[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: year 2, Issue 4 (9-2018) ::
Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2018, 2(4): 23-40 Back to browse issues page
The Newfound Evidence of the Oldest Remains of Architecture of Chalcolithic Period in Kurdistan Province (Based on Archaeological Excavations)
Mahnaz Sharifi1, Abbas Motarjem 2
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology Islamic Period, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Archaeology, Bu-Ali Sina University. , amotarjem@gmail.com
Abstract:   (6036 Views)
Abstract
Archaeological excavations Tepe Gheshlagh have been helpful in understanding Chalcolithic sites in the high region separating the East Central Zagros and the Southern Lake Urmia Basin. Though cultural interface between the two regions was alluded to in the earlier publications, nothing was known of the existence of intermediate sites between them. Tepe Gheshlagh is a site at the center of Talvar valley that as a natural corridor serves to bring the concerned regions into closer contact, and its archaeological data will contribute to reconstruction of interactions of the regions in the Chalcolithic period. The Tepe Gheshlagh is one of the few settlements of the ancient villagers in the Talvar valley of the Bijar City, dating back to the fifth millennium BC (Ancient, Middle, and Late Chalcolithic period) which according to the Thermoluminescence tests it has been settlement form 5500 BC to 3600 BC without any interruption. Performing three seasons of archaeological excavations in this site provides us valuable information about the cultural and archaeological conditions of the region. This site have around one hectare, and during the settlement is formed ancient deposit more than 14 meters.
Keywords: Tepe Gheshlagh, Village Period, Architecture of Fifth Millennium BC, Native Material.

Introduction
Excavations Tepe Gheshlagh have over 14 meters of deposits from different phases of the Chalcolithic period at the site, which consists of a sequence of five periods that begins with the characteristic Dalma material at the lowermost and ends with the Godin VI/VII type material at the uppermost deposit that marks the later phase of the Late Chalcolithic period. After Bronze Age material and after a cultural gap is appeared Iron III. Thus, we deal here with an almost uninterrupted sequence in the Central Zagros spanning almost two millennia. Results from the three seasons of excavations have furnished a clear picture of the Chalcolithic architecture (settlement sequence and other cultural material extending from the Dalma period up to the end of Godin VI). Excavated data from Tepe Gheshlagh is show connections between the Northwest Iranian cultures (Dalma tradition) and Central ZagrosThis is certainly due to the strategic location of the region in a natural pass that has mediated interactions between the two regions. Through cultural studies of the archaeological site of Gheshlagh in Talvar in Kurdistan province, regarded as the regional key site and a major settlement from the Chalcolithic period with clear evidence of Dalma traditions, this study will attempts to illustrate origin and development of the Dalma culture in the region and study evolution in the eastern Central Zagros hinterlands. Also, the cultural developments that took place in these hinterlands will be elucidated and the role of Gheshlagh as a key settlement site in this regard will be determined and the trend of the economic, social and cultural changes of the site’s inhabitants over time will be explained in light of archaeological data. In this context, absolute dates of ceramics would greatly facilitate the precise identification of the strata through providing a chronology for the region. 

Goals of Tepe Gheshlagh
One of the major goals of the present work is define the nature of the cultural ties between the early village settlements of the eastern Central Zagros hinterlands and the neighboring regions. There are indications that clearly prove the interactions. We may consider two approaches to the problem. The first is in light of indirect interactions, which including: (1) the material that may have entered the region as raw material or finished products, which are certainly of nonlocal origin; (2) inspirations from Hasuna tradition in the form of Hasuna-like pottery types, ceramics decorated with applied scales characteristic of Umm Dabaghiya, and abstract motifs of the Halaf period such as sun motif. The second builds on direct interactions: there are indications that reveal direct interface of Tepe Gheshlagh with the Southern Mesopotamia and Susiana plain. One of the clay seals is with impression of a stamp seal, it was made from the local materials of area. Other one of the findings is discovery of at least two unique sherds that obviously belong to the Ubaid period. The intrusion of Ubaid period material to Iran is known from Gawra XIII contemporary to the Chalcolithic period, and T. Cuyler Young and Levine’s observations during their surveys of the Eastern Central Zagros indicate the strong presence of Ubaid material culture, represented for instance by Dalma-Ubaid ware. The third indication is a quasi-cylindrical seal attesting to the transition from stamp to cylindrical seals, though technically it is a cylindrical seal not a stamp one. Similar trend is as yet unreported from any other region. 

