[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: year 5, Issue 18 (3-2022) ::
Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2022, 5(18): 179-201 Back to browse issues page
A Study of Physical-Semantic Evolution of “Fakhr and Madin” in Tomb Buildings Left Over from the Islamic Period (Comparative Study of Ilkhanid, Timurid and Safavid Periods)
Azita Belali Oskoyi1, Atefeh Sedaghati 2, Parisa Hasan Khoshbakht3, Sanam Kafshdooz Salimi3
1- Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Arts, Bojnourd University, Bojnourd, Iran. , a.sedaghati@ub.ac.ir
3- Master Student of the Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract:   (507 Views)
Fakhr and Madin are the networks inside the fence and religious places that are repeated in the form of grids. Such walls are made with pieces of baked clay in geometric and non-geometric shapes, and because holes have appeared between them, they have tried to make their form beautiful as well. In the Islamic era of Iran, mausoleums and tombs after mosques are among the most important works of architecture and urban planning. The construction of this building began in the fourth century AH and continues with ups and downs until the Safavid era. According to the surviving works, the Ilkhanate period in Iran can be considered as the peak period of the popularity and prosperity of the construction of “Fakhr and Medin” in tomb buildings. In this article, a number of tomb buildings from the Ilkhanid, Timurid and Safavid eras are comparatively studied. The paper follows the main question of what evolution Fakhr and Madin have undergone in the Islamic period with emphasis on the three mentioned periods, and how its application can be explained and traced in comparison? This research is a combination of two types of qualitative and quantitative research methods and descriptive-analytical method based on logical reasoning. Data collection was done through library study and valid historical documents and review of images and documentation centers. In this regard, first, the historical background and theoretical foundations of the topic have been examined. Then, all the types of Fakhr and Madin in the tombs of the three Ilkhanid, Timurid and Safavid periods (a total of 25 case studies) have been analyzed according to the geometric patterns, location and materials used in their construction. The result of a comparative study shows that “Fakhr and Madin” has been compiled in the form of seven physical-semantic indicators. These characteristics include: spirituality, transparency, environmental comfort, security, visual interaction, privacy and beauty, and it was found that in the Ilkhanate period, the characteristics of “spirituality” and “visual interaction”, in the Timurid period, the characteristics of “environmental comfort” and “Visual interaction” and in the Safavid period, the characteristics of “spirituality” and “environmental comfort” have been emphasized.. 
Keywords: Fakhr and Madin, Tomb, Ilkhani, Teymouri, Safavid.
Iranians have always revered their dead throughout history, but this reverence has never been for the deity of beings, either before Islam or after Islam. This attention and respect can be considered as a mixture of theology and fear of death and love and affection for parents and ancestors, which has never reached the stage of worshiping the dead.
In the Islamic era of Iran, the tomb, with the exception of the mosque, has received more public attention than any other type of architecture, so that in few cities there is no share of such buildings. On the other hand, assuming the obvious connection of many architectural and urban works of early Islamic Iran with pre-Islamic heritage, it is worth emphasizing that in pre-Islamic times, with the exception of the magnificent tomb of Cyrus, there are no important signs of tombs that were built independently. 
Tomb buildings from the fourth century AH, after both religious and non-religious in Islamic architecture and urban planning in Iran, have opened their place, with the difference that the buildings are part of the religious group and mostly Shiite tombs and holy shrines have been given special attention in terms of sanctity and have been renovated over the years. But the non-religious tombs, which include the tombs of the rulers, princes and elders of the country, have not been given much importance and most of them have suffered various injuries or changes over time or have changed their nature and have become religious tombs and buildings. In this article, in line with the above, it has been tried to study and explore the architectural-urban works of the Islamic period (tombs and mausoleum) with emphasis on the three periods of Ilkhanids, Timurids and Safavids, and in particular “Fakhr and Madin” in these tombs should be analyzed.

Comparative Study: The position of “Fakhr and Madin” in the Ilkhanid, Timurid and Safavid Periods
This type of bricklaying (Fakhr and Madin) with its lattice module which is composed of regular and sometimes irregular geometric shapes, in the case of gardens, in order to illuminate and clarify the building, play with light and shadow, pay attention to the issue of privacy and prevent the view of the object directly and from the inside, be safe and secure, was actually used. This porosity in the garden fence in addition to creating vision and perspective into the garden and visual interaction with the internal environment, with shadows and stylized space, with the weakening of the light intensity for pedestrians providing a favorable path, causing its lattice body. 
