper, we will introduce this technique, present a method for estimating reliable and comparable drilling resistance, and assess the principles of using the method in this regard.
Type of Study: Research, Original, Regular |
Subject:
Application of modern sciences, technologies, equipment, materials and methods
Received: 2024/07/28 | Accepted: 2024/11/15 | Published: 2024/11/30
Received: 2024/07/28 | Accepted: 2024/11/15 | Published: 2024/11/30
References
1. Bingham M. G. (1964). How Rock Properties Are Related to Drilling. Oil & Gas Journal, 94-101.
2. Burgess T. M., & Less W. G. (1985). Measuring The Wear of Milled Tooth Bits Using MWD Torque And Weight-on-Bit. Drilling Conference (pp. 453–462). New Orleans: SPE/IADC 13475.
3. Chiaia B., Brunetto M. B., & Carpinteri A. (2013). Mathmatical Modeling of the Mechanics of Core Drilling in Geomaterials. Machining Science and Technology(1-25). DOI:10.1080/10910344.2012.747881.
4. Costa D., Magalhães A., & Veiga R. (2012). Characterization of Mortars Using DRMS: Tests on Field Panels Samples. LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal:HMC.
5. Del Monte E., & Vignoli A. (1-2 Settembr 2008). In situ mechanical characterization of the mortar in masonry buildings with DRMS. SACoMaTiS 2008 International RILEM Conference. Como Lake – Italy.
6. Delgado Rodrigues J., & Costa D. (2004). A New Method for Data Correction in Drill Resistance Tests for the Effect of Drill Bit Wear. International Journal for Restoration, 10, 1 –18.
7. Detournay E., & Defourny E. (1992). A Phenomenological Modle for the Drilling Action of Drag Bits. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 13-23.
8. Felicctti R. (2006). The Drilling Resistane Test For The Assessment of Fire Damaged Concrete. Cement & Concrete Composites, 321-329.
9. Fratini F., Rescic S., & Tiano P. (2006). A New Portable System for Determining the State of Conservation of Monumental Stones. Materials and Structures(139–147(. DOI 10.1617/s11527-005-9013-8.
10. Gerbaud L., Menand S., & Sellami, H. (2006). PDC Bits: All Comes From the Cutter Rock Interaction. the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held in Miami, 21–23 February. Florida, U.S.A.:SPE.
11. Hareland G., (2010).“A drilling rate model for roller cone bits and its application”, Presented at CPS/SPE International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition in China Held in Beijing, China,8-10.
12. Hoberock L. L., & Bratcher G. J. (1996). A New Approach for Determining In-Situ Rock Strength While Drilling. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 118, 249-255.
13. Kalantari S. Hashemalhosseini H. & Baghbanan A. (2018)” Estimating Rock Strength Parameters Using Drilling Data” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, vol. 104,pp. 45-52.
14. Kalantari S., Baghbanan A & Hashemalhosseini H. (2019)” An analytical model for estimating rock strength parameters from smallscale drilling data”, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 135-145.
15. Karasawa H., Ohno T., Kosugi M., & Rowley J. C. (2002). Methods to Estimate the Rock Strength and Tooth Wear While Drilling With Roller-Bit Part 2 Insert Bits. Journal of Energy Resources Technology(133-139).DOI:10.1115/1.1482406#.
16. Karasawa H., Ohno T., Kosugi M., & Rowley J. C. (2002). Methods to Estimate the Rock Strength and Tooth Wear While Drilling With Roller-Bits Part 1Milled-Tooth Bits. Journal of Energy Resources Technology(125-131). DOI:10.1115/1.1482405#.
17. Li Z., & Itakura K.-i. (2012). An Analytical Drilling Model of Drag Bits for Evaluation of Rock Strength. The Japanese Geotechnical Society Soils and Foundations(216–227). doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2012.02.002).
18. Nakajima I., & Kinoshita S. (1979). Theoretical Studies on Cutting Force of Rock Fracture Mechanism in Rock Cutting. Journal of the Mining and Metallurgical Institute of Japan , 49-55.
19. Ohno T., Karasawa H., Kosugi M., & Rowley, J. C. (2004). Proposed Practical Methods to Estimate Rock Strength and Tooth Wear While Drilling With Roller-Cone Bits. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 302-310.
20. Pamplona M., Kocher M., Snethlage R.,& Barros L. A. (2007). Drilling Resistance: Overview and Outlook. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, D-70176, 158: 665–676.
21. Pessier R.C., J., & Fear M. (1992). Quantifying Common Drilling Problems With Mechanical Specific Energy and a Bit-Specific Coefficient of Sliding Friction. 67th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SOciety of Petroleum Engineers (pp. 373-388). Washington:SPE.
22. Teale R. (1965). The Concept of Specific Energy in Rock Drilling. Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci, 57-73.
23. Tiano P., & Rescic S. (2004). New Diagnostic Tools For In-situ Evaluation of Conservative Treatments For Monumental Stones. EAS Conference, November 15 - 18. Somerset: NJ.
24. Valentini E., Benincasa A., Tiano P., Fratini F., & Rescic S. (2008). On Site Drilling Resistance Profiles of Natural Stones. Italy: SINT Technology s.r.l.
25. Warren T. M. (1987). Penetration Rate Performance of Roller Cone Bits. SPE Drilling Engineering, 9-18.
26. Wojtanowicz A. K., & Kuru E. (1993). Mathematical Modeling of PDC Bit Drilling Process Based On a Single-Cutter Mechanics. (Vol. 115 – 247). Journal of Energy Resources Technology, (115). doi:10.1115/1.2906429.
27. Wolcott D.S. R., & Bordelon D. (1993). Lithology Determination Using Downhole Bit Mechanics Data. 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers (pp. 769-778). Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |