logo
Volume 46, Issue 109 (8-2025)                   Athar 2025, 46(109): 159-181 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadi Khoshbin H, Moradi A. (2025). Transparency and its Characteristics in Talesh Vernacular Housing. Athar. 46(109), 159-181. doi:10.22034/Athar.1857
URL: http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-1857-en.html
1- , hm.khoshbin@guilan.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2237 Views)
Abstract
Transparency has become an increasingly prominent principle in contemporary architecture, recognized as a key strategy for enhancing spatial quality. In the design and construction of modern buildings particularly within the housing sector overemphasis on quantitative metrics and physical requirements has often diminished the richness of spatial experiences. When thoughtfully incorporated into architectural design, transparency can serve as a powerful means of enriching residential environments. This concept encompasses multiple dimensions and components and has been creatively manifested in the vernacular architecture of Gilan. Understanding and applying these traditional interpretations of transparency can offer valuable insights for improving the spatial quality of contemporary residential architecture. The present study aims to identify indicators of transparency in architecture and to examine their application in the traditional houses of Talesh as a case study. Employing a qualitative approach, the first stage provides a descriptive and analytical formulation of the concept, characteristics, and indicators of transparency, supported by library-based research. In the second stage, the components and indicators identified earlier are examined in ten vernacular houses in Talesh, highlighting the physical and spatial manifestations of transparency in these buildings. Results indicate that transparency operates at various levels within the vernacular architecture of Talesh. Physical–structural transparency is expressed through façade elements such as openings, iwan (porches), gholamgardesh (semi-open corridors), telar (terraces), and niches. Visual–perceptual transparency emerges through windows, sightlines, and spatial continuity. Behavioral–functional transparency is shaped by connected spaces, staircases, and semi-open elements like porches and terraces. Finally, semantic–conceptual transparency, though less prevalent, appears in features such as lattice surfaces and the application of color.
Keywords: Transparency, Levels of Manifestation of Transparency, Characteristics and Indicators of Transparency, Vernacular Architecture, Vernacular Housing of Talesh.

Introduction
Transparency is a multifaceted concept that has been studied across diverse scientific disciplines, with its significance steadily increasing over time. In architecture, transparency is understood as both a spatial and visual quality, extending beyond the physical or tangible aspects of a structure to encompass a rich array of dimensions and meanings. Linguistically, the term denotes clarity, purity, brightness, and visibility. In architectural contexts, it refers to characteristics such as translucency, see-through quality, glassiness, and the capacity to transmit light, permitting visual access beyond a surface. Literally, transparency conveys the physical properties of a material, while in practice it relates to the spatial organization and articulation of architectural form. Throughout different historical periods, transparency in architecture has manifested in varying elements and levels, shaped by the prevailing cultural, environmental, and technological conditions of each era. As transparency has emerged as an important design consideration, it is evident that diverse interpretations and applications of this concept are present in the vernacular architecture of different regions.
Gilan Province, located in northern Iran, is geographically divided into two principal zones: mountainous (elevated) regions and lowland plains. Each zone has developed its own distinctive vernacular architectural style. Talesh County, situated within Gilan Province, encompasses the Talesh Mountains, foothills, and plains. This research aims to investigate how various levels and indicators of transparency are expressed in the traditional housing of this region, focusing specifically on vernacular buildings in the plains area of Talesh County. Ten traditional houses were selected as case studies. The study addresses the following key research questions:
• What is transparency?
• What are the different levels of transparency?
• What are the characteristics of Talesh’s vernacular architecture?
• How are the various levels of transparency manifested in the traditional housing of Talesh?
Understanding transparency in architecture can deepen conceptual comprehension and reveal its functional potential. Examining the indicators and expressions of transparency in vernacular buildings not only identifies fundamental architectural principles but also provides guidance for integrating these principles into contemporary architectural design strategies.

Discussion
In architectural discourse, transparency refers to a spatial quality arising from the relationship between a space’s interior and exterior surfaces. It mitigates the solidity of these boundaries, fostering a sense of openness. Transparency may be classified into three principal dimensions—visual clarity, perceptual transparency, and conceptual or semantic transparency—each manifesting at different levels. For analytical purposes, these levels can be grouped into four main categories:
1. Physical–Structural Transparency — Evident in spatial geometry, material reduction, the use of transparent surfaces, and the visibility of structural elements and form.
2. Visual–Perceptual Transparency — Designed to establish a clear visual connection between interior and exterior. In Iranian architecture, this is exemplified through elements such as Fakhr-o-Madayyen, orsi windows, shabak (lattices), and rozan (small openings).
3. Behavioral–Functional Transparency — One of the most significant levels, perceived through users’ movement and interaction within the space, and strongly associated with spatial continuity.
4. Semantic–Conceptual Transparency — Derives from cultural and spiritual values, manifested in Iranian architecture through symbolic light, mystical concepts, and Islamic motifs such as eslimi patterns.
Vernacular architecture is a direct reflection of the cultural identity, customs, and lifestyle of its region. The traditional houses of Talesh—located in the western part of Gilan Province exemplify this approach. Characteristic features include elongated rectangular plans, sloped roofs, minimal ornamentation, functional layouts, the absence of basements, high porosity in main façades, integration with natural surroundings, aligned dual-sided openings, and the use of locally sourced materials. In this study, transparency levels in ten vernacular houses of Talesh were analyzed according to four criteria: physical–structural (structural perception), visual–perceptual (visual understanding), behavioral–functional (spatial experience), and semantic–conceptual (mental interpretations). Each criterion was subdivided into three indicators, and the presence of these elements was systematically evaluated. Findings highlight the pivotal role of gholamgardesh, iwan (porches), and telar (terraces) in enhancing transparency within Talesh architecture. These elements not only permit greater daylight penetration into interior spaces but also contribute to physical, visual, and spatial perceptions of transparency. Openings, including doors, windows, and niches further increase transparency by revealing additional spatial layers and reducing material mass. Staircases add spatial fluidity and strengthen perceptual continuity. The incorporation of railings and lattice surfaces supports both physical and symbolic transparency, resonating with Islamic artistic traditions. Moreover, the use of color in architectural components enriches symbolic and mystical interpretations, deepening the conceptual understanding of transparency.

Conclusion
An in-depth understanding of transparency and its associated indicators can serve as an effective strategy for enhancing spatial quality in contemporary building design. These principles and their distinctive features have long been embedded in vernacular architecture. By examining how transparency manifests in traditional residential buildings, architects can derive strategies applicable to modern design practices. In the vernacular housing of Talesh, transparency occupies a central position. The architectural tradition of this region employs various elements to achieve spatial transparency, with telar (terrace), iwan (porch), gholamgardesh (semi-open corridor), and aligned openings playing the most prominent roles. Beyond their practical and functional applications, these components exert the greatest influence at the behavioral–functional level of transparency. Furthermore, open and semi-open spaces at the physical–structural level, coupled with reduced spatial boundaries at the visual–perceptual level, strengthen the experience of openness. Flat openings contribute to both structural and perceptual transparency. Additional features in Talesh vernacular housing, such as niches, rozan (small windows), staircases, color schemes, and perforated surfaces, also enhance transparency in meaningful ways. By suitably adapting and modernizing these principles whether through the integration of contemporary materials and construction techniques or through alterations in form and spatial organization it becomes possible to more effectively meet human needs and substantially improve the quality of modern housing.
Full-Text [PDF 1494 kb]   (756 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Architecture
Received: 2025/02/17 | Accepted: 2025/05/26 | Published: 2025/08/23

References
1. - امیراحمدیان، بهرام، (1380). «تالش، ولایتی در در جنوب قفقاز». تحقیقات تالش، 1(1): 25.
