logo
Volume 46, Issue 109 (8-2025)                   Athar 2025, 46(109): 135-158 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Younespour M, Azizifar G. (2025). An Analytical Study of Bow Motifs in Islamic Tombstones at the Archaeology Museum of Khalkhal County. Athar. 46(109), 135-158. doi:10.22034/Athar.1859
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-1859-en.html
1- M.A. student in ArchaeologyDepartment of Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil.Iran (Corresponding Author) , mahan.younespour@gmail.com
2- M.A. student in ArchaeologyDepartment of Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.
Abstract:   (2111 Views)
Abstract
Islamic art, characterized by its distinct cultural, religious, and social dimensions, has long served as a symbolic medium for conveying religious and societal concepts. Within this tradition, Islamic gravestones integrate artistic and spiritual elements, frequently featuring motifs such as the bow. As an emblem of weaponry and military prowess, the bow carries deep symbolic significance. Khalkhal County, known for its ancient history and rich cultural heritage, is an important area for the preservation of such gravestones. The Archaeology Museum of Khalkhal houses a diverse collection of gravestones that reflect the region’s artistic and cultural variety. This study adopts a descriptive–analytical approach, combining library research with field investigations to document and analyze bow motifs on five gravestones of box-shaped and cradle-shaped forms. Findings reveal that the bow motif, beyond its aesthetic qualities, symbolizes the link between the earthly and spiritual realms and represents resilience against the passage of time. These motifs are frequently accompanied by decorative elements such as floral designs, vegetal forms, and geometric patterns, creating a complex visual language for expressing religious and cultural ideals. Comparative analysis with examples from other regions indicates that gravestones featuring bow motifs are predominantly box-shaped and often paired with depictions of swords. The study emphasizes the necessity of preserving and documenting such artifacts, which act as vital symbols of the cultural and historical identity of Islamic society and play a central role in transmitting religious and social values.
Keywords: Islamic Era, Khalkhal, Bow Motif, Iconography, Tombstone.

Introduction
Islamic funerary art, as a profound and symbolic facet of Islamic culture, reflects societal values, religious beliefs, and aesthetic principles through its visual elements (Grabar, 1992; Ruggles, 2011). Among these elements, the bow motif occupies a prominent position, symbolizing strength, bravery, and the link between the material and spiritual realms (Kazempour & Shokrpour, 2021). Islamic tombstones adorned with bow motifs serve as more than mere grave markers; they embody the cultural and historical narratives of the communities that produced them (Charaee, 2008). This research focuses on Islamic tombstones preserved in the Archaeology Museum of Khalkhal County, a region notable for its rich material culture and historical artifacts. It examines the artistic, cultural, and symbolic dimensions of the bow motifs found on these tombstones. Specifically, the study seeks to analyze the design and symbolism of bow motifs, explore their broader associations within Islamic cultural and spiritual contexts, and compare them with similar motifs from other Islamic regions (Mohammadian et al., 2020). Through this comparative lens, the research aims to deepen the understanding of Islamic funerary art and highlight its role in safeguarding intangible cultural heritage (Setarnezhad & Afkhami, 2021).

Methods
This descriptive–analytical study investigates weapon motifs, particularly bows, depicted on Islamic gravestones in the Archaeology Museum of Khalkhal County. Data collection involved both library research and fieldwork, including photographic documentation and motif analysis using CorelDRAW software. Five gravestones featuring weapon motifs were selected for detailed examination. To interpret and compare the motifs with those found in other Islamic regions, the study applied content analysis and comparative analysis. The research tools included photography, digital illustration software (CorelDRAW), and bibliographic resources. Fieldwork was constrained by several limitations: the physical degradation of motifs, restricted access to certain gravestones, and the paucity of specialized scholarly resources. All procedures adhered to ethical research standards, including obtaining official authorization from the museum for photography and documentation.