Conclusion
Tepe Gheshlagh is located in the highland region between northwest and central Zagros in the current boundary of Bijar City. In terms of biological sequences, 5 periods of the settlements and 7 architectural phases of the Chalcolithic period were identified in this site. The archaeological evidence of the ancient village of the Tepe Gheshlagh indicated that the architectural texture in terms of physically consists of small central chambers overlooking the central courtyard, which due to the movable findings; it is possible to identify their function, such as kitchen, warehouse, and living space. In terms of architectural form, the spaces are often right-angled, and entirely are made of native and local materials, including mold brick and stratum, whereas the thickness of the main walls in relation to the dividing walls are Maximum twice, and the thickness of most of them are between 40 and 55 cm, and often in the first ridge used a one row of stones as foundation of the building. But the small walls from the beginning have been made with stratum. The main entrances are mainly to the Southwest (sunshiny). The fastening method is used for connecting the walls in the corners, and in the remaining height of the buildings, there is no sign of tension and cracks caused by the difference in load occurrence in the corners.
Keywords: Tepe Gheshlagh, Village Period, Architecture of Fifth Millennium BC, Native Material.
Full-Text [PDF 2173 kb]   (910 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special Archeology
Received: 2018/12/7 | Accepted: 2018/12/7 | Published: 2018/12/7
References
1. - افتخارنژاد، ج. (1359). «تفکیک بخش‌های مختلف ایران از نظر وضع ساختمانی در ارتباط با حوضه‌های رسوبی». مجلۀ انجمن نفت. شمارۀ 82، صص: 28-19.
2. - الیاده، میرچاه (1372). رساله در تاریخ ادیان. ترجمۀ جلال ستاری. چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات سروش.
3. - شریفی،مهناز (1394). «بررسی روند تغییرات فرهنگی دورۀ مس و سنگ در کرانه‌های شرق زاگرس‌مرکزی بر اساس کاوش‌های قشلاق». رسالۀ دکتری باستان‌شناسی (منتشر نشده).
4. - موچشی، امیر‌ساعد؛ نیکنامی، کمال‌الدین؛ مشکور، مرجان؛ فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن؛ و فیروزمندی‌شیره‌جین، بهمن (1390). «گاهنگاری نسبی و مطلق تپه‌کلنان بیجار». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، دورۀ 1، شمارۀ 1. پاییز 1390.صص: 56-31.
5. - گیرشمن، رومن (1379). سیلک کاشان. ترجمۀ اصغر کریمی، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
6. - مترجم، عباس (1390). «گزارش کاوش فصل اول قشلاق»، تهران: پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی (گزارش منتشرنشده).
7. - مترجم، عباس (1392). «گزارش فصل دوم کاوش قشلاق»، تهران: پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی (گزارش منتشرنشده).
8. - مترجم، عباس (1393). «گزارش فصل سوم کاوش قشلاق»، تهران: پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی (گزارش منتشرنشده).
9. - مترجم، عباس و شریفی، مهناز (1393). «تحلیلی بر کارکرد و ماهیت نماد‌کالاها و پیکرک‌های گلی قشلاق». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران. دورۀ 4، شمارۀ 7. پاییز و زمستان 1393. صص: 46-27.
10. - مترجم، عباس و شریفی، مهناز (1397). «فرآیند گذار از سنت‌های فرهنگی نوسنگی جدید به مس‌سنگی قدیم در پسکرانه‌های شرق زاگرس مرکزی، پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، دورۀ هشتم. شمارۀ 16. بهار 1397. صص: 101-83.
11. - هنریکسون، رابرت (1381). «گاهنگاری غرب مرکز ایران». در: باستان‌شناسی غرب ایران. به‌کوشش: فرانک هول. ترجمۀ زهرا باستی، تهران: انتشارات سمت: صص: 430-405.
13. - Abu al Soof, Behnam. (1968). “Tell Es-sawwan excavation of the fourth season”. Sumer. Vol XXIV. pp: 3-15.
14. - Bader, N, O. (1993). “Tell Maghzaliyah, an Early Neolithic site in Northern Iraq”. Early stages in the evolution of Mesopotamian civilization: Soviet excavations in northern Iraq, edited by Norman Yoffee and Jeffrey J. Clark Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1993. 7- 40 .