In this section, the tombs of the Islamic period are studied with emphasis on the status of Fakhr and Madin. As mentioned earlier, Fakhr and Madin has been one of the elements of Iranian indigenous architecture, which has a special place in various types of Iranian architecture. Architects have used this technique to create shadows and lights for visual beauty as well as to attract attention to the building. The selection of 25 case studies of the tomb in the three periods of the Ilkhanids, Timurids and Safavids is the basis of a comparative study of this part of the study. The use of Fakhr and Madin dates back to the pre-Ilkhanate period, but due to the small use of this element, their study has been abandoned. At the same time, for example, the Nain Grand Mosque in the Albuyeh period and the Ardestan Grand Mosque in the Seljuk period have benefited from its pride and use. In the first case, Fakhr and Madin have been used as skylights and connectors for air conditioning, as well as in Patio. In the second case, Fakhr and Madin on the ground floor and the first floor, with the aim of visual interaction and shading, air conditioning and light transmission, have been considered.
In order to summarize the discussion and the possibility of comparing the results, Fakhr and Madin indicators (7 indicators) in 25 samples were presented comparatively in the form of a table and separately for the three periods studied.

The result of this comparative study shows that in the Ilkhanate period, Fakhr and Madin were used in different parts, including under the dome of the outer fence of the altar porch and the porch of the tombs. This course includes the most variety in the places used. Of course, the greatest benefit of Fakhr and Madin was identified under the dome and then in the walls around the compound. Therefore, it can be concluded that the most important subject of the Ilkhanate was “spirituality” and then “visual interaction”. This is while in the Timurid period, the most use of Fakhr and Madin was in the outer body and then in the porch, dome and lanai. So in this period, the most important topics are “environmental comfort” and “visual interaction”. In the Safavid period, Fakhr and Madin was used in the dome and the outer wall. In this period, “spirituality” and “environmental comfort” have been the most important characteristics used by Fakhr and Madin. On the other hand, according to the studies done, in the case of different types of tombs, the most use of Fakhr and Madin has been in individual tombs, although a mass tomb was also found during the Ilkhanid and Timurid periods (who used Fakhr and Madin). Also, the most varied form of Fakhr and Madin is under the domes and around the courtyards and fences, almost a fixed form of Fakhr and Madin has been used. As expected from the definitions of Fakhr and Madin, the most used materials were bricks. But other materials such as pottery and wood have also been used in its construction. Finally, the most important indicator used of pride and civility was “transparency” and then “environmental comfort” and in the next category “spirituality”, although it seems that in the collection of tombs, the indicator of “security” was considered and Special emphasis has been placed on it.
Keywords: Fakhr and Madin, Tomb, Ilkhani, Teymouri, Safavid.
Full-Text [PDF 1565 kb]   (105 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Interdisciplinary
Received: 2021/06/19 | Accepted: 2021/08/3 | Published: 2022/03/1
1. - اوغازیان، فرزانه، (1395). «بازخوانی الگو‌های هندسی عنصر شباک برمبنای بهینه‌سازی نور روز (نمونۀ موردی: طراحی ساختمان اداری شیشۀ قزوین در تهران)». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، رشتۀ مهندسی معماری، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس (منتشر نشده).
2. - بزرگمهری، زهره، (1390). آمودهای ایرانی (شناخت، آسیب‌شناسی و مرمت). تهران: انتشارات سروش دانش.
3. - بلر، شیلا؛ و بلوم، جاناتان، (1388). ه‍ن‍ر و م‍ع‍م‍اری‌ اس‍لام‍ی‌ (۲). ترجمۀ یعقوب آژند، چاپ سوم، ت‍ه‍ران‌: س‍ازم‍ان‌ م‍طال‍ع‍ه‌ و ت‍دوی‍ن‌ ک‍ت‍ب‌ ع‍ل‍وم‌‌ان‍س‍ان‍ی‌ دان‍ش‍گ‍اه‌ه‍ا (س‍م‍ت‌): ف‍ره‍ن‍گ‍س‍ت‍ان‌ ه‍ن‍ر ج‍م‍ه‍وری‌ اس‍لام‍ی‌ ایران‌.