Findings
The bow motifs on the tombstones of Khalkhal serve as profound visual representations of the deeply embedded cultural, religious, and spiritual values of Islamic societies. These motifs are intricately carved with remarkable detail and are frequently accompanied by decorative elements such as floral designs and geometric patterns, forming a rich, multi-layered symbolism. In certain cases, the bow is paired with additional martial symbols, such as swords or prayer niches (mihrabs) which both enhance visual appeal and reinforce symbolic meanings of strength, protection, and divine guardianship (Setarnezhad & Afkhami, 2021). The symbolism of the bow extends far beyond its aesthetic function. It identifies the deceased as both a defender of the faith and a protector of societal values, signifying their contributions to the defense of their community (Charaee, 2008). Within the broader framework of Islamic cosmology, the bow also resonates with concepts of cosmic balance and resilience, suggesting a spiritual dimension that emphasizes endurance in the face of hardship (Kazempour & Shokrpour, 2021). In this regard, the motif reflects not only martial prowess but also the enduring strength of the soul, transcending physical death. Consequently, the tombstones of Khalkhal function as more than markers of death; they are integral components of the region’s cultural landscape, underscoring the community’s unique identity while simultaneously echoing broader Islamic funerary traditions observed elsewhere. The careful use of durable materials and sophisticated carving techniques demonstrates the community’s respect for its heritage and its commitment to preserving cultural continuity (Grabar, 1992). Comparative analysis with similar motifs from regions such as Azerbaijan and Central Asia reveals shared cultural themes martial strength and spiritual resilience alongside distinctive local stylistic expressions. Such regional variations in artistic practice contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of shared cultural values (Kleiss, 1969). The bow motif reached its height during the Ilkhanid and Safavid periods, reflecting its central role in the socio-cultural structures of these eras. Its continued usage in these periods underscores the enduring significance of the motif within Islamic art and society (Nicolle, 1996). Ultimately, the bow motifs on the tombstones of Khalkhal are not merely ornamental. They stand as powerful symbols reflecting the intersection of martial, spiritual, and cultural values that have shaped the region’s identity and affirmed its place within the broader Islamic world.

Conclusion
The bow motifs on Islamic tombstones in Khalkhal embody a synthesis of art and spirituality, symbolizing the connection between the material and spiritual realms of life and death. These tombstones, adorned with intricate designs and decorative elements such as floral, vegetal, and geometric patterns, convey messages of strength, stability, and the bond between heaven and earth. In all examined cases, the bas-relief designs are accompanied by mihrab motifs, underscoring the spiritual and religious significance of these works. Across different historical periods, these motifs served as markers of the social, cultural, and religious status of the deceased, reflecting the prevailing beliefs of the Islamic community of the time. Comparative analyses reveal that such designs were shaped by cultural, social, and religious transformations over the centuries, offering valuable insights into the historical and artistic evolution of the region. The preservation and documentation of these tombstones not only safeguard cultural heritage but also advance our understanding of the cultural and spiritual connections that define Islamic history.
Full-Text [PDF 1490 kb]   (768 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Archeology and History of Art
Received: 2024/12/24 | Accepted: 2025/04/21 | Published: 2025/08/23

References
1. - احسن، محمدمناظر، (1369). «زندگی اجتماعی در حکومت عباسیان». ترجمۀ مسعود رجب‌نیا: تهران.
2. - افخمی، بهروز؛ و ستارنژاد، سعید، (1400). «پژوهشی بر شناخت سنگ‌مزارهای دوران اسلامی شهرستان ورزقان در استان آذربایجان شرق». اثر، 42(4): 552-567. URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-942-fa.html
3. - پاینده، ابوالقاسم، (۱۳۵۶). نهج الفصاحه (سخنان پیامبر اکرم (ص). تهران: جاویدان.
4. - پروین، صمد، (1395)، «بررسی باستان‌شناختی سنگ‌قبرهای اسلامی شهرستان مشگین‌شهر؛ مطالعۀ موردی قبرستان اونار». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، گروه باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
5. - پورکریم، هوشنگ، (۱۳42). سنگ‌مزارهای ایران. تهران: سازمان میراث‌فرهنگی ایران.
6. - ثمری، مریم، (1395). «مطالعه و بررسی سنگ‌قبرهای دورۀ اسلامی شهرستان اردبیل». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، گروه باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
7. - جعفرپورگله‌پردسری، سمیرا، (1398). «‫مطالعه و بررسی جنگ افزارهای دورۀ اشکانی در گیلان (مطالعات موردی محوطه‌های باستانی لیارسنگ بن املش،وسکه، میان‌رود و گوریه سر رضوانشهر)». پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، گروه باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬
8. - چارئی، ‌عبد‌الرضا، (1387). «هنرهای سنتی: نقش های سنگ‌مزارهای گورستان دارالسلام شیراز». آینه خیال، 6(1): 132-139. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/download/4110
9. - حرّعاملی، محمدبن حسن، (۱۳۸۵). وسائل الشیعه. چاپ هشتم، تهران: اسلامیه.
10. - خوش‌پسند، دنیا، (1389). فرهنگ جنگ‌افزار در شاهنامۀ فردوسی. به‌کوشش: عطاءالله کوپال، تهران، چاپ دوم.