2. - بابایی، محمدرضا؛ سلطان‌زاده، حسین، و شریک‌زاده، مسعود. (1390). «مقدمه ای بر مفهوم و انواع شفافیت در هنر و معماری معاصر غرب.». نشریۀ انجمن علمی معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 3(3): 5-16. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2011.61942
3. - پاکباز، رویین، (1400). دایره المعارف هنر. چاپ شانزدهم. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
4. - جعفری، عباس، (1379). دایره المعارف جغرافیایی ایران. جلد1.
5. - حسن‌پور لمر، سعید، (1393). «گونه شناسی خانه‌های سنتی شهرستان تالش نمونه موردی: روستای خاله سرا 57». مسکن و محیط روستا، 33(147): 117-131. http://jhre.ir/article-1-594-fa.html
6. - دامیار، سجاد؛ و ناری قمی، مسعود، (1391). «مطالعه تطبیقی مفهوم فضا در معماری بومی و معماری مدرن». هنرهای زیبا، 17(1): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2012.29698
7. - دربندی، مریم؛ احمدی، محمد؛ علی‌دوست، ساناز، و رحیمی، سمیرا، (1394). «بهبود عملکرد عناصر معماری زمینه‌گرا در معماری گیلان و بازآفرینی آن در ساختارهای امروزی با استفاده از تکنولوژی نانو». نشریه انجمن علمی معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 6(2): 5-18. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2016.62004
8. - دری، علی؛ و طلیسچی، غلامرضا، (1396). «تبیین شفافیت ساختار فضایی معماری ایران در دورۀ صفو یه مطالعۀ موردی : کوشک هشت بهشت و مسجد امام اصفهان». مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، 7(27): 41-50 https://sid.ir/paper/177421/fa
9. - دهخدا، علی‌اکبر، (1393). لغت‌نامۀ دهخدا. تهران: روزنه.
10. - رهنمایی، محمدتقی، (1380). «کجایی تالش و کیستی تالشان». تحقیقات تالش، 1(1): 9-14.
11. - سالاری، سوگل؛ محمدی، بهزاد؛ و پیری، سعید، (1392). «بررسی تحلیلی نمود شفافیت و تأکید بر کاستن از ماده و افزایش فضا دربرخی نمونه‌های ارزشمند معماری ایرانی». مطالعات محیطی هفت حصار، 1(4): 71-81. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23225602.1392.1.4.7.9
12. - سعادت، داوود؛ اعتصام، ایرج؛ مختاباد امرئی، سید مصطفی؛ و مهدوی‌نژاد، محمدجواد، (1396). «تبیین مفهوم شفافیت در دوره‌های مدرن، پست‌مدرن و ارزیابی آن در معماری اسلامی ایرانی». پژوهش های معماری اسلامی، 5(15): 75-90. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-766-en.html
13. - شادقزوینی، پریسا؛ پاک‌سرشت، سیما؛ و فاطمی، فریماه، (1395). «تنوع نقوش اسلیمی روکوکویی در مبلمان دوره ناصری (مطالعه موردی: تزئینات مبلمانِ باغ عفیف آباد و نارنجستان شیراز)». پیکره، 5(9): 19-33. https://doi.org/10.22055/pyk.2016.14547
14. - صارمی، علی‌اکبر؛ و گل‌امینی، شهرام، (1380). «معماری گیلان». کتاب گیلان (جلد دوم)، ابراهیم اصلاح عربانی، چاپ دوم. تهران: گروه پژوهشگران ایران.
15. - علی‌پور، نیلوفر، (1390). «مطالعه طرح ارسی‌های کاخ‌های قاجاری تهران». نگره، 9 (18): 0-3 https://sid.ir/paper/143047/fa
16. - علی‌محمدی، غلامرضا؛ و عبدالهی، رکسانا، (1397). «تبیین مبانی نمود فرهنگ در معماری بومی ایران و ارتباط آن با ایجاد حس تعلق به مکان». مدیریت شهری، 17 (50): 33-46. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-2163-fa.html
17. - عمید، حسن، (1393). فرهنگ عمید. تهران: امیر کبیر.