4. - بمانیان، محمدرضا؛ و نیکودل، فهیمه، (1393). «بررسی انواع نورگیری و روش‌های تأمین نور در مساجد دورۀ قاجار تهران». پژوهش‌های معماری اسلامی، سال 1، شمارۀ 3، صص: 74-60.
5. - بهلولی‌نیری، بهزاد، (1390). «بررسی شیوه‌های معماری آرامگاهی از دورۀ ایلخانی تا عصر صفوی در استان اردبیل». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد باستان‌شناسی دورۀ اسلامی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی (منتشرنشده).
6. - پارسا، محمد‌علی، (1390). «خاستگاه‌های معماری پنجره جستاری در مفهوم پنجره در زبان فارسی و فرهنگ ایرانی». مجلۀ مسکن و محیط روستا، دورۀ 30، شمارۀ 134، صص: 94-75.
7. - پوپ، آرتور، (1393). معماری ایران. ترجمۀ غلامحسین صدری‌افشار، چاپ دهم، تهران: دات.
8. - پوگاچنکووا، آناتولیناگالینا، (1387). شاهکارهای معماری آسیای میانه. ترجمۀ سید‌داوود طبایی، تهران: انتشارات فرهنگستان هنر.
9. - پیرنیا، محمد‌کریم، (1378). آشنایی با معماری اسلامی ایران. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علم و صنعت.
10. - پیرنیا، محمد‌کریم، (1387). سبک‌شناسی معماری ایران. تهران: انتشارات سروش دانا.
11. - حسینی، سجاد؛ و پور‌کریمی، پرویز، (1395). «برج مقبره‌های مشابه با برج مقبرۀ شیخ صفی‌الدین اردبیلی از منظر تزئینات معماری». اردبیل: مجموعه مقالات همایش بین‌المللی معاصرسازی سنت‌های معماری اسلامی ایرانی.
12. - خاکپور، مینو، (1392). «گونه شناسی بقاع متبرکه لاهیجان». مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، شمارۀ 13، صص: 92-81.
13. - خواجه‌نوری، الهام؛ فلامکی، محمدمنصور؛ و کبودر‌آهنگی، مینا، (1396). «چگونگی‌های شکل‌گیری و تکامل آجر در معماری ایرانی». دوماهنامۀ نخبگان علوم و مهندسی، دورۀ 2، شمارۀ 2، صص: 235-202.
14. - رفایی، اشکان، (1390). «شکل‌گیری و نقش آرامگاه در معماری ایران در دوران اسلامی (قرن اول تا هفتم ه‍.ق.)». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، رشتۀ هنر، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان (منتشرنشده).
15. - شراهی، اسماعیل؛ و نیستانی، جواد؛ (1393). «بررسی باستان‌شناسی معماری آرامگاه‌های دورۀ صفوی تفرش، استان مرکزی». فصلنامۀ علمی تخصصی، باستان‌شناسی ایران. دورۀ 4، شمارۀ 1، صص: 106-83.
16. - غروی، مهدی، (1376). آرامگاه در گسترۀ فرهنگ ایرانی. تهران: انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی.
17. - کیانی، محمدیوسف، (1379). ت‍اری‍خ‌ ه‍ن‍ر م‍ع‍م‍اری‌ ای‍ران‌ در دورۀ‌ اس‍لام‍ی‌. چاپ سوم، تهران: سازم‍ان‌ م‍طال‍ع‍ه‌ و ت‍دوی‍ن‌ ک‍ت‍ب‌ ع‍ل‍وم‌‌ان‍س‍ان‍ی‌ دان‍ش‍گ‍اه‌ها (س‍م‍ت‌)‌‫‌.
18. - گدار، آندره، (1377). هنر ایران. ترجمۀ بهروز حبیبی، چاپ سوم، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه شهید‌بهشتی.