11. - رازانی، زاهدی؛ و امیدیان، امید، (1400). «در آمدی بر مبانی اسلامی حفظ و مرمت سنگ قبور تاریخی بر اساس به احکام و مقتضیات شرعی». دانش حفاظت و مرمت، 5(14): 1-11. URL: http://kcr.richt.ir/article-6-1790-fa.html
12. - ستارنژاد، سعید؛ و پوردرخشش، حسین، (1400). «تحلیلی بر سنگ‌افراشته‌های دوران اسلامی گورستان اونار مشگین‌شهر (شمال‌غرب ایران)». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی دوران اسلامی، 2(3): 27-43. https://doi.org/10.22080/jiar.2021.21360.1003
13. - ستارنژاد، سعید؛ نریمانی، مصیب؛ و عزیزی، شیما، (1399). «گونه‌شناسی، طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل سنگ‌مزارهای اسلامی شمال‌غرب ایران (مطالعۀ موردی دورۀ ایلخانی تا پایان دورۀ صفویه)». نگره، 16(59): 163-177. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2020.4881.2338
14. - سرفراز، علی‌اکبر؛ و آورزمانی، فریدون، (1398). سکه‌های ایران از آغار تا دوران زندیه. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
15. - شاکر، محمود، (1379). التاریخ الاسلامی. دارالمعرفه.
16. - شعبانی، رضا، (۱۳۸۹). «مطالعات میدانی بر روی سنگ‌قبرهای اسلامی ایران». مطالعات باستان‌شناسی ایران، ۸(۱): ۴۵-۶۰.
17. - صحیح بخاری، حدیث شمارۀ ۲۹۲۱؛ صحیح مسلم، حدیث شمارۀ ۱۹۱۷.
18. - صدرایی، علی؛ و معروفی‌اقدم، اسماعیل، (1400). «پژوهشی بر بازتاب ادوات جنگی در نقوش سنگ قبور دوران اسلامی ایران». اثر، ۴۲ (۳) :۴۴۶-۴۲۴. URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-901-fa.html
19. - غفاری‌فرد، عباسقلی، (1388). زن در تاریخ‌نگاری صفویه. تهران: امیرکبیر.
20. - فرخ، کاوه، (1395). سواره‌نظام زبده ساسانیان 642_224 ب.م. مترجم: فخرالسادات بصام، تهران: نشر شاپیکان.
21. - کاظم‌پور، مهدی؛ محمدزاده، مهدی؛ و شکرپور، شهریار، (1399). «تحلیل نمادشناسی نقوش سنگ‌مزارات اسلامی موزۀ شهر اهر». نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی، 25(1): 71-86. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2018.266150.666028
22. - کخ، هاید ماری، (1386). از زبان داریوش. مترجم: دکتر پرویز رجبی، تهران: نشر کارنگ.
23. - کمپفر، انگلبرت، (1363). سفرنامۀ کمپفر. ترجمۀ کیکاووس جهانداری، تهران: نشر: خوارزمی، چاپ سوم.
24. - محمدیان، ‌فخرالدین؛ و شریف‌کاظمی، مهرآفرین، (1398). «بازتاب جایگاه نقش تیر و کمان در تاریخ و فرهنگ ایران». پژوهش هنر دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، 17(9): 33-46. https://ph.aui.ac.ir/article-1-714-fa.pdf
25. - ملک‌شهمیرزادی، صادق، (1391). ایران در پیش از تاریخ: باستان‌شناسی ایران از آغاز تا سپیده‌دم شهرنشینی. تهران: انتشارات سبحان نور.
26. - نورمحمدی، محمد؛ و بیاتلو، حسین، (1391). «تنوع و تکامل پرتابه‌های جنگی در دوره اسلامی». تاریخ و تمدن اسلامی، 8(16): 87-116. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157149/fa
27. - ورجاوند، پرویز، (۱۳۶۶). هنرهای سنتی ایران. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
28. - وندائی، میلاد، (1392). نقوش‌برجستۀ ساسانی. تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سازمان چاپ و انتشارات.
29. - هوشنگ‌پور، کریم، (1342). «سنگ‌مزارهای ایران». هنر و مردم، 12: 29-29.
31. - Afkhami, B. & Saternjad, S., (2021). “A Study on the Identification of Islamic Tombstones in Varzaqan County, East Azerbaijan Province”. Athar, 42(4): 552-567. http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-942-fa.html (In Persian).