18. - فقیرنواز، جواد؛ ابی‌زاده، سامان؛ پرویزی، رضا؛ و دانش شکیب، مریم، (1399). «طراحی فضای شهری سرزنده با رویکرد ارتقای قرارگاه رفتاری (مطالعه موردی: خیابان میرابوالقاسمی رشت)». دانش شهرسازی، 5(1): 47-65. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.13801.1243
19. - گرجی‌مهلبانی، یوسف؛ و دانشور، کیمیا، (1389). «تأثیر اقلیم بر شکل گیری عناصر معماری سنتی گیلان». آرمانشهر، 3 (4): 135-146. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_32649.html
20. - گلستانی، سعید؛ حجت، عیسی؛ و سعدوندی، مهدی، (1396). «جستاری در مفهوم پیوستگی فضا و روند تحولات آن در مساجد ایران». هنرهای زیبا معماری و شهرسازی، 22(4): 29-44. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.65695
21. - لنگ، جان، (1395). آفرینش نظریه معماری. ترجمۀ علیرضا عینی‌فر، چاپ هشتم، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
22. - مرزبان، پرویز؛ و معروف، حسن، (1392). فرهنگ مصور هنرهای تجسمی. چاپ ششم، تهران: سروش.
23. - مومنی، کورش، (1397). «مقایسه و تطبیق اصل شفافیت در کالبد و طرح خانه های دورۀ صفوی و قاجار اصفهان». پژوهش‌های معماری اسلامی، 6 (18): 23-42. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-921-en.html
24. - مهدوی‌نژاد، محمدجواد؛ و کیا، آنوشا، (1398). «معاصرسازی پوسته‌های سنتی (شباک) معماری ایرانی، جهتِ بهینه‌سازی دریافت نور و انرژی؛ نمونه مطالعاتی: بناهای اداری تهران». معماری اقلیم گرم و خشک، 7(9): 69-82. https://smb.yazd.ac.ir/article_1655.html?lang=fa
25. - نژادابراهیمی، احد؛ و توران‌پور، محیا، (1398). «حس مکان در مساجد براساس مطالعۀ تطبیقی شکل و مکان ساخت فخر و مدین در مساجد تاریخی». پژوهش‌های باستان‌شناسی، 9(20): 165-182. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2019.16867.1782
26. - نقره‌کار، عبدالحمید، (1392). حکمت هنر و معماری اسلامی. تهران: دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.
27. - وحدت‌طلب، مسعود؛ یاران، علی؛ و محمدی خوش‌بین، حامد، (1397). «بررسی مفهوم و ارزیابی پُروخالی در جداره‌های خانه‌های تاریخی تبریز». پژوهش‌های معماری اسلامی، 6(19): 66-80. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1011-fa.html
28. - هاشم‌پور، پریسا؛ و میراحمدی، احمد، (1399). «تبیین سطوح، شاخصه‌ها و مراتب شفافیت در فضای معماری (مورد پژوهی: خانه رسولیان یزد)». نشریۀ هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی، 25(1): 67-78. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2021.302978.672459
29. - یاران، علی؛ و محمدی‌خوش‌بین، حامد، (1398). «راهکارهای توسعۀ مسکن در شهرهای کوچک مطالعه موردی: شهر خمام در استان گیلان». باغ نظر، 16 (78): 15-26. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.159599.3884
30. - یاران، علی؛ و مهرانفر، ارس، (1394). «تطابق شاخصه‌های مسکن بومی گیلان با معماری غرب». معماری و شهرسازی آرمانشهر، 8 (15): 169-79. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_34127.html
32. - Ali-Mohammadi, Gh. & Abdollahi, R., (2018). “Explanation of the basics of culture in Iranian native architecture and its relation with the creation of a sense of belonging to place”. Intenational Journal of Urban and Rural Management, 17 (50): 33-46. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-2163-fa.html (In Persian).
33. - Alipour, N., (2011). “Study of the Sash Designs of Qajar Palaces in Tehran”. Negareh Jornal, 9 (18): 0–3. https://sid.ir/paper/143047/fa (In Persian).