15. - Braidwood, R.; Howe, B & Read, R. (1961). “The Iranian prehistoric project”.Science. 133.
16. - Braidwood, L.; Braidwood, R.; Charles, R. & Patty Watson. (1983). Prehistoric Archaeology along the Zagros flanks. The University of Chicago oriental institute Publication No 105.
17. - Dayson, R. (1967). “Early cultures of Solduz Azerbaijan, A survey of Persian Art”, Vol XIV Proceeding of the IV, International Congress of Iranian Art and Archaeology, pp: 261-297.
18. - Dayson, R. (1968), “Hasanlu and the Solduz and ushno valleys Twelve years of exploration”. Archaeologia viva vol I .pp: 83-90.
19. - Dyson, Jr. R. H. & Young, C. T. Jr. (1960).”The Solduz Valley, Iran: Pisdeli Tepe “ Antiquity 34: 19-28.
20. - Gurdil, B. (2005). Architecture and social complexity in the Late Ubaid period:A study of the Built Environment Degirmentepe in East IRAN Anatolia, University of California, Los Angeles.
21. - Hamlin, C. (1975). “Dalma Tepe”, Iran. Vol. 13. pp:111-127.
22. - Kingery, W.; David, P.; Vandiver B. & Martha P. (1988). “Production and Use of Lime and Gypsum Plaster in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic Near East”. Journal of Field Archaeology, Volume 15. Issue 2.
23. - Kozlowski, J. K. A. (1990). “multi-Aspectual approach to the origins of the upper palaeolithic in Europe”. The emergence of Modern Humans an Archaeological perspective, Edinburgh university: 419-437.
24. - Lloyd, S.; Safar, F. & Braidwood, R. J. (1945). “Tell Hassuna Excavations by the Iraq”. Government Directorate General of Antiquities in 1943 and 1944. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 4, No. 4: 255-289.
25. - Majidzadeh, Y. (1981). “Sialk III and the Pottery Sequence at Tepe Ghabristan: the Coherence of the Cultures of the Central Plateau”. IRAN, 19. pp: 141–146.
26. - Matthews, R.; Matthews, W. & Mohammadifar Y. (2013). The Earliest Neolithic of Iran, Excavations at Sheikh-E Abad and Jani, Published by: Oxbow Booksvol I.
27. - MCDonald, M. (1979). An Examination of Mid-Holocene settlements patterns in the Central Zagros ,Region of Western Iran. Department of Antropology University of Toronto.
28. - Mellaart, J. (1967). Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. McGraw-Hill, New York.
29. - Motarjem, A. & Sharifi, M. (2014). “The Cultural Development of Chalcolithic era in the East of Central Zagros based on Archaeological Excavations at Tepe Gheshlagh in Bijar, Kurdistan Province”. Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies: Volume 4, Issue 1. pp: 49-65.
30. - Smith, E. L. P. (1990). “Architectural Innovation and Experimentation at Ganj Dareh, Iran”. World Archaeology, Vol. 21, No. 3. pp: 323-335.
31. - Swiny, S. (1975). ”Survey in North-West Iran, 1971“. East and West 25(2): 77-98.
32. - Van Ziest, W & Bottema, S. (1991). Late Quaternary Vegetation of The Near East. Beiheftezum Tubinger Atlas, des vorderen Orients, Reihe . A (Naturwissenchaften) Nr 18, Reichert, Wiesbaden.
33. - Voight, M. M. (1983). Haji Firuz Tepe, Iran: The Neolithic Settlement. The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.
34. - Wasylikowa, A. (2006). Palaeolimnology of Lake Zeribar, Iran, and its climatic implications. Krystyna Andrzej Witkowski b, Adam Walanus c, Andrzej Hutorowicz d.
35. - Watkins ,T. (1995). Qermez Dere, tell Afar Interim report, No 3, Edinburgh.
36. - Young ,T. C. & Levine, L. (1974). Excavation of the Godin Project: Second progress Report Occasional Papers no:26 Art and Archaeology. Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sharifi M, Motarjem A. The Newfound Evidence of the Oldest Remains of Architecture of Chalcolithic Period in Kurdistan Province (Based on Archaeological Excavations). Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 2018; 2 (4) :23-40
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-88-en.html


year 2, Issue 4 (9-2018) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه مطالعات باستان شناسی پارسه Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.22 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4286