19. - گرابر، اولگ؛ هتستین، مارکوس؛ و دلیوس، پیتر، (1389). معماری اسلامی. ترجمۀ اکرم قیطاسی، تهران: شرکت انتشارات سوره مهر.
20. - گ‍لمبک‌، لیزا؛ و ویلبر، دونالد، (1374). معماری تیموری در ایران و توران. ترجمۀ محمد‌یوسف کیانی و کرامت‌الله افسر، تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی کشور.
21. - مسعودی‌اصل، بهزاد؛ احمدعلی، فرزین؛ جوادی، شهره؛ و براتی، ناصر، (1397). «مبانی معماری مقابر امام‌زادگان در ایران». باغ نظر، شمارۀ 64، صص: 14-5.
22. - مشبکی‌اصفهانی، علیرضا، (1397). «مقایسۀ تطبیقی معماری مقابر دورۀ سلجوقیان و ایلخانیان در شهرستان مراغه با نگرش کالبدی». دو ماهنامۀ علمی تخصصی پژوهش در هنر و علوم‌انسانی، سال 3، شمارۀ 2، صص: 11-1.
23. - منشی، اسکندر، (١٣٣٥). تاریخ عالم‌آرای عباسی. به‌کوشش: ایرج افشار، تهران: چاپخانۀ موسوی.
24. - مهدوی‌نژاد، محمد‌جواد؛ و مطور، سها، (1391). «کیفیت نورگیر‌ها در گنبد‌های ایرانی (با رویکرد به مسائل سازه‎ای گنبد)». نقش‌جهان - مطالعات نظری و فناوری‌های نوین معماری و شهرسازی، دورۀ 2، شمارۀ 2، صص: 42-31.
25. - میرمیران، سید‌هادی، (1374). «اصول معماری ایران». مجلۀ آبادی، دورۀ 5، شمارۀ 19، صص: 30-28.
26. - میرمیران، سید‌هادی، (۱۳۷۷). «سیری از ماده به روح». مجلۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دورۀ 6، شمارۀ 42 و 43، صص: 100-94.
27. - نژادابراهیمی، احد؛ و توران‌پور، محیا، (1397). «حس مکان در مساجد براساس مطالعۀ تطبیقی شکل و مکان ساخت فخرومدین در مساجد تاریخی»، پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، دورۀ 9، شمارۀ 20، صص: 182-165.
28. - نظری، سهیل؛ و بلخاری‌قهی، حسن؛ (1394). «بررسی ریشه‌های ایرانی معماری آرامگاهی هند در دورۀ سلاطین دهلی نمونۀ موردی مقبره صوفی رکنی عالم». مطالعات معماری ایران، شمارۀ 8، صص: 34-21.
29. - نعمت‌گرگانی، ام‌البنین، (۱۳۸۱). «پیشینۀ نور در معماری و وسایل روشنایی در هنر اسلامی ایران». مجلۀ اثر، شمارۀ ۳۵، صص: 323-316.
30. - وانگ، دیوید؛ و گروت، لیندا، (1389). روش‌های تحقیق در معماری. تهران: مؤسسۀ چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
31. - ویلبر، دونالد نیوتون، (1365). معماری اسلامی ایران در دورۀ ایلخانیان. ت‍رج‍م‍ۀ‌ ع‍ب‍دال‍ل‍ه‌ ف‍ری‍ار، تهران: وزارت‌ ف‍ره‍ن‍گ‌ و آم‍وزش‌ ع‍ال‍ی‌، ش‍رک‍ت‌ ان‍ت‍ش‍ارات‌ ع‍ل‍م‍ی‌ و ف‍ره‍ن‍گ‍ی‌.
32. - هیلن‌براند، رابورت، (1383). معماری اسلامی: فرم، عملکرد و معنی. ترجمۀ ایرج اعتصام، تهران: شرکت پردازش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری.
33. - هیلن‌براند، روبرت، (1374). معماری در هنرهای ایران. تألیف: دبلیو فریه، ترجمۀ پرویز مرزبان، تهران: نشر و پژوهش فرزان‌روز.
34. - هیلن‌براند، روبرت، (1379). معمــاری اســلامی. ترجمۀ ایــرج اعتصــام، تهــران: شــرکت پــردازش و برنامــه‌ریــزی شــهری.