32. - Ahsan, M. M., (1990). Social Life under the Abbasid Rule. Translated by M. Rajabnia. Tehran. (In Persian).
33. - Amin, O., (1981). Islamic Art and Architecture. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.
34. - Atlas Mythica. (n.d.). Bow and arrow symbolism & meaning (leadership, fate & more). Retrieved from: https://atlasmythica.com/bow-and-arrow-symbolism-meaning/
35. - Bivar, A. D. H., (1972). “Cavalry equipment and tactics on the Euphrates frontier”. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 26: 271-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1291323
36. - Blair, S. & Bloom, J., (2006). The art and architecture of Islam: 1250–1800. Yale University Press.
37. - Canby, S. R., (2009). Islamic art in detail. British Museum Press.
38. - Chareei, A., (2008). “Traditional Arts: Tombstone Motifs in Dar al-Salam Cemetery, Shiraz”. Ayeneh-Khayal, 6(1): 132-139. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/download/4110 (In Persian).
39. - Department of Arms and Armor. (2004). “Islamic arms and armor”. In: Heilbrunn timeline of art history. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved from [http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/isaa/hd_isaa.htm](http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/isaa/hd_isaa.htm)
40. - Elgood, R., (1994). The Arms and Armour of Arabia in the 18–19th and 20th Centuries. London: Scolar Press.
41. - Ettinghausen, R., Grabar, O. & Jenkins-Madina, M. (2001). Islamic art and architecture: 650–1800. Yale University Press.
42. - Farrokh, K., (2016). The Elite Cavalry of the Sassanids 224–642 CE. Translated by F. Basam. Tehran: Shapikan Publishing. (In Persian).
43. - Felix, J., (2015). Early Tools and Weapons: A Glimpse into Prehistoric Innovation. Chicago: Pretech Publications.
44. - Ghaffari-Fard, A., (2009). Women in Safavid Historiography. Tehran: Amir Kabir. (In Persian).
45. - Golombek, L., (1988). “The stylistic evolution of Islamic tombstones in Iran”. Iranian Studies, 21(1-2): 47-72.
46. - Grabar, O., (1992). The mediation of ornament. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.114743
47. - Harami, M. b. H., (2006). Wasael al-Shi'a. 8th Edition, Tehran: Islamiya. (In Persian).
48. - Houshangpour, K., (1963). “Tombstones of Iran”. Honar va Mardom, 12: 29-29. (In Persian).
49. - Ibrahim, T., (2016). “Notes on the bow in al-Andalus and its ideological historical context”.MANQUSO, 5: 91–95.
50. - Insoll, T., Almaharai, S. & MacLean, R., (2019). The Islamic funeral inscriptions of Bahrain, pre–1317 AH/1900 AD. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004383661
51. - Jafarpoor Goleh Pardasri, S., (2019). “Study and Analysis of Parthian Era Weapons in Gilan (Case Studies of Ancient Sites Liar Sang, Bon Amlesh, Vaske, Mian Rud, and Guriyeh Sar of Rezvanshahr)”. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of Archaeology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.(In Persian).
52. - Kaempfer, E., (1984). Kaempfer’s Travelogue. Translated by K. Jahandari. Tehran: Khwarazmi, 3rd Edition. (In Persian).
53. - Kazempour, M. & Shokrpour, S. (2021). “A symbolic analysis of Islamic period gravestones in the Ahar Museum”. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 25(4): 1065-1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-021-00588-6
54. - Kazempour, M., Mohammadzadeh, M. & Shakerpour, S., (2020). “Symbolic Analysis of Islamic Tombstone Motifs at Ahar Museum”. Fine Arts Journal: Visual Arts, 25(1): 71-86. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2018.266150.666028 (In Persian).
55. - Khosh-Pasand, D., (2010). The Culture of Weapons in Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh. edited by A. Koopal, Tehran, 2nd Edition. (In Persian).
56. - Kleiss, W., (1969). “Islamic steles in North-Western Iran”. Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, 1: 84-96.
57. - Koch, H.-M., (2007). From the Words of Darius. Translated by P. Rajabi. Tehran: Karang Publishing. (In Persian).
58. - Latham, J. D. & Paterson, J. M. (1970). Saracens and Crusaders. London: Routledge.
59. - Malek-Shahmirzadi, S., (2012). Prehistoric Iran: Archaeology from the Beginning to the Dawn of Urbanism. Tehran: Sobhan Noor Publications. (In Persian).
