[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: year 4, Issue 12 (8-2020) ::
Parseh J Archaeol Stud 2020, 4(12): 61-73 Back to browse issues page
The Study of Petrography of the 4th Millennium B.C. Pottery of the Narjuiyeh in Jiroft
Yassin Sedghi 1, Iraj Beheshti2, Akbar Abedi3, Nasir Eskandari4, Farahangiz Sabuhi Sani5
1- M.A. in Archaeometry, Department Archaeometry of Faculty of Applied Arts, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran. , sedghi.yassin@yahoo.com
2- M.A. in Geology, Research Institute for the Preservation and Restoration of Historical Monuments, Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeometry and Archeology, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Iran.
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Archeology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
5- Master of Restoration of Historical and Cultural Objects, Department of Restoration, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Isfahan University of Arts, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract:   (3280 Views)
The site of Narjuiyeh III is located on the eastern natural mounds of the Narjuiyeh village, from the west overlooking Halil River. Scattering of the fourth millennium BC, especially typical Aliabad type are visible on these mounds. Traces of illegal excavation are also available as pits and holes all over the site. Aliabad ceramics are pottery dating back to the fourth millennium BC (Chalcolithic) in the southeast of the Iranian plateau, first excavated and reported by Caldwell from Aliabad in Bardsir of Kerman, and then have been found and reported from fourth millennium layers of Tell Iblis (Iblis IV) which eventually became known as Aliabad Culture (Caldwell, 1967).      Ali-Abad culture potteries (Chalcolithic age) dates back to the 4th millennium BC in southeast of Iran which the distribution of its potteries include the regions of Kerman, Balouchistan and Pakistan. Aliabad pottery in the south-east of the Iranian plateau is one of the most important and prominent pottery types in the Chalcolithic period (Eskandari and Mollasalehi, 2017), which for more detail understanding about this culture in addition to archaeological studies, requires scientific archaeometric analysis and methods; therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate, study and further understand the fourth millennium BC pottery of Aliabad culture from Jiroft’s Narjuiyeh III site and understanding the expansion of this culture by using structural and technical studies of pottery of this period. At the same time, it has been attempted to use the method of mineralogy (petrography) to get information about how to process the paste, clay type and used temper, conditions, heating and temperature of baking in the furnace, as well as the understanding of the origin of pottery of this area. Archaeological studies show that Aliabad culture in the southeast of the Iranian plateau was the dominant culture of the region in the fourth millennium BC. In this study, it has been attempted to obtain mineralogical information regarding pottery (Aliabad pottery) using library and thin section petrography studies. The polarized binocular microscope JamesSwift made in the United Kingdom at the Petrographic Laboratory of the Institute for Restoration and Conservation was used for microscopic study of the studied pottery.
Keywords: Archaeometry, Petrography, Aliabad Culture, Narjuiyeh in Jiroft, Southeast of Iran.

From the textural point of view, the pottery was divided into two main categories of fine-grained and coarse-grained specimens. In fine-grained specimens, the components are less than 0.5 mm in size, and the components are finely crystallized in the texture of pottery. A group of pottery has immature silty texture. In the texture of these potteries, there are fragments of different sizes next to each other, and there is some clutter and disarrangement to the size of the minerals in the pottery. In terms of composition, all available pottery has the same composition and their difference are in the percentage of pieces in the pottery texture and their size. In all available ceramics, there are several minerals, including quartz, in the form of monocrystalline (monocrystalline) and polycrystalline, which are more abundant in monocrystalline form. This mineral has angular to semicircular margins indicating that quartz fragments have been added as secondary to the primary source. In some samples, minor amounts of plagioclase, pyroxene and amphibole with mica are observed. Mica minerals are mostly muscovite grains that are orange-colored, but sometimes orange-yellow muscovite grains can also be seen in the samples. This reaction is due to the change in the optical properties of the grains at a temperature of approximately 1000 degrees Celsius, which can be partially detected the temperature the pottery tolerated on during the heating process. In some samples igneous rock, chert and quartz rock fragments were used as fillers. In some pottery, calcite minerals can also be observed and used to detect its temperature range. Therefore, it can be concluded that due to the geology of the region and the presence of calcium carbonate in the sedimentary deposits of the region, the absence of calcite mineralization in some samples indicates that the temperature of the ceramics is higher than 800 °C, and in calcite-clay ceramics, the baking temperature of the clay is less than 800 °C (Reedy 2008; Riederer 2004). The two N9 and N7 specimens differ in composition from the other specimens. In these two samples calcite minerals are associated with the clay texture, whereas in the other samples this is not the case.