34. - Amid, H., (2014). Amid Culture. Tehran: Amir Kabir (In Persian).
35. - Amir Ahmadian, B., (2002). “Talash, a province in the South Caucasus”. Quarterly Journal of Talesh Research, 1(1): 25. (In Persian).
36. - Babaei, M. R., Soltanzadeh, H. & Sharikzadeh, M., (2011). “An Introduction to the Concept and Types of Transparency in Contemporary Western Art and Architecture”. Journal of Iranian Architecture and Urbanism. 3(3): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2011.61942 (In Persian).
37. - Bazin, M., (2012). “GĪLĀN i. GEOGRAPHY AND ETHNOGRAPHY”. Encyclopaedia Iranica, 10(6): 617–625
38. - Brzezicki, M., (2013). “Understanding Transparency Perception in Architecture: Presentation of the Simplified Perforated Model”. Perception, 42(1): 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7245 .
39. - Damyar, S. & Nari Ghomi, M., (2012). “The Comparative Study of the Space Concept in the Vernacular Architecture and Modern Architecture”. Architecture and Urban planning, 17(1): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2012.29698 (In Persian).
40. - Darbandi, M., Ahmadi, M., Alidoost, S. & Rahimi, S., (2015). “Improving the performance of contextual architectural elements in Guilan architecture and its re-creation in modern structures using nanotechnology”. Journal of Iranian Architecture and Urbanism, 6(2):5–18. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2016.62004 (In Persian).
41. - Dari, A. & Talischi, Gh., (2017). “Explaining the Transparency of the Spatial Structure of Iranian Architecture in the Safavid Period: A Case Study: Hasht Behesht Pavilion and Imam Mosque of Isfahan”. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Islamic City Studies, 7(27): 41–50. https://sid.ir/paper/177421/fa (In Persian).
42. - Dehkhoda, A. A., (2014). Dehkhoda Dictionary. Tehran: Rozaneh. (In Persian).
43. - Dondis, D. A., (2010). A Primer Of Visual Literacy. 5th ed., edited by Reza Khabazha, Tehran: Khaneh Honarmandan.
44. - Estremadoyro, V., (2003). Transparency and Movement in Architecture. State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-07312008-110535/unrestricted/VeronicaEstremadoyro_ThesisBook_27August2008.pdf
45. - Faqirnawaz, J., Abizadeh, S., Parvizi, R. & Danesh Shakib, M., (2019). “Designing a liveliness Urban Space with the Approach of Behavioral Setting Improvement (Case Study: Mirabolghasemi St., Rasht)”. Urban planing knowledg, 5(1): 47–65. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.13801.1243 (In Persian).
46. - Giedion, S., (1962). Space, Time, and Architecture. london: Cambridge press.
47. - Golestani, S., Hojat, I. & Saedvandi, M., (2018). “A survey on spatial integration and the process of evolution in the Iranian mosque”. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 22(4): 29-44. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.65695 (In Persian).
48. - Gorji Mahlabani, Y. & Daneshvar, K., (2010). “Impact of Climate on the Principles of Gilan Traditional Architecture”. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 3(4): 135-146. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_32649.html (In Persian).
49. - Hasanpour Lomer, S., (2014). “The Typology of Traditional Houses in Talesh City: Case Study of Khalehsara 57 Village”. The journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 33(147): 117-131. http://jhre.ir/article-1-594-en.html (In Persian).
50. - Hashempour, P. & Mirahmadi, A., (2020). “Investigation the levels, Features and hierarchies of transparency in Architectural space”. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 25(1): 67-78. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2021.302978.672459
51. - Jafari, A., (1990). Geographical Encyclopedia of Iran. Vol. 1. (In Persian).
52. - Kunnawar, S., (2010). Transparency in Architecture. Smt. M.M. College of Architecture.
53. - Lang, J., (2016). The Creation of Architectural Theory. Translated by Alireza Ainifar, 8th edition. Tehran: University of Tehran. (In Persian).