60. - Maler, W., Shyeh, S. K. M., Oetomo, R. W. & Suprayitno, M. S., (2020). Comparison between Barus and Plak-Pling tombstones based on analysis of motif design.‌
61. - Mohammadian, F. & Sharif-Kazemi, M., (2019). “The Role of Bow Motifs in Iranian History and Culture”. Honar-e Pazhouhesh, 17(9): 33-46. https://ph.aui.ac.ir/article-1-714-fa.pdf (In Persian).
62. - Mohammadian, M. et al., (2020). “Bow motifs in the Islamic art of Northwest Iran”. Nagreh Quarterly, 16(59): 163-177. https://ph.aui.ac.ir/article-1-714-fa.pdf
63. - Nazari, A., Ahmadi, M. & Mohammadi, R., (2020). “Study of Islamic tombstones in Northwestern Iran”. Iranian Journal of Archaeology, 12(3): 45-60.
64. - Nicolle, D., (1996). Arms and Armour of the Crusading Era, 1050-1350. London: Greenhill Books
65. - Nourmohammadi, M. & Bayatloo, H., (2012). “Diversity and Evolution of Projectile Weapons in the Islamic Period”. Islamic History and Civilization, 8(16): 87-116. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/157149/fa (In Persian).
66. - Paayandeh, A., (1977). Nahj al-Fasahah (Sayings of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)). Tehran: Javidan. (In Persian).
67. - Parvin, S., (2016). “Archaeological Study of Islamic Tombstones in Meshginshahr County: Case Study of Onar Cemetery”. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of Archaeology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran. (In Persian).
68. - Pourkarim, H., (1963). Tombstones of Iran. Tehran: Iran Cultural Heritage Organization. (In Persian).
69. - Razani, Z. & Omidian, O., (2021). “An Introduction to Islamic Principles of Preservation and Restoration of Historical Tombstones Based on Sharia Rules”. Journal of Conservation and Restoration, 5(14): 1-11. http://kcr.richt.ir/article-6-1790-fa.html (In Persian).
70. - Ruggles, D. F. (2011). Islamic art and visual culture: An anthology of sources. Wiley-Blackwell.
71. - Sadraei, A. & Maroufi-Aghdam, E., (2021). “A Study on the Reflection of Weapons in the Motifs of Islamic Tombstones in Iran”. Athar, 42(3): 424-446. http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-901-fa.html (In Persian).
72. - Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith No. (2921). Sahih Muslim, Hadith No. 1917. (In Persian).
73. - Samari, M., (2016). “Study and Analysis of Islamic Tombstones in Ardabil County”. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of Archaeology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran. (In Persian).
74. - Sarfaraz, A. A. & Avrzamani, F., (2019). Coins of Iran from the Beginning to the Zand Era. Tehran: SAMT Publications. (In Persian).
75. - Saternjad, S. & puor derakhshesh, H., (2021). “An Analysis of Islamic Stelae in Onar Cemetery, Meshginshahr (Northwest Iran)”. Journal of Islamic Archaeology Studies, 2(3): 27-43. https://doi.org/10.22080/jiar.2021.21360.1003 (In Persian).
76. - Saternjad, S., Narimani, M. & Azizi, (2020). “Typology, Classification, and Analysis of Islamic Tombstones in Northwest Iran: Case Study from the Ilkhanid to the End of the Safavid Period”. Negareh Quarterly, 16(59): 163-177. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2020.4881.2338 (In Persian).
77. - Setarnezhad, B. & Afkhami, S. (2021). “Research on Islamic period tombstones in Varzeqan, East Azerbaijan Province”. Scientific Quarterly, 42(4): 552-567.
78. - Shabani, R., (2010). “Field Studies on Islamic Tombstones of Iran”. Iranian Archaeological Studies, 8(1): 45-60. (In Persian).
79. - Shaker, M., (2000). Al-Tarikh al-Islami. Dar al-Ma’rifah. (In Persian).
80. - Thompson, J., (2003). Islamic inscriptions: Analysis and interpretation. Edinburgh University Press.
81. - Vandayi, M., (2013). Sassanian Reliefs. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Printing and Publications Organization. (In Persian).
82. - Varjavand, P., (1987). Traditional Arts of Iran. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (In Persian).
83. - Welch, A., (1979). Calligraphy in the arts of the Muslim world. The Asia Society.
84. - Welch, A. (2006). Art and Architecture of the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. - Wilcox, P., (2001). Rome's Enemies 3: Parthinas and Sassanid Persians. Oxford, United Kingdom: Osprey Publishing.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.