Based on the petrographic study of the pottery, it can be deduced that the source of the pottery studied was identical and their source material was from the same region in Kerman. However, the origin of manufacture and extracting of soil mines cannot be determined definitely, because the geology of the Kerman region is very large and vast especially the studied areas are in volcanic formations, which, the mineralogical composition and sequence of some of them are granite, granodiorite to quartz. Metamorphic, plagioclases, clinopyroxenes, and mica minerals and igneous and metamorphic rocks are within the geological family of the area, which exactly similar compounds can be found with the minerals in the pottery. There are also three different groups for these pottery: 1) Pottery with homogeneous texture. In this type of pottery, fragments and minerals are seen floating and scattering in the texture. 2) Pottery in the texture in addition to clay and fine minerals, phyllosilicate minerals (mica) exist in combination with the texture. 3) In these ceramics the combination of the texture of mineral carbonate calcium (calcite) together with the clay texture is visible, a situation not seen in the other samples. This indicates that the pottery used has different manufacturing techniques, therefore, several pottery makers have been involved in preparation and procurement of early paste and clay of the pottery. Pottery samples N5, N6, N7, N8 and N9 contain calcite minerals. It can be suggesting that the baking temperature of these pottery was less than 800 degrees Celsius. In the samples containing muscovite minerals, some of the grains show changes from orange to yellow, indicating that these ceramics have been sustain a temperature of approximately 950-1000 °C. Based on the results and even the buff-orange color of the ceramics, it should be noted that the analyzed pottery were baked in an oxidation condition and in a closed furnace. The type of baking and precision used in baking the pottery in high quality, especially the 4th millennium BC pottery, is very high, indicating that the technique used in baking pottery was also very professional. Some ceramics, such as (N1, N8, N9) have porphyry texture and in their texture quartz mineral, chert stone and igneous rock have been used as filler and temper. In most cases, the edges of quartz minerals are edged and sharp, which, indicates the use of primary soil and its paste processing and resultant of grinding of core and ore extractive mining because all fragments and sherds have sharp and angular angles as well. It should also be noted that there is no evidence of the use of organic materials as temper in pottery making.

Keywords: Archaeometry, Petrography, Aliabad Culture, Narjuiyeh in Jiroft, Southeast of Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 1042 kb]   (539 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Interdisciplinary
Received: 2019/09/28 | Accepted: 2020/01/15 | Published: 2020/08/31
1. - اسکندری، نصیر، (1391). «ارزیابی گاهنگاری محوطۀ کنارصندل شمالی و سازۀ خشتی پله‌ای آن». مجلۀ پیام باستان‌شناس، سال 9، شمارۀ 18، صص: 76-69.
2. - اسکندری، نصیر، (1393). «گزارش نهایی کاوش لایه‌نگاری تپه دهنو بخش شهداد». کرمان: بایگانی اداره کل میراث‌فرهنگی، صنایع‌دستی و گردشگری استان کرمان (منتشرنشده).
3. - اسکندری، نصیر؛ ملاصالحی، حکمت‌الله؛ و فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن، (1395). «استقرارهای پیش‌از‌تاریخ دشت لوت، جنوب‌شرق ایران». مجلۀ مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، شمارۀ 8، صص: 15-1.
4. - رازانی، مهدی؛ گونیخرو، فلی مارتینز؛ منصوری‌اصفهانی، مهین؛ و افشاری‌نژاد، حکیمه، (1396). «آماده‌سازی مقاطع نازک از مواد متخلخل برای مطالعات با میکروسکوپ پلاریزان در باستان‌سنجی». نشریه پژوهه باستان‌سنجی، سال 3، شمارۀ 3، صص: 60-45.
5. - سلمانزاده، جواد؛ کاوش، حسینعلی؛ فاضلی‌نشلی، حسن؛ و بهشتی، سید‌ایرج، (1393). «نتایج آزمایشات پتروگرافی نمونه‌های سفالی تپه گراتزیانی». مجلۀ مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، دورۀ 6، شمارۀ 1، صص: 66-55.
6. - صدقی، یاسین؛ امین‎امامی، سیدمحمد؛ عابدی، اکبر؛ جهانگیری، احمد؛ و اسکندری، نصیر، (1395). «بررسی فنی سفال‌های فرهنگ علی‌آباد جنوب‌شرق (محوطۀ مختارآباد شهداد)». دوازدهمین همایش حفاظت و مرمت آثار تاریخی و فرهنگی، تهران: پژوهشکده حفاظت و مرمت.
7. - عباس‌نژاد، احمد، (1391). «زمین‌لغزه عظیم جیرفت: معرفی، نشانه‌ها و ویژگی‌ها». علوم زمین، سال 21، شمارۀ 83، صص: 48-41.