35. - هیلن‌براند، روبرت، (1387الف). معماری اسلامی. ترجمۀ باقر شیرازی، چاپ دوم، تهران: انتشارات روزنه.
36. - هیلن‌براند، روبرت، (1387ب). «معماری صفوی». ترجمۀ محسن جاوری، در: تاریخ ایران کمبریج، تهران: انتشارات مهتاب.
37. - Behloolniri, B., (1390). “Study of tomb architectural methods from the patriarchal period to the Safavid era in Ardabil province”. Master Thesis in Archeology, Islamic Course, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch (Unpublished, In Persian).
38. - Bemanian M. & Nikoudel F., (2014). “Evaluation of Daylight-catching and Daylight Providing Methods in Mosques”. Researches in Islamic Architecture, No 2 (2), Pp: 60-74, (In Persian).
39. - Blair, Sh. & Bloom, J., (2010). The Art and Architecture of Islam (2). Translated by: Yaqub Azhand, third edition, Tehran: Scientific organization and compilation of books on humanities University (SAMT): The faculties of art of the Islamic Republic of Iran., (In Persian).
40. - Bozorgmehri, Z., (2011). Iranian Studies (Cognition, Pathology and Restoration). Tehran: Soroush Danesh Publications, (In Persian).
41. - Gharavi, M., (1997). Tomb in the context of Iranian culture. Tehran: Association of Cultural Works and Honor, (In Persian).
42. - Godard, A., (1998). Iranian Art. Translated by: Behrouz Habibi, third edition, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press, (In Persian).
43. - Golombek, L. & Wilber, D., (1995). The Timurid architecture of Iran and Turan‬.Translated by: Mohammad Yousef Kiani and Keramatullah Afsar, Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization, (In Persian).
44. - Graber, O.; Hatstein, M. & Delius, P., (2011). Islamic Architecture. Translated by: Akram Gheitasi, Tehran: Surah Mehr Publishing Company, (In Persian).
45. - Helen Brand, R., (2005). Islamic Architecture: Form, Function and Meaning.Translated by: Iraj Etesam, Tehran: Urban Processing and Planning Company, (In Persian).
46. - Helenbrand, R., (1996). Architecture in Iranian Arts. by: Ferrier, Ronald W, Translated by: Parviz Marzban, Tehran: Farzanourooz Publishing and Research, (In Persian).
47. - Helenbrand, R., (2001). Islamic Architecture. Translated by: Iraj Etesam, Tehran: Urban Processing and Planning Company, (In Persian).
48. - Helenbrand, R., (2009). Safavid Architecture. Translated by: Mohsen Javari in Cambridge History of Iran, Tehran: Mahtab Publication, (In Persian).
49. - Helenbrand, R., (2009a). Islamic Architecture. Translated by: Baqer Shirazi, second edition, Tehran: Rozaneh Publications, (In Persian).
50. - Hosseini, S. & Poor Karimi, P., (2015). “Tomb towers similar to the tomb tower of Sheikh Safi al-Din Ardabili in terms of architectural decorations”, Ardabil: Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Contemporary Iranian Islamic Architectural Traditions, (In Persian).
51. - Khajeh Nouri, E.; Flamaki, M. M. & Kaboudra Ahangi, M., (2018). “How brick formation and evolution in Iranian architecture”. Science and Engineering Elites, Vol. 2, N. 2, Pp: 235-202 (In Persian).
52. - Khakpour, M., (2013). “Typology of Lahijan holy shrines”. Studies of the Islamic Iranian city, No. 13, Pp: 92-81, (In Persian).
53. - Kiani, M. Y., (2000). History of Iranian Architectural Art in the Islamic Period.Third Edition, Tehran: Organization of Studies and Compilation of University Humanities Books (SAMT), (In Persian).
54. - Mahdavinejad, M. & Matoor, S., (2012). “ The Quality of Light-Openings in Iranian Domes (With the Structural Approach)”. Naqshejahan, No. 2 (2), Pp: 31-42, (In Persian).
55. - Masoudi asl, B.; Javadi, S.; Barati, N. & Farzin, A., (2018). “Architectural Basics of Imams Descendants’ Holy Shrines in Iran”. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, No. 15 (64), Pp: 5-14, (In Persian).