54. - Mahdavi-Nejad, M. J. & Kia, A., (2019). “Modernization of Traditional Shells (Shebak) of Iranian Architecture, Towards Optimizing Light and Energy Reception; Case Study: Tehran Office Buildings”. Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 7(9): 69–82. https://smb.yazd.ac.ir/article_1655.html?lang=fa (In Persian).
55. - Marzban, P. & Marouf, H., (2013). Illustrated Culture of Visual Arts. Sixth edition. Tehran: Soroush. (In Persian).
56. - Mohammadi Khoshbin, H. & Yaran, A., (2019). “Housing Development Strategies in Small Cities, Case Study: Khomam City in Guilan”. Bagh-e Nazar, 16(78): 15-26. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2019.159599.3884 (In Persian).
57. - Momeni, K., (2018). “The Comparison between the Transparency Principle in the Form and Design of Safavid and Qajar Homes in Isfahan”. JRIA., 6(1): 22-42. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-921-en.html (In Persian).
58. - Nejad-Ebrahimi, A. & Tooranpoor, M., (2019). “Sense of Place in the Mosques Based on a Comparative Study of the Shape and Place of Making Fakhr-O-Madin in Historical Mosques”. Archaeological Research of Iran, 9(20): 165-182. https://doi.org/10.22084/nbsh.2019.16867.1782 (In Persian).
59. - Noghrekar, A., (2013). The Wisdom of Islamic Art and Architecture. Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology (In Persian).
60. - Oktem Erkartal, P. & Uzunkaya, A., (2019). “Transparency as A Component of Public Space”. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(9): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092026
61. - Pakbaz, R., (2021). Encyclopedia of Art. Sixteenth edition. Tehran: Contemporary Culture.
62. - Rahnami, M. T., (2001). “Where is Talesh and who is Talesh? ”. Talesh Research, 1(1): 9 & 14. (In Persian).
63. - Rosales, C., (2022). Spatial Transparency in Architecture: Light, Layering, and Porosity. In Routledge (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003223399
64. - Saadat, D., Etesam, I., Mokhtabad-Amrai, S. M. & Mahdavinejad, M., (2017). “Explain Concept of Transparency in Terms of Modern, Postmodern and Evaluating that in Islamic Iranian Architecture”. JRIA., 5(2): 75-90. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-766-en.html (In Persian).
65. - Salari, S., Mohammadi, B. & Piri, S., (2013). “Analytical study of the manifestation of transparency and emphasis on reducing material and increasing space in some valuable examples of Iranian architecture”. Haft Hesar Jornal Of Environmental Studies, 1(4): 71–81. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-766-en.html (In Persian).
66. - Saremi, A. A. & Gol Amini, Sh., (2000). “Architecture of Gilan”. The Book of Gilan (Volume 2), Ebrahim Eshal Arabani, Second Edition. Tehran: Iranian Researchers Group (In Persian).
67. - Schultz, Ch. N., (2012). The Roots of Modern Architecture. 3rd ed. edited by Translated from English to Persian by: Mohammadreza Jodat. Tehran: Shaidi.
68. - Shad Qhazvini, P., Pak Seresht Esmaeeli, S. & Fatemi, F., (2016). “The Variety of Arabesque-Rococo Patterns Applied in Naseri Furniture in Iran A Case Study: Decorations of Furniture in Bagh-e-Afifabad and in Narenjestan of Shiraz”. Paykareh, 5(9): 19-33. https://doi.org/10.22055/pyk.2016.14547 (In Persian).
69. - Wahdattalab, M., Yaran, A. & Mohammadi Khoshbin, H., (2018). “Concept and Evaluation of Porosity in Façades of Tabriz Historical Houses”. JRIA., 6(2): 66-80. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1011-fa.html (In Persian).
70. - Yaran, A. & Mehranfar, A., (2016). “Investigation the Relationship between the Attributes of Vernacular Residential Architecture of Gilan and the Attributes of Modern Architecture”. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 8(15): 169-179. https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_34127.html (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.