Tapeh Giyan in Western Iran, which is well known to the archaeological academia, is one of the most important prehistoric mounds in Central Zagros which has always been noticed by both Iranian and foreign archaeologists. The last season of field works at Tapeh Giyan was done under Ali Khaksar in the spring and summer of 2012 in order to determine its boundaries. For this purpose, 27 test pits were dug all over the mound, and in trench no. 12, a distinctive burial was discovered. Since none of the 122 graves excavated by the French expedition over the years 1931 and 1932 were documented, the excavation continued on this newfound grave; it was entitled no. 123. Its burial’s corpse’s position is a combination of bent and supine position, and its mouth is abnormally wide open; also, there are 19 funerary objects buried with it. In the present study, we are going to discuss the very unique burial position of this grave together with its historic and comparative aspects.
Keywords: Iran, Central Zagros, Tapeh Giyan, Burial, Bronze Age.
Tapeh Giyan is a well-known archaeological site located 12 km from the west of Nahavand and 70 km from the south of Hamadan city, in the marginal parts of a small town with the same name. As it was mentioned above Tapeh Giyan is situated in the Northern peripheral parts of the town, and it meets residential units in the south. This mound is 350 m long and 150 m wide, and it is also 17 m higher than the surface of the adjacent lands. Lastly, the average height of the mound is 1600 m above the sea level. This archaeological site was excavated by French archaeologists (Contenau and Ghirshman) over the years 1931-1932 and its results were published in 1935. Giyan became less important till it was once again excavated in 27 test pits in 2012 in a research program for delimitating the mound and determining its boundaries. In the course of conducting this research program, the true area of the mound was determined. The mound spreads towards the south, east and also southeast, and it continues to the beds beneath streets and houses; this was confirmed by an in-situ burial located in the outer parts of mound’s boundaries dating back to the middle Bronze Age. The burial was to excavated and studied owing to the fact that the other 122 burials were not completely/fully documented by the French expedition.
Tapeh Giyan is one of the most prominent archaeological sites in Central Zagros from which artifacts from 5th to 1st millennia have been reported in the course of archaeological excavations. This mound’s excavations could undoubtedly bridge the gap between non-scientific/unsystematic and scientific/systematic archaeological excavations in Iran. At that time, the system of stratigraphy (was not interpreted in the same way) it does now, and what was regarded really important during excavation was finding the origin of a particular pottery from the region of Giyan as well as the bronze artifacts of Lurestan. Considering the fact that most information about Tapeh Giyan has been yielded from its burials, it cannot be reliable enough from the stratigraphic point of view; however, it’s been about 50 years that the chronology covering mid-3rd millennium to 2nd millennium B.C.E. in western Iran has been established based on Tapeh Giyan’s excavations.
Overall, 122 graves have been excavated in scattered spots of Tapeh Giyan at different depths during the previous excavations at Giyan. 119 graves in the depth of 9.5 m. from the mound’s surface, and 3 graves in depths of 11.5, 13 and 14; one in each, have been dug. These graves are in form of simple elliptical pits in the ground. The children’s skeletons have been buried in almost large jars. The corpse body and skeleton have been bent and it seems that this position pattern had not been obligatory. In the course of this season’s excavation, an accompanied burial was found in test pit number 12 in the depth of 200 cm from the mound surface. In this grave, 19 objects have also been found together with the skeleton; this assemblage of objects includes: 6 ceramic pots, 4 bronze pots, 1 bronze spear, 1 bone object, 2 bronze earrings, 2 bronze rings which were joint to the jaws, 1 metal ore-like blade, and 2 bronze rings on elbow bones. These objects which are considered funerary objects and grave gifts were mostly put above skeleton’s head and at the same level with the skeleton. As we know, the funerary objects represent both functional and ritual importance in burying traditions, and the funerary objects in this newfound grave constitute majorly potsherds.
The notable point about this burial is the skeleton’s position pattern; this skeleton’s upper part along with its pelvis is both in a complete supine position, and its mouth is unnaturally open. Considering the existence of two bronze rings at the joint of the upper and the lower jaws (mandible and maxilla), we could conclude that some changes have been exerted on the primary status of the burial. The jaw bone and the teeth are completely sound except for the premolars which have traces of wearing on them; all this makes us presume that this person would do an activity with them when he had been alive. His legs are tucked in toward his stomach on the right side of his pelvis. The toes and ankles of his both legs were below the right side of pelvis, and the pelvis itself had been dislocated after burial due to external pressures. The bone of left leg’s femur was located on the pelvis, and the femur’s head had been situated on the right hand’s elbow as well.