56. - May, T., (2011). Social Research, Issues, methods and process. United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Education.
57. - Meshbaki Esfahani, A., (2019). “Comparative comparison of the architecture of Seljuk and Ilkhanid tombs in Maragheh city with a physical attitude”. Research in Art and Humanities, Vol. 3, No, 2, Pp: 11-1, (In Persian).
58. - Mirmiran, S. H., (1995). “Principles of Iranian Architecture”. Abadi Magazine, Vol. 5, No. 19, Pp: 30-28, (In Persian).
59. - Mirmiran, S. H., (1998). “Saturation from matter to Spirit”. Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol. 6, No. 42 & 43. Pp: 100-94, (In Persian).
60. - Monshi, A., (1957). “History of the Abbasid world”. by: Iraj Afshar, Tehran: Mousavi Printing House, (In Persian).
61. - Nazari, S. & Bolkhar Ghehi, H., (2016). “Survey of Iranian Influences in Indian Funerary Architecture under the Sultanate of Delhi”. Iranian Architectural Studies, No. 8, Pp: 34-21, (In Persian).
62. - Nejad Ebrahimi, A. & Turanpour, M., (2019). “Sense of place in mosques based on a comparative study of the shape and place of construction of Fakhr-o-Madyn in historical mosques”. Iranian Archaeological Research, Vol. 9, No. 20, Pp: 182-165, (In Persian).
63. - Nemat Gorgani, U. A. B., (2002). “History of Light in Architecture and Lighting Fixtures in Islamic Art of Iran”. Asar, No. 35, Pp: 323-316, (In Persian).
64. - Oghazian, F., (2015). “Rereading the Geometric Patterns of the Shabak Element Based on Daylight Optimization (Case Study: Design of Qazvin Glass Office Building in Tehran)”. M. Sc. Thesis, Architectural Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University (Unpublished, In Persian).
65. - Parsa, M. A., (2011). “The Origin of Window Architecture An Inquiry in the Concept of Window in Persian Language and Culture”. Housing and rural environment, No. 30, (134), Pp: 75-94, (In Persian).
66. - Pirnia, M. K., (2009). Introduction to Iranian Islamic Architecture. Tehran: University of Science and Technology Publications, (In Persian).
67. - Pirnia, M. K., (2009). Iranian Architectural Stylistics. Tehran: Soroush Dana Publications, (In Persian).
68. - Pope, A., (2015). Persian architecture. Translated by: Gholam Hossein Sadri Afshar, 10th edition, Tehran: Dot Publications, (In Persian).
69. - Pugachenkova, A., (2009). Masterpieces of Central Asian Architecture. Translated by: Seyed Davood Tabaei, Tehran: Academy of Arts Publications, (In Persian).
70. - Rafaei, A., (2012). “The formation and role of tombs in Iranian architecture in the Islamic era (first to seventh century AH)”. Master's thesis, field of art, Isfahan University of Arts (Unpublished, In Persian).
71. - Ragin, Ch. C., (1987). The Comparative Method (Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies). California: University of California press.
72. - Sharahi, I. & Neyestani, J., (2015). “Archaeological study of the architecture of Tafresh Safavid tombs, Markazi province”. Specialized scientific quarterly, Archeology of Iran, Vol. 4, No. 1, Pp: 106-83, (In Persian).
73. - Wang, D. & Groat, L., (2002). Architectural research methods. Tehran: Printing and Publishing Institute, University of Tehran, (In Persian).
74. - Wilber, D. N., (1987). The Architecture of Islamic Iran: the Ilkhanid period‬. Translated by: Abdullah Farihar, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Higher Education, Company of scientific and cultural publications, (In Persian).
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Belali Oskoyi A, Sedaghati A, Hasan Khoshbakht P, Kafshdooz Salimi S. A Study of Physical-Semantic Evolution of “Fakhr and Madin” in Tomb Buildings Left Over from the Islamic Period (Comparative Study of Ilkhanid, Timurid and Safavid Periods). Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 2022; 5 (18) :179-201
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-588-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 5, Issue 18 (3-2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه مطالعات باستان شناسی پارسه Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.21 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4419