8. - مجیدزاده، یوسف، (1395). «گزارشی کوتاه از پنجمین فصل حفریات باستان‌شناختی در محوطه‌های کنارصندل و گورستان‌های محطوط‌آباد و قلعه‌کوچک: جیرفت». مجموعه مقالات نهمین گردهمایی سالانه باستان‌شناسی ایران (جلد اول)، تهران: پژوهشکدۀ باستان‌شناسی، صص: 472-463.
9. - ملاصالحی، حکمت‌الله؛ شفیعی، مژگان؛ فیروزمندی‌شیره‌چینی، بهمن؛ علیدادی سلیمانی، نادر؛ و اسکندری، نصیر، (1394). «خواجه‌عسکر: گورستانی از هزارۀ چهارم پیش‌ازمیلاد در جنوب‌شرق ایران از داده‌های مشهود تا بوده‌های مفقود». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی ایران، سال 4، شمارۀ 6، صص: 64-47.
10. - نبوی، محمدحسن، (1355). دیباچه‌ای بر زمین‌شناسی ایران. تهران: سازمان زمین‌شناسی کشور.
11. - نقشۀ 1:100000 زمین‌شناسی منطقۀ جیرفت (پایگاه ملی داده‌های علوم زمین کشور http://www.ngdir.ir/)، تاریخ دسترسی: 11/3/1395.
13. - Beale, T. W. & Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., (ed.), (1986). Excavations at Tepe Yahya, Iran 1967-1975. The Early Periods, American School of Prehistoric Research Bulletin. Vol. 38, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge.
14. - Boldea, D. A. & Praisler, M., (2013). “Petrographic characterization of painted eneolithic ceramics”. European Journal of Science and Theology, April 2013, Vol. 9, No. 2, Pp: 243-248.
15. - Caldwel, J. R., (1967). Investigations at Tal-I-Iblis. Springfield: Illinois State Museum Society, Preliminary Reports No 9.
16. - Dimitrijevic, M. D., (1973). “Geology of Kerman Region, Geological Survey of Iran”. Report No Yu/52.
17. - Hakemi. A., (1977). Shahdad: Archaeological Excavations of a Bronze Age Center in Iran. Instituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, Centro scavi e richerche archeologiche, Reports and Memoirs 27. Rome: Oxford & IBH.
18. - Madjidzade, Y., (2008). “Excavations at Konar Sandal in the region of the Jiroft in Halil Basin: First preliminary report (2002-2008)”. IRAN, Vol. 46, Pp: 69-103.
19. - Mutin. B., (2013). “Ceramic traditions and interactions on the south-eastern Iranian Plateau during the fourth millennium BC”. In: C. Petrie (ed) Ancient Iran and Its Neighbours: Local Developments and Long-range Interactions in the 4th Millennium BC. The British Institute of Persian Studies, Archaeological Monographs Series III, Pp: 253-276.
20. - Reedy, Ch. L., (2008). Thin-Section Petrography of Stone and Ceramic Cultural Materials. London: Archetype.
21. - Riederer, J., (2004). Thin Section Microscopy Applied to thr Study of Archaeological Ceramics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Printed in the Netherlands.
22. - Sajjadi, S. M. S., (1987). “Prehistoric Settlements in the Bardsir Plain, South-Eastern Iran”. East and West, No. 37, Pp: 11-129.
23. - Salvatori, S. & Vidale, M., (1982). “A Brief Surface Survey of the Protohistoric Site of Shahdad (Kerman, Iran): Preliminary Report”. Rivista di Archeologia, No. 6, Pp: 5-10.
24. - Stien, M. A., (1937). Archaeological Reconnaissances in North-Western India and South-Eastern Iran. London: Macmillan.
25. - Vidale, M. & Desset, F., (2013). “Mahtoutabad (KSS, Jiroft). Preliminary Evidence of Occupation of a Halil Rud Site in the early 4th Millennium BC”. In: C. Petrie (ed) Ancient Iran and Its Neighbours: Local Developments and Long-range Interactions in the 4th Millennium BC. The British Institute of Persian Studies, Archaeological Monographs Series, No. III, Pp: 233-252.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sedghi Y, Beheshti I, Abedi A, Eskandari N, Sabuhi Sani F. The Study of Petrography of the 4th Millennium B.C. Pottery of the Narjuiyeh in Jiroft. Parseh J Archaeol Stud. 2020; 4 (12) :61-73
URL: http://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-205-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 4, Issue 12 (8-2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه مطالعات باستان شناسی پارسه Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.18 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4419