According to the paleoanthropological studies, this skeleton belongs to a hefty man aging 35- 40 years old. This skeleton, despite being almost well-preserved, bears some evidence which indicates a number of changes applied in the primary burial including lack of some hand and foot phalanges as well as the existence of the rings put on the two papillae on the lower jaw joint. It is highly likely that these rings have caused the mouth to remain open, which could imply sort of burial tradition. According to Ghrishman’s excavations in 1933 and 1934 in the Tapeh Giyan, the earrings have been among the funerary objects of men. In addition, the rings couldn’t be earrings in that in addition to the rings, there are two earrings in the grave. Because of the abundant muscles and vessels existed between upper and lower jaws, the rings could not be placed there in a living human. Therefore, the rings must have been placed in these places after death intentionally. Furthermore, the symmetrical position of the rings in the two papillae on the lower jaw joint, the impossibility of putting and removing the rings easily in this place and also having no evidence of the natural post- depositional processes, in other cases such as earrings, and the object place on the collar bone, are the reason for rejecting the natural post-depositional processes and accidental disturbance. Ceramic wares constitute the majority of the gifts. These wares are all morphologically typified as Giyan (IV, III) and Godin types which all date back to mid-third millennium through late- second millennium B.C.E. Existence of metal objects in this grave and studying the type of bronze alloy utilized in these objects’ structures shows that the method and technique used in producing these dishes and pots has been lost wax method, and beside that hammering has been applied in making the other metal objects. Finally, on the basis of the historic-comparative studies, and also with considering the chronology of prehistoric cultures at Tapeh Giyan, we can infer that this burial belongs to (middle) Bronze Age and dates back to a period of time from 2500 to 2000 B.C.E.
1. - خاکسار، علی (1390). «گزارش گمانهزنی بهمنظور تعیین عرصه و پیشنهاد حریم تپهگیان نهاوند». میراثفرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع دستی استان همدان (منتشرنشده).
2. - دارک، کن، آر (1387). مبانی نظری باستانشناسی. ترجمۀ کامیار عبدی، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
3. - دانی، الف، ح (1375). «قبایل دامدار-کشاورز پاکستان در دورۀ پس از سند». تاریخ تمدنهای آسیای مرکزی. بخش دوم از جلد اول. ترجمۀ صادق ملکشهمیرزادی، تهران: وزرارت امور خارجه. صص: 274-235.
4. - سیدسجادی، سیدمنصور؛ و سامانی، نورعلی (1387). «گزارش یک فصل کاوش در تپه نورآباد لرستان». باستانشناسی و هنر ایران، 32 مقاله در بزرگداشت عزتالله نگهبان. بهکوشش: عباس علیزاده، یوسف مجیدزاده و صادق ملکشهمیرزادی، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی. صص: 130-85.
5. - طلایی، حسن (1381). «سنتها و شیوههای تدفین در عصرآهن (حدود800-1450ق.م.)». مجلۀ دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه تهران. شمارههای 162 و 163. صص: 192-173.
6. - طلایی، حسن (1385). باستانشناسی و هنر ایران در هزارۀ اول قبل از میلاد. چاپ چهارم، تهران: سمت.
7. - طلایی، حسن (1387). عصرآهن ایران، تهران: سمت.
8. - گاراژیان، عمران؛ عادلی، جلال؛ و پاپلییزدی، لیلا (1384). «الگویی استقراری در دشت خاوه و منطقۀ میربگ زاگرسمرکزی براساس بررسی باستانشناختی منطقه». پیام باستانشناس. سال دوم، شمارۀ 4. صص: 59-21.
9. - محمدیفر، یعقوب (1379). «نگاهی دیگر به کاوشهای باستانشناسی تپهگیان نهاوند». فرهنگ همدان. سال پنجم. شمارۀ 19 و 20. صص: 17-6.
11. - Contenau. G. & Ghrishman. R. (1935). Fouilles De Tepe Giyan Pers De Nehavand, Paris.
12. - Hemati Azandaryani, E. & Khaksar, A. (2013). “A newly-found diagnostic Bronze-Age Burial from Tapeh Giyan, Nahavand, Iran”. J. Archeology of SAP, 2(3). pp: 47-51.
13. - Redman, C. L., Curtin, Versaggi, & Wanser, (1978). “Social Archaeology: The Future of the Past”. Social Archaeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating, C. L. Redman et al., editors. Academic Press, New York. Pp: 